speciation in coal fly ashes and implication for REE extractability

Subscriber access provided by TULANE UNIVERSITY

Sustainability Engineering and Green Chemistry

Comprehensive understandings of rare earth element (REE) speciation in coal fly ashes and implication for REE extractability Pan Liu, Rixiang Huang, and Yuanzhi Tang Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 26 Mar 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 26, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Comprehensive understandings of rare earth element (REE) speciation in coal fly ashes

2

and implication for REE extractability

3 4

Pan Liu, Rixiang Huang, Yuanzhi Tang*

5 6

School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Dr,

7

Atlanta, GA 30332-0340, USA

8 9

* Corresponding author.

10

Email: [email protected]; Phone: 404-894-3814

11 12 13 14

Submit to

15


1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


16

Page 2 of 29

Abstract

17

In recent years, recovery of rare earth elements (REE) from coal fly ashes (CFAs) has

18

been considered as a promising resource recovery option. Yet, quantitative information on REE

19

speciation in CFAs and its correlation with REE extractability are not well established. This

20

study systematically investigated REE speciation-extractability relationship in four

21

representative CFA samples by employing multiple analytical and spectroscopic techniques

22

across micro to bulk scale and in combination with thermodynamic calculation. A range of

23

REE-bearing phases are identified, including REE oxides, REE phosphates, apatite, zircon, and

24

REE-bearing glass phase. REE can occur as discrete particles, as particles encapsulated in glass

25

phase, or distribute throughout the glass phase. Although certain discrepancies exist on the

26

REE speciation quantified by X-ray adsorption spectroscopy and acid leaching due to intrinsic

27

limitations of each method, both approaches show significant fractions of REE oxides, REE

28

phosphates, apatite, and REE-bearing Fe oxides. This study contributes to an in-depth

29

understanding of REE speciation-distribution-extractability relationship in CFAs and can help

30

identify uncertainties associated with the quantification of REE speciation. It also provides a

31

general methodology for future studies on REE speciation in complex environmental samples

32

and a knowledge basis for the development of effective REE recovery techniques.


Page 3 of 29

33


1. Introduction

34

Rare earth elements (including lanthanides and yttrium, as REE hereafter) are critical

35

for a wide range of high tech applications due to their unique physicochemical properties.1 The

36

growing importance of REE to technologies and economies and the potential risks of supply

37

disruptions have led both the United States (US) and the European Union to label REE as

38

“critical materials”.2,

39

importing REE in 2017.4 Over the recent years, there are great interests in developing

40

economically feasible and environmentally friendly approaches for domestic REE recovery.5-7

41

With this regard, coal combustion products such as coal fly ashes (CFAs) have recently

42

emerged as a promising REE source.8-11 In the US, around 45 Mt CFAs are generated

43

annually,10 with only 39% beneficially used and the rest discarded.12 On the other hand, REE

44

are enriched in the CFAs after coal burning.8, 13 With an average total concentration of REE in

45

CFAs at ~500 ppm, the annual value of REE derived from CFAs is estimated to be $4.3 billion

46

in the US.10 Thus, recovery of REE from CFAs is a promising waste recycling option that might

47

bring about significant environmental, economic, and societal benefits.

3

The US is currently a net importer of REE and spent $150 million

48

In order to develop cost effective and environmental friendly REE recovery techniques,

49

many critical issues need to be addressed,11 including the following two fundamental questions:

50

(1) the speciation of REE in CFAs, such as the chemical species and physical distribution

51

and/or association with other phases, and (2) the controlling factors on REE extractability.

52

Several previous studies14-16 have suggested that REE are dispersed throughout the amorphous

53

aluminosilicate glass phase, thus the glass fraction should be targeted for REE recovery from

54

CFAs. Other studies suggested the (predominant) presence of REE in phosphate (e.g.,

55

monazite)17, carbonate18, and/or silicate minerals (e.g., zircon)15. Such inconsistency might

56

result from the intrinsic heterogeneity of CFAs as well as the limitations of individual analytical

57

method. 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 4 of 29

58

Both micro- and bulk-scale analytical methods have been utilized to study the

59

correlation between REE speciation (e.g. chemical species and physical distribution) and

60

extractability in environmental samples, including CFAs. The main techniques used to study

61

REE speciation include scanning/transmission electron microscopy coupled with energy

62

dispersive X-ray spectroscopy15, 17-19, electron probe microanalysis19, laser ablation inductively

63

coupled plasma mass spectrometry15, 20, and synchrotron X-ray microscopy and spectroscopy21,

64

22.

65

and acid leaching26. Although these techniques can provide valuable information (e.g., REE

66

species, distribution, and extractability) at different spatial/temporal scale, they also possess

67

intrinsic limitations. For example, direct information on REE extractability can be provided by

68

sequential chemical extraction, but interpretation of the related mineral phases might be

69

problematic, because this empirical method might cause incomplete dissolution of desired

70

phases, concomitant dissolution of different phases, or alteration of the original phases. To

71

obtain a more complete picture and quantitative information of REE speciation in complex

72

matrices such as CFAs, comparison and cross-validation of information obtained by different

73

techniques are highly desired.

Extractability evaluations were mainly conducted using sequential chemical extraction23-25

74

The goals of this study are to comprehensively characterize and quantify REE species

75

and distribution in CFAs using complementary techniques across different spatial scales, and

76

to correlate the speciation information with REE extractability. Four representative CFA

77

samples were selected by taking into consideration of both CFA chemical composition and

78

main coal basins in the US. A systematic method was developed by employing techniques

79

across bulk to molecular scales, including chemical (acid leaching and sequential extraction),

80

mineralogical (X-ray diffraction), microscopic (scanning electron microscopy coupled with

81

energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy), and spectroscopic methods (synchrotron X-ray

82

adsorption spectroscopy). Based on the results obtained, the advantages and disadvantages of 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 29


83

each technique and controlling factors on REE extractability were evaluated. The results

84

contribute to an improved understanding of REE occurrence in CFAs and their extractability,

85

evaluate a general methodology for characterizing REE speciation in complex environmental

86

matrix, and provide a knowledge basis for the development of cost effective and

87

environmentally friendly REE recovery methods.

88 89

2. Materials and methods

90

2.1 Materials

91

The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C 618 defines two classes of

92

fly ashes based on chemical characterization: Class F CFAs (with SiO2 + Al2O3 + Fe2O3 ≥ 70

93

wt%) and Class C CFAs (with 50 wt% ≤ SiO2 + Al2O3 + Fe2O3 ≤ 70 wt%).27 Based on this

94

classification and the major coal basins in the US, four representative CFA samples were

95

selected for this study (Table 1), including two CFA samples (F-1 and C-1) from a local coal

96

fired power plant located in the southeastern US28 and two CFA samples from the National

97

Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (SRM-2690 as F-2 and SRM-2691 as C-2

98

hereinafter). Samples F-1 and F-2 are Class F CFAs and their feed coals are bituminous coal

99

from the Illinois Basin and subbituminous coal from a surface mine in Craig, CO, respectively.

100

Samples C-1 and C-2 are Class C CFAs and their feed coals are subbituminous coals from the

101

Powder River Basin (details in the Supporting Information SI, Table S1). A suite of REE

102

reference compounds (REE-organic complexes, REE oxides, REE carbonates, REE phosphates,

103

and natural REE-bearing minerals, etc) were obtained or synthesized using chemicals of ACS

104

grade or higher (details in Table S2). The synthesized and natural REE reference compounds

105

were confirmed by X-ray diffraction to be pure phases.

106 107

2.2. Composition analysis and chemical extraction of REE in CFAs 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 6 of 29

108

REE contents in CFAs were determined from total digestion29. Two types of chemical

109

extraction methods were used to assess the extractability of REE, including sequential

110

extraction and acid leaching. Sequential extraction was conducted following a previous

111

procedure.30 Briefly, four REE fractions are defined: (1) acid-soluble (Step-1, e.g., carbonates),

112

(2) reducible (Step-2, e.g., Fe-Mn oxides), (3) oxidizable (Step-3, e.g., organic matter and

113

sulfide), and (4) residue (e.g., silicates). For acid leaching, REE extractability was investigated

114

as a function of pH adjusted using HNO3 and NaOH. At desired pH, 0.2 g CFAs per 100-mL

115

H2O were reacted for three days under agitations at room temperature. At the end of each

116

chemical extraction step or acid leaching, REE concentration was analyzed using inductively

117

coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Details on total digestion, sequential extraction,

118

and ICP-MS measurement are in SI Text S1.

119 120

2.3 Mineralogical, microscopic, and spectroscopic analysis of CFAs

121

X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray

122

spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), micro X-ray fluorescence (μXRF) imaging and micro X-ray

123

absorption near edge structure spectroscopy (μXANES), and bulk XANES analyses were

124

conducted on the CFA samples. For XANES analyses, Nd and Y were chosen as representative

125

light REE (LREE, from La to Sm) and heavy REE (HREE, from Eu to Lu plus Y), respectively.

126

μXRF imaging and μXANES spectra of Y K-edge, Nd LIII-edge, and Nd LII-edge were

127

collected at Beamline 2-3 of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL, Menlo

128

Park, CA). Bulk XANES spectra were collected at Beamlines 5-BM-D at the Advanced Photon

129

Source (APS, Lemont, IL). Spectra of reference compounds were also collected for liner

130

combination fitting (LCF) analysis. Details on XRD, SEM-EDX, μXRF, and bulk/micro

131

XANES data collection and LCF analysis are in SI Text S2.

132 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 29


133

3. Results and discussion

134

3.1 Chemical and mineralogical characteristics of CFAs

135

The element contents of CFA samples are listed in Tables 1 and S1 and compared to

136

common CFAs from the major coal basins in the US. Samples F-1 and F-2 show chemical

137

composition typical of Class F CFAs that are enriched in SiO2 (55%), Al2O3 (25%), and Fe2O3

138

(5–12%), while samples C-1 and C-2 as Class C CFAs are relatively depleted in the above

139

elements but abundant in alkaline oxides (26–28% CaO and 1–5% MgO). Total REE content

140

in Class F CFAs is similar to that of Class C CFAs (250–320 ppm), and comparable to common

141

CFAs in the US (Table S1). REE patterns of the four CFA samples normalized (with subscript

142

N) by the Upper Continental Crust (UCC, representing the natural REE background)31 are

143

shown in Fig. S1, which are in line with the general REE patterns of CFAs. REE are M-type

144

enriched (LaN/SmN < 1 and GdN/LuN > 1)8 in both Class F and C CFAs without obvious Ce

145

anomaly (defined as 𝐶𝑒 ∗ = 2𝐶𝑒𝑁 (𝐿𝑎𝑁 + 𝑃𝑟𝑁)). Samples C-1, C-2, and F-2 are characterized

146

with positive Eu anomaly (𝐸𝑢 ∗ = 2𝐸𝑢𝑁 (𝑆𝑚𝑁 + 𝐺𝑑𝑁)), while sample F-1 does not show

147

evident anomaly.

148

The mineralogical composition of CFAs was investigated by XRD (Fig. S2).

149

Crystalline phases identified in Class F CFAs include quartz (SiO2), mullite (Al6Si2O13),

150

hematite (Fe2O3), and magnetite (Fe3O4). Class C CFAs have a more complex mineralogy, with

151

quartz, anhydrite (CaSO4), tricalcium aluminate (Ca3Al2O6), lime (CaO), and periclase (MgO)

152

being identified. A broad hump at around 20–30 2 suggests the presence of amorphous

153

aluminosilicate glass, a common major component (50–80 wt%) in CFAs.32 SEM analysis

154

observed different morphologies of CFA particles, with the predominance presence of

155

spherical and cenospherical particles ranging at 1–100 μm (Fig. S3). Such morphological

156

features are typical for CFAs due to particle melting and decomposition during coal burning

157

process.33 In addition, considerable amounts of fine particles (e.g., Fe oxides) were found to be 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


158

Page 8 of 29

embedded within glass phase in both Class F and C CFAs (Figs. S3 and S4).

159 160

3.2 REE speciation by SEM-EDX

161

SEM-EDX observed two types of REE occurrence in CFAs, including pure REE

162

phosphates and minor REE in lime and zircon. Fig. 1a shows a REE phosphate particle (~30-

163

μm size) that is enriched in LREE, while the one in Fig. 1b (~10-μm size) is enriched in HREE

164

with close association with aluminosilicate glass. These two REE phosphate particles might be

165

monazite/rhabdophane (LREE-enriched phosphate) and xenotime/churchite (HREE-enriched

166

phosphate), respectively. Monazite and xenotime are anhydrous phosphate minerals, while

167

rhabdophane and churchite are hydrated phosphate minerals. It is difficult to differentiate them

168

by SEM-EDX. REE phosphates have also been identified previously using transmission

169

electron microscopy17, 34 and electron probe microanalysis19. A lime (CaO) particle containing

170

minor REE (REE oxide content < 0.5 wt%) is shown in Fig. 1c. This phase contains minor

171

HREE and its spherical shape suggests that it might be relics of REE-bearing CaCO3 after

172

burning. Both REE-bearing CaCO3 and CaO have been previously identified.18, 19 A zircon

173

(ZrSiO4) particle (REE oxide content < 0.3 wt%) is shown in Fig. 1d, which is encapsulated in

174

glass phase. Although zircon is relatively abundant in the CFAs, only a portion of observed

175

zircon particles (4 out of 16) contains EDX-detectable REE. Other potential REE-bearing

176

phases, such as apatite19 and glass phase14, were observed but with no REE detected by EDX.

177

An overview of the REE speciation observed by SEM-EDX reveals three critical

178

features regarding REE occurrence in CFAs (Table S3). First, different phases might

179

preferentially

180

monazite/rhabdophane, and HREE in xenotime/churchite, lime, and zircon (Fig. 1). This

181

phenomenon might be due to the gradually decreasing cation radii of REE with increasing

182

atomic number (i.e., lanthanum contraction), which changes the compatibility of individual

accommodate

LREE

or

HREE.

LREE

are

more

enriched

in


Page 9 of 29


183

REE element for a specific mineral phase. Second, as shown in Figs. 1 and S5, REE-bearing

184

phases can occur as discrete particles or be closely associated with glass phase (at the edge or

185

totally encapsulated). The close association of REE-bearing phases with glass phase is likely

186

due to the capture of REE-bearing phases during glass cooling and agglomeration21, and it has

187

also been noticed by several previous studies (e.g., ref.17, 21). Third, REE-bearing phases might

188

be subjected to decomposition during combustion. Although REE phosphates and zircon are

189

typically thought to be stable even at high temperature (e.g., ref19), Fig. S6 shows

190

decomposition characteristics of REE phosphates (particle shattering) and zircon (holes and

191

melting features), as compared to Figs. 1a and 1d, respectively.

192 193

3.3 REE speciation by synchrotron microscopy and spectroscopy

194

Characteristics of REE reference compounds. Y XANES spectra of reference

195

compounds are plotted in Figs. S7. Spectra of Y2O3, Y-churchite (YPO4·H2O), apatite

196

(Ca5(PO4)3(OH, F)), REE-bearing calcite (CaCO3), monazite ((Ce, Th, La, Nd)PO4), xenotime

197

((Y, Dy)PO4), zircon (ZrSiO4), and REE-bearing glass all show a peak at 17056.5 eV and a

198

shoulder at 17066 eV, but the relative intensities are different, and with additional features at

199

17080–17140 eV. These different spectral features reflect different structures and local

200

coordination environments of the REE reference compounds (such as the first shell

201

coordination, summarized in Table S2). On the other hand, Y spectra of Y3+(aq), Y-tengerite

202

(Y2(CO3)3·2-3H2O), bastnäsite ((Ce, La, Nd)CO3(OH, F)), REE-bearing hematite (Fe2O3), and

203

REE-organic complexes are similar to each other, showing a single peak at around 17056.5 eV,

204

although the peak position is slightly right-shifted for Y3+(aq) and left-shifted for bastnäsite.

205

Nd spectra were not collected for some reference compounds (e.g., bastnäsite and

206

monazite) due to interference of Ce LII-edge signal on Nd LIII-edge and Sm LIII-edge signal on

207

Nd LII-edge. For reference compounds with Nd spectra obtained, their LIII- and LII-edge spectra 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 10 of 29

208

are generally similar in appearance with a characteristic intense main peak (Fig. S8), making it

209

difficult to distinguish REE speciation based on Nd XANES. Thus, Y was used as the primary

210

“probe” for characterizing REE speciation. Although some Y spectra of REE-reference

211

compounds are similar, giving the possibility that some subtle differences might still be helpful

212

in differentiating REE speciation, all thirteen Y reference spectra were used for the linear

213

combination fitting (LCF).

214

μXRF and μXANES analyses. Representative µXRF maps were plotted in Fig. 2 and

215

SI Figs. S9 and S10. Most Y hotspots observed have a particle size of 60%)

229

at those hotspots by LCF. Five hotspots are identified as REE oxides (Table S4) and they have

230

a relatively smaller particle size (generally 3.5 (REE oxides, carbonates)

pH 3.51.5 (apatite)

pH

speciation in coal fly ashes and implication for REE extractability

Recommend Documents