Subscriber access provided by University of Florida | Smathers Libraries
Article
Spectroscopic indicators for cytotoxicity of chlorinated and ozonated effluents from wastewater stabilization ponds and activated sludge Nedal Massalha, Shengkun Dong, Michael J Plewa, Mikhail Borisover, and Thanh H. Nguyen Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05510 • Publication Date (Web): 23 Jan 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 23, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
161x115mm (96 x 96 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Spectroscopic indicators for cytotoxicity of chlorinated and ozonated effluents
2
from wastewater stabilization ponds and activated sludge
3
Nedal Massalha,†⊥* Shengkun Dong,†⊥‡ Michael J. Plewa,§‡ Mikhail Borisover,□
4
Thanh H. Nguyen†‡
5 6
Manuscript submitted to Environmental Science & Technology
7 8
†Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
9
§ Department of Crop Sciences,
10
‡Safe Global Water Institute,
11
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States □
12 13
Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, The Volcani Center, A.R.O., P.O.B. 15159, RishonLeZion7505101, Israel
14 15 16
Word count = 3989 + 2100 (figures) = 6089
17 18 19 20
*
21
Nedal Massalha; e-mail:
[email protected] Author to whom correspondence should be addressed:
1 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Page 2 of 32
Page 3 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
22
ABSTRACT
23
We investigated chronic mammalian cell cytotoxicity of wastewaters from four sources and their
24
optical spectroscopic properties with or without chlorination or ozonation. Samples from effluents
25
of activated sludge, nitrification tower, facultative waste stabilization pond, and maturation waste
26
stabilization pond were either chlorinated or ozonated. The wastewater samples were analyzed for
27
fluorescence excitation emission matrix, specific fluorescence index (SFI), and specific UV
28
absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA). Before and after disinfection the wastewater samples were
29
quantitatively analyzed for in vitro mammalian cell cytotoxicity. We found that the organic
30
extracts from the ozonated samples induced lower cytotoxicity responses than those from the
31
chlorinated or the non-disinfected samples. To develop correlations between SFI, SUVA, and
32
cytotoxicity, we analyzed 21 independent samples. Significant linear correlations found among
33
these samples suggest that under the tested conditions, cytotoxicity was preferentially influenced
34
by the fluorescence and SUVA of their composite organic agents. These two spectroscopic
35
parameters may be used as indicators for the potential toxicity of non-disinfected, ozonated, or
36
chlorinated municipal wastewater.
37
2 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Environmental Science & Technology
38
INTRODUCTION
39
Wastewater reuse is an important component of sustainable wastewater management practices
40
worldwide.1 Because of severe limits to fresh water resources, reuse of treated wastewater for
41
irrigation has increased.2 In many regions of the USA the availability of fresh water for irrigation
42
has been diminished because of climate change and droughts.3–5 Employing treated wastewater for
43
agriculture irrigation reduces the demand on fresh source waters and enhances soil enrichment
44
with nutrients from the effluents.6–8
45
Wastewater for safe reuse demands that effluents be disinfected.9 Wastewater effluents contain
46
complex organic compounds from influent organics and biodegradation byproducts formed during
47
treatment processes.10 Pathogens can be inactivated by disinfecting the effluent wastewater;
48
however, toxic disinfection byproducts (DBPs) are generated.11 The formation of uncharacterized
49
DBPs is a public health concern
50
wastewater.17–19 Chlorination is the most commonly used disinfectant for water and wastewater.20
51
Ozone, an alternative disinfectant to chlorine, can inactivate even chlorine-resistant pathogens in
52
drinking water 20,21 and lower the toxicity of wastewaters.22–24
12–16
and some DBPs are more toxic than the organics in the
53
Measurements of UV absorption and fluorescence of treated wastewater have been found to
54
relate to the occurrence of DBPs. For example, specific absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA)25,26 and
55
fluorescence index (FI)27,28 were used as surrogate measurements for dissolved organic matter
56
(DOM) aromaticity and molecular weight to predict the formation of DBPs. Fluorescence of DOM
57
in treated water was also linked to the formation of chlorinated DBPs.29 The three-dimensional
58
fluorescence excitation emission-matrices (EEMs) were used as a basis for fingerprint information
59
and on-line monitoring of DOM, with the aim of predicting DBP formation potential during water
3 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Page 4 of 32
Page 5 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
60
treatment.30–32 Several methods were used to quantitatively analyze the EEMs, for example
61
conventional peak-picking, regional integration, and multivariate data analysis such as the parallel
62
factor method (PARAFAC).33–35 Changes in EEMs fluorescence intensities after oxidation were
63
related to DBPs formation.29,36 While the links between UV absorption and fluorescence of
64
disinfected wastewater with DBP formation have been established, the potential correlations
65
between mammalian cell cytotoxicity and these commonly measured properties of the wastewater
66
have not been explored.
67
To fill this knowledge gap, the objectives of this study were to (i) examine the relationship
68
between mammalian cell cytotoxicity and fluorescence indices, and mammalian cell cytotoxicity
69
and UV absorbance properties, and (ii) establish correlations, if any, between mammalian cell
70
cytotoxicity vs. fluorescence indices and UV absorbance properties, two commonly measured
71
water quality parameters, in different municipal wastewater effluents before and after disinfection
72
by chlorination or ozonation. To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate that
73
cytotoxicity of municipal wastewater can be inferred from commonly measured fluorescence and
74
UV-absorbance spectral indicators.
75
MATERIALS AND METHODS
76
Sampling and Characterization of Wastewaters. Four sources of treated municipal wastewaters
77
were sampled in two wastewater treatment sites in Illinois, USA: (i) the effluent of a secondary
78
clarifier, which is part of an activated sludge treatment plant (ASE), (ii) the effluent of a
79
nitrification tower (NIT), which was fed by a blend of trickling filter and activated sludge effluents
80
(iii) the effluent of an aerated waste stabilization pond (AWSP), and (iv) the effluent of a
81
maturation waste stabilization pond (MWSP). AWSP and MWSP were from the same treatment
4 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Environmental Science & Technology
82
plant that employed passive ponds. A 50 L ASE sample was taken from the effluent of a secondary
83
clarifier. A volume of 30 L was taken from the effluent of the nitrification tower. Two 50 L
84
samples, one each from AWSP and MWSP, two ponds in series, were taken directly from the
85
upper 30 cm of the ponds’ surface. The typical hydraulic retention time of ASE is 12 to 18 h, while
86
the typical hydraulic retention times are between 4 to 8 days for AWSP and 30 to 40 days for
87
MWSP. All samples were transported and stored in the dark at 4°C in 20 L polyethylene (PE)
88
containers until extraction and analysis. Prior to filtration and disinfection, the source samples
89
were characterized by the total chemical oxygen demand (COD) using the HACH (Loveland, CO)
90
low range COD digestion vials according to USEPA Reactor Digestion Method,37 and by the
91
volatile suspended solids (VSS).38 Before disinfection and concentration of the effluents, in order
92
to remove coarse particles, the wastewater samples were passed through Grade 1:11 µm
93
Whatman® filters pre-washed with deionized water. The filtrate was further transferred through
94
1.6 µm Millipore glass fiber filters followed by 0.45 µm pre-washed nitrocellulose membranes.
95
After filtration the samples were analyzed for total organic carbon (TOC) by a Shimadzu TOC
96
analyzer (Columbia, MD) and ammonia nitrogen using the HACH Salicylate kit.39 The measured
97
wastewater parameters are presented in the supporting information (Table 1SI).
98
Disinfection Experiments. Chlorination and ozonation disinfection experiments were conducted
99
with the 0.45 µm filtrate of MWSP, AWSP, ASE, and NIT samples. The filtered samples of
100
MWSP, AWSP, and ASE were given the acronyms MWSP1, AWSP1, and ASE1. Chlorination
101
was conducted in multiple US EPA approved 4 L amber glass bottles. A volume of 1.85 mL of
102
sodium hypochlorite solution (Ricca Chemical, TX) with 27 g/L free chlorine was added to each
103
4 L wastewater sample, yielding an applied chlorine concentration of 12.5 mg/L as Cl2.
104
Preliminary experiments were done to guarantee the presence of free chlorine after 30 min reaction
5 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Page 6 of 32
Page 7 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
105
time using the US EPA DPD Method with the HACH kit (Table 2SI).40 In brief, initial free chlorine
106
concentrations of 4, 8, 12.5, and 14 mg/L as Cl2 were tested in 20 mL wastewater samples for free
107
residual chlorine after 30 min reaction. The bottles were sealed, kept in the dark, and stirred with
108
magnetic bars for 30 min, after which the samples were measured for free chlorine and quenched
109
with 1 mL of 0.1 M sodium thiosulfate (E K Industries, IL) to each 4 L wastewater sample. As
110
described in the previous studies,22,23 ozonation experiments were conducted in a 10 L glass reactor
111
agitated by a magnetic bar. Ozone was produced by a micro-channel plasma ozone generator (EP
112
Purification Inc., IL) fed by an oxygen concentrator (Airsep, NY). The ozone-containing gas was
113
bubbled through a stone diffuser into cold, deionized, distilled water (4°C) for at least 15 min. The
114
aqueous ozone concentration was detected continuously with an ultraviolet spectrometer
115
(Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, IN) at λ = 258 nm (ε = 3000 M−1 cm−1).41 The ozonated water
116
was then quickly mixed with the wastewater samples to produce an applied ozone concentration
117
of 3 mg/L. The reactor was subsequently capped and the ozonated samples were incubated for 24
118
h to ensure the absence of residual ozone.
119
Sample Concentration. Dissolved wastewater organics were adsorbed and concentrated by
120
passing the wastewater samples through a chromatography column with a mixture of 110 mL each
121
of XAD-2 (Amberlite XAD-2, Sigma-Aldrich, MO) and XAD-8 (Supelite DAX-8, Sigma-Aldrich,
122
MO) resins. For 72 h, the resins were Soxhlet-cleaned with spectroscopic grade (Fisher Optima)
123
methanol, followed by ethyl acetate and again with methanol. Details regarding the resins Soxhlet
124
cleaning, conditioning, and the extracting of the adsorbed organics are provided in a previous
125
study42,43 and in the SI. The XAD-2/XAD-8 resin mixture was packed in glass columns. The resin
126
packing was conditioned by acid (1N HCl) and base (1N NaOH) before the water samples were
127
passed through the columns. After passing the acidified samples (40-50 mL H2SO4 per 2L of
6 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Environmental Science & Technology
128
sample) through the columns, the organics were eluted with Optima grade ethyl acetate (Fisher
129
Scientific, PA), which was vacuum evaporated and dried with nitrogen gas. The organics were
130
dissolved in ACS reagent grade dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Fisher Scientific, PA) to a
131
concentration factor of 1×105 fold.
132
Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells. The Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line AS52 clone 11-4-2
133
was maintained on glass culture plates in Ham’s F12 medium containing 5% fetal bovine serum
134
(FBS), 1% antibiotics (100 U/mL sodium penicillin G, 100 µg/mL streptomycin sulfate, 0.25
135
µg/mL amphotericin B in 0.85% saline), and 1% glutamine at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of
136
5% CO2.44
137
CHO Cell Cytotoxicity Assay. The CHO cell chronic cytotoxicity assay measures the reduction
138
in cell density as a function of the wastewater sample concentrates over a period of approximately
139
three to four cell divisions (72 h), using an assay we previously developed for the analysis of
140
individual chemicals as well as for complex water mixtures.15,23,45 Flat-bottom, tissue culture 96-
141
well microplates were employed; 4 replicate wells were prepared for each concentration of each
142
water sample extract. Eight wells were reserved for the blank control consisting of 200 µL of F12
143
+ 5% FBS. The negative control consisted of 8 wells containing 100 µL of a titered CHO cell
144
suspension (3×104 cells/mL) plus 100 µL F12 + 5% FBS. The wells for the remaining columns
145
contained 3,000 CHO cells, F12 + 5% FBS, and a known concentration of wastewater organic
146
extract (total volume per well = 200 µL). To prevent sample evaporation or cross contamination
147
between wells due to evaporation, a sheet of sterile AlumnaSeal™ (RPI Corporation, IL) was
148
pressed over the wells before the microplate was covered. To distribute the cells uniformly, the
149
microplate was placed on a rocking platform for 10 min, and then placed in a humidified tissue
150
culture incubator at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 72 h. After incubation, each well was gently aspirated, fixed 7 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Page 8 of 32
Page 9 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
151
in 100% methanol for 10 min, and stained for 10 min with a 1% crystal violet solution in 50%
152
methanol. The microplate was gently rinsed in tap water, inverted, and tapped dry on paper towels.
153
50 μL of DMSO/methanol (3:1 v/v) was added to each well for 10 min before the microplate was
154
analyzed in a microplate reader for absorbance at 595 nm. The blank-corrected absorbance value
155
of the negative controls (cells with medium only) was set at 100%. The absorbance for each
156
treatment group was converted into a percentage of the negative controls. A concentration-
157
response curve was generated for each wastewater sample extract, and a regression analysis was
158
conducted for each curve. The LC50 values were calculated from each regression analysis, where
159
the LC50 represents the concentration factor that induced a 50% reduction in cell density as
160
compared to the concurrent negative controls. A DMSO control demonstrated that no significant
161
cytotoxicity was induced throughout the solvent concentrations used in these experiments.
162
Spectroscopic Analysis. The fluorescence EEMs were measured at room temperature with a
163
Shimadzu RF-5301PC spectrofluorometer employing a quartz cuvette with 4 × 1.0 cm windows.
164
The slit widths for excitation and emission were 5 nm. Excitation wavelengths varied from 250 to
165
400 nm with increments of 10 nm, and emission wavelengths varied between 280 to 550 nm with
166
1 nm increments. Samples for EEM analysis were diluted with fluorescence-free Milli-Q deionized
167
water to ensure that solution absorbance did not exceed 0.1 cm-1 at wavelengths ≥ 250 nm, thus
168
minimizing the inner filter effect.46 The pH of the filtered samples was within the 8.3 ± 0.2 range.
169
The dilution Milli-Q water was used as the blank for fluorescence EEM to be subtracted from the
170
sample EEM. No fluorescence was detected in Milli-Q water after passing through pre-washed
171
filters.
172
For quantitative analysis of the EEM plots, a peak picking algorithm-based approach was used
173
to determine the maximum peak intensities within pre-defined regions of interest.26,27 Four specific 8 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Environmental Science & Technology
174
regions of interest were chosen in excitation emission wavelength boundaries as defined
175
previously:47 humic acid (HA)-like at excitation wavelengths of 280 to 370 nm and emission
176
wavelengths of 400 to 480nm; fulvic acid (FA)-like at excitation wavelengths of 250 to 260 and
177
emission wavelengths of 400 to 460 nm; tryptophan (protein)-like (TP) at excitation wavelengths
178
of 260 to 280 nm and emission wavelengths of 330 to 380 nm; tyrosine (protein)- like (TY) at
179
excitation wavelengths of 260 to 280 nm and emission wavelengths of 290 to 330 nm. Determined
180
EEMs of fluorescence were multiplied by a dilution factor used for sample preparation. The
181
fluorescence index (FI) was taken as the ratio of emission intensities at 470 nm and 520 nm for an
182
excitation at 370 nm.27 The specific fluorescence index (SFI) was calculated as the ratio of FI to
183
the corresponding dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Absorbance at 254 nm (Abs254) was obtained
184
in a 1.0 cm quartz cuvette using an ultraviolet-visible spectrometer (Shimadzu UV-2450). The
185
absorbance value (cm−1) was expressed as the ratio of optical density to optical length (1.0 cm).
186
SUVA, determined by the ratio of UV254 to DOC, is an indicator of the presence of aromatic
187
components in organic matter.26 The values of SUVA were reported in liter per milligram of C per
188
meter (Abs254/DOC × 100).
189
Statistics. The LC50 values were converted into cytotoxicity index values CTI = LC50-1 × 103 for
190
the ANOVA test statistic to determine significant differences amongst the toxicity of the
191
wastewater samples. The statistical power was maintained at ≥ 0.8 at α = 0.05. The values of the
192
DOC-normalized cytotoxicity index (NCTI) were calculated by dividing the mean CTI values by
193
the corresponding DOC of the wastewater sample. Possible correlations between the NCTI and
194
spectroscopic properties were evaluated using the Pearson Product-Moment test (OriginPro, MA).
195
For each correlation, a Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficient (r) was evaluated to assess
196
possible correlation. All tests were performed at a 95% confidence level (α = 0.05).
9 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Page 10 of 32
Page 11 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
197
Additional samples for correlations: To expand the samples size for the correlations of NCTI
198
values vs. SFI and SUVA, nine samples of municipal wastewater were used together with the 12
199
samples from the four different sources to establish the correlations between cytotoxicity and
200
SUVA or fluorescence indices. These samples were taken from different locations and sampling
201
seasons that included early spring, early summer, peak summer, and late fall, encompassing a wide
202
range of water qualities and temperatures. The nine additional samples included four chlorinated
203
and ozonated unfiltered effluents from a facultative waste stabilization pond, and a maturation
204
waste stabilization pond (named chlorinated MWSP2, ozonated MWSP2, chlorinated AWSP2,
205
and ozonated AWSP2), two activated sludge samples taken at different times (named ASE2 and
206
ASE3), and one ozonated sample of ASE3, and two non-disinfected and chlorinated municipal
207
activated sludge effluents in Israel (named IS and chlorinated IS). All 21 samples were processed
208
using the same protocols.
209
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
210
Fluorescence Characteristics of the Studied Wastewater before and after Chlorination or
211
Ozonation. Fluorescence EEMs of the source samples are presented in Figure 1a, 1d,1g, and 1j.
212
The four key fluorescence peaks indicating the presence of the fluorophores in HA, FA, TP, and
213
TY were resolved. For source wastewaters, despite having the highest DOC, MWSP1 had lower
214
fluorescence peaks for all organic fractions than those of AWSP1, ASE1, or NIT (Figure 1a, 1d,
215
1g, 1j and Table 3SI). Comparing non-disinfected wastewater samples from AWSP1 with those
216
from ASE1, the fluorescence peaks of HA, FA, and TP were lower by 53, 17, and 33%,
217
respectively, and higher by 26% in TY (Figure 1d, 1g, and Table 3SI). The fluorescence peaks of
218
HA and FA in the non-disinfected ASE1 and NIT were very close. TP and TY in ASE1 and NIT
219
were also slightly different (Figure 1g, 1j, and Table 3SI). For the MWSP1 sample, chlorination 10 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Environmental Science & Technology
220
reduced the fluorescence peaks of HA and FA by 24 and 18%, respectively, and increased TP and
221
TY by 22 and 16%, respectively (Figure 1a, 1b, and Table 4SI). In contrast, ozonation lowered the
222
concentrations of all fluorophores, as compared to those in the non-disinfected MWSP1, by 42,
223
37, 69, and 77% for HA, FA, TP, and TY, respectively (Figure 1a, 1c, and Table 4SI). For both
224
chlorinated and ozonated AWSP1 samples, the fluorescence peaks in the FA region decreased by
225
28 and 34% after chlorination and ozonation as compared to the non-disinfected AWSP1 sample,
226
respectively (Figure 1d, 1e, 1f, and Table 4SI). Chlorination reduced the fluorescence peaks in the
227
regions of TP, TY, and HA of the AWSP sample by 29, 54, and 30%, respectively, while ozonation
228
reduced these fluorescence peaks by 38, 63, and 39%, respectively (Figure 1d, 1e, 1f, and Table
229
4SI). Comparing non-disinfected ASE1 sample to chlorinated ASE1 sample, the latter showed
230
about 36% reduction of the fluorescence peak in the regions of TP and TY, and about 56% for the
231
HA, while ozonation lowered the fluorescence peaks of TP and TY by about 59% and by about
232
47% for FA fluorescence peak (Figure 1g, 1h, 1i, and Table 4SI). For the NIT sample, chlorination
233
reduced the fluorescence peaks of HA, FA, and TP by 32, 18, and 27%, respectively, and increased
234
TY by 17% (Figure 1j, 1h, and Table 4SI). In contrast, ozonation lowered the concentrations of all
235
fluorophores, as compared to those in the non-disinfected NIT, by 79, 65, 54, and 67% for HA,
236
FA, TP, and TY, respectively (Figure 1j, 1i, and Table 4SI).The reduction in wastewater
237
fluorescence after chlorination is in agreement with the observation reported in the previous
238
studies.29,48–50 Possible reasons for the increase in the intensity of fluorescence peak of TP and TY
239
for chlorinated MWSP1, and TY for chlorinated NIT (Table 4SI), after chlorination may include
240
both formation of fluorescent DBPs and a selective degradation of naturally present quenchers of
241
organic matter fluorescence. Consistent with previous observations,51–53 ozonation reduced the
242
fluorescence intensities of major fluorophores, especially protein-like substances in all samples.
11 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Page 12 of 32
Page 13 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
243
The observed changes in the EEMs of fluorescence caused by chlorination or ozonation suggest
244
breakdown or alteration of the organics in the treated wastewaters and perhaps the generation of
245
DBPs.53,54
246
CHO Cell Cytotoxicity of Concentrated Effluents. As shown in Figure 2, for non-disinfected
247
samples, ASE1 and AWSP1 have lower cytotoxicity than NIT (P < 0.05, Table 5SI). These three
248
samples were more cytotoxic than MWSP1 samples (P < 0.05, Figure 2, 3, and Table 5SI). The
249
obtained higher cytotoxicity of NIT, compared to the other two secondary effluents AWSP1 and
250
ASE1, is likely because the NIT sample was taken from a nitrification tower fed by a blend of
251
activated sludge and trickling filter effluents. The measured higher cytotoxicity of NIT, compared
252
to the other two secondary effluents AWSP1 and ASE1, is likely due to the fact that the NIT
253
sample was taken from a nitrification tower fed by a blend of activated sludge and trickling filter
254
effluents (Table 1SI). The significant 1.74-fold lower cytotoxicity of MWSP1 compared to
255
AWSP1 (P < 0.05, Table 5SI) indicates that the maturation treatment process reduced the available
256
cytotoxic materials in the wastewater (Figure 2a, 2b, and 3). For disinfected wastewaters,
257
chlorinated samples generated at least 1.1-fold higher cytotoxicity than the non-disinfected
258
controls for ASE1, AWSP1, and NIT, while chlorination of MWSP1 did not change the
259
cytotoxicity (P > 0.05, Figure 3 and Table 5SI). Consistent with previous studies,23,31 ozonated
260
samples were at least 1.6-fold less cytotoxic than the chlorinated samples (Figure 3), and were
261
significantly less cytotoxic than the non-disinfected controls (P < 0.05, Table 5SI). AWSP1 that
262
expressed the highest reduction in cytotoxicity after ozonation (2.4-fold decrease) showed the
263
lowest increase in cytotoxicity after chlorination (1.1-fold increase).
12 Environment ACS Paragon Plus
Environmental Science & Technology
264
MWSP1, the wastewater possessing the lowest cytotoxicity but the highest DOC among the
265
non-disinfected samples, produced the least cytotoxic chlorinated or ozonated wastewaters
266
compared to the disinfected AWSP1, ASE1, and NIT samples (Figure 3).
267
The increase in toxicity after chlorination is in agreement with a previous study,55 likely due to
268
the reactions between chlorine and the organics in wastewaters that produced a number of
269
halogenated aliphatic or aromatic compounds. Ozonation not only efficiently removes wastewater
270
contaminants but also produces byproducts such as aldehydes, ketones, and organic acids56–59 that
271
are in general less toxic than the precursors in wastewater or the halogenated DBPs from
272
chlorination. Our observation that ozonationled to a lower toxicity compared to chlorination is
273
likely a result of the increased degradation of toxic organic compounds in the studied wastewaters
274
by ozone and increased formation of toxic halogenated DBPs with chlorination. These different
275
trends observed for chlorination and ozonation suggest that between the two alternative
276
disinfectants, ozone is a better candidate to minimize cytotoxicity.
277
Correlation Analyses between CHO Cell Cytotoxicity and Spectroscopic Indicators. Linear
278
and positive correlations were found among the DOC-normalized cytotoxicity index (NCTI)
279
values of the non-disinfected, chlorinated, or ozonated samples and SFI values (Figure 4a, 4b, 4c,
280
and Table 6SI). For a given SFI value, the NCTI ascending rank order was as follows: ozonated