Purine Biosynthesis by AMPK - ACS Publications - American

Article

Subscriber access provided by SUNY DOWNSTATE

Sequestration-mediated downregulation of de novo purine biosynthesis by AMPK Danielle L Schmitt, Yun-ju Cheng, Junyong Park, and Songon An ACS Chem. Biol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00039 • Publication Date (Web): 29 Apr 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 3, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

ACS Chemical Biology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Chemical Biology

Sequestration-mediated downregulation of de novo purine biosynthesis by AMPK Danielle L. Schmitt1, Yun-ju Cheng2, Junyong Park2, and Songon An1* 1

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics,

University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dr. Songon An Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Maryland Baltimore County 1000 Hilltop Circle Chemistry 462A Baltimore, MD 21250 Email: [email protected] Tel.: (+1-410) 455-2514 Fax: (+1-410) 455-1874

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 28

Abstract

Dynamic partitioning of de novo purine biosynthetic enzymes into multienzyme compartments, purinosomes, has been associated with increased flux of de novo purine biosynthesis in human cells. However, we do not know of a mechanism by which de novo purine biosynthesis would be downregulated in cells. We have investigated the functional role of AMPactivated protein kinase (AMPK) in the regulation of de novo purine biosynthesis because of its regulatory action on lipid and carbohydrate biosynthetic pathways. Using pharmacological AMPK activators, we have monitored subcellular localizations of six pathway enzymes tagged with green fluorescent proteins under time-lapse fluorescence single-cell microscopy. We revealed that only one out of six pathway enzymes, formylglycinamidine ribonucleotide synthase (FGAMS), formed spatially distinct cytoplasmic granules after treatment with AMPK activators, indicating the formation of single-enzyme self-assemblies. In addition, subsequent biophysical studies using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching showed that the diffusion kinetics of FGAMS were slower when it localized inside the self-assemblies than within the purinosomes. Importantly, high-performance liquid chromatographic studies revealed that the formation of AMPK-promoted FGAMS self-assembly caused the reduction of the cellular levels of purine metabolites in HeLa cells, indicating the downregulation of de novo purine biosynthesis. Collectively, we demonstrate here that the spatial sequestration of FGAMS by AMPK is a mechanism by which de novo purine biosynthesis is downregulated in human cells.


2

Page 3 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Introduction De novo purine biosynthesis is a ten-step enzymatic process catalyzed by six cytoplasmic enzymes, three of which are multifunctional. In this pathway, phosphoribosylpyrophosphate is converted to inosine monophosphate (IMP) in a process requiring a multitude of cofactors and four moles of ATP. In addition, de novo purine biosynthetic enzymes have been shown to compartmentalize into metabolic complexes, namely the purinosomes, in human cancer cells.1, 2 Purinosome formation has been functionally correlated with the increased rate of de novo purine biosynthesis,3 followed by an increased pool of the final product, IMP.4 Recently, cellular signaling pathways have been identified to control the activity of de novo purine biosynthesis. 5-8 Collectively, purinosome formation appears to be the mechanism for a cell to upregulate de novo purine biosynthesis. However, the basal level activity of de novo purine biosynthesis has been detected in the absence of purinosome assemblies or under conditions in which purinosome formation was not favorable.3, 4, 9 These data imply that purinosome-negative cells maintain a certain level of metabolic activity of de novo purine biosynthesis. Nevertheless, a downregulation mechanism of de novo purine biosynthesis has been elusive to date. We have sought to understand how AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation metabolically influences de novo purine biosynthesis in live human cells. AMPK is a key energy regulator in the cell, responding to the increased ratio of AMP:ATP for energy homeostasis.10 AMPK consists of three subunits: a kinase domain α and two regulatory subunits β and γ. In addition to AMP as an AMPK activator, the metabolic intermediate of the 8th step of de novo purine biosynthesis, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (ZMP in this article), is characterized as an allosteric activator of AMPK; both bind to the nucleotide-binding pocket in the γ subunit.11, 12 Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of the folate-requiring steps 3 and 9 of de novo purine biosynthesis was shown to temporally increase ZMP levels in cells, subsequently activating AMPK.13-15 However, the influence of AMPK activation on de novo purine biosynthesis, the other way around, has not been elucidated at the molecular level. In this work, we reveal that AMPK activators promote the spatial rearrangement of the subcellular localization of one of purine biosynthetic enzymes, formylglycinamidine ribonucleotide synthase (FGAMS), which catalyzes the 4th step of the pathway. The other five enzymes are unaffected by AMPK activation, indicating that the self-assembly of FGAMS is


3


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 28

metabolically independent of the purinosome assembly. In addition, we demonstrate that AMPK activation decreases the steady-state levels of IMP, AMP, GMP and ATP, implying the downregulation of de novo purine biosynthesis. Furthermore, we show that the FGAMS selfassembly is biologically different from the purinosome and spatially distinguishable from other cellular bodies within the cytoplasm, including autophagosomes, lysosomes and other lipidbound organelles. Given that FGAMS is structurally one of the core elements of the purinosome assembly,2, 16 we conclude that the spatial sequestration of FGAMS by AMPK is the mechanism by which de novo purine biosynthesis is downregulated in human cells.

Results AMPK-activating small molecules induced clustering of FGAMS-EGFP: To determine the mechanism of AMPK action on de novo purine biosynthesis at the molecular level, we expressed a reporter protein with an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) tag in live HeLa cells. Given the reversible compartmentalization property of the EGFP-tagged FGAMS (i.e. FGAMS-EGFP) in live cells,1 we studied the effect of three subgroups of AMPK activators on the subcellular localization of FGAMS-EGFP. First, HeLa cells expressing FGAMS-EGFP were treated with 150-300 µM of cell-permeable 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside (AICAR). Based on the mechanism of AICAR’s action in HeLa cells, exogenously supplied AICAR will contribute to an temporal increase of cellular ZMP level within an hour,11, 17 which in turn binds to the γ subunit to allosterically activate AMPK in cultured cell systems.18 We treated HeLa cells with 200 µM AICAR, in which FGAMS-EGFP is distributed diffusively in the cytoplasm. We monitored spatial clustering of FGAMS-EGFP in ~45% of transfected cells after 4 hr incubation (Figure 1A and 1B). Similarly, under immunofluorescence microscopy, we observed the cytosolic clustering of endogenous FGAMS in fixed HeLa cells after the treatment of 200 µM AICAR (Supplementary Figure S1). Second, we treated HeLa cells with biguanides, metformin (170-430 µM) and phenformin (210-410 µM), which are also known to indirectly activate AMPK through the inhibition of mitochondrial electron transfer organization.19 Likewise, both biguanide AMPK activators were found to induce the clustering of FGAMSEGFP in ~69% and ~23% of transfected HeLa cells, respectively (Figure 1C-1F). Third, we treated HeLa cells with 100 µM A769662, which bind in a pocket between the α and β subunits of AMPK resulting in allosteric activation.20 After 4 hr of A769662 incubation, we monitored


4

Page 5 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


that ~21% of HeLa cells displayed FGAMS-EGFP clusters (Figure 1G and 1H). As negative controls, a purine salvage enzyme, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1), fused with EGFP (i.e. HPRT1-EGFP) was also subjected to our pharmacological studies. However, HPRT1-EGFP remained diffusive throughout the cytoplasm in the presence of either AICAR (250 µM) or metformin (170-290 µM) (Figure 1I-1L). HeLa cells expressing EGFP alone also showed no change in its localization for ~ 5 hr in the presence of 300 µM AICAR, indicating no interference by the EGFP tag (Supplementary Figure S2). Additionally, we confirmed the activation of AMPK by immunostaining the phospho-Thr172 of AMPK with monoclonal antibody in non-transfected HeLa cells after 4 hr incubation with 200 µM AICAR and 170 µM metformin, respectively (Supplementary Figure S3). Collectively, we conclude that the clustering of FGAMS-EGFP is promoted by pharmacologically activated AMPK in HeLa cells.

AMPK activation-mediated clusters of FGAMS-EGFP did not recruit other purine biosynthetic enzymes: We next determined the effect of AICAR treatment on five other purine biosynthetic enzymes. First, we evaluated the enzymes involved in the core structure of the purinosome based on previous studies.2, 16 Since FGAMS robustly formed clusters in the presence of AICAR, the co-clustering of phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate amidotransferase (PPAT) and a trifucntional enzyme possessing the activities of glycinamide ribonucleotide synthetase, glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase and aminoimidazole ribonucleotide synthase (namely, TrifGART) would indicate the formation of the core structure of purinosomes. However, EGFP-tagged PPAT (i.e. PPAT-GFP), which catalyzes the first step of de novo purine biosynthesis, remained diffusive throughout the cytoplasm in the presence of 200 µM AICAR (Figure 2A and 2B). GFPS65T-tagged TrifGART (i.e. TrifGART-GFP; steps 2, 3 and 5) did not respond to 200 µM AICAR in HeLa cells, either (Figure 2C and 2D). It appears that the core structure of the purinosome does not form in the presence of AICAR. Second, we further expanded our localization studies to the rest of pathway enzymes. EGFP-tagged phosphoribosyl aminoimidazole carboxylase/phosphoribosyl aminoimidazole succinocarboxamine synthetase (PAICS-EGFP, steps 6 and 7) was exposed to 200 µM AICAR in HeLa cells for 4 hr, but it remained diffusive in our conditions (Figure 2E and 2F). Adenylosuccinate lyase tagged with EGFP (ASL-EGFP, step 8), which catalyzes the production


5


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 28

of ZMP, was not responsive to 200 µM AICAR, either (Figure 2G and 2H). Even EGFP-tagged aminoimidazolecarboxamide ribonucleotide transformylase/IMP cyclohydrolase (EGFP-ATIC, steps 9 and 10), which consumes ZMP, remained diffusive in the presence of 150-300 µM AICAR (Figure 2I and 2J) or 172 µM metformin (Supplementary Figure S4) in HeLa cells, respectively. Thus, other than FGAMS-EGFP, no purine biosynthetic enzymes spatially compartmentalize into the observed cytosolic granules upon AMPK activation. Third, we examined whether co-expression of purine enzymes with FGAMS would promote co-clustering events. We prepared HeLa cells co-expressing EGFP-ATIC with orange fluorescent protein-tagged FGAMS (FGAMS-OFP). Indeed, 200 µM AICAR and 290 µM metformin promoted the clustering of FGAMS-OFP, but EGFP-ATIC remained diffusive throughout the cytoplasm, respectively (Figure 3). These data indicate that the FGAMS clustering does not recruit other pathway enzymes and also that the clustering event is independent to the stoichiometric expression levels of the transfected pathway enzymes in cells. Collectively, these data support that the self-assembly of FGAMS is promoted in response to AMPK activation in HeLa cells.

The formation of FGAMS self-assembly is directly associated with activated AMPK: We have also used small hairpin RNAs to knock down both AMPK α1 and α2 isoforms in HeLa cells (i.e. shRNAAMPK). After dual transfection of shRNAAMPK with a plasmid expressing FGAMS-EGFP, we treated the transfected HeLa cells with 200 µM AICAR for 4 hr. We observed that ~15 ± 4% of cells exhibited clusters of FGAMS-EGFP (Figure 4), indicating the knock-down of AMPK impaired the AICAR-induced activation of AMPK. In contrast, ~38 ± 9% of HeLa cells transfected with scrambled shRNAs (i.e. shRNAControl ) and FGAMS-EGFP promoted fluorescent clusters in response to 200 µM AICAR (Figure 4), which is in good agreement with our observation presented in Figure 1A-B. Along with our extensive pharmacological studies, these data strongly support that the clustering of FGAMS-EGFP in response to AMPK activators is directly associated with AMPK.

Characterization of the FGAMS self-assembly versus the purinosome in HeLa cells: It appears clear that the observed FGAMS self-assemblies above are not the purinosomes based on our imaging studies. We wonder whether there would be an alternative strategy, which would


6

Page 7 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


distinguish the FGAMS self-assembly from the purinosome. First, we quantitatively compared two sets of fluorescent images obtained from the AICAR-treated cluster-positive HeLa cells and the purinosome-positive HeLa cells1 from purine-deficient medium. Unfortunately, their average sizes were very similar each other so that these two assemblies were indistinguishable (Supplementary Figure S5); 0.46 µm2 versus 0.52 µm2 for FGAMS self-assemblies and purinosomes, respectively. Next, we measured apparent diffusion coefficients (Dapp) of FGAMSEGFP in respective HeLa cells. To measure the diffusion coefficients of FGAMS-EGFP in the AICAR-treated cluster-positive HeLa cells, transfected HeLa cells were treated with 200 µM AICAR for 4 hr prior to fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). Independently, we also measured the diffusion coefficients of purinosome-associated FGAMS-EGFP in HeLa cells that were grown in purine-deficient conditions.1 Our FRAP analysis revealed that FGAMSEGFP involved in the self-assemblies showed a ~2-fold slower diffusion coefficient (Dapp = 0.0017 ± 0.0010 µm2/s; NFRAP = 20) than the diffusion coefficient of FGAMS-EGFP in the purinosome-positive HeLa cells (Dapp = 0.0042 ± 0.0026 µm2/s; NFRAP = 36) (Figure 5). Subsequent statistical analysis using three independent procedures (refer to Methods) revealed that all three p values between two groups were less than 0.0001, indicating their apparent diffusion coefficients are significantly different from each other. Due to the different protein composition between the self-assembly and the purinosome within the similar size of clusters, FGAMS-EGFP experiences statistically different molecular environments in two different spatial organizations.

FGAMS self-assemblies do not associate with other cellular bodies or organelles: Since the FGAMS self-assembly is different from the purinosome, we further compared the FGAMS self-assembly with other known cellular bodies and organelles. First, we co-imaged the FGAMS self-assemblies with lysosomes in HeLa cells. We used LysoTracker Red to concurrently visualize lysosomes with FGAMS self-assemblies in AICAR-treated HeLa cells. Dual-color imaging revealed that the AICAR-induced FGAMS-EGFP clusters did not co-localize with lysosomes (Supplementary Figure S6A-C). Second, we investigated if AICAR-induced FGAMSGFP clusters would associate with mitochondria or any other lipid-bound organelles. Cellular staining of mitochondria and lipid-bound organelles confirmed that the self-assemblies of FGAMS-EGFP did not co-localize with these organelles in our conditions (Supplementary


7


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 28

Figure S6D-I). Third, we sought to determine if the observed FGAMS-EGFP clusters were associated with autophagosomes. The activation of AMPK is also known to subsequently activate autophagy in cells.21, 22 To visualize endogenous autophagosomes, the membraneassociated protein LC3 was targeted in immunocytochemistry.21 That is, fixed HeLa cells displaying AICAR-induced FGAMS-EGFP assemblies were treated with LC3-specific antibody, with the result showing that LC3 and the FGAMS-GFP self-assemblies did not co-localize (Supplementary Figure S6J-L). Collectively, the FGAMS self-assembly is an independent cellular granule of the organelles and other cellular bodies, including the purinosome.

Metabolic effect of AICAR treatment on purine nucleotide pools: In order to assess if the self-assemblies of FGAMS-EGFP result in any alterations in purine nucleotide pools, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was employed to measure the steady-state levels of purine metabolites. Lawns of HeLa cells were incubated for 4 hr with 200 µM AICAR, and subsequently cellular nucleotides were extracted (as described in Methods). Our data revealed that the cellular levels of various nucleotides apparently changed in response to AICAR treatment. According to our peak assignment using commercially available standards of purine intermediates, we monitored the decreased levels of IMP, AMP, GMP and ATP (Figure 6). Quantitatively, IMP, AMP, GMP and ATP were decreased ~19 ± 12%, ~44 ± 19%, ~80 ± 5% and ~13 ± 1%, respectively, after 4 hr of AICAR treatment. Subsequent statistical analysis using one-sample t-test with one-tailed rejection region23 showed that the cellular levels of purine metabolites are significantly reduced in the presence of AICAR. These data strongly indicate that pharmacological activation of AMPK downregulates de novo purine biosynthesis. Collectively, we propose that activated AMPK spatially sequesters FGAMS from the other pathway enzymes to downregulate de novo purine biosynthesis in HeLa cells.

Discussion A metabolic intermediate of purine biosynthesis, ZMP, is a well-characterized allosteric activator of AMPK, which is responsible for maintaining cellular energy homeostasis.10 However, AMPK’s action on de novo purine biosynthesis has not been explored in detail and largely remains elusive. In this work, we investigated the biochemical and cellular relationship between AMPK and de novo purine biosynthesis in the presence of small molecules and


8

Page 9 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


shRNAs, respectively. Our inquiry has unveiled an unanticipated mechanism by which de novo purine biosynthesis is downregulated in a cell. We propose that the downregulation of the pathway is achieved through the spatial sequestration of FGAMS into its own self-assemblies from the rest of pathway enzymes. In addition, we demonstrate three different strategies to distinguish the self-assembly of FGAMS from the purinosome. First, examining all the enzyme components involved in de novo purine biosynthesis provides the most compelling evidence for determining whether the purinosome or the FGAMS self-assembly is involved in given cellular mechanisms. Second, measuring the diffusion coefficient of FGAMS-EGFP dictates the nature of the subcellular protein compartments where FGAMS is localized. Due to the slower diffusion kinetics of FGAMS-EGFP inside its self-assembly, we demonstrate FRAP as a biophysical technique to distinguish these two assemblies in live cells. In this regard, we note that, due to different transcriptional and translational profiles in different cell lines,24 it was not surprising that the diffusion coefficients of FGAMS-EGFP are not only assembly-dependent, but also the cell linedependent (this work versus Ref 2). Third, profiling metabolic changes of purine metabolites indicates whether the observed compartments in single cells are purinosomes or FGAMS selfassemblies. Purinosome formation was associated with the increased level of IMP,4 whereas we showed here that the formation of FGAMS self-assemblies decreased the steady-state levels of purine metabolites of IMP, AMP, GMP and ATP (Figure 6). HPLC-assisted metabolic profiling of cellular nucleotide pools was sensitive enough to demonstrate the downregulation of de novo purine biosynthesis. Therefore, given that the spatial compartmentalization of FGAMS under fluorescence imaging could indicate either upregulation or downregulation of de novo purine biosynthesis, it appears critical to corroborate the activity of de novo purine biosynthesis with alternative strategies beyond cellular imaging. It is also important to discuss here the authenticity of the FGAMS self-assembly in cells. Our FRAP measurement showed the mobility of FGAMS-EGFP when it is involved in the selfassembly. It means that this assembly is not formed by insoluble protein aggregates and are different from protein aggresomes,25, 26 which previously showed no fluorescence recovery during our FRAP studies.2 In addition, the FGAMS self-assembly is spatially different from membrane-bound organelles, including lysosomes, mitochondria, and autophagosomes, the latter of which might be activated by AMPK under our conditions. Furthermore, the AICAR-induced


9


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 28

clustering of endogenous FGAMS was also observed in fixed HeLa cells by immunocytochemistry. Lastly, self-assembled FGAMS, whose enzymatic activity remained intact, was observed in vitro several decades ago by Buchanan and coworkers27 although the observation has not been followed up afterwards. Taken together, we conclude that the FGAMS self-assembly is an independent, bona-fide phenomenon in the cell. Additionally, such self-assemblies have been observed with other metabolic enzymes involved in nucleotide biosynthesis in various organisms. For instance, filament, rod, and/or ring structures were formed by cytidine triphosphate synthase, glutamate dehydrogenase and/or inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase 2 in various organisms, including human cells.23, 24 Although it is not clear yet the biological significance of such novel cellular self-assemblies, their metabolic activities and non-metabolic moonlighting functions have been progressively elucidated.28-30 Of particular note, this phenomenon appears to be widespread among yeast metabolic enzymes.31-34 Although we do not know whether FGAMS is enzymatically active or inactive inside the self-assemblies under our conditions, the spatial sequestration of FGAMS from the other pathway enzymes metabolically downregulates the activity of de novo purine biosynthesis in HeLa cells. Collectively, the sequential metabolic enzymes in de novo purine biosynthesis are shown to form reversible multienzyme metabolic compartments, purinosomes, to upregulate the pathway in human cells.35 Now, we reveal an AMPK-mediated downregulation mechanism of de novo purine biosynthesis, which agrees with recent studies6, 7 showing the functional relationship between mechanistic target of rapamycin and de novo purine biosynthesis. We conclude here that human de novo purine biosynthesis can be turned on and off through the spatiotemporal rearrangement of the enzymes in cells.

Methods Materials - Plasmids expressing de novo purine biosynthetic enzymes conjugated with monomeric enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) or monomeric orange fluorescent protein (OFP) were mostly prepared previously.1 Note that EGFP in this article contains three point mutations, A206K, L221K, and F223R, which prevent potential GFP-mediated oligomerization of tagged proteins.36 We also prepared a new plasmid expressing EGFP-ATIC using the pEGFPC1 vector (Clontech) to replace the previous clone of GFP-ATIC,1 which was constructed to


10

Page 11 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


express GFPS65T-fusion proteins from the pC1-Neo vector (Promega). The cloned plasmid in this work was confirmed by restriction enzyme digestions and DNA sequencing (GeneWiz). The plasmids expressing shRNAAMPK (Cat# sc-45312-SH) and shRNAControl (Cat# sc-108060) were purchased from Santa Cruz. 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside (AICAR) and ribonucleotide (ZMP) were obtained from EMD Biosciences. Metformin, phenformin, IMP, AMP and GMP were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. A769662 was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. ATP was obtained from Invitrogen. Cellular staining reagents, including LysoTracker® Red DND-99 (Cat# L7528), 1,1'-dihexadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiIC16(3)) (Cat# D384) and MitroTracker®Orange CMTMRos (Cat# M7510) were obtained from Molecular Probes (Life Technologies). Cell Culture - Human cervix adenocarcinoma cell line, HeLa, was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. HeLa cells were maintained in either purine-rich medium (Minimum Essential Medium (MEM, Mediatech Cat# 10-010-CV) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Atlanta Biological) and 50 ug/mL gentamycin sulfate (Sigma)) or purinedepleted medium (Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 (RPMI 1640, Mediatech Cat# 10-040CV) supplemented with 10% dialyzed FBS (dFBS, Atlanta Biological) and 50 ug/mL gentamycin sulfate.2 Cells were kept at 37 oC, 95% humidity, and 5% CO2 in a HeraCell CO2 incubator. To assess mycoplasma status, the cells were maintained under the growth media supplemented with Plasmocin™ Prophylactic (InvivoGen) at a concentration of 5 µg/mL for at least four passages prior to experiments. Transfection - Cells were plated in an antibiotic-free growth medium to either glassbottomed 35-mm Petri dishes (MatTek) or 8-well chambers (LabTek). The following day, transfection was carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 or Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacture’s recommendation. After incubation with Lipofectamine-DNA complex for ~5 hr, the medium was replaced with a fresh growth medium and incubated overnight at 37 oC, 95% humidity, and 5% CO2. Prior to imaging, the transfected cells were washed for 10 min three times with buffered saline solution (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 135 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl, 2.5 or 5.6 mM glucose, and 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (Fisher Scientific)) and allowed to incubate in the dark at ambient temperature for at least 1 hr. Cells were then imaged in the buffered saline solution.


11


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 28

Fluorescence Live-Cell Imaging - All images were obtained using a Nikon Eclipse Ti fluorescence microscope equipped with a 60x 1.45 numerical aperture oil objective (Nikon CFI PlanApoTIRF). Images were collected using either Photometric CoolSNAP EZ monochrome CCD camera or photomultipliers mounted to a Nikon Eclipse Ti C2 confocal microscope. For wide-field imaging, EGFP was imaged with a set of Z488/10-HC cleanup, HC TIRF Dichroic and 525/50-HC emission filter (Chroma Technology Corp). OFP, Cy3, LysoTracker Red, MitoTracker Red, and DiI Stain were imaged with a set of Z561/10-HC cleanup, HC TIRF Dichroic and 600/50-HC emission filter (Chroma Technology Corp). For confocal imaging, a JDSU argon ion 488 laser line with a 488/561 dichroic mirror and 525/50 emission filter was used for EGFP detection. Data were obtained using NIS-Elements AR 4.13.04 (Nikon). Images were analyzed using the ImageJ processing package (the National Institutes of Health). Immunocytochemistry - Cells were fixed using 3% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature and permeabilized using 0.2% Triton-X in PBS for 5 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed and incubated with 5% normal donkey serum in PBS (Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 30 min at room temperature. After washing, cells were incubated with primary antibody (i.e. LC3A/B XP® Rabbit mAb (1:100, Cell Signaling), Rabbit anti-FGAMS Ab (1:1000, Bethyl Laboratories; Cat#A304-218A), Rabbit AMPKα (D5A2) mAb (1:100, Cell Signaling; Cat# 5831), and Rabbit Phospho-Thr172 AMPKα (40H9) mAb (1:100, Cell Signaling, Cat#2535)) for 30 min at room temperature, followed by Cy3-conjugated Goat antiRabbit secondary antibody (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 30 min. The fixed cells were then imaged in PBS. Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) - FRAP was performed using the instrumentation outlined above. For photobleaching, the argon ion 488 nm laser was used at 75% power for 1 sec. Before bleaching at least 10 images were obtained, and post-bleaching images were obtained approximately every second for at least 100 sec. Individual fluorescence recovery was normalized and corrected for background photobleaching and fitted as we described previously.2 Briefly, fluorescence recovery was individually fitted by the following equation after the degree of background photobleaching is normalized, −

FRAP(t ) = y 0 − A1e

t

τ 11 / 2

−

− A2 e

t

τ 21 / 2


12

Page 13 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


where τ1/2 is a diffusion time constant and t is the time (sec). Apparent diffusion coefficients (Dapp) were then calculated by the following equation, 2 re Dapp = 4τ 1 / 2 where re is a measured radius (µm) of a photobleached area. Statistical Analysis of FRAP data - We obtained the apparent diffusion coefficients, Dapp1 and Dapp2, of FGAMS-EGFP involved in AICAR-induced fluorescent clusters or purinosomes, respectively, in HeLa cells. Our statistical analysis was carried out with null hypothesis that the means of the apparent diffusion coefficients, Dapp1 and Dapp2, are the same between the two groups. We examined the equality of the apparent diffusion coefficients using three test procedures: one parametric test and two nonparametric tests. Since the equality of variances are violated based on the F-test,37 the Welch’s t-test38 was conducted as the two-sample t-test which is the most common testing procedure for comparison of two means values. In addition, two nonparametric tests were applied as well because, with the obtained data showing non-normal distributions, permutation test and Wilcoxon rank sum test procedures39 would be more appropriate without any specific distributional assumption than Welch’s t-test . Cluster Size Analysis - Cluster size analysis was accomplished using the ImageJ processing software (the National Institutes of Health). Fluorescent images were processed using ImageJ built-in modules. Briefly, raw 12-bit images were scaled according to the resolution of the microscope (i.e. 0.12 µm/pixel) before the Robust Automatic Threshold Selection (RATS) segmentation tool was used to identify fluorescent clusters within a cell by outlining. Default parameters for RATS were used in this analysis (i.e. noise threshold = 25, λ factor = 3). Once fluorescent clusters were isolated, the Inverse Look-up Table function was used to generate a mask of the original image that only displayed fluorescent clusters. The Analyze Particles module was then applied to this mask in order to attain both the number and area of fluorescent clusters within an image. This process was repeated for all subsequent cell images. The operator then evaluated the original cell images against the particle mask in order to eliminate data in which more than one cluster was counted as a single particle. The data were then analyzed and graphed using Microsoft Excel and Igor Pro (Wavemetrics). Nucleotide Extraction - Lawns of HeLa cells were harvested using 0.25% Trypsin, 2.21 mM EDTA (Corning, Cat# MT-25-053-CI) and washed using DPBS (Mediatech, Cat# MT-21-


13


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 28

031-CV). Nucleotides were then extracted using 10% perchloric acid followed by neutralization with 1 M potassium hydroxide.40 Lastly, the cell extracts were filtered through a 0.45 µm syringe filter and either used immediately or kept at -20 to -80 oC.15 High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) - HPLC was performed using a Partisil 10 SAX column (Hichrom) and Perkin Elmer Flexar HPLC equipped with a Quaternary LC Pump, Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography detector, Peltier LC Column Oven, and Peltier LC Autosampler. The following elution buffers were used to separate nucleotides from cell lysates; i.e. Buffer A, 7 mM potassium phosphate dibasic in 7 mM potassium chloride (pH 3.5); and Buffer B, 250 mM potassium phosphate dibasic in 500 mM potassium chloride (pH 4.5).40 Nucleotides eluted using a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min with a five minute equilibration in 100% Buffer A, 30 min gradient to Buffer B, and maintenance of 100% Buffer B for an additional 40 min. The nucleotides were detected by monitoring absorbance at 260 nm. Retention times of nucleotides were determined using commercially available standards. Data collection and peak analysis were performed using Chromera 4.1 (Perkin Elmer), Igor Pro (Wavemetrics), and Microsoft Excel.

Author Contribution S.A. and D.L.S. designed research; D.L.S. performed experiments; S.A. and D.L.S. analyzed data; Y.C. and J.P. performed statistical analysis; S.A. and D.L.S. wrote the paper.

Acknowledgement We thank UMBC for providing the Start-up fund to S.A and also for the SRAIS funding (to S.A.) for the presented study. D.L.S. was partially supported by NIH/NIGMS Training Grant (T32GM066706). We thank R. Karpel (UMBC) for critically reading the manuscript. We also thank G. Balaa, J. Wilhide, C. Kohnhorst, A. Sundaram, J. Ramirez, F. Augustine, D. Jaiswal, M. Kyoung and E. Green for their assistance on data analysis. Supporting Information Available: This material is available free of charge via the Internet.

References


14

Page 15 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


1.

An, S., Kumar, R., Sheets, E. D., and Benkovic, S. J. (2008) Reversible compartmentalization of de novo purine biosynthetic complexes in living cells, Science 320, 103-106.

2.

Kyoung, M., Russell, S. J., Kohnhorst, L. C., Esemoto, N. N., and An, S. (2015) Dynamic architecture of the purinosome involved in human de novo purine biosynthesis Biochemistry 54, 870-880.

3.

An, S., Deng, Y., Tomsho, J. W., Kyoung, M., and Benkovic, S. J. (2010) Microtubuleassisted mechanism for functional metabolic macromolecular complex formation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 12872-12876.

4.

Zhao, H., Chiaro, C. R., Zhang, L., Smith, P. B., Chan, C. Y., Pedley, A. M., Pugh, R. J., French, J. B., Patterson, A. D., and Benkovic, S. J. (2015) Quantitative analysis of purine nucleotides indicates that purinosomes increase de novo purine biosynthesis, J. Biol. Chem. 290, 6705-6713.

5.

An, S., Kyoung, M., Allen, J. J., Shokat, K. M., and Benkovic, S. J. (2010) Dynamic regulation of a metabolic multi-enzyme complex by protein kinase CK2, J. Biol. Chem. 285, 11093-11099.

6.

Ben-Sahra, I., Hoxhaj, G., Ricoult, S. J., Asara, J. M., and Manning, B. D. (2016) mTORC1 induces purine synthesis through control of the mitochondrial tetrahydrofolate cycle, Science 351, 728-733.

7.

French, J. B., Jones, S. A., Deng, H., Pedley, A. M., Kim, D., Chan, C. Y., Hu, H., Pugh, R. J., Zhao, H., Zhang, Y., Huang, T. J., Fang, Y., Zhuang, X., and Benkovic, S. J. (2016) Spatial colocalization and functional link of purinosomes with mitochondria, Science 351, 733-737.

8.

Verrier, F., An, S., Ferrie, A. M., Sun, H., Kyoung, M., Deng, H., Fang, Y., and Benkovic, S. J. (2011) GPCRs regulate the assembly of a multienzyme complex for purine biosynthesis, Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 909-915.

9.

Yamaoka, T., Yano, M., Kondo, M., Sasaki, H., Hino, S., Katashima, R., Moritani, M., and Itakura, M. (2001) Feedback inhibition of amidophosphoribosyltransferase regulates the rate of cell growth via purine nucleotide, DNA, and protein syntheses, J. Biol. Chem. 276, 21285-21291.


15


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

10.

Page 16 of 28

Hardie, D. G., Ross, F. A., and Hawley, S. A. (2012) AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 251-262.

11.

Corton, J. M., Gillespie, J. G., Hawley, S. A., and Hardie, D. G. (1995) 5aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside. A specific method for activating AMPactivated protein kinase in intact cells?, Eur. J. Biochem. 229, 558-565.

12.

Jin, X., Townley, R., and Shapiro, L. (2007) Structural insight into AMPK regulation: ADP comes into play, Structure 15, 1285-1295.

13.

Asby, D. J., Cuda, F., Beyaert, M., Houghton, F. D., Cagampang, F. R., and Tavassoli, A. (2015) AMPK Activation via Modulation of De Novo Purine Biosynthesis with an Inhibitor of ATIC Homodimerization, Chem. Biol. 22, 838-848.

14.

Mitchell-Ryan, S., Wang, Y., Raghavan, S., Ravindra, M. P., Hales, E., Orr, S., Cherian, C., Hou, Z., Matherly, L. H., and Gangjee, A. (2013) Discovery of 5-substituted pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine antifolates as dual-acting inhibitors of glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase and 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase in de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis: implications of inhibiting 5aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase to ampk activation and antitumor activity, J. Med. Chem. 56, 10016-10032.

15.

Racanelli, A. C., Rothbart, S. B., Heyer, C. L., and Moran, R. G. (2009) Therapeutics by cytotoxic metabolite accumulation: pemetrexed causes ZMP accumulation, AMPK activation, and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition, Cancer Res. 69, 5467-5474.

16.

Deng, Y., Gam, J., French, J. B., Zhao, H., An, S., and Benkovic, S. J. (2012) Mapping protein-protein proximity in the purinosome, J. Biol. Chem. 287, 36201-36207.

17.

ElAzzouny, M. A., Evans, C. R., Burant, C. F., and Kennedy, R. T. (2015) Metabolomics Analysis Reveals that AICAR Affects Glycerolipid, Ceramide and Nucleotide Synthesis Pathways in INS-1 Cells, PLoS One 10, e0129029.

18.

Tsou, P., Zheng, B., Hsu, C. H., Sasaki, A. T., and Cantley, L. C. (2011) A fluorescent reporter of AMPK activity and cellular energy stress, Cell Metab. 13, 476-486.

19.

Hawley, S. A., Ross, F. A., Chevtzoff, C., Green, K. A., Evans, A., Fogarty, S., Towler, M. C., Brown, L. J., Ogunbayo, O. A., Evans, A. M., and Hardie, D. G. (2010) Use of cells expressing gamma subunit variants to identify diverse mechanisms of AMPK activation, Cell Metab. 11, 554-565.


16

Page 17 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


20.

Xiao, B., Sanders, M. J., Carmena, D., Bright, N. J., Haire, L. F., Underwood, E., Patel, B. R., Heath, R. B., Walker, P. A., Hallen, S., Giordanetto, F., Martin, S. R., Carling, D., and Gamblin, S. J. (2013) Structural basis of AMPK regulation by small molecule activators, Nat. Commun. 4, 3017.

21.

Hailey, D. W., Rambold, A. S., Satpute-Krishnan, P., Mitra, K., Sougrat, R., Kim, P. K., and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (2010) Mitochondria supply membranes for autophagosome biogenesis during starvation, Cell 141, 656-667.

22.

Kabeya, Y., Mizushima, N., Ueno, T., Yamamoto, A., Kirisako, T., Noda, T., Kominami, E., Ohsumi, Y., and Yoshimori, T. (2000) LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing, EMBO J. 19, 57205728.

23.

Devore, J. L. (2012) Probability and Statistics for engineering and the sciences, 8th Ed ed., p 317, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.

24.

Geiger, T., Wehner, A., Schaab, C., Cox, J., and Mann, M. (2012) Comparative proteomic analysis of eleven common cell lines reveals ubiquitous but varying expression of most proteins, Mol. Cell Proteomics 11, M111 014050.

25.

Fu, L., Gao, Y. S., and Sztul, E. (2005) Transcriptional repression and cell death induced by nuclear aggregates of non-polyglutamine protein, Neurobiol. Dis. 20, 656-665.

26.

Garcia-Mata, R., Bebok, Z., Sorscher, E. J., and Sztul, E. S. (1999) Characterization and dynamics of aggresome formation by a cytosolic GFP-chimera, J. Cell Biol. 146, 12391254.

27.

Frere, J. M., Schroeder, D. D., and Buchanan, J. M. (1971) Biosynthesis of the purines. XXXV. Reversible polymerization of formylglycinamide ribonucleotide amidotransferase, J. Biol. Chem. 246, 4727-4730.

28.

Barry, R. M., and Gitai, Z. (2011) Self-assembling enzymes and the origins of the cytoskeleton, Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 14, 704-711.

29.

Ingerson-Mahar, M., Briegel, A., Werner, J. N., Jensen, G. J., and Gitai, Z. (2010) The metabolic enzyme CTP synthase forms cytoskeletal filaments, Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 739746.


17


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

30.

Page 18 of 28

Chang, C. C., Lin, W. C., Pai, L. M., Lee, H. S., Wu, S. C., Ding, S. T., Liu, J. L., and Sung, L. Y. (2015) Cytoophidium assembly reflects upregulation of IMPDH activity, J. Cell Sci. 128, 3550-3555.

31.

Narayanaswamy, R., Levy, M., Tsechansky, M., Stovall, G. M., O'Connell, J. D., Mirrielees, J., Ellington, A. D., and Marcotte, E. M. (2009) Widespread reorganization of metabolic enzymes into reversible assemblies upon nutrient starvation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 10147-10152.

32.

Noree, C., Sato, B. K., Broyer, R. M., and Wilhelm, J. E. (2010) Identification of novel filament-forming proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Drosophila melanogaster, J. Cell Biol. 190, 541-551.

33.

Petrovska, I., Nuske, E., Munder, M. C., Kulasegaran, G., Malinovska, L., Kroschwald, S., Richter, D., Fahmy, K., Gibson, K., Verbavatz, J. M., and Alberti, S. (2014) Filament formation by metabolic enzymes is a specific adaptation to an advanced state of cellular starvation, Elife, doi: 10.7554/eLife.02409.

34.

Suresh, H. G., da Silveira Dos Santos, A. X., Kukulski, W., Tyedmers, J., Riezman, H., Bukau, B., and Mogk, A. (2015) Prolonged starvation drives reversible sequestration of lipid biosynthetic enzymes and organelle reorganization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mol. Biol. Cell. 26, 1601-1615.

35.

Zhao, H., French, J. B., Fang, Y., and Benkovic, S. J. (2013) The purinosome, a multiprotein complex involved in the de novo biosynthesis of purines in humans, Chem. Commun. (Camb) 49, 4444-4452.

36.

Zacharias, D. A., Violin, J. D., Newton, A. C., and Tsien, R. Y. (2002) Partitioning of lipid-modified monomeric GFPs into membrane microdomains of live cells, Science 296, 913-916.

37.

Ott, R. L., and Longnecker, M. (2010) An introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis, 6th ed., pp 369-375, Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning, Belmont.

38.

Welch, B. L. (1947) The generalization of `Student's’ problem when several different population variances are involved, Biometrika 34, 28-35.

39.

Sprent, P., and Smeeton, N. C. (2007) Nonparametric Statistical Methods, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.


18

Page 19 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


40.

Allegra, C. J., Hoang, K., Yeh, G. C., Drake, J. C., and Baram, J. (1987) Evidence for direct inhibition of de novo purine synthesis in human MCF-7 breast cells as a principal mode of metabolic inhibition by methotrexate, J. Biol. Chem. 262, 13520-13526.


19


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 28

Figure Legends

Figure 1. Effect of AMPK activators on FGAMS-EGFP localization. Transiently expressed FGAMS-EGFP in HeLa cells formed clusters after addition of 150-300 µM AICAR (A and B), 170-430 µM metformin (C and D), 210-410 µM phenformin (E and F), and 100 µM A769662 (G and H) for 4 hr. However, transiently expressed HPRT1-EGFP did not form clusters when incubated with 250 µM AICAR (I and J) or 290 µM metformin (K and L) for 4 hr. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Figure 2. No impact on subcellular localization of other purine biosynthetic enzymes in the presence of AICAR. Transiently expressed PPAT-EGFP (A and B), TrifGART-GFP (C and D), PAICS-EGFP (E and F), ASL-EGFP (G and H), and EGFP-ATIC (I and J) in HeLa cells remained diffusive in the cytoplasm after incubation with 200 µM AICAR for 4 hr. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Figure 3. AMPK activation on HeLa cells co-expressing FGAMS-OFP and EGFP-ATIC. Treatment of AICAR (200 µM; A-F) or metformin (290 µM; G-L) on dually transfected HeLa cells promoted the clustering of FGAMS-OFP, but EGFP-ATIC remained diffusive. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Figure 4. Effect of AMPK knock-down on the AICAR-induced clustering efficiency of FGAMS-EGFP in HeLa cells. Dually transfected HeLa cells expressing shRNAAMPK or shRNAControl with FGAMS-EGFP were treated with 200µM AICAR for 4 hr. Clustering efficiencies (%) were calculated by dividing the number of cells showing AICAR-induced fluorescent clusters by the total number of cells counted for analysis. The error bars indicate the standard deviations of at least five independent experiments. * Statistical analysis using twosample t-test reveals p < 0.01, supporting the significant difference between the clustering efficiencies of FGAMS-EGFP in the presence of shRNAAMPK and shRNAControl.

Figure 5. Diffusion coefficients of FGAMS-EGFP involved in two different granules in HeLa cells. The graph is plotted the distribution of diffusion coefficients of FGAMS-EGFP involved in


20

Page 21 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


the AICAR-induced self-assemblies and the purinosomes in HeLa cells. Statistical analysis using Welch’s t-test, permutation test and Wilcoxon rank sum test, respectively, showed p < 0.0001, indicating significant difference between two diffusion coefficients.

Figure 6. HPLC analysis of purine metabolites in cell lysates. Normalized peak areas of purine metabolites of AMP, IMP, GMP and ATP from HeLa cells are shown before (grey) and after (black) 4-hr incubation with 200 µM AICAR. The error bars indicate the standard deviations of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis using one-sample t-test with one-tailed rejection region23 indicates p < 0.01 for GMP and ATP, p < 0.05 for AMP, and p = 0.06 for IMP. Alternatively, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates p = 0.0141. Note that HPLC chromatograms were corrected for background and the number of cells prior to the peak area integration. The resolved peaks were assigned by commercially available standards.


21


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 1 80x64mm (300 x 300 DPI)


Page 22 of 28

Page 23 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60





1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure 3 107x177mm (300 x 300 DPI)


Page 24 of 28

Page 25 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60





1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60



Page 26 of 28

Page 27 of 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


38x42mm (600 x 600 DPI)



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Graphical Table of Contents 80x37mm (300 x 300 DPI)


Page 28 of 28

Purine Biosynthesis by AMPK - ACS Publications - American

Recommend Documents