348
INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY
Discussion of Results Analyses of the coals are given in Table I. The results of special tests and the effects of oxidation on the characteristics measured by these tests for samples from Henry, Macoupin, and Gallatin Counties are listed in Table 11. Table I11 presents data on a Franklin County whole coal in which exposure was made on -40 +60 mesh coal for both reactivity and agglutinating tests. The main purpose of this study was to determine the effect of oxidation of laboratory samples during storage on the characteristic ignition temperatures and B. S. I. values. Although the agglutinating value data are not complete, they serve their purpose of demonstrating that oxidation did take place. This test was used because it has been found quite sensitive to oxidation of samples. The sample from Macoupin County designated as durain (Table 11) appeared to be durain when picked in the mine, but later examination in the laboratory indicated that it was mainly a dull clarain. The other hand-picked banded ingredients were probably not pure ingredients but, it is believed, were concentrates of sufficient purity to show the predominating characteristics.
TABLE 111. DATAFOR FRANKLIN COUNTY WHOLE-COAL
SAMPLE (2-2445
Ignition Temperature 'TIS,C . Tn, C. Days stored 182 229 1 184 232 14 IS2 228 37 184 230 127 182 228 135 a Based on average of eleven buttons.
Agglutinating Value Kg. Days stored 5.1 0 3.9 15 3.1 39
...
2.0s
...
132
Vol. 35, No, 3
though quite appreciable for -200 mesh samples. To answer this question a whole coal from Franklin County, Ill., was exposed in -40 +60 mesh size for both ignition temperature and agglutinating value tests. For the agglutinating value tests the -40 +60 mesh material was ground to -200 mesh at the time of the tests. The results obtained (Table 111) indicate that oxidation did take place in the -40 +60 mesh size as evidenced by the decreasing agglutinating values with increased time of exposure. At the same time characteristic ignition temperatures remained practically the same. I n the interpretation of the effect of oxidation on the British swelling index, a value three times the standard deviation was taken as a limit. This limit was found to be 0.9. A difference of one unit, therefore, was considered significant. The data in Table 11, in general agreement with previous experience (6),indicate that the B. s. I. numbers decrease with increased exposure time of samples. The values for the higher rank Gallatin County samples show a smaller decrease than those for the lower rank coals from Henry and Macoupin Counties. Values for cIarain from Henry and Gallatin Counties shoIy the smallest decrease of the banded ingredients from these two sources. Fusain does not swell, and the values greater than 1 in Table I1 indicate the presence of other swelling coal material in these samples. Attention is called to the fact that original B. S. I. numbers for whole coals are higher than those for individual petrographic constituents. Although no definite reason can be given for this a t present, the authors have recently noted that the addition of small amounts of fusain to clarain and vitrain results in small increases in B. S. I. numbers for these two constituents. Additional studies are being made. Conclusions
A considerable amount of data is presented for comparison of the characteristics of different rank coals and banded ingredients. However, only the effect of oxidation on these characteristics is considered here. Comparisons based on these data and other information not included in this paper will be considered in another report. I n order to judge whether the rather small differences in characteristic ignition temperatures as related to various times of laboratory exposure were significant, it was necessary to have some basis of interpretation. For this purpose standard deviations for duplicate and triplicate values of T16and Tt5 were calculated. Values three times these standard deviations were used as limits. They were found to be 12" and 11.5' C., respectively. It was considered that, if variations exceeding these limits were found, they would indicate a significant trend. Table I1 shows that the differences in characteristic ignition temperatures, determined after various times of exposure compared to the original values are, in general, considerably smaller than these limiting values. I n some cases higher values are reported for samples exposed for longer times. This is more noticeable for the lower rank coals fram Henry and Macoupin Counties than for the higher rank coal from Gallatin County. However, it is not possible to estimate the significance of these small increases on the basis of the limited data included in this report. It is concluded that laboratory exposure up to 8 or 9 months does not affect significantly the characteristic ignition temperatures of the samples studied. At the same time the agglutinating value data indicate that oxidation of samples did take place. This is evidenced by the decreasing values as exposure time increases. It was mentioned earlier that exposure of samples was made in the size used for the various tests. Exposure of reactivity samples was in -40 +60 mesh size and of agglutinating value samples in -200 mesh size. The question arose as to whether oxidation of -40 +60 mesh coal might be negligible even
1. Exposure of -40 +60 mesh samples of whole coal and banded ingredients up to 8 or 9 months to the laboratory atmosphere does not appear to influence significantly the characteristic ignition temperatures of these samples. 2. B. S. I. numbers decrease with increased time of exposure of samples. 3. B. S. I. numbers of the higher rank Gallatin County coal show less decrease with increased time of exposure than do the lower rank coals.
Literature Cited (1) Am. Soo. Testing Materials, Standards on Coal and Coke, p. 95 (1938). (2) Am. SOC.Testing Materials, Standard Methods of Laboratory Sampling and Analysis of Coal and Coke, D271-37 (1939). (3) Brit. Standards Inst., Pub. 804 (1938). (4) Ostborg, H. N., Limbaoher, H. R., and Sherman, R. A., Proc. Am. SOC.Testing Materials, Preprint 81 (1942). ( 5 ) Rose, H. J., and Sebastian, J. J. S., Trans. Am. Inst. Mining Met. Engrs., 88, 556 (1930). (6) Sebastian, J. J. S., and Mayers, M. A,, IND.ENQ.CHEM.,29, 1118 (1937). (7) Sherman, R. A., Pilcher, J. M., and Ostborg, H. N., Am. SOC. Testing Materials, Bull. 112, 23 (1941). PRESENTED before the Division of Gas and Fuel Chemistry a t the 104th Meeting of the AMERICANCHEMICALSOCIETY,Buffalo, N. Y. Published with the permission of the Chief, Illinoie State Geological Survey.
Possible New Uses for Coal-Correction An unfortunate error has been found in the article by H. C. Howard (February issue of IKDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY).At the bottom of the second column, page 156, the structural formulas of brazan and fluorenone, as well as their respective carbon-hydrogen ratios, were interchanged.
