Spectroscopic investigation of the electrosynthesis ... - ACS Publications

give important mechanistic insights into this reaction and open up possibilities to an alternative process for the produc- ... ty savings up to 30% 3...
0 downloads 6 Views 550KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF SCIENCES PHILADELPHIA

Spectroscopic investigation of the electrosynthesis of diphenyl carbonate from CO and phenol on gold electrodes Marta Costa Figueiredo, Vinh Trieu, Stefanie Eiden, Jan Heijl, and Marc T.M. Koper ACS Catal., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b04204 • Publication Date (Web): 06 Mar 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 7, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

Spectroscopic investigation of the electrosynthesis of diphenyl carbonate from CO and phenol on gold electrodes Marta C. Figueiredoa*, Vinh Trieub, Stefanie Eidenb, Jan Heijlc, Marc T. M. Koper a*

a

Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands, Email: [email protected] b Covestro Deutschland AG, 51365 Leverkusen, Germany c Covestro NV, 2040 Antwerp, Belgium

ABSTRACT: In this work we study the synthesis of diphenyl carbonate (DPC) from phenol and CO on gold electrodes studied by means of in situ Fourier Transformed infra-red spectroscopy (FTIR). The results show that, on gold electrodes the formation of DPC is observed at potentials as low as 0.4 V vs Ag/AgCl together with the formation of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) from the carbonylation of methanol that was used as solvent. The spectroelectrochemical results also suggest that the formation of DPC takes place by the replacement of the methoxy groups from DMC with phenoxy groups from phenol and not directly by the carbonylation of phenol. Although this transesterification process is known to occur with heterogeneous catalysts, it has not been reported under electrochemical conditions. These are interesting findings, since the direct DPC production by carbonylation of phenol to DPC is usually performed with Pd-based catalysts. With this reaction scheme of transesterification taking place under electrochemical conditions, other non-Pd catalysts could be used as well for onestep DPC production from phenol and CO. These findings give important mechanistic insights into this reaction and open up possibilities to an alternative process for the production of DPC.

Keywords: carbonylation, methanol, electrosynthesis, diphenyl carbonate, Au catalysts The use of electrochemistry in the synthesis of organic molecules is a very promising methodology for future industrial applications. With the help of electrochemistry it is possible to fulfil several requirements for the development of environmental friendly industrial processes. One of the main contemporary advantages of electrochemistry is the use of sustainable energy utilizing electricity produced by renewable sources like wind or solar 1. Electrochemical reactions typically take place at room temperature and the combination of low temperature and accurate control of the potential should in principle allow the selectivity of the process to be driven towards a specific desirable product. Moreover, electrocatalysts are generally “heterogeneous” electrode materials that will facilitate the separation and reuse of the cata-

lyst. Successful examples of electrochemical processes in industry can be found in the Chlor-Alkali industry, and in aluminum or adiponitrile production. 2 These established electrochemical processes are undergoing constant improvement. A prominent example in chlorine electrolysis is the implementation of gas diffusion electrodes into aqueous electrolysis in 2003, enabling the use of gaseous reactant oxygen under high current density with electricity savings up to 30% 3. There is great potential for electrochemical methods to help in the development of other green alternatives for the chemical industry, especially that with gas diffusion electrodes the choice of reactants is now extended to gaseous reactants. Diphenyl carbonate (DPC) is a key material in the solvent-free production of polycarbonates 4 through the transesterification of DPC with bisphenol A (BPA). However, the synthesis procedure takes place in several steps involving a high number of reactants and very particular conditions. First, dimethyl carbonate (DMC) is prepared via oxidative carbonylation of methanol, and then diphenyl carbonate (DPC) is synthesized from a two-step reaction consisting of transesterification of DMC with phenol into methyl phenyl carbonate (MPC) followed by disproportionation of MPC into DMC and DPC. Finally, DPC is reacted by transesterification with BPA in the melt phase, resulting in the formation of polycarbonate precursors 4-5. The world demand of polycarbonate raised up to 5 million tons in 2015 6, making of DPC a high value building block to the chemical industry. The direct synthesis of DPC will bring several advantages such as reduced energy consumption and environmental benefits and sustainability 5. The oxidative carbonylation of phenol has been the focus of intensive research in the past by the main polycarbonate producing companies, because the reaction pathway is very simple and uses commonly available chemicals. However the expensive catalyst system with homogeneous Pd and a series of highly corrosive co-catalysts prevented industrial implementation of the technology 7-8. The focus of the industrial research into DPC synthesis moved on to reaction pathways using detours and more exotic raw materials 9 , but electrochemistry can present several advantages when compared with chemical oxidative carbonylation. First, the reaction temperature (that is between 100 to 200 C for oxidative carbonylation6) can be decreased to room temperature without loss in efficiency or selectivity, which will represent significant savings in terms of energy losses and

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

higher energy efficiencies at industrial level. Secondly, the oxidation reaction occurs at the electrode and there is no need for an oxidative gas, avoiding the use of explosive mixtures such as O2 and CO. Moreover, with the appropriate catalyst, the usage of an inorganic cocatalyst (used in oxidative carbonylation to increase the reaction yield) can be avoided, reducing the number of chemical components in the process. The electrochemical carbonylation of phenol (PhOH) with CO is thus one of the appealing alternative routes towards this goal. With gas diffusion electrodes for inclusion of CO as gaseous reactant the hurdles for technical implementation are nowadays lower than in the past. Similarly to catalytic processes the electro-carbonylation of phenol with CO has only been described in literature for Pd based, both metallic 10-12 and homogeneous 13 catalysts. For the heterogeneous catalysts, PdCl2 (Pd2+) supported on activated carbon 10 and Pd0/Ketjenblack 11 were studied. In both systems, the yields for DPC were very dependent on the dryness of the solvents, and both sodium phenoxide (PhONa) and trimethylamine (Et3N) additives have shown to be necessary for the reaction to proceed. The role of these additives was described as being H+ acceptors from PhOH. In this work, we use spectro-electrochemical techniques to access mechanistic information about the reaction pathways towards DPC starting from PhOH and CO at Au electrodes in methanol (MeOH) electrolytes. Recently, our group reported spectro-electrochemical evidences for the synthesis of DMC at Au electrodes at low overpotentials (~0.4 V vs Ag/AgCl), revealing that there is no need for an oxidized surface in order to achieve this product from methanol carbonylation with CO 14. Based on those findings, the electrosynthesis of DPC was also investigated on Au electrodes, using similar conditions. The experiments were performed with solutions of 0.1 M PhOH in MeOH with 0.1 M LiClO4 as supporting electrolyte in Ar and CO atmospheres under oxidative conditions using Au electrodes. The obtained cyclic voltammograms are presented in figure 1.

Figure 1: Cyclic voltammograms obtained at Au electrodes in 0.1 M LiClO4 in MeOH with in Ar atmosphere (black line) and with 0.1 M PhOH with Ar (blue line) and CO atmosphere (red line). The CVs show that in the absence of phenol, Au oxidation (and consequently its reduction) is not observed at this potential range in MeOH. In the black line on Figure 1, a small oxidation peak is present at potential around 0.4 V (vs Ag/AgCl) most likely due to MeOH oxidation on the Au electrode, as reveled by FTIR results previously reported 14. When PhOH is added to the solution, this peak (as well as other oxidation currents at higher potentials) seems to be inhibited, most likely due to phenol adsorption on the

electrode surface as observed in aqueous solutions 15-16. However, around 0.2 V a small oxidation peak, absent in pure MeOH can be observed. This peak can be related with the formation of PhO radicals which are the first step for PhOH oxidation. Contrarily to what is observed for aqueous solutions, further oxidation currents for PhOH are not observed, most likely because they are catalyzed by the presence of AuO 15 that is absent in MeOH at the range of potentials used in this study. The CVs, where CO and PhOH are both present, show an increase in oxidation current with onset potential at 0.5 V, that are related (as explained further in combination with the in situ FTIR results) to the formation of both DMC and DPC (although CO oxidation cannot be excluded).

Figure 2: FTIR spectra obtained for Au electrode in 0.1 M LiClO4 in MeOH with 0.1 M PhOH saturated with Ar (A) and CO (B). Background was obtained at 0 V. The spectra presented in Figure 2A (Ar atmosphere) show bands at 2341, 2047, 1737 and 1706 cm-1. These bands correspond to CO2 formation (2341 cm-1), MeOH (2047 cm-1), methyl formate (MF) formation (1737 cm-1) and lithium methoxide consumption (1706 cm-1), due to methanol decomposition/oxidation as described in our recent publication (which also contains further reference spectra) 14. The addition of PhOH does not appear to change the reaction pathway for MeOH oxidation. Moreover, the spectra do not show any evidence of PhOH decomposition or oxidation to products other than CO2. However, even its decomposition to CO2 is not clear as this product is also observed for MeOH oxidation and a clear distinction from its origin cannot be done. Nevertheless, the intensity of the band for MF, the major MeOH oxidation product on Au 14, are less intense than previously reported. In line with the observations on the CVs, we can attribute this decrease in intensity to some blocking of the Au electrode by adsorbed PhOH or its radical. After the solution was saturated with CO (Figure 2B), two new bands for product formation (positive bands) are observed in the spectra at potentials higher than 0.4 V (vs Ag/AgCl). A band at 1757 cm-1 rises with increasing potential; this band has been previously attributed to the formation of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) 14. At the same time, a second band appears in the spectra at 1780 cm-1 that can be due to the formation of other carbonate, DPC or methyl phenyl carbonate (MPC). To shed light onto the nature of the compound giving rise to the band observed at 1780 cm-1 formed from the reaction of PhOH with CO in MeOH, transmission spectra for solutions of different

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 5

Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis carbonates and their mixtures in MeOH solution containing the supporting electrolyte were obtained and are plotted in Figure 3. The results show that DPC presents vibration features at 1780 and 1758 cm-1, while DMC shows only one band at 1758 cm-1. The mixture of the two compounds presents bands at the same wavenumbers but with different relative intensities (red line in figure 2). For the case of the MPC solution, it also presents two vibrational bands but at slightly shifted wavenumbers (1768 and 1749 cm-1) when compared with DPC and DMC. However, for the mixture of DPC and MPC the bands overlap and appear at very similar wavenumbers compared to the individual compounds (1780, 1768 and 1758 cm-1).

and MPC, respectively. As DMC is already in solution, we suggest that the exchange of a methoxy group by a phenoxy group is taking place. These results are strongly supported by the observation of MPC for which only one of the methoxy groups has been replaced.

Figure 4: FTIR spectra obtained by scanning toward positive potentials at Au electrode in 0.1 M LiClO4 in MeCN with 0.1 M DMC (A) and 0.1M DMC + 0.1 M PhOH (B). Background obtained at 0 V.

Figure 3: Transmission spectra for 0.1 M DPC, DMC, MPC and correspondent mixtures in 0.1 M LiClO4 in acetonitrile. Background obtained with 0.1 M LiClO4 in MeOH. We have recently described the reaction scheme for the formation of DMC from MeOH carbonylation with CO at Au electrodes 14. The formation of methoxy, intermediates necessary for the carbonylation, was shown to be closely related with the electrode ability to oxidize MeOH to methyl formate. Moreover, the metal needs to bind CO with an intermediate binding strength in order to allow the reaction to proceed. The FTIR spectra presented in Figure 2 show no evidence for the direct formation of DPC from phenoxy carbonylation with CO, and the formation of DMC is observed simultaneously. Moreover, it is know that the transesterification of DMC with PhOH can occur when proper temperature and catalysts are used 17. In order to understand the role of DMC in the formation of DPC the following experiments were performed: The solvent was replaced with acetonitrile (MeCN) to avoid the formation of any intermediate coming from MeOH oxidation and no CO was present in solution. Only 0.1 M of DMC and 0.1M of PhOH were added to the acetonitrile solution containing 0.1M of LiClO4 as supporting electrolyte. The spectroelectrochemical results for the Au electrode are presented in Figure 4. The spectra obtained when only DMC is present in the solution (Figure 4A) shows small bands at 1758 cm-1 due to DMC in the thin layer. In addition, a positive band for CO (2023 cm-1) 18 can be identified as consequence of DMC oxidative decomposition 19. After the addition of PhOH (figure 4B), some changes are observed in the spectra. The most notable difference is visible in the 1750-1790 cm-1 region, where new bands rise at ~0.6 V (vs Ag/AgCl). In this region three bands are observed at 1780, 1758, 1749 cm-1. Analyzing these bands based on the transmission spectra plotted in figure 3, we can attribute them to DPC, DMC

Based on these findings, the following reaction pathway for the formation of DPC from PhOH in methanol electrolyte can be suggested. As a first step, DMC is formed from the carbonylation of the methoxy groups from MeOH and CO. Next, the replacement of the methoxy groups with phenoxy takes place. It must be mentioned, that the reaction does not take place if there is no applied potential, most likely because the polarization of the CO of the DMC to more positive values is needed, so the nucleophilic attack of PhO- can take place, and MeO- is substituted. It is interesting that transesterification of DMC by PhOH can occur under electrochemical conditions at Au electrodes without the need of high temperatures and using the same catalyst as for the synthesis of DMC. However, the exact nature of this transesterification under electrochemical conditions currently remains unknown. Through this process it is possible synthesize, in one step, DMC and directly convert it into DPC. In situ FTIR spectroscopy is an excellent tool for mechanistic studies and for identification of species and intermediates involved on the electrochemical reactions. Unfortunately, one of its major drawbacks is that the results are only qualitative and do not allow quantification of the products. However, the findings on this work provide deeper understanding of the reaction and a new electrochemical path for the direct production of DPC than can be further studied and optimized for future industrial application. In summary, with this work we show a direct path for the electrochemical synthesis of DPC starting from CO, MeOH and PhOH on Au electrodes. By using in situ FTIR we observed that DPC can be obtained on Au electrodes at low overpotentials (0.5 V vs Ag/AgCl) through an indirect electrochemical path where DMC is synthetized and readily converted into DPC in an “electro-transesterification” step, at room temperature. For the first time, DPC is obtained electrochemically without the presence of palladium-based catalysts. With this report, important insights on the electrochemical synthesis of DPC are given, especially con-

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Catalysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

cerning the reaction intermediates, opening new possibilities for the design of alternative processes and routes for the electrochemical synthesis of DPC that can become industrially competitive.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT Supporting Information. Materials and experimental details are shown as supporting information. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author * Marc T. M. Koper [email protected] Present Addresses †Marta C. Figueiredo University of Copenhagen, Department of Chemistry Nano-Science Center Universitetsparken, 5 2100 Copenhagen DENMARK ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors acknowledge Covestro for the financial support of this project.

REFERENCES 1. Frontana-Uribe, B. A.; Little, R. D.; Ibanez, J. G.; Palma, A.; Vasquez-Medrano, R., Organic electrosynthesis: a promising green methodology in organic chemistry. Green Chemistry 2010, 12, 2099-2119. 2. Botte, G. G.; Daramola, D. A.; Muthuvel, M., 9.14 Preparative Electrochemistry for Organic Synthesis A2 - Knochel, Paul. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II (Second Edition), Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2014; pp 351-389. 3. Kintrup, J.; Millaruelo, M.; Trieu, V.; Bulan, A.; Mojica, E. S., Gas Diffusion Electrodes for Efficient Manufacturing of Chlorine and Other Chemicals. The Electrochemical Society Interface 2017, 26, 73-76. 4. Kim, W. B.; Joshi, U. A.; Lee, J. S., Making Polycarbonates without Employing Phosgene:  An Overview on Catalytic Chemistry of

Intermediate and Precursor Syntheses for Polycarbonate. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2004, 43, 1897-1914. 5. Gong, J.; Ma, X.; Wang, S., Phosgene-free approaches to catalytic synthesis of diphenyl carbonate and its intermediates. Applied Catalysis A: General 2007, 316, 1-21. 6. Soloveichik, G. L., Oxidative Carbonylation: Diphenyl Carbonate. In Liquid Phase Aerobic Oxidation Catalysis: Industrial Applications and Academic Perspectives, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: 2016; pp 189-208. 7. Battista, R. A.; Johnson, B. F.; Moreno, P. O.; Pressman, E. J., Method for making aromatic carbonates. European Patent UP1140776, 2001. 8. Shalyaev, K. V.; Soloveichik, G. L.; Johnson, B. F.; Whisenhunt, D. W., Method and catalyst system for producing aromatic carbonates. US Patent: US6207849, 2001 . 9. Fukuoka, S., Non-Phosgene Polycarbonate from CO2 Industrialization of Green Chemical Process. 2012. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. New York, ISBN: 978-1-61470-877-3 10. Murayama, T.; Hayashi, T.; Arai, Y.; Yamanaka, I., Direct synthesis of diphenyl carbonate by mediated electrocarbonylation of phenol at Pd2+-supported activated carbon anode. Electrochimica Acta 2011, 56, 2926-2933. 11. Murayama, T.; Hayashi, T.; Kanega, R.; Yamanaka, I., Phosgene-Free Method for Diphenyl Carbonate Synthesis at the Pd0/Ketjenblack Anode. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2012, 116, 10607-10616. 12. Kanega, R.; Yamanaka, I., Diphenyl Carbonate Synthesis by Homogeneous Pd Electrocatalyst. Topics in Catalysis 2014, 57, 995-999. 13. Kanega, R.; Ogihara, H.; Yamanaka, I.; Electrosynthesis of diphenyl carbonate by homogeneous Pd electrocatalysts using Au nanoparticles on graphene as efficient anodes Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 6002 14. Figueiredo, M.C., Trieu, V.; Eiden, S.; Koper, M.T.M., Spectroelectrochemical examination of the formation of dimethyl carbonate from CO and methanol at different electrode materials. Journal of American Chemical Society, 2017, 139, 14693. 15. Wang, J.; Jiang, M.; Lu, F., Electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance investigation of surface fouling due to phenol oxidation. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 1998, 444, 127-132. 16. Ferreira, M.; Varela, H.; Torresi, R. M.; Tremiliosi-Filho, G., Electrode passivation caused by polymerization of different phenolic compounds. Electrochimica Acta 2006, 52, 434-442. 17. Haubrock, J.; Wermink, W.; Versteeg, G. F.; Kooijman, H. A.; Taylor, R.; van Sint Annaland, M.; Hogendoorn, J. A., Reaction from Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) to Diphenyl Carbonate (DPC). 2. Kinetics of the Reactions from DMC via Methyl Phenyl Carbonate to DPC. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2008, 47, 9862-9870. 18. Rodriguez, P.; Kwon, Y.; Koper, M. T. M., The promoting effect of adsorbed carbon monoxide on the oxidation of alcohols on a gold catalyst. Nat Chem 2012, 4, 177-182. 19. Moshkovich, M.; Cojocaru, M.; Gottlieb, H. E.; Aurbach, D., The study of the anodic stability of alkyl carbonate solutions by in situ FTIR spectroscopy, EQCM, NMR and MS. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2001, 497, 84-96.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 5

Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

Insert Table of Contents artwork here

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5