Surprising Differences in the Reactivity of Cyanoaromatic Radical

vacuum transferred from the flask into an NMR tube containing. CsCHA and ['HICHA, and the detritiation reaction was mon- itored at 297 K. The measured...
0 downloads 0 Views 307KB Size
J . Am. Chem. SOC.1991, 113,358-359

358

iodeprotonation run was opened, and the contents (1.2 mL) were syringed into a flask containing ca. 10 g of polyphosphoric acid (PPA). The reaction of PPA with CHA proceeded slowly, and the flask was heated gently for 1 h. The hydrocarbons were then vacuum transferred from the flask into an NMR tube containing CsCHA and [‘HICHA, and the detritiation reaction was monitored at 297 K. The measured rate constants are tabulated in Table I. All of the rate constants refer to rates/hydrogen. It can be shown that our tritiodeprotonation and protiodetritiation rates are directly comparable, because they result from tracer experiments. The average rate of exchange of cubane is then 0.0060 times that of the ring position in p-xylene. Since this position exchanges 0.1 1 times as fast as benzene,’ the kinetic acidity of cubane is 6.6 X that of benzene. Figure 1 shows that its acidity (6.3 X lo4 times that of cyclohexane) is still, however, almost 5 times that predicted from ‘JCH values (1.3 X IO4 times that of cyclohexane), indicating that there is indeed an enhanced acidity for cubane, but it is much smaller than previously reported. Our result thus supports the enhanced rehybridization effect shown by the calculations. Cubane is also kinetically less acidic than cyclopropane (7.1 X lo4 times the kinetic acidity of cycl~hexane),~ which is qualitatively correct on the basis of s character (31% for cubane vs 32% for cyclopropane). Additional experiments and calculations are in progress to further define the relationships between thermodynamic and kinetic acidities on related systems. Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge research support from the National Science Foundation, Grant CHE87-21134, and the National Institutes of Health (Division of Research Resources, Grant P41 RR 01237).

Surprising Differences in the Reactivity of Cyanoaromatic Radical Anions Generated by Photoinduced Electron Transfer Matthew A. Kellett and David G. Whitten* Department of Chemistry, University of Rochester Rochester, New York 14627 Ian R. Gould Corporate Research Laboratories Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, New York 14650 William R. Bergmark Department of Chemistry, Ithaca College Ithaca, New York 14850 Received August 13, I990 Revised Manuscript Received October 26, 1990 Cyanoaromatics such as 9,lO-dicyanoanthracene (DCA) are widely used as “sensitizers” in photochemical electron transfer reactions.’-” Although it is generally accepted that the excited ( I ) Arnold, D. R.; Du, X. J . Am. Chem. SOC.1989, 1 1 1 , 7666. (2) Popielarz, R.; Arnold, D. R. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1990, 112, 3068. (3) Gassman, P. G. In Photoinduced Electron Transfer; Fox, M. A,, Chanon, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1988; Part C , p 70. (4) Mattes, S. L.; Farid, S.Arc. Chem. Res. 1982, I S , 80. ( 5 ) Arnold, D. R.; Wong,P. C.; Maroulis, A. J.; Cameron, T. S. Pure Appl. Chem. 1980, 52, 2609. (6) Lewis, F. D.; Petisce, J. R. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 6207. (7) Albini, A.; Spreti, S. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 2975. (8) Reichel, L. W.; Griffin, G. W.; Muller, A. J.; Das, P. K.; Ege, S. Can. J . Chem. 1984, 62, 424. (9) Davis, H. F.; Das, P. K.; Reichel, L. W.; Griffin, G.W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6968. (IO) Eaton, D. F. J . Am. Chem. SOC.1980, 102, 3278. ( 1 1 ) Lan, J. Y.; Schuster, G. B. J . Am. Chem. SOC.1985, 107, 6710. (12) Mizuno, K.; Terasaka, K.; Yasueda, M.; Otsuji, Y.Chem. Lett. 1988,

.-*.

lA