Plant Resistance to Insects - American Chemical Society

2

Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on June 15, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 20, 1983 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1983-0208.ch002

Physiological Constraints on Plant Chemical Defenses H . A . M O O N E Y , S. L. G U L M O N , and N. D . J O H N S O N Stanford University, Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford, C A 94305

Plants allocate their carbon and nitrogen resources to a variety of functions including constructing and maintaining new tissues (root, shoot, reproductive), storage, and defense from herbivores. There i s a genetically-determined time schedule of allocation of resources to various functions which can be modified to a certain degree by environmental conditions. The proposition i s examined that this time schedule represents changing allocation p r i o r i t i e s within the plant which results i n time "windows" when i t is more susceptible to herbivore damage than others. Anti-herbivore "strategies" of plants must be considered i n r e l a t i o n to changing patterns of resource a v a i l a b i l i t y to the whole plant and i n r e l a t i o n to allocation of these resources to enhance reproductive output. P l a n t - i n s e c t i n t e r a c t i o n has been considered e x t e n s i v e l y from the view p o i n t of the chemistry involved i n p l a n t defense ( f o r example reviews i n I), the growth c y c l e of the plant as i t a f f e c t s i t s "apparency" t o herbivores (2_), and the seasonal p h y s i c a l and b i o t i c environment of the herbivores ( 3 ) . Here we consider the i n t e r a c t i o n of the p l a n t ' s p h y s i c a l environment, that i s , i t s changing resource a v a i l a b i l i t y p a t t e r n , w i t h the u t i l i z a t i o n of these resources f o r growth, reproduction and defense against herbivores.The production of p l a n t defensive chemicals i s , o p t i m a l l y , governed by the cost of the chemicals, t h e i r e f f e c t i v e n e s s a t d e t e r r i n g h e r b i v o r y , the r i s k o f h e r b i v o r y , and the cost of herbivory. The e f f e c t i v e n e s s of d i f f e r e n t chemicals a t d e t e r r i n g h e r b i v o r y has been e x t e n s i v e l y s t u d i e d , and t h e o r i e s concerning the r i s k of herbivory are w e l l e s t a b l i s h e d . Much l e s s I s known about the costs of h e r b i v o r y or the costs of defensive chemicals. The costs of defensive 0097-6156/83/0208-0021$06.00/0 © 1983 American Chemical Society

Hedin; Plant Resistance to Insects ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1983.

PLANT RESISTANCE TO INSECTS


22

chemicals are a f u n c t i o n of t h e i r b i o s y n t h e t i c maintenance and turnover c o s t s , but a l s o a f u n c t i o n of the value of the elements used i n t h e i r c o n s t r u c t i o n . The value of these resources w i l l be determined by t h e i r importance to other a c t i v i t i e s such as reproduction, photosynthesis, n u t r i e n t uptake, or support. Here we assess the consequences, i n terms of herbivore s u s c e p t i b i l i t y , of simultaneous uses of l i m i t i n g resources by p l a n t s f o r a v a r i e t y of necessary f u n c t i o n s . We e a r l i e r discussed c o s t s of defensive compounds i n r e l a t i o n to h e r b i v o r y (_4). Carbon and n i t r o g e n are the two primary resources which can be a l l o c a t e d to defensive s t r u c t u r e s and which may a l s o be l i m i t i n g i n a p l a n t . They are used d i r e c t l y i n the c o n s t r u c t i o n of secondary compounds or p r o t e c t i v e s t r u c t u r e s , and carbon i s a l s o used as an energy source to c o n s t r u c t these components. The supply of f i x e d carbon i s an i n t e g r a t i o n of the a v a i l a b i l i t y of a l l the resources l i m i t i n g photosynthesis i n c l u d i n g l i g h t , water, and n u t r i e n t s . Temperature a c t s i n d i r e c t l y to c o n t r o l resource a v a i l a b i l i t y . V a r i a t i o n i n any of these r e s u l t s i n f l u c t u a t i o n s i n carbon g a i n and r e c u r r e n t c y c l e s of storage and u t i l i z a t i o n of carbon i n d i f f e r e n t p a r t s of the plant ( F i g . 1). L i m i t a t i o n s on the supply of n i t r o g e n and carbon could r e s u l t i n " p r i o r i t i e s " of use w i t h i n the p l a n t i n order to maximize f i t n e s s . In the f i r s t part of t h i s paper we consider general aspects of both n i t r o g e n and carbon a l l o c a t i o n . Then we examine the way carbon a l l o c a t i o n p r i o r i t i e s a f f e c t defense from herbivores i n a p a r t i c u l a r v e g e t a t i o n type, the temperate deciduous f o r e s t . Nitrogen N i t r o g e n i s a component of s e v e r a l c l a s s e s of compounds b e l i e v e d to be important i n p l a n t chemical defense, p r i n c i p a l l y cyanogenic g l y c o s i d e s , g l u c o s i n o l a t e s , a l k a l o i d s , c e r t a i n p r o t e i n s , and non-protein amino a c i d s and peptides. The n i t r o g e n c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n leaves i s o f t e n l i m i t i n g to i n s e c t l a r v a l growth (see review by Mattson, _5), and i t i s a primary l i m i t i n g f a c t o r to l e a f carbon-gaining c a p a c i t y (6^ 7_ 8). A l l o c a t i o n of n i t r o g e n to chemical defense must be considered w i t h i n the context of t h i s complex interdependency. The q u a n t i t a t i v e commitment of n i t r o g e n to secondary compounds v a r i e s c o n s i d e r a b l y . At one extreme, the n i c o t i n e c o n c e n t r a t i o n of tobacco leaves ( N l c o t l a n a tabacum) can range from 0.17 to 4.93% ( 9 ) . At the upper l e v e l , t h i s i s equivalent to n e a r l y 1% l e a f n i t r o g e n c o n c e n t r a t i o n , s i n c e n i c o t i n e i s over 17% n i t r o g e n by weight. The t o t a l n i t r o g e n c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n leaves r a r e l y exceeds 5%, so n i c o t i n e may comprise up to 20% of the n i t r o g e n In the l e a f . Not s u p r i s i n g l y , n i c o t i n e production i s c o r r e l a t e d w i t h f e r t i l i z e r a p p l i c a t i o n ( 9 ) . In another example, the cyanogenic g l u c o s i d e content i n the 9



2.

MOONEY E T AL.

Plant Chemical

23

Defenses

Resource availability Uptake Allocation

Stores Retrieval

Growth

Protection

Leaf Support Root Reproduction

I

t Loss Figure 1.

Flow scheme for a resource within a plant.


24



leaves of the evergreen c h a p a r r a l shrub Heteromeles a r b u t i f o l i a a t t a i n s 7% of t o t a l dry weight (10). Assuming, as the authors d i d , that a l l of the g l u c o s i d e was prunasin, t h i s i s equivalent to 0.33% n i t r o g e n by dry weight, or about o n e - t h i r d of the average t o t a l n i t r o g e n i n the l e a f ( 1 1 ) . On the other hand, most a l k a l o i d s c o n t a i n much l e s s n i t r o g e n as a f r a c t i o n of the t o t a l weight than n i c o t i n e (Table I ) , and t o x i c compounds such as a l k a l o i d s are u s u a l l y found a t very low concentrations i n the p l a n t (12). Thus, the a l l o c a t i o n of n i t r o g e n t o nitrogenous secondary compounds can range from s u b s t a n t i a l t o n e g l i g i b l e , even w i t h comparable a l l o c a t i o n s of carbon. Another f a c t o r which i s important i n c o n s i d e r i n g the commitment of n i t r o g e n to chemical defense i s the high m o b i l i t y of t h i s element w i t h i n the p l a n t . In f o r e s t v e g e t a t i o n , 20-40% of the n i t r o g e n i n senescing leaves I s resorbed (13). Nitrogen i s r e a d i l y moved from senescing leaves to developing f r u i t s (14), and i n deciduous trees a s u b s t a n t i a l part of s p r i n g growth i s made u s i n g n i t r o g e n stored i n the r o o t s and stem wood and bark (15, 16). The n i t r o g e n i n secondary compounds a l s o appears to be r e a d i l y mobile and metabolizable. When doubly-labeled n i c o t i n e ( C N) was f e d to tobacco (]¥. r u s t i c a ) , carbon was recovered i n a l k a l o i d s , f r e e amino a c i d s , pigments, f r e e organic acids and f r e e sugars; and n i t r o g e n was recovered i n p r o t e i n s , a l k a l o i d s , f r e e amino a c i d s and pigments ( 1 7 ) . C e r t a i n n i t r o g e n - c o n t a i n i n g t o x i c compounds found i n seeds are completely degraded during germination (18). Other examples o f a l k a l o i d turnover are given i n Robinson (19) and Digenis ( 2 0 ) . Examples of t r a n s l o c a t i o n of n i t r o g e n - c o n t a i n i n g secondary compounds i n c l u d e the cyanogenic g l u c o s i d e , l i n a m a r i n , i n the w i l d lima bean (Phaseolus l u n a t u s ) , which i s t r a n s l o c a t e d from seeds to developing seedlings (21). R i c i n i n e i n c a s t o r beans i s t r a n s l o c a t e d from senescent leaves t o young, developing t i s s u e and t o seeds. Caffeine i s a l s o t r a n s l o c a t e d among leaves and i n t o f r u i t s (22). I n the case of Heteromeles a r b u t i f o l i a , c i t e d e a r l i e r , cyanogenic glucosides appear t o move from leaves i n t o developing seeds'. McKey (23) gives other examples of t r a n s l o c a t i o n of t o x i c compounds w i t h i n the p l a n t . Thus n i t r o g e n i n v e s t e d i n chemical defenses can be moved throughout the p l a n t to p r o t e c t v u l n e r a b l e organs such as young leaves or f r u i t s , and can l a t e r be reused f o r growth and development. Because nitrogenous compounds are r e a d i l y metabolized or transported w i t h i n the p l a n t , i t would seem that the major c o n s t r a i n t on use of n i t r o g e n i n chemical defense i s i t s e f f e c t i v e n e s s and the p a t t e r n of i t s a v a i l a b i l i t y i n the h a b i t a t . I f n i t r o g e n i s the major f a c t o r l i m i t i n g to growth, i t i s u n l i k e l y that l a r g e amounts w i l l be d i v e r t e d to secondary


2.

MOONEY E T AL.

Plant Chemical

25

Defenses


Table 1. Approximate percentages of n i t r o g e n i n some common plant a l k a l o i d s

Alkaloids caffeine nicotine ricinine gramine lupinine quinine mescaline colchicine tomatine

28.9 17.3 17.0 16.1 8.3 7.4 6.6 3.5 1 4

Toxic amino a c i d s 3amlno p r o p i o n i t r i l e canavanine mimosine Transport

40.0 31.8 14.1

amides asparagine glutamine

21.2 19.2

glycine alanine serine proline tyrosine

18.7 15.7 13.3 12.2 7.7

Amino a c i d s

Cyanogenic g l u c o s i d e s linamarin prunasin amygdalin

5.7 4.7 3.1



26


compounds, e s p e c i a l l y s i n c e there are many non-nitrogenous plant products, such as c a r d i a c g l y c o s i d e s , saponins, f l a v o n o i d s , quinones, e t c , which are a l s o t o x i c . Although n i t r o g e n i s probably l i m i t i n g to some extent i n most n a t u r a l systems, i t i s not the major l i m i t i n g n u t r i e n t i n a l l of them, and i s not l i m i t i n g to the same extent a t a l l times of the year. In l a r g e areas of A u s t r a l i a f o r example, phosphorus i s the p r i n c i p l e l i m i t i n g element (24). Some p l a n t s experience a s h o r t - l i v e d abundance of n i t r o g e n . Most annuals occupy d i s t u r b e d or semi-disturbed h a b i t a t s which are c h a r a c t e r i z e d by a sudden r e l e a s e of n u t r i e n t s (25). Even many herbaceous p e r e n n i a l s occur under semi-disturbed c o n d i t i o n s (eg. o l d f i e l d s ) , or grow during a short i n t e r v a l between c l i m a t i c l i m i t a t i o n s and b i o t i c competition when resources are r e l a t i v e l y abundant, as i s the case of the f o r e s t understory f l o r a (26, 2 7 ) . P l a n t t o x i n s are widely d i s t r i b u t e d i n herbaceous s p e c i e s , as opposed to protein-complexing polyphenols which are more l i m i t e d to leaves of woody p e r e n n i a l s (12, 23). This p a t t e r n has been suggested t o r e l a t e to the low p r e d i c t a b i l i t y i n space and time of herbaceous f o l i a g e i n c o n t r a s t to the f o l i a g e of woody p l a n t s (2_, 12). However, i t should be noted t h a t , a t l e a s t i n the case of some annuals (9_, 28), a l l of the n i t r o g e n i s taken up during the p e r i o d of v e g e t a t i v e growth and simply r e d i s t r i b u t e d d u r i n g r e p r o d u c t i o n (Figure 2 ) . Although data are scarce, t h i s p a t t e r n may be widespread among herbaceous species s i n c e , as already s t a t e d , they o f t e n grow during a short p e r i o d of resource a v a i l a b i l i t y . Given a p a t t e r n of i n i t i a l r a p i d n u t r i e n t uptake and temporal storage i n some cases to high c o n c e n t r a t i o n s , i t i s c l e a r l y advantageous to maintain any n i t r o g e n not being used f o r photosynthesis or growth i n a form that i s t o x i c t o h e r b i v o r e s . Thus, the common occurrence of t o x i c nitrogenous compounds i n herbaceous p l a n t s may simply r e f l e c t resource a v a i l a b i l i t y p a t t e r n s and consequent a l l o c a t i o n pathways. This p a t t e r n may a l s o apply to some woody p e r e n n i a l s . For example, c h a p a r r a l shrubs have periods of a c t i v e n i t r o g e n uptake i n the f a l l when growth i s not o c c u r r i n g (29). This s t o r e d n i t r o g e n i s moved to new growth i n the s p r i n g and a p o r t i o n i s a l l o c a t e d to nitrogenous defensive compounds (10). Carbon L i k e n i t r o g e n a c q u i s i t i o n , the carbon-gaining c a p a c i t y of a plant i s environmentally l i m i t e d . As described e a r l i e r , t h i s l i m i t a t i o n r e s u l t s i n apparent " p r i o r i t i e s " f o r a l l o c a t i o n t o storage, growth of d i f f e r e n t organs, and e l a b o r a t i o n of v a r i o u s c l a s s e s of m e t a b o l i t e s . These a l l o c a t i o n patterns change during the seasonal growth of an i n d i v i d u a l . I n t r e e s , f o r example, root growth g e n e r a l l y takes place a t times d i f f e r e n t



2.

MOONEY ET AL.

Plant Chemical

Defenses

27

from stem e l o n g a t i o n which i n t u r n i s d i s p l a c e d from stem diameter growth (30, 31) (Figure 3 ) . Carbon metabolism d i f f e r s fundamentally from n i t r o g e n metabolism i n that v i r t u a l l y a l l nitrogenous compounds can be r e c y c l e d w i t h i n the p l a n t , whereas most of the s t r u c t u r a l components of the p l a n t , p r i n c i p a l l y c e l l u l o s e and l i g n i n , a r e not reusable. There are a l s o p u t a t i v e defensive compounds i n t h i s category such as l e a f - e x t e r n a l r e s i n s (32) and p o s s i b l y some condensed t a n n i n s . Thus the c o n s t r a i n t s on a l l o c a t i o n have both an immediate and f u t u r e time frame. The i n t e r a c t i o n s between a v a i l a b i l i t y of resources, carbon g a i n i n g c a p a c i t y , and the a l l o c a t i o n of carbon t o p l a n t f u n c t i o n s , i n c l u d i n g chemical defense, w i l l o b v i o u s l y d i f f e r among environments. We examine a p a r t i c u l a r system, t h e temperate deciduous f o r e s t , t o i l l u s t r a t e the nature of the c o n s t r a i n t s on chemical defenses imposed by l i m i t a t i o n s on carbon gain. The Deciduous Forest In s p r i n g , 80% of the deciduous f o r e s t canopy i s produced over a short span of time (31, 33, 34) (Figure 3). I n i t i a l l e a f expansion, f l o w e r i n g and shoot e x t e n s i o n are h e a v i l y s u b s i d i z e d from carbohydrate reserves because there i s i n s u f f i c i e n t p h o t o s y n t h e t i c area t o support these processes (35, 36) ( F i g . 4 ) . Despite the demand on carbohydrate s t o r e s , reserves are not completely depleted and appear t o be renewed r a p i d l y f o l l o w i n g the growth f l u s h e s (16). I t has been suggested that maintenance of some storage i s important i n the event the f i r s t l e a f crop i s destroyed due t o i n t e n s e h e r b i v o r y (37) o r a l a t e k i l l i n g f r o s t (31), and a second crop must be produced. Deciduous t r e e s vary i n the d u r a t i o n of l e a f i n i t i a t i o n and expansion and new shoot e x t e n s i o n (38-41). This v a r i a t i o n i s t y p i f i e d by two type examples ( F i g u r e 5): Quercus s p e c i e s complete a l l l e a f and shoot growth during a s h o r t p e r i o d , u s u a l l y l a t e A p r i l t o e a r l y June; B e t u l a , by c o n t r a s t , grows throughout most o f the summer. Fagus, Carya, and Fraxinus have growth c y c l e s of the Quercus type, and L l r l o d e n d r o n , Populus, and Llquldamber have extended growth c y c l e s l i k e B e t u l a . Acer species are i n t e r m e d i a t e . The r e l a t i o n s h i p between d u r a t i o n of stem e l o n g a t i o n and dependence on carbohydrate reserves needs to be e s t a b l i s h e d f o r these t r e e s , o b v i o u s l y though oak species which form canopies e n t i r e l y from pre-formed l e a f buds have a heavy d r a i n on carbon reserves f o r a p e r i o d . The young leaves c o n s t i t u t e an abundant food resource f o r phytophagous i n s e c t s and they are e s p e c i a l l y v u l n e r a b l e t o h e r b i v o r e s due to a h i g h n i t r o g e n content and l a c k o f s c l e r o p h y l l y . These c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s appear t o be u n i v e r s a l i n new leaves of deciduous f o r e s t s p e c i e s , and t h i s p e r i o d o f



28


5 5 -7 CD !c £

- A

cm

& E ~o 6 0 1 o"

A

* E

/

1

/

1

1

30

19

.

1

.

1

.

1

.

1

o o

a> >

0 CD

or 19

10

March

April

r 9

May

29

18

June

July

Figure 3. Seasonal growth activity of a white oak in Missouri. Development of canopy photosynthetic capacity is shown in A. Relative seasonal growth activity of various tree components are given in B. Key: F, flower; S, shoot; L, leaf; SC, stem circumference; RG, root growth; and A, acorn. (Reproduced with permission from Ref.31.)



2.

MOONEY ET AL.

Plant Chemical

29

Defenses

4 2 -

0

I—i

A

i

i

i

S

O

N

i

D

i

J

i

F

i

M

i

A

i

M

i

J

1— J

Months Figure 4. Seasonal changes in available carbohydrates in a Californian evergreen oak (A), a Vermont sugar maple (B), and a Calif ornian buckeye (C). Maple data for sapwood are from Ref. 15. Oak and buckeye data are from Ref. 49, for total branch minus fruits. The evergreen oak has a stable supply of carbon through continuous photosynthesis. The maple draws upon reserves in the spring to build a new canopy. The buckeye draws upon reserves to build fruits in the fall as well as new canopy in late January.



30


20 30 10 April May Figure 5.

Seasonal height growth of three deciduous species (39). Key: O, white ash; - • red maple; and gray birch.



2.

MOONEY ET A L .

Plant Chemical

31

Defenses

v u l n e r a b i l i t y t y p i c a l l y l a s t s about one month (42, 43, 44) (Figure 6 ) . Apparently, the p o t e n t i a l f o r reducing t h i s window of v u l n e r a b i l i t y i s f a i r l y l i m i t e d . The p r o t e i n content o f developing leaves could conceivably be reduced but t h i s would slow the metabolic processes o f growth and reduce the gross photosynthetic rate- Both would r e s u l t i n longer development times, prolonging v u l n e r a b i l i t y , and be a heavier d r a i n on r e s e r v e s , consequences which would reduce a t r e e ' s competitive advantage. A somewhat s i m i l a r c o n s t r a i n t a p p l i e s t o the e a r l y development of s c l e r o p h y l l y , a p o t e n t i a l h e r b i v o r e d e t e r r i n g f e a t u r e . C o n s t r u c t i o n of r i g i d c e l l w a l l s and the production of l i g n i n and other compounds would c e r t a i n l y slow the o v e r a l l r a t e of l e a f expansion and prolong the p e r i o d during which the l e a f i s a net importer of carbon r e s e r v e s . We have already mentioned that r a p i d canopy development i s an important competitive advantage and minimizes the time d u r i n g which young leaves are v u l n e r a b l e to h e r b i v o r e s . Climate can sometimes be an a d d i t i o n a l c o n s t r a i n t . For example, i n the white oak f o r e s t i n M i s s o u r i , l e a f development occurs during an i n t e r v a l o f optimal growing c o n d i t i o n s between the l a t e s t k i l l i n g f r o s t and the midsummer drought (31). Deployment o f defensive chemicals during l e a f

expansion.

Toxins appear t o be e f f e c t i v e i n s m a l l q u a n t i t i e s (12), making them an i d e a l low cost defense against g e n e r a l i s t herbivores even though s p e c i a l i s t s are able t o evolve e f f e c t i v e d e t o x i f i c a t i o n mechanisms. Studies have shown t h a t t o x i n c o n c e n t r a t i o n s are g e n e r a l l y higher i n new growth (23, 45), but there have been few s t u d i e s o f temperate deciduous t r e e s . I t has been shown that g e n e r a l i s t herbivores are more common on mature f o l i a g e whereas s p e c i a l i s t h e r b i v o r e s p r e f e r new f o l i a g e (46), but again, there are few s t u d i e s i n the temperate deciduous f o r e s t . Protein-complexing polyphenols are broadly e f f e c t i v e against h e r b i v o r e s , e s p e c i a l l y those not s p e c i f i c a l l y adapted to eat p l a n t s c o n t a i n i n g polyphenols (47). They may c o n s t i t u t e 10% o r more o f the l e a f dry weight (12, 37, 44), and t h i s r e q u i r e s a l l o c a t i o n of s i g n i f i c a n t amounts of carbon and energy to t h e i r c o n s t r u c t i o n . The use of l i m i t e d reserves f o r such q u a n t i t a t i v e defenses must be balanced a g a i n s t the requirements of r a p i d canopy development and new shoot e x t e n s i o n . P a t t e r n s of polyphenol accumulation i n leaves vary among the few temperate f o r e s t species which have been s t u d i e d . Feeny s (42) c l a s s i c study on oak leaves (Quercus robur) shows l e a f t a n n i n l e v e l s r i s i n g s l o w l y u n t i l August, and then i n c r e a s i n g s h a r p l y . In the cases of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and y e l l o w b i r c h ( B e t u l a l u t e a ) (44), r e s p e c t i v e l y , 1



Figure 6. Seasonal changes in leaf nitrogen (A) and leaf toughness (B) of a series of deciduous tree species. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. 43.)



2.

MOONEY ET AL.

Plant Chemical

Defenses

33

polyphenol concentrations peak i n l a t e June and mid May. In Betula pubescens (48) the c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f tannins i s s t a b l e u n t i l l a t e summer and then Increases. Feeny (2) has coined the term "apparency" t o express t h e i d e a that some p l a n t s o r p l a n t components are more p r e d i c t a b l e resources i n space and time t o p o t e n t i a l h e r b i v o r e s . He suggests that such p r e d i c t a b l e p l a n t s are more a t t r a c t i v e t o s p e c i a l i s t herbivores ( i n e v o l u t i o n a r y time) because o f t h e i r p r e d i c t a b i l i t y , and thus should employ q u a n t i t a t i v e defensive compounds which are l e s s s u s c e p t i b l e t o the e v o l u t i o n o f d e t o x i f i c a t i o n mechanisms. We propose that the p a t t e r n s of polyphenol production i n leaves are r e l a t e d t o the d u r a t i o n of new l e a f p r o d u c t i o n . Species which accomplish l e a f expansion and shoot extension w i t h i n a short time p e r i o d , e s p e c i a l l y i n c o l d c l i m a t e s , should g e n e r a l l y have low polyphenol concentrations i n young leaves compared t o species w i t h extended periods of a c t i v e growth. There are two reasons f o r the above. F i r s t , the new leaves of species w i t h short growth periods a r e l e s s "apparent" i n the sense Feeny (2) has described. They appear e a r l y , when predator populations may be i n h i b i t e d by c o l d temperatures, and are not present long enough t o a l l o w build-up of predator p o p u l a t i o n s . By c o n t r a s t , new leaves o f species w i t h long growth periods are present over an extended p e r i o d of time, g e n e r a l l y much o f the summer, and thus c o n s t i t u t e a p r e d i c t a b l e resource f o r s p e c i a l i z e d h e r b i v o r e s . Second, new l e a f and shoot growth are a g r e a t e r d r a i n on p l a n t reserves when the e n t i r e canopy i s produced over a short time p e r i o d (35). In such s p e c i e s , a l l o c a t i o n of 10-25% o f new l e a f dry weight t o polyphenol p r o d u c t i o n would f u r t h e r deplete reserves, slow canopy development, o r both. This would decrease the advantage that such species have i n terms of escaping h e r b i v o r y i n time, and would a l s o reduce the p e r i o d o f carbon g a i n which determines reserves and p o t e n t i a l growth f o r the f o l l o w i n g season. The p a t t e r n s o f polyphenol accumulation i n Quercus (42) and Acer and B e t u l a (44) are c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h i s hypothesis, but examination of polyphenol concentrations through time i n many more species i s necessary. Schultz et a l . (44) suggest t h a t the low polyphenol contents of young leaves may be due t o the f a c t that p r o t e i n s y n t h e s i s suppresses phenolic synthesis. To summarize, s p e c i f i c t o x i n s are e f f e c t i v e d e t e r r e n t s t o g e n e r a l i s t h e r b i v o r e s , but polyphenols produced i n r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e q u a n t i t i e s are the only e f f e c t i v e d e t e r r e n t t o s p e c i a l i s t s . Since l e a f toughness and lower n i t r o g e n content a l s o deter many h e r b i v o r e s , deciduous f o r e s t t r e e s are e s p e c i a l l y v u l n e r a b l e t o a t t a c k during the p e r i o d o f canopy development, which occurs y e a r l y a t a p r e d i c t a b l e time. Canopy development i s h e a v i l y dependent on a v a i l a b l e reserves o f carbohydrate and n i t r o g e n , and the production o f q u a n t i t a t i v e


34



defensive compounds i s expensive i n terms of carbon and energy. I t t h e r e f o r e appears that the patterns of production of polyphenols during canopy development are r e l a t e d to the d u r a t i o n of new growth. Species which produce the e n t i r e canopy during the s h o r t e s t p e r i o d of time, thus i n c u r r i n g the greatest d r a i n on r e s e r v e s , may defer maximum polyphenol production u n t i l a f t e r the canopy i s mature. More i n f o r m a t i o n i s needed to examine these ideas. Summary In order to g a i n an understanding of the options which p l a n t s can u t i l i z e to defend themselves against herbivores we need a more comprehensive view of the carbon and n i t r o g e n a c q u i s i t i o n and a l l o c a t i o n p a t t e r n of p l a n t s of d i v e r s e h a b i t a t s . For example, there are c l e a r d i f f e r e n c e s i n the a l l o c a t i o n p a t t e r n s between annual versus p e r e n n i a l p l a n t s which r e l a t e to the resources a v a i l a b l e to them through time. Further, there are d i f f e r e n c e s i n the r e u t i l i z a t i o n p o s s i b i l i t i e s of e i t h e r carbon or n i t r o g e n compounds w i t h i n a plant as i t develops. These d i v e r s e a c q u i s i t i o n and a l l o c a t i o n p a t t e r n s place c o n s t r a i n t s on the p o s s i b l e defensive s t r a t e g i e s of p l a n t s and hence on the o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r h e r b i v o r e a t t a c k . Acknowledgements. This paper grew out of work supported by NSF grant DEB810279. We thank B. L i l l e y f o r a s s i s t a n c e and F.S. Chapin I I I , J.C. S c h u l t z , G. P u t t i c k and J . Glyphis f o r comments on a v e r s i o n of t h i s paper.

L i t e r a t u r e Cited 1.

2.

3. 4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

Rosenthal, G.A.; Janzen D.H., Eds.; "Herbivores. Their I n t e r a c t i o n w i t h Secondary P l a n t M e t a b o l i t e s " . Academic Press: N.Y., 1979, p 718. Feeny, P.P. Wallace, J . ; M a n s e l l , R. Eds.;"Biochemical I n t e r a c t i o n s between P l a n t s and I n s e c t s " . Recent Adv. Phytochemistry 1979, 10, 1-40. Faeth, S.H.; Mopper, S.; Simberloff D. Oikos 1981, 37, 238251. Mooney, H.A.; Gulmon, S.L. BioScience 1982, 32, 198-206. Mattson, W.J. Ann. Rev. E c o l . Syst. 1980, 11, 119-161. Mooney, H.A.; Gulmon, S.L. "Plant P o p u l a t i o n B i o l o g y " . S o l b r i g , O.T.; J a i n , S. Johnson G.B.; Raven, P.H. eds.; Columbia U n i v e r s i t y Press N.Y. 1979: p 316. Gulmon, S; Chu, C. Oecologia 1981, 49, 207-212. Mooney, H.A.; F i e l d , C.; Gulmon, S.L.; Bazzaz, F.A. Oecologia 1981, 50, 109-112. Tso, T.C. "Physiology and Biochemistry of Tobacco P l a n t s " . Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc. Pa. p 393.



2.

MOONEY E T AL.

Plant Chemical

Defenses

10. Dement, W.A.; Mooney, H.A. Oecologia 1974, 15, 65-76. 11. Mooney, H.A.; Kummerow, J.; Johnson, A.W.; Parsons, D.J.; Keeley, S.; Hoffmann, A.; Hays, R.I.; Giliberto J . ; Chu, C. "Convergent E v o l u t i o n in C h i l e and California. Mooney, H.A. Ed.; Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross Inc. Stroudsberg, Pa. 1977, p 85. 12. Rhoades, D.; Cates, R.G. "Biochemical I n t e r a c t i o n s Between P l a n t s and I n s e c t s " Wallace, J . ; M a n s e l l , R.; Eds. Rec. Adv. Phyto Chem. 10, 168-213. Plenum Press N.Y. London. 13. Ryan, D.F.; Bormann, F.H. BioScience 1982, 32, 29-32. 14. Derman, B.D.; Rupp, D.C.; Nooden, L.D. Amer. J. Bot. 1978, 65, 205-213. 15. T a y l o r , B.K.; May, L.H. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1967, 20, 389411. 16. Kramer, P.J.; K o z l o w s k i , T.T. "Physiology of Woody P l a n t s " Academic Press N.Y., San F r a n c i s c o , London, 1979 17. Tso, T.C.; Jeffrey R.N. Arch. Biochem, Biophys. 1961, 92, 253-6. 18. S e i g l e r , D.S. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 1977, 5, 195-199. 19. Robinson, T. Science 1974, 184, 430-435. 20. D i g e n i s , G.A. J. Pharm. Sci. 1969, 58, 39-42. 21. Clegg, D.O.; Conn, E.; Janzen, D. Nature 1979, 278, 343344. 22. Waller, G.R.; Nowacki, E.K. " A l k a l o i d Biology and Metabolism in P l a n t s " . Plenum P r e s s . N.Y., 1978, p 194. 23. McKey, D. Am. Nat. 1974, 108, 305-320. 24. Beadle, N.C.W. Ecology 1953, 34, 426-428. 25. Vitousek, P.M.; R e i n e r s , W.A. B i o S c i e n c e 1975, 25, 376-381. 26. M u l l e r , R.N.; Bormann, F.H. Science 1976, 193, 1126-1128. 27. Mahall B.E.; Bormann, F.H. Bot. Gaz. 1978, 139, 467-481. 28. Herridge, D.F.; Pate, J.S. P l a n t P h y s i o l . 1977, 60, 759764. 29. Mooney, H.A.; Rundel, P.W. B o t a n i c a l Gazette 1979, 140, 109-113. 30. Fritts, H.C. "Tree Rings and Climate". Academic Press, London, 1976, p 567. 31. Dougherty, P.M.; Teskey, R.O.; Phelps, J.E.; H i n c k l e y , T.M. P l a n t P h y s i o l . 1979, 64, 930-935. 32. L i n c o l n , D.E. Biochem. Syst. and E c o l . 1980, 8, 397-400. 33. Satoo, T. " A n a l y s i s of Temperate Forest Ecosystem". R e i c h l e , D.E. Ed. Springer V e r l a g , Heidelberg, N. Y., 1970, p. 55 34. T a y l o r , F.G. Jr. "Phenology and S e a s o n a l i t y Modeling", Helmut L i e t h (Ed), S p r i n g e r - V e r l a g , N.Y., Heidelberg Berlin, 1974, p.237. 35. Kozlowski, T.T.; Keller, T. Bot. Rev. 1966, 32, 293-382. 36. Hansen, P. Physiol. P l a n t . 1971, 25, 469-473. 37. Haukioja, E. Holartic Ecology 1979, 2, 272-274. 38. Farnsworth, C.E. Ecology 1955, 36, 285-292.


36

39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44.


45. 46. 47. 48. 49.


K i e n h o l z , R. E c o l . 1941, 22, 249-258. Kramer, P.J. P l a n t P h y s i o l . 1943, 18, 239-251. Ahlgren, C.E. Ecology 1957, 38, 622-682. Feeny, P.P. Ecology 1970, 51, 565-581. Hough, J.A.; Pimental, D. E n v i r . Entomol. 1978, 7, 97-102. S c h u l t z , J.C.; Nothnagle, P.J.; Baldwin, I.T. Am. J . Bot. 1982, 69, 753-759. S c r i b e r , J.M.; Stansky, F. Jr. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 1981, 26, 183-211. Cates, R.G. Oecologia 1980, 46, 22-31. Bernays, E.A. E c o l . Ent. 1981, 6, 353-360. Haukioya, E.; Niemelä, L.; Iso-Iivari; O j a l a , H.; Aro, E. Rep Kevo S u b a r c t i c Res. S t a t . 1978, 14, 5-12. Mooney, H.A.; Hays, R.L. F l o r a 1973, 162, 295-304.

RECEIVED September 28,

1982


Plant Resistance to Insects - American Chemical Society

Recommend Documents