Subscriber access provided by Gothenburg University Library
Article
Graphene Oxide Filled Lignin/Starch Polymer bionanocomposite: Structural, Physical and Mechanical studies. Meryem Aqlil, Annie Moussemba Nzenguet, Younes Essamlali, Asmae Snik, Mohamed Larzek, and Mohamed Zahouily J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04155 • Publication Date (Web): 07 Nov 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 9, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Graphene Oxide Filled Lignin/Starch Polymer bio-
2
nanocomposite: Structural, Physical and
3
Mechanical studies
4
Meryem Aqlil1, Annie Moussemba Nzenguet1, Younes Essamlali1,2, Asmae Snik1,
5
Mohamed Larzek3 and Mohamed Zahouily1,2*
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1
Laboratoire de Matériaux, Catalyse et Valorisation des Ressources Naturelles (MaCaVa), URAC 24, FST Mohammedia B. P. 146, 20650, Université Hassan II Casablanca Morocco. 2 MAScIRFoundation, Nanotechnologie, VARENA Center, Rabat Design, Rue Mohamed El Jazouli, Madinat El Irfane 10100-Rabat, Morocco ; 3 OLAC : Omnium de l’anti corrosion, ZI Tit Melil Casablanca-Morocco. * Correspondence:
[email protected] ; Tel. +212661416359
14
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 2 of 40
15
Abstract
16
In this study, graphene oxide(GO)was investigated as a potential nano-reinforcing agent in
17
starch/lignin (ST/L) biopolymer matrix. Bio-nanocomposite films based on ST/L blend matrix
18
and GO were prepared by solution casting technique of the corresponding film forming
19
solution. The structure, morphologies and properties of bio-nanocomposite films were
20
characterized by FTIR, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis),
21
SEM and tensile tests. The experimental results showed that contents of GO have a significant
22
influence on the mechanical properties of the produced films. The results revealed that the
23
interfacial interaction formed in the bio-nanocomposite films improved the compatibility
24
between GO fillers and ST/L matrix. The addition of GO also reduced moisture uptake (Mu)
25
and water vapor permeability of ST/L blend films. In addition, TGA showed that the thermal
26
stability of bio-nanocomposite films was better than that of neat starch film. These findings
27
confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed approach to produce biodegradable films with
28
enhanced properties, which may be used in packaging applications.
29
Starch;
Lignin;
30
Keywords:
31
Physicochemical properties.
Graphene
oxide;
Bio-nanocomposite;
32 33 34 35
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Interaction;
Page 3 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
36
1. Introduction
37
Due to the environmental impact caused by petrochemical-based synthetic polymers, natural
38
polymers have received tremendous attention in the last few decades because of their
39
potential to substitute the current synthetic polymers1 owing to their non-toxicity,
40
biodegradability and biocompatibility.2 Apart from their environmental benefits, bio-based
41
polymers exhibit other advantages such as low cost, non-dependence on petroleum sources
42
and availability from renewable resources. Moreover, natural bio-based polymers are easily
43
biodegradable within a short period of time and solve the waste disposal problems generated
44
by using non-biodegradable polymers.3,4 Among the many candidates of natural
45
biodegradable polymers, starch and lignin have been widely studied for the fabrication of
46
biodegradable films owing to their renewability, biodegradability and availability at low cost.
47
Starch is one of the most commonly available natural polysaccharides obtained from a great
48
variety of crops.5 It has been accepted as a good alternative for the production of
49
biodegradable plastics and has high potential for replacing current synthetic polymers.6-8
50
Starch has been widely used in several food and non-food applications, particularly in
51
agriculture, alimentary, medicine, and packaging industries.9-12 Unfortunately, thermoplastic
52
starch suffers from many drawbacks related to its water sensitivity and poor mechanical
53
properties.13,14 To overcome these limitations, many approaches were suggested in literature.
54
One of the most effective methods for the development of new and inexpensive biodegradable
55
materials with improved properties is to blend starch with either synthetic or natural
56
polymers15-18 or to incorporate a nanoscale reinforcing materials into the starch based
57
polymeric matrix.19-22 Another, approach that has been widely studied consists of the use a
58
chemically modified starch by either oxidation or carboxymethylation methods.23-25
59
Lignin, a natural biopolymer extracted from sugarcane bagasse, is the second most abundant
60
natural polymer after cellulose, it has been widely used in biodegradable polymers
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
61
manufacturing owing to its intrinsic properties such as high degree of crosslinking between
62
the units, hydrophobic nature, amorphous structure and three-dimensional structure.26,27 The
63
abundance of carbonyl and carboxylic groups, phenolic and aliphatic hydroxyl groups confer
64
to lignin a good ability to establish a strong interfacial interaction with other polymers making
65
this natural biopolymer a suitable candidate for blending polymers. Many researchers put
66
forward the use of lignin to blend with various synthetic polymers, either in their native state
67
or after compatibilization, such as poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(lactic
68
acid).28,29 Blending starch with lignin is an appealing approach since no compatibilization is
69
required. It is well known that the addition of lignin within starch matrix significantly
70
improves the physical and the chemical properties of starch.30-33 Baumberger et al.34-36
71
reported that blending lignin extracted either from traditional or novel pulping processes
72
within starch matrix resulted in an important improvement of the performances of starch
73
films. Besides, a significant reduction of the water solubility and water content of
74
starch/lignin film has been observed.36 Moreover, it has been previously shown that the
75
incorporation of lignin into starch can also reduce the water permeability and increases the
76
thermal stability and tensile strength of the resulted ST/L blend film.37-40 However, the
77
properties of the resulting ST/L film are highly dependent on the origin of the lignin and also
78
on the adopted extraction process. Most of the interest in developing low cost biodegradable
79
plastics is due to their wide spectrum of application which includes packaging and consumer
80
products. The major applications for starch-lignin bio-nanocomposites would be packaging
81
containers for single or short-term use, as naturally biodegradable alternatives to conventional
82
synthetic polymers, so they have great potential to be used as fresh food packaging.
83
Recently, much more attentions have been paid to the development of the new materials with
84
specific properties by incorporation of nanometric reinforcements in polymeric matrix.41,42
85
This method has been considered as an effective strategy to improve the physicochemical
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 40
Page 5 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
86
properties of the polymeric matrix.43,44 The synergic effect between the nanosized filler and
87
polymer resulted in a significant improvement of properties of obtained nanocomposites.
88
Various types of nanofillers organic or inorganic are used as an effective nano-reinforcements
89
for many biopolymer matrix, like carbon nanotubes and nanofibers,45 GO,46 nanoclay47 and
90
cellulose nanocrystals,48 etc. Among the family of nanofillers, GO has attracted a great deal of
91
interest and has been widely used as a nano-reinforcement in polymer composite materials.
92
GO has been widely used in combination with different biopolymers to design new bio-
93
nanocomposites with improved mechanical, thermal, electrical, as well as, gas-, and water
94
vapor-barrier properties. In addition, high surface area, high aspect ratio, large number of
95
functional groups, and high strength of GO allow it to establish strong interfacial interactions
96
between the filler and the polymeric matrix. Moreover, the functional groups, such as
97
carboxyl, amino, or hydroxyl groups, contained in biopolymers matrix leads to a very
98
efficient interaction with the functional groups on GO.49,50 GO has the ability to form a strong
99
physical interaction within the polymeric matrix since it contains several oxygen-containing
100
functional groups, such as hydroxyl (OH) and carbonyl groups (-C=O).51,52 It has been widely
101
used to improve the thermal stability, electrical and mechanical properties of several
102
polymers.53The aim of the present work was to study the preparation of graphene oxide (GO)
103
reinforced ST/L based polymer blends. GO nanosheets were characterized using X ray
104
diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM),
105
high resolution-transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) and atomic force microscopy
106
(AFM). The influence of incorporation of increasing amount of GO on the structural,
107
morphological and mechanical properties as well as thermal stability of the ST/L based bio-
108
nanocomposite films was studied. Furthermore, the water swelling, hydrolytic degradation
109
and moisture absorption of the prepared bio-nanocomposites were also investigated. The
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
110
fundamental structure-property relationship of GO-based starch/lignin bio-nanocomposites
111
was also investigated and discussed.
112
2. Materials and methods
113
2.1. Materials
114
The sugarcane bagasse (SCB) was provided from COSUMAR Group, company in south
115
Morocco. The moisture content of the sugarcane bagasse fibers was about 7%. Wheat starch
116
and graphite powder (≤ 20 µm, 99.99%)were purchased from VWR International and Sigma-
117
Aldrich, respectively. Analytical grade chemicals used for lignin extraction and graphite
118
oxidation were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and were used as received.
119
2.2. Lignin Extraction
120
Lignin was extracted from sugarcane bagasse by alkaline hydrolysis. Firstly, the SCB fibers
121
were ground and sieved (150 µm) to remove the fine powder and the small particles. The
122
ground fibers were repeatedly washed with hot water for 2 hours at 60°C and then filtered.
123
After complete washing, the obtained residue was digested with alkali solution (15wt%
124
NaOH). The solution was then filtered and the filtrate, lignin solution, was acidified with 5N
125
H2SO4 until pH = 2 was reached. The obtained precipitate was recovered by centrifugation,
126
washed with distilled water, dried in a hot desiccator at 60°C for a complete removal of water
127
and finally ground into a uniform powder.
128
2.3. Synthesis of graphene oxide
129
Graphene oxide was prepared from natural graphite according to the Hummers method.54 In a
130
typical procedure, 1 g of graphite powder and 1g of sodium nitrate were firstly mixed together
131
until complete homogenization. Afterward, 30 ml of sulfuric acid (98%) was added and the
132
mixture was stirred for 30 minutes in an ice-bath. Next, 3 g of KMnO4 (99%) was slowly
133
added in a controlled manner to avoid the increase of the temperature (˂20°C). The flask was
134
then removed and heated in an oil bath at 40°C under constant magnetic stirring for 2hours.
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 40
Page 7 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
135
Afterward, 50 ml of distilled water was slowly added, which generate an increase in the
136
temperature to 98°C. The mixture was maintained at this temperature under continuous
137
stirring for 15 minutes. Subsequently, 12 ml of H2O2 solution (30% v/v) was added to the
138
reaction mixture under vigorous stirring for 10 min. Finally, the resulting yellow cake was
139
cooled until room temperature diluted with 260 mL of distilled water and centrifuged. The
140
obtained precipitate was washed several times with distilled water and dried at 60°C during
141
72 hours. Appropriate amounts of the as-prepared graphite oxide (0.3, 0.5 and 0.7wt% with
142
respect to ST/L weight) were dispersed in 20 mL of distilled water and sonicated for
143
to make a homogeneous brown dispersion of graphene oxide nanosheets.
144
2.4. Bio-nanocomposite film processing
145
The preparation ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites films were carried out in two consecutive
146
steps. Firstly, 0.5 g of lignin was dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water with constant stirring
147
within 12 hours at 25°C followed by sonication for 1 hour until complete dissolution.
148
Separately,
149
2.5 g of wheat starch and 0.75 g of glycerol, as a plasticizer, were dissolved in 46.25 mL of
150
distilled water at 95°C during 90 min under vigorous stirring. The starch solution was cooled
151
until room temperature while keeping a constant stirring, and then it was sonicated for
152
15 minutes to ensure the complete homogenization. The ST/L film-forming solution was
153
prepared by mixing the starch and lignin solutions under vigorous magnetic stirring for 1 h at
154
25°C until the formation of a homogeneous solution (Fig. 1). In the second step, a
155
predetermined amount of GO suspension was slowly added to the ST/L blend and the mixture
156
was sonicated during 30 minutes followed by vigorous magnetic stirring for 6 hours until the
157
formation of a homogeneous dispersion. The GO loading levels were 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7wt%
158
based on dry ST/L blend. Subsequently, the ST/L-GO film-forming solutions (Figure 1) were
159
cast onto plastic disk and left to cure at room temperature for complete water evaporation.
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
3 hours
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
160
After that, the ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites were dried at 60°C for 6 hours to obtain dry
161
films. Pure ST/L blend and neat starch films were prepared according to the same procedure.
162
The films were coded as ST, ST/L, ST/L-0.3, ST/L-0.5 and ST/L-0.7, where the number
163
stands for the GO loadings.
164
3. Characterization techniques
165
3.1. Characterization of graphene oxide
166
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded at room temperature on a Bruker D8
167
Discover diffractometer using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5438 Å). The samples were finely
168
grounded before being analyzed. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)
169
measurements were performed on anAffinity-1S SHIMADZU spectrometer fitted with a
170
Golden Gate single reflection ATR accessory in the range of 4000 to 400 cm−1 with a
171
resolution of 16 cm-1and an accumulation of 42 scans. Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA)
172
were conducted under air gas using a TGA-Q500 (TA Instruments) apparatus at a heating rate
173
of 10 °C/min-1 from 25 and 800°C. The Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectra were recorded on
174
the LAMBDA 1050 UV/Vis/NIR instrument in the range of 200-800 nm. Scanning electron
175
microscopy (SEM)analyses were recorded using a FEI Quanta 200 field emission. The
176
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs were obtained on a Tecnai G2
177
microscope at 120 kV. The sample used for TEM characterization were dispersed in a mixture
178
of water/ethanol (10% v/v) and then deposited on the TEM grid. The solvent was left to
179
evaporate for few minutes before analysis. High resolution transmission electron microscopy
180
(HR-TEM) analysis was carried out by a Jeol 2100F microscope, equipped with ultra-high-
181
resolution pole piece, field emission Schottky electron source and operating at 200 kV with a
182
resolution point of 0.235 nm. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) measurements were obtained
183
using a Veeco Dimension ICON. Before being analyzed, the samples used for AFM
184
characterizations were deposited on mica sheets.
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 40
Page 9 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
185
3.2. Characterization of nanocomposite films
186
Mechanical tensile properties of the prepared bio-nanocomposite films were measured on the
187
LUDWIG mpk tensiometer upon samples with dimensions of 80 mm × 10 mm
188
(width × length), at tensile rate of 10 mm/min. Five tests were performed and the obtained
189
values are the averages of the five measurements. All film samples were preconditioned for
190
24h in a constant-temperature humidity chamber set at 40°C before testing.
191
Film thickness was measured to the nearest 0.01 mm using a hand-held micrometer (digital
192
GALIPER). Three thickness measurements were taken on each tensile testing specimen along
193
the length of the rectangular specimen, and the mean value was used in thickness calculation.
194
In order to avoid the influence of the thickness of specimens, all the samples used for the
195
measurement have a same thickness of 130 µm.
196
The moisture uptake (Mu) of the ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites was determined according to
197
the ASTM E104 standard with slight modifications.55 Typically, rectangular specimens of the
198
prepared bio-nanocomposites (20 mm × 20 mm) were firstly dried at 105°C for 2 hours in a
199
hot desiccator and then weighted and incubated in a climatic chamber at 25°C with controlled
200
relative humidity (RH) of 75 ± 0.5%. At different intervals of time (each hour) over duration
201
of 6 hours, the films were then removed and weighted. The moisture uptake of the as-
202
prepared films was calculated according to the following equation:
Mu% =
Mf − Mi × 100 Mi
203
Where Mf and Mi are the weights of the sample after 6 hours exposure to 75 % RH and of the
204
dried sample before being incubated in the climatic chamber, respectively.
205
The water swelling capacity (SW) was determined as following: rectangular specimens
206
(20 mm × 20 mm) of neat ST, ST/L blend and ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposite films were firstly
207
dried in an oven at 100°C for 24h until constant weight (Wi) taken. Then, the films were
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
208
immersed in a glass bottle containing 20 mL of distilled water during 24 hours. After
209
immersion in water, samples were removed and weighted (Wf). The water swelling capacity
210
(SW) was calculated according to the following equation: SW % =
Wf − Wi × 100 Wi
211
The hydrolytic degradation of the prepared bio-nanocomposites was also investigated.
212
Previously dried and weighed films specimens (20 mm × 30 mm) were immersed in a glass
213
bottles containing 25 mL of distilled water and stored at room temperature. After 30 days of
214
incubation, the rectangular specimens were removed from the solution and dried at 80°C for
215
2 days. The hydrolytic degradation was estimated by weighing the films before and after
216
immersion in water.
217
The water vapor permeability (WVP) of the prepared bio-nanocomposite films was
218
determined according to the standard method E96-90 with some modifications.56 Glass bottles
219
with 20 mm diameter and of 40 mm depth were charged with 10g of distilled water and were
220
covered with the prepared bio-nanocomposite. The charged bottles were then weighted and
221
incubated in a climatic chamber at 25°C at a relative humidity of 50%. Successive weightings
222
were carried out every hour for duration of 7 hours and the changes in the bottles weight were
223
recorded function of time. The relationship between weight change and time should be
224
represented by a linear plot; the slope of this plot divided by the area of the glass bottle (m2)
225
represents the water vapor transmission rat (WVTR). The WVP (gm/m2 h Pa) was calculated
226
as follows: WVP=
WVTR WVTR X= X ΔP SR1-R2
227
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 40
Page 11 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
228
Where X is the thickness of the film (m), S is the saturation vapor pressure (Pa) at the test
229
temperature (25°C), R1 and R2 are the relative humidity in the glass bottle and climatic
230
chamber, respectively.
231
4. Results and discussions
232
4.1. Characterization of GO
233
Before proceeding to the incorporation of the GO into the ST/L blend, the successfully
234
oxidation and exfoliation of GO into multilayer nanosheets was investigated by means of
235
X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force
236
microscopy (AFM) techniques. The GO nanosheets dispersion was achieved by alternating
237
vigorous magnetic stirring and intense sonication of the oxidized natural graphite. This
238
dispersion of GO was stable even after 4 weeks storage at room temperature.
239
The FTIR spectrum of GO showed many characteristics bands (Fig. 2b; right). The broad
240
band located at 3373 cm-1 was attributed to the stretching vibration of the hydroxyl groups
241
(O-H), and those observed at around 1714 and 1612 cm-1were attributed to the stretching
242
vibration of carboxylic groups and the skeletal vibrations of unoxidized graphitic domains,
243
respectively.57 In addition, other oxygen-containing functional groups such as C-OH, C-O-C
244
and C-O were clearly observed at 1363, 1148 and 1036 cm-1, respectively.58 The appearance
245
of these bands revealed the presence of numerous oxygen-containing functional groups thus
246
indicating that the graphite has been successfully oxidized into the GO nanosheets.
247
The XRD patterns of graphite and graphite oxide prepared according to the Hummer’s
248
method are shown in Figure 2 (left). The XRD pattern of the graphites how done single sharp
249
peak at 26.5° assigned to the highly organized layer structure of graphite. The interlayer
250
distance corresponding to the 002 reflections was 0.34 nm, which is in good agreement with
251
the JCPDS data N°75-2078. After oxidation of graphite, the diffraction peak observed at 2Ɵ =
252
26.5° was shifted to 2Ɵ = 10° and the d-spacing was increased from 0.34 nm to 0.88 nm (Fig. 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
253
2b; left). This shifting was mainly due to the formation of oxygen-containing functional
254
groups between the layers of the graphite.59 The obtained results confirmed the successful
255
oxidation of graphite into graphite oxide.
256
The scanning electron microscopy provides significant morphological information especially
257
those ascribed to the morphology and the size of the as-prepared GO. Typical SEM and TEM
258
micrographs are shown in Figure 3. SEM image in Fig. 3a showed that the as-prepared GO
259
was mainly consisting of multilayer agglomerate, which formed a three-dimensional porous
260
network. The surface morphology of GO was characterized by the presence of distinct
261
wrinkles and folding. TEM image of GO nanosheets (Fig. 3b) revealed that this sample is
262
mainly composed of assembled thin layers nanosheets with wrinkled and folded morphology.
263
These observations indicate that a high degree of exfoliation was achieved during the
264
oxidation and exfoliation processes. According to the HR-TEM micrograph of GO (Fig. 3c),
265
the value of the inter-planar distance d002 was found to be 0.75 nm. The selected area electron
266
diffraction (SAED)pattern (Fig. 3d) showed a two clear diffraction spots characteristic of
267
crystalline order, suggesting the presence of unoxidized graphitic regions within the graphene
268
oxide. This pattern is consistent with a hexagonal lattice of GO nanosheet.
269
The exfoliation level of the GO nanosheets was further investigated by AFM. As shown in
270
Fig. 3e the GO sample is mainly consisting of thin sheets irregular in sharp and adopting a
271
uniform thickness. The mean thickness of the obtained sheets was approximately 1 nm while
272
the other lateral dimensions varied from 100 to 800 nm. This relatively higher thickness,
273
which is relatively higher than that expected one for a single sheet of graphene oxide (0.34
274
nm), might be due to the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups to the surface of
275
GO nanosheets or to the existence of space between the nanosheets and the substrate due to
276
the wrinkled and folded structure of GO nanosheets that arises during solvent evaporation.60
277
12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 40
Page 13 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
278
4.2. Characterization of bio-nanocomposites
279
4.2.1. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
280
FTIR measurements provide significant information about the possible interfacial interactions
281
among starch, lignin and GO nanosheets in bio-nanocomposite films. Fig. 4 shows the typical
282
FTIR spectra of GO, neat starch and ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposite films loaded with various
283
GO amounts. It should be noted that all films were dried under vacuum at 40°C overnight
284
before being analyzed. As shown in Figure 4, neat starch exhibits typical stretching and
285
bending vibration of OH groups at 3229 and 1420 cm-1, respectively. The band observed at
286
2929 cm-1 was assigned to the C-H stretching. Besides, the bands located at 1152 cm-1 and
287
those observed at approximately 1077 and 1008 cm-1 were assigned to the stretching vibration
288
of C-O group in C-O-H and C-O-C groups of the anhydro-glucose ring of starch molecule,
289
respectively.61 The FTIR spectra of pristine lignin showed a broad peak between 3600 and
290
3200 cm-1 assigned to the alcoholic and phenolic -OH absorptions. The broad peaks at around
291
1600 and 1400 cm-1 are attributed to the aromatic structures (Fig. 4). After addition of lignin
292
biopolymer, a strong interfacial interaction between functional groups of lignin and starch
293
was occurred resulting in a better compatibility between these two biopolymers, thus
294
suggesting the formation of strong hydrogen bond between lignin and starch molecules.62,63
295
This indicated that starch and lignin achieved a high degree of compatibility. This finding was
296
further confirmed by the displacement of the carbonyl band located at around 1008 cm-1
297
towards lower wavelength numbers as shown in Fig. 4b. Compared the spectrum of ST/L
298
film to those of starch and lignin, it can be found that the spectrum of ST/L film is similar to
299
that of neat starch because the blend matrix composition is mainly based on starch
300
biopolymer.
301
The FTIR spectras of ST/L-0.3,ST/L-0.5 and ST/L-0.7 offer some important information
302
related to the interactions between oxygenated groups in GO and ST/L blend. Indeed, when
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
303
GO was added, the characteristic bands at 1152, 1077, 1002 cm-1 of ST/L blend shifted to
304
lower wave-numbers 1134, 1062, 999 cm-1, respectively, in ST/L blend filled by 0.7wt% of
305
GO, suggesting the occurrence of strong crosslinking reaction between the oxygen-containing
306
surface functional groups of GO (-OH, -COOH and -O-) and fuctional groups of ST/L matrix
307
(C-O and OH groups). The occurence of this interaction was further confirmed by the
308
increase in the intensity of the OH groups which indicate that additional hydrogen bondings
309
were formed (Fig. 4a). Based on the latter explanations, it seems that the ST/L-GO bio-
310
nanocomposites exhibitedan interconnected network structure linked by strong hydrogen
311
bonds either between starch and lignin biopolymers and also between ST/L blend and GO
312
nanosheets (Scheme 1).
313
4.2.2. Thermogravimetric analysis
314
The thermal stability of the ST and ST/L blend films as well as the bio-nanocomposites films
315
was evaluated in order to determine if the addition of lignin and GO could produce any
316
improvement in the thermal behavior of starch. The thermogravimetric (TG)and derivative
317
thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of the starch, crosslinked ST/L and ST/L-GO bio-
318
nanocomposite are shown in Fig. 5a and Fig. 5b, respectively. Starch film exhibited tree
319
major weight losses (Fig. 5a). The first weight loss before 120°C was attributed to the
320
evaporation of water, the second one within a range of 120-330°C was due to the removal of
321
glycerol added as a plasticizer, whereas the third weight loss around 330-500°C was assigned
322
to the thermal degradation of starch. The ST/L blend showed similar thermal degradation
323
behavior as starch film (Fig. 5a). The weight losses observed at 25-150°C, 150-330°C and
324
330-490°C were due to the removal of water, thermal degradation of plasticizer and the
325
decomposition of starch and lignin, respectively. Moreover, the thermal stability of the ST/L
326
film was found to be improved after the lignin addition, since the degradation rate in the range
327
of 150-330°C was found to be decreased. This improvement in thermal stability of ST/L film
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 40
Page 15 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
328
could be assigned to the high thermal stability of the lignin molecule and the formation of a
329
crosslinked ST/L network.64 For ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites, the weight loss occurred at
330
below 100°C was related to the evaporation of the absorbed water. The water absorbency of
331
ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites was lower than ST/L blend, suggesting that the addition of GO
332
nanosheets prevents the prepared films from the absorption of water when exposed to the
333
moisture.65 The incorporation of GO in the crosslinked ST/L matrix resulted in a slight
334
improvement of thermal stability at a loading amount of 0.3 to 0.5wt% of GO since the
335
residue increases with increasing amounts of GO. According to the DTG curve of ST/L-GO
336
films (Fig. 5b), it can be observed that the maximum degradation temperature of the ST/L-
337
0.7GO film (482°C), in the third degradation step, is slightly higher than that corresponding to
338
the ST/L blend (472°C), thus indicating that when additional amount of GO was added (up to
339
0.7wt%), the thermal stability of the resultant bio-nanocomposite was further improved.
340 341
4.2.3. Scanning electron microscopy
342
The surface morphology of the different films was examined by SEM to verify the
343
compatibility between both starch and lignin and also ST/L blend and GO. Fig.5 shows
344
typical SEM images of ST (Fig. 6a), ST/L (Fig. 6b) blend, ST/L-0.3(Fig. 6c) and ST/L-0.7
345
(Fig. 6d) films. It can be observed that all the produced films exhibited a compact and non-
346
porous structure. The ST film showed granular particles (zone marked by a yellow circle, Fig.
347
6a), which may be associated to retrograde starch. Furthermore, the ST/L blend (Fig. 6b)
348
display rod-like lignin particles embedded within the starch matrix. The presence of these
349
fiber-like lignin particles indicates that lignin acts as filler and has been successfully blended
350
within the starch matrix, which might be the reason for the strong interaction between these
351
two biopolymers. Interestingly, SEM image of ST/L blend and ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites
352
(Fig. 6) showed that many small fibers align inside a larger single fiber of lignin.
353
Additionally,
SEM
images
of
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
the
ST/L-GO
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
354
(Fig. 6c,d) revealed that the produced films exhibited a more compact and closed
355
microstructures.
356
4.2.4. Mechanical Properties Measurement
357
The mechanical properties of polymers are of great importance especially for a versatile
358
application in food packaging. Mechanical testing provides significant information about the
359
stiffness or brittleness of the prepared bio-nanocomposites. Tensile tests were carried out to
360
investigate the effect of the addition of lignin and incorporation of GO nanosheets on the
361
mechanical properties of the resulting ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposite films. The ST/L weight
362
ratio was fixed at 50wt%. The mechanical properties of the neat starch, ST/L blend and
363
ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites at different GO loading were measured from the stress-strain
364
curves of the corresponding bio-nanocomposites film. The tensile properties, namely Young’s
365
modulus (E, MPa), tensile strength (σ, MPa) and elongation at break (ε, %) of neat starch,
366
ST/L blend and ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites are shown in Fig. 7. It was difficult to obtain
367
film from lignin so its mechanical properties were not mentioned. As can be seen from Fig. 7,
368
both Young’s modulus (Fig. 7a) and tensile strength (Fig. 7b) of the ST/L biofilms increased
369
and the elongation at break values decreased owing to the occurrence of strong interaction
370
between the functional groups of starch and lignin. This improvement may arise from the
371
good compatibility between the hydrophobic lignin and the hydrophilic starch moieties in the
372
presence of glycerol, which acts as a compatibilization agent and contributes to the miscibility
373
of the twophases.66 Similarly, Ҫalgeris et al.64 reported that the addition of lignin extracted
374
from hazelnut shells to plasticized starch matrix greatly improves the mechanical strength of
375
the ST/L biofilms. The evidence of the occurrence of strong interfacial interactions between
376
starch and lignin was confirmed by the FTIR spectra of the ST/L film (Fig.4). As expected,
377
both Young’s modulus and tensile strength were significantly improved after incorporation of
378
increasing amount of GO (Fig. 7a,b). The E and σ increased from 32 and 3.37 MPa to 60.23
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 40
Page 17 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
379
and 5 MPa when the GO loading increased from 0 to 0.7wt%, respectively. The mechanical
380
properties enhancement was probably due to the interfacial interactions between the
381
biopolymer matrices and exfoliated GO nanosheets. These results are in good agreement with
382
the previous studies, indicating that the addition of well-dispersed GO as a reinforcement can
383
significantly enhance the resultant mechanical properties of several biopolymeric matrices
384
such as starch,67 alginate,68 polylactic acid69 and carboxymethyl cellulose.70 The elongation at
385
break (ε) does not follows the same tendency as E and σ, and decreased from 13,68 to 9.07%
386
after incorporation of increasing amount of GO from 0.3 to 0.7wt% (Fig. 7c). The significant
387
improvement in mechanical properties of ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposite films, mainly E and σ,
388
was due to the strong interaction between GO and ST/L matrix and the good dispersion of GO
389
within the ST/L matrix. The GO nanofiller, with their abundant oxygen-containing functional
390
groups, formed an interconnected network linked by strong hydrogen-bonding interaction and
391
becomes difficult to disconnect from the ST/L matrix. Moreover, the substantial enhancement
392
of the Young’s modulus (E) and tensile strength (σ) could also be due to the resistance of GO
393
to the imposed force and the applied stress. Similar results were also reported when the starch
394
was reinforced by nanofiller.71,72
395
4.2.5. UV-Vis Absorbance of the films
396
The UV-Vis spectra of pure ST, ST/L blend and ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites films are
397
depicted in Fig. 8a. Since the ST film is transparent in the UV-Vis region, a very low
398
absorption level was obtained. Once blended with lignin, the absorption of the ST/L blend
399
was found to increase, suggesting that the transparence of the prepared film was reduced. The
400
lignin containing film was brown in color as shown in Figure 1. Additionally, when
401
increasing the amounts of GO were added to the ST/L blend, the absorption level was
402
increased gradually and follow the subsequent order: ST/L-0.3< ST/L-0.5< ST/L-0.7 (Fig.
403
8a). These results revealed that the transparency of ST/L was affected by the incorporation of
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
404
GO nanosheets. This behavior is expected since the color of the ST/L-GO bio-
405
nanocomposites was found to darken as the GO amount was increased (Fig.1).
406
4.2.6. Moisture uptake of the films
407
The moisture uptake (Mu) of neat ST, ST/L blend and ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites films
408
are depicted in Fig.8b. Pure starch is well known to be sensitive to water and moisture due to
409
its hydrophilic character. As shown in Fig. 8b, the Mu value of the neat ST film, after
410
exposition to an environmental relative humidity of 70% for 6h, was approximately 12.36%.
411
Moreover, it can be clearly seen that blending lignin within the starch matrix significantly
412
reduced the moisture uptake percentage of the resulting ST/L blend to 9.2%. This decrease in
413
water uptake at equilibrium can be ascribed to the partial miscibility of hydrophobic phenolic
414
compounds of lignin with the starch matrix and also to the reduction of the free hydrophilic
415
functional groups of starch witch form strong interactions within the oxygen containing
416
groups of lignin.73After the addition of an increasing amount of GO as a nanofiller, the
417
moisture uptake values were further reduced to 5.71, 5.16 and 5.15% for ST/L-GO-0.3, ST/L-
418
GO-0.5 and ST/L-GO-0.7, respectively. This decrease in the moisture uptake could be
419
assigned to the improvement of the hydrophobic nature of the ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites
420
films and the possible occurrence of stronginterfacial interaction between the oxygen-
421
containing groups of GO and those of ST/L biopolymeric matrix, which reduce the water
422
accessibility and therfore the ability of the prepared bio-nanocomposites to absorb moisture.
423
4.2.7. Water swelling capacity of the films
424
The water swelling is one of the most significant disadvantages of a biopolymer especially for
425
packaging application. The water swelling capacity of the ST, ST/L blend and ST/L-GO bio-
426
nanocomposite films loaded with different GO contents is shown in Fig. 8c. The examination
427
of this figure revealed that the water swelling (SW) of the starch film was slightly decreased
428
after addition of lignin owing to the hydrophobic nature of lignin molecule. The SW values of
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 40
Page 19 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
429
starch and lignin, after immersion in water for 24h, were 50.06 and 47.82%, respectively. At
430
GO loading of 0.3 and 0.5wt%, no significant improvement of the water uptake was observed,
431
whereas when increasing the amout of GO was used (0.7wt%) the water swelling was found
432
to decrease to 35.07%in comparison to 50 and 48% for neat ST and ST/L blend film,
433
respectively (Fig. 8c). These results suggest that theincoporation of an increasing amount of
434
GO could significantly improve the hydrophobicity of the ST/L blend films and therfore limit
435
the absorption of water by the ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites films. Indeed, the presence of a
436
well dispersed GO nanosheets resulted in the occurence of a strong interfacial interaction
437
between the biopolymeric ST/L matrix and GO nanofiller, which resulted in the formation of
438
an interconnected network and water molecules cannot diffuse inside the bio-nanocomposite
439
film, thus preventing the absoprtion of water of the films when immersed in water and
440
decreasing the water swelling ability.72The obtained results are in good agreement with those
441
of TGA curve (Fig. 5a) since the water content, which is absorbed from the moisiture, of the
442
prepared bio-nanocomposites films decreased with an increasing amount of GO from 0.3 to
443
0.7wt%. These findings are in good argeement with those reported by Khan et al.70when
444
using GO as a nanofiller in polymeric blends.
445 446
4.2.8. Water vapor permeability of the films
447
Water vapor permeability of ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposite is one of the most important
448
features for the substitution of traditional polymers, particularly, for packaging applications.
449
Conventionally, films must limit or at least reduce moisture transfer between food and the
450
external environment. The WVP of neat ST and ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposite films at
451
different GO loading are given in Figure 8d. It was clearly observed that the values of WVP
452
for
453
ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposite were lower than that of neat ST. The WVP of the neat starch
454
was around 11.43 g m/m2 h Pa. This value was found to decrease when ST was blended with 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
455
lignin and filled with 0.3wt% of GO to reach 3.86 g m/m2 h Pa (Fig. 8d). After addition of
456
increasing amount of GO, the WVP of the prepared ST/L-GO films was found to decrease
457
following the loading level of GO. When GO loading was increased from 0.3 to 0.7wt%, the
458
WVP was found to decrease from 3.86 to 3.74 g m/m2 h Pa, respectively. These results could
459
be explained by the formation of a strong hydrogen bonding between GO and the blend
460
matrix which reduce the diffusion of water in the films and produce a tortuous pathway for
461
the water molecules.74,75
462
4.2.9. Hydrolytic degradation of the films
463
The hydrolytic degradation experiments were performed in water-based environment during
464
30 days in order to study the effect of blending starch with lignin biopolymer on the
465
hydrolytic degradation of ST/L blend film and also to investigate the effect of the
466
incorporation of GO as a nano-reinforcement on the long-term hydrolytic degradation of
467
ST/L-GO films. Fig.8a shows the photographs of pure ST, ST/L blend and ST/L-GO films
468
immersed in water. The digital images are taken at t = 5 min and t = 30 days in order to
469
monitor their state and check the possible visual degradation of the films.
470
It is prominent that starch is highly sensitive to water. After immersion in water for 30 days,
471
the starch film seems to keep rather good morphological dimensions, but it becomes brittle
472
and easy to break. The residual mass measured for this sample after the removal of water and
473
drying (Fig. 8b) was found to be 40.43% indicating that the major part of ST is hydrolyzed in
474
water media. This is mainly due to the presence of free hydroxyl groups, which have a high
475
affinity to water. When lignin was blended within ST matrix, the hydrolytic degradation of
476
the resulting ST/L blend was slightly reduced when compared to neat ST owing to the
477
reduction of the free hydroxyl groups of ST, which interact with those of hydrophobic lignin.
478
As shown in Fig.8b, a slight increase of the residual mass to 41.02% was observed,
479
suggesting that the starch was well blended with the lignin, which reduces the ability of water
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 40
Page 21 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
480
for degradation mechanism. However, the partial degradation of ST/L blend could be ascribed
481
to the existence of free oxygen-containing functional groups remaining in the ST/L blend,
482
which favorably interact with water thus resulting in hydrolysis mechanism. In the case of
483
ST/L-GO, no visual degradation was detected since the bio-nanocomposite films still
484
maintain a good morphological aspect (Fig.8a). The remaining weight increases by increasing
485
the amount of GO (Fig. 8b). Indeed, the residual mass increased from 45.35 to 65.21wt%
486
when the GO loading was increased from 0.3 to 0.7wt%, respectively. This resistance to the
487
hydrolytic degradation might be due to the occurrence of additional interaction between the
488
free oxygen-containing functional groups of ST/L blend and the oxygenated groups of GO as
489
established by FTIR analysis (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the highly dispersed GO nanofiller in the
490
polymeric matrix resulted in the formation of a tortuous path, which limits the penetration of
491
water and therefore reduces the hydrolytic degradation of the produced bio-nanocomposites.76
492
These results are in good agreement with those reported by El achaby et al.77 when using
493
2wt% of GO filled chitosan/poly(vinylpyrrolidone) blend.
494 495
5. Conclusion
496
In this study, films based on ST/L biopolymer blend reinforced by GO were successfully
497
prepared via casting/solvent evaporation process. FTIR measurements revealed that the lignin
498
was successfully blended within the starch matrix via the occurrence of hydrogen bond
499
interactions, which resulted in the formation of a homogenous biocompatible blend matrix.
500
After the addition of GO, additional interactions were found to occur between the non-
501
interaction hydroxyls groups of starch and lignin and the oxygen containing groups of GO,
502
resulting in the formation of an interconnected network. Owing to these interactions, the
503
resulting properties of the prepared bio-nanocomposites such as water swelling, moisture
504
uptake, hydrolytic degradation, water vapor permeability, thermal stability and mechanical
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 22 of 40
505
properties were significantly improved. As a conclusion, our findings confirmed the
506
effectiveness of the proposed approach to produce biodegradable films with enhanced
507
properties, which may be a suitable candidate for food packaging applications.
508 509
Acknowledgements
510
The financial assistance of the MAScIR Foundation, towards this research is hereby
511
acknowledged. We acknowledge also the financial assistance of the CNRST (Grant PPR2
512
Project, Category B).
513 514 515
6. Reference
516
1. Rodríguez-González, C.; Martínez-Hernández, A.L.; Castaño, V.M.; Kharissova,
517
O.V.; Ruoff, R.S.; Velasco-Santos, C. Polysaccharide Nanocomposites Reinforced
518
with Graphene Oxide and Keratin-Grafted Graphene Oxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
519
2012, 51, 3619-3629.
520
2. Raemdonck, K.; Martens, T.F.; Braeckmans, K.; Demeester, J.; De Smedt, S.C.
521
Polysaccharide-based systems in drug and gene delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013,
522
65, 1123-1147.
523 524 525 526 527 528
3. Bordes,
P.;
Pollet,
E.;
Avérous,
L.;
Nano-biocomposites:
Biodegradable
polyester/nanoclay systems. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 125-155. 4. Siracusa, V.; Rocculi, P.; Romani, S.; Rosa, M.D. Biodegradable polymers for food packaging: a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 634-643. 5. Curvelo, A.A.S.; de Carvalho, A.J.F.; Agnelli, J.A.M.; Thermoplastic starch-cellulosic fibers composites: preliminary results. Carbohy. Polym. 2001, 45, 183-188.
529
6. Avella, M.; De Vlieger, J.J.; Errico, M.E.; Fischer, S.; Vacca, P.; Volpe, M.G.
530
Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food
531
Chem. 2005, 93, 467-474.
532
7. Chung, Y.-L.; Ansari, S.; Estevez, L.; Hayrapetyan, S.; Giannelis, E.P.; Lai, H.-M.
533
Preparation and properties of biodegradable starch–clay nanocomposites. Carbohy.
534
Polym. 2010, 79, 391-396. 22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 40
535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
8. Huang, M.-F.; Yu, J.-G.; Ma, X.-F. Studies on the properties of Montmorillonitereinforced thermoplastic starch composites. Polymer 2004, 45, 7017-7023. 9. Guan, J.; Eskridge, K.M.; Hanna, M.A. Acetylated starch-polylactic acid loose-fill packaging materials. Ind. Crops Prod. 2005, 22, 109-123. 10. Ou, S.; Li A.; Yang, A. A study on synthesis of starch ferulate and its biological properties. Food Chem. 2001, 74, 91-95. 11. Rehman, Z.; Shah, W.H. Thermal heat processing effects on antinutrients, protein and starch digestibility of food legumes. Food Chem. 2005, 91, 327-331. 12. Mooney, B.P. The second green revolution? Production of plant-based biodegradable plastics. Biochem. J. 2009, 418, 219-232.
545
13. Girones, J.; Lopez, J.P.; Mutje, P.; Carvalho, A.J.F.; Curvelo, A.A.S.; Vilaseca, F.
546
Natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic starch composites obtained by melt processing.
547
Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 858-863.
548
14. Da Róz, A.L.; Ferreira, A.M.; Yamaji, F.M.; Carvalho, A.J.F. Compatible blends of
549
thermoplastic starch and hydrolyzed ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers. Carbohydr.
550
Polym. 2012, 90, 34-40.
551
15. Chillo, S.; Flores, S.; Mastromatteo, M.; Conte, A.; Gerschenson, L.; Del Nobile,
552
M.A. Influence of glycerol and chitosan on tapioca starch-based edible film properties.
553
J. Food Eng. 2008, 88, 159-168.
554 555 556 557 558 559
16. Kim, M., Lee, S.-J. Characteristics of crosslinked potato starch and starch-filled linear low-density polyethylene films. Carbohy. Polym. 2002, 50, 331-337. 17. Bourtoom, T.; Chinnan, M.S. Preparation and properties of rice starch-chitosan blend biodegradable film. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 1633-1641. 18. Sionkowska, A. Current research on the blends of natural and synthetic polymers as new biomaterials: Review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 1254-1276.
560
19. Prachayawarakorn, J.; Sangnitidej, P.; Boonpasith, P. Properties of thermoplastic rice
561
starch composites reinforced by cotton fiber or low-density polyethylene. Carbohy.
562
Polym. 2010, 81, 425-433.
563 564 565 566
20. Kaewtatip, K.; Thongmee, J. Studies on the structure and properties of thermoplastic starch/luffa fiber composites. Mater. Des. 2012, 40, 314-318. 21. Kaewtatip, K.; Tanrattanakul, V. Structure and properties of pregelatinized cassava starch/kaolin composites. Mater. Des. 2012, 37, 423-428.
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
567
22. Müller, C.M.O.; Laurindo, J.B.; Yamashita, F. Effect of nanoclay incorporation
568
method on mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of starch-based films. Ind.
569
Crops Prod. 2011, 33, 605-610.
570 571
23. Hu, G., Chen, J.; Gao, J. Preparation and characteristics of oxidized potato starch films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 76, 291-298.
572
24. Kim, K. W.; Ko, C.J.; Park, H.J. Mechanical Properties, Water Vapor Permeabilities
573
and Solubilities of Highly Carboxymethylated Starch-Based Edible Films. J. Food Sci.
574
2002, 67, 218-222.
575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582
25. López, O.V.; García, M.A.; Zaritzky, N.E. Film forming capacity of chemically modified corn starches. Carbohy. Polym. 2008, 73, 573-581. 26. Glasser W.G.; Northey R.A.; Schultz T.P. Lignin: Historical, biological, and materials perspectives. American Chemical Society 2000, 742. 27. Thomas Q. Hu. Q. Chemical modification, properties, and usage of lignin. Plenum Press. 2002. 28. Gordobil, O.; Egüés, I.; Llano-Ponte, R.; Labidi, J. Physicochemical properties of PLA lignin blends. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 108, 330-338.
583
29. Kadla, J.F.; Kubo, S. Lignin-based polymer blends: analysis of intermolecular
584
interactions in lignin-synthetic polymer blends. Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf.
585
AIChE 2004, 35, 395-400.
586
30. Spiridon, I.; Teaca, C.-A.; Bodirlau, R. Preparation and characterization of adipic
587
acid-modified starch microparticles/plasticized starch composite films reinforced by
588
lignin. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 3241-3251.
589
31. Baumberger, S.; Lapierre, C.; Monties, B.; Lourdin, D.; Colonna, P. Preparation and
590
properties of thermally moulded and cast lignosulfonates-starch blends. Ind. Crops
591
Prod. 1997, 6, 253-258.
592
32. Vengal, J. C.; Srikumar, M. Processing and study of novellignin-starch and lignin-
593
gelatin biodegradable polymeric films. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs. 2005, 18, 237-
594
241.
595 596
33. Stevens, E.S.; Willett, J.L.; Shogren, R.L, Thermoplastic Starch-Kraft Lignin-Glycerol Blends. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2007, 1, 351-359.
597
34. Baumberger, S.; Lapierre, C.; Monties, B.; Valle, G.D. Use of kraft lignin as filler for
598
starch films. Polym. Degrad. Stab. Biodegradable Polymers and Macromolecules
599
1998, 59, 273-277.
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 40
Page 25 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
600
35. Baumberger, S.; Michon, C.; Cuvelier, G.; Lapierre, C. Lignin utilization in starch
601
thermoplastics: towards molecular origin of polymer compatibility. In Proceedings of
602
the Sixth European Workshop on Lignocellulosics and Pulps 2000, 121-124.
603 604 605 606 607 608
36. Baumberger, S. Chemical Modification, Properties, and Usage of Lignin. Kluwer Academic, Plenum Publishers 2002, 1-20. 37. Bodirlau, R.; Teaca, C.-A.; Spiridon, I. Influence of natural fillers on the properties of starch-based biocomposite films. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 44, 575-583. 38. Kaewtatip, K.; Thongmee, J. Effect of kraft lignin and esterified lignin on the properties of thermoplastic starch. Mater. Des. 2013, 49, 701-704.
609
39. Miranda, C.S.; Ferreira, M.S.; Magalhães, M.T.; Santos, W.J.; Oliveira, J.C.; Silva,
610
J.B.A.; José, N.M. Mechanical, Thermal and Barrier Properties of Starch-based Films
611
Plasticized with Glycerol and Lignin and Reinforced with Cellulose Nanocrystals.
612
Mater. Today Proc., ANM 2014: 5th International conference on Advanced
613
Nanomaterials 2015, 2, 63-69.
614
40. Miranda, C.S.; Ferreira, M.S.; Magalhães, M.T.; Bispo, A.P.G.; Oliveira, J.C.; Silva,
615
J.B.A.; José, N.M. Starch-based Films Plasticized with Glycerol and Lignin from
616
Piassava Fiber Reinforced with Nanocrystals from Eucalyptus. Mater. Today Proc.,
617
ANM 2014: 5th International conference on Advanced Nanomaterials 2015, 2, 134-
618
140.
619 620 621 622
41. Chivrac, F.; Pollet, E.; Avérous, L. Progress in nano-biocomposites based on polysaccharides and nanoclays. Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep. 2009, 67, 1-17. 42. Paul, D.R.; Robeson, L.M. Polymer nanotechnology: Nanocomposites. Polymer 2008, 49, 3187-3204.
623
43. Avella, M.; Vlieger, J. J. D.; Errico, M. E.; Fischer, S.; Vacca, P.; Volpe, M. G.
624
Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food
625
Chemistry 2005, 93, 467-474.
626
44. Chung, Y.-L.; Ansari, S.; Estevez, L.; Hayrapetyan, S.; Giannelis, E.P.; Lai, H.-M.
627
Preparation and properties of biodegradable starch–clay nanocomposites. Carbohy.
628
Polym. 2010, 79, 391-396.
629
45. Sanchez-Garcia, M.D.; Lagaron, J.M.; Hoa, S.V. Effect of addition of carbon
630
nanofibers and carbon nanotubes on properties of thermoplastic biopolymers.
631
Compos. Sci. Technol., Special issue on Chiral Smart Honeycombs 2010, 70, 1095-
632
1105.
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 26 of 40
633
46. Rodríguez-González, C.; Martínez-Hernández, A.L.; Castaño, V.M.; Kharissova,
634
O.V.; Ruoff, R.S.; Velasco-Santos, C. Polysaccharide Nanocomposites Reinforced
635
with Graphene Oxide and Keratin-Grafted Graphene Oxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
636
2012, 51, 3619-3629.
637
47. Chung, Y.-L.; Ansari, S.; Estevez, L.; Hayrapetyan, S.; Giannelis, E.P.; Lai, H.-M.
638
Preparation and properties of biodegradable starch–clay nanocomposites. Carbohy.
639
Polym. 2010, 79, 391-396.
640
48. Goffin, A.-L.; Raquez, J.-M.; Duquesne, E.; Siqueira, G.; Habibi, Y.; Dufresne, A.;
641
Dubois, P.From Interfacial Ring-Opening Polymerization to Melt Processing of
642
Cellulose
643
Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 2456-2465.
644 645 646 647
Nanowhisker-Filled
Polylactide-Based
Nanocomposites.
49. Rouf, T. B.; Kokini, J. L. Biodegradable biopolymer–graphene nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science 2016, 51, 9915-9945. 50. Kim, H.; Abdala, A. A.; Macosko, C. W. Graphene/Polymer Nanocomposites. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 6515-6530.
648
51. Jiang, L.; Shen, X.-P.; Wu, J.-L.; Shen, K.-C. Preparation and characterization of
649
graphene/poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.2010, 118, 275-
650
279.
651
52. Wei, T.; Luo, G.; Fan, Z. J.; Zheng, C.; Yan, J.; Yao, C. Z. Preparation of graphene
652
nanosheet/polymer composites using in situ reduction-extractive dispersion. Carbon
653
2009, 47, 2296-2299.
654
53. Kai, W.; Hirota, Y.; Hua, L.; Inoue, Y. Thermal and mechanical properties of a
655
poly(ϵ-caprolactone)/graphite oxide composite. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 107, 1395-
656
1400.
657 658
54. Hummers, W.S.; Offeman, R.E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339-1339.
659
55. Standard Practice for Maintaining Constant Relative Humidity by Means of Aqueous
660
Solutions, ASTM Standard E104-51 (reapproved 1971), American society for testing
661
and materials, Philadelphia, PA (1986)
662 663
56. Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials, ASTM Standard E96-90, procedure D.
664
57. Wang, G., Wang, B., Park, J., Yang, J., Shen, X., Yao, J., Synthesis of enhanced
665
hydrophilic and hydrophobic graphene oxide nanosheets by a solvothermal method.
666
Carbon 2009, 47, 68-72. 26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 40
667 668
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
58. Chandra, S.; Sahu, S.; Pramanik, P.A novel synthesis of graphene by dichromate oxidation. Materials Science and Engineering B 2010, 167, 133-136.
669
59. Paredes, J.I.; Villar-Rodil, S.; Martínez-Alonso, A.; Tascón, J.M.D. Graphene oxide
670
dispersions in organic solvents. Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids 2008, 24, 10560-
671
10564.
672
60. Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D.A.; Piner, R.D.; Kohlhaas, K.A.; Kleinhammes, A.; Jia, Y.;
673
Wu, Y.; Nguyen, S.T.; Ruoff, R.S. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via
674
chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 2007, 45, 1558-1565.
675
61. Prachayawarakorn, J.; Sangnitidej, P.; Boonpasith, P. Properties of thermoplastic rice
676
starch composites reinforced by cotton fiber or low-density polyethylene. Carbohydr.
677
Polym. 2010, 81, 425-433.
678 679
62. Kaewtatip, K.; Thongmee, J. Studies on the structure and properties of thermoplastic starch/luffa fiber composites. Mater. Des. 2012, 40, 314-318.
680
63. Prachayawarakorn, J.; Ruttanabus, P.; Boonsom, P. Effect of Cotton Fiber Contents
681
and Lengths on Properties of Thermoplastic Starch Composites Prepared from Rice
682
and Waxy Rice Starches. J. Polym. Environ. 2011, 19, 274-282.
683
64. Çalgeris, Đ.; Çakmakçı, E.; Ogan, A.; Kahraman, M.V.; Kayaman-Apohan, N.
684
Preparation and drug release properties of lignin–starch biodegradable films. Starch-
685
Stärke 2012, 64, 399-407.
686
65. El Achaby, M.; El Miri, N.; Snik, A.; Zahouily, M.; Abdelouahdi, K.; Fihri, A.;
687
Barakat, A.; Solhy, A. Mechanically strong nanocomposite films based on highly
688
filled carboxymethyl cellulose with graphene oxide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133,
689
42356.
690
66. Vengal, J. C.; Srikumar, M. Processing and study of novel lignin-starch and lignin-
691
gelatin biodegradable polymeric films. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs. 2005, 18, 237-
692
241.
693 694
67. Li, R.; Liu, C.; Ma, J. Studies on the properties of graphene oxide-reinforced starch biocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 631-637.
695
68. Ionita, M.; Pandele, M.A.; Iovu, H. Sodium alginate/graphene oxide composite films
696
with enhanced thermal and mechanical properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94, 339-
697
344.
698
69. Li, W.; Xu, Z.; Chen, L.; Shan, M.; Tian, X.; Yang, C.; Lv, H.; Qian, X. A facile
699
method to produce graphene oxide-g-poly(L-lactic acid) as an promising
700
reinforcement for PLLA nanocomposites. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 237, 291-299. 27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 28 of 40
701
70. Wang, J.; Feng, M.; Zhan, H. Preparation, characterization, and nonlinear optical
702
properties of graphene oxide-carboxymethyl cellulose composite films. Opt. Laser
703
Technol. 2014, 57, 84-89.
704 705 706 707
71. Ma, X.; Yu, J.; Wang, N. Glycerol plasticized-starch/multiwall carbon nanotube composites for electroactive polymers. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 268-273. 72. Li, R.; Liu, C.; Ma, J. Studies on the properties of graphene oxide-reinforced starch biocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 631-637.
708
73. Lepifre, S.; Baumberger, S.; Pollet, B.; Cazaux, F.; Coqueret, X.; Lapierre, C.
709
Reactivity of sulphur-free alkali lignins within starch films. Ind. Crops Prod., 6th
710
International Lignin Institute conference 2004, 20, 219-230.
711
74. Bai, H.; Sun, Y.; Xu, J.; Dong, W.; Liu, X. Rheological and structural characterization
712
of HA/PVA-SbQ composites film-forming solutions and resulting films as affected by
713
UV irradiation time. Carbohydrate Polymers 2015, 115, 422-431.
714
75. Yadollahi, M.; Namazi, H.; Barkhordari, S. Preparation and properties of
715
carboxymethyl
cellulose/layered
double
716
Carbohydrate Polymers 2014, 108, 83-90.
hydroxide
bionanocomposite
films.
717
76. Han, D.; Yan, L.; Chen, W.; Li, W. Preparation of chitosan/graphene oxide composite
718
film with enhanced mechanical strength in the wet state. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83,
719
653-658.
720
77. El Achaby, M.; Essamlali, Y.; El Miri, N.; Snik, A.; Abdelouahdi, K.; Fihri, A.;
721
Zahouily, M.; Solhy, A. Graphene oxide reinforced chitosan/polyvinylpyrrolidone
722
polymer bio-nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 41042, 1-11.
28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
723
Figure captions:
724
Figure 1. Digital images of ST, ST/L blend and ST/L-GO films forming solutions and the
725
corresponding isolated solid films.
726
Figure 2. XRD patterns (left)and FTIR spectra (right) of (a) graphite and (b)graphite oxide
727
Figure 3. (a) SEM micrograph of graphene oxide nanosheets, (b) TEM micrograph of
728
graphene oxide nanosheets, (c) HR-TEM image of graphene oxide, (d) Electron diffraction
729
pattern from SAED measurements for graphene oxide sample and (e) AFM image and the
730
corresponding line profiles of the GO nanosheets.
731
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of ST, lignin, ST/L blend, ST/L-0.3, ST/L-0.5and ST/L-0.7 bio-
732
nanocomposites films and GO powder in the region of (a) 600-4000 cm-1 and (b)
733
1600-600 cm-1.
734
Figure 5. (a) TGA and (b) DTG curves of neat ST, ST/L blend, ST/L-0.3, ST/L-0.5 and
735
ST/L-0.7 bio-nanocomposite films. Inset in figure 5a TGA curve in temperature range of 250-
736
500°C.
737
Figure 6. SEM micrographs of (a) neat starch, (b) ST/L blend, (c) ST/L-0.3 and (d) ST/L-0.7
738
films. Regions surrounded by yellow circle indicate granular particles.
739
Figure 7. Mechanical properties of ST, ST/L blend and ST/L-0.3, ST/L-0.5 and ST/L-0.7: (a)
740
Young’s modulus, (b) Tensile strength hand (c)Elongation at break.
741
Figure 8. (a)UV-Vis spectra, (b) Moisture uptake, (c) Water swelling and (d) Water vapor
742
permeability of neat ST, ST/L blend and ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposite films loaded with
743
different GO loading (0.3, 0.5 and 0.7wt%).
744
Figure 9. (a)Photographs of neat ST, ST/L blend and ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposites
745
immersed in water for 5 min and 30 days, (b) Residual mass of neat ST, ST/L blend and
746
ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposite loaded with different GO amount after a degradation period of
747
30 days 29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
748
Figure graphics:
749
Figure 1.
750 751
30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 40
Page 31 of 40
752
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2.
Transmittance (%)
Intensity (a.u)
d002 = 0.336 nm d002 = 0.88 nm
(b)
(b) C-O-C
(a)
(a) C-C
OH
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
C-O
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 -1
2θ (°)
Wavenumber (cm )
753
31 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
754
Figure 3.
755 756
32 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 32 of 40
Page 33 of 40
757
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4. (a)
ST
(b) ST -1
1152 cm
% Transmitance (a.u)
% Transmitance (a.u)
Lignin ST/L ST/L-0.3 ST/L-0.5 ST/L-0.7 C-H
GO
C-H
1159 cm
4000
1714 cm -1 1612 cm
OH
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1152 cm
ST/L-0.3
-1
1002 cm
-1
1152 cm
ST/L-0.5
-1
1002 cm
-1
1148 cm
ST/L-0.7
-1
999 cm -1
1134 cm C-O
-1
989 cm
1000
1500
-1
758
ST/L
-1
1036 cm -1
-1
OH
Lignin
-1
1008 cm -1
1250
1000
750 -1
Wavenumbers (cm )
Wavenumbers (cm )
759
33 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 5.
Weight (%)
Weight loss (%)
80
2 1,6
60
40
1,4
5
20
60
1 0 250
300
350
400
450
500
Temperature (°C)
40
1: ST 2: ST/L 3: ST/L-0.3 4: ST/L-0.5 5: ST/L-0.7
20
0
(b) (b)
1,8
(a)
80
100
Deriv. Weight (%/°C)
760
Page 34 of 40
5 1
1,2 1,0
3
0,8 0,6 0,4
3
5
100
200
0,2 0,0
-20
-0,2 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0
Temperature (°C)
300
400
500
Temperature (°C)
761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 34 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
600
700
800
Page 35 of 40
784
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 6.
785
786 787 788
35 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
789
Figure 7. 70
Young's modulus (MPa)
(a) 60 50 40 30 ST
Tensile strength (MPa)
5,4 4,8
ST/L
ST/L-0.3 ST/L-0.5 ST/L-0.7
ST/L
ST/L-0.3 ST/L-0.5 ST/L-0.7
ST/L
ST/L-0.3 ST/L-0.5 ST/L-0.7
(b)
4,2 3,6 3,0 2,4 1,8 1,2 ST
Elongation at break (%)
24
790 791
(c)
20 16 12 8 ST
36 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 36 of 40
Page 37 of 40
Figure 8. 3,0
14
5
1. ST 2. ST/L blend 3. ST/L-0.3 4. ST/L-0.5 5. ST/L-0.7 6. GO
Absorbance (a.u)
2,5 2,0 1,5 1,0
4 3
(a)
6 2
0,5
1
(b)
12
Moisiture uptake (%)
792 793
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
0,0
10 8 6 4 2 0
400
500
600
700
800
ST
ST/L
ST/L-0.3 ST/L-0.5 ST/L-0.7
Wavelenght (nm) 60
12 10
WVP (g m/m h Pa)
40
8
2
Swelling (%)
50
30 20 10 0
6 4 2 0
ST
794 795
(d)
(c)
ST/L
ST/L-0.3 ST/L-0.5 ST/L-0.7
ST
A
796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 37 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ST/L-0.3
ST/L-0.5
ST/L-0.7
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
817 818
Figure 9.
819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 38 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 38 of 40
Page 39 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
843
Scheme
844
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of the structure of the ST/L-GO bio-nanocomposite film
845
and the possible interactions between starch, lignin and GO nanosheets.
846
847 848
39 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
849
TOC Graphic:
850 851
852 853
40 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 40 of 40