Reformatsky Reaction to Alkynyl N-tert-Butanesulfinyl Imines: Lewis

3 days ago - User Resources. About Us · ACS Members · Librarians · ACS Publishing Center · Website Demos · Privacy Policy · Mobile Site ...
0 downloads 0 Views 499KB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Sunderland

Note

Reformatsky Reaction to Alkynyl N-tert-Butanesulfinyl Imines: Lewis Acid Controlled Stereodivergent Synthesis of #-Alkynyl-#-Aminoacids Luis Fernández-Sánchez, Jose A. Fernandez-Salas, M. Carmen Maestro, and Jose Luis Garcia Ruano J. Org. Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01918 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Sep 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 17, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Reformatsky Reaction to Alkynyl N-tert-Butanesulfinyl Imines: Lewis Acid Controlled Stereodivergent Synthesis of β-Alkynyl-βAminoacids Luis Fernández-Sánchez, ‡ José A. Fernández-Salas, ‡* M. Carmen Maestro, ‡* Jose L. García Ruano ‡ ‡

Departamento de Química Orgánica (módulo-1), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049-Madrid, Spain KEYWORDS. Asymmetric synthesis, N-sulfinyl imines, β-aminoacids, Reformatsky reaction, stereodivergent

ABSTRACT: A highly diastereoselective Refortmatsky reaction to N-tert-butanesulfinyl propargylaldimines and ketimines is presented. The reaction proceeded with excellent yields and diastereoselectivities provided by the sulfinyl group in the presence of Me3Al. The use of TBSOTf as Lewis acid promoter switched the sense of the stereoinduction. Thus, this methodology allowed the stereodivergent asymmetric synthesis of β-alkynyl β-amino acid derivatives, from the same sulfinyl configuration by simply changing the Lewis acid promoter.

The development of efficient and practical strategies for the stereoselective construction of privileged structures is an ongoing objective and still holds a preferred position in organic chemistry research.1 β-Amino acids constitute a fundamental class of building-blocks for the synthesis of significant molecules with interesting pharmacological applications, showing hypoglycemic and antiketogenic properties as well as antibacterial and antifungal activities.2 Besides their intrinsic relevance, βamino acids are precursors for β-lactams, which are important building blocks present in a large number of antibiotics.3 On the other hand, the corresponding β-peptides display high tendency towards the formation of stable secondary structures of notable biological transcendence.4 Moreover, β-amino acids have been widely used in modern organic chemistry as chiral templates for asymmetric synthesis.2a Therefore, several groups have focused their attention on the development of efficient methods for the asymmetric synthesis of β-amino acids.2a,5 Addition to imines,5 including N-sulfinyl imines,6 of ester enolates or silyl ketene acetals4g,4i,4k,5f and Reformatsky-type reagents7 have been the approaches of choice to face this challenge. Although significant efforts have been devoted to synthesis of β-amino acids, a number of challenges in connection with its substrate generality still persist, being the synthesis of challenging γ,δ–alkynyl-β-amino acid deriva-

tives one of them. Propargyl β-amino acids are a special class of non-proteinogenic amino acids. In addition to potentially changing biological properties , these amino acids are key intermediates for interesting compounds with pharmacological activity, such as Xemilofiban, which has proven to be a platelet aggregation inhibitor that can prevent ischemia, heart attacks and other major adverse cardiac events.8 In this regard, asymmetric synthesis of propargylamines have been well established,9 featuring the alkynylation of imines as the preferred approach. Despite remarkable progress, the enolizable moiety makes the synthesis of related γ,δ-alkynyl-β-aminoacids10 inaccessible following this strategy. To circumvent this limitation, the use of alkynyl imines or their precursors11 as substrates in Mannich-type stereoselective reactions has emerged in the last decades.12 Snapper and Hoveyda described an efficient silver-catalyzed asymmetric Mannich reaction with chiral ligands of silyl ketene acetal, to N-ortho-methoxyphenyl alkynyl imine.12a However, the ortho-methoxyphenyl directing group is difficult to remove, requiring an oxidative procedure incompatible with many functional groups. The diastereoselective synthesis of β-alkynyl β-amino acids has also been addressed using a chiral auxiliary in either the imine ((S)phenylglycinol)12c or the nucleophile (chiral phenol derivative).12d Both methods only disclosed the reactivity of one

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

α,β-unsaturated imine and a multistep oxidative cleavage protocol for the amino acid deliverance is required. Recently, Maruoka and coworkers have followed a similar approach pursuing the synthesis of very challenging chiral α-tertiary amines by using alkynyl sulfinyl ketimines as platforms, though β-amino acids synthesis is not compatible with this methodology (A, Scheme 1).13 Taking all these precedents into consideration, the development of an efficient and general method for the asymmetric synthesis of β-alkynyl β-amino acid derivatives would be highly desirable. The great progress in the field of asymmetric synthesis over the past decades has allowed high control over the selectivity of a given reaction. However, access to the opposite diastereoisomer is not usually possible by using the same set of starting materials under similar reaction conditions. Thus, development of new methodologies that allow access to both stereoisomers by using the same configuration of the starting materials are highly desirable.5f,14 Herein, we describe a Reformatsky reaction to readily accessible N-sulfinyl alkynyl imines as chiral templates. Facile sulfinyl cleavage would lead to the synthesis of enantiopure β-alkynyl β-amino acid derivatives. This straightforward approach gives access to both stereoisomers of the desired γ,δ-alkynyl β-amino acids using the same configuration at the sulfur atom of the sulfinyl group. This stereodivergent approach relies on the use of different Lewis acids (B, Scheme 1), which efficiently switches the reactivity of the imine.

Scheme 1. Previous works (A), present work (B).

We began our studies investigating the Reformatsky reaction of the α-bromo ester derivative 2a and the alkynyl N-sulfinyl imine bearing a phenyl ring 1a as model substrate (Table 1). After optimizing the amount of Reformatsky reagent (2a) and the temperature (entries 16), the reaction showed a good efficiency when carried out at -10 oC in presence of 4 equivalents of the α-bromo ester (entry 6). At -40 oC the reaction did not take place and the starting imine was recovered (entry 7). Gratifyingly, in the presence of AlMe3 at -78 oC,15 the desired γ,δ– alkynyl-β-amino ester derivative 3a was obtained with complete diastereoselectivity (>98:2) in 88% isolated yield (entry 9).

Page 2 of 10

Table 1. Reformatsky reaction with alkynyl sulfinyl imines: Optimization.a

t Conv.b,c d.r.b 2a T o (%) (3a:3a’) (eq.) ( C) (h) 2.5 rt 1.25 100 (75) 87:13

Ent

L. Acids (eq.)

1

-

2d

-

2

0

15

-

-

3

-

2.5

0

4

90

-

4

-

3.5

0

20

100 (72)

90:10

5

-

3.5

-10

5

20

-

6

-

4

-10

5

100 (84)

91:9

7

-

4

-40

18

-

-

8

Cu(OTf)2 (1.1)

4

rt

22

-

-

9

AlMe3 (1.1)

4

-78

3

100 (88)

>98:2

10

BF3·OEt3 (2.1)

4

rt

22

100 (80)

86:14

11

TMSOTf (2.1)

4

-78

6

65 (62)

14:86

12

TBSOTf (2.1)

4

-78

6

100 (86)

7:93

a

All reactions were carried out with 1a (0.1 mmol) and Zn (0.4 mmol) in 0.25 mL of THF. b Determined by 1H-NMR. c Isolated yield of the major diastereoisomer in brackets. d Reaction carried out with 2 equiv. of Zn.

With the aim of developing a new stereodivergent procedure, which would allow us to synthesize both enantiomers of the corresponding alkynyl β-amino acid derivative starting from the same configuration at the sulfinyl group, we used a highly oxophilic Lewis acid which could potentially modify the transition state through which the reaction takes place. Consequently, when the reaction was performed in the presence of BF3·OEt2, compound with the S configuration (3a) was still obtained as major diastereoisomer (entry 10). TMSOTf reverses the selectivity of the reaction, leading to R-configured isomer with a reasonably high stereocontrol (entry 11). To our delight, when a more sterically hindered silyl derivative was used,

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

the diastereoselectivity was improved up to 93:7, since the facial discrimination increased as well (entry 12). After optimizing the reaction conditions, we studied the scope of the reaction regarding the synthesis of the S isomer. The results were summarized in Scheme 1. Firstly, different substitution in the aryl unit was considered. Arenes bearing an electron-rich (OMe) and an electrondeficient group (CO2Me) as well as a bromo group in both ortho and para position were well tolerated and the desired products were obtained with complete diastereoselectivity and from good to excellent yields (3b-3e). Aliphatic alkynyl imine 1f led to the β-amino ester product in high yield and only one diastereomer was observed (3f). Similarly, imine 1g, bearing a TMS-substituted alkyne, underwent efficient Reformatsky reaction to give versatile product 3g. Table 2. Highly diastereoselective Reformastky reaction to alkynyl N-sulfinyl imines: AlMe3.a

of such β-alkynyl β-tertiary amino acid derivatives has never been described. The absolute configuration of the asymmetric centers of 3g were unequivocally assigned as (Rs, S) by X-ray crystallographic analysis.16 We then studied the Reformatsky reaction to alkynyl N-sulfinyl imines mediated by TBSOTf in order to evaluate the scope of reaction (Table 3). Regarding the aldimines, these new reaction conditions tolerated electron-rich (OMe) and electron-deficient groups (CO2Me) as well as a bromo substituent in both ortho and para position of the phenyl group, leading to the desired βamino ester products in good yields and diastereoselectivities (3a’-e’). Imines bearing alkyl and TMS substituted alkynes underwent efficient Reformatsky reaction, to give adducts 3f’ and 3g’ in good yields and very good diastereoselectivities. No reaction was observed with methyl ketimine 1h. Table 3. Highly diastereoselective Reformastky reaction to alkynyl N-sulfinyl imines: TBSOTf.a

a

All reactions were carried out with 1 (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), Zn (0.4 mmol) and TBSOTf (0.21 mmol) in 0.25 mL of THF. The diastereomeric ratio was determined by 1H NMR. Isolated yields of the major diastereoisomer. a

All reactions were carried out with 1 (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), Zn (0.4 mmol) and AlMe3 (0.11 mmol) in 0.25 mL of THF. The diastereomeric ratio was determined by 1H NMR. Isolated yields.

In addition to sulfinyl aldimines, the corresponding less reactive and challenging ketimines proved to be suitable substrates in the Me3Al-promoted Reformatsky reaction. Thus, differently substituted aryl and alkyl terminus acetylene ketimines led to the desired β-amino ester with a α-tertiary amine moiety with complete diastereselectivity (3h-3k). It should be noted, that chiral α-tertiary amines are fundamental and recurrent motifs in naturally occurring and synthetic bioactive compounds and their synthesis still stands as an important challenge in organic chemistry.13a To the best of our knowledge, the synthesis

We propose that the Reformatsky reaction proceeded via a chair-like transition state17 where both the bulky tert-butyl ester group and the substituent in the sulfinyl imine could occupy equatorial positions. The reaction with aldimines (E isomer) and ketimines (Z isomer) takes place through a common transition state, although the E/Z isomeric distribution of the starting imine should be considered. Me3Al would be simply acting as Lewis acid, enhancing the reactivity of the imine.18 In this context, Me3Al could also be involve in differentiating the two Me3Al imine isomers reaction rates, which are in rapid equilibrium.13a,17a,19 Highly oxophilic Lewis acid (R3SiOTf) could potentially coordinate to the oxygen atom of the sulfinyl group, disengaging the six-membered chair-like

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

transition state. Thus, the reaction would take place under non-chelation control. The tert-butyl group of the sulfinyl group would direct the approach of the nucleophile to the less hindered re-face of the imine, leading to the opposite configuration (R) at the carbon atom that bears the amino group (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2. Proposed transition states for AlMe3- and R3SiOTf-mediated Reformatsky reactions

As mentioned above, apart from the high stereoinduction provided, the tert-butane sulfinyl group is an easily removable auxiliary (Scheme 3). Treatment of sulfinamides 3a and 3f with HCl in methanol allows the efficient deprotection to the amino ester (4a and 4f) in high yields without erosion in the enantiomeric purity, whereas deliverance of the optically pure β-alkynyl β-amino acid (5a and 5f) was efficiently accomplished in the presence of H2O.

Scheme 3. Sulfinyl group cleavage. Synthesis of β-alkynyl βamino esters and β-amino acids

In conclusion, we have described a highly diastereoselective Reformatsky reaction to enantiopure alkynyl Nsulfinylimines. The methodology tolerates a reasonably high range of aldimines and ketimines bearing differently substituted alkynyl groups. In addition, by simply changing the Lewis acid promoter, the reactivity switched, and allowed to prepare selectively both epimers from Nsulfinylimines with the same configuration at the sulfur atom. Finally, the sulfinyl group can be easily removed, leading to the desired enantiomerically pure β-alkynyl βamino acids. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION General considerations: All solvents were dried using activated 4Å molecular sieves and stored under nitrogen. 4Å molecular sieves, 1.6-2.5 mm of particle size, were activated by microwave (700W) (3 x 60 sec) and subsequent cycles of

Page 4 of 10

vacuum/nitrogen. For thin layer chromatography (TLC) silica gel plates with fluorescence indicator 254 nm were used and compounds were visualized by irradiation with UV light and/or by treatment with a solution of potassium permanganate in water followed by heating. Flash column chromatography was performed using silica gel (230−400 mesh) and compressed air. Hexane, ethyl acetate, dichloromethane and diethyl ether for flash chromatography were acquired from commercial sources and were used without previous purification. Optical rotation was recorded in cells with 10 cm path length; the specific solvents and concentrations (in g/100 mL) are indicated. NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker Avance 300 MHz spectrometer, running at 300, 75 and 282 MHz for 1 H, 13C and 19F respectively. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm relative to residual solvent signals (CDCl3, 7.26 ppm for 1H NMR and 77.2 ppm for 13C NMR respectively). 13C NMR spectra were acquired on a broad band decoupled mode. The following abbreviations are used to describe peak patterns when appropriate: s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), m (multiplet), bs (broad singlet). Mass spectra (MS) were obtained by ESI ionization mode. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were performed by ESI ionization mode using a time of-flight (TOF) mass analyzer, as indicated for each compound. Zn, dust;