Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO LIBRARIES
Policy Analysis
Resource Demand Scenarios for the Major Metals Ayman Elshkaki, Thomas E. Graedel, Luca Ciacci, and Barbara K. Reck Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05154 • Publication Date (Web): 30 Jan 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 7, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
1 2
Resource Demand Scenarios for the Major Metals
3 4
Ayman Elshkaki1, T. E. Graedel1*, Luca Ciacci1,2, Barbara K. Reck1
5 6 7
1
New Haven, CT 06511, USA
8 9 10
Center for Industrial Ecology, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University,
2
Department of Industrial Chemistry “Toso Montanari”, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna 40136, Italy
11 12 13
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-203-432 9733; Fax: +1-203-432 5556
14
E-mail address:
[email protected] 15
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4007-3189
16 17 18
Keywords: Scenario, aluminum, copper, iron, lead, manganese, nickel, zinc
19
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 2 of 26
20 21
Abstract
22 23
The growth in metal use in the past few decades raises concern that supplies may be insufficient
24
to meet demands in the future. From the perspective of historical and current use data for seven
25
major metals – iron, manganese, aluminum, copper, nickel, zinc, and lead – we have generated
26
several scenarios of potential metal demand from 2010-2050 under alternative patterns of global
27
development. We have also compared those demands with various assessments of potential
28
supply to mid-century. Five conclusions emerge: (1) The calculated demand for each of the
29
seven metals doubles or triples relative to 2010 levels by mid-century; (2) The largest demand
30
increases relate to a scenario in which increasingly equitable values and institutions prevail
31
throughout the world; (3) The metal recycling flows in the scenarios meet only a modest fraction
32
of future metals demand for the next few decades; (4) In the case of copper, zinc, and perhaps
33
lead, supply may be unlikely to meet demand by about mid-century under the current use
34
patterns of the respective metals; (5) Increased rates of demand for metals imply substantial new
35
energy provisioning, leading to increases in overall global energy demand of 21-37%. These
36
results imply that extensive technological transformations and governmental initiatives could be
37
needed over the next several decades in order that regional and global development and
38
associated metal demand are not to be constrained by limited metal supply.
39 40
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 26
41
Environmental Science & Technology
TOC Art
42
43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
64
Page 4 of 26
Introduction
65 66
Modern society is completely dependent on the use of metals, especially the “major metals”, to
67
enable transportation, housing, communication, and an almost infinite array of products and
68
services. Despite the fact that metals and the benefits of their properties are deeply embedded in
69
contemporary technology, detailed scenarios of metals based on historical supply and demand
70
and responsive to alternative patterns of regional and global development have not emerged. The
71
reason is relatively easy to understand by comparison with other resources. Energy, for example,
72
is fungible – it can be supplied by fossil fuels, by solar power, or by other means, and studies of
73
solar radiation and extractable oil and natural gas have a rich (if somewhat checkered) history. In
74
the case of water, one need only consider a single molecule, although one that has its own cycle.
75
Climate is quite challenging to address, but now has a history of several decades of effort by
76
meteorologists and Earth scientists. Metals availability and use, in contrast, is at least equally
77
complex, but is thus far relatively unexplored from a scenario perspective. It is easy to point to
78
some reasons for this. First, the inherent complexity of the topic is indicated by the routine
79
employment of more than sixty metals in modern technology1. Second, the potential for
80
substitution of one metal by another without degradation of function is quite limited2. Third, the
81
global resources of metals are not well quantified3-5. Nonetheless, the consideration of possible
82
futures of metals is every bit as important as those of energy, water, or climate.
83 84
To date, very few scenarios relate to future metal supply, demand, and environmental
85
implications, and those that do so have not been based on individual metals, current and
86
anticipated metal use in different principal applications, nor geological data limitations. Van
87
Vuuren et al. (1999) addressed two metal groups: “AbAlloy” (Fe, Al, Cr, Ti) and “MedAlloy” 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
88
(Cu, Pb, Zn, Sn, Ni), with climate implications rather than individual metal supply and demand
89
as the central issue. That focus was also taken by the International Energy Agency (2011), which
90
based its scenarios on historic data on greenhouse gas emissions from metal production, making
91
no distinctions between metals and their various use histories and prospects. Allwood et al.
92
(2010) assigned specific 2050 demands for iron and aluminum and explored various backcasting
93
approaches to minimizing greenhouse gas production. In none of these efforts was a variety of
94
metals addressed, nor were their individual industrial sector behaviors explored.
95 96
In the present work, we draw on materials science, industrial sector analysis, and economic
97
geology information to explicitly address plausible futures for metal supply and demand.
98
Although almost all metals have unique uses, the “major metals”, which we define as iron (Fe),
99
aluminum (Al), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), and nickel (Ni), are those
100
that are employed most widely and in the largest quantities: the annual production of these
101
metals constitutes more than 98% by mass of all the industrial metals combined6. The balance
102
between supply and demand of these metals, now and in the future, is thus of both significant
103
interest and substantial importance. In general, each of these metals has a small number of
104
principal uses in which the bulk of its production is employed. These use histories are well
105
known for the past few decades, providing information that can serve as a starting point for
106
considerations of future demand.
107 108
To explore possibilities in the next few decades from the perspective of the past, we have
109
developed a set of scenarios directed toward metal demand to mid-century. Scenarios, which
110
originated in military and business circles in the 1970s and 1980s e.g., 7, 8, have been used in
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 6 of 26
111
recent years to explore the possible futures of resource supply, resource demand, and
112
environmental implications. Examples include energy9, water10, and climate11. The purpose of
113
such scenarios is not to predict the future, which they cannot do, but to stimulate thought and
114
enable decision-makers to plan possible actions related to eventualities that might occur. Our
115
scenarios, which we term the Yale Major Metal (YMM) scenarios, are built upon the foundations
116
and perspectives of those for climate and energy9, 12, 13, and can be described briefly as follows
117
(and in more detail in the Supporting Information): The Market World scenario essentially posits
118
that those in the developing world (whose per capita income is expected to increase) will wish to
119
acquire possessions similar to those typical of people in the more developed world , and that
120
market forces will enable that to happen. The Toward Resilience scenario is similar except that
121
government policies more respectful of renewable energy and the environment will be in force.
122
The Security Foremost scenario tilts toward confrontation and isolationism rather than
123
cooperation, with a consequent reduction in international commerce. Finally, the Equitability
124
World scenario aims toward a more collaborative and inclusive world in which at least minimal
125
material needs are provided to all. Whatever world awaits us, whether one of these or some
126
other, it will need to be realized by the extensive use of the metals that we address in these
127
studies.
128 129
Materials and Methods
130 131
It is useful in developing scenarios for the future magnitude of any variable to refer to the
132
situation in the recent past. This approach is likely to be reasonably accurate for the major
133
metals, at least for the foreseeable future, because most variables related to global processes and
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
134
global material flows change slowly and because effective substitution requires large quantities
135
of a suitable substitute. For the seven metals in this study we first identify their principal uses
136
and the historical fractions of those uses. The total historic demand for the metals is then
137
disaggregated based on use in different final product sectors, including buildings and
138
infrastructure, transportation, industrial machinery, appliances, electronics, metal goods, and
139
chemicals (Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). The analysis for the metals is carried out
140
from 1980 to 2010 on a global level, with the exception of manganese, for which available data
141
were for 1980 to 2008.
142 143
The starting point for deriving future metal demand in the four scenarios is the global production
144
of the seven metals in 2010. Metal demand then evolves on the basis of adopted annual
145
percentages of growth. Growth rates are strongly connected to GDP/capita, given the evidence
146
for high correlations between growth and individual wealth14-15. Projections for population and
147
per capita income were based on research by Electris et al.13, the World Bank16, and the United
148
Nations Population Division17-18. Where we have deemed appropriate, adjustments were made to
149
growth rates in order to reflect anticipated increases in level of urbanization and the associated
150
metal demands for housing and infrastructure19,20, substitution of materials2, and technological
151
development
152
that were utilized. The resulting percentages of growth that were employed for the seven metals
153
over the time periods of 2010-2015 and 2025-2050 are given in Table S10. The energy supply
154
and energy mix for the scenarios are derived from the International Energy Agency23 and are
155
described in Section 3 of the Supporting Information.
cf. 21,22
. Table S3 in the Supporting Information provides the derived coefficients
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 8 of 26
156
In an actual situation in the future, metal prices and thus metal demands would be expected to
157
respond to price fluctuations. Because price has never been determined to reflect geological
158
scarcity, however24, there appears to be no obvious approach to incorporating market dynamics
159
in scenarios aimed several decades into the future. Our judgement is that the general thrust of our
160
policy-related metal demand results would hold over time even in a market dynamics model,
161
given the large flows into use of these metals and the general lack of suitable alternative
162
materials for the principal metal uses in the next few decades. We choose, therefore, not to
163
arbitrarily inject economic disruptions into our scenarios.
164
Results and Discussion
165 166
We have used the approach outlined above to study metal demand and supply for the seven
167
metals, from 2010 to mid-century, under the drivers and constraints incorporated into the four
168
scenarios. As an example of the results, Figure 1(upper left) shows the derived demand for iron.
169
The four scenarios all show substantial increases in iron demand over time compared with the
170
2010 value of about 1400 Tg Fe (million metric tons of Fe). The lowest final demand, for the
171
Security Foremost scenario, is about 3250 Tg Fe in 2050. The Market World and Toward
172
Resilience results are similar to each other at about 4200 Tg Fe in 2050. The Equitability World
173
scenario generates the highest iron demand at about 5150 Tg Fe, or more than triple the demand
174
of four decades earlier.
175 176
Our metal demand results are consistent with those of other researchers, who have generally
177
applied one-metal and often one-scenario approaches. Nonetheless, iron demand by mid-century
178
in those studies is anticipated to double or triple5,25-26, aluminum demand to increase by three to
179
eight times5,27-28, and demand for other widely used metals by two to three times5. These findings 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
180
indicate that the metal demand results presented in this paper would not be deemed unrealistic by
181
other researchers.
182 183
Because iron is by far the most widely used metal, we would not necessarily expect that scenario
184
features for the other metals would resemble those for iron. As it turns out, however, the iron
185
results are qualitatively duplicated for the other six metals, as shown in Figure 1(right), and in
186
additional detail elsewhere for copper29 and nickel30. This occurs despite the fact that we treat
187
each metal individually by addressing its principal uses and the evolution of those uses over
188
time. In all cases the calculated total individual metal demand by 2050 is some two to four times
189
that of 2010, and for the metals the order of the metal demand growth in the scenarios, high to
190
low, is the same. This is largely a consequence of the scenario factors that drive the demand for
191
the metals, especially the increasing global population and the anticipated rise in global per
192
capita wealth.
193 194
Features of the results for the different development scenarios are also worth comment. As
195
mentioned above, they are intended to explore quite different pictures of possible global
196
development and thus of resource requirements. The four scenarios do indeed give quite different
197
results, and it is of particular interest that the largest demands for metals emerge not from the
198
Market World vision but from that of the Equitability World (Figure 1(right)). This is largely due
199
to the growing urban populations in the developing country regions and to their increasing per
200
capita incomes in the Equitability World scenario. Thus, from a resource perspective a more
201
equitable future for the planet’s population implies a large increase in demand for the major
202
metals.
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 10 of 26
203 204
It is important to ask whether the metal demands of Figure 1(right) could be met by recycling. To
205
respond to this question, in Figure 1(c) we compare the calculated demand for zinc as determined
206
by historical demands, the life times of the major uses of the metals e.g., 31-32, the dissipative use
207
of metals33, and recycling rates and efficiencies34 with the anticipated secondary (recycled)
208
supply computed in the present work (Figure S11 in the SI). It is apparent that in a growing
209
global economy that encompasses relatively high dissipation rates and long product life times,
210
the supply likely to be available from recycling will be only a modest fraction (~15%) of that
211
needed to meet demand. Zinc is merely a representative metal here; the derived secondary
212
supplies of the other metals follow similar patterns with the exception of lead, in which a high
213
fraction of its demand is met by secondary sources due to the relatively high recycling rate, low
214
dissipative use, and short life time of its major end use application (batteries).
215 216
If demand is unlikely to be met by recycling, what are the prospects for increased supply from
217
primary resources? This issue can be addressed through the use of two geological measures: the
218
“Reserves” (R, amounts in deposits that are currently economic to mine, a quantity that can be
219
estimated reasonably accurately) and the “Resources to Mid-Century” (RMC, the roughly
220
estimated global resource production potential to 2050). (Our sources for numerical values of
221
these metrics are discussed in the Supporting Information.) Figure 2 illustrates the cumulative
222
demand (2010-2050) calculated for each of the seven metals over the four developmental
223
scenarios, expressed as wedges of the ranges of demand, highest to lowest. The gray region is
224
centered on 100% of the approximate RMC for the metals. For four of the metals, nickel, iron,
225
aluminum, and manganese, none of the scenario results exceed the estimated Resources to Mid-
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
226
Century values by 2050, suggesting that there are no immediate supply concerns provided that
227
there is adequate capacity to mine and process the currently identified ore bodies. This is not the
228
case, however, with zinc, which can be seen to exceed the Resources to Mid-Century value in
229
about 2034-2037, depending on the scenario, and for copper, which is calculated to exceed
230
Resources to Mid-Century in about 2044-2048. A similar result occurs for lead, with Resources
231
to Mid-Century exceeded in about 2041. However, the lead scenario is based to a significant
232
degree on historic uses of lead batteries in motor vehicles. To the degree that electric vehicles
233
displace internal combustion vehicles in the global market, the demand for lead that we derive
234
may be overestimated.
235 236
In fact, the anticipated supply situation may be even more problematic than suggested by Figure
237
2, at least in the case of copper. Northey and colleagues35 have conducted a survey of global
238
copper resources, historic mine production, and anticipated mine production, based on a
239
combination of published data, information in corporate and public reports, and news releases.
240
They use that information to predict copper production to 2100, and find a peak around 2030-
241
2040 that declines just as demand from our scenario results increases (Figure 3). Copper
242
recycling results from the scenarios can be seen from Figure 3 to ameliorate the challenge to
243
primary copper supply to some degree, but not to significantly mitigate primary copper demand.
244
Taken together, Figures 2 and 3 imply potentially significant limitations on copper supply in two
245
or three decades.
246 247 248 249 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 12 of 26
250
Similar studies for anticipated geological production have not yet been carried out for zinc, lead,
251
nickel, aluminum, or manganese, but Mohr and colleagues36 have done so for iron. They find an
252
iron production peak around mid-century, at about 75% more than 2010 production (inadequate
253
to support the demand results illustrated in Figure 1(right)). Thus, the degree to which supply of
254
metals can meet demand over the next few decades will depend not only on the amount of global
255
resources but also on the degree to which available production capacity is available to expand
256
appropriately.
257 258 259
Increased rates of demand for metals imply substantial new energy provisioning, leading to
260
increases in overall global energy demand of 21-37%, as shown in Figure 4. In line with metal
261
demand, Equitability World has the highest energy use, and Security Foremost (with lowest
262
metal demand) the lowest. (A detailed breakdown by metal in provided in Section 13 of the
263
Supporting Information.) In a world in which concern about climate change is high, these
264
potential increases in energy demand deserve careful consideration. Increased metal production
265
will also require large amounts of water, but the relevant water requirements data are poorly
266
quantified and thus water needs as a consequence of metal production are not part of the present
267
scenario study.
268 269
Given the enhanced metal demand results of the scenarios, we consider four actions that might
270
be invoked in efforts to balance demand and supply: (1) achieving per capita saturation of metal
271
demand; (2) substituting abundant materials for scarce metals, (3) enhancing recycling, and (4)
272
maximizing primary production yields. Per capita saturation might be imagined to occur once
12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
273
one’s needs and desires as reflected in metal use have been satisfied. While not unreasonable as a
274
concept, it turns out that, for the seven metals which our scenarios address, only for iron in
275
France, the United Kingdom, and the United States have well-characterized examples of in-use
276
stock saturation been shown to occur37. A study of less well-characterized stock buildup38
277
suggests that an eventual iron saturation range for world regions is about 12.8-15.4 Mg Fe/capita.
278
Merely this lower bound would imply an eventual global in-use stock of at least 120 Pg Fe (12.8
279
Mg Fe/capita * 9.3 billion people), assuming that no major technological transformation occurs.
280
Such a level would be well above the cumulative production predictions of Mohr and
281
colleagues36.
282 283
Although substitution for a metal in short supply would not seem at first glance to be an
284
unrealistic goal, it nonetheless appears that no suitable substitutes are available for most of the
285
seven metals’s major uses2. In cases where possible substitutes can be identified, the next
286
consideration is whether the substitutes could be available in the quantities that would be
287
required. We investigate this issue in Section 15 of the Supporting Information, where we show
288
that the primary uses of all seven major metals relate strongly to buildings and infrastructure.
289
These are sectors of use that appear quite difficult to quickly replace by alternative materials,
290
especially at the magnitudes that would be required and particularly in the next two or three
291
decades (see Table S12 in the Supporting Information). Overall, therefore, while material
292
substitutions here and there wil be helpful, no substitutes appear sufficiently abundant to replace
293
the total demand of any of the major metals even if their physical and chemical properties were
294
found to be satisfactory.
295
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 14 of 26
296
Could enhanced recycling rates meet the demand challenge? Some of the demands posited by the
297
scenario results could surely be satisfied by recycling metal that is leaving use. However,
298
although recycling rates can surely be improved, it seems unlikely that recycling could be
299
sufficient to largely or completely satisfy demand, at least for many decades to come.
300 301
So far as the topic of primary production yields is concerned, process inefficiencies are known to
302
occur throughout elemental cycles, especially at early life cycle stages. Ore grades and the
303
technologies used for metal extraction influence mining efficiency, and additional losses occur
304
during subsequent processing (e.g., slags). For the seven metals, losses in primary production are
305
listed in Table S6. The residues from mining activities (commonly known as “tailings”) may
306
contain varying amounts of metals whose extraction is not economically feasible because of low
307
concentrations. However, the depletion of primary deposits and the decline of ore grades39 are
308
stimulating efforts towards optimal material extraction40. In particular, tailings could become a
309
valuable source of primary material, and novel extraction practices (such as phytoextraction 41-43
310
could help to exploit the potential for material recovery.
311 312
As has been pointed out e.g., 44, the metal supply from Reserves largely reflects current demand,
313
while potential supply from Resources to Mid-Century may be underestimated because
314
Resources to Mid-Century is quite difficult to determine5. It is important to note, however, that
315
key factors in metal primary supply include not only the magnitude and quality of the resource
316
but also the rate and efficiency with which the target minerals can be extracted and processed. It
317
is the combination of estimated quantity in ore deposits and potential rates of production that has
318
been evaluated by Northey and colleagues35 for copper and by Mohr and colleagues36 for iron,
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
319
and on which their estimates of peak extraction by mid-century are based. Because we cannot
320
know with any certainty what future metal demands will be44, a high level of precision should
321
not be implied for the results reported in this paper.
322 323
It is also appropriate to reconize that supplies of these (and other) metals are potentially
324
constrained by factors other than geological abundance and inadequate recycling. The energy
325
and water requirements for mining and processing of ores, especially lower grade ores, are large
326
and increasing5,45 . Other challenges include achieving and maintaining a social licence to
327
operate mines in populated regions5,46, something becoming increasingly contentious in a world
328
of social media interactions, as well as geopolitical instability in some mineral-rich countries47.
329
Possible policy responses to evolving mineral supply and demand issues are discussed
330
elsewhere44,47.
331 332
In summary, we have conducted what we believe to be the first well-characterized scenario
333
studies for the demand and supply of seven major metals, from the present day to mid-century. It
334
is not appropriate to ask if the scenarios are "correct". Rather, the fundamental requirement for
335
scenarios is that they describe plausible ways in which global societal/material evolution might
336
occur. As such, the results of these scenarios provide the basis for considering the potential
337
consequences should the results turn out to approximate actual situations seen to occur over time.
338
Our results suggest that significant supply challenges for the major metals may lie ahead. If
339
adequate supplies of these metals cannot be made available over time and at affordable prices, it
340
may be quite difficult to extend to emerging economies the core technologies upon which the
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 16 of 26
341
more developed world has depended for housing, transportation, energy provisioning, and other
342
modern needs. The result could be a quite significant constraint to global development.
343
344
Supporting Information.
345
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at
346
1. The Yale Major Metal (YMM) scenarios and their storylines
347
2. Historical metals use in different industrial sectors
348
3. Analysis of the historical demand for metals
349
4. Fitting the historical rate of use results to metals industrial applications
350
5. Geological resource metrics
351
6. Ore grade specifications
352
7. Losses in primary production
353
8. Dissipative losses of the metals
354
9. Recycling rate/recycled content values
355
10. Required metal production increases required to meet demand in the four scenarios
356
11. Relative metal demand results in the four scenarios
357
12. Metal demand by use results in the four scenarios
358
13. Energy required to meet metal demand
359
14. Primary metal supply compared to the Reserves and Resources to Mid-Century
360
15. The potential for substitution
361
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
362
References
363
1. Greenfield, A.; Graedel, T.E. The omnivorous diet of modern technology. Resour. Conserv.
364
Recy. 2013, 74, 1-7.
365
2. Graedel, T.E., Harper. E.M., Nassar. N.T., Reck, B.K. On the materials basis of modern
366
society. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2015, 112, 6295-6300.
367
3. Poulton, M.M.; Jagers, S.C.; Linde, S., Van Zyl, D., Danielson, L.J., Matti, S. State of the
368
world’s nonfuel mineral resources: Supply, demand, and socio-institutional fundamentals. Ann.
369
Rev. Environ. Resour., 2013, 38, 345-371.
370
4. Mudd, G.M., Jowitt, S.M., Werner, T.T. The world’s by-product and critical metal resources.
371
Part I: Uncertainties, current reporting practices, implications and grounds for optimism. Ore
372
Geol. Rev., 2017, 88, 924-938; DOI 10.1016/j.oregeolrev.2016.05.001.
373
5. Christmann, P. Towards a more equitable use of mineral resources. Nat. Res. Res. 2017; DOI
374
10.1007/s11053-017-9343-6.
375
6. Mineral Commodity Summaries. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 2017.
376
7. Wack, P. Scenarios: Uncharted waters ahead. Harvard Bus. Rev.1985, 73 (5),72-89.
377
8. Herman, M., Frost, M., Kurz, R. Wargaming for Leaders, McGraw Hill, New York, 2009.
378
9. World Energy Outlook, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2014.
379
10. McDonald, R.I.; Green, P.; Balk, D.; Fekete, B.M.; Revenga, C.; Todd, M.; Montgomery, M.
380
Urban growth, climate change, and freshwater availability. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2011,
381
108, 6312-6317. 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 18 of 26
382
11. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
383
Change, Bern, Switzerland, 2014.
384
12. Global Environmental Outlook 4: Environment for Development, UNEP (2007) (United
385
Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi).
386
13. The Century Ahead: Four Global Scenarios, Technical Documentation. Electris, C.; Raskin,
387
P.; Rosen, R.; Stutz, J. Tellus Institute, Boston, 2009.
388
14. Lenzen, M.; Malik, A.; Foran, B. Reply to Schandl et al., 2016, JCLEPRO and Hatfield-
389
Dodds et al., 2015, Nature: How challenging is decoupling for Australia? J. Clean. Prod. 2016,
390
139, 796-798.
391
15. Roberts, M.C. Metal use and the world economy. Resour. Pol. 1996, 22,183-196.
392
16. World Bank Indicators; World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2015; http://www.worldbank.org
393 394
17. Lutz, W.; Butz, W.P.; Samir, K.C., Eds. World Population and Human Capital in the 21st
395
Century, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2014.
396 397
18. World Urbanization Prospects, United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs,
398
Washington, D.C., 2015; http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/index.html.
399 400
19. Schiller, G. Urban infrastructure: Challenges for resource efficiency in the building stock,
401
Build. Res. & Info., 2007, 35, 399-411.
402
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
403
20. Pauliuk, S.; Venkatesh, G., Brattebø, H., Müller, D.B. Employing urban mines: Pipe length
404
and material stocks in urban water and wastewater networks, Urban Water J. 2014, 11, 274-283.
405 406
21. Sessolo, M.; Bolink, H.J. Perovskite solar cells join the major league, Science, 2015, 350,
407
917.
408 409
22. Sprecher, B.; Reemeyer, L.; Alonso, E.; Kuipers, K.; Graedel, T.E. How “black swan”
410
disruptions impact minor metals Resour. Pol., 2017, 54, 88-96.
411
23. International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook, Paris, 2012.
412 413
24. Henckens, M.L.C.M.; van Ierland, E.C.; Driessen, P.P.J.; Worrell, E. Mineral resources:
414
Geological scarcity, market price trends, and future generations, Resour. Pol. 2016, 49, 102-111.
415 416
25. Allwood, J.M.; Cullen, J.M.; Milford, R.M. Options for achieving a 50% cut in industrial
417
carbon emissions by 2050. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1888-1894.
418
26. Hatayama, H.; Daigo, I.; Matsuno, Y.; Adachi, Y. Outlook of the world steel cycle based on
419
the stock and flow dynamics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 6457-6463.
420
27. Liu, G.; Bangs, C.E.; Müller, D.B. Stock dynamics and emission pathways of the global
421
aluminium cycle. Nat. Clim. Change 2013, 3, 338-342.
422
28. Cullen, J.M.; Allwood, J.M. Mapping the global flow of aluminium: From liquid aluminium
423
to end-use goods, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 3057-3064.
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 20 of 26
424
29. Elshkaki, A.; Graedel, T.E.; Ciacci, L.; Reck, B.K. Copper demand, supply, and associated
425
energy use to 2050. Glob. Environ. Change, 2016, 39, 305-315.
426
30. Elshkaki, A.; Reck, B.K.; Graedel, T.E. Anthropogenic nickel supply, demand, and
427
associated energy and water use, Res., Conserv., Recyc.,2017, 125, 300-307.
428
31. Meylan, G.; Reck, B.K. The anthropogenic cycle of zinc: Status quo and perspectives, Res.,
429
Conserv., Recyc.,2017, 123, 1-10.
430
32. Daigo, I.; Hashimoto, S.; Murakami, S.; Oguchi, M.; Tasaki, T. Lifespan Database for
431
Vehicles, Equipment, and Structures: LiVES, www.nies.go.jp/lifespan, 2010.
432
33. Ciacci, L.; Reck, B.K.; Nassar, N.T.; Graedel, T.E. (2015) Lost by design, Environ. Sci.
433
Technol. 2015, 49,9443-9451.
434
34. Recycling Rates of Metals: A Status Report; International Resource Panel, Paris, 2011.
435
35. Northey, S.; Mohr, S.; Mudd, G.M.; Weng, Z.; Giurco, D. Modelling future copper ore grade
436
decline based on a detailed assessment of copper resources and mining. Res. Conserv.,
437
Recyc.2014, 83,190-201.
438
36. Mohr, S.; Giurco, D.; Yellishetty, M.; Ward, J.; Mudd, G. Projection of iron ore production,
439
Nat. Resour. Res., 2015, 24, 317-327.
440
37. Müller, D.B.; Wang, T.; Duval, B. Patterns of iron use in societal evolution. Environ. Sci.
441
Technol., 2011, 45,182-188.
442
38. Pauliuk, S.; Milford, R.L.; Müller, D.B.; Allwood, J.M. The steel scrap age. Environ. Sci.
443
Technol., 2013, 47, 3448-3454.
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
444
39. Vieira, M.D.H.; Goedkoop, M.J.; Storm, P.; Huijbregts, M.A.J. Ore grade decrease as life
445
cycle impact indicator for metal scarcity: The case of copper. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2012, 46,
446
12772-12778.
447
40. Ali, S.H.; Giurco, D.; Arndt, N.; Nickless, E.; Brown, G.; Demetriades, A.; Durrheim, R.;
448
Enriquez, M.A.; Kinnaird, J.; Littleboy, A.; Meinert, L.D.; Oberhänsli, R.; Salem, J.; Schodde,
449
R.; Schneider, G.; Vidal, O.; Yakovleva, N. Mineral supply for sustainable development requires
450
resource governance, Nature, 2017, 543, 367-372.
451
41. Hunt, A.J.; Anderson, C.W.N.; Bruce, N.; Garcia, A.M.; Graedel, T.E.; Hodson, M.; Meech,
452
J.A.; Nassar, N.T.; Parker, H.L.; Rylott, E.L.; Sotiriou, K.; Zhang, Q.; Clark, J.H.
453
Phytoextraction as a tool for green chemistry. Green Proc. Synth., 2014, 3, 3-22.
454
42. van der Ent, A; Baker, A.J.M.; Reeves, R.D.; Chaney, R.L.; Anderson, C.W.N.; Meech, J.A.;
455
Esskine, P.D.; Simonnot, M.-O.; Vaughn, J.; Morel, J.L.; Echevarria, G.; Fogliani, B.;
456
Rongliang, Q.; Mulligan, D.R. Agromining: Farming for metals in the future? Environ. Sci.
457
Technol., 2015, 49, 4773-4780.
458
43. Harumain, Z.A.S.; Parker, H.L.; Garcia, A.M.; Austin, M.J.; McElroy, C.R.; Hunt, A.J.;
459
Clark, J.H.; Meech, J.A.; Anderson, C.W.N.; Ciacci, L.; Graedel, T.E.; Bruce, N.C.; Rylott, E.L.
460
(2017) Towards financially viable phytoextraction and production of plant-based palladium
461
catalysts. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2017, 51, 2992-3000, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04821.
462
44. Meinert, L.D.; Robinson, G.R.; Nassar, N.T. Mineral resources: Reserves, peak production,
463
and the future. Resources, 2016, 5, 14; doi: 10.3390/resources5010014.
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 22 of 26
464
45. Mudd, G.M. The environmental sustainability of mining in Australia: key mega-trends and
465
looming constraints, Resour. Pol., 2010. 35, 98-115.
466
46. Moffat, K.: Zhang, A. The paths to social license to operate: An integrative model explaining
467
community acceptance of mining. Resour. Pol., 2014. 39, 61-70.
468
469
470
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
471
We thank the Nickel Institute, BP International, General Electric Global Research Center, Shell
472
Global Solutions, the United Nations Environment Programme, and the U.S. National Science
473
Foundation (Grant CBET-1336121) for useful comments and for financial support, T. Fishman
474
for helpful comments on data analysis, and S. Mohr, G.M. Mudd, and S. Northey for sharing
475
data from their work.
476
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
477 478 479
Figure 1. Global metal demand for the four alternative development scenarios. Upper left: Iron
480
demand, 1980-2010 (historic), 2010-2050 (scenarios). Right: Relative demand for the seven
481
major metals in the four scenarios as indicated by the color ramp below the figure, in which “1”
482
indicates the 2010 demand. Lower left: Comparing demands (P) for zinc under the four scenarios
483
with the anticipated secondary supplies (S) (i.e., from recycling) derived from the scenarios.
484
Scenario abbreviations are: MW = Market World, TR = Toward Resilience, SF = Security
485
Foremost, EW = Equitability World.
486
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 24 of 26
487 488 489 490 491 492 493
Figure 2. Cumulative global primary demand for the seven metals from 2010-2050, compared to Resources to Mid-Century (RMC), the very roughly estimated potential global resources production to 2050. The calculated demand for all four scenarios for a given metal are contained within its colored wedge. The gray region indicates the uncertainty of the RMC estimates for the metals.
494
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 26
Environmental Science & Technology
80 80,000 EW
teragrams copper per year
70 70,000 TR MW
60 60,000
Total Demand
EW
50 50,000
SF TR MW
40 40,000
Total Supply
SF EW
30 30,000
TR MW
20 20,000
Primary Supply
Secondary Supply
SF
10 10,000 00 1960
495
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2060
2070
P
MW (S)
TR (S)
SF (S)
EW (S)
MW (T)
SF (T)
EW (T)
MW (TS)
TR (TS)
SF (TS)
EW (TS)
2080
2090
2100
TR (T)
496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504
Figure 3. Year-by-year total copper demand from the four alternative development scenarios (red curves) (T), compared with the primary copper production supply predictions of Northey et al.35 (solid black line) (P) plus the anticipated secondary copper supply derived from the scenarios (light blue curves) (S). The total copper supplies (TS, dark blue lines) are the sums of the Northey et al. primary production values (P) and the secondary production values calculated in this work (S).
505
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 26 of 26
506
507 508 509
Figure 4. Cumulative energy demand for metals [EJ/yr] in the four scenarios.
510 511 512
26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment