Photosensitized Electron-Transfer Reactions in Colloidal SiOz Systems

Ild. Relative to ZnC the energy of the al, orbital of ZnOEC is raised owing to the substitution of the six effective (for this orbital) alkyl perturbe...
0 downloads 0 Views 423KB Size
J. Am. Chem. SOC.1981, 103, 3203-3205

which relates the absolute MCD signs of the four lowest energy electronic transitions of systems derivable from a (4N + 2)-electron [nlannulene perimeter with their molecular structure. According to this model the signs of the Alls or BIlb terms of such systems are directly related to the relative size of the orbital-energy differences between the two highest occupied (AHOMO) and the two lowest unoccupied (ALUMO) molecular orbitals. In the event that AHOMO - ALUMO > 0 a normal (-+-+) sign pattern is predicted, whereas if AHOMO - ALUMO C 0, then an inverted (+-+-) sign pattern should result.Ild Michl has applied his model to porphyrins and reduced porphyrins. However, it is evident (Figure 1 and 2) that the MCD sign pattern of chlorins is far more sensitive to substituent effects than had earlier been supposed. Therefore, it is important to examine the model in greater detail. The representations (Figure 3A) of the porphin four-orbital M O s given by Gouterman,lZwhich agree qualitatively with the electron density maps computed for magnesium porphine by Spangler et al.,I3 provide a visual basis for estimating the relative magnitudes of the effects of substituents on the energy levels of the HOMO and LUMO orbitals. The work of Meot-Ner and AdlerI4 indicates that meso phenyl groups behave as conjugative electron donating (-E) substituents with respect to the porphyrin ring. They are effective in splitting the HOMOs, since the ratio ~ ~ ( Q ~ ) / ~ ~ achanges x ( Qfrom ~ ~ 0.06 ) l to ~ about 1 on going from porphine dianion to tetraphenylporphyrin dianion. Alkyl groups donate electrons to the porphyrin ring12 but their -E effectI6 is relatively weak, since the visible band ratio for octaethylporphyrin dianion is only 0.5. In addition, an alkyl group is considered to raise the HOMO orbital more than the LUMOs since, although the porphine orbital coefficients at the pyrrole positions (Figure 3A) are larger in the L U M O s than in the HOMO’S, the latter are closer in energy to those of the alkyl donor orbitals. Finally, the electron-withdrawing effect of zincI2 is not strong since the band ratio for zinc porphine is again about 0.5. With these caveats in mind we summarize the qualitative effects of substituents and ring reduction on the energy levels of the H O M O s and LUMO’s of porphine in Figure 3B. Porphine dication (or, equivalently porphine dianion), for which the L U M O s are degenerate by symmetry and the HOMO’s accidentally so, is taken as the reference compound. Replacement of the four central protons of porphine dication by zinc lowers the energy of the a2, orbital. AHOMO - ALUMO > 0 and a normal MCD sign pattern is predicted for ZnP as is observed.” Saturation of the pyrrole double bond of ring IV (Figure 3A) reduces the size of the conjugation path, thereby raising the energies of the e,l and al, orbitals but has little effect on the e,2 and a2, orbitals, since for them the electron density in ring IV is small. The energy shift is greater for e,l than for al, because of the relative difference in the electron densities in the two orbitals at the site of reduction. For ZnC AHOMO - ALUMO C 0 and an inverted MCD sign pattern is predicted (in agreement with Michl’s conclusionlIbfor chlorin dianion) and observed at least for the QJ and Qoxbands (Figure 2).Ild Relative to ZnC the energy of the al, orbital of ZnOEC is raised owing to the substitution of the six effective (for this orbital) alkyl perturbers. The energies of both LUMOs are also raised, however, only two alkyl groups perturb the e,l orbital, whereas four are effective in raising the energy of the e,2 orbital. Thus, relative to ZnC ALUMO is decreased but AHOMO is increased. AHOMO - ALUMO > 0 and the predicted normal sign pattern is consonant with the experimental spectrum (Figure 2). In (12) Gouterman, M. J . Mol. Spectrosc. 1961,6, 138-163. (13) Spangler, D.; Maggiora, G. M.; Shipman, L. L.; Christofferson, R.

E.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 7478-7489.

(1 4) Meot-Ner, M.; Adler, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975,97,5107-5 1 1 1 . (15) This ratio provides a convenient measure of the degeneracy of the lowest excited configurations, ’(aheJ and ’(al,e ). Spellane, P. J.; Gouterman, M.; Antipas, A.; Kim, S.; Liu, Y. C. Inorg. t h e m . 1980, 19, 386-391. (16) Whipple, M. R.; VaSiXk, M.; Michl, J. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1978, 100, 6844-6852. (17).Barth, G.; Linder, R. E.; Waespe-Sarcevic, N.; Bunnenberg, E.; Djerassi, C.;Aronowitz, Y. J.; Gouterman, M. J. Chem. SOC.,Perkin Trans. 2 1977, 337-343.

3203

-

ZnTPC the azuorbital is strongly raised (vide supra) so that now AHOMO 0 which is consistent with the inverted sign pattern (Figure 1). In addition, from a comparison of IAHOMO ALUM01 for ZnC and ZnTPC one can readily understand the basic cause of the large difference between the values of [e], for the two chlorins (>8x for the QoYbands). Finally, note that in ZnRhC (Figure 1) a vinyl and a methoxycarbonyl group are situated on rings I and 111, respectively. The methoxycarbonyl group, in particular, is strongly electron withdrawing, and substitution of this group for an alkyl in ZnOEC should lower the energies of the e,2 and al, orbitals while leaving the e,l and a2, orbitals largely unaffected. As a result AHOMO - ALUMO C 0, thus rationalizing the inverted sign pattern. We believe that the data and analyses reported here on the effects of substituents on the MCD of reduced porphyrins strongly support the utility and applicability of Michl’s model” for these systems. In a detailed reportla we will show that a similar perturbation treatment is required to explain other instances of substituent-induced sign and intensity variations in the MCD of other chlorins, bacteriochlorins, and isobacteriochlorins.

Acknowledgment. We thank Professor R. H. Holm for his interest in this project and Ruth Records for her instrumental assistance. A.M.S. was a predoctoral fellow of the Fannie and John Hertz Foundation. Financial support of this research was provided by grants from the National Science Foundation (CH77-04397 and CHE-80-09240) and the National Institutes of Health (GM-20276 and HL-16833). (18) Keegan, J. D.; Stolzenberg, A. M.; Lu, Y. C.; Linder, R. E.; Barth, G.; Moscowitz, A.; Bunnenberg, E.; Djerassi, C., Manuscript in preparation.

Photosensitized Electron-Transfer Reactions in Colloidal SiOz Systems: Charge Separation at a Solid-Aqueous Interface Itamar Willner,* John W. Otvos, and Melvin Calvin Laboratory of Chemical Biodynamics Department of Chemistry and Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 Received January 9, 1981 Separation of products formed in photoinduced electron-transfer processes is essential for efficient energy storage.’,2 Several approaches involving systems such as functionalized micelle^,^.^ liposomes,5s6micro emulsion^,^ and polyelectrolytes8~9have been used as means to assist charge separation. In these processes the thermodynamically favored back reactions of the photoproducts can be retarded, and further utilization of the photochemical energy so stored can make feasible the decomposition of water. Particular attention has been devoted to the photosensitized re(1) (a) Calvin, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1978,10, 369. (b) Porter, G.; Archer, M. D. ISR, Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 1976, I , 119. (2) (a) Kahn, H. J . Photochem. 1979, IO, 1 1 1 . (b) Willner, I.; Ford, W. E.; Otvos, J. W.; Calvin, M. In “Bioelectrochemistry”;Keyzer, H., Gutmann, F., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1980; p 55-81. (3) (a) Kalyanasundaram, K. Chem. SOC.Rev. 1978, 7, 453. (b) Turro, N . J.; GrBtzel, M.; Brown, A. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1980,19, 675 and references cited therein. (4) (a) Moroi, Y.; Infelta, P. P.; Gritzel, M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1979,101, 573. (b) Moroi, Y.; Brown, A. M.; GrBtzel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979,101, 567. (5) Ford, W. E.; Otvos, J. W.; Calvin, M. Nature (London)1978,274,507. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1979, 76, 3590. (6) Infelta, P. P.; Gritzel, M.; Fendler, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,102, 1479. (7) (a) Willner, I.; Ford, W. E.; Otvos, J. W.; Calvin, M. Nature (London) 1979, 280, 823. (b) Jones, C. A,; Weaner, L. E.; Mackay, R. A. J . Phys. Chem. 1980,84, 1495. (c) Rodgers, M. A. J.; Becker, J. C. J . Phys. Chem. 1980,84, 2762. (8) (a) Meisel, D.; Matheson, M. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1977,99,6577. (b) Meisel, D.; Matheson, M. S.; Rabani, J. Ibid. 1978, ZOO, 117. (9) Myerstein, D.; Rabani, J.; Matheson, M. S.;Meisel, D. J . Phys. Chem. 1978, 82, 1879.

0002-786318111503-3203%01.25/0 0 1981 American Chemical Society

3204 J . Am. Chem. SOC., Vol. 103, No. 11, 1981

Communications to the Editor hv

I I

/

60 -

,

/ /

/

TEA' /

-

,

x40-

/

/

TEA

Figure 2. Schematic function of S i 0 2 particles in the photosensitized electron-transfer process.

I

methylpyridinium porphyrin, Z ~ ( T M P Y P ) ~and +, R ~ ( b p y ) ~ ~ + . Triethanolamine (TEA) was used as the electron donor in each I case. This electron donor (E? = 0.82 V) is irreversibly decomposed I during its oxidation.lk.b A typical reaction mixture was composed of an aqueous Si02 colloidal suspension, including PVSO, Z ~ ( T M P Y P ) ~and + , TEA. The solution was deaerated with argon and illuminated at intervals of 15 s with a Xe 1000-W lamp (light filtered through a CuS04 solution and Corning 3-72 and Corning 5-57 filters, X = 430-550 nm, incident photon flux 5.0 X lo-' einstein s-l). A rapid formation of the blue viologen radical (PVS-.) was observed, and its rate of production was followed spectroscopically at X 735 nm 20 40 60 80 100 ( 6 2500 M-' cm-') (Figure la). The initial quantum yield was x IO7 einstein absorbed ,,$ , = 0.37. Exclusion of the S i 0 2 particles resulted in a sigFigure 1. Propyl viologen radical (PVS-a) formation as a function of light nificantly reduced rate of PVS; production, 6- = 0.038 (Figure M, [TEA] absorbed. All experiments at p H 10.2, [PVSo] = 2 X 1b). The dramatic enhancement of the electron-transfer process = 1 X lo-' M. (a) 0.1% S i 0 2 colloidal system, sensitizer Z ~ ( T M P Y P ) ~ + quantum yield in the colloidal system (10-fold) is attributed to (3.5 X lod M). (b) Homogeneous aqueous solution, sensitizer Znthe presence of negatively charged particles, which assist the (TMPyP)" (3.5 X lod M). (c) 0.1% S i 0 2 colloidal system, sensitizer separation of the photoproducts and retard their recombination Zn(TPPS)' (9.2 X lod M). (d) Homogeneous aqueous solution, sen(Figure 2). The positively charged sensitizer [ Z ~ ( T M P Y P ) ~ + ] sitizer Zn(TPPS)4- (9.2 X 10" M). is adsorbed to the surface of the particle by Coulombic attracduction of 4,4'-bi yridinium salts (viologens) by Ru(bpy)t+ and t i o n ~ . Electron ~~ transfer to the neutral, zwitterionic acceptor zinc porphyrins.' B, I1 With these systems the photoreduction of 1 results in formation of the oxidized sensitizer Z ~ ( T M P Y P ) ~ + water to hydrogen as well as photooxidation of water have been and the negatively charged acceptor PVS; (eq 1). The negatively accomplished.12J3 hu Here, we wish to report that an aqueous Si02 colloid provides Z ~ ( T M P Y P )+ ~ +PVSo Z ~ ( T M P Y P ) ~ +PVS-. (1) kb an especially effective solid-liquid interface. It has a very high, negative surface charge density that can retard the back reactions charged silica particles (surface potential ca. -170 mV)I5 eject while allowing the forward reaction with a neutral electron acthe reduced acceptor into the bulk aqueous phase, thus retarding ceptor to proceed. its recombination with Z ~ ( T M P Y P ) ~ The + . oxidized sensitizer The colloidal Si02 suspension employed is composed of particles is then available for the necessary oxidation of TEA. with a mean diameter of 40 A. At pH >6 the particles are A flash photolysis study has confirmed the role of the interface negatively charged and characterized by a high surface poter1tia1.l~ in retarding recombination of photoproducts. The bimolecular As a result, the interfacial system is capable of producing elecrate constant for disappearance of PVS; and Z ~ ( T M P Y P )was ~+ trostatic attractions and repulsions with charged species formed close to that for a diffusion-controlled reaction in the homogeneous in the photosensitized electron transfer. We have investigated solution but slower by a factor of at least 100 in the presence of the effect of the negatively charged solid interface on the phoSi02 colloid. Replacement of the positively charged sensitizer tosensitized reduction of propyl viologensulfonate, PVSo (l),by with a negatively charged one would be expected to diminish the enhancing effect of the charged interface. Indeed, substitution of zinc meso-tetraphenylporphyrinsulfonate[ Z ~ I ( T P P S ) ~for] Z ~ ( T M P Y P )gives ~ + in the colloidal system a quantum yield (6= 0.016) very similar to that obtained in the corresponding hoso, -03s-J mogeneous solution (6- = 0.012) (Figure lc,d). Thus, repulsion each of two positively charged sensitizers, zinc meso-tetraof the two negatively charged photoproducts by the Si02particles allows a recombination rate similar to that observed in a homogeneous solution. (IO) (a) Sutin, N. J . Photochem. 1979, IO, 19. (b) Whitten, D. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 83. The role of the surface potential in enhancing the quantum yield (1 1) (a) Kalyanasundaram, K.; Grltzel, M. Helv. Chim. Acra 1980,63, of the electron-transfer process was confirmed by varying the ionic h > 9 9

I

0

/

Y

+

478. (b) McLendon, G.; Miller, D. S.J. Chem. SOC.,Chem. Commun. 1980, 5 3 3 . (c) Darwent, J. R. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980, 805. (12) (a) Kirsch, M.; Lehn, J.-M.; Sauvage, J. P. Helu. Chim. Acta 1979, 62, 1345. (b) Kalyanasundaram, K.; Kiwi, J.; Grltzel, M. Helu. Chim. Acta 1978,61,2720. (c) Moradpour, A.; Amouyal, E.; Keller, P.; Kagan, H. Nouu. J. Chim. 1978, 2, 547. (d) DeLaive, P. J.; Sullivan, B. P.; Meyer, T. J.; Whitten, D. G. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1979, 101, 4007. (13) (a) Kalyanasundaram, K.; Micic, 0.; Promauro, E.; Grltzel, M. Helu. Chim. Acra 1979,62,2432. (b) Lehn, J.-M., Sauvage, J. P.; Ziessel, R. Nouv. J . Chim. 1979,3,423. (c) Kalyanasundaram, K.; Gratzel, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1979, 18, 759. (14) Iler, R. K. "The Colloid Chemistry of Silica and Silicates"; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, 1955; p 233.

(15) By using a positively charged spin label it has been confirmed independently that the positive species interacts with the negative SiO, interface. The sharp ESR signal of the spin label in a homogeneous aqueous solution becomes very broad upon addition of SiOz particles. Increasing the ionic strength of the colloidal system results in the reappearance of the sharp signal characteristic of homogeneous solution. On the basis of the number of ionized sites on the particle a value of ca. -170 mV for the surface potential has been calculated. A comprehensivecorrelation of surface potential with the observed photosensitized electron-transfer process as well as the binding constant measurements of Ru(bpy)?* to the Si02particles will be published elsewhere.

J . Am. Chem. SOC.1981, 103, 3205-3207 0.5

3205

3-Acyltetramic Acid Antibiotics. 1. Synthesis of Tirandamycic Acid' Robert E. Ireland,* Peter G. M. Wuts,? and Beat Ernst

0.4

Contribution No. 6365, The Chemical Laboratories California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91 125 Received February 17, 1981

/

/ /

/

O,?

I

z

Tirandimycin (1)2is a member of a small group of 3-acyltetramic acid antibiotics3that have occasioned considerable interest4 due to their potent inhibition of bacterial DNA-directed RNA polymerases and the selective inhibition of terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase from leukemic cellsS6 Together with the

3 X

7 7 v)

> A

0.2

0,l

40

80 X

120 160 200 IO7 einstein absorbed

I

Figure 3. Propyl viologen radical (PVS-a) formation as a function of ionic strength of the system. Experiments at pH 9.8, [PVSO] = 1 X lo-' M, [TEA] = 1 X IO-' M; sensitizer Z~(TMPYP)~+ (4 X lod M). (a) [NaCl] = 0.002 M; (b) [NaCI] = 0.1 M; (c) [NaCl] = 0.5 M.

strength of the reaction medium. Increasing the ionic strength is expected to decrease the surface potential of the particle^'^^'^ and shorten the range of effective electrostatic repulsions. Indeed, at an ionic strength of 0.5 M NaCl the quantum yield of PVS-. production dropped to, , @, = 0.07 (Figure 3). The enhancing effect of the Si02particles on the quantum yield is similar in a system that includes the positively charged Ru(bpy)32+instead of Z ~ ( T M P Y P ) ~as+ sensitizer. A colloidal suspension of 0.1% Si02 particles containing Ru(bpy)32+(7.6 X M), PVSo (1 X M) and TEA M) at pH 9.6 was deaerated and illuminated under the conditions previously described. The quantum yield for the photosensitized production of PVS-. in the interfacial system (4, = 0.04) was 13-fold that in the corresponding homogeneous system (4, = 0.003). Again, as with the zinc sensitizer, flash photolysis experiments showed a large reduction in back-reaction rate (eq 2) in the presence of Ru(bpy)j2+

hv + PVSO Z R ~ ( b p y ) 3 ~++PVS-. kb

(2)

SO2: kb = 5.7 X lo7 M-' s-I compared with kb = 7.9 X lo9 M-' s-l in the homogeneous solution. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the introduction of the solid Si02interface can affect strongly the efficiency of the photosensitized electron-transfer process. By proper charge functionalization of the electron acceptor and donor, electrostatic repulsive or attractive interactions can be established. The high charge density of the colloidal silica particles provides a driving force for charge separation and diminishes back reactions. The stabilized intermediary photoproducts might then be further coupled with efficient reactions that result in the decomposition of water. These aspects are currently being investigated. Acknowledgment. The work described herein was sponsored by the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences Division of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract W-7405-ENG-48. (16) Reference 14, Chapter 5, p 108.

2

structurally similar streptolydigin3* (2), these antibiotics seem to exhibit contrasting activity to the simpler 3-acyltetramic acids known;' it is possible4 that the differing activities is a result of the complex, 2,9-dioxabicycl0[3.3. llnonane system common to both antibiotics. This very complexity as well as the opportunity to develop synthetic strategy for the construction of more diverse analogues of these interesting antibiotics prompted an investigation of their total synthesis. The successful conclusion of the first phase of this program-namely, the synthesis of tirandamycic acid (23)2 in its optically active, natural form from D-glUCOSe-iS recorded here.* The basic plan for this synthesis was the construction of a suitably substituted 2,9-dioxabicyclo[3.3.l]nonanesystem from the pyran form of the sugar and then modification of the rudimentary substitution to fit the complex pattern of the antibiotic. The first problem was the conversion of the sugar to an appropriate C-glycoside. This was efficiently accomplished through application of the ester enolate Claisen rearrangementg to the propionate 4 derived from the commercially available glycal 31° (Scheme I), 'Postdoctoral Fellow of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, 1978-1 979. (1) This investigation was supported by Grant CA-18191, awarded by the National Cancer Institute, DHEW, and the Hoffmann-La Roche Foundation. (2) Duchamp, D. J.; Branfman, A. R.; Button, A. C.; Rinehart, K. L.,Jr., J . Am. Chem. SOC.1973,95, 4077-4078. MacKellar, K. L.;Grostic, M. F.; Olson, E. C.; Wnuk, R. J.; Branfman, A. R.; Rinehart, K. L., Jr., Ibid. 1971, 93, 4943-4945. (3) (a) Steptolydigin: Rinehart, K. L.,Jr.; Beck, J. R.; Borders, D. B.; Kinstle, T. H.; Krauss, D. J . Am. Chem. SOC.1963,85, 4038-4039. (b) Bu2313A and B: Tsunakawa, M.; Tcda, S.; Okita, T.; Hanada, M.; Nakagawa, S.; Tsukiura, H.; Naito, T.; Kawaguchi, H. J. Anzibiol. 1980, 33, 166-172. (c) Nocamycin: Horvath, G.; Brazhnikova, M. G.; Konstantinova, N. V.; Tolstykh, IV.; Potapova, N. P. Ibid. 1979,32, 555-558. (4) See,for instance: Lee,V. J.; Branfman, A. R.; Herrin, T. R.; Rinehart, Jr., K. L.,J . Am. Chem. SOC.1978,100, 4225-4236 and references cited therein. ( 5 ) Reusser, F. Infect. Immun. 1970,2, 77-81. (6)DiCioccio, R. A,; Srivastava, B. I. S . Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1976,72, 1343-1349. (7) Gitterman, C. O., J . Med. Chem. 1965,8, 483-486: Selmiciu, I.; Gruceanu, I.; Pal, B., Pharm. Zentralhalle 1965,104,480-488. Chernov, V. A,; Safonova, T. S . Probl. Gematol. Pereliv. Krovi 1965,10, 3-13 (Chem. Abstr. 1966,64, 87800. Yuki, H.; Kitanaka, E.; Yamao, A.; Kariya, K.; Hashimoto, Y.Gann 1971,62, 199-206. (8) For other synthetic efforts restricted to the preparation of 3-dienoyltetramic acid analogues of these antibiotics, see, ref 4. (9) Ireland, R. E.; Mueller, R. H.; Willard, A. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 2868-2877.

0002-7863/81/l503-3205$01.25/00 1981 American Chemical Society