Separation of Metal Ions by Cation Exchange

the sulfonated coal known as Zeo-Karb, which was first, washed with concentrated hydrochloric acid to remove metallic cations and small amounts of iro...
1 downloads 0 Views 108KB Size
SEP.AR.ATIOK O F 1IET.IL I O S S RY CYTIOS EXCHLSGE

47 1

dEP*IR.ITIOS OF METAIL IOSS BY C-ITIOS T

H E JYI1,TOX

-1o ~ t h i ~ ~ s i cI i- )i iii i c r s i i 1 .

Rccciictl

.Iiti.c

Eioii\loti

Zllitioi?

14, 1946

It is it aell-knonn fact that metal ions are taken up preferentiallv from solution by materials capable of cation exchange. I t should, theretore. he possible to separate a mixture 01 cations of ~ a r y i n gionic size I J paszaqe ~ through an exchanger. This principle has been used hy Russell and I'earce i l ) 111 a n attempt to fractionate the rare earth+. Tests ha\ e here heen made TI ith a number of different mixtures--copper a n ~ lnickci, radmium and zinc. siiwr and copperto deteiniine n hether a practical ciuanti:xtiT e -eparation could be attained hy cation eschange. E X P L R I ~ I E \r 11,

'The cation exchange1 iiseti was the iiilfonatc 1 coal hnon n as Zeo-Karb, liicli ai firit \ra.:hed with concentrated hyclrochloric acid to remove metallic cation> and small amounts of iron oxide and then rinsed n i t h n-ater. All experiments but the last one cited ircre perlormed in n 2-ft. column of 20-mm. glass tubing, containiiig TO g. of Zeo-Kaih In the last experiment, a W t . column. containing 244 g. Zeo-Iiaiil. u a s used. I n most cases. the solution contaming R mixtiire of t n o salt.: was pa-ed through the exchanger at a rate or about 10 nil. per minute until one of the inetal ions began to appeal in the eifluent. The metals i t eie then regenerated TI itli acid, 100-mi. fiactions being collected and a!ialyzcd 130th ammoniacal :md sl~ghtiyacid solutions of varying concrntrntions v e i c tried Save typical rehiilt> m e given in table 1 11

c O ~ c 1 . ~ - ~ 1 0 ~

'Ihe fractionation of mctal ion. 17)- cation eschange does not give a quantitative separation. The methoti coulti be improved liy using a n:uch longer column, Iiut the proce- u ould thex not 1.e as practical as chemical separation. This investigation western I-nivemity.

IIXS

siipportccl by a gmni from the Abbott Fund of S o r t h 1IEFE:ItES ('E

(1) RL-SSELL.+xnPE.IWE:tJ. ~ i 1 1 1 .('hem. SOC.65, 595-600 11913).

472

R.

BOZAK - 4 S D H. F. WALTON

TABLE 1 Separation of metal ions b y cation exchange INELUENT

RECIESER.AN1

,

EFFLUENT FRACTION

ANALYSIS

ml.

Cu and Si analyzed electrolytically millimoles Cu 13.4 33.4 12.7

0-100 100-200 200-500

200-400

peared in effluent

I

I

100-200 200-300 300-800

+

2 liters AgSS04 (0.01 M) CuSOc (0.01 -14); stopped when Cu first appeared in effluent

0- 100 500-600 600-700 in0-1300

12.4 26.0

7.0

__

-

59.5

45.4

0.5

-

-

6.8 5.4 16.6

12.9 0.8 0.2

0.5

__

-

29.8

18.7

millimoles A g

2 M HZSOc

millimoles Si

0.6 3 .-I

millimoles Cu

5.1

14.6 1.3 0.5

21.7

0.1

30.8

16.5