Study of protein topography with flash ... - ACS Publications

Aug 16, 1976 - E. Van Wart, A. W. Burgess, L. I. Weinstein, and . A. Scheraga* abstract: A method for nonspecifically labeling essentially all exposed...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
VATHFSOh

I T

21

Study of Protein Topography with Flash Photolytically Generated Nonspecific Surface-Labeling Reagents: Surface Labeling of Ribonuclease At R. R. Matheson, Jr.,l H. E. Van Wart, A. W. Burgess, L. I. Weinstein, and H. A. Scheraga*

ABSTRACT: A method for nonspecifically labeling essentially all exposed residues of a protein is described. A reactive aryl nitrene is generated from N-(4-azido-2-nitrophenyl)-2-aminoethylsulfonate (NAP-Taurine), within 500 ks by flash photolysis in the presence of protein. The reactive nitrene is inserted in about 2 ms into those carbon-hydrogen bonds of the protein that are exposed to the solvent. The method is applied here to ribonuclease A to demonstrate the different degree of labeling of the native and denatured protein. On the basis of amino acid analysis, it appears that residues of the native protein that are buried in the interior of the molecule (as judged from the x-ray structure) do not react with the ni-

In

order to carry out studies of the pathway(s) of protein folding an experimental technique is needed that can monitor and discriminate among changes in many regions of the protein structure. Techniques which monitor the degree of surface exposure of various residues fall into this category. Nearly all of these techniques depend on the observation of the relative exposure of specific residues or types of residues. However, Staros and Richards (1974) have demonstrated the significant role that nonspecific labeling can play in monitoring surface features of cell membranes. They investigated the degree of exposure of protein components of human erythrocyte membranes in the cell surface, thus extending the applicability of aryl nitrenes from photoaffinity labels (Fleet et al., 1972; Knowles, 1972) to general covalent labels. Staros and Richards ( 1974) accomplished nonspecific labeling (over a period of 20 min) by slow photolytic generation of the aryl nitrene N-(4nitreno-2-nitrophenyI)-2-aminoethylsulfonate(11)

I1

which rapidly attacks exposed protein molecules, principally by means of insertion into carbon-hydrogen bonds. + From the Department of Chemistry, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853. Receiced August 16, 1976. This work was supported by research grants from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service ( G M - I43 12). and from the National Science Foundation (PCM75OX69 I ). 1 Yational Institutes of Health Predoctoral Trainee.

396

BIOCHEMISTRY. VOL.

16, NO. 3, 1917

trene. However, when these residues (even nonreactive ones such as valine and proline) are exposed by denaturation of the protein, they do react with the nitrene. It is shown that native ribonuclease A retains 90% of its enzymatic activity when flashed in the absence of NAP-Taurine. This small loss in activity arises from the disruption of a limited portion of the native enzyme structure, as judged by circular dichroism, Ultraviolet, and Raman spectra. The site of this limited disruption may be a portion of the enzyme surface near the Cys-26Cys-84 disulfide bond. The utility of this surface labeling technique for studying the pathways of protein folding or unfolding is discussed.

Nuclear magnetic resonance ( N M R ) ' spectroscopy (McDonald and Phillips, 1967; Meadows et al., 1968; Bradbury and King, 1972; Zaborsky and Milliman, 1972; Roberts and Benz, 1973), circular dichroism (CD) (Pflumm and Beychok, 1969; Simons et al., 1969) and optical rotatory dispersion (ORD) (Glazer and Simmons, 1965), ultraviolet (Shugar, 1952; Hermans and Scheraga, 1961; Brandts and Hunt, 1967), infrared (Hermans and Scheraga, 1960), and Raman spectroscopy (Lord and Yu, 1970; Chen and Lord, 1976), proteolytic digestion (Rupley and Scheraga, 1963; Klee, 1967), chemical modification of specific residues (Cha and Scheraga, 1963; Crestfield et al., 1963), and other techniques have been used to investigate the native structure and pathway(s) of folding of ribonuclease in solution. No one of the techniques is adequate for the description of the native structure. The results of many different experiments on the denaturation of a single protein can be considered together to obtain some insight on protein folding, but only with considerable experimental and deductive effort. The most detailed example of this type of analysis is the proposal by Burgess and Scheraga (1975) of a pathway for the thermal unfolding of bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A. To the extent that changes in the surface exposure of residues reflect conformational changes in the protein, the rapid, nonspecific labeling method introduced here provides additional useful information for such an analysis. It offers the advantages of the applicability to residues with relatively inert side chains (e.g., valine, proline, etc.) and the ability to probe nearly all of the surface of a protein instead of some limited area. In this paper, a method is introduced which uses the nonspecific labeling properties of I1 to monitor the surface exposure of nearly all the amino acid residues of a protein molecule.

'

Abbreviations used: NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; CD, circular dichroism; ORD, optical rotatory dispersion: NAP-Taurine, 1V-(4azido-2-nitrophenyl)-2-aminoethylsuIfonate; UV. ultraviolet; IR. infrared: TLC. thin-layer chromatography.

SURFACE LABELING OF PROTEINS

Flash photolytic generation of I1 in the presence of protein permits extremely rapid labeling of these exposed residues, which can be identified by subsequent amino acid analysis. Residues that are not labeled by the nitrene may be buried. This method is applied here to native and denatured bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A and holds promise for applicability to the study of protein unfolding. Experimental Section Materials. N-(4-Azido-2-nitrophenyl)-2-aminoethylsulfonate (NAP-Taurine) (I) was synthesized by the procedure of Staros (1974). The 90-MHz proton N M R spectrum (2.3% in deuterated Me2SO) contains peaks a t 6 7.75 (d, 1, phenyl position 3), 7.42 (9, 1, phenyl position 5 ) , 7.15 (d, 1, phenyl position 6). The rest of the spectrum is in close agreement with that of Staros and Richards (1974). Our product is identical with the major component of commercial NAP-Taurine (Pierce Chemical Co.) as indicated by chromatography on thin-layer silica gel plates (E. Merck) in chloroform-methanol (1:l) and isopropanol-formic acid-water (20:1:5). The NAP-Taurine was stored as moist (with water) crystals at 4 OC in the dark. Although aqueous solutions of NAP-Taurine appeared stable (as judged by thin-layer chromatography) for about 2 days in stoppered volumetric glassware a t room temperature and exposed to room light, care was taken to photolyze solutions containing this compound within 2 h of their dilution from freshly prepared, light-protected stock solutions. Bovine pancreatic ribonuclease (RNase) was purchased from Sigma (Type 11-A) and purified by column chromatography on carboxymethylcellulose (Whatman CM52) by the procedure of Taborsky (1959). Fractions corresponding to Taborsky's fraction D (RNase A) were pooled, dialyzed, lyophilized, and stored at 4 "C until needed. Enzymatic activity was determined with cyclic cytidine 2',3'-phosphate (P-L Biochemicals) (see the Ribonuclease Activity section). Denatured RNase A was obtained by heating dilute solutions of RNase A (pH 3,O.l M KCl) to 70 "C for 15-20 min. This was done in the thermally jacketed photolysis cell described in the Flash Photolysis Apparatus section. Distilled deionized water was used throughout. Ultraviolet- Visible, Circular Dichroism, and Raman Spectroscopy. All UV-vis spectra were obtained with a Cary Model 14 spectrophotometer. C D spectra were recorded with a C D 6001-equipped Cary Model 60 spectropolarimeter. The Raman spectra were obtained with an instrument described previously (Van Wart et al., 1976). The power a t the sample was about 300 mW. An instrumental resolution of 7 cm-I was used and, in a typical spectrum, data were collected for between 45 and 90 s at 2-cm-' intervals. Flash Photolysis Apparatus. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the sample cell and flash lamp circuit. The radiation source is an I.L.C. 7L6 Xenon flash tube, which was fired a t 2 kV and discharged in about 500 ps. The sample compartment is a cylindrical annulus of 1-mm path length, 15.2-cm long. A thermally jacketed cell (not shown in Figure 1 ) of comparable dimensions was used for work at temperatures other than room temperature. In a typical experiment, dry nitrogen gas (N2) was blown through the compartment and bubbled through the sample for 15 min. After allowing 10 min for temperature equilibration, the sample was flashed, the volume of gas evolved was determined and the sample was recovered. The production of nitrene was followed quantitatively by measurement of the volume of Nz evolved, using a Warburg manometer (Dixon, 1951), since 1 mol of N2 and 1 mol of re-

p.

w D C POWER SUPPLY

(0-23 kV)

c

l

5

2

~~

c

m

~

A

~

~~

C OUTER OUARTZ T U B E INNER QUARTZ

ILC

TUBE

XENON F L A S H T U B E

(7L61

FIGURE 1: Diagram of the flash photolysis apparatus. ( A ) Schematic of the electronics; (B) dimensions of the sample cell; (C) end view of the sample cell and flash tube.

active aryl nitrene are the anticipated initial products of photolyzed NAP-Taurine. A uranyl oxalate actinometer was used to estimate2 the dosage of light (moles of photons per unit volume of sample) provided in one flash. Amino Acid Analysis of Labeled Protein. Nitrenes generated in the presence of protein are capable of insertion into carbon-hydrogen bonds to form secondary amines which are stable to acid hydrolysis (Reiser et al., 1966; Smith, 1970). Those amino acid residues which are so attacked will then possess a covalently bound label and an additional negative charge (R-S03-, pK = 2 . 5 ) . Hydrolyzates (6 N HCI, 105 OC for 24 h in vacuo) of the labeled protein will then show an apparent loss of certain residues when chromatographed on a T S M automatic amino acid analyzer. Following recovery of flashed ribonuclease samples (with or without label), D,Lnorleucine was added as an internal standard. The standard deviation for the determination of a single type of residue was about 2% for native, unflashed RNase A and about 6% for the labeled RNase A samples. Correction factors for hydrolysis losses were those of Rupley and Scheraga The xenon emission spectrum is continuous for wavelengths greater than about 225 nm and extends into the near IR. The spectrum is only weakly dependent on operating parameters of the lamp (Carlson and Clark, 1965); hence, a typical xenon spectrum was employed to estimate the fraction of light intensity emitted in any particular spectral region. Taylor (1971) has tabulated the quantum efficiencies for the uranyl oxalate actinometer at a number of discrete wavelengths in the range 208-438 nm. By assuming that these quantum efficiencies were valid in a small wavelength region around that a t which they were measured and that radiation of a wavelength greater than 500 nm induced a negligible amount of oxalate oxidation, it was possible to roughly estimate the dosage of radiation in a particular wavelength range. BIOCHEMISTRY, VOL. 16, NO. 3,

1977

397

( 1963).3 The value of 12.0 mol/mol of protein was assigned to the average of the areas of the glutamic acid and alanine peaks in hydrolyzates of unflashed RNase A samples (Rupley and Scheraga, 1963). Ribonuclease Acticity. The enzymatic activity of RNase A toward cyclic cytidine 2’,3’-phosphate was determined by the procedure of Crook et al. (1960) when no label was present, and by the method of Josefsson and Lagerstedt (1963) when activity in the presence of NAP-Taurine was of interest. For this latter procedure, use was made of T L C silica gel plates prepared without fluorescence indicator (E. Merck). Immunological Procedure. Pancreatic ribonuclease A (Sigma Type 11-A) was used without further purification for the immunization of New Zealand White rabbits. Antiribonuclease antiserum was produced as described by Brown (1962). Ouchterlony (1 948) double immunodiffusion was performed on glass microscope slides overlaid with 2 ml of 0.7% Ionagar (Colab, Chicago Heights, ill.) in 0.05 M barbital buffer (pH 8.6). Patterns were cut with a no. 2 cork borer and were allowed to develop for 24 h at room temperature. Plates were soaked overnight in 0.15 M NaCl and then stained with a 1% solution of Buffalo Black in 0.1 M acetic acid prior to photographing. Miscellaneous Methods. RNase A concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically, using A,, 278 nm and 9700 (Sage and Singer, 1962). NAP-Taurine concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically using A,,,,,, 47 1 and E , , , ~4730 , (Staros and Richards, 1974). pH measurements were made with a Radiometer Type P H M 4c instrument equipped with a Radiometer GK2302B combined electrode. Irradiation of NAP-Taurine solutions was also performed for long times (of the order of minutes) with a G.E. AH6 mercury arc lamp (using interference filters to isolate light of wavelengths between 200 and 400 nm), with a G.E. Quartzline BRH lamp, and with the 488-nm line of a Coherent Radiation Model 52 argon ion laser (using a beam expander).

Results and Discussion Requirements That the Surface Labeling Technique Must Meet. In order to be applicable to the study of protein folding, any nonspecific surface labeling technique must meet the requirements specified below: (1) The labeling process itself should not alter the surface topography of the protein. This requirement would be satisfied if the reaction took place on a time scale that is fast compared with that required for the protein to unfold sufficiently to allow labeling of residues which are buried in the interior. (2) The presence of compound I (eq 1) in solution before labeling should not alter the surface features of the protein. (3) It should be demonstrated that residues known to be buried in the native protein are not labeled but can be labeled in the denatured protein. (4) In order to correctly interpret the labeling patterns (Le., the number of each type of residue that is labeled), it should I n this initial paper. no effort was made to determine quantitatively how much Cys was converted to cystine, cysteic acid, etc., by means of the

flash. Thus. our reported values for half-cystine are probablq too low. This problem Has not investigated here because thc products of photolyzed cystine residues in RNase ate still somewhat uncertain, especially for a polqchromatic light source such as ours (Augenstein and Riley. 1964; Rathinasamy and Augenstein, 1968; Shafferman and Stein, 1974). Investigation of the products of tyrosine-mediated cystine photolysis. under the conditions used here. is now in progress.

398

BIOCHEMISTRY,

VOL.

16, NO. 3, 1977

be determined to what extent the labeling reagent is nonspecific. In the following sections, the above requirements are discussed with reference to the labeling of bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A with NAP-taurine, using flash photolysis to activate the label. Photolysis of NAP- Taurine. One of the attractive features of aryl azide labels is that they can be photolyzed with light of long enough wavelengths so that radiation damage to their targets can be minimized (Smith et al., 1962; Knowles, 1972; Fleet et a]., 1972; Staros and Richards, 1974). However, in the cases where this feature has been used to advantage, the irradiation times (with light of wavelengths greater than about 400 nm) have been on the order of minutes (Staros and Richards, 1974) or even hours (Fleet et al., 1972). For the case of proteins in aqueous solution, it seems very unlikely that a useful number of covalent labels (especially when they bear ionic charges to increase their solubility in water) could be attached over a period of many minutes without inducing some change in the protein surface, even without any radiation effects. Thus, we sought to determine by how much the irradiation time for NAP-Taurine could be decreased. We attempted to induce photolysis (as measured by nitrogen evolution), using the broad visible absorption band centered near 470 nm, by irradiation with the 488-nm line of an argon laser. Irradiation for times as long as 10 min a t a power of approximately 1 W resulted in thermal heating but an insignificant amount of photolysis. Hence, the visible absorption band is not useful for accomplishing rapid photolysis. The stronger absorption with A,, 270 ( t 2.2 X I O 4 M-’ cm-” lies in the range (250-310 nm) cited by Smith (1970) as that for the longest wavelengths of effective azide photolysis. That absorption under this band results in efficient photolysis was confirmed by irradiation of NAP-Taurine samples for short times (200/1) represent the maximum number of unlabeled residues in ribonuclease. According to the data of Richards and Wyckoff (1971), there are 3 Val, 1 Tyr, 1 Phe, 1 Met, 1 Ser, and 4 half-cystine residues that are completely “buried” (both side chain and a-carbon) by the criteria of Lee and Richards (1971). If requirement 3 is to be met, ar least these numbers and types of residues must be observed in all hydrolyzates. At high label/ protein ratios, 2.1 0.9 Tyr, 0.6 Phe, 1.1 Met, and 2.0 half-cystine are unlabeled. Column 2 of Table I shows that 2.1 half-cystine residues are modified by the flash itself, and subsequent information about them has been lost; thus, if the cystine modified by the flash was initially buried, only 2 halfcystine residues would be found near surface saturation. The physical measurements discussed in preceding sections (Effect Hydrolysis for longer times (72 h) than those routinely used resulted in an increase of the amount of valine (by 0.8 residue) and isoleucine (by 0.7 residue) recovered (accompanied by decreases in the amounts of the other amino acids recovered, due to increased hydrolysis losses) from hydrolyzates of both native RNase A and from protein labeled with a label/protein ratio (chosen as 212:l in this experiment). Peptide bonds involving valine are often difficult to hydrolyze because of steric hindrance which is particularly severe in the case of the Ile-107-Val-108 bond. In fact, Val-I08 is one of the three “buried” valines and Ile- I07 is substantially shielded from solvent in the x-ray structure (Richards and Wyckoff, 1971). Thus, the increases in the amounts of these two types of residues with more severe hydrolysis conditions satisfactorily explain the apparently low valine recovery figures in Table I . There are 2.9 unlabeled valine residues as surface saturation is approached.

of Flashing on Native Ribonuclease in the Absence of Label and Effect of Unflashed Label in Solution with RNase A) show that little denaturation takes place before labeling, so that it is reasonable to make the assumption that the disrupted cystine is an initially buried one. Thus, the first part of requirement 3 is fulfilled. It remains to be shown that the residues presumed to be protected from the label in the native structure can be labeled in the denatured enzyme. Column 12 of Table I presents the results obtained from hydrolysis and amino acid analysis of RNase labeled at 70 O C , pH 3.0. Except for the case of Ser, all of the types of buried residues (Val, Tyr, Phe, Met, and half-cystine) were present in smaller amounts after flashing at 70 OC. Hence, the second part of requirement 3 is fulfilled. Turning to requirement 4,columns 9, 10, and 11 of Table I show that surface saturation has not been attained. In addition to those 11 residues needed to satisfy requirement 3, there are 5 Asp (or Asn), 3 Thr, 5 Ser, 6 Glu (or Gln), 1 Pro, 2-3 Gly, 4 Ala, 4 Lys, and fractional amounts of Ile, Leu, Arg, and His remaining in the hydrolyzates. In order to satisfy requirement 4 and obtain the information necessary to explain these results, we attempted to determine the selectivity of the aryl nitrene quantitatively. Such compounds are known to be somewhat selective in their insertion into C-H bonds (Knowles, 1972). Flashing of solutions containing excess NAP-Taurine together with mixtures of the amino acids found as residues in RNase A resulted in some fraction of all residues being attacked. Basic amino acids were labeled to a somewhat greater extent than acidic amino acids; for the nonpolar amino acids, the degree of labeling increased with the size of the side chain. However, these results cannot be generalized to the case of protein labeling. For example, although all 3 glycine residues in native RNase A are exposed to the solvent, and it is possible to label about 50% of the glycine molecules in an equimolar mixture of free amino acids, only a fractional amount of the Gly residues in RNase A are labeled. The selectivity of the nitrene toward residues of a given type may be significantly BIOCHEMISTRY, VOL. 1 6 , NO.

3, 1977

401

MATHESON

influenced by the protein environment around these residues. For example, electrostatic interactions with nearby charged residues may contribute to orienting the nitrene and enhancing or decreasing the degree of labeling of a given residue out of proportion to either its exposure, or its intrinsic reactivity toward the nitrene. In order to satisfy requirement 4 minimally, however, less than full information about the label specificity is required. Column 12 of Table I shows the analyses obtained from hydrolyzates of RNase A labeled a t 70 OC, p H 3.0, conditions where it is substantially unfolded. These data demonstrate that all types of residues in RNase A can be labeled. Apparently Gly, Ser, Asp (probably as aspartic acid rather than asparagine residues), and Glu (probably glutamic acid rather than amide) are labeled only very inefficiently. Nevertheless, while we cannot quantitatively determine the selectivity of NAP-Taurine toward the various amino acids, we can state that, since no amino acid has zero reactivity, any changes in labeling patterns (e.g., changes induced by progressively unfolding the protein) can be interpreted as reflecting some modification of the protein structure around the labeled residues. The exact nature of such a modification may not be easy to elucidate until requirement 4 is satisfied more fully. Conclusions Nonspecific, surface labeling of proteins (when initiated by flash photolysis of an aryl azide precursor) has been shown to be a convenient means of covalently labeling those residues that are exposed to the solvent. The prospect of extending the nonspecific surface labeling technique to studies of unfolded structures in proteins now seems possible. Insofar as alterations in the surface reflect the stages of protein unfolding, the technique can contribute information that will complement the information available by other methods. The acquisition of more extensive information by introducing proteolytic digestion (to locate precisely which residues are on the surface and hence labeled), temperature variation (to obtain “intermediate states of folding”), and other modifications are clear possibilities. For the particular case of RNase A labeled with NAPTaurine, the labeling reaction proceeds without difficulty and yields evidence that suggests that Cys-26-Cys-84 is the disulfide most easily disrupted by U V light. Acknowledgments The authors thank E. R. Stimson for help with the N M R spectrum of NAP-Taurine, R. K. Scheule and F. R. Maxfield for obtaining the laser Raman spectra and plotting the data, L. Chavez for supplying the antiribonuclease antiserum, and T. C. Hageman, G. G . Hammes, and F. Cardinaux for helpful discussions. W e also thank G. Davenport and T. Thannhauser for their excellent technical assistance and Dr. Lord for furnishing us a copy of his manuscript [Chen, M. C., and Lord, R. C. (1976), Biochemistry 15, 18891 in advance of publication. References Aktipis, S.,and Iammartino, A. J. (1971), Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 44, 9 18. Arian, S., Benjamini, M., Feitelson, J., and Stein, G. (1 970), Photochem. Photobiol. 12, 48 1. Augenstein, L., and Riley, P. (1964), Photochem. Photobioi. 3, 353. Bradbury, J. H., and King, N . L. R. (1972), Aust. J . Chem. 25, 209.

402

BIOCHEMISTRY, VOL.

16, NO. 3, 1977

t T

A L

Brandts, J. F., and Hunt, L . (1967), J . Am. Chem. SOC.89, 4826. Brandts, J. F., and Kaplan, L. J. (1973), Biochemistry 12, 201 I . Brown, R. K. (l962), J . Bioi. Chem. 237, 1 162. Burgess, A. W., and Scheraga, H . A. ( 1 975), J . Theor. Bioi. 53, 403. Carlson, F. E., and Clark, C. N . (1965), in Applied Optics and Optical Engineering, Kingslake, R., Ed., New York, N.Y., Academic Press, pp 44-90. Cha, C. Y., and Scheraga, H. A. (l963), J . Biol. Chem. 238, 2958. Chen, M. C., and Lord, R. C. (l976), Biochemistry 15, 1889. Crestfield, A. M., Stein. W. H., and Moore, S. (1963), J . Biol. Chem. 238, 241 3. Crook, E. M., Mathias, A. P., and Rabin, B. R. (1960), Biochem. J . 7 4 , 234. Dixon, M. (1951), Manomeric Methods, 3rd ed, London, Cambridge University Press, pp 9-15. Fleet, G . W. J., Knowles, J. R., and Porter, R. R. (1972), Biochem. J . 128, 499. Frushour, B. G., and Koenig, J . L. ( 1 9 7 9 , in Advances in Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy, Vol. I , Clark, R. J. H., and Hester, R. E., Ed., London, Heyden and Son, Ltd., pp 58-63. Garel, J., Nall, B. T., and Baldwin, R. L. ( 1 976), Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. U.S.A.60, 1853. Glazer, A. N., and Simmons, N . S. (1969, J . Am. Chem. Soc. 87, 3991. Grist, K. L., Taylor, T., and Augenstein, L. ( 1 9 6 3 , Radiat. Res. 26, 198. Hermans, J., Jr., and Scheraga, H. A. (1960), J . Am. Chem. SOC. 82, 5156. Hermans, J., Jr., and Scheraga, H. A. (1961), J . Am. Chem. Soc. 83, 3293. Horwitz, J., Strickland, E. H., and Billups, C. (1 970), J . Am. Chem. Soc. 92, 21 19. Josefsson, L., and Lagerstedt, S. (1963), Biochim. Biophys. Acta 76, 47 1. Klee, W . A. ( 1 967), Biochemistry 6, 3736. Knowles, J. R. (1972), Acc. Chem. Res. 5, 155. Laustrait, G., and Hasselmann, C. ( 1 9 7 9 , Photochem. Photobiol. 22, 295. Lee, B., and Richards, F. M . (I97 I ) , J . Mol. Biol. 55, 379. Lord, R. C. , and Yu, N.T. ( 1 970), J . Mol. Biol. 51, 203. McDonald, C. C.. and Phillips, W. D. (1967), J . Am. Chem. Soc. 89, 6332. Meadows, D. H., Jardetzky, O., Epand, R. M., Ruterjans, H. H., and Scheraga, H . A. (1968), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 60, 766. Ouchterlony, 0. (1948), Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 25, 186. Pflumm, M . N., and Beychok, S. (1969), J . Biol.Chem. 244, 3973. Rathinasamy, T. K., and Augenstein, L. G. (1 968), Biophys. J . 8, 1275. Reiser, A., Bowes, G., and Horne, R. J. (1966), Trans. Faraday Soc. 62, 3 162. Reiser, A., Willets, F. W., Terry, G . C., Williams, V., and Marley, R. (1968), Trans. Faraday SOC.64, 3265. Richards, F. M., and Wyckoff, H. W. (1971), Enzymes, 3rd Ed. 4, 641-806. Risi, S., Dose, K . , Rathinasamy, T. K., and Augenstein, L. ( 1 967), Photochem. Photobiol. 6, 423.

M A G N E S I U M - D E P E N D E N T E N D O N U C L E A S E 0 F 5. S U B T l L l S

Roberts, G. C. K., and Benz, F. W. (1973), Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 222, 130. Rupley, J. A,, and Scheraga, H. A. (1963), Biochemistry 2, 421. Sage, H. J., and Singer, S. J. (1962), Biochemistry 1, 305. Shafferman, A., and Stein, G. (1974), Photochem. Photobiol. 20, 399. Schultz, R. M., Iammartino, A. J., and Aktipis, S. (1975), Biochim. Biophys. Acta 386, 120. Shugar, D. (l952), Biochem. J . 52, 142. Siamwiza, M . N., Lord, R. C., Chen, M. C., Takamatsu, T., Harada, I., Matsuura, H., and Shimanouchi, T. (1975), Biochemistry 14, 4870. Simons, E . R., Schneider, E. G., and Blout, E. R. (1969), J . Biol. Chem. 244, 4023. Smith, P. A. S. (1970), in Nitrenes, Lwowski, W., Ed., New York, N.Y., Wiley, p 99ff. Smith, P. A. S., Hall, J . H., and Kan, R. 0. (1962), J . Am. Chem. SOC.84, 485. Staros, J . V. (l974), Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University. Staros, J . V., and Richards, F. M. (1974), Biochemistry 13,

2720. Taborsky, G. (1959), J. Biol. Chem. 234, 2652. Taylor, H. A. (1971), in Analytical Photochemistry and Photochemical Analysis, Fitzgerald, J. M., Ed., New York, N.Y., Marcel Dekker, pp 104-113. Tsong, T . Y . , and Baldwin, R. L. (1972), J . Mol. Biol. 69, 149. Tsong, T. Y., Baldwin, R. L., McPhie, P., and Elson, E. L. (1972), J . Mol. Biol. 63, 453. Van Wart, H. E., Cardinaux, F., and Scheraga, H. A. (1976), J. Phys. Chem. 80, 625. Van Wart, H . E., and Scheraga, H. A. (l977), Methods Enzymol. (in press). Volkert, W. A., and Grossweiner, L. I. (1973), Photochem. Photobiol. 17, 8 1. Woody, R. W., Friedman, M. E., and Scheraga, H. A. (l966), Biochemistry 5 , 2034. Yu, N. T., Jo, B. H., and Liu, C. S. (1 972), J. Am. Chem. SOC. 94, 7572. Zaborsky, 0.R., and Milliman, G. E. (1972), Biochim. Biophys. Acta 271, 274.

Isolation, Characterization, and Activation of the MagnesiumDependent Endodeoxyribonuclease from Bacillus subtilis + William F. Burke, Jr.,* and John Spizizen

ABSTRACT: A major endodeoxyribonuclease was isolated from a mutant of the transformable Bacillus subtilis 168. The magnesium-dependent endonuclease was purified approximately 750-fold to electrophoretic homogeneity. The enzyme had a molecular weight of about 3 1 000, as determined by gel filtration and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The protein appears to be composed of two subunits. The nuclease was dependent on magnesium or manganese ions for hydrolytic activity. The purified nuclease degraded DNA from several species of Bacillus, as well as Escherichia coli DNA, alkylated, depurinated, and thymine-dimer containing B. subtilis DNA,

and hydroxymethyluracil-containingphage DNA. The enzyme also hydrolyzed single-stranded DNA, although native DNA was the preferred substrate. However, the nuclease was unable to degrade ribosomal RNA. The cleavage products of the DNA hydrolysis have 5’-phosphate and 3’-hydroxyl ends. The enzyme could be activated in crude extracts by heat treatment or treatment with guanidine hydrochloride. The nuclease activity was inhibited by phosphate and by high concentrations of NaCI. A possible function for this endonuclease in bacterial transformation is discussed.

B a c t e r i a l transformation is a process of intercellular transfer of genetic information in which D N A molecules bind to competent recipient cells, penetrate the surface layers of those cells, and recombine with the recipient genome. In the process of uptake and penetration, high-molecular-weight duplextransforming DNA attaches to the surface of competent Bacillus subtilis cells in an endwise manner and enters in a linear progressive fashion (Davidoff-Abelson and Dubnau, 197 3). Competent cells then convert transforming DNA of higher molecular weight to double-stranded fragments which possess lecular weights of about 9 X IO6. These fragments are rated by endonucleolytic cleavage in the periplasmic space.

These double-stranded fragments are then converted to single-stranded fragments, probably during transfer across the membrane. The fragmentation of DNA in the initial phases of transformation thus suggests the involvement of at least several nucleases. A number of deoxyribonucleases have been demonstrated in B. subtilis (Chestukhin and Shemyakin, 1972; Ciarrocchi et al., 1976; Hayase et al., 1975; Kageyama, 1970; Kanamori et al., 1974a, 1974b). Two endonucleases have been suggested as candidates for the double-stranded fragment generating enzyme. One is the manganese-stimulated endonuclease described by Scher and Dubnau (1 973, 1976), and the other is the magnesium-dependent heat-activated nuclease first demonstrated by McCarthy and Nester (1969). In an effort to characterize the magnesium-dependent endonuclease, a purification technique was developed for the

m the Department of Microbiology, Scripps Clinic and Research .dation, La Jolla, California, 92037. Received August 24, f 976. This xork was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI-12452, GM-20145. and GM-02293.

BIOCHEMISTRY, VOL.

16, N O . 3 , 1977

403