Publishing More Industrial Research: Maybe We Can Help - Analytical

Jun 1, 2000 - Publishing More Industrial Research: Maybe We Can Help. Thomas L. Chester. Anal. Chem. , 2000, 72 (11), pp 373 A–373 A. DOI: 10.1021/ ...
0 downloads 0 Views 76KB Size
e d i to ri a l

Publishing More Industrial Research: Maybe We Can Help I

ndustrial analytical chemists benefit greatly from reading Analytical Chemistry, but these readers, with respect to their numbers, rarely contribute to the Journal. Is this just the nature of industrial jobs, or are other factors at work? In my view, there are three important factors: Some employers discourage or prohibit publication; other employers only tolerate publication as long as it causes no harm to the business or delays the “real” work of the company; and many industrial researchers are just too discouraged to attempt publishing, even if it is allowed. There are many reasons why it makes good business sense to publish some fraction of industrial research, particularly in analytical chemistry. For example, disclosure and peer review through publication help advocate new analytical methods as industry standards. These are also good first steps for building persuasive arguments leading to more formal regulatory approval of new methods or techniques. External peer review also ensures that the work meets a high standard and can stimulate additional improvements. This can be valuable both to individuals and to their work environment. Publication also provides an employer with an unimpeded right to practice employees’ inventions when patenting is not part of the company’s business goals. This is often the case in businesses that do analytical chemistry but have no analytical products. Without disclosure, a competitor could eventually patent a similar invention and thereby block its practice or require royalties. Some contributing factors to author’s discouragement and disinterest in publishing arise from outside their employers’ businesses. Here, we have a chance to help. Publishers should cooperatively adopt an industry-standard, copyright-transfer form that reflects their interests and those of authors and their employers. Most industrial authors are considered to perform works made for hire. When copyright is transferred, intellectual property belonging to an employer is signed over to a publisher. Therefore, many employers require that a copyright transfer form, like any contract, be approved by an attorney and executed by

an appropriate officer. If the employer conducts diversified research, the attorneys must deal with different transfer forms from dozens of publishers. All of these forms accomplish essentially the same things, but each has to be approved individually. This creates redundancy and extra work for the attorneys and delays and discouragement for authors. These problems could easily be eliminated with a little cooperation within the publishing industry. Publishers should automatically grant permission to authors to reuse their own tables and figures in derivative scholarly works. Also, publishers should not insist that authors who reuse their own work provide written permission from the first publisher. ACS, in its copyright transfer form, grants permission to the original authors to publish derivative works, but this is not the case among all publishers. Requirements for demonstrating permission vary. Regardless, it is common for an author writing a derivative work or a review to spend many hours identifying publishers, finding addresses, sending permission requests, keeping track of responses, and inserting the correct permission wording into the manuscript. This is particularly discouraging when the author is reapplying his or her own work. All publishers should grant this permission automatically and accept when this has been done by others. These are two very small steps, but if ACS exists for the members and not vice versa, shouldn’t we expect it and other scientific societies to address these barriers to individual professionalism and champion these sorts of improvements among publishers? Perhaps analytical chemists can be the catalysts of change. And perhaps we’ll see more industrial contributions within these pages.

Thomas L. Chester The Procter & Gamble Company [email protected]

J U N E 1 , 2 0 0 0 / A N A LY T I C A L C H E M I S T R Y

373 A

EDITOR Royce W. Murray University of North Carolina

ASSOCIATE EDITORS Daniel W. Armstrong

Reinhard Niessner

University of Missouri–Rolla

Technische Universität München (Germany)

Catherine C. Fenselau

Robert A. Osteryoung

University of Maryland

North Carolina State University

William S. Hancock

Edward S. Yeung

AgilentTechnologies

Iowa State University/Ames Laboratory

EDITORIAL HEADQUARTERS Research section Department of Chemistry Venable and Kenan Laboratories University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290 Phone: 919-962-2541; Fax: 919-962-2542; E-mail: [email protected]

A-page section 1155 16th St., N.W. Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202-872-4570;TDD: 202-872-6076 Fax: 202-872-4574; E-mail: [email protected] Managing Editor: Alan R. Newman Associate Editor: Felicia Wach Assistant Editors: Britt Erickson, James R. Riordon, Elizabeth Zubritsky Editorial Assistant: Wilder Damian Smith Web Editor: Christine Brennan Contributing Editors: David Bradley, U.K., Gerald Keller, U.S., Marcia Vogel, U.S., Thomas J. Wenzel, Bates College

Production Editor: Doug Roemer Art Director: Sean Kennedy Electronic Composition: Dorinda J. Edmondson Journals Associate Editor: Lorraine Gibb Assistant Editor: Ruth Wardle Circulation Manager: Scott Nathan

Editorial Advisory Board

William B. Whitten

John Fetzer

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Chevron Research andTechnology

Luc Bousse

Stephen A. Wise

Robert T. Kennedy

CaliperTechnologies

University of Florida

Frank V. Bright

National Institute of Standards andTechnology

State University of NewYork at Buffalo

Vicki H. Wysocki

University of Southern Denmark

Steven A. Carr

University of Arizona

Kay Niemax

Robert M. Corn

Ex-Officio Member

Institute for Spectrochemistry and Applied Spectroscopy (Germany)

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Theodore R. Williams

J. David Pinkston

Andrew Ewing

College of Wooster

Procter & Gamble

SmithKline Beecham

Matthias Mann

Kimberly Prather

Pennsylvania State University

Totaro Imasaka

A-page Advisory Panel

University of California–Riverside

Kyushu University (Japan)

Klaus Albert

Peter Schoenmakers

Viorica Lopez-Avila

University ofTubingen (Germany)

Midwest Research Institute

Philip Bartlett

Shell Research andTechnology (The Netherlands)

Andreas Manz

University of Southhampton (U.K.)

Robert L. St. Claire

Imperial College of Science,Technology and Medicine (U.K.)

Alain Berthod

Triangle Pharmaceuticals

Zbigniew Stojek

Klaus H. Mosbach

National Center for Scientific Research (France)

University of Lund (Sweden)

Tibor Braun

Karen Wahl

Janusz Pawliszyn

Eötvös University (Hungary)

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

University of Waterloo (Canada)

Sylvia Daunert

Douglas Westerlund

Antonio J. Ricco

University of Kentucky

Uppsala University (Sweden)

ACLARA Biosciences

Marta E. Diaz-Garcia

John Yates

Robert S. Rush

Universidad de Oviedo (Spain)

Scripps Research Institute

Amgen

Francesco Dondi

Renato Zenobi

Isiah M. Warner

University of Ferrara (Italy)

Louisiana State University

Christine E. Evans

Swiss Federal Institute ofTechnology Zurich

University of Warsaw (Poland)

University of Michigan

Publications Division Director: Robert D. Bovenschulte Director, Publishing Operations: Mary E. Scanlan General Manager, Special Publications: Mary Warner Journals Editing Manager: Debora A. Bittaker General Manager, Publishing & Creative Services: William Succolosky Manager, Copy Editing: Elizabeth Wood Manager, Production & Imaging: Vincent L. Parker Manager, Creative Services: Julie Farrar