Stereoselective Analysis and Dissipation of Propiconazole in Wheat

Dec 16, 2016 - Email a Colleague · Order Reprints · Rights & Permissions · Citation Alerts · Add to ACS ChemWorx. SciFinder Subscribers Sign in · Retr...
0 downloads 8 Views 792KB Size
Subscriber access provided by Olson Library | Northern Michigan University

Article

Stereoselective Analysis and Dissipation of Propiconazole in Wheat, Grapes, and Soil by Supercritical Fluid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Youpu Cheng, Yongquan Zheng, Fengshou Dong, Jing Li, Yaofang Zhang, Shuhong Sun, Ning Li, Xin-Yi Cui, Yuanhong Wang, Xinglu Pan, and Weilong Zhang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04623 • Publication Date (Web): 16 Dec 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 19, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Stereoselective Analysis and Dissipation of Propiconazole in Wheat, Grape s, and

2

Soil by Supercritical Fluid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

3

Youpu Cheng,*,‡ Yongquan Zheng,*,† Fengshou Dong,† Jing Li,§ Yaofang Zhang,‡

4

Shuhong Sun,‡ Ning Li,‡ Xinyi Cui,‡ Yuanhong Wang,‡ Xinglu Pan,† and

5

Weilong Zhang‡

6 7 8 9



State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of

Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China ffi

Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin, China

§

Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-products, Tianjin

10

Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, China

11

* Corresponding author (Tel: +86-22-23781301; Fax: +86-22-23781315; E-mail:

12

[email protected])

13

-1ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

14

ABSTRACT: An efficient and sensitive chiral analytical method was established for

15

the determination of propiconazole stereoisomers by supercritical fluid

16

chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-MS/MS). Stereoisomeric separation

17

was performed on a Chiralpak AD-3 column with CO2/ethanol (93:7) as the mobile

18

phase. The four propiconazole stereoisomers were well separated in 4.7 min with

19

resolutions above 2.0. The specificity, linearity, matrix effects, accuracy, precision,

20

and stability of the developed method were evaluated. The stereoselective dissipation

21

of propiconazole in wheat straw, grape, and soil samples was investigated by the

22

proposed method. The results indicated that significant stereoselective degradation

23

occurred in wheat straw and grapes, with preferential degradation of (-)-propiconazole

24

A and (+)-propiconazole B in wheat straw and the opposite case in grapes. No

25

enantioselectivity was observed in soil, although diastereoisomer A degraded faster

26

than diastereoisomer B. These results could contribute to a more accurate assessment

27

of the environmental risk and food safety of propiconazole.

28

KEYWORDS: propiconazole, stereoselective analysis, SFC-MS/MS, wheat, grapes

29

-2ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 40

Page 3 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

30

INTRODUCTION

31

Propiconazole

32

(cis-trans-1-[[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]methyl]-1H-1,2,4-tri

33

azole) is a broad-spectrum systemic triazole fungicide with prominent protective and

34

curative properties. This fungicide has been widely used to control powdery mildew,

35

rusts, and leaf spot on wheat, grapes, turf and hardwoods, among others.1 However,

36

this compound is associated with a higher incidence of liver tumors (benign and

37

malignant) in long-term fed male mice,2, 3 and the U.S. EPA has identified it as a

38

possible human carcinogen.4

39

Propiconazole has two asymmetrically substituted C atoms and thus exists as two

40

pairs of enantiomers. The four stereoisomers are separated into cis [(2R, 4S) and (2S,

41

4R)], 1 and 2, and trans [(2R, 4R) and (2S, 4S)], 3 and 4, configurations (Figure 1).5

42

Similar to most chiral pesticides, propiconazole has been produced and used to date in

43

the form of a mixture of the four stereoisomers. Commonly, the enantiomers of the

44

same chiral compound have identical physicochemical properties and abiotic

45

degradation rates.6, 7 However, a large difference may be exhibited between their

46

individual bioactivities, toxicities, or metabolism when the stereoisomers are exposed

47

to asymmetric chemical or biological systems, and the dissipation or bioaccumulation

48

of the stereoisomers in organisms or the environment is often stereoselective.8, 9 Thus,

49

the data from conventional analyses that have treated stereoisomers as one compound

50

are incomplete and nonspecific. It is essential to study stereoselectivity of a chiral

51

pesticide in plants and the environment to accurately evaluate food safety and -3ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

52

environmental risk.10 For propiconazole, the biological activity of each stereoisomer

53

was shown to vary with pathogens.11 Stereoisomers with absolute configuration 2S

54

were more efficient inhibitors of ergosterol biosynthesis in Ustilago maydis than the

55

corresponding 2R stereoisomers. In many cases, the fungicidal activity of

56

cis-propiconazole was more efficient than that of trans-propiconazole.12, 13 Although

57

the bioactivity of each propiconazole stereoisomer differs, few studies have examined

58

their fates individually under field conditions possibly due to the lack of effective

59

chiral analytical methods.

60

In our previous study, an analytical method for the stereoisomeric separation and

61

determination of propiconazole by normal phase HPLC with UV detection was

62

established.14 However, this method requires a long analysis time and a large amount

63

of organic solvent. Furthermore, because of an inability to remove certain endogenous

64

interferences and the lack of high selectivity for UV detection, it was challenging to

65

apply the methodology to some complex matrices, such as wheat. Mass spectrometric

66

detection, with its advantages of high selectivity, high sensitivity, and simple sample

67

pretreatment, has become the first choice in many laboratories.15 A study using

68

reversed-phase HPLC-MS/MS revealed that the four propiconazole stereoisomers

69

could be separated on a Lux Cellulose-2 column, but the retention time was too long

70

(greater than 50 min) to be suitable for routine analysis.16 Another study attempted to

71

separate propiconazole stereoisomers using HPLC-MS/MS on an AGP column, but

72

the resolutions among the eluted peaks of propiconazole under optimal conditions

73

were only 0.8, 0.6, and 1.2.17 In recent years, supercritical fluid chromatography -4ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 40

Page 5 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

74

(SFC), which possesses the advantages of speed, efficient separation and

75

environmental friendliness, has received increasing attention in chiral separation. 18

76

Toribio et al.19 successfully separated propiconazole stereoisomers using SFC with a

77

diode-array detector. Nevertheless, simultaneous determination of propiconazole

78

stereoisomers in wheat, grapes and soil by SFC has not been reported to date.

79

SFC-MS/MS is an effective alternative technique that overcomes many of the

80

shortcomings inherent to current methods.20 It combines the advantages of SFC with

81

HPLC-MS/MS technology. In addition, the use of post-column polar solvent

82

compensation technology has greatly improved the sensitivity of this technique.21

83

The objective of this work was to develop and validate an SFC-MS/MS method for

84

the determination of propiconazole stereoisomers in plants and soil and apply the

85

proposed method to study the stereoselective behavior of propiconazole in wheat

86

straw, grapes, and soil. The results will not only improve our understanding of chiral

87

pesticides but also provide data for the rational production and use of chiral

88

pesticides.

89

MATERIALS AND METHODS

90

Reagents and Materials. A propiconazole stereoisomer mix standard (purity:

91

96.5%), with the ratio of the four stereoisomers shown in Figure 2A close to 2:2:3:3,

92

was purchased from China Standard Material Center (Beijing, China). The

93

commercial 20% propiconazole micro-emulsion was obtained from the Langfang

94

pesticide pilot plant (Langfang, China). Four stereoisomers of propiconazole with

95

purity≥99.9% were prepared by Chiralway Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). -5ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

96

Chromatography-grade acetonitrile, methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, and formic acid

97

were purchased from Honeywell International (Morris Plains, NJ). Ultra-pure water

98

was obtained from a Milli-Q water purification system (Bedford, MA). Analytic grade

99

anhydrous magnesium sulfate, sodium chloride, and acetonitrile were from Sinopharm

100

Chemical Reagent Beijing Company (Beijing, China). Primary secondary amine

101

(PSA, 40 μm), octadecylsilane (C18, 40 μm), graphitized carbon black (GCB, 40 μm)

102

sorbents, and Cleanert Pesti-Carb/PSA (500 mg/500 mg/6 mL) SPE cartridges were

103

purchased from Agela Technologies, Inc. (Tianjin, China). Liquid CO2, Ar and N2

104

with purity over 99.999% were acquired from Qianxi Jingcheng Gas Sales Center

105

(Beijing, China).

106

A standard stock solution of the propiconazole stereoisomer mix (1000 mg/L) was

107

prepared in chromatography-grade acetonitrile. The pure solvent solutions required

108

for standard curves (10-1000 μg/L propiconazole mix) were prepared in acetonitrile

109

from the stock solution by serial dilution. All solutions were protected against light

110

with aluminum foil and stored at -20 °C prior to use.

111

Field Experiments. Working areas for wheat and grape were prepared in

112

experimental fields at Tianjin Agricultural University (Tianjin, China) in 2015. The

113

fields were divided into 30 m2-sized blocks, and a 1-m buffer zone was established to

114

separate each plot. Four trial plots were prepared for each treatment, of which three

115

plots were used as replicates, and the fourth one was used as the control. No plots had

116

been treated with the targeted fungicide in the preceding five years, and the use of any

117

other fungicide with a similar structure to that of propiconazole was forbidden during -6ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 40

Page 7 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

118

the trial period. The temperature of the area was maintained in the range of 26±10 °C

119

throughout the experiment. The propiconazole commercial product (20%

120

micro-emulsion) dissolved in water was sprayed one time on each plot. The

121

application rate was 180 g a.i./ha (grams of active ingredient per hectare, 1.5 times the

122

recommended dose, hereinafter the same) for the plots of wheat and wheat soil and 90

123

g a.i./ha for the grape plots. The foliar treatment was conducted on wheat and grape

124

plants at growth stages 2.7 and 7.5, respectively (according to the BBCH scale, i.e. the

125

Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt and Chemische Industrie scale).

126

Representative wheat straw (including straw and leaves) and grape samples for the

127

dissipation study were collected from each plot on day 0 (2 h), 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21,

128

28, and 35 after spraying; wheat grain samples were collected at harvest on day 50

129

after treatment. Soil samples were collected at depths of 0-15 cm at 15 randomly

130

selected points. The soil was sandy loam with 1.86% organic matter and pH 8.57

131

(suspension of soil in 0.01 M CaCl 2, 1:2.5 w/w). All samples were separately minced

132

(for wheat straw), mixed and stored at -20 °C.

133

Instrumentation and SFC-MS/MS Analytical Conditions. Stereoselective

134

analysis of propiconazole stereoisomers was performed using an Acquity ultra

135

performance convergence chromatography system (Waters, Milford, MA), which

136

included an auto back pressure regulator (ABPR), a sample manager, a binary solvent

137

manager, a column manager, a Waters 515 compensation pump and a PDA detector.

138

The optical rotation of the propiconazole stereoisomers was measured using an

139

OR-2090 Plus detector (JASCO Corporation, Japan). A Chiralpak AD-3 chiral -7ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

140

column (150 mm×4.6 mm i.d., 3 μm particle size, Daicel Chemical Industries, Japan)

141

was used for the resolution of analytes. The chiral stationary phase of the column was

142

amylose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenyl-carbamate) coated on 3-μm silica gel. The mobile

143

phase, consisting of CO2 and ethanol at a ratio of 93:7, was pumped at a flow rate of

144

2.0 mL/min during the analysis process. The ABPR pressure, column oven

145

temperature and sample room temperature were set at 2200 psi, 30 °C, and 25 °C,

146

respectively. In each run, 2 μL analyte samples were injected and 0.1% formic

147

acid/methanol (v/v), as a post-column compensation additive, was pumped at a flow

148

rate of 0.1 mL/min. Under the above conditions, the four propiconazole stereoisomers

149

were eluted within 4.7 min.

150

Quantitative analysis of the propiconazole stereoisomers was performed using a

151

triple quadrupole Xevo-TQD mass spectrometer (Waters Corp.) equipped with an

152

electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The nebulizer gas was 99.999% N 2, and the

153

collision gas was 99.999% Ar with a pressure of 2×10 -3 mbar in the T-wave cell. The

154

optimal monitoring conditions for target compounds were as follows: the capillary

155

voltage, source temperature and desolvation temperature were 3.0 kV, 150 °C and

156

500 °C, respectively, and a 50 L/h cone gas flow and 900 L/h desolvation gas flow

157

were applied. ESI+ and multiple reaction monitoring mode were adopted. The cone

158

voltage was 43 V, m/z 342 was selected as the precursor ion, and m/z 69 and m/z

159

158.9 were set as the product quantitative and qualitative ions, respectively, with the

160

corresponding collision energy settings at 22 and 28 V. The dwell time was 197 ms.

-8ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 40

Page 9 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

161

Masslynx NT v.4.1 SCN 882 (Waters Corp.) software was used to collect and analyze

162

the data.

163

Sample Preparation. Samples of wheat straw, wheat grain, and grapes were

164

thoroughly homogenized using a food processor. Soils were air-dried at room

165

temperature and passed through a 2-mm sieve.

166

An aliquot of homogenized sample of 5 g of wheat straw, 10 g of wheat grain, 10 g

167

of grape or 10 g of soil was weighed into a 50-mL PTFE centrifuge tube with screw

168

cap. For the recovery study, appropriate volumes of the propiconazole stereoisomer

169

mix standard solution were added. Blank samples were treated similarly to the other

170

samples, but no standard solution was added. Then, the tubes were vortexed for 3 min

171

and kept at room temperature for 2h. Next, 5 mL of ultra-pure water was added to

172

each matrix, except for grape, to which no water was added. Next, 10 mL of

173

acetonitrile was added. The tubes were capped and vortexed for 3 min, ensuring the

174

solvent interacted thoroughly with the sample, and then 4 g of anhydrous magnesium

175

sulfate and 1 g of sodium chloride were added to each tube. After the tubes were

176

capped, they were immediately vortexed intensively for 1 min and centrifuged for 5

177

min at a relative centrifugal force (RCF) of 2811×g. Then, a portion of supernatant

178

was transferred for further clean-up procedures.

179

For the wheat straw, wheat grain, and soil samples, 1.5 mL of the upper layer

180

(acetonitrile) was transferred into a 2-mL single-use centrifuge tube containing 150

181

mg of anhydrous magnesium sulfate and a fixed amount of sorbent (50 mg PSA+40

182

mg GCB for wheat straw and 50 mg PSA for wheat grain or soil). The tubes were -9ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

183

capped, vortexed again for 1 min and centrifuged for 5 min at 2811×g RCF. The

184

obtained supernatants were filtered through a 0.22-μm nylon syringe for SFC-MS/MS

185

injection.

186

For the grape sample, 2 mL of the supernatant acetonitrile was transferred to a

187

Cleanert Pesti-Carb/PSA SPE cartridge, which was preconditioned by 2×5 mL of

188

elution solvent (acetonitrile/toluene, 3:1, v/v). After that, the target compound was

189

eluted by 2×3 mL of elution solvent. All eluates were collected and evaporated to

190

dryness at 40 °C. The extract was reconstituted in 2 mL of acetonitrile and filtered

191

through a 0.22-μm syringe filter for SFC-MS/MS analysis.

192

Method Validation. Five blank samples of each matrix (wheat straw, wheat grain,

193

grape and soil) were analyzed to verify the absence of interfering species surrounding

194

the retention time of each stereoisomer. The linearity of the method was determined

195

by linear regression analysis of both the standard solution and matrix-matched

196

calibration curves. Parameters of the linear regression equations, including slope,

197

intercept and the correlation coefficient (R2), were calculated. The matrix-dependent

198

LOD and LOQ of the method were determined using the blank and calibration

199

standards of wheat straw, wheat grain, grape, and soil. The LOD for each

200

propiconazole stereoisomer is the concentration that produces a signal-to-noise (S/N)

201

ratio of 3, whereas the LOQ is defined based on S/N=10, estimated from the

202

chromatogram corresponding to the lowest concentration of the matrix-matched

203

calibration.

204

The matrix effect (ME, %) was calculated by - 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 40

Page 11 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Sin matrix - Sin solvent ×100% Sin solvent

205

ME =

206

where S denotes the slope of the calibration curves.

207

The accuracy and precision of the method were investigated by performing

Eqn. 1

208

recovery assays. Five replicates of samples spiked with the propiconazole

209

stereoisomer mix at three concentration levels (0.01, 0.05, and 0.5 mg/kg for wheat

210

grain, grape and soil and 0.02, 0.05, and 0.5 mg/kg for wheat straw) were prepared on

211

three different days by different operators. Analytes were extracted and purified

212

according to the procedure mentioned above. The precision for repeatability and

213

reproducibility was expressed as the intra-day and inter-day relative standard

214

deviation (RSD).

215

The stability of propiconazole in the solvent and matrices was tested monthly by

216

injection of a newly prepared working solution. All of the samples used in the stability

217

test were stored at -20 °C.

218

Data Analysis. The separation parameters of the propiconazole stereoisomers,

219

including retention factor (k'), selectivity factor (α) and resolution (Rs), were

220

calculated as follows

221 222

t  t0 t0 k2 α k1

k' 

Eqn. 2 Eqn. 3 t 2  t1 w1  w1

223

Rs  1.177

224

where t was the retention time, t0 was the void time under the above mentioned

225

conditions (determined using 1,3,5-tri-tert-butylbenzene), and w was the peak at half

226

height.

Eqn. 4

- 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

227

Page 12 of 40

The degradation of the propiconazole stereoisomers in plants and soil was assumed

228

to accord with first-order kinetics. The corresponding degradation rate constant, k, and

229

the half-life (T1/2, day) were calculated by

230

C  C0 e - kt

Eqn. 5

231

T1 / 2  ln 2 /k  0.693/k

Eqn. 6

232

where C0 denotes the initial concentration and C denotes the concentration at

233

sampling time t. Regression functions were obtained on the basis of the mean value of

234

three replicates.

235

The enantiomer fraction (EF) was used to measure the enantioselectivity of the

236

dissipation of the propiconazole enantiomers, and the diastereoisomer fraction (DF)

237

was calculated to fully describe the stereoselectivity of dissipation. The EF and the

238

DF of the propiconazole stereoisomers were defined by 22, 23

239

EFA 

( ) A (  ) A  ( ) A

Eqn. 7

240

EFA 

( ) B (  ) B  ( ) B

Eqn. 8

241

DF =

Da Da + Db

242

where (+)A, (−)A, (+)B, and (−)B denote the peak areas of the four specified

Eqn. 9

243

stereoisomers and Da and Db denote the peak areas of diastereoisomers A and B of

244

propiconazole, respectively.

245

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

246

Optimization of Chromatographic Conditions. Screening the chiral stationary

247

phase (CSP). Four polysaccharide-based CSPs, Chiralpak AD-3, Chiralpak IA-3,

248

Chiralpak IB-3, and Chiralpak IC-3, were employed to examine their ability to - 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

249

discriminate propiconazole stereoisomers. The screening assays were performed using

250

different organic solvents of acetonitrile, methanol, ethanol, and 2-propanol as

251

modifiers. Typical SFC-MS/MS chromatograms and the related separation conditions

252

are presented in Figure 2. The results showed that the best chromatographic separation

253

of the four propiconazole stereoisomers could be achieved on the Chiralpak AD-3

254

column, with resolutions above 2.0 and relatively short retention times (Figure 2A).

255

Additionally, baseline resolution could be obtained on the Chiralpak IA-3 column, but

256

the smallest resolution under the optimal separation conditions was just above 1.6

257

(Figure 2E). In the case of the other two cellulose-based chiral columns, i.e.,

258

Chiralpak IB-3 and Chiralpak IC-3, only partial separation was obtained (Figure 2B

259

and Figure 2C), indicating an insufficient propiconazole resolution. Thus, the

260

Chiralcel AD-3 column was chosen in this study.

261

Chiralpak AD-3 and Chiralpak IA-3 are two types of amylose-based columns;

262

although both are based on the tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) of amylose (Figure

263

2A, Figure 2E), their linkage types are different. The former is a coated type, while

264

the latter is an immobilized type. Generally, the chiral recognition ability of the

265

immobilized polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phase is lower than that of the

266

corresponding coated chiral stationary phase under the same standard conditions.24, 25

267

Chiralpak IB-3 and Chiralpak IC-3 were based on the

268

tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) of cellulose and the

269

tris-(3,5-dichlorophenylcarbamate) of cellulose, respectively. Of the three

270

polysaccharide CSPs, amylose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) has often exhibited - 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

271

excellent chiral resolution.26 This finding may be due to the difference of backbone

272

structures of the CSPs and their polar functional groups, by which different

273

preferences in their interaction with analytes occur.27, 28

274

Optimization of the mobile phase. In the SFC-MS/MS system, the main component

275

of the mobile phase was compressed liquid CO2. However, pure CO2 often could not

276

adequately elute the analytes, especially the polar analytes. Therefore, a certain

277

amount of an organic modifier was added to separate the propiconazole stereoisomers

278

on a Chiralcel AD-3 column. Comparative analysis assays concerning the type and the

279

proportion of organic modifier (acetonitrile, methanol, ethanol, and 2-propanol) were

280

conducted. The results showed that only ethanol or 2-propanol as the modifier could

281

achieve the baseline separation of the four propiconazole stereoisomers. However,

282

when 2-propanol was used, the retention time of each stereoisomer was delayed, and

283

the stereo-resolution was negatively affected by peak tailing (Figure 2D).

284

Furthermore, because of the lower content and higher viscosity of 2-propanol in the

285

mobile phase, the nebulization in the electrospray ionization source of the mass

286

spectrometer was often worse than when using ethanol. Comparatively, ethanol was

287

more conducive to the stereoisomeric separation of propiconazole on the Chiralcel

288

AD-3 column in terms of its excellent separation, short retention time, and good peak

289

shape. A pioneering study revealed that the four stereoisomers of propiconazole could

290

be separated on a Chiralcel AD column at 200 bar, 35 °C, and 2 mL/min. 19 However,

291

baseline separation of the four eluted peaks could not be achieved simultaneously

- 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 40

Page 15 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

292

with ethanol as the modifier. Although good separation could be obtained with

293

2-propanol as the modifier, the retention times were too long (above 15 min).

294

As shown by the results, the organic modifier content in the mobile phase has a

295

considerable effect on chiral separation. When the ethanol content increased from 5%

296

to 11% (v/v), k' for the four stereoisomers decreased from 3.53, 4.47, 5.03, and 5.73 to

297

1.22, 1.47, 1.73, and 1.93, respectively. Simultaneously, the Rs values decreased

298

significantly, from 5.08, 2.09, and 2.16 to 2.45, 2.33, and 1.45. By comparison, a final

299

amount of 7% ethanol (v/v) was selected for its relatively better resolution and shorter

300

retention times.

301

In addition, the flow rate of the mobile phase was also investigated for the

302

separation of propiconazole stereoisomers. Short retention times and low resolution

303

with the increasing flow rate were observed. When the flow rate increased from 1.6 to

304

2.4 mL/min, k' decreased significantly from 3.17, 3.84, 4.42, and 4.90 to 1.64, 2.04,

305

2.39, and 2.69, while α increased from 1.21, 1.15, and 1.11 to 1.24, 1.17, and 1.13.

306

Meanwhile, Rs decreased from 3.66, 2.84, and 2.08 to 3.27, 2.44, and 1.85. The flow

307

rate of 2.0 mL/min, which gave rise to better resolutions and relatively centered

308

retention times, was selected for subsequent experiments.

309

Selecting the ABPR pressure and column temperature. The pressure of the

310

supercritical system influences the density of CO2 and alters the eluotropic strength of

311

the fluid.29, 30 The effect of the ABPR pressure of the convergence manager was

312

investigated by changing it from 1,800 to 2,600 psi at intervals of 200 psi. The ABPR

313

pressure had a large effect on the retention time but a minimal effect on the resolution - 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

314

of the propiconazole stereoisomers. k' decreased from 2.63, 3.23, 3.74, and 4.18 to

315

2.00, 2.47, 2.87, and 3.20 with the increase in ABPR pressure, while α values were

316

constant. Considering that lower pressure is a benefit to the usage lifetime of the

317

Chiralpak AD-3 column, 2,200 psi, a relatively lower ABPR pressure with better

318

resolutions, was selected for further study.

319

Column temperature is a complicated factor affecting chiral separation when

320

supercritical fluid is used as the mobile phase. On the one hand, with the increase in

321

temperature, the density and solvating power of CO2 decreases, leading to an increase

322

in retention time. On the other hand, high temperature increases the solubility of the

323

analytes, causing a decrease in retention time.31 In the current study, the effect of

324

column temperature on resolution was investigated for the propiconazole

325

stereoisomers at 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 and 36 °C. A Chiralpak AD-3 column was

326

employed with a flow rate of 2.0 mL/min and 7% ethanol as the mobile phase

327

modifier with the ABPR pressure at 2200 psi. The results showed that the temperature

328

had a relatively slight impact on the separation of the propiconazole stereoisomers.

329

Overall, a higher temperature was favorable to higher resolution in this study. With

330

the increase in temperature, the selectivity did not change, but k' increased from 2.19,

331

2.69, 3.13, and 3.51 to 2.39, 2.93, 3.37, and 3.78. Clearly, the first of the two listed

332

effects might dominate possibly due to the low percentage (0.05, Student’s paired t-test) was observed.

418

Stereoselective Degradation. Dissipation in wheat straw and grapes. Under field

419

conditions, concentrations of the four propiconazole stereoisomers in wheat straw and

420

grapes almost achieved a maximum 2 h after foliar application (Figure 4A and B) and

421

then decreased with time. Thus, the concentration of each stereoisomer at 2 h was - 20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 40

Page 21 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

422

regarded as the starting point of the regressive degradation equation. The degradation

423

of the propiconazole stereoisomers in wheat straw and grapes followed first-order

424

kinetics, with R2 in the range of 0.8255-0.9879. The respective half-lives of

425

(+)-propiconazole B, (-)-propiconazole B, (-)-propiconazole A, and (+)-propiconazole

426

A were 3.37, 5.01, 7.43, and 10.45 days in wheat straw, and 3.12, 2.39, 8.71, and 7.03

427

days in grapes. The half-lives of (±)-propiconazole B and (±)-propiconazole A in both

428

wheat straw and grapes were all significantly different (P