Physiological Responses of Salinity-Stressed ... - ACS Publications

Subscriber access provided by Fudan University

Article

Physiological Responses of Salinity-Stressed Vibrio sp. and the Effect on Biofilm Formation on Nanofiltration Membrane LanHee Kim, and Tzyy Haur Chong Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02904 • Publication Date (Web): 20 Dec 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 28, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 34

Environmental Science & Technology

1 2 3

Physiological Responses of Salinity-Stressed Vibrio sp. and the Effect

4

on Biofilm Formation on Nanofiltration Membrane

5

Lan Hee Kim,† Tzyy Haur Chong*,†,⊥

6

7

†

8

Nanyang Technological University, 1 Cleantech Loop, CleanTech One 06-08, Singapore 637141,

9

Singapore

10

⊥

Singapore Membrane Technology Centre, Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute,

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang

11

Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore

12

*Corresponding author (E-mail: [email protected], Tel: +65-6513-8126, Fax: +65-6791-0756)

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


27

ABSTRACT

28

This study evaluated the effects of salinity on the physiological characteristics of Vibrio sp.

29

B2 and biofilm formation on nanofiltration (NF) membrane coupons used in the high

30

recovery seawater desalination process. The test conditions were at 0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4 M

31

sodium chloride (NaCl), equivalent to salinity of seawater, brine at 50% and 75% water

32

recovery, respectively. High salinity inhibited the cell growth rate, but increased the viability

33

and bacterial membrane integrity. In addition, protein and eDNA concentrations of salinity-

34

stressed bacteria were increased at 1.2 M and 2.4 M NaCl. In particular, protein concentration

35

was linearly correlated with the NaCl concentration. Similarly, less biofilm formation on the

36

NF membrane coupon (without permeation flux) was observed by the salinity-stressed

37

bacteria, however, the production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) was

38

significantly increased as compared to control; and protein was an influential factor for

39

biofilm formation. This study shows that salinity-stressed bacteria have a high potential to

40

cause biofouling on membrane surface as the bacteria still maintain the cell activity and

41

overproduce EPS. The potential of biofilm formation by the salinity-stressed bacteria has not

42

been reported. Therefore, the findings are important to understand the mechanisms of

43

membrane biofouling under high salinity environment.

44 45

Keywords: Salinity-stressed bacteria, Vibrio sp., Biofilm, Nanofiltration membrane

46 47 48 49 50 51 2


Page 2 of 34

Page 3 of 34


52

INTRODUCTION

53

Reverse osmosis (RO) membrane desalination has become a promising technology to

54

produce high quality drinking water from seawater. However, low process recovery, which is

55

typically below 50%, has been considered as a major disadvantage of the technology. Low

56

recovery means high volume of discharge of brine which can adversely affect the marine

57

ecosystems and increase the desalination cost due to treatment of brine before disposal.1-3

58

Thus, high recovery of seawater desalination process is desired and has been explored. For

59

the zero-discharge of brine (i.e. 100% recovery), technologies that have been employed

60

include membrane distillation (MD) process and thermal methods such as brine concentrators

61

or crystallizers.4-6 In addition, in our previous work, an energy-efficient reverse osmosis

62

(EERO) process, which combines conventional single-stage reverse osmosis (SSRO) with a

63

countercurrent membrane cascade with recycle (CMCR), can achieve a significantly higher

64

water recovery (i.e. 75%) at a reduced osmotic pressure differential relative to SSRO. The

65

CMCR consists of countercurrent retentate and permeate flow, permeate recycle, and

66

retentate self-recycling via one or more nanofiltration (NF) stages.7,

67

recovery desalination process was limited in practice due to membrane fouling that can

68

reduce the performance efficiency and increase the operational cost.6, 9 Implications of high

69

recovery include increase in the concentrations of salts as well as potential foulants in the

70

system, which may exacerbate the membrane fouling. Among the fouling types, biofouling

71

has been considered a major problem to be solved. Bacteria are transported to the membrane

72

surface due to permeation flux.

73

membrane surface through electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions; bacteria are auto-

74

aggregated and produce extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that maintain the biofilm

75

structure by providing mechanical stability and protect bacteria from biocides via preventing

76

the mass transport of antibiotics through the biofilm.9, 10

8

However, high

Biofouling is initiated by attachment of bacteria on

3



77 78

Environmental stresses such as salt stress can cause physiological changes to the

79

microorganisms and influence the subsequent biofilm formation. High external osmolarity

80

may cause plasmolysis and dehydration in some bacteria that lead to the inhibition of

81

physiological processes such as nutrient uptake and DNA replication.11, 12 To cope with the

82

salinity stress environment, microorganisms actively responded to maintain turgor and cell

83

volume by osmoadaptation reaction.12 First, two stages of osmoadaptation responses occurred

84

consecutively: uptake of potassium (K+) and accumulation of osmoprotectants.13 As a rapid

85

response of osmotic up-shock, K+ uptake was performed by K+ uptake transport systems to

86

balance the net negative charge of cytoplasmic macromolecules. When the salt concentration

87

was above certain threshold level, a secondary response, the accumulation of osmoprotectants

88

such as glycine betaine, carnitine and proline, was triggered.13 Second, the production of EPS,

89

in terms of carbohydrate and protein, was enhanced as a protective response of bacteria under

90

salinity stress.14-17 The pool of compatible solutes in salinity-stressed bacteria was finely

91

tuned by uptake, synthesis, and excretion.12 The excretion of compatible solutes resulted in

92

the enhancement of EPS content and the decrease of intracellular compatible solutes

93

accumulation.17 It has been reported that EPS helped the bacteria to survive sodium toxicity

94

by acting as a diffusion barrier.18 Last, expression of osmoregulated promoters, such as

95

different σ-factors, enhanced the polysaccharide production and contributed to biofilm

96

formation on the surface.12 For instance, the overexpression of σB factor in halo-tolerant

97

Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus sp. and Bacillus subtilis were stimulated to

98

form biofilm in microtitre plate assay under high salt concentrations by increased production

99

of polysaccharide intercellular adhesion.19

100 101

To the best of our knowledge, however, the study on the influence of high salinity condition 4


Page 4 of 34

Page 5 of 34


102

on the physiological characteristics of bacteria and biofilm formation on the membrane

103

surface in seawater desalination is limited. For instance20, various feed salinities of low (38

104

g/L – 40 g/L TDS), medium (41 g/L – 44 g/L TDS) and high (46 g/L – 50 g/L TDS), or

105

equivalent to 1.1 – 1.4 × seawater salinities, prepared by blending of sand-filtered seawater

106

and concentrate from a full scale seawater desalination plant, were found to greatly affect the

107

biofouling dynamics in terms of bacteria multiplication and EPS release in a crossflow RO

108

membrane filtration unit. In general, ~ 85% decline in flux (from 1.3 to 0.2 m3/m2/d) and ~

109

68% decline in rejection (from 95 to 30%) at constant pressure operation were observed at

110

low salinity; this observation was correlated to higher reproduction of bacteria and greater

111

EPS concentration. Meanwhile at medium and high salinities, marginal decline in the

112

membrane performances (flux decreased from 0.64 to 0.52 and 0.54 to 0.42 m3/m2/d, and

113

rejection decreased from ~ 95 to 80%, respectively) were observed though the total

114

accumulated cells peaked at 105 cells/cm2 similar to low salinity condition. However, the

115

impact of concentration polarization on the biofouling in RO process was not considered.

116

Concentration polarization (CP) is a phenomenon arisen due to the accumulation of rejected

117

solutes on the surface of RO membrane that causes the concentration at the membrane

118

surface (Cw) higher than the bulk solution (Cb), in which its magnitude is an exponential

119

function of the ratio of flux (J) ÷ mass transfer (k) i.e. Cw/Cb ~ exp (J/k). In the above study19,

120

the initial flux at constant pressure and fixed crossflow operation at low feed salinity was

121

greater (~ 2 ×) than at medium and high feed salinities, indeed as a result the actual salinity

122

level was greater at the membrane surface where the biofilm was formed. Hence, the impact

123

of salinity level on biofouling was not justified. More importantly, the nutrient level at the

124

membrane surface, which was a limiting factor for biofilm formation, was greater under the

125

CP effect at the higher flux condition to support greater production of bacteria cells and EPS.

126

The impact of flux and nutrient levels on biofouling in RO has been well studied and reported 5



127

in the literatures.21-25

128 129

The microenvironment above the membrane surface is significantly influenced by multi-

130

factors such as flux, cross flow, recovery, membrane rejection etc., which vary spatially from

131

the first to the last element in an actual RO system26, 27. The condition is further complicated

132

by the interplay between these parameters and fouling i.e. fouling is flux-driven, but on the

133

other hand, fouling can reduce flux.28 Therefore, this study as an initial attempt to investigate

134

the biofouling event in a high recovery desalination process focused on the physiological

135

responses of salinity-stressed bacteria and the effects on biofilm formation on the membrane

136

surface under static condition, i.e. no permeation flux and crossflow, to isolate the salinity

137

factor and simplify the conditions encountered in an actual desalination system. To simulate

138

the salinity levels of seawater, brine at 50% and 75% water recovery, 0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4

139

M NaCl, respectively, were selected. First, the physiological characteristics of salinity-

140

stressed halo-tolerant bacteria Vibrio sp. B2 which was selected as a model bacterium in this

141

study with high potential of biofilm formation under various NaCl concentrations ranging

142

from 0.3 M (control) to 2.4 M were investigated. Second, the potential of biofilm formation

143

by salinity-stressed bacteria on the NF membrane coupon was evaluated under no membrane

144

permeation flux condition. NF membrane was used in this study to align with our previous

145

work on EERO to achieve high recovery desalination process. This study can help to

146

understand the mechanisms of biofilm formation by salinity-stressed bacteria and to propose

147

strategies to combat biofouling in a membrane system for efficient water recovery in the

148

desalination process.

149 150

MATERIALS AND METHODS

6


Page 6 of 34

Page 7 of 34


151

Selection of model bacterium. Bacteria were first isolated from seawater, brine, and

152

biofouled membrane coupon. 5 mL of raw seawater and brine samples, collected from a

153

seawater desalination plant in Singapore, were inoculated in 5 mL of marine broth 2216

154

including peptone and yeast extract as organic nutrient sources (Table S1; Difco, USA) and

155

incubated for 24 h at 37 ºC with continuous shaking. Biofouled membrane coupon, which

156

was obtained by operating a lab-scale reverse osmosis (RO) membrane desalination system

157

with raw seawater, was soaked in 10 mL of marine broth and incubated for 24 h at 37 ºC. All

158

the enriched cultures from different sources were spread on the marine agar (BD, NJ, USA)

159

and different forms of colonies on marine agar plate were incubated in a fresh marine broth

160

for 24 h at 37 ºC with continuous shaking. To assess the potential of biofilm formation of

161

isolated bacteria, microtiter plate biofilm assay was performed according to the methods as

162

previously described.29 Briefly, the cultured cells were centrifuged at 4,234 × g for 20 min

163

and washed with a phosphate buffered saline (PBS; Life Technologies, CA, USA) two times

164

followed by centrifugation at 4,234 × g for 10 min. The cultures (optical density at 600 nm to

165

1.0; OD600, 1.0) were incubated in a 96 well microplate (TPP, Trasadingen, Switzerland)

166

containing marine broth at 37 ºC for 24 h. The microplate was washed with MiliQ water and

167

stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution for 10 min at room temperature (RT). 250 µL of 95%

168

ethanol was added to the dried microplate and incubated for 10 min. The OD600 of crystal

169

violet-stained biofilm was measured by using a microplate reader (BioTek Synergy H1

170

Hybrid Reader, VT, USA). From the microplate biofilm assay, bacteria were divided into 4

171

categories: non-adherent, weakly adherent, moderately adherent, and strongly adherent

172

bacteria and the cut-off OD (ODc) indicates the mean OD of the negative control (without

173

cell inoculation).30 To further isolate the bacteria to be chosen as the model bacterium for

174

subsequent studies, membrane biofilm assay was carried out. The NF membrane (NE4040-90;

175

Toray Chemical Korea Inc., Seoul, Korea) was used in this study. It has −16 mV surface 7



Page 8 of 34

176

charge at pH 5.6 and 85-95% salt rejection under test condition with 2,000 mg/L of NaCl at 5

177

bar (Table S2).31-33 The cultured cells (OD600, 1.0) were inoculated into a 6-well plate

178

containing attached NE4040-90 NF membrane coupons (size of 2 × 2 cm2) and 5 mL marine

179

broth. The plate was incubated at 37 ºC for 4 days to form biofilm on the NF membrane

180

coupons. Bacteria having the highest potential of biofilm formation on the NF membrane

181

coupon was selected as a model bacterium and identified by analysis of 16S rDNA sequence.

182

Genomic DNA was extracted and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed with

183

universal

184

GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). The PCR reaction proceeded as follows: 95 ºC for 6 min,

185

30 cycles of 94 ºC for 60s, 58 ºC for 60s, and 72 ºC for 90s, followed by an elongation step

186

for 5 min at 72 ºC. The obtained DNA sequence was compared with database by doing the

187

basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) search.

primers,

27F

(5′-AGAGTTTGATCATGGCTCAG-3′)

and

1492R

(5′-

188 189

Effect of salt concentration on bacterial growth and viability. The OD600 of selected

190

model bacterium, Vibrio sp. B2, was adjusted to 1.0 and 50 µL of cell culture was added into

191

50 mL marine broth (contains background NaCl of 0.3 M) containing 0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4

192

M NaCl. Samples were taken at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 h, 24 h, 32 h, 48 h, and 60 h for

193

measurement of OD600 and cell viability. To analyze cell viability, samples were stained with

194

SYTO®9 and propidium iodide (PI) dyes (Molecular Probes, OR, USA) and cell numbers

195

were measured by flow cytometer (BD, NJ, USA). The percentage of live cells was

196

calculated by dividing the number of live cells by total cell numbers. In addition, the esterase

197

activity was analyzed by using 10 µM carboxyfluorescein diacetate (cFDA; Life

198

Technologies CA, USA) and PI staining dyes.34 For intracellular enzymatic conversion of

199

cFDA to carboxyfluorescein, cFDA stained cells were incubated at 37 ºC for 30 min. PI was

8


Page 9 of 34


200

added to label the cells with damaged membrane in the cFDA stained cells and incubated in

201

ice until analysis by flow cytometer (BD, NJ, USA).

202 203

Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) and surface charge. EPS

204

of salinity-stressed bacteria was extracted according to procedure in previous reference.35 In

205

brief, 0.06 mL of formaldehyde (36.5%; Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) was added to 10 mL of

206

sample and stored at 4 ºC for 1 h to prevent cell lysis by bacteria fixation. After cell fixation,

207

4 mL of 1 N NaOH was added and incubated for 3 h at 4 ºC. Then sample was centrifuged at

208

20,000 × g for 20 min and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 µm membrane and

209

dialyzed against MiliQ water using a 3,500 Da dialysis membrane (Pierce, IL, USA) for 24 h.

210

Lyophilized sample was re-suspended in 10 mL of MiliQ water. Carbohydrate (CH) content

211

was determined by phenol-sulfuric acid method.36 Briefly, 600 µL of concentrated sulfuric

212

acid was added to 200 µL of sample and 120 µL of 5% (w/v) phenol was added immediately,

213

followed by incubation for 5 min at 90 ºC. The solution was transferred to a 96-well

214

microplate and OD490 was measured by microplate reader (BioTek Synergy H1 Hybrid

215

Reader, VT, USA). Glucose standard solution was used as calibration to calculate the

216

carbohydrate concentration. Protein (PN) content was determined by using BCA assay kit

217

(Thermo Scientific Inc., NH, USA) according to the manufacture’s guidelines. The

218

concentration of extracellular DNA (eDNA) in EPS was determined by using Quant-iT

219

PicoGreen® dsDNA kit (Molecular Probes, OR, USA) and the fluorescence intensity was

220

analyzed by microplate reader (BioTek Synergy H1 Hybrid Reader, VT, USA). The three-

221

dimensional excitation-emission matrix (EEM) of EPS was analyzed by fluorescence

222

spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, MA, USA) under excitation of 220 nm to 450 nm and

223

emission of 280 nm to 550 nm. The zeta potential of salinity-stressed bacteria was analyzed

224

by zetasizer (Malvern Zetasizer nano-zs, Worcestershire, UK). 9



225 226

Effect of abrupt changes in salt concentrations on bacterial growth and viability. The

227

cultured bacteria were first inoculated in the marine broth containing 0.6 M NaCl and

228

incubated for 26 h until stationary phase. After 26 h of incubation, bacterial cells were

229

harvested by centrifugation at 4,234 × g for 20 min. Subsequently, the harvested cells were

230

inoculated into different marine broths containing 0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4 M NaCl and

231

incubated for 24 h. Bacterial growth (OD600), viability, and esterase activity were measured.

232 233

Metabolic activities of salinity-stressed Vibro sp. B2. The model bacterium was incubated

234

for 16 h to reach the log phase. The respiratory activity was analyzed by using a BacLight

235

RedoxSensor 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC) vitality kit (Molecular Probes,

236

OR, USA) according to the protocol provided by manufacturer. To calculate total cell

237

numbers, the sample was counter stained with SYTO®24 after staining with CTC reagent and

238

analyzed by flow cytometer (BD, NJ, USA). The percentage of respiratory active cells was

239

calculated via dividing the number of CTC positive cells by total cell numbers. The activity

240

of DNA synthesis was analyzed by using a Click-iT® EdU flow cytometry assay kit

241

(Molecular Probes, OR, USA). The ratio of EdU positive cells was calculated via dividing the

242

number of Alexa Fluor® 488 azide stained cells by total cell numbers.

243 244

Biofilm formation on NF membrane coupons (without membrane permeation flux).

245

Vibrio sp. B2 was incubated in marine broth for 24 h and cultured cells were harvested and

246

washed three times with PBS buffer. Cultured cells (OD600 1.0) were inoculated in a

247

microplate including marine broth containing 0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4 M NaCl and attached NF

248

membrane coupons (2 × 2 cm2). To form biofilm on NF membrane, the microplates were

249

incubated for 4 days under 90 rpm at 37 ºC. After 4 days, membrane coupons were washed 10


Page 10 of 34

Page 11 of 34


250

three times with PBS buffer and the total cell number, cell viability and EPS concentrations

251

were measured. The morphology and infrared fingerprint of biofilm formed on the NF

252

membrane coupons were characterized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM; Carl

253

Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared

254

spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR; Shimazu, Tokyo, Japan), respectively. In the CLSM analysis, to

255

stain the attached biofilm, fouled membrane coupons were soaked in 1 mL PBS containing

256

1µL each of SYTO®9 and PI dye, then washed with PBS three times and observed under

257

CLSM equipped with an argon laser having excitation wavelengths of 458 nm, 488 nm, 514

258

nm and 63 × plan-Apochromat objective. The images were captured by ZEN software

259

(version 2.1, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and surface area (µm2) or biovolume (µm3)

260

of biofilm were calculated by IMARIS software (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland). The

261

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (Rs) between NaCl concentrations and EPS

262

concentrations were analyzed.37

263 264

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

265

Selection of model bacterium. Total of 16 strains were categorized into strongly adherent

266

bacteria and 3 strains were moderately adherent bacteria (BF4, BF8, B4) from the microtiter

267

plate assay (Figure 1a). Among the strongly adherent bacteria, B2, B5, B6, and S5 strains that

268

showed significant biofilm formation were selected for subsequent biofilm assay on NF

269

membrane coupon. Strain B2 showed the highest potential of biofilm formation on NF

270

membrane (Figure 1b). B2, B5, and B6 were identified as Vibrio sp. (similarity 98-99%) and

271

S5 was highly similar with Shewanella haliotis (similarity 100%). Proteobacteria phylum has

272

been shown to be the most abundant bacterial group in seawater and fouled RO membrane.38,

273

39

274

saline-MBR with increase in salinity.40 As the belonging γ-proteobacteria class, Vibrio and

Among the Proteobacteria phylum, the abundance of γ-proteobacteria were elevated in

11



275

Shewanella species are well known biofilm-forming halo-tolerant bacteria in seawater reverse

276

osmosis system.41 Therefore, Vibrio sp. B2 was selected as a model bacterium in the

277

subsequent studies.

278 279

Changes in physiological characteristics of salinity-stressed bacteria. The physiological

280

characteristics of salinity-stressed bacterium, Vibrio sp. B2 were summarized in Table 1. As

281

compared to control, 0.1-log, 3.0-log, and 3.3-log reductions in total cell numbers were

282

observed and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 0.8 M NaCl that means

283

growth of Vibrio sp. B2 was inhibited by 50% at concentration of 0.8 M NaCl. However,

284

interestingly, cell viability was increased by 96.4% and 96.1% and membrane integrity

285

(esterase activity %) which provides the information about degree of membrane injury was

286

increased by 46.6% and 47.2% at 1.2 M and 2.4 M NaCl compared to control, respectively.

287

The effect of salinity on cell viability and membrane integrity were shown in Figure S1. As

288

the NaCl concentration increased from 0.3 M to 6.0 M, cell viability (Figure S1a) and

289

membrane integrity (Figure S1b) were increased by 96.9% and 52.6% after 24 h incubation,

290

respectively. As an osmoprotective activity, bacteria adapt their intracellular osmolarity or

291

increase their cell wall integrity to survive in a broad range of solute concentrations.42

292

However, the abrupt changes in salt concentrations showed different result in the

293

physiological responses of bacteria exposed to higher salinity for 24 h. When the cultured

294

cells at 0.6 M NaCl were transferred to a fresh medium with the same concentration of 0.6 M

295

NaCl, cell growth rate and 34.7% of viability were recovered in 3 h after the transfer (Figure

296

2a, 2b). However, when trasnferred from 0.6 M to higher salinities of 1.2 M and 2.4 M NaCl,

297

cell growth dropped significantly, which was an indication of cell death; and membrane

298

integrity was decreased by 4.4% and 16.0%, respectively (Figure 2a, 2c). This was because

299

bacteria could not adjust to the sudden changes of salinity within a short time. Bacterial cells 12


Page 12 of 34

Page 13 of 34


300

abruptly exposed to the high salinity medium may stay in a stage of plasmolysis which

301

resulted in the inhibition of physiological activities.11

302

On the other hand, protein concentration was increased by 3.1-log and 2.4-log, eDNA

303

concentration was increased by 3.3-log and 2.4-log at 1.2 M and 2.4 M NaCl compared to

304

control, respectively. However, the carbohydrate concentration was not affected by the

305

increase in salinity level. The increase in protein and eDNA at 1.2 M and 2.4 M NaCl caused

306

a strong negative bacteria surface charge (Table 1). The concentration of protein was

307

significantly correlated with the concentration of NaCl (Rs = 1.0, p < 0.05), while the

308

correlation of carbohydrate concentration with NaCl concentration was not considered as

309

statistically significant (Rs = 0.8, p > 0.05). Increase in EPS production under high salt

310

condition can be caused by secretion of osmoprotectants which are accumulated water-

311

soluble, low-molecular-weight intracellular organic compounds or autolysis of cells.16, 43, 44

312

The EEM fluorescence spectra help to understand the changes of EPS compositions in terms

313

of humic-like, protein-like, fulvic acid-like substances and tyrosine-like proteins under

314

various salinity conditions. The EEM plot also showed that intensities of protein-like

315

substance (II; Ex = 250-280 nm, Em < 380 nm) and tyrosine-like substances (IV; Ex = 220-

316

250 nm, Em = 330-380 nm)45 were increased by 25.1%, 14.7%, 24.4%, and 5.9%, 8.0%,

317

16.4%, respectively at 0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4 M NaCl compared to control, respectively.

318

However, peak intensities of humic-like substance (I; Ex > 280 nm, Em > 380 nm) and fulvic

319

acid-like substance (III; Ex = 220-250 nm, Em > 380 nm)45 were reduced by 36.8%, 34.3%,

320

and 17.4%, 9.6% at 1.2 M and 2.4 M NaCl compared to control, respectively (Figure 3). The

321

increase in peak intensity of humic-like substance at 0.6 M NaCl compared to control

322

probably caused by the decomposition of dead cells and macromolecular organics such as

323

proteins and polysaccharides.46

324 13



325

Metabolic activities of salinity-stressed bacteria. Respiratory activity were increased by

326

8.3%, 85.5%, and 87.0% at 0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4 M NaCl compared to control, respectively

327

(Figure 4a). The CTC assay indicates the respiratory activity of bacterial cells. A colorless

328

CTC staining dye is converted to red-fluorescent precipitate by the electron transport system

329

of respiratory-active bacterial cells.47 The increase of CTC-positive cells can be caused by the

330

development of cell population and the elevated respiratory-active state of cells.47 In our

331

study, CTC-positive cell numbers were reduced, and a decrease in total number of bacteria

332

cells under high salt concentrations were observed. However, the ratio between CTC-positive

333

cell number and total cell numbers were significantly increased at 1.2 M and 2.4 M NaCl

334

concentrations. This means the salinity-stressed bacteria still maintain respiratory activity and

335

the result was consistent with the increase in cell viability (Table 1). At 1.2 M and 2.4 M

336

NaCl, bacterial activation was highly increased as compared to control and 0.6 M NaCl. This

337

could be a result of the adaptation mechanism of bacteria to hyper-osmotic shock

338

environment. Gram-negative bacteria counteract to high salinity by stimulation of potassium

339

(K+) uptake and accumulation of osmoprotectant such as glycine betaine, proline.13 The K+

340

uptake is performed via K+ transport systems associated with adenosine triphosphate (ATP)

341

hydrolysis; therefore, elevated osmolarity can increase the respiratory activity to generate

342

ATP to be used for K+ uptake. To measure the bacterial ability to proliferate, DNA synthesis

343

activity of salinity stressed bacteria was measured by flow cytometric detection of

344

incorporated EdU, which is a thymidine analogue, during DNA synthesis.48 Salinity-stressed

345

bacteria in log phase showed that the ability of DNA synthesis for bacteria proliferation was

346

inhibited by 58.9%, 82.9%, and 82.3% at 0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4 M NaCl compared to control,

347

respectively. However, they still have activity to continue cell proliferation (Figure 4b).

348

14


Page 14 of 34

Page 15 of 34


349

Biofilm formation on NF membrane coupons. As compared to control, total cell numbers

350

of biofilm formed on NF membrane coupons were reduced by 0.2-log, 1.7-log, and 1.8-log at

351

0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4 M NaCl, respectively (Figure 5a). However, the cell viability was

352

18.9%, 7.7%, 30.2%, and 39.4% at control (0.3 M), 0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4 M NaCl,

353

respectively (Figure 5b). The results were highly consistent with the in-vitro assay which

354

showed the effect of salt concentration on bacteria growth and viability (Table 1). The

355

concentrations of carbohydrate and protein per total cell numbers were increased by more

356

than 96% at 1.2 M and 2.4 M NaCl compared to control, respectively; and the ratio between

357

protein and carbohydrate (PN/CH) was 2.4, 2.1, 2.4, and 2.6 at control, 0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4

358

M NaCl, respectively. Thus, protein produced by salinity-stressed bacteria was the dominant

359

compounds in biofilm. The concentration of protein (ng/cells) that was released from the

360

bacterial cells were highly correlated with NaCl concentration (Rs=1, P < 0.05), however,

361

carbohydrate concentration did not show linear correlation with NaCl concentration (Rs=0.8,

362

p > 0.05). These results were similar to salinity-stressed bacteria in suspension. The FTIR

363

peaks of biofilm formed on NF membrane coupons also showed that the peak intensities of

364

control sample were entirely smaller than other conditions (Figure 6). In particular, among

365

the FTIR peaks, the specific peak that assigned as RNA backbone (970 cm-1; νC-C, νP-O-P),

366

proteins/carbohydrates/esters (1153/1172 cm-1; νsC-OH, νC-O), proteins (1568-1531 cm-

367

1

368

increased at high NaCl concentrations (Table 2). EEM peaks showed that fulvic acid (III) and

369

tyrosine-like proteins (IV) were dominant on the membrane surfaces (Figure S2). The ratio

370

between tyrosine-like proteins and humic acid indicated that aromatic protein-like substances

371

such as tyrosine-like proteins (IV) were more influential than protein-like substances (II) to

372

cause biofilm (Table 3). The biofilm coverage (%) was reduced by 11.7% and 60.9% at 1.2 M

373

and 2.4 M NaCl, while at 0.6 M NaCl concentration, the biofilm coverage was increased by

/1693-1627 cm-1; Amide I/Amide II), hydroxyl (3000-3400 cm-1; -OH) were significantly

15



374

14.9% compared to control, respectively. However, the biomass surface to bio-volume ratio

375

(µm2/µm3), calculated by dividing the summation of biomass surface (µm2) by biovolume

376

(µm3) were 3.5 (±0.7), 3.7 (±0.8), 3.4 (±0.5), and 3.3 (±0.5) at control, 0.6 M, 1.2 M, 2.4 M

377

NaCl, respectively (Table S3). The biomass surface to bio-volume ratio indicates the actual

378

fraction of biofilm exposed to the nutrient on the membrane surface. Initially bacteria

379

exposed to the nutrient and the biofilm is matured to adapt to the environment. Therefore, the

380

biomass surface to bio-volume ratio may indicate the adaptation of biofilm to the

381

environment.49 The results indicated that although less biofilm was formed on NF membrane

382

coupons, the surface to bio-volume ratio was not affected since salinity-stressed bacteria

383

adapted to the high salinity by maintaining its membrane integrity and metabolic activity.

384 385

This study investigated the effect of salinity on physiological characteristics of Vibrio sp. B2

386

and the possible impact on biofilm formation on NF membrane coupon. We highlight that

387

although the total cell numbers are lower in higher salinity environment, the bacteria maintain

388

cell integrity, remain active and can overproduce EPS which may have high potential to cause

389

severe biofilm formation in the high recovery desalination system. The results can be

390

explained by uptake K+ ion with the active respiratory activity and subsequent production of

391

osmoprotectants as osmoadaptation mechanisms of bacteria to osmotic stress.12, 13 However,

392

in an actual desalination system, parameters such as feed water compositions,50, 51 membrane

393

properties,52 and hydrodynamic conditions (i.e. flux and cross-flow velocity)26, 27 can greatly

394

contribute to the membrane fouling dynamics. It has been reported from membrane autopsies

395

study that organic and biofouling mainly occurred at the lead membrane element, while more

396

serious organic fouling, scaling, and still significant biofouling were detected at the

397

concentrated brine end of an conventional RO system.51 In further study, the evaluation of

398

membrane biofouling for high recovery desalination process under long term operation of 16


Page 16 of 34

Page 17 of 34


399

membrane system is required. In addition, based on the results from the above studies on

400

physiological responses of salinity-stressed bacteria, it is predicted that the biofilm structures

401

and compositions would vary along the membrane modules and stages in the high recovery

402

desalination process since the concentration of salts increases from the inlet to outlet as water

403

is recovered. Thus, the biofilm with high quantity of active bacteria cells embedded in matrix

404

of EPS is expected at the first stage (i.e. inlet). On the other hand, the biofilm at the last stage

405

(i.e. outlet) would have greater amount of EPS especially protein and eDNA but with lower

406

total number of cells. Hence, different fouling control or cleaning strategies need to be

407

adopted. It is proposed to use the concentrated brine, i.e. × 4 times the original concentration

408

at 75% recovery, as an agent for osmotic-shock to control membrane fouling in the first stage.

409

The effect of abrupt change in salinity level has shown to reduce the viability and cell

410

membrane integrity of bacteria. The direct osmosis backwash cleaning technique has been

411

proposed for RO fouling control in water reuse application by periodical injections of high

412

salinity solution made from industrial grade NaCl (136 kg/m3 NaCl) to the feed water which

413

then induce the reverse flow of RO permeate that can lift and sweep off foulants from the

414

membrane surface.53 However, this method is not suitable for the last stage, which is at high

415

salinity level. Here, enzyme based cleaning agent54 or biosurfactant45 that target at protein

416

removal is desired.

417 418

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

419

This research grant is supported by the Singapore National Research Foundation,

420

administered by PUB. The Singapore Membrane Technology Centre, Nanyang Environment

421

and Water Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University is supported by the

422

Economic Development Board of Singapore.

423 17



424

Supporting Information. The compositions of marine broth 2261 (Table S1), characteristics

425

of NF membrane (Table S2), characteristics of biofilm formed on NF membrane coupons

426

(Table S3), cell viability and esterase activity of salinity-stressed bacteria in various NaCl

427

concentrations ranging from 0.3 M to 6.0 M NaCl (Figure S1), EEM plot of EPS extracted

428

from biofilm formed on NF membrane coupons (Figure S2) are provided.

429 430

REFERENCES

431

(1) Morillo, J.; Usero, J.; Rosado, D.; El Bakouri, H.; Riaza, A.; Bernaola, F.-J., Comparative

432

study of brine management technologies for desalination plants. Desalination 2014, 336, 32-

433

49.

434

(2) Pérez-González, A.; Ibáñez, R.; Gómez, P.; Urtiaga, A. M.; Ortiz, I.; Irabien, J. A.,

435

Nanofiltration separation of polyvalent and monovalent anions in desalination brines. J.

436

Membr. Sci. 2015, 473, 16-27.

437

(3) Greenlee, L. F.; Lawler, D. F.; Freeman, B. D.; Marrot, B.; Moulin, P., Reverse osmosis

438

desalination: Water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Res. 2009, 43, (9),

439

2317-2348.

440

(4) Li, J.; Guan, Y.; Cheng, F.; Liu, Y., Treatment of high salinity brines by direct contact

441

membrane distillation: Effect of membrane characteristics and salinity. Chemosphere 2015,

442

140, 143-149.

443

(5) Minier-Matar, J.; Hussain, A.; Janson, A.; Benyahia, F.; Adham, S., Field evaluation of

444

membrane distillation technologies for desalination of highly saline brines. Desalination

445

2014, 351, 101-108.

446

(6) Martinetti, C. R.; Childress, A. E.; Cath, T. Y., High recovery of concentrated RO brines

447

using forward osmosis and membrane distillation. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 331, (1–2), 31-39.

448

(7) Chong, T. H.; Loo, S.-L.; Krantz, W. B., Energy-efficient reverse osmosis desalination 18


Page 18 of 34

Page 19 of 34


449

process. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 473, 177-188.

450

(8) Chong, T. H.; Loo, S.-L.; Fane, A. G.; Krantz, W. B., Energy-efficient reverse osmosis

451

desalination: Effect of retentate recycle and pump and energy recovery device efficiencies.

452

Desalination 2015, 366, 15-31.

453

(9) Matin, A.; Khan, Z.; Zaidi, S. M. J.; Boyce, M. C., Biofouling in reverse osmosis

454

membranes for seawater desalination: Phenomena and prevention. Desalination 2011, 281, 1-

455

16.

456

(10) Nguyen, T.; Roddick, F.A.; Fan, L., Biofouling of water treatment membranes: A review

457

of the underlying causes, monitoring techniques and control measures. Membranes 2012, 2,

458

(4), 804-840.

459

(11) Bazire, A.; Diab, F.; Jebbar, M.; Haras, D., Influence of high salinity on biofilm

460

formation and benzoate assimilation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Ind. Microbiol.

461

Biotechnol. 2007, 34, (1), 5-8.

462

(12) Kempf, B.; Bremer, E., Uptake and synthesis of compatible solutes as microbial stress

463

responses to high-osmolality environments. Arch. Microbiol. 1998, 170, (5), 319-30.

464

(13) Sleator, R. D.; Hill, C., Bacterial osmoadaptation: the role of osmolytes in bacterial

465

stress and virulence. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 26, (1), 49-71.

466

(14) Jang, D.; Hwang, Y.; Shin, H.; Lee, W., Effects of salinity on the characteristics of

467

biomass and membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 141, 50-

468

56.

469

(15) Guo, X.; Miao, Y.; Wu, B.; Ye, L.; Yu, H.; Liu, S.; Zhang, X.-x., Correlation between

470

microbial community structure and biofouling as determined by analysis of microbial

471

community dynamics. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 197, 99-105.

472

(16) Reid, E.; Liu, X.; Judd, S. J., Effect of high salinity on activated sludge characteristics

473

and membrane permeability in an immersed membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 283, 19



474

(1–2), 164-171.

475

(17) Wang, Z.; Gao, M.; Wang, Z.; She, Z.; Chang, Q.; Sun, C.; Zhang, J.; Ren, Y.; Yang, N.,

476

Effect of salinity on extracellular polymeric substances of activated sludge from an anoxic–

477

aerobic sequencing batch reactor. Chemosphere 2013, 93, (11), 2789-2795.

478

(18) Vyrides, I.; Stuckey, D. C., Adaptation of anaerobic biomass to saline conditions: Role of

479

compatible solutes and extracellular polysaccharides. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2009, 44, (1),

480

46-51.

481

(19) Stanley, N. R.; Lazazzera, B. A., Environmental signals and regulatory pathways that

482

influence biofilm formation. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 52, (4), 917-924.

483

(20) Yang, H.-L.; Pan, J. R.; Huang, C.; Lin, J. C.-T., The effect of feed salinity on the

484

biofouling dynamics of seawater desalination. Biofouling 2011, 27, (5), 561-567.

485

(21) Chong, T. H.; Wong, F. S.; Fane, A. G., The effect of imposed flux on biofouling in

486

reverse osmosis: Role of concentration polarisation and biofilm enhanced osmotic pressure

487

phenomena. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325, (2), 840-850.

488

(22) Suwarno, S. R.; Chen, X.; Chong, T. H.; McDougald, D.; Cohen, Y.; Rice, S. A.; Fane, A.

489

G., Biofouling in reverse osmosis processes: The roles of flux, crossflow velocity and

490

concentration polarization in biofilm development. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 467, (0), 116-125.

491

(23) Suwarno, S. R.; Chen, X.; Chong, T. H.; Puspitasari, V. L.; McDougald, D.; Cohen, Y.;

492

Rice, S. A.; Fane, A. G., The impact of flux and spacers on biofilm development on reverse

493

osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 405–406, 219-232.

494

(24) Bucs, S. S.; Valladares Linares, R.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kruithof, J. C.;

495

Vrouwenvelder, J. S., Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel

496

pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems. Water Res. 2014, 67,

497

227-242.

498

(25) Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Hinrichs, C.; van der Meer, W. G. J.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; 20


Page 20 of 34

Page 21 of 34


499

Kruithof, J. C., Pressure drop increase by biofilm accumulation in spiral wound RO and NF

500

membrane systems: Role of substrate concentration, flow velocity, substrate load and flow

501

direction. Biofouling 2009, 25, (6), 543-555.

502

(26) Al Ashhab, A.; Gillor, O.; Herzberg, M., Biofouling of reverse-osmosis membranes

503

under different shear rates during tertiary wastewater desalination: Microbial community

504

composition. Water Res. 2014, 67, 86-95.

505

(27) Mohammadi, T.; Kazemi Moghadam, M.; Madaeni, S. S., Hydrodynamic factors

506

affecting flux and fouling during reverse osmosis of seawater. Desalination 2003, 151, (3),

507

239-245.

508

(28) Herzberg, M.; Elimelech, M., Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: Role of

509

biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 295, (1–2), 11-20.

510

(29) Merritt, J. H.; Kadouri, D. E.; O'Toole, G. A., Growing and analyzing static biofilms. In

511

Current Protocols in Microbiology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: 2005.

512

(30) Stepanović, S.; Vuković, D.; Dakić, I.; Savić, B.; Švabić-Vlahović, M., A modified

513

microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J. Microbiol.

514

Methods 2000, 40, (2), 175-179.

515

(31) Chon, K.; Cho, J.; Shon, H. K., Fouling characteristics of a membrane bioreactor and

516

nanofiltration hybrid system for municipal wastewater reclamation. Bioresour. Technol. 2013,

517

130, 239-247.

518

(32) Mehdipour, S.; Vatanpour, V.; Kariminia, H.-R., Influence of ion interaction on lead

519

removal by a polyamide nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2015, 362, 84-92.

520

(33) Bellona, C.; Marts, M.; Drewes, J. E., The effect of organic membrane fouling on the

521

properties and rejection characteristics of nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol.

522

2010, 74, (1), 44-54.

523

(34) Amor, K. B.; Breeuwer, P.; Verbaarschot, P.; Rombouts, F. M.; Akkermans, A. D. L.; De 21



524

Vos, W. M.; Abee, T., Multiparametric flow cytometry and cell sorting for the assessment of

525

viable, injured, and dead Bifidobacterium cells during bile salt stress. Appl. Environ.

526

Microbiol. 2002, 68, (11), 5209-5216.

527

(35) Liu, H.; Fang, H. H. P., Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of

528

sludges. J. Biotechnol. 2002, 95, (3), 249-256.

529

(36) Masuko, T.; Minami, A.; Iwasaki, N.; Majima, T.; Nishimura, S.-I.; Lee, Y. C.,

530

Carbohydrate analysis by a phenol–sulfuric acid method in microplate format. Anal. Biochem.

531

2005, 339, (1), 69-72.

532

(37) Zhang, Z.-J.; Chen, S.-H.; Wang, S.-M.; Luo, H.-Y., Characterization of extracellular

533

polymeric substances from biofilm in the process of starting-up a partial nitrification process

534

under salt stress. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 89, (5), 1563-1571.

535

(38) Lee, J.; Kim, I. S., Microbial community in seawater reverse osmosis and rapid

536

diagnosis of membrane biofouling. Desalination 2011, 273, (1), 118-126.

537

(39) Levi, A.; Bar-Zeev, E.; Elifantz, H.; Berman, T.; Berman-Frank, I., Characterization of

538

microbial communities in water and biofilms along a large scale SWRO desalination facility:

539

Site-specific prerequisite for biofouling treatments. Desalination 2016, 378, 44-52.

540

(40) Luo, W.; Phan, H. V.; Hai, F. I.; Price, W. E.; Guo, W.; Ngo, H. H.; Yamamoto, K.;

541

Nghiem, L. D., Effects of salinity build-up on the performance and bacterial community

542

structure of a membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 200, 305-310.

543

(41) Zhang, M.; Jiang, S.; Tanuwidjaja, D.; Voutchkov, N.; Hoek, E. M. V.; Cai, B.,

544

Composition and variability of biofouling organisms in seawater reverse osmosis desalination

545

plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, (13), 4390-4398.

546

(42) Sévin, D. C.; Sauer, U., Ubiquinone accumulation improves osmotic-stress tolerance in

547

Escherichia coli. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, (4), 266-272.

548

(43) Joghee, N. N.; Jayaraman, G., Biochemical changes induced by salt stress in halotolerant 22


Page 22 of 34

Page 23 of 34


549

bacterial isolates are media dependent as well as species specific. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol.

550

2016, 46, (1), 8-14.

551

(44) Strøm, A. R., Osmoregulation in the model organism Escherichia coli: genes governing

552

the synthesis of glycine betaine and trehalose and their use in metabolic engineering of stress

553

tolerance. J. Biosci. 1998, 23, (4), 437.

554

(45) Kim, L. H.; Jung, Y.; Yu, H.-W.; Chae, K.-J.; Kim, I. S., Physicochemical interactions

555

between rhamnolipids and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Layers. Environ. Sci. Technol.

556

2015, 49, (6), 3718-3726.

557

(46) Qu, F.; Liang, H.; He, J.; Ma, J.; Wang, Z.; Yu, H.; Li, G., Characterization of dissolved

558

extracellular organic matter (dEOM) and bound extracellular organic matter (bEOM) of

559

Microcystis aeruginosa and their impacts on UF membrane fouling. Water Res. 2012, 46, (9),

560

2881-2890.

561

(47) Créach, V.; Baudoux, A.-C.; Bertru, G.; Rouzic, B. L., Direct estimate of active bacteria:

562

CTC use and limitations. J. Microbiol. Methods 2003, 52, (1), 19-28.

563

(48) Morishige, Y.; Fujimori, K.; Amano, F., Use of flow cytometry for quantitative analysis

564

of metabolism of viable but non-culturable (VBNC) Salmonella. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 38,

565

(9), 1255-1264.

566

(49) Heydorn, A.; Nielsen, A. T.; Hentzer, M.; Sternberg, C.; Givskov, M.; Ersbøll, B. K.;

567

Molin, S., Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program comstat.

568

Microbiology 2000, 146, (10), 2395-2407.

569

(50) Peng, W.; Escobar, I. C.; White, D. B., Effects of water chemistries and properties of

570

membrane on the performance and fouling—a model development study. J. Membr. Sci. 2004,

571

238, (1–2), 33-46.

572

(51) Khan, M. T.; Busch, M.; Molina, V. G.; Emwas, A.-H.; Aubry, C.; Croue, J.-P., How

573

different is the composition of the fouling layer of wastewater reuse and seawater 23



574

desalination RO membranes? Water Res. 2014, 59, 271-282.

575

(52) Lalia, B. S.; Kochkodan, V.; Hashaikeh, R.; Hilal, N., A review on membrane fabrication:

576

Structure, properties and performance relationship. Desalination 2013, 326, 77-95.

577

(53) Qin, J.-J.; Oo, M. H.; Kekre, K. A.; Liberman, B., Development of novel backwash

578

cleaning technique for reverse osmosis in reclamation of secondary effluent. J. Membr. Sci.

579

2010, 346, (1), 8-14.

580

(54) Kim, L. H.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, C.-M.; Shin, M. S.; Kook, S.; Kim, I. S., Effects of

581

enzymatic treatment on the reduction of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from

582

biofouled membranes. Desalination Water Treat. 2013, 51, (31-33), 6355-6361.

583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 24


Page 24 of 34

Page 25 of 34


600 601

Figure 1. (a) Adherence of isolated bacteria on microtiter plate. Bacteria isolated from

602

biofouled membrane (BF), brine (B), and seawater (S). (b) Potential of selected bacteria to

603

form biofilm on NF membrane (n=3).

604 605

25



606 607

Figure 2. Effects of abrupt changes in salt concentrations on (a) bacterial growth (OD600), (b)

608

viability, and (c) bacterial membrane esterase activity (n=3).

26


Page 26 of 34

Page 27 of 34


609

610

Figure 3. Excitation-emission matrix (EEM) of EPS extracted from salinity-stressed bacteria

611

at (a) control (0.3 M), (b) 0.6 M, (c) 1.2 M, and (d) 2.4 M NaCl. I : humic-like matter; II,

612

protein-like matter; III, fulvic acid-like substances; IV, tyrosine like proteins (n=3).

613 614 615 616 617 618

27



619

620

Figure 4. Metabolic activities of salinity-stressed bacteria, (a) respiratory activity compared

621

to total cell numbers (b) proliferation activity (%) of bacteria at control (0.3 M), 0.6 M, 1.2 M,

622

and 2.4 M NaCl (n=3).

623

624

28


Page 28 of 34

Page 29 of 34


625 626

Figure 5. Biofilm-forming potential of salinity-stressed bacterium, Vibrio sp. B2 on NF

627

membrane coupons, (a) total attached cell numbers, (b) the ratio of live cells to total cell

628

numbers, (c) EPS concentrations (n=3).

29



629 630

Figure 6. ATR-FTIR spectra of biofilm-formed NF membrane coupons caused by salinity-

631

stressed bacteria at control (0.3 M), 0.6 M, 1.2 M, and 2.4 M NaCl (n=3).

632

633

634

635

636

637

638

30


Page 30 of 34

Page 31 of 34

639


Table 1. Effects of NaCl concentrations on physiological characteristics of Vibrio sp. B2 NaCl concentration (M) Parameters Control (0.3) Total cell number (cells/mL)

640

7

8.3 × 10

5

0.6

1.2 7

8.1 × 10

6

2.4 4

8.3 × 10

4

4.6 × 10

4 3

(±7.1 × 10 )

(±3.5 × 10 )

(±3.3 × 10 )

(±6.1 × 10 )

Maximum specific growth rate (h-1)

0.086

0.062

0.013

0.009

Cell viability (Live %)

2.9 (±0.8)

2.0 (±0.7)

78.7 (±1.6)

74.1 (±3.8)

Esterase activity (cFDA %)

41.8 (±3.3)

50.7 (±6.7)

78.4 (±2.4)

79.2 (±1.0)

Carbohydrate (ng/cells)

1.6 × 10-4 (±5.8 × 10-6)

1.5 × 10-4 (±3.1 × 10-5)

1.8 × 10-4 (±6.8 × 10-6)

2.2 × 10-4 (±1.9 × 10-5)

Protein (ng/cells)

1.7 × 10-3 (±1.1 × 10-5)

2.0 × 10-3 (±3.0 × 10-4)

2.0 (±9.2 × 10-2)

3.6 (±0.3)

eDNA (ng/cells)

9.3 × 10-4 (±3.4 × 10-4)

9.4 × 10-4 (±4.2 × 10-4)

2.4 × 10-1 (±6.3× 10-2)

2.1 × 10-1 (±9.0 × 10-2)

Zeta potential (mV)a

-8.5 (±0.2)

-8.1 (±0.6)

-18.5 (±0.6)

-18.6 (±0.2)

a

pH 7, 25 °C (n=9)

641

31



Page 32 of 34

Table 2. Assignments of FTIR spectra of biofouled membranes which was formed by salinity-stressed bacteria Wavenumber (cm-1)

Assignment

970

νC-C, νP-O-P

RNA backbone

νsC-OH, νC-O

Proteins, carbohydrates, esters

1153 1172 1568-1531 1693-1627 3000-3400

Amide II (δN-H coupled with νC-N) Amide I (νC=O coupled with δN-H), δH2O Hydroxyl (-OH)

Principal compounds and/or functions

Absorbance Control (0.3 M)

0.6 M

1.2 M

2.4 M

0.077

0.144

0.130

0.176

-0.038

0.018

0.118

0.164

-0.014

0.048

0.106

0.150

Proteins

0.092

0.169

0.162

0.208

Proteins, water

0.092

0.165

0.162

0.209

-

0.079

0.155

0.174

0.223

32


Page 33 of 34


Table 3. EEM peak intensities of extracted EPS from salinity-stressed bacteria or biofilms

642

NaCl concentration (M) Control (0.3)

643

a

Salinity-stressed bacterial suspension

Biofilms

Ia

II

III

IV

II/IV

II/I

IV/I

I

II

III

IV

II/IV

II/I

IV/I

251.8

469.4

644.8

784.3

0.6

1.9

3.1

171.2

148.7

419.7

307.4

0.5

0.9

1.8

0.6

316.1

587.2

672.3

830.8

0.7

1.9

2.6

150.3

144.3

321.6

228.1

0.6

1.0

1.5

1.2

159.0

538.3

532.8

846.8

0.6

3.4

5.3

100.5

101.1

321.6

284.2

0.4

1.0

2.8

2.4

165.4

584.0

583.0

912.8

0.6

3.5

5.5

99.5

88.7

308.4

228.1

0.4

0.9

2.3

humic-like matter; II, protein-like matter; III, fulvic acid-like substances; IV, tyrosine like proteins

644 645

33



646

TOC/Abstract Art

647 648 649

34


Page 34 of 34

Physiological Responses of Salinity-Stressed ... - ACS Publications

Recommend Documents