Simulating effluent organic matter competition in micro-pollutant

Jun 11, 2018 - Adsorption onto activated carbon is a promising option for removing organic micro-pollutants (OMPs) from wastewater treatment plant (WW...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Sussex Library

Remediation and Control Technologies

Simulating effluent organic matter competition in micro-pollutant adsorption onto activated carbon using a surrogate competitor Stefan Dittmar, Frederik Zietzschmann, Maike Mai, Eckhard Worch, Martin Jekel, and Aki Sebastian Ruhl Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01503 • Publication Date (Web): 11 Jun 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 12, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Simulating effluent organic matter competition in

2

micro-pollutant adsorption onto activated carbon

3

using a surrogate competitor

4

Stefan Dittmar a, Frederik Zietzschmann a, Maike Mai b, Eckhard Worch c, Martin Jekel a,

5

Aki S. Ruhl a,*

6

a

7

Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany

8

b

9

Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany

Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Water Quality Control, Sekr. KF4,

Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Soil Science, Sekr. BH 10-1,

10

c

11

ABSTRACT

12

Adsorption onto activated carbon is a promising option for removing organic micro-pollutants

13

(OMPs) from wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents. The heterogeneity of activated

14

carbons and adsorption competition between OMPs and adsorbable compounds of the effluent

15

organic matter (EfOM) complicate the prediction of OMP removals. Thus, reliable and simple

16

test systems are desirable. For this study, batch experiments with powdered activated carbon

17

(PAC) were carried out to examine methyl orange (MO) as a selected surrogate competitor to

Technische Universität Dresden, Institute of Water Chemistry, 01062 Dresden, Germany

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 26

18

simulate EfOM adsorption competition. MO solutions were spiked with carbamazepine (CBZ) as

19

indicator substance for well-adsorbing OMPs. On the basis of CBZ adsorption isotherms in

20

WWTP effluents, MO concentrations for batch test solutions with identical adsorption

21

competition towards CBZ were calculated. The calculations were performed according to an

22

empirical model of CBZ adsorption in presence of MO, since predictions employing the ideal

23

adsorbed solution theory (IAST) proved to be inaccurate. Comparative batch tests with five

24

different PAC were conducted with WWTP effluent and respective MO batch test solutions.

25

Except for one PAC, the achieved CBZ removals were very similar in WWTP effluent and the

26

test solution. Additionally, a universal correlation between MO and CBZ removals was found for

27

four PAC.

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

28

INTRODUCTION

29

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are considered a main source of organic micro-

30

pollutant (OMP) emissions to the aquatic environment.1 Consequently, several advanced

31

wastewater treatments are currently being tested and already have been implemented in large

32

scale to meet the insufficient eliminations of numerous OMPs in conventional WWTPs.2 Besides

33

ozonation, activated carbon for adsorbing and thus removing target compounds from WWTP

34

effluent is one of the most promising options.3-5

35

Activated carbons are either used as granules (GAC) in fixed-bed adsorbers or as powdered

36

activated carbon (PAC) in slurry reactors. They are derived from different organic precursors

37

(e.g. bituminous coal, lignite, charcoal, wood, organic waste) by physical or chemical

38

activation.6 As a result, the properties of commercial carbons can vary greatly and so do their

39

adsorption capacities regarding different OMPs.7 Characteristic properties that are commonly

40

used to describe adsorbents (e.g. BET surface, nitrobenzene number) allow only partially

41

successful predictions.8 Additionally, OMP removals also depend on the composition of the

42

respective aqueous phase. The composition of WWTP effluent fluctuates both temporally and

43

regionally.9-10 WWTP effluents contain a large variety of organic compounds, usually comprised

44

as effluent organic matter (EfOM), which compete for adsorption sites and thus impair OMP

45

removals. OMPs are present at individual concentrations around ng/L or µg/L whereas EfOM

46

amounts to much higher concentrations. EfOM is usually quantified using sum parameters such

47

as dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The DOC concentrations of typical WWTP effluents range

48

from 4 to 15 mg/L.3, 10

49

Considering the time- and location-dependent heterogeneity of WWTP effluents, tests with

50

different WWTP samples are inherently lacking reproducibility. More standardized tests, e.g. by

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 26

51

using test solutions of known composition would clearly be beneficial in order to obtain time-

52

and location-independent, yet comparable results for different PAC products or PAC product

53

batches.11 Most importantly, such a test system should allow for inferring OMP removals

54

achievable with a PAC in real water (EfOM-containing, unknown composition) from OMP

55

removals in the test solution of known composition. Additionally, the test system should be as

56

simple and fast as possible, applicable for on-site quality controls by producers as well as

57

costumers or for estimating and adjusting PAC dosage. One approach to such a test system is the

58

use of defined solutions of surrogate competitors spiked with OMPs. Variable adsorption

59

competition on OMPs caused by EfOM of different WWTP effluents should be replicated by the

60

surrogate, e.g. by varying its initial concentration. In terms of a simple and fast test system, it

61

would as well be beneficial if the adsorptive removal of the competitor substance itself is easily

62

measurable and can be used to estimate corresponding OMP removals.

63

In this study, carbamazepine (CBZ) was chosen as an indicator substance for well-adsorbing

64

OMPs as it was proposed by Jekel et al.12 Swiss regulations also include CBZ as indicator

65

OMP.13 Batch experiments with PAC were then conducted to test the applicability of methyl

66

orange (MO) as a surrogate competitor. The azo dye MO is a common pH indicator with a pKa

67

of 3.47 in water14 and an aromatic compound of size similar to many OMPs. Aromatic and low

68

molecular weight compounds of the EfOM were pointed out as the main adsorption competitors

69

of OMPs.15 They cause direct competition for adsorption sites, whereas larger model molecules

70

would mainly induce pore blockage.16, 17

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

71

MATERIALS AND METHODS

72

Powdered activated carbons and water samples. Characteristics of the five utilized

73

commercial PACs are summarized in Table 1. Information provided by the respective suppliers

74

is denoted. pH of the point of zero charge (pHpzc) was determined according to Rivera-Utrilla et

75

al.18 except with contact times of 24h instead of 3h. The methods employed for determining

76

B.E.T. surface area, average pore diameter and particle size (d50, median diameter according to

77

cumulative particle volume) are described in section 2 of the supporting information along with

78

more detailed results.

79

Table 1. Powdered activated carbons and their characteristics

Abbr.

Product name

SAE

Norit SAE Super

HK

HK 950

CCP AP MP

Carbopal CCP 90D Carbopal AP AquaSorb MP 23

Manufacturer Cabotcorp, USA CSC, Germany Donau Carbon, Germany Donau Carbon, Germany Jacobi Carbons, Germany

B.E.T. Total pore Avg. pore Particle Point of Ash Source surface volume diameter size (d50) zero charge content* material* [m2/g] [cm3/g] [nm] [µm] (pHpzc) [%] Mixture

1114

0.78

2.81

26.6

11.37

-

Charcoal

1911

1.48

3.10

17.6

3.29