Super-Resolution Structured Illumination Microscopy - Chemical

Nov 10, 2017 - In 2005 he became an associate professor in the Department of Internal Medicine at the University of California, Davis, and was Chief S...
2 downloads 12 Views 20MB Size
Review pubs.acs.org/CR

Super-Resolution Structured Illumination Microscopy Rainer Heintzmann*,†,‡ and Thomas Huser*,§,∥ †

Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, Albert-Einstein Straße 9, 07745 Jena, Germany Institute of Physical Chemistry and Abbe Center of Photonics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07745 Jena, Germany § Biomolecular Photonics, Department of Physics, University of Bielefeld, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany ∥ Department of Internal Medicine and NSF Center for Biophotonics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, United States ‡

ABSTRACT: Super-resolved structured illumination microscopy (SR-SIM) is among the most rapidly growing fluorescence microscopy techniques that can surpass the optical diffraction limit. The strength of SR-SIM is that it can be readily applied to samples prepared for conventional fluorescence microscopy, requiring no sophisticated sample preparation protocols. As an extension of wide-field fluorescence microscopy, it is inherently capable of multicolor imaging and optical sectioning and, with sufficiently fast implementations, permits live cell imaging. Image reconstruction, however, currently relies on sophisticated computational procedures, susceptible to reconstruction artifacts, requiring trained users to recognize and avoid them. Here, we review the latest developments in SR-SIM research. Starting from a historical overview of the development of SR-SIM, we review how this method can be implemented in various experimental schemes, we provide an overview of the important parameters involved in successful image reconstruction, we summarize recent biological applications, and we provide a brief outlook of the directions in which we believe SR-SIM is headed in the future.

CONTENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Introduction The Origins of SR-SIM The Nitty-Gritty Details of Realizing SR-SIM Labeling Strategies for SR-SIM Reconstruction Algorithms for SR-SIM 5.1. The Nitty-Gritty Details of SIM Image Reconstruction 5.2. The Complications of 3D-SIM 5.3. BlindSIM Image Reconstruction 5.4. Avoiding SR-SIM Image Reconstruction Artifacts 6. Alternative Approaches to SR-SIM 7. Combining SR-SIM with Other Super-Resolution Modalities 8. Increasing the Resolution beyond a Factor of 2: Nonlinear SR-SIM 9. Applications of SR-SIM to Cell Biology 10. Conclusions and Perspective Associated Content Special Issue Paper Author Information Corresponding Authors ORCID Notes Biographies Acknowledgments References © 2017 American Chemical Society

1. INTRODUCTION Super-resolved structured illumination microscopy (SR-SIM) is one of the most universally implemented optical superresolution techniques, applicable to a wide variety of biological problems. The main charm of SR-SIM lies in the fact that it can readily be applied to samples that are prepared for standard fluorescence microscopy without requiring significant additional sample preparation effort. In addition, SR-SIM is multicolor capable: typically demonstrated and implemented in up to four different color channels. It places no special requirements on the fluorophores used for sample labeling other than that they have to be reasonably resistant to photobleaching. Since structured illumination microscopy was first demonstrated around the same time as stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, it can be counted among the original super-resolution microscopy techniques, having been implemented through a wide range of schemes.1,2 Because of this, a number of terms that describe its different implementations, such as two-dimensional SIM (2D-SIM), three-dimensional SIM (3D-SIM), total internal reflection fluorescence SIM (TIRF-SIM), coherent SIM, standing wave illumination, etc., can be found in the literature. While we will briefly describe the differences between these different implementations in this review, we will primarily use the term SR-SIM to refer to the basic technique utilizing a periodic

13890 13891 13892 13893 13895 13896 13898 13898 13900 13900 13901 13901 13902 13904 13904 13904 13904 13904 13904 13904 13904 13905 13905

Received: April 26, 2017 Published: November 10, 2017 13890

DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00218 Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 13890−13908

Chemical Reviews

Review

convolution with an intensity point spread function can be used as a simple description of imaging. This incoherent sample response (i.e., fluorescence) is the fundamental reason for SRSIM’s ability to achieve a spatial resolution corresponding to the sum of the maximum spatial frequencies (in excitation and emission) that can be transmitted through the optical system. In the field of fluorescence, the excitation of fluorophores by a structured illumination pattern was used early on to achieve confocal-like optical sectioning.4 However, the relatively coarse illumination pattern and the algorithms used for this purpose (not requiring knowledge of the illumination phase) were unsuitable to achieve a substantial lateral resolution improvement compared to wide-field imaging with uniform illumination. The concept of standing wave microscopy promoted by Lanni and co-workers described a setup aimed at substantially increasing the axial resolution with the help of an axial sinusoidal illumination pattern generated by interfering opposing beams from the same laser.9 This approach, unfortunately, had a transfer function that left a substantial gap in the axial spatial frequencies and was therefore unsuitable for high-resolution imaging. This shortcoming was fixed by the I5M approach introduced by Gustafsson et al., which generates a short-range axial interference pattern using spatially and temporally incoherent illumination resulting in an axial resolution of approximately 100 nm.10 Even though this setup can be considered to be an axial form of structured illumination, it is in a way simpler than current SR-SIM: One acquired image stack in a well-adjusted system can be described as the sample having been convolved with one threedimensional optical intensity transfer function. The illumination pattern is generated by the same objective lenses used for imaging. Moving the object between the two opposing objective lenses leads to the axial modulation looking like part of the point spread function, which simplifies the reconstruction substantially. In the case of lateral modulation of the illumination, the resulting images look as if the lateral illumination structure had been imprinted onto the sample in every image. In order to reconstruct a high resolution image, several images at different illumination phases have to be acquired to illuminate all parts of the sample, and to then unmix the overlapping Fourier components that encode the high resolution information. Such concepts of phase stepping are generally also well-known from coherent holography and have even been conceptualized for use in fluorescence by Lanni et al.9 In a patent by Ben-Levy it is conceptually described how such an unmixing approach can be used together with a lateral sinusoidal illumination to achieve a lateral resolution improvement.11 The independently developed laterally modulated excitation microscopy, presented orally in 1998 at the SPIE Europe conference and published shortly thereafter,1 was to our knowledge the first experimental demonstration of such a concept demonstrating SR-SIM for the fluorescence case. The unmixing mathematics of this publication still lacked the matrix notation and the weighted averaging step had not yet been introduced. Gustafsson improved upon this approach in a seminal publication in 20002 where the reconstruction mathematics contained the matrix description (see also ref 12) and the weighted averaging approach that makes SR-SIM particularly powerful. His publication was also the first to experimentally verify the factor of 2 in bandwidth extension (i.e., resolution increase). So et al.13 then published a SR-SIM-like method using total internal reflection (TIR) for illumination, which

interference pattern with a periodicity near the optical diffraction limit, in order to distinguish it from an even older method, also called SIM, that uses comparably coarse structured illumination patterns to obtain depth profiles of macroscopic objects3 or to achieve optical sectioning.4 One of the main qualities of SR-SIM is its extremely efficient use of the available photon budget. As a wide-field imaging technique that can utilize the latest generation of highly sensitive imaging cameras, it collects and detects fluorescence photons with the highest possible efficiency, while also minimizing the amount of excitation power needed to excite fluorescence. This quality, combined with the high imaging speed that this facilitates, also makes SR-SIM one of the most suitable techniques for live cell imaging. Although SR-SIM is, in its original implementation, limited to a factor of approximately 2 in improving the spatial resolution, this barrier can also be superseded with somewhat more sophisticated optical schemes or more fundamentally by exploiting a nonlinear sample response. In this review, we aim to summarize the developments that lead up to the current state-of-the-art in SR-SIM, we describe the different forms in which this method has been implemented, we list typical pitfalls and how they can be avoided, we discuss image reconstruction methods, we compare SR-SIM with recent similar developments based on confocal optics, and we review some of the latest applications of SR-SIM in biological imaging.

2. THE ORIGINS OF SR-SIM The use of periodic illumination patterns (also known as “structured illumination”) is a long-existing methodology that was originally used for surface profiling 3 and similar applications or as a depth discrimination method to reject out-of-focus contributions from different vertical image planes.4 As structured illumination microscopy (SIM) in its current form aims at improving the lateral and axial resolution of fluorescence microscopy, it is instructive to look at early work aimed at improving the optical resolution. Especially noteworthy in this context is the work of Lukosz5,6 in the late 1960s. Lukosz et al. placed a coding illumination structure (stripes7 or 2D patterns6) directly (without the use of lenses) in front of the object to image. They then decoded the patterns by application of a matching structure in the conjugate image plane, which was translated relative to the scanned sample. In a beautiful derivation that bears striking similarities to presentday super-resolution SIM image processing, it is explained why such a Nipkow-disk-like setup leads to an effective increase of the detection passband compared to head-on low numerical aperture (NA) illumination. This work already utilized the Fourier-space description of the situation even though in these setups no individual images were acquired. The technique as described by Lukosz is closely related to synthetic aperture radar, which uses the knowledge of the phase of a moving radar antenna to improve the spatial resolution of radar systems. Compared to present-day SR-SIM, however, there is an important fundamental difference: Transmission SIM based on an elastically scattered (coherent) signal, for fundamental physical reasons, cannot achieve super-resolution beyond Abbe’s far field limit considering both illumination and detection.8 This situation changes, however, fundamentally for incoherent emission such as fluorescence or spontaneous Raman scattering: In this case, the emitted light “forgets” information about the illumination phase, ensuring that the concept of 13891

DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00218 Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 13890−13908

Chemical Reviews

Review

resulting excitation pattern are shown schematically in Figure 1a. In order to successfully reconstruct images in this 2D

further increased the achievable bandwidth. Using TIR illumination launched by an external prism, Frohn et al.14 were able to show a resolution of 100 nm by standing wave illumination. In 2003, two-dimensional structured illumination with unmixing and an interesting concept to reduce the required minimum number of images with different illumination phases was presented.15 The Stemmer group later followed the conceptual presentation of SIM useful for three-dimensional resolution enhancement16 by publishing a conceptual paper on threebeam SR-SIM.17 A very impressive combination of lateral and axial illumination structuring (I5S) was presented by Gustafsson in 2008. 18 Significant advances in the reconstruction approaches and imaging speed were then made over the following years.19−22 Linear structured illumination for fluorescence microscopy improves the resolution essentially by separating spatially structured illumination and spatially resolved detection, and by exploiting the loss of phase relationship (incoherence) between emitters. This leads to the mathematical addition of the (Abbe) frequency limits for excitation and detection. However, by using the sample as a means to distort the linear response between incoming and emitted light, the extraction of higher harmonics can break this factor-of-2 limit. Nonlinear sample responses have been known to achieve super-resolution and form the fundamental basis for super-resolution beyond twice the Abbe limit.15,23 Even though many of the nonlinear approaches yield fundamentally unlimited resolution, the type and strength of nonlinearity will define which resolution is practically achievable for signal-to-noise reasons. Multilinear superposition and saturation effects that occur during switching between molecular states and light-induced changes of the emission ability along with exploiting quantum mechanical coherence in Rabi oscillations have been suggested as possible nonlinear mechanisms useful for extending SIM beyond doubled spatial resolution.24 Such nonlinear effects are essentially also exploited in STED,25,26 and the nonlinearity in photoinduced switching24 is exploited in RESOLFT (reversible saturable optical fluorescence transitions).27 The general concept that a nonlinear sample response leads to a resolution fundamentally beyond Abbe’s limit has been around longer than any specific realizations in fluorescence.28

Figure 1. Schematics of different illumination modes in structured illumination microscopy (SIM). The beams at the rear side of the microscope objective lens are shown relative to the back aperture, limiting the acceptance angle of the back focal plane. For oilimmersion objective lenses with numerical apertures exceeding NA 1.4, relaying the beams to the maximum position off the optical axis leads to total internal reflection at the upper side of the glass coverslip; two-beam illumination results in counterpropagating evanescent waves, penetrating