Rhubarb Supplementation Promotes Intestinal Mucosal Innate

Jan 11, 2018 - supplementation of rhubarb could enhance host mucosal innate immune homeostasis by modulating intestinal epithelial microbiota during t...
1 downloads 12 Views 4MB Size
Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

Article

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

Rhubarb supplementation promotes intestinal mucosal Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

innate immune homeostasis

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

through modulating intestinal epithelial microbiota in goat kids Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

Jinzhen Jiao, Jian Wu, Min Wang, Chuanshe Zhou, Rong-Zhen Zhong, and Zhi-Liang Tan

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05297 • Publication Date (Web): 11 Jan 2018

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 14, 2018

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

Just Accepted

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

“Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accept online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and autho

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the res dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after accep

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Jus fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Acc to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not includ

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatte Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that te

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affec

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS can or consequences arising from the use of information contained in t

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any

Page 1 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Running title: rhubarb intervention in young goats

2 3

Rhubarb supplementation promotes intestinal mucosal innate immune homeostasis through

4

modulating intestinal epithelial microbiota in goat kids

5

Jinzhen Jiao†,‡, Jian Wu†,§, Min Wang†, ‡, Chuanshe Zhou†,‡ , Rongzhen Zhong#

6

and Zhiliang Tan†,‡,*

7 8



Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of

9

Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Engineering Laboratory

10

for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production; Hunan

11

Provincial Engineering Research Center for Healthy Livestock and Poultry Production;

12

Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in

13

South-Central, Ministry of Agriculture, Changsha, Hunan 410125, P. R. China.

14 15



Hunan Co-Innovation Center of Animal Production Safety, CICAPS, Changsha, Hunan

410128, P. R. China.

16

§

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

17

#

Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,

18 19

Changchun, Jilin 130102, P. R. China. *

Corresponding author. Address: Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, the Chinese

20

Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, P.R. China; Email: [email protected]; Tel:

21

+8673184619702; Fax: +8673184612685.

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 32

Page 3 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

22

ABSTRACT

23

The abuse and misuse of antibiotics in livestock production pose a potential health risk

24

globally. Rhubarb can serve as a potential alternative to antibiotics, and several studies have

25

looked into its anti-cancer, anti-tumor and anti-inflammatory properties. The aim of this study

26

was to test the effects of rhubarb supplementation to the diet of young ruminants on innate

27

immune function and epithelial microbiota in the small intestine. Goat kids were fed with a

28

control diet supplemented with or without rhubarb (1.25% DM), and were slaughtered at d 50

29

and 60 of age. Results showed that the supplementation of rhubarb increased ileal villus

30

height (P = 0.036), increased jejujal and ileal anti-inflammatory IL-10 production (P < 0.05),

31

increased jejunal and ileal Claudin-1 expression at both mRNA and protein levels (P < 0.05),

32

and decreased ileal pro-inflammatory IL-1β production (P < 0.05). These changes in innate

33

immune function were accompanied by shifts in ileal epithelial bacterial ecosystem in favor

34

of Blautia, Clostridium, Lactobacillus and Pseudomonas, and with a decline in the relative

35

abundance of Staphylococcus (P < 0.001) when rhubarb was supplemented. Additionally, age

36

also affected (P < 0.05) crypt depth, cytokine production, Claudin-1 expression and relative

37

abundances of specific genera in epithelial bacteria. Collectively, the supplementation of

38

rhubarb could enhance host mucosal innate immune homeostasis by modulating intestinal

39

epithelial microbiota during early stages of animal development.

40

KEY WORDS: rhubarb, innate immune homeostasis, epithelial bacteria, small intestine,

41

young ruminants.

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

42

Page 4 of 32

INTRODUCTION

43

The constituency of a mammal’s body includes a diverse gut microbiota in which the

44

host benefits from the mutual relationship 1. Mounting evidence are emerging that the

45

microbial community perform various tasks that are indispensable to the host, such as

46

modulating host immune function, providing nutrients to the gut, maintaining metabolic

47

function, and defending against pathogens

48

intestinal lumen, their epithelial counterparts locate at the border of the tissue, and exert

49

significant roles in modulating host innate immune homeostasis 5. Toll like receptors (TLRs)

50

on the gut mucosa have the capacity to recognize microbial structures, thereby triggering

51

innate immune responses 6. Additionally, microbial products, such as acetate, propionate and

52

butyrate, have been proved exert anti-inflammatory effects 7.

2-4

. Compared to the microbes residing in the

53

Several factors have been demonstrated to shape host-microbiota symbiosis, with diet as

54

the main determinant. In the colon of goats, when compared to a hay diet, the high grain diet

55

increased the relative abundance of Blautia and decreased the relative abundances of Bacillus,

56

Enterococcus, and Lactococcus. And these were associated with intercellular tight junction

57

erosion, and up-regulation of gene expression of IL-2 and IFN-γ in the colonic mucosa 8.

58

Secondly, in both monogastric animals and ruminants, gastrointestinal bacterial diversity is

59

age-related, which at least partly, accounts for the elevated carbohydrate digestion capacity

60

9-12

61

Moreover, several studies indicated that early dietary manipulation of animals had a much

62

more lasting effect than those happening later in the lifetime

63

promising to regulate gastrointestinal microbial programming at early stages of animal

, highlighting the significance of age as another factor influencing host-microbe symbiosis.

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

13, 14

. On this premise, it is

Page 5 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

64

development.

65

The anti-cancer and anti-tumor properties of rhubarb have promoted a range of research

66

questions regarding the effect of rhubarb as a feed additive in shaping gastrointestinal

67

bacterial diversity of young animals 15. The anthraquinone of rhubarb shows a wide array of

68

pharmacological activities, including anti-inflammatory, antifungal and antibacterial effects 16.

69

Supplementation with 0.3% rhubarb extract in mice altered bacterial ecosystem in favor of

70

Akkermansia muciniphila and Parabacteroides goldsteinii in the gut digesta. And this was

71

coupled with improved hepatic injury, down-regulated inflammatory and oxidative stresses in

72

the liver

73

increased the relative abundances of Lachnospiraceae NK3A20 group, Ruminococcaceae

74

NK4A214 group and Christensenellaceae R-7 group, and in the ruminal mucosa of goats 18.

75

However, scanty knowledge is available regarding the effect of rhubarb supplementation on

76

interaction between epithelial bacteria and local innate immune function in the small

77

intestine.

17

. Another study conducted in our team revealed that rhubarb supplementation

78

Therefore, we aimed to explore the effects of rhubarb supplementation to the diet of

79

young goats on epithelial bacterial diversity and mucosal immune function in the jejunum

80

and ileum (d 50 and d 60). The DNA-based 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was used to

81

explore epithelial bacterial diversity, together with mRNA and protein level expression of

82

genes was used to investigate mucosal innate immune function.

83

MATERIALS AND METHODS

84

Ethics

85

All management and experimental protocols were in line with the animal care protocol 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

86

approved by the Animal Care Committee, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese

87

Academy of Sciences, Changsha, China, with protocol ISA-201603.

88

Animal management

89

Sixteen newborn Xiangdong black goats (native breed) were housed in a well-ventilated

90

room with controlled humidity and temperature. The goats were randomly assigned to two

91

diets: the control diet (Control, n = 8) and the diet supplemented with rhubarb (Rhubarb, n =

92

8). The rhubarb was obtained from a local herbalist retailer in Changsha, Hunan, China, and

93

contained the dried and milled rhizomes of Rheum offcinale Baill. The main bioactive

94

constituents of rhubarb root powder (% dry matter) are anthraquinone derivatives, including

95

rhein (3.12%), emodin (1.15%), aloe-emodin (1.42%), sennoside A (0.51%), sennoside B

96

(0.22%), physcion (0.08%) and chrysophano (0.06%). Goat kids were left with their mothers

97

until weaning at d 40, and reared separately from their mothers after weaning. For the

98

Rhubarb treatment, goats were gradually habituated to the rhubarb intervention from one

99

week before weaning. After weaning, goats in the Control group were supplied with a

100

mixture of 105 g starter concentrate (60% of total dry matter) and 70 g fresh grass

101

(Miscanthus sinensis, 40% of total dry matter) per meal. The diet was formulated to meet 1.3

102

times of maintenance metabolisable energy requirements on the basis of the feeding standard

103

of Chinese goats. Two goats in the Rhubarb group were removed due to the reason irrelevant

104

to the experiment, and the remaining goat kids received 175 g control diet plus 2.1875 g (1.25%

105

DM) rhubarb per meal. Four goats in the Control group, and three goats in the Rhubarb group

106

were slaughtered at each of the following days: d 50 and 60.

107

Sample collection 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 32

Page 7 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

108

Immediately after the goats were slaughtered, the jejunal and ileal tissue were rinsed

109

three times with ice-cold sterile phosphate-buffered saline (pH = 7.4). The tissue samples

110

were fixed in 10% formalin solution for anatomic analysis of villus and crypt. The mucosa

111

(approximately 2 g) were scraped from the underlying tissue with the help of a germ-free

112

glass slide, divided into four equal proportions, transferred into liquid nitrogen in a moment,

113

and then stored at -80°C. The four proportions were used for microbial DNA extraction,

114

mucosal RNA extraction, mucosal protein extraction, and mucosal cytokine detection,

115

respectively.

116

Morphology assessment

117

The jejunal and ileal tissue samples were removed from buffered formalin, processed in

118

low-melt paraffin, and then stained with eosin and hematoxylin (Sinopharm Chemical

119

Reagent Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China)

120

accompanying crypts were measured using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo,

121

Japan). The villus height was measured from the tip to the base, and the crypt depth was

122

measured from the base of the villus to the base of the crypt. The VCR (ratio of villus height

123

to crypt depth) was calculated.

124

Real-time PCR analysis

11

. Twenty random straightest villi and their

125

Total RNA was extracted from the mucosal samples using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen,

126

Carlsbad, CA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The genomic DNA was

127

removed by DNase I digestion (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The quantity and

128

quality of extracted RNA was evaluated using an ND1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop

129

Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE), and the RNA integrity was further verified through gel 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

130

electrophoresis. Afterwards, cDNA was synthesized using a commercial PrimeScript RT

131

reagent Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). The synthesized cDNA samples were stored at -20°C

132

until subsequent real-time PCR analysis.

133

Real-time PCR for expression of genes encoding innate immune homeostasis was

134

conducted on an ABI-7900HT qPCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA),

135

using SYBR Premix Ex TaqII (Tli RnaseH Plus, TaKaRa, Dalian, China) with default option.

136

All the primers are detailed in Supplemental Table S1 (β-actin and GADPH as the internal

137

references), and the 2−∆∆Ct method was used to analyze the relative gene expression 19.

138

Western blot analysis

139

The mucosa were ground in liquid nitrogen, and homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer

140

(Beyotime, Shanghai, China), with 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics GmbH,

141

Mannheim, Germany). Cell lysis was performed on ice for 30 min. Afterwards, the samples

142

were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was then taken as total

143

soluble protein (membrane and cytosol). The concentration of extracted protein was

144

determined using a commercially available enhanced BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime,

145

Shanghai, China). The extracted proteins (80 µL, 200 µg) were mixed with 5× loading buffer

146

(20 µL), incubated at 95 °C for 5 min, and stored at -20 °C.

147

Sample proteins (40 µg) and pre-stained standards were separated with SDS-PAGE in 12%

148

polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, 0.45 µM). After

149

blocking in 5% nonfat milk diluted in Western wash buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for 2

150

h at room temperature, the membranes were then incubated with primary antibodies for

151

overnight at 4°C. The primary antibodies consisted of mouse anti-β actin monoclonal 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 32

Page 9 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

152

antibody (Proteintech, Rosemont, USA), mouse anti-occludin polyclonal antibody, and rabbit

153

anti-claudin-1 polyclonal antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and. After several washes with

154

TBST, membranes were incubated with an anti-mouse or anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated

155

secondary antibody (Proteintech, Rosemont, USA) at 1/4000 dillution for 1.5 h at room

156

temperature. Then, the membranes were washed four times for 10 min with wash buffer, and

157

visualized using ImmobilonTM Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Merck Millipore,

158

Beijing, China). The densities of the blotting bands were analyzed using the AlphaImager

159

2200 digital imaging system (Digital Imaging System, Kirchheim, Germany).

160

Cytokine levels for intestinal mucosal samples

161

Three milliliters of 4°C PBS (pH = 7.4) was added to intestinal mucosa (1 g), and then

162

homogenizated on ice using a Vibra CellTM sonicator (Bertin technoloies, Montigny le

163

Bretonneux, France) for 5 times for 15 s with 10-s intervals. The homogenates were

164

centrifuged (10,000 × g for 8 min at 4°C), and the supernatant fluids were used for

165

determining cytokine concentrations (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-10), following the user's

166

instructions of commercially available ELISA kits (Cusabio, Wuhan, China). All the

167

measurements were done in triplicate.

168

Microbial DNA extraction

169

Total genomic DNA extraction was carried out on the mucosal samples using the 20

170

bead-beating method as suggested by Chen and her colleagues

171

measured using 1% agarose gel, and DNA quantity was determined based on absorbance at

172

260 and 280 nm, respectively, with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop

173

Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

. The quality of DNA was

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

174

Page 10 of 32

Amplicon sequencing

175

The amplicon sequencing was conducted using the method modified from Kozich, et al.

176

(2013). Specifically, the V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was targeted using

177

specific

178

GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT-3'), with each sample had its unique barcode. For each DNA

179

sample, 30 µL of reaction mix was prepared which contained 15 µL of Phusion Master Mix

180

(New England Biolabs, Beijing, China), 3 µL of each barcoded primer (2 µM ), 2 µL of dd

181

H2O and 10 µL of DNA (3 ng/µL). The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation

182

at 98◦C for 3 min; 30 cycles of denaturation (95◦C, 20 s), annealing (50◦C, 30 s) and

183

elongation (72◦C, 30 s); and a final 5-min extension at 72◦C for 5 min. Afterwards,

184

amplification products were verified through agarose gel electrophoresis. Product quantities

185

were determined and equal molar amount of each product was pooled. The pooled products

186

were run in a 2% agarose gel, and bands were purified with QIAquick Gel extraction Kit

187

(Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The amplicon library was constructed using TruSeq® DNA

188

PCR-Free Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, USA) prior to submission on an

189

Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing system generating 250 bp paired-end reads.

190

Bioinformatics analysis

primers

515F

(5'-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3')

and

806R

(5'-

191

The raw data were deconvoluted according to their barcodes, filtered through the quality

192

control pipeline using the Quantitative Insight into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) software 22,

193

and the primers were trimmed. Two jejunal samples in the Control group that failed quality

194

control (one sample at d 50 and one sample at d 60, respectively) were excluded for

195

taxonomic classification; therefore, 26 samples were analyzed. The pair-end reads were 9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

196

assembled into tags using FLASH 23. Chimeric sequences were removed using UCHIME 24.

197

Sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of 97% sequence identity

198

using UPARSE

199

performed against the latest Greengenes database (May, 2013 release) using the RDP

200

classifier with a 0.80 confidence threshold. Sequences were aligned using PyNAST software

201

(Version 1.2), and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using FastTree

202

(Observed species, Chao1, Shannon, Simpson, ACE and Good’s coverage) and beta diversity

203

(UniFrac distance) were calculated using QIIME

204

was conducted using vegan, ade4 and ggplot2 packages implemented in the R software

205

(http://www.R-project.org/). The sequences obtained in the current paper have been deposited

206

in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA407285.

207

Statistics analysis

25

. Taxonomic assignment of the representative sequences of OTUs was

26

. Alpha diversity

22

. Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA)

208

Data were analyzed according to the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary,

209

NC). The model included the fixed effects of rhubarb supplementation, age and their

210

interaction, together with the random effect of animal nested within rhubarb supplementation

211

× age. Each animal was used as the experiment unit, and Tukey’s test was used to compare

212

least squares means. An α-level of P ≤ 0.05 was taken for indication of statistical significance,

213

and the α-level of P ≤ 0.10 was used to indicate a statistical tendency.

214

RESULTS

215

Small intestinal morphology

216

Diet and age unaffected (P > 0.10) villus height, crypt depth and CVR in the jejunum

10

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

217

(Table 1). In the ileum, the supplementation of rhubarb increased (P = 0.036) villus height,

218

and crypt depth increased (P = 0.044) with age.

219

Gene expression pattern

220

As illustrated in Table 2, for toll like receptors, in the jejunum, TLR-2 expression tended

221

to decrease (P = 0.075), while TLR-4 expression increased (P < 0.001) as age increased. In

222

the ileum, TLR-2 expression decreased (P = 0.029) with age. Diet × age interaction (P =

223

0.033) was observed for TLR-4 expression. The supplementation of rhubarb decreased (P =

224

0.006) TLR-4 expression, while age elevated (P < 0.001) TLR-4 expression.

225

For cytokines, in the jejunum, diet and age unaffected (P > 0.10) expression of TNF-α

226

and IFN-γ. IL-1β expression increased with age (P < 0.001). The supplementation of rhubarb

227

tended to elevate (P = 0.057) IL-10 expression. In the ileum, diet and age unaffected (P >

228

0.10) TNF-α expression. Diet × age interaction was significant for IL-1β expression (P =

229

0.020), and tended to be significant for IFN-γ expression (P = 0.099). The supplementation of

230

rhubarb decreased (P = 0.036) IL-1β expression, whilst increased (P = 0.011) IL-10

231

expression. Expression of both IL-1β and IL-10 increased (P < 0.01) with age.

232

For tight junction proteins, in the jejunum, diet and age unaffected (P > 0.10) expression

233

of Occludin and Claudin-2. Diet × age interaction (P = 0.005) was observed for Claudin-1

234

expression. The supplementation of rhubarb elevated (P = 0.005) Claudin-1 expression and

235

age affected (P = 0.039) its values. Claudin-4 expression tended to decrease (P = 0.063) with

236

age. In the ileum, diet × age interaction (P = 0.002) was observed for Claudin-1 expression.

237

Its value was enhanced by the supplementation of rhubarb (P = 0.008), while was decreased

238

by age (P = 0.002). 11

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 32

Page 13 of 32

239

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Functional protein expression pattern

240

As presented in Figure 1, in the jejunum, the supplementation of rhubarb enhanced (P =

241

0.032) Claudin-1 protein expression. Greater Claudin-1 (P = 0.025), while lower Occudin (P

242

= 0.009) protein expression was noted on d 60 when compared with d 50. In the ileum, diet

243

and age unaffected (P > 0.10) Occludin protein expression. Furthermore, there was diet × age

244

interaction (P = 0.018) on Claudin-1 protein expression. Both rhubarb supplementation (P =

245

0.047) and age (P = 0.015) up-regulated Occludin protein expression on d 60.

246

Mucosal cytokine secretion

247

As reflected by ELISA, in the jejunum, diet and age unaffected mucosal TNF-α

248

concentration (Table 3). The supplementation of rhubarb tended to decrease (P = 0.088)

249

mucosal IL-1β concentration. Mucosal IL-1β concentration decreased (P = 0.004), while

250

IL-10 concentration increased (P < 0.001) with age. Moreover, in the ileum, mucosal TNF-α

251

concentration increased (P = 0.004) with age. Diet × age interactions (P < 0.01) were

252

observed for mucosal concentrations of IL-1β and IL-10. The supplementation of rhubarb

253

decreased (P = 0.012) mucosal IL-1β concentration, whilst increased (P < 0.001) IL-10

254

concentration. Mucosal IL-1β concentration tended to decrease (P = 0.071), whilst IL-10

255

concentration increased (P < 0.001) from d 50 to 60.

256

Epithelial bacterial community diversity and composition

257

All samples were rarefied at 47, 062 reads per sample, and the Good' coverage (from

258

0.988 to 0.997) indicated that sampling depth was adequate (Table 4). In the jejunum, most

259

alpha diversity indices were unaffected (P > 0.10) by age, while observed species, Chao1 and

260

ACE indices were increased by the supplementation of rhubarb (P < 0.01). In the ileum, diet 12

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

261

× age interactions were observed for Shannon (P = 0.018) and Simpson (P = 0.011) indices.

262

They increased with age (P < 0.05), and were elevated by the supplementation of rhubarb (P

263

< 0.01). Moreover, the supplementation of rhubarb elevated observed species, Chao1, and

264

ACE indices (P < 0.01), and observed species increased from d 50 to 60 (P = 0.044).

265

As presented in Figure 2, PCoA analysis revealed that a clear separation between

266

Control and Rhubarb groups in the jejunum and ileum at d 50, while did not show a clear

267

separation of Control and Rhubarb groups in the jejunum and ileum at d 60. Meanwhile,

268

except Rhubarb group in the ileum, clear separations between d 50 and 60 in both groups

269

were observed in the jejunum and ileum.

270

Analysis of epithelial microbiome showed shifts in bacterial relative abundances at both

271

the phylum and genus levels when rhubarb was supplemented at d 50 and 60. As illustrated in

272

Table 5, at the phylum level, in the jejunum, an increase in the sequences assigned to

273

Chloroflexi was found when rhubarb was supplemented (P = 0.008), and relative abundances

274

of Actinobacteria and Cyanobacteria increased with age (P < 0.05). In the ileum, diet × age

275

interactions were observed for relative abundances of Acidobacteria (P = 0.038) and

276

Actinobacteria (P = 0.005). Increases in relative abundances of Actinobacteria (P = 0.026),

277

Chloroflexi (P = 0.022) and a decline in relative abundance of Firmicutes (P = 0.018) were

278

observed when rhubarb was supplemented. Moreover, relative abundance of Proteobacteria

279

increased (P = 0.017), relative abundance of Cyanobacteria tended to increase (P = 0.096),

280

whilst relative abundance of Firmicutes (P = 0.001) decreased from d 50 to 60.

281

Bacterial composition at the genus level revealed that in the jejunum, relative abundance

282

of Veillonella tended to increase by the supplementation of rhubarb (P = 0.084, Table 6). 13

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 32

Page 15 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

283

Relative abundances of Actinomyces (P = 0.054) and Rothia (P = 0.060) tended to increase,

284

and relative abundances of Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and Veillonella increased from d

285

50 to 60 (P < 0.05). In the ileum, diet × age interactions were significant for relative

286

abundances of Blautia, Butyrivibrio and Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas (P < 0.05), and

287

tended to be significant for relative abundance of Bifidobacterium (P = 0.079). An increase in

288

relative abundance of Blautia (P = 0.002), increase trends in relative abundances of

289

Clostridium (P = 0.089), Lactobacillus (P = 0.060), Pseudomonas (P = 0.087), and a

290

decrease in relative abundance of Staphylococcus (P < 0.001) were observed when rhubarb

291

was supplemented. Furthermore, relative abundances of Actinomyces (P = 0.048), Rothia (P

292

= 0.020), Staphylococcus (P < 0.001) and Veillonella (P = 0.048) decreased, while relative

293

abundance of Pseudomonas (P = 0.025) increased from d 50 to 60.

294

DISCUSION

295

The phytochemicals present in the rhubarb, especially anthraquinone derivatives such as

296

rhein, emodin and aloe-emodin, have been proposed to exert beneficial effects as

297

pharmacological drugs to inflammation, liver injury, and cancer

298

conducted in pathological condition of adult rodents and humans. Therapeutic and toxic

299

effects of rhubarb were reported to be dose dependent, with hepatotoxicity occurred at doses >

300

3 g/ kg body weight per day 27, whilst hepatoprotective effects occurred at doses around 0.35

301

to 0.50 g/kg body weight per day 17, 28. In the present study, we for the first time, used a dose

302

of 0.47 to 0.49 g/kg body weight per day in young goats at early ages after weaning (d 50 and

303

60). In order to accustom the sucking ruminants to concentrate and forage based solid diets,

304

early weaning (d 40) and the related nutritional interventions have been regarded as effective 14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

16

. Most of the studies are

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 16 of 32

29

305

approaches to improve feed efficiency and immune function

. As anticipated, rhubarb

306

presented a potential candidate for supplementation to benefit intestinal homeostasis.

307

The supplementation of rhubarb drastically improved morphology of ileal mucosa with

308

higher villus length, implying better absorptive capacity for nutrients. It has been reported

309

that gut barrier is primarily regulated by well-organized tight junction proteins between

310

intestinal epithelial cells, which are constituted of trans-membrane proteins such as occludin,

311

claudin and junctional adhesion molecular, together with adaptor proteins such as zonula

312

occluden protein

313

remarkably up-regulated in the Rhubarb group at both mRNA and protein levels. We thereby

314

speculated that gut barrier function was elevated by rhubarb intervention to prevent the

315

passage of harmful intra-luminal permeations, including foreign microbes and their toxins 31.

30

. In the current study, the trans-membrane Claudin-1 protein was

316

Weaning has been suggested to be related to up-regulation of pro-inflammatory

317

cytokines in the small intestine, leading to increased epithelial permeability and inflammation

318

in piglets and calves

319

intestine through rhubarb intervention in goat kids during early life. Within the

320

pro-inflammatory cytokines examined, expression of IL-1β at mRNA level and its mucosal

321

concentration was down-regulated by the supplementation of rhubarb. Toll like receptor

322

(TLR) signaling pathway can provide insights into the mechanism by which inflammation is

323

prevented. Strikingly, TLR-4 gene expression was inhibited in the ileum. This is in line with

324

previous observation that supplementation of rhubarb extract inhibited TLR-4 signaling in the

325

liver of mice 17. In fact, TLR signaling can be activated by recognizing microbial-associated

326

molecular patterns such as lipopeptides, LPS, glycolipids and flagellin, and thereafter elicits a

32, 33

. Herein, we aimed to prevent local inflammation in the small

15

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

327

pro-inflammatory signaling pathway dependent on NF-κ B 6. Moreover, anti-inflammatory

328

cytokine IL-10 was enhanced at both gene expression and mucosa levels at d 50. The IL-10 is

329

produced preferentially by mononuclear phagocytes and lymphocytes, and this cytokine has

330

the capacity to inhibit secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines

331

Collectively, rhubarb intervention inhibited TLR-4-dependent inflammation and promoted

332

anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion.

34

.

333

The link between mucosal innate immune function and gut microbiota is well

334

established 35, and it is mostly bidirectional; changes in gut microbiota may not only occur as

335

a result of dysbiosis in gut barrier, but also contribute to maintain intestinal immune

336

homeostasis. The proximity that epithelial bacteria are in intimate contact with the gut

337

mucosa provides them with a higher potential in exerting effects on host mucosal immunity

338

than their digesta counterparts

339

examined in this study. As manifested by PCoA, Control and Rhubarb groups harbored their

340

unique epithelial bacteria at d 50, while there were no clear separations between them at d 60.

341

These suggest that the effect of rhubarb intervention on epithelial bacteria in the small

342

intestine is not consistent at different developmental stages of young ruminants.

36

. On this premise, epithelial bacterial community was

343

Further evaluation on taxonomic composition revealed that members of Proteobacteria

344

phylum were predominant in the epithelia of jejunum and ileum. It is well demonstrated that

345

the small intestine is characterized by relatively high levels of oxygen, and the steep oxygen

346

gradient in the mucosa creates a microenvironment for survival of these oxygen-tolerant

347

communities 5. A shift in favor of Akkermansia muciniphila and Parabacteroides goldsteinii

348

in the microbial ecosystem of cecal digesta was observed when mice was fed with a diet 16

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 18 of 32

349

supplemented with 0.3% rhubarb 17. Further study revealed that ethanol exposure diminished

350

abundance of A. muciniphila in the intestine of both humans and mice, which could be

351

recovered in experimental alcoholic liver disease by oral supplementation

352

suggest that A. muciniphila can promote intestinal barrier function and ameliorate

353

experimental ALD. However, in the present study, relative abundance of A. muciniphila in

354

epithelial community was relatively low (< 0.5%), and was unaffected by the

355

supplementation

356

supplementation of rhubarb did not result from colonization of this species in the epithelium.

357

In contrast, in the ileum, relative abundance of Staphylococcus genus at d 50 was drastically

358

decreased during rhubarb intervention. Some species of Staphylococcus, such as S. aureus,

359

can produce S. aureus enterotoxin B (SEB), which is potent activator of the immune system,

360

and has the capacity to disturb barrier function 38. The decreased Staphylococcus abundance

361

can, at least partly, explain enhanced barrier function by the supplementation of rhubarb.

362

Another reason lies in the noticeable increase in relative abundances of Clostridium and

363

Lactobacillus in the ileal epithelium during rhubarb intervention. Similar observation of

364

elevated relative abundance of Lactobacillus after the treatment of rhubarb was found in the

365

rumen of steers

366

indispensible roles in host resistance against intestinal pathogens and maintaining host

367

immune homeostasis 40, 41. All these confirm the hypothesis that the enhanced mucosal innate

368

immune homeostasis by rhubarb supplementation is, at least partly, mediated by altered

369

epithelial bacterial community in the small intestine.

370

of

rhubarb,

suggesting

that enhanced

37

. All these

barrier function

by

the

39

. Most species of these two genera are beneficial bacteria, and play

In conclusion, the supplementation of rhubarb during early life improved host mucosal 17

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

371

innate immune homeostasis in the small intestine, as characterized by increased villus height

372

and elevated barrier function. These were associated with shifts in ileal epithelial bacteria in

373

favor of Blautia, Clostridium, Lactobacillus and Pseudomonas. The present study aids in

374

enhancing knowledge regarding to the crosstalk among microbiota, nutrition and immunity,

375

and highlights the prospect of rhubarb as a feed additive to improve health status during early

376

life of ruminants.

377

378

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

379

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of

380

China (grants 31601967, 31320103917), the Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of

381

Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture,

382

Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. ISA2016301), Youth Innovation Team Project of

383

ISA, CAS (2017QNCXTD_ZCS), and the project from Mr. Sheng Yang, Mr. Genhuo Shao,

384

and DA BEI NONG Group (No. B2016009).

385

386

REFERENCES

387

1.

Hill, C. J.; Lynch, D. B.; Murphy, K.; Ulaszewska, M.; Jeffery, I. B.; O'Shea, C. A.; Watkins, C.;

388

Dempsey, E.; Mattivi, F.; Touhy, K.; Ross, R. P.; Ryan, C. A.; PW, O. T.; Stanton, C., Evolution

389

of gut microbiota composition from birth to 24 weeks in the INFANTMET Cohort. Microbiome

390

2017, 5, 4.

391

2.

health. Nat Rev. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012, 9, 577-589.

392 393

Flint, H. J.; Scott, K. P.; Louis, P.; Duncan, S. H., The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and

3.

Bin, P.; Liu, S.; Chen, S.; Zeng, Z.; Huang, R.; Yin, Y.; Liu, G., The effect of aspartate

394

supplementation on the microbial composition and innate immunity on mice. Amino Acids 2017,

395

49, 2045-2051. 18

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

396

4. Ren, W.; Yin, J.; Duan, J.; Liu, G.; Zhu, X.; Chen, S.; Li, T.; Wang, S.; Tang, Y.; Hardwidge, P. R.,

397

Mouse intestinal innate immune responses altered by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC)

398

infection. Microbes Infect 2014, 16, 954-61.

399

5.

Nat Rev Microbiol 2016, 14, 20-32.

400 401

6.

Kawai, T.; Akira, S., The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol 2010, 11, 373-84.

402 403

Donaldson, G. P.; Lee, S. M.; Mazmanian, S. K., Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota.

7.

Segain, J. P.; de la Bletiere, D. R.; Bourreille, A.; Leray, V.; Gervois, N.; Rosales, C.; Ferrier, L.;

404

Bonnet, C.; Blottiere, H. M.; Galmiche, J. P., Butyrate inhibits inflammatory responses through

405

NF kappa B inhibition: implications for Crohn's disease. Gut 2000, 47, 397-403.

406

8.

Ye, H.; Liu, J.; Feng, P.; Zhu, W.; Mao, S., Grain-rich diets altered the colonic fermentation and

407

mucosa-associated bacterial communities and induced mucosal injuries in goats. Sci Rep 2016, 6,

408

20329.

409

9.

Niu, Q.; Li, P.; Hao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, S. W.; Li, H.; Ma, X.; Gao, S.; He, L.; Wu, W.; Huang,

410

X.; Hua, J.; Zhou, B.; Huang, R., Dynamic distribution of the gut microbiota and the relationship

411

with apparent crude fiber digestibility and growth stages in pigs. Sci Rep 2015, 5, 9938.

412 413

10. Jiao, J.; Huang, J.; Zhou, C.; Tan, Z., Taxonomic identification of ruminal epithelial bacterial diversity during rumen development in goats. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015, 81, 3502-9.

414

11. Jiao, J.; Li, X.; Beauchemin, K. A.; Tan, Z.; Tang, S.; Zhou, C., Rumen development process in

415

goats as affected by supplemental feeding v. grazing: age-related anatomic development,

416

functional achievement and microbial colonisation. Bri J Nutr 2015, 113, 888-900.

417

12. Jiao, J.; Wu, J.; Zhou, C.; Tang, S.; Wang, M.; Tan, Z., Composition of ileal bacterial community

418

in grazing goats varies across non-rumination, transition and rumination stages of life. Front

419

Microbiol 2016, 7, 1364.

420

13. Abecia, L.; Martin-Garcia, A. I.; Martinez, G.; Newbold, C. J.; Yanez-Ruiz, D. R., Nutritional

421

intervention in early life to manipulate rumen microbial colonization and methane output by kid

422

goats postweaning. J Anim Sci 2013, 91, 4832-40.

423 424 425 426 427 428

14. Malmuthuge, N.; Guan, L. L., Understanding host-microbial interactions in rumen: searching the best opportunity for microbiota manipulation. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2017, 8, 8. 15. Huang, Q.; Lu, G.; Shen, H. M.; Chung, M. C.; Ong, C. N., Anti-cancer properties of anthraquinones from rhubarb. Med Res Rev 2007, 27, 609-30. 16. Malik, E. M.; Muller, C. E., Anthraquinones as pharmacological tools and drugs. Med Res Rev 2016, 36, 705-48.

429

17. Neyrinck, A. M.; Etxeberria, U.; Taminiau, B.; Daube, G.; Van Hul, M.; Everard, A.; Cani, P. D.;

430

Bindels, L. B.; Delzenne, N. M., Rhubarb extract prevents hepatic inflammation induced by

431

acute alcohol intake, an effect related to the modulation of the gut microbiota. Mol Nutr Food

432

Res 2017, 61. 19

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 32

Page 21 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

433

18. Wang, Z.; Elekwachi, C.; Jiao, J.; Wang, M.; Tang, S.; Zhou, C.; Tan, Z.; Forster, R. J., Changes

434

in metabolically active bacterial community during rumen development, and their alteration by

435

Rhubarb root powder revealed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Front Microbiol 2017, 8.

436

19. Livak, K. J.; Schmittgen, T. D., Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time

437

quantitative PCR and the 2− ∆∆CT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402-408.

438

20. Chen, Y.; Penner, G. B.; Li, M.; Oba, M., Changes in bacterial diversity associated with epithelial

439

tissue in the beef cow rumen during the transition to a high-grain diet. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

440

2011, 77, 5770-5781.

441

21. Kozich, J. J.; Westcott, S. L.; Baxter, N. T.; Highlander, S. K.; Schloss, P. D., Development of a

442

dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on

443

the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013, 79, 5112-20.

444

22. Caporaso, J. G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F. D.; Costello, E. K.;

445

Fierer, N.; Pena, A. G.; Goodrich, J. K.; Gordon, J. I.; Huttley, G. A.; Kelley, S. T.; Knights, D.;

446

Koenig, J. E.; Ley, R. E.; Lozupone, C. A.; McDonald, D.; Muegge, B. D.; Pirrung, M.; Reeder,

447

J.; Sevinsky, J. R.; Turnbaugh, P. J.; Walters, W. A.; Widmann, J.; Yatsunenko, T.; Zaneveld, J.;

448

Knight, R., QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods

449

2010, 7, 335-6.

450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457

23. Magoc, T.; Salzberg, S. L., FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2957-63. 24. Edgar, R. C.; Haas, B. J.; Clemente, J. C.; Quince, C.; Knight, R., UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2194-200. 25. Edgar, R. C., UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 2013, 10, 996-8. 26. Price, M. N.; Dehal, P. S.; Arkin, A. P., FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol 2009, 26, 1641-50.

458

27. Wang, J. B.; Zhao, H. P.; Zhao, Y. L.; Jin, C.; Liu, D. J.; Kong, W. J.; Fang, F.; Zhang, L.; Wang,

459

H. J.; Xiao, X. H., Hepatotoxicity or hepatoprotection? Pattern recognition for the paradoxical

460

effect of the Chinese herb Rheum palmatum L. in treating rat liver injury. PloS one 2011, 6,

461

e24498.

462

28. Ding, Y.; Zhao, L.; Mei, H.; Zhang, S.-L.; Huang, Z.-H.; Duan, Y.-Y.; Ye, P., Exploration of

463

Emodin to treat alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate-induced cholestatic hepatitis via anti-inflammatory

464

pathway. Eur J Pharmacology 2008, 590, 377-386.

465

29. Liu, J.; Bian, G.; Sun, D.; Zhu, W.; Mao, S., Starter feeding supplementation alters colonic

466

mucosal bacterial communities and modulates mucosal immune homeostasis in newborn lambs.

467

Front Microbiol 2017, 8, 429.

468 469

30. Matter, K.; Balda, M. S., Signalling to and from tight junctions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003, 4, 225-36. 20

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

470 471

31. Groschwitz, K. R.; Hogan, S. P., Intestinal barrier function: molecular regulation and disease pathogenesis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009, 124, 3-20; quiz 21-2.

472

32. Pie, S.; Lalles, J. P.; Blazy, F.; Laffitte, J.; Seve, B.; Oswald, I. P., Weaning is associated with an

473

upregulation of expression of inflammatory cytokines in the intestine of piglets. J Nutr 2004, 134,

474

641-647.

475

33. Connor, E. E.; Baldwin, R. L.; Li, C.-j.; Li, R. W.; Chung, H., Gene expression in bovine rumen

476

epithelium during weaning identifies molecular regulators of rumen development and growth.

477

Func Integr Genomi 2013, 13, 133-142.

478 479 480 481

34. Striz, I.; Brabcova, E.; Kolesar, L.; Sekerkova, A., Cytokine networking of innate immunity cells: a potential target of therapy. Clin Sci (Lond) 2014, 126, 593-612. 35. Abraham, C.; Medzhitov, R., Interactions between the host innate immune system and microbes in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 1729-37.

482

36. Kelly, J.; Daly, K.; Moran, A. W.; Ryan, S.; Bravo, D.; Shirazi-Beechey, S. P., Composition and

483

diversity of mucosa-associated microbiota along the entire length of the pig gastrointestinal tract;

484

dietary influences. Environ Microbiol 2016.

485

37. Grander, C.; Adolph, T. E.; Wieser, V.; Lowe, P.; Wrzosek, L.; Gyongyosi, B.; Ward, D. V.;

486

Grabherr, F.; Gerner, R. R.; Pfister, A.; Enrich, B.; Ciocan, D.; Macheiner, S.; Mayr, L.; Drach,

487

M.; Moser, P.; Moschen, A. R.; Perlemuter, G.; Szabo, G.; Cassard, A. M.; Tilg, H., Recovery of

488

ethanol-induced Akkermansia muciniphila depletion ameliorates alcoholic liver disease. Gut

489

2017.

490

38. Perez-Bosque, A.; Amat, C.; Polo, J.; Campbell, J. M.; Crenshaw, J.; Russell, L.; Moreto, M.,

491

Spray-dried animal plasma prevents the effects of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B on

492

intestinal barrier function in weaned rats. J Nutr 2006, 136, 2838-43.

493

39. Kim, K. H.; Arokiyaraj, S.; Lee, J.; Oh, Y. K.; Chung, H. Y.; Jin, G.-D.; Kim, E. B.; Kim, E. K.;

494

Lee, Y.; Baik, M., Effect of rhubarb (Rheum spp.) root on in vitro and in vivo ruminal methane

495

production and a bacterial community analysis based on 16S rRNA sequence. Ani Prod Sci 2016,

496

56, 402-408.

497 498

40. Walter, J., Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: Implications for fundamental and biomedical research. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74, 4985-4996.

499

41. Chung, H.; Pamp, S. J.; Hill, J. A.; Surana, N. K.; Edelman, S. M.; Troy, E. B.; Reading, N. C.;

500

Villablanca, E. J.; Wang, S.; Mora, J. R.; Umesaki, Y.; Mathis, D.; Benoist, C.; Relman, D. A.;

501

Kasper, D. L., Gut immune maturation depends on colonization with a host-specific microbiota.

502

Cell 2012, 149, 1578-93.

503 504 505 506 21

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 32

Page 23 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

507 508

Table 1. Small intestinal morphology in the Control and Rhubarb groups of goat kids at d 50 and 60

Item

Diet

Jejunum Villus height, µm Crypt depth, µm VCR Ileum Villus height, µm Crypt depth, µm VCR 509 510 511 512

Age (d)

Diet

P value Age Diet × Age

23.15

0.682

0.436

0.625

2.74

0.230

0.549

0.645

0.188

0.544

0.640

0.813

11.76

0.036

0.222

0.737

3.87

0.378

0.044

0.383

0.191

0.486

0.198

0.581

SEM

50

60

C R C R C R

567.2 545.7 99.4 94.5 5.71 5.78

574.3 576.3 99.8 97.5 5.75 5.92

C R C R C R

488.3 512.7 97.1 97.1 5.03 5.28

499.6 532.2 102.5 109.6 4.88 4.91

VCR, villus crypt ratio; C, Control group; R, Rhubarb group.

22

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

513 514 515 516

Page 24 of 32

Table 2. Expression patterns of mucosal innate immune function related genes in the Control and Rhubarb groups of goat kids at d 50 and 60

Item

Diet

50

60

1.27 1.53 1.09 1.35

0.62 0.77 2.61 3.03

6.80 6.09 2.85 2.63

C R C R C R C R C R C R C R C R

Toll like receptors Jejunum TLR-2 C R TLR-4 C R Ileum TLR-2 C R TLR-4 C R Cytokines Jejunum IL-1β TNF-α IFN-γ IL-10 Ileum IL-1β TNF-α IFN-γ IL-10

Age (d)

Tight junction proteins Jejunum Occludin C R Claudin-1 C R

SEM

Diet

P value Age Diet × Age

0.355

0.580

0.075

0.888

0.255

0.216