Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN
Article
Identification of Phenolic Compounds in Red and Green Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) Hulls (Exo- and Mesocarp) by HPLC-DAD-ESI-(HR)-MS
n
Sevcan Er#an, Özlem Güçlü Üstünda#, Reinhold Carle, and Ralf M. Schweiggert J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01745 • Publication Date (Web): 11 Jun 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 12, 2016
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Identification of Phenolic Compounds in Red and Green Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) Hulls (Exo- and Mesocarp) by HPLC-DAD-ESI-(HR)-MSn
Sevcan Erşan,†, ‡ Özlem Güçlü Üstündağ,‡ Reinhold Carle,†,§ and Ralf M. Schweiggert†*
†
Chair of Plant Foodstuff Technology and Analysis, Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 25, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany ‡
§
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Yeditepe University, 26 Ağustos Yerleşimi, Kayışdağı Cad., 34755, Istanbul, Turkey
Biological Science Department, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80257, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
*
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Phone +49 711 459 22995, Fax: +49 711 459 24110, Email:
[email protected] ACS Paragon Plus Environment
1
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 2 of 35
1
ABSTRACT
2
Phenolic constituents of the non-lignified red and green pistachio hulls (exo- and
3
mesocarp) were assessed by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn as well as by HR-MS. A total of 66
4
compounds was identified in the respective aqueous methanolic extracts. Among them,
5
gallic acid, monogalloyl glucoside, monogalloyl quinic acid, penta-O-galloyl-β-D-
6
glucose, hexagalloyl hexose, quercetin 3-O-galactoside, quercetin 3-O-glucoside,
7
quercetin 3-O-glucuronide, and (17:1)-, (13:0)-, (13:1)-anacardic acids were detected at
8
highest signal intensity. The main difference between red and green hulls was the
9
presence of anthocyanins in the former ones. Differently galloylated hydrolyzable
10
tannins, anthocyanins, and minor anacardic acids were identified for the first time.
11
Pistachio hulls were thus shown to be a source of structurally diverse and potentially
12
bioactive phenolic compounds. They therefore represent a valuable by-product of
13
pistachio processing having potential for further utilization as raw material for the
14
recovery of pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and chemical products.
15 16
Keywords: Pistacia vera L., waste, by-product, gallotannin, flavonoid, quercetin
17
glycoside, anthocyanin, anacardic acid, mass spectrometry, high resolution mass
18
spectrometry, bioactive.
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
19
INTRODUCTION
20
Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) seeds are an important commercial crop, whose annual
21
production has doubled during the past decade to reach a worldwide production of
22
approx. 1 million tons in 2013. Top producing countries are Iran followed by the USA
23
and Turkey.1 Although the fruit of the pistachio tree is botanically considered a drupe,
24
pistachio seeds are often regarded as “nuts”, being most commonly consumed as roasted
25
and salted snack food. In addition, a certain amount of pistachio seeds is used as food
26
ingredient, e.g., in pastry, ice-cream, chocolate, confectionary production, and
27
mortadella. Pistachio drupes consist of an edible seed characterized by light-green
28
cotyledons (kernels), a mauvish seed coat (testa) covered by a creamy lignified shell
29
(endocarp), and a green to yellow-red colored outer hull (exo- and mesocarp) depending
30
on the degree of ripeness.2 According to their final use, they are processed to separate
31
either the non-lignified hull for snack pistachios or the entire hull, shell, and seed coat to
32
obtain the isolated kernels.3,4 In both cases, significant amounts of waste accrue having
33
no or low commercial value, which need to be disposed at the processor’s expense.
34
Therefore, valorization of pistachio by-products is of great interest, so far being
35
hampered by missing identification of valuable target compounds which merit utilization.
36
Extracts of pistachio outer hull, the main by-product of pistachio processing, have been
37
shown to exert antioxidant,5–8 antimicrobial,8–10 antimutagenic8 and cytoprotective6 as
38
well as potential antitumor11 and anticancer activities.12 Despite such potent bioactivities,
39
the phytochemicals in the pistachio hull remain to be comprehensively characterized.
40
Only a limited number of previous studies has aimed at elucidating the phenolic profiles 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 4 of 35
41
of pistachio hulls (either ripe exocarp or green exo- and mesocarp), suggesting phenolic
42
acids (gallic, protocatechuic, hydroxybenzoic, p-coumaric, and vanillic acids) and
43
flavonoids (quercetin glycosides, isorhamnetin glycosides, naringenin, eriodictyol, and
44
catechin) represent the main phenolic constituents, as only being identified by HPLC-
45
DAD-FLD or HPLC-DAD-MS,5,6 together with (13:0)-, (13:1)-, (15:0)-, (15:1)-, and
46
(17:1)-anacardic acids.13 Since pistachio belongs to the Anacardiaceae, a wide array of
47
phenolic compounds is to be expected in pistachio hull.14 For instance, flavonol
48
glycosides, gallotannins, and specific phenolic lipids have been reported in other
49
members of the Anacardiaceae such as mango (Mangifera indica L.),15–17 Brazilian
50
pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi),18 and cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.).19
51
Thus, we sought to provide a comprehensive analysis of the phenolic constituents present
52
in pistachio hull using highly sensitive tools such as HR-MSn, particularly, aiming at the
53
further utilization of pistachio hull as a source of potent phenolic bioactives.
54
Pistachio drupes are harvested at different maturity stages based on their desired
55
properties and final use. A high portion of pistachio drupes are harvested red colored at
56
full maturity, and preferentially used for the production of snack food, because their fully
57
developed taste and high shell splitting ratio are important quality traits. However, green
58
drupes, i.e. early-harvested drupes, are desired to produce intensely green colored kernels
59
for pastry and confectionary industry of high market value. Thus, both green and red
60
pistachio hulls, either in fresh or dried form depending of agricultural practices of the
61
country, can be obtained in high amounts as by-products of pistachio processing.
62
Particularly, dried pistachio hulls accrue in large amounts from numerous processors,
63
because drying allows the off-season processing of the otherwise highly perishable
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
64
pistachio drupes. Hitherto, no attention has been given to their compositional differences,
65
and a lack of unambiguous sample descriptions in previous studies often hampers their
66
comparative consideration.5–8 Therefore, in this study, we additionally sought to compare
67
the phenolic profiles of red and green pistachio hull as a further reference for their
68
utilization as a phenolic source.
69
For the above mentioned purposes, dried red and green hulls were obtained from a
70
commercial pistachio processor to be extracted with aqueous methanol yielding phenolic-
71
rich samples. Subsequently, these were screened for bioactive phenolic compounds by
72
HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn and HPLC-HR-MS.
73
MATERIALS AND METHODS
74
Reagents
75
Gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, penta-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose, and (15:0)-anacardic acid
76
were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich Chemie (Steinheim, Germany). β-Glucogallin (1-O-
77
galloyl β-D-glucopyranose) was from PhytoLab (Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany), quercetin
78
3-O-glucuronide, quercetin 3-O-glucoside, quercetin 3-O-galactoside, myricetin 3-O-
79
galactoside and cyanidin 3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside were from Extrasynthèse (Genay
80
Cedex, France). HPLC grade methanol from VWR (Darmstadt, Germany), analytical
81
grade formic acid from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), and deionized water were used
82
throughout the study.
83 84
Samples and sample preparation
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 35
85
Dried red and green pistachio drupes cv. ‘Uzun’ (Figure 1) were obtained from a
86
pistachio processor (Gaziantep, Turkey). Both red and green pistachio drupes were
87
harvested between August and September in 2013 in Gaziantep region of Turkey,
88
traditionally sun-dried to decrease their moisture contents to 4.6% ± 0.2% as determined
89
according to AOAC Official Method 934.0120 and stored for a year by the producer as
90
usual in Turkey. Commonly, moisture content of pistachio drupes during commercial
91
storage was reported to range from 40-50% in fresh form to 3-5% in dried form21.
92
Average air temperatures were between 3.4 °C and 28.6 °C for this region during the year
93
the drupes were stored with a relative humidity of 29.0-78.9%.22
94
Pistachio drupes were sampled in triplicate (each 500.0 g ± 0.1 g). Hulls and seeds were
95
separated manually and weighted. Proportions of hulls and seeds of the whole pistachio
96
drupe were approx. 20.5% and 37.4% on dry weight basis, respectively. Pistachio hulls
97
were subsequently ground using an A11 laboratory mill (IKA, Staufen, Germany).
98
Ground samples were stored at -20 °C until analyses.
99 100
Extraction of phenolics
101
Ground red and green pistachio hulls (1.00 g ± 0.01 g) were combined with 5 mL of
102
acidified (0.1% HCl, v/v) aqueous methanol (80%, v/v) and subjected to probe sonication
103
at 70% amplitude for 30 s. After centrifugation (1233 x g, 3 min), the supernatant was
104
collected and the solid residues were re-extracted four times as described above. The
105
combined methanolic extracts were evaporated to dryness in vacuo at 30 °C. Then, the
106
dried extract was dissolved in 1 mL of 50% aqueous methanol containing 1% (v/v)
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
107
formic acid and membrane-filtered (0.45 µm, regenerated cellulose) into amber vials
108
prior to HPLC analyses.
109 110
HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn analyses
111
An 1100 series HPLC system with G1322A degasser, a G1312A pump module, a
112
G1313A autosampler, a G1316A column thermostat and a G1315A diode array detector
113
(Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) was equipped with a 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm
114
particle size, 100 Å pore size Kinetex C18 core-shell reversed-phase column fitted with
115
4.6 mm x 2 mm i.d. SecurityGuard Ultra C18 guard column both from Phenomenex
116
(Aschaffenburg, Germany). Mobile phases were water for eluent A and methanol for
117
eluent B both containing 1% (v/v) formic acid. Chromatographic separation was achieved
118
at 35 °C column temperature, 1 mL/min flow rate, and using the following gradient
119
profile: isocratic at 2% B for 10 min, from 2-37% B in 27 min, isocratic at 37% B for 5
120
min, from 37-40% B in 18 min, from 40-60% B in 10 min, from 60-100% B in 20 min,
121
isocratic at 100% B for 14 min, from 100-2% B in 1 min followed by isocratic
122
conditioning at 2% B for 7 min prior to the next run. Total run time was 112 min and
123
injection volume was 5 µL.
124
For multi-stage mass spectrometry, the above described LC system was interfaced with
125
an Esquire 3000+ ion-trap mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany),
126
which had been fitted with an ESI source operated in positive ion mode for anthocyanins
127
and negative ion mode for all other analyses. Ion scan rate was in the range of m/z 100-
128
2000 at a scan speed of m/z 13,000/s. Nitrogen was used both as drying and nebulizing
129
gas at a flow rate of 11 mL/min and at pressure of 60 psi, respectively. Nebulizer 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 35
130
temperature was 365 °C. The potential on the capillary was set at ±2287 V for both
131
negative and positive ion modes. Helium at a pressure of 4 x 10-6 mbar was used for
132
collision induced dissociation (CID) at a fragmentation amplitude of 1.2 V. Ion
133
chromatograms were analyzed using Esquire Control software.
134 135
HPLC-ESI-HR-MS analyses
136
HPLC-HR-MS analyses were performed using micrOTOF-Q mass spectrometer (Bruker
137
Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) coupled to an Agilent 1200 series HPLC system operated
138
according to the above mentioned parameters. HR-MS was operated in negative ESI
139
mode with +2200 V capillary voltages. Ion scan rate was in the range of m/z 250-3000 at
140
a scan speed of m/z 12,900/s (at m/z 996.8). Nitrogen was used both as nebulizing and
141
drying gas at a pressure of 3.0 bar and a flow rate of 8 L/min, respectively. Drying gas
142
was heated to 300 °C. Instrument calibration was carried out according to the
143
manufacturer’s instructions using sodium formate. DataAnalysis 3.4 software was used to
144
generate molecular formulas based on accurate mass measurements.
145
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
146
Analysis of phenolic compounds by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn and HPLC-ESI-HR-MS
147
A total of 66 phenolic compounds was detected in pistachio hull extracts, representative
148
structures are presented in Figure 2. Monitoring was performed at different wavelengths
149
as shown in Figure 3. All analytical data obtained for the examined compounds are listed
150
in Table 1, including their retention times, UV absorption maxima, ESI-MSn
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
151
fragmentation pattern, and the respective high resolution mass-to-charge (m/z) signals.
152
The identification of the examined 66 compounds led to their allocation into three
153
structurally related groups, i.e., gallotannins, flavonoids, and anacardic acids
154 155
Gallotannins
156
Gallotannins represent a subgroup of hydrolyzable tannins, more specifically being esters
157
of at least one gallic acid molecule with polyols such as sugars, shikimic acids or quinic
158
acids.23 While gallic acid, 2, was tentatively identified by comparing the obtained
159
retention time, UV absorption and mass spectra to those of an authentic standard, a total
160
of 30 related gallic acid derivatives and gallotannins was identified in pistachio hull
161
extracts, mainly based on the formation of characteristic product ions at m/z 169 ([gallic
162
acid-H]-) and 125 ([gallic acid-CO2-H]-) as well as due to the specific neutral loss of a
163
dehydrated galloyl moiety (152 Da). The identification was corroborated by their UV
164
absorption spectra and high resolution MS data.
165 166
Galloyl hexoses
167
Compound 1 with a parent ion [M-H]- at m/z 331 revealed a daughter ion [M-H-162]- at
168
m/z 169 upon CID fragmentation, indicating the loss of a hexose moiety. It was identified
169
as 1-O-galloyl β-D-glucopyranose (β-glucogallin) after comparing its retention time, UV
170
absorption and mass spectra with those of an authentic standard. Glucogallin has already
171
been reported in many plants including other members of Anacardiaceae, such as
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 35
172
Brazilian pepper18 and mango,24 and is considered a primary metabolite and galloyl donor
173
for gallotannin biosynthesis.25,26
174
The parent ion [M-H]- at m/z 493 of compound 8 formed daughter ions [M-H-162]- at m/z
175
313 and [M-H-162-162]- at m/z 169. In agreement with its UV and high resolution MS
176
data, compound 8 was tentatively identified as a galloyl dihexose. Similar galloyl
177
dihexoses have been previously found in plant parts of other Anacardiaceae, namely in
178
sumac (Rhus coriaria L.).27 Compounds 6 and 7 exhibited both UV absorption spectra
179
and high resolution mass signals identical to those of compound 8 (Table 1). However,
180
their different fragmentation patterns indicated that they might represent distinct isomers
181
of galloyl dihexoses as reported previously.28 For instance, while predominant CID
182
daughter ions [M-H-180]- at m/z 313 and [M-H-324]- at m/z 169 were observed for
183
compounds 6 and 8, those of compound 7 were observed at m/z 271 ([M-H-162-60]-), at
184
m/z 211 ([M-H-162-120]-) and at m/z 313 ([M-H-180]-) (Table 1).24
185
Two further minor compounds, 14 and 16, were tentatively assigned as digalloyl hexoses
186
(m/z 483) due to loss of a dehydrated galloyl (152 Da) and a hexose (162 Da) moiety,
187
ultimately yielding gallic acid (m/z 169) as daughter ion. The loss of dehydrated galloyl
188
units (152 Da) may indicate depsidically linked gallic acids due to previously reported
189
predominance of galloyl fission in these types of linkages.29
190
The pseudo-molecular ions [M-H]- of three compounds, 31, 37 and 39, exhibited
191
sequential losses of galloyl moieties (152 Da) from their parent ions at m/z 787, 939 and
192
1091, respectively. These compounds were tentatively identified as tetra- , penta- , and
193
hexagalloyl hexose, respectively, based on their retention order, UV absorption maxima,
194
high resolution MS data, and MSn fragmentation pattern as compared with literature.30,31 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
195
The identity of compound 37 was further confirmed as penta-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose after
196
comparing its analytical data with that of the corresponding authentic standard.
197
Hexagalloyl hexose, 39, was the gallotannin having the highest degree of galloylation
198
that was detected as a separate peak, although several unresolved peaks eluting after 40
199
min (Figure 3) may be attributed to the presence of higher degrees of galloylated tannins.
200
The chromatographic separation of such highly galloylated gallotannins was previously
201
shown to be most intricate due to the increased number of possible gallotannin isomers
202
with the increase in the number of galloyl units.32 In agreement, our extracted ion
203
chromatograms containing the respective traces of penta-, hexa-, hepta-, octa-, and
204
nonagalloyl tannins are shown in Figure 4 to illustrate the increasing complexity of these
205
compounds and their related mass signals. In addition, characteristic doubly charged
206
pseudo-molecular ions [M-2H]2− and corresponding fragment ions [M-n × 152-2H]2−
207
with (n = 1–4) were observed in the region of highly galloylated gallotannins.18,33
208 209
Galloyl quinic acids
210
By analogy to differently galloylated hexoses, quinic acid was found to be galloylated to
211
different degrees. Compounds 4, 19, and 28 were tentatively identified as mono-, di- and
212
trigalloyl quinic acids due to sequential losses of galloyl moieties (152 Da) from their
213
parent ions at m/z 343, 495 and 647, respectively, and the formation of a final product ion
214
at m/z 191 (deprotonated quinic acid).34,35 HR-MS measured exact molecular masses
215
were also in good agreement with calculated masses of the respective galloyl quinic
216
acids, corroborating their identification (Table 1).
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 12 of 35
217
An additional quinic acid derivative (compound 29) was also tentatively identified due to
218
the formation of a putative product ion at m/z 191 (deprotonated quinic acid) upon CID
219
experiments. Compounds with different degrees of galloyl quinic acids were also
220
reported in Pistacia lentiscus L.,34 Myrtus communis L.,36 green tea (Camellia sinensis
221
L.), and tara (Caesalpinia spinosa (Molina) Kuntze).35
222 223
Galloyl shikimic acids
224
Three compounds, 9, 10 and 12, with identical UV absorption spectra, identical high
225
resolution MS data, and identical pseudo-molecular ions [M-H]- at m/z 325 were
226
characterized by the loss of 156 Da, yielding a daughter ion at m/z 169. In agreement with
227
our analytical data, these compounds were identified as monogalloyl shikimic acids. Two
228
compounds, 23 and 24, with pseudo-molecular ions [M-H]- at m/z 477 produced daughter
229
ions at m/z 325 due to the neutral loss [M-H-152]- of a putative galloyl moiety. Further
230
fragmentation of m/z 325 yielded spectra similar to the above mentioned monogalloyl
231
shikimic acids, 9, 10, and 12. In agreement with their chemical formula (Table 1),
232
compounds 23 and 24 were tentatively identified as the isomers of digalloyl shikimic
233
acids. Despite their uncommon presence in plants, differently galloylated shikimic acids
234
were previously reported in other plants,37–40 including Brazilian pepper from the
235
Anacardiaceae.18 As shikimic acid has been reported as a precursor of gallate synthesis,41
236
galloylated shikimic acids may represent intermediates for the biosynthesis of higher
237
molecular weight gallotannins.
238
The presence of gallotannins has previously been reported in other Anacardiaceae such as
239
mango30 and sumac.27 However, this is the first detailed report on pistachio hull 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
240
gallotannins. Behgar et al.42 previously reported the total “tannin content” of pistachio
241
hull as determined by an unspecific protein precipitation based radial diffusion assay.
242
Other gallic acid derivatives
243 244
Two peaks, 13 and 20, exhibited parent ions [M-H]- at m/z 321. Their CID fragmentations
245
resulted in product ions at m/z 169 and 125 characteristic of gallic acid. Thus, these
246
compounds were tentatively identified as digallic acids, although their differences on
247
linkages between the two galloyl moieties remain unknown despite their slightly different
248
UV absorption maxima (Table 1). The pseudo-molecular ion [M-H]- of compound 32 at
249
m/z 473 tentatively indicated the presence of a trigallic acid due to sequential loss of two
250
galloyl moieties, yielding product ions specific for gallic acid. We were unable to provide
251
evidence that these three compounds, 13, 20, and 32, represented depsides, although
252
depsidically linked gallic acids were previously found in tanoak acorns (Notholithocarpus
253
densiflorus (Hook. & Arn. ) Manos, Cannon & S. H. Oh)28 and Anacardiaceae such as
254
sumac,27 mango peel31 as well as in Rhus chinensis Mill. leaves, a traditional Chinese
255
herb.43
256
Compound 15 exhibited a parent ion [M-H]- at m/z 183 with a corresponding
257
demethylated product ion [M-H-15]- at m/z 168, thus being tentatively assigned as methyl
258
gallate in agreement with previous reports.31 Similarly, compound 36 with a parent ion at
259
m/z 335 was identified as methyl digallate due to loss of a digalloyl moiety during CID.
260
In addition, a product ion [M-H-152]- at m/z 183 (methyl gallate) was observed in the
261
MSn spectra. Noteworthy, methyl gallate, 15, and methyl digallate, 36, may represent
262
potential artefacts, resulting from methanolysis of depsidically linked gallotannins in the 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 14 of 35
263
course of extraction and analysis.29,35 In agreement, an increase in both peak area and
264
height of compound 15 and 36 was observed upon re-analysis of methanolic extracts kept
265
at room temperature for 24 h (data not shown).
266
Compound 26 produced a parent ion [M-H]- at m/z 319 and its HR-MS measured exact
267
molecular mass revealed a good fit to luteic acid, a digallic acid with an additional C-C
268
bond between its benzene rings (Table 1). Although compound 17, 26 and 44 had
269
common MSn product ions at m/z 139, which may indicate the formation methyl
270
pyrogallol fragments upon CID, the identities of compounds 17 and 44 yet remain
271
unknown. Luteic acid, a molecule present in the structure of myrobalanitannin, has been
272
reported in the fruits of Terminalia chebula Renz. as an intermediate of ellagic acid
273
biosynthesis.44
274
Five compounds, 3, 11, 18, 21, and 22, were tentatively identified as gallic acid
275
derivatives due to the formation of a deprotonated gallic acid at m/z 169 as MSn daughter
276
ion, although their further characterization remains pending. The yet unidentified gallic
277
acid derivative, compound 3, may contain nitrogen due to its even-numbered mass-to-
278
charge ratio at m/z 296 (Table 1).
279 280
Flavonoids
281 282
Flavonols
283
A total of 17 flavonols was tentatively identified in red pistachio hull extracts, including
284
quercetin, myricetin and kaempferol derivatives. Quercetin derivatives, 38, 40-43, 45-47,
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
285
50 and 51, were the major flavonol constituents of the hulls under investigation,
286
according to their highly characteristic UV absorption maxima at ca. 350 nm, common
287
fragment ions at m/z 301 (deprotonated quercetin), and a characteristic fragment of the
288
quercetin aglycone at m/z 179. The major quercetin derivatives, quercetin 3-O-
289
galactoside, 40, quercetin 3-O-glucuronide, 41, and quercetin 3-O-glucoside, 42, were
290
identified by comparing their retention times, UV absorption and MS data to those of
291
authentic standards (Figure 3). In addition to quercetin hexosides, a quercetin pentoside,
292
47, was tentatively identified. Moreover, several types of galloylated quercetin glycosides
293
were tentatively identified according to their analytical data shown in Table 1, such as
294
quercetin galloyl hexosides, 38, 43, and 45, quercetin galloyl deoxyhexose, 46, quercetin
295
galloyl hexuronide, 50, and quercetin galloyl pentoside, 51.
296
Four myricetin derivatives, 30, 33-35, were tentatively assigned based on their
297
characteristic fragment ion at m/z 317 (myricetin aglycone) and their characteristic
298
secondary fragments at m/z 299 and 271. Compound 33 was tentatively identified as
299
myricetin hexuronide due to its parent ion [M-H]- at m/z 493 and the derived, previously
300
reported29 predominant daughter ion at m/z 317, indicating the loss of an uronic acid
301
moiety in agreement with its high resolution MS data. Compounds 34 and 35 were
302
tentatively identified as myricetin hexosides based on the analytical data presented in
303
Table 1. Compound 34 was further identified as myricetin 3-O-galactoside after
304
comparison of its analytical data with that of an authentic standard. The parent ion [M-H]-
305
of compound 30 at m/z 631 was characterized by the sequential loss of 162 Da (hexose)
306
and 152 Da (galloyl moiety), thus being identified as myricetin galloyl hexoside in
307
agreement with its high resolution MS data. Moreover, three kaempferol derivatives,
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 16 of 35
308
namely two hexosides and one pentoside, 49, 52 and 53, were identified in trace amounts.
309
HR-ESI-MS accurate mass measurements were in agreement with all proposed flavonols
310
(Table 1).
311
Flavonols of pistachio hull have been recently investigated using HPLC-DAD.5
312
According to this study, quercetin rutinoside represented the major flavonol accompanied
313
by lower amounts of quercetin, quercetin galactoside, quercetin glucoside, kaempferol
314
and isorhamnetin glycosides. The presence of these flavonol derivatives was confirmed
315
by our study, except for quercetin rutinoside and isorhamnetin derivatives which were not
316
detected in our samples. In further contrast, in our samples, quercetin galactoside,
317
quercetin glucuronide and quercetin glucoside were the major flavonols accompanied by
318
low amounts of myricetin and kaempferol derivatives (Table 1).
319 320
Anthocyanins
321
Compound 26 was the main peak observed in the chromatogram recorded at 520 nm
322
(Figure 3), whose parent ion [M]+ at m/z 449 exhibited a characteristic daughter ion [M-
323
162]+ at m/z 287, the cyanidin aglycone. After comparing its retention time, UV/Vis
324
absorption and mass spectra with those of an authentic standard, compound 25 was
325
tentatively identified as cyanidin 3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside. Minor amounts of a
326
putative cyanidin pentoside, 27, were also tentatively identified based on the formation of
327
a cyanidin aglycone at m/z 287 after the loss of a pentose (132 Da) upon CID
328
fragmentation. The presence of cyanidin 3-O-galactoside in P. vera seed coat (named as
329
“skin” in the study)45,46 and cyanidin 3-O-glucoside in leaves of P. lentiscus34 has
330
previously been reported. However, this is the first report on the occurrence and 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
331
identification of cyanidin derivatives in red pistachio hull, although a previous study
332
reported
333
spectrophotometrically.47 Interestingly, 7-O-methylated anthocyanins have not been
334
observed in our study, although their presence in mango,48 cashew apple,49 Brazilian
335
pepper,18 and sumac27 has been proposed to be a chemotaxonomic marker of the
336
Anacardiaceae. Noteworthy, our samples underwent drying and storage prior to analyses,
337
and thus, further studies on freshly collected pistachio fruits should be done. On the other
338
hand, it is worth mentioning that P. vera has occasionally been classified in its own
339
family Pistaciaceae rather than in the Anacardiaceae, which may be supported by the
340
aforementioned lack of 7-O-methylated anthocyanins.
total
anthocyanin
contents
of
pistachio
hulls
as
determined
341 342
Anacardic acids
343
A total of 11 anacardic acids 54-60, 62-64, 66, with different lengths of alkyl chains
344
(C13, C15 and C17) and saturation degrees (fully saturated or mono-, di-, or
345
triunsaturated) were identified in pistachio hull extracts (Table 1). They eluted late at 88-
346
94 min (Figure 3) due to their lipophilic alk(en)yl side chain. In the following, the
347
compounds are named according to the length of their side chain and the number of
348
double bonds in the side chain (Figure 2). All of them produced similar UV absorption
349
spectra with maximum absorbance at 250 and 311 nm. Their CID mass spectra had a
350
product ion [M-44]- in common, indicating a CO2 loss from the phenolic carboxyl group.
351
Furthermore, characteristic product ions at m/z 106 or m/z 107 have been reported to
352
occur due to the elimination of the phenol group, while product ions at m/z 119 and 149
353
were described to result from fragmentation at the allyl position of unsaturated anacardic 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 18 of 35
354
acids.50,51 Compound 63 was assigned as (15:0)-anacardic acid after comparing its
355
retention time, UV absorption and mass spectra including the characteristic loss of CO2
356
(44 Da), and the product ion at m/z 106 with those of an authentic standard. The
357
identification of further anacardic acids was based on UV and mass spectra including
358
accurate mass measurements and the corresponding molecular formulas that were
359
consistent with previously published data of Jerz et al.50 As shown in Figure 3, the most
360
abundant representatives were (13:0)-, 59, (13:1)-, 58, (15:0)-, 63, (15:1)-, 60, and (17:1)-
361
anacardic acids, 64, being in agreement with an earlier study on phenolic acids of P.
362
vera.13 Their elution occurred later with increasing chain length and decreasing degree of
363
saturation as previously shown.50 Based on the oxidative degradation of these major
364
compounds, Yalpani et al.13 determined the localization of the double bond of the
365
unsaturated (13:1)-, (15:1)-, and (17:1)-anacardic acids to be at the 8 position of the alkyl
366
chain for monounsaturated anacardic acids from green pistachio hull (named as “outer
367
green shell” in their study). We assume that this allocation of the double bonds may also
368
be valid for our results. Besides confirming these major compounds, our study is the first
369
report of the occurrence of six minor anacardic acids, namely (16:1)-, (13:2)-, (11:0)-,
370
(15:3)-, (17:2)-, and (17:0)-anacardic acids. In contrast to pistachio kernels,51 cardanols,
371
decarboxylated derivatives of anacardic acids, were not detected in pistachio hulls.
372
Interestingly, anacardic acids are currently considered to be chemotaxonomic markers of
373
the Anacardiaceae,14 consistently occurring in cashew nuts and shells,50 as well as in
374
mango.52 These findings might be of interest for the above mentioned discussion on the
375
assignment of the genus Pistacia.
376
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 35
377
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Minor compound
378
Compound 5 with a parent ion [M-H]- at m/z 153 was tentatively identified as
379
protocatechuic acid after comparison of its analytical data with those of an authentic
380
standard. Protocatechuic acid has been reported in pistachio hull before.5,6
381 382
Comparison of red and green hulls
383
When red and green type pistachio hulls were compared (Figure 3), virtually identical
384
phenolic profiles were observed, except for the anthocyanins that only occurred in red
385
hulls. These findings indicate that green and red pistachio hulls may be utilized without
386
separation as a source of phenolic compounds. However, further research on the quantity
387
and contribution of each class of phenolic compounds to the biological activity of red and
388
green pistachio hull extracts should be performed to determine technologically optimal
389
recovery strategies for phenolics from different types of pistachio hulls.
390 391
In conclusion, the complex phenolic profiles of dried red and green P. vera hulls were
392
characterized in this study to provide basic knowledge for their future utilization. Apart
393
from anthocyanins that are characteristic of red hulls, phenolic constituents of pistachio
394
hulls may largely be grouped in three major phenolic classes: gallotannins, flavonoids
395
and anacardic acids. The identity of the gallotannins of pistachio hull was elucidated for
396
the first time, revealing the presence of galloyl hexoses with up to nine galloyl units, and
397
galloyl quinic and shikimic acids with up to three galloyl units. Pistachio hulls also
398
contained glycosides of flavonoids such as quercetin glycosides and a cyanidin 3-O-β-D19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 20 of 35
399
galactopyranoside. Furthermore, anacardic acids, a distinct class of polar phenolic lipids,
400
were identified and may be useful as chemotaxonomic markers. In brief, a wide range of
401
phenolic compounds was present in pistachio hulls, ranging from simple (gallic acid) to
402
very complex ones (gallotannins) and from polar/mid-polar (gallotannins and flavonoids)
403
to amphiphilic (anacardic acids) ones. Thus, pistachio hull represents an interesting
404
source for the production of multifunctional phenolic extracts. Further research on the
405
extraction and isolation of these compounds and the determination of their relation with
406
attributed biological functions should be encouraged.
407
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
408
We thank Joachim Trinkner (University of Stuttgart, Germany) for conducting the
409
HPLC-ESI-HR-MS analyses.
410
Funding
411
TUBITAK 2211/C and 2214/A Programs are acknowledged for financial support of one
412
of the authors (S.E.).
413
Notes
414
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
415
ABBREVIATIONS
416
(11:0)-anacardic acid, undecylsalicylic acid; (13:0)-anacardic acid, tridecylsalicylic acid;
417
(13:1)-anacardic
acid,
tridecenylsalicylic
acid;
(13:2)-anacardic
acid, 20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
418
tridecadienylsalicylic acid; (15:0)-anacardic acid, pentadecylsalicylic acid; (15:1)-
419
anacardic
420
pentadecatrienylsalicylic acid; (16:1)-anacardic acid, hexadecenylsalicylic acid; (17:0)-
421
anacardic acid, heptadecylsalicylic acid; (17:1)-anacardic acid, heptadecenylsalicylic
422
acid; (17:2)-anacardic acid, heptadecadienylsalicylic acid.
acid,
pentadecenylsalicylic
acid;
(15:3)-anacardic
acid,
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
423
REFERENCES
424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466
(1) (2)
(3) (4) (5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10) (11) (12)
(13) (14)
(15)
Page 22 of 35
FAO. FAOSTAT database of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (http://faostat.fao.org/) (accessed Feb 28, 2016). Seeram, N. P.; Zhang, Y.; Bowerman, S. Phytochemicals and Health Aspects of Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.). In Tree Nuts: Composition, Phytochemicals, and Health Effects; Alasalvar, C., Shahidi, F., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2008; pp 295–303. Bloch, F.; Brekke, J. E. Processing of pistachio nuts. Econ. Bot. 1960, 14, 129– 144. Payne, T. J. Nuts. In Processing Fruits: Science and Technology; Barrett, D. M., Somogyi, L., Ramaswamy, H., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2004; pp 765–808. Barreca, D.; Laganà, G.; Leuzzi, U.; Smeriglio, A.; Trombetta, D.; Bellocco, E. Evaluation of the nutraceutical, antioxidant and cytoprotective properties of ripe pistachio (Pistacia vera L., variety Bronte) hulls. Food Chem. 2016, 196, 493–502. Garavand, F.; Madadlou, A.; Moini, S. Determination of phenolic profile and antioxidant activity of pistachio hull using HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS as affected by ultrasound and microwave. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, doi:0.1080/10942912.2015.1099045. Goli, A. H.; Barzegar, M.; Sahari, M. A. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic compounds of pistachio (Pistachia vera) hull extracts. Food Chem. 2005, 92, 521– 525. Rajaei, A.; Barzegar, M.; Mobarez, A. M.; Sahari, M. A.; Esfahani, Z. H. Antioxidant, anti-microbial and antimutagenicity activities of pistachio (Pistachia vera) green hull extract. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 107–112. Castillo-Juárez, I.; Rivero-Cruz, F.; Celis, H.; Romero, I. Anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of anacardic acids from Amphipterygium adstringens. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 114, 72–77. Kubo, I.; Muroi, H.; Himejima, M. Structure-antibacterial activity relationships of anacardic acids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1993, 14, 1016–1019. Kubo, I.; Ochi, M.; Vieira, P. C.; Komatsu, S. Antitumor agents from the cashew (Anacardium occidentale) apple juice. J. Agric. Food Chem 1993, 41, 1012–1015. Alam-Escamilla, D.; Estrada-Muñiz, E.; Solís-Villegas, E.; Elizondo, G.; Vega, L. Genotoxic and cytostatic effects of 6-pentadecyl salicylic anacardic acid in transformed cell lines and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2015, 777, 43–53. Yalpani, M.; Tyman, J. H. P. The phenolic acids of Pistachia vera. Phytochemistry 1983, 22, 2263–2266. Schulze-Kaysers, N.; Feuereisen, M. M.; Schieber, A. Phenolic compounds in edible species of the Anacardiaceae family – a review. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 73301– 73314. Berardini, N.; Fezer, R.; Conrad, J.; Beifuss, U.; Carle, R.; Schieber, A. Screening of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars for their contents of flavonol O- and xanthone C-glycosides, anthocyanins, and pectin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1563–1570. 22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 35
467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21) (22) (23) (24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
Engels, C.; Gänzle, M. G.; Schieber, A. Fractionation of gallotannins from mango (Mangifera indica L.) kernels by high-speed counter-current chromatography and determination of their antibacterial activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 775– 780. Geerkens, C. H.; Matejka, A. E.; Carle, R.; Schweiggert, R. M. Development and validation of an HPLC method for the determination of alk(en)ylresorcinols using rapid ultrasound-assisted extraction of mango peels and rye grains. Food Chem. 2015, 169, 261–269. Feuereisen, M. M.; Hoppe, J.; Zimmermann, B. F.; Weber, F.; Schulze-Kaysers, N.; Schieber, A. Characterization of phenolic compounds in Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi) exocarp. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 6219– 6226. Paramashivappa, R.; Kumar, P. P.; Vithayathil, P. J.; Rao, A. S. Novel method for isolation of major phenolic constituents from cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) nut shell liquid. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 2548–2551. AOAC Official Method 934.01. Moisture in Animal Feed. In Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, 2002; Vol. 1. MEB. Antepfıstığı Yetiştiriciliği; T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı: Ankara, Türkiye, 2010. TUIK. Turkey’s Statistical Yearbook 2013; Turkish Statistical Institute: Ankara, Türkiye, 2014. Khanbabaee, K.; van Ree, T. Tannins: Classification and definition. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2001, 18, 641–649. Krenek, K. A.; Barnes, R. C.; Talcott, S. T. Phytochemical composition and effects of commercial enzymes on the hydrolysis of gallic acid glycosides in mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. “Keitt”) pulp. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 9515– 9521. Gross, G. G. Synthesis of mono-, di-and trigalloyl-β-ᴅ-glucose by β-glucogallindependent galloyltransferases from oak leaves. Z. Naturforsch. C 1983, 38, 519– 523. Niemetz, R.; Niehaus, J. U.; Gross, G. G. Biosynthesis and Biodegradation of Complex Gallotannins. In Plant Polyphenols 2: Chemistry, Biology, Pharmacology, Ecology; Gross, G. G., Hemingway, R. W., Yoshida, T., Eds.; Springer US: New York, 2012; pp 63–82. Abu-Reidah, I. M.; Ali-Shtayeh, M. S.; Jamous, R. M.; Arráez-Román, D.; SeguraCarretero, A. HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS screening of bioactive components from Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac) fruits. Food Chem. 2015, 166, 179–191. Meyers, K. J.; Swiecki, T. J.; Mitchell, A. E. Understanding the native Californian diet: Identification of condensed and hydrolyzable tannins in tanoak acorns (Lithocarpus densiflorus). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 7686–7691. Regazzoni, L.; Arlandini, E.; Garzon, D.; Santagati, N. A.; Beretta, G.; Maffei Facino, R. A rapid profiling of gallotannins and flavonoids of the aqueous extract of Rhus coriaria L. by flow injection analysis with high-resolution mass spectrometry assisted with database searching. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2013, 72, 202–207. 23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558
(30)
(31)
(32) (33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38) (39)
(40)
(41) (42)
(43)
Page 24 of 35
Berardini, N.; Carle, R.; Schieber, A. Characterization of gallotannins and benzophenone derivatives from mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. “Tommy Atkins”) peels, pulp and kernels by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 18, 2208– 2216. Geerkens, C. H.; Schweiggert, R. M.; Steingass, H.; Boguhn, J.; Rodehutscord, M.; Carle, R. Influence of apple and citrus pectins, processed mango peels, a phenolic mango peel extract, and gallic acid as potential feed supplements on in vitro total gas production and rumen methanogenesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 5727–5737. Mueller-Harvey, I. Analysis of hydrolysable tannins. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2001, 91, 3–20. Luo, F.; Fu, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Yan, S.; Hu, G.; Huang, X.; Huang, G.; Sun, C.; Li, X.; Chen, K. Identification and quantification of gallotannins in mango (Mangifera indica L.) kernel and peel and their antiproliferative activities. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 8, 282–291. Romani, A.; Pinelli, P.; Galardi, C.; Mulinacci, N.; Tattini, M. Identification and quantification of galloyl derivatives, flavonoid glycosides and anthocyanins in leaves of Pistacia lentiscus L. Phytochem. Anal. 2002, 13, 79–86. Clifford, M. N.; Stoupi, S.; Kuhnert, N. Profiling and characterization by LC-MSn of the galloylquinic acids of green tea, tara tannin, and tannic acid. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 2797–2807. Taamalli, A.; Iswaldi, I.; Arráez-Román, D.; Segura-Carretero, A.; FernándezGutiérrez, A.; Zarrouk, M. UPLC-QTOF/MS for a rapid characterisation of phenolic compounds from leaves of Myrtus communis L. Phytochem. Anal. 2014, 25, 89–96. Bravo, L.; Goya, L.; Lecumberri, E. LC/MS characterization of phenolic constituents of mate (Ilex paraguariensis, St. Hil.) and its antioxidant activity compared to commonly consumed beverages. Food Res. Int. 2007, 40, 393–405. Lee, M.-W.; Tanaka, T.; Nonaka, G.-I.; Nishioka, I. Dimeric ellagitannins from Alnus japonica. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 2835–2839. Ishimaru, K.; Nonaka, G. I.; Nishioka, I. Gallic acid esters of proto-quercitol, quinic acid and (-)-shikimic acid from Quercus mongolica and Q. myrsin aefolia. Phytochemistry 1987, 26, 1501–1504. Nonaka, G.; Nishioka, I.; Nishizawa, M.; Yamagishi, T.; Kashiwada, Y.; Dutschman, G. E.; Bodner, A. J.; Kilkuskie, R. E.; Cheng, Y. C.; Lee, K. H. AntiAIDS agents, 2: Inhibitory effects of tannins on HIV reverse transcriptase and HIV replication in H9 lymphocyte cells. J. Nat. Prod. 1990, 53, 587–595. Harbowy, M. E.; Balentine, D. A.; Davies, A. P.; Cai, Y. Tea chemistry. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1997, 16, 415–480. Behgar, M.; Ghasemi, S.; Naserian, A.; Borzoie, A.; Fatollahi, H. Gamma radiation effects on phenolics, antioxidants activity and in vitro digestion of pistachio (Pistachia vera) hull. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2011, 80, 963–967. Tian, F.; Li, B.; Ji, B.; Zhang, G.; Luo, Y. Identification and structure-activity relationship of gallotannins separated from Galla chinensis. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 1289–1295. 24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 35
559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(44) (45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
Nierenstein, M.; Potter, J. The distribution of myrobalanitannin. Biochem J. 1945, 39, 390–392. Tomaino, A.; Martorana, M.; Arcoraci, T.; Monteleone, D.; Giovinazzo, C.; Saija, A. Antioxidant activity and phenolic profile of pistachio (Pistacia vera L., variety Bronte) seeds and skins. Biochimie 2010, 92, 1115–1122. Bellomo, M. G.; Fallico, B. Anthocyanins, chlorophylls and xanthophylls in pistachio nuts (Pistacia vera) of different geographic origin. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2007, 20, 352–359. Nadernejad, N.; Ahmadimoghadam, A.; Hosseinifard, J.; Pourseyedi, S. Phenylalanin ammonia-lyase activity, total phenolic and flavonoid content in flowers, leaves, hulls and kernels of three pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) cultivars. Am. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2012, 12, 807–814. Berardini, N.; Schieber, A.; Klaiber, I.; Beifuss, U.; Carle, R.; Conrad, J. 7-Omethylcyanidin 3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside, a novel anthocyanin from mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. “Tommy Atkins”) peels. Z. Naturforsch. B 2005, 60, 801–804. Schweiggert, R. M.; Vargas, E.; Conrad, J.; Hempel, J.; Gras, C. C.; Ziegler, J. U.; Mayer, A.; Jimenez, V.; Esquivel, P.; Carle, R. Carotenoids, carotenoid esters, and anthocyanins of yellow- , orange- , and red-peeled cashew apple (Anacardium occidentale L.). Food Chem. 2016, 200, 274–282. Jerz, G.; Murillo-Velásquez, J. A.; Skrjabin, I.; Gök, R.; Winterhalter, P. Anacardic Acid Profiling in Cashew Nuts by Direct Coupling of Preparative HighSpeed Countercurrent Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry (prepHSCCC-ESI/APCI-MS/MS). In Recent Advances in the Analysis of Food and Flavors; Toth, S., Mussinan, C., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2012; Vol. 1098, pp 145–165. Saitta, M.; Giuffrida, D.; La Torre, G. L.; Potortì, A. G.; Dugo, G. Characterisation of alkylphenols in pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) kernels. Food Chem. 2009, 117, 451–455. Knödler, M.; Berardini, N.; Kammerer, D. R.; Carle, R.; Schieber, A. Characterization of major and minor alk(en)ylresorcinols from mango (Mangifera indica L.) peels by high-performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 21, 945–951.
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 26 of 35
FIGURE CAPTIONS Figure 1.
Photograph of dried (A) green and (B) red Pistacia vera L. drupes. Background was cut off without further manipulation. Note that the green color has been lost upon drying and storage due to its instability.
Figure 2.
Representative structures of phenolic compounds detected at high signal intensity in aqueous methanolic extracts of Pistacia vera L. hulls
Figure 3.
HPLC separation of phenolic compounds from (A) red and (B) green Pistacia vera L. hulls at 280 nm. (C) Chromatogram of phenolic compounds from red hull monitored at different wavelengths. Peak assignments are shown in Table 1.
Figure 4.
Extracted ion chromatograms indicating the putative presence of (A) penta- (m/z 939), (B) hexa- (m/z 1091), (C) hepta- (m/z 1243), (D) octa(m/z 1395), and (E) nona- (m/z 1547) galloyl hexoses.
26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 1. HPLC Retention Times, UV/Vis Spectra, and MS Data of Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) Hull Phenolics a
HPLCUV/Vis abs. max (nm) 274
HR-ESI(-)-MS [M-H]m/z exp. (theo.)
molecular formula
HPLC-ESI-MSn experiment m/z
331.0684 (331.0671)
C13H16O10
[331]: 169(100), 271(56), 193(31), 211(31), 183(25), 315(10)
gallic acidb gallic acid derivative (1)
272 276
nac 296.0788 (296.0789)
na na
11.2 13.4 14.5
galloyl quinic acid protocatechuic acidb galloyl dihexose (1)
275 259 274
343.0689 (343,0671) na 493.1195 (493.1194)
C14H16O10 na C19H26O15
7
16.5
galloyl dihexose (2)
274
493.1209 (493.1194)
C19H26O15
8
17.2
galloyl dihexose (3)
274
493.1205 (493.1199)
C19H26O15
9
18.0
galloyl shikimic acid (1)
274
325.0571 (325.0565)
C14H14O9
10
19.6
galloyl shikimic acid (2)
274
325.0568 (325.0565)
C14H14O9
11
20.2
gallic acid derivative (2)
276
na
na
12
20.8
galloyl shikimic acid (3)
274
325.0576 (325.0565)
C14H14O9
13
21.1
digallic acid (1)
280
321.0261 (321.0252)
C14H10O9
14
21.5
digalloyl hexose (1)
280
483.0805 (483.0780)
C20H20O14
15
22.3
methyl gallate
272
na
na
16
23.8
digalloyl hexose (2)
288
483.0794 (483.0780)
C20H20O14
17
25.0
gallic acid derivative (3)
274
509.0972 (509.0996)
C15H26O19
compound no.
tR (min)
compound identity
1
6.0
1-O-galloyl β-Dglucopyranose (βglucogallin)b
2 3
6.8 10.0
4 5 6
[331→169]:125(100) [169]: 125(100) [296]:169(100), 125(15), 195(5), 107(5), 171(2) [296→169]:125(100) [343]: 191(100), 169(17), 125(12) [153]: 109(100) [493]: 313(100), 169(39), 283(29), 331(10) [493→313]: 283(100), 169(44), 223(43), 135(39), 241(15) [493]: 271(100), 313(25), 211(20), 331(20), 169(7) [493→271]: 211(100), 125(4) [493]: 313(100) [493→313]: 169(100), 125(92), 189(30), 242(18) [325]: 169(100), 125(22), 139(9), 193(8) [325→169]: 125(100) [325]: 169(100), 125(15), 281(7), 111(4), 173(3) [325→169]: 124(100), 125(28) [571]: 285(100), 169(7) [571→285]: 133(100), 169(49), 170(10) [325]: 169(100), 125(15), 137(3), 173(3) [325→169]: 125(100) [321]: 169(100) [321→169]: 125(100) [483]: 331(100), 271[(16), 169(15) [483→331]: 169(100), 313(60), 271(51), 193(25), 123(15), 241(12), 195(12), 211(10) [183]: 168(100), 124(10) [183→168]: 124(100) [483]: 331(100), 169(27), 332(17), 271(11) [483→331]: 169(100), 241(53), 125(15) [509]: 267(100), 429(11) [509→267]: 139(100)
27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
18
26.0
gallic acid derivative (4)
274
423.0931 (423.0933)
C19H20O11
19
26.4
digalloyl quinic acid
274
495.0776 (495.0780)
C21H20O14
20
27.3
digallic acid (2)
275
321.0246 (321.0252)
C14H10O9
21
28.1
gallic acid derivative (5)
268
403.1254 (403.1246)
C17H24O11
22
29.5
gallic acid derivative (6)
274
467.1197 (467.1195)
C21H24O12
23
30.6
digalloyl shikimic acid (1)
275
477.0688 (477.0675)
C21H18O13
24
31.0
digalloyl shikimic acid (2)
276
477.0703 (477.0675)
C21H18O13
25
31.6
cyanidin 3-O-β-Dgalactopyranosideb
278, 517
na
na
26
33.2
luteic acid
278
319.0133 (319.0096)
C14H8O9
27 28
33.7 33.8
cyanidin pentoside trigalloyl quinic acid
520 273
na 647.0873 (647.0890)
na C28H24O18
29
34.5
quinic acid derivative (1)
276
523.1455 (523.1157)
C24H28O13
30
35.3
myricetin galloyl hexoside
270, 354
631.0934 (631.0941)
C28H24O17
31
35.8
tetragalloyl hexose
278
787.1010 (787.0999)
C34H28O22
32
36.7
trigallic acid
274
473.0373 (473.0362)
C21H14O13
33
36.9
myricetin hexuronide
357, 252
493.0640 (493.0624)
C21H18O14
34
37.1
myricetin 3-O-galactoside
359, 252
479.0848 (479.0831)
C21H20O13
35
37.4
myricetin hexoside
357, 252
479.0884 (479.0831)
C21H20O13
36
37.9
methyl-digallate
274
335.0414 (335.0409)
C15H12O9
37
38.3
penta-O-galloyl-β-D
280
939.1130 (939.1109)
C41H32O26
Page 28 of 35
[423]: 313(100), 169(70), 125(36), 211(24) [423→313]: 169(100), 313(39), 295(17) [495]: 343(100), 191(29), 344(16), 271(4) 169(3) [495→343]: 191(100) [321]: 169(100), 125(16) [321→169]: 125(100) [403]: 169(100), 151(55), 313(37), 125(36), 271(21), 211(18), 179(15), [403→169]: 124(100), 125(34), 107(34) [467]: 313(100), 169(17), 295(7) [467→313]: 169(100), 153(10), 191(5) [477]: 325(100), 169(47), 326(33) [477→325]: 169(100) [477]: 325(100), 169(47) [477→325]: 169(100), 125(11), 281(10) d [449]: 287(100) [449→287]: 137(100) [319]: 239(100), 139(15), 240(14) [319→239]: 139(100), 124(12) d [419]: 287(100) [647]: 495(100), 343(22), 191(2) [647→495]: 343(100), 191(46) [523]: 209(100), 371(45), 505(30), 313(19), 169(14), 191(14) [523→209]: 191(100), 165(21), 151(18), 123(2) [631]: 479(100), 317(10) [631→479]: 316(100), 317(69), 325(15), 271(11) [787]: 617(100) [787→617]: 465(100), 589(55), 221(41), 277(34), 449(30), 600(26), 296(20), 235(18), 466(12) [473]: 321(100), 169(25) [473→321]: 169(100), 125(6) [493]: 317(100), 299(4), 151(3), 137(2) [493→317]: 227(100), 151(23), 137(18) [479]: 317(100), 271(20), 179(19), 287(15) [479→317]: 215(100), 271(99), 164(24), 270(22), 287(22), 242(17) [479]: 316(100), 317(57), 271(12) [479→316]: 271(100), 179(40), 317(35), 180(29), 255(26), 137(23) [335]: 183(100), 253(5) [335→183]: 168(100) [939]: 769(100), 617(18), 787(12)
28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
glucoseb [939→769]: 617(100), 387(43), 601(40), 465(28), 323(21), 259(19), 403(19), 725(17), 245(12), 573(12), 386(11) [615]: 463(100), 301(32)
38
38.9
quercetin galloyl hexoside (1)
257, 354
615.1031 (615.0992)
C28H24O16
39
40.6
hexagalloyl hexose
263, 353
1091.1423 (1091.1213)
C48H36O30
40
41.0
quercetin 3-O-galactosideb
252, 352
463.0922 (463.0882)
C21H20O12
41
41.2
quercetin 3-Oglucuronideb
255, 355
477.0715 (477.0675)
C21H18O13
42
41.6
quercetin 3-O-glucosideb
260, 355
463.0915 (463.0877)
C21H20O12
43
42.1
quercetin galloyl hexoside (2)
254, 358
615.1031 (615.0986)
C28H24O16
44
42.7
gallic acid derivative (7)
279
347.0409 (347.0406)
C16H12O9
45
42.9
quercetin galloyl hexoside (3)
276, 358
615.1098 (615.0986)
C28H24O16
[615→301]: 179(100), 151(99) [347]: 267(100), 139(5), 249(4), 269(4), 124(2) [347→267]: 139(100), 249(28), 83(16), 140(10), 205(8) [615]: 301(100), 179(5), 463(3)
46
43.3
quercetin galloyl deoxyhexose
274, 355
599.1075 (599.1037)
C28H24O15
[615→301]: 151(100), 170(32), 107(21), 179(20), [599]: 463(100), 301(36)
47
43.7
quercetin pentoside
254, 355
433.0810 (433.0771)
C20H18O11
48
44.1
unknown (1)
275, 357
na
na
49
45.0
kaempferol hexoside
272, 350
447.0963 (447.0927)
C21H20O11
50
45.4
quercetin galloyl hexuronide
276, 352
629.0852 (629.0779)
C28H22O17
[599→463]: 301(100), 255(7) [433]: 301(100), 255(6), 242(4), 193(4) [433→301]: 271(100), 179(42), 151(41), 255(11), 243(9), [629]: 327(100), 459(15), 477(15), 328(11) [629→327]: 113(100), 169(49), 283(40), 175(38), 170(37), 177(35) [447]: 285(100), 255(28), 327(19) [447→285]: 255(100), 223(6), 256(5) [629]: 477(100), 301(26)
51
46.3
quercetin galloyl pentoside
277, 352
585.0910 (585.0881)
C27H22O15
[629→477]: 301(100), 323(5), 175(3) [585]: 301(100)
[615→463]: 301(100), 179(8), 229(7), 253(6), 272(6), 151(2) [1091]: 939(100), 769(16) [1091→939]: 769(100), 770(13), 617(10) [463]: 301(100), 179(8) [463→301]: 151(100), 229(58), 271(43), 343(30), 254(26), 258(24), 181(16) [477]: 301(100), 179(7), 151(2) [477→301]: 179(100), 152(20), 180(11), 121(8), 256(7), 273(6), 229(6) [463]: 301(100) [463→301]: 179(100), 271(52), 152(39), 272(32), 255(31), 151(27), 203(21) [615]: 301(100), 313(15), 315(8), 273(6), 463(3)
[585→301]: 151(100), 179(45), 165(44), 121(9)
29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
52
46.9
kaempferol hexoside
270, 350
447.0952 (447.0927)
C21H20O11
53
48.9
kaempferol pentoside
270, 350
417.0907 (417.0822)
C20H18O10
54
88.4
(16:1)-anacardic acid
238, 310
359.2521 (359.2586)
C23H36O3
55
88.5
(13:2)-anacardic acid
238, 310
315.1968 (315.1966)
C20H28O3
56
88.9
(11:0)-anacardic acid
238, 308
291.1960 (291.1966)
C18H28O3
57
89.1
(15:3)-anacardic acid
238, 310
341.2112 (341.2122)
C22H30O3
58
89.6
(13:1)-anacardic acid
246, 310
317.2115 (317.2117)
C20H30O3
59
90.7
(13:0)-anacardic acid
248, 312
319.2289 (319.2279)
C20H32O3
60
91.0
(15:1)-anacardic acid
240, 310
345.2429 (345.2434)
C22H34O3
61
91.2
unknown (2)
260
455.3510 (455.3405)
C30H48O3
62
91.4
(17:2)-anacardic acid
238, 310
371.2599 (371.2592)
C24H36O3
63
92.0
(15:0)-anacardic acidb
242, 311
347.2623 (347.2592)
C22H36O3
64
92.2
(17:1)-anacardic acid
248, 312
373.2743 (373.2743)
C24H38O3
65
92.4
unknown (3)
260
373.2748 (373.2748)
C24H38O3
66
93.1
(17:0)-anacardic acid
238, 312
375.2951 (375.2977)
C24H40O3
Page 30 of 35
[447]: 285(100), 284(92), 255(63), 163(18), 151(17) [447→285]: 255(100), 197(13), 240(10), 198(8), 213(7), 227(6), 169(5) [417]: 284(100), 255(37) [417→284]: 255(100), 160(5), 165(4), 227(4), 195(3), 151(3) [359]: 315(100), 341(43), 161(21), 315(17), 107(13), 343(13), 317(11) [359→315]: 108(100) [315]: 271(100), 107(6) [315→271]: 107(100) [291]: 247(100) [291→247]: 106(100) [341]: 297(100) [341→297]:149(100) [317]: 273(100) [317→273]: 107(100) [319]: 275(100) [319→275]: 106(100) [345]: 301(100), 119(4) [345→301]: 119(100) [455]: 418(100) [455→418]: 434(100), 395(66), 375(60), 399(15) [371]: 327(100) [371→327]: 327(100), 119(18), 107(10) [347]: 303(100) [373→303]: 106(100) [373]: 329(100) [373→329]: 106(100) [373]: 329(100) [373→329]: 119(100) [375]: 331(100) [375→331]: 106(100)
a
tR: retention time. Verified by reference standards. c na: not available. d Positive ionization mode was used for the identification of anthocyanins. e All compounds were detected in both red and green pistachio hulls, except for the anthocyanins, 25 and 27, which were only found in red hulls. b
30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 31 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 1 79x74mm (600 x 600 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2 117x80mm (600 x 600 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 32 of 35
Page 33 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3 156x136mm (600 x 600 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4 120x86mm (600 x 600 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 34 of 35
Page 35 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TOC Graphical Abstract 44x23mm (600 x 600 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment