Structure, Variation, and Co-occurrence of Soil Microbial Communities

Sep 27, 2016 - Canonical correspondence analysis indicated that species richness of plant community was the prime factor affecting microbial structure...
1 downloads 8 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV NEW ORLEANS

Article

Structure, Variation, and Co-occurrence of Soil Microbial Communities in Abandoned Sites of a Rare Earth Elements Mine Yuanqing Chao, Wenshen Liu, Yanmei Chen, Wenhui Chen, Lihua Zhao, Qiaobei Ding, Shizhong Wang, Ye-Tao TANG, Tong Zhang, and Rong-Liang Qiu Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 27 Sep 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 27, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 45

Environmental Science & Technology

47x43mm (600 x 600 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Variation,

and

Co-occurrence

of

Page 2 of 45

1

Structure,

Soil

Microbial

2

Communities in Abandoned Sites of a Rare Earth Elements Mine

3 4

Yuanqing Chao,1,2 Wenshen Liu,1 Yanmei Chen,1 Wenhui Chen,1 Lihua Zhao,1

5

Qiaobei Ding,1 Shizhong Wang,1,2 Ye-Tao Tang,1,2,* Tong Zhang,3 and Rong-Liang

6

Qiu1,2,*

7 8

1

9

Guangzhou, 510275, China.

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University,

10

2

11

Remediation Technology, Guangzhou, 510275, China.

12

3

13

University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and

Environmental Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, The

14 15

*

Corresponding authors

16

Address: School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen

17

University, Guangzhou, 510275, China.

18

Telephone: +86 020-84111215 (Y.T.) and +86 020-84113454 (R.Q.).

19

Fax: +86 020-84110508 (Y.T.) and +86 020-84110267 (R.Q.).

20

E-mail: [email protected] (Y.T.) and [email protected] (R.Q.).

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 45

Environmental Science & Technology

21

Abstract: Mining activity for rare earth elements (REEs) has caused serious

22

environmental pollution, particularly for soil ecosystems. However, the effects of

23

REEs on soil microbiota are still poorly understood. In this study, soils were collected

24

from abandoned sites of a REEs mine, and the structure, diversity, and co-occurrence

25

patterns of soil microbiota were evaluated by Illumina high-throughput sequencing

26

targeting 16S rRNA genes. Although microbiota developed significantly along with

27

the natural restoration, the microbial structure on the site abandoned for 10 years still

28

significantly differed from that on the unmined site. Potential plant growth promoting

29

bacteria (PGPB) were identified by comparing 16S sequences against a

30

self-constructed

31

siderophore-producing and phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria were more abundant in

32

the studied soils than in reference soils. Canonical correspondence analysis indicated

33

that species richness of plant community was the prime factor affecting microbial

34

structure, followed by limiting nutrients (total carbon and total nitrogen) and REEs

35

content. Further co-occurring network analysis revealed nonrandom assembly patterns

36

of microbiota in the studied soils. These results increase our understanding of

37

microbial variation and assembly pattern during natural restoration in REE

38

contaminated soils.

PGPB

database

via

BLAST,

and

it

was

found

that

39

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 45

40

Introduction

41

It is estimated that China holds about 50% of the world's rare earth elements (REEs)

42

resource and provides over 90% of the worldwide REEs supply.1 As a result of

43

massive and intensive mining activities, increased REEs contamination of soil, water,

44

and sediment has occurred in mining areas in China.1-3 Additionally, large-scale

45

application of REEs-containing fertilizers in agricultural activities4,5 and global usage

46

of technological devices such as rechargeable batteries, cell phones, and fluorescent

47

monitors6 has resulted in a substantial increase of anthropogenic REEs discharges to

48

various ecosystems, including farmlands,7 rivers,8 the marine environments,6 and

49

wastewater and solid waste treatment systems.9,10 Recently, anthropogenic REEs

50

pollution has attracted much attention because of the environmental persistence,

51

bioaccumulation, and toxicity of these elements.7

52 53

Microbes in soil are considered to be sensitive to environmental changes.11 Numerous

54

studies have demonstrated that heavy metals can cause adverse effects (e.g., decline

55

of microbial biomass and diversity, and inhibition of microbial activity) on soil

56

microbiota and their ecological functions.12-14 With short-term exposure to heavy

57

metals, tolerant species may be enriched while maintaining metabolic activity for the

58

selective effect of heavy metals.15 With long-term exposure, the processes including

59

heavy metal solubilization, transportation, and deposition may alter the structure of

60

soil microbiota and eventually affect their overall ecological functions.16 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 45

Environmental Science & Technology

61 62

Compared with studies on the more common heavy metals (e.g., copper, cadmium,

63

arsenic, lead, and zinc), only a few studies have investigated the effects of REEs on

64

microbiota. One study showed that REEs could significantly inhibit the activity of

65

ammonia and nitrite oxidizers, and thereby possibly decrease the efficiency of

66

nitrification in biological wastewater treatment.17 Another study on rumen microbial

67

fermentation found that REEs did not affect microbial denitrification and fermentation

68

efficiency.18 Additionally, several studies have shown that REEs are essential for

69

methanotrophic bacteria in extreme acidic environments and can significantly

70

enhance the catalytic efficiency of methanol dehydrogenase.19,20 These previous

71

studies have provided clues to the relationships between specific microbes and REEs

72

in various environments. Nevertheless, to our knowledge there has been little research

73

on the effects of REEs on the microbiome of soils, which suffer more serious REEs

74

pollution than any other ecosystem. Without such data, it is difficult to

75

comprehensively understand the effects of anthropogenic REEs on soil microbial

76

communities and their ecological functions.

77 78

In order to fill the research gap described above, we studied the microbial

79

communities in REE contaminated soils collected from abandoned sites of a REEs

80

mine in China. Illumina Miseq sequencing data targeting 16S rRNA genes were

81

generated and analyzed in-depth in order to (1) characterize the diversity and 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 45

82

taxonomic profile of microbial communities, (2) investigate the occurrence and

83

abundance of potential plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB), (3) determine the

84

influence of various environmental factors on microbial structure, and (4) explore

85

co-occurring patterns among microbial communities in REE contaminated soils.

86 87

Materials and Methods

88

Field Sites and Soils

89

Soils were collected from abandoned REEs mining sites in Jiangxi, China. This mine

90

applied heap leaching for REEs extraction, including 7 light REEs (La, Ce, Pr, Nd,

91

Pm, Sm, and Eu) and 10 heavy REEs (Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Sc, and Y).

92

Three sites with different times since abandonment, i.e., three (3Y), six (6Y), and ten

93

(10Y) years ago, were selected to evaluate the influence of natural recovery on the

94

microbial community (Figure S1 and Table S1). All sites were confirmed to have

95

received no amendment or remediation. An unexploited site at the REEs mine, at

96

which the soil contained relatively high REEs concentrations, was selected as a

97

control (HREE_CK). For each site, soils from three depths (0-5, 5-15, and 15-30 cm)

98

were collected in triplicate using a hollow-stem soil sampler. For comparison, another

99

control site (LREE_CK) in the region with lower REEs concentrations but with

100

similar climate and soil type (Table S1) was selected. Surface soil (0-5 cm) at this site

101

was collected in triplicate. All collected soils were divided into two parts. One part,

102

used for physicochemical analyses, was sealed in zip bags, stored at ambient 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 45

Environmental Science & Technology

103

temperature, and processed immediately after being transported to the laboratory. The

104

remaining soil, which was used for microbial analyses, was packed in sterilized

105

centrifuge tubes (50 mL), stored in a portable freezer (-18 ºC) at the site, and then

106

stored at -40 ºC in the laboratory until use.

107 108

Plant Communities and Soil Physicochemical Properties

109

Species richness (SR) and plant coverage (PC) of the plant communities were

110

measured by quadrat method. Soil physicochemical properties, including pH,

111

electrical conductivity (EC), water content (WC), gravel content (GC), total carbon

112

(TC), total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP),

113

lithophile elements (LE), siderophile elements (SE), light REEs (LR), and heavy

114

REEs (HR), were also measured. Detailed analytical methods are provided in the SI

115

(supplementary text T1).

116 117

DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and Illumina Miseq Sequencing

118

DNA of soils was extracted using the FastDNATM SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals,

119

France). PCR amplification and Illumina Miseq sequencing for 16S rRNA genes were

120

conducted according to standard protocols recommended by the Earth Microbiome

121

Project

122

(supplementary text T2).

(http://www.earthmicrobiome.org/).

For

details,

please

see

the

SI

123 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 8 of 45

124

Sequence Preprocessing

125

The obtained 16S rRNA sequences were preprocessed in Mothur (v 1.36.1).21

126

Paired-end sequences were overlapped to form contigs by command “make.contigs”.

127

The contigs were screened for high quality by command “trim.seqs” as follows: (1) an

128

exact match to barcodes and primers; (2) a quality cutoff of Q30; (3) zero ambiguous

129

base calls. Screened contigs, which were assigned to chloroplasts, mitochondria, or

130

Eukaryota

131

“remove.lineage”. The chimeras were detected in de novo mode22 and discarded by

132

commands “chimera.uchime” and “remove.seqs”, respectively. Finally, 1,349,224

133

high-quality sequences were obtained, with an average of 34,595 sequences per

134

sample (Table S2). Datasets of the 16S rRNA sequences were deposited in

135

MG-RAST under accession ID 4689540.3-4689578.3.

by

command

“classify.seqs”,

were

removed

by

command

136 137

Bioinformatic Analyses

138

High-quality sequences that passed preprocessing were taxonomically assigned by the

139

RDP classifier (v 2.10)23 with 50% confidence threshold based on a trade-off between

140

maintaining classification accuracy and maximizing the classifiable sequences.24 The

141

sequences were also clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) by UCLUST

142

at 97% identity using the script “pick_open_reference_otus.py” in QIIME (v 1.91),25

143

which used the Greengene database (13_8 release)26 as a reference. Based on the

144

reproducibility of technical duplicates (Figure S2 and supplementary text T3 in SI), 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 45

Environmental Science & Technology

145

low-abundance OTUs (0.6 and the Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value

178

was