Synthesis and biological properties of thiophene ... - ACS Publications

Synthesis and Biological Properties of Thiophene Ring Analogues of Mianserin. Jeffrey W. H.Watthey,*,f Terrence Gavin,n Mahesh Desai,f Barbara M. Finn...
0 downloads 0 Views 1019KB Size
J.Med. Chem. 1983,26, 1116-1122

1116

in water, and the solution was made strongly basic with concentrated NH40H. The aqueous mixture was extracted with 31 CHC13/i-PrOH. The organic extracts were combined, washed with saturated, aqueous NaCl, and dried over N%S04. A colorless solid remained after evaporation of the solvent. This solid was dissolved in absolute ethanol, and 1.1 equiv of D-(-)-(tert-butyoxycarbony1)phenylglycinewas added. The solution was heated to boiling for 10 min and then allowed to stand at room temperature. The crystals were collected by vacuum filtration and dried in the vacuum desiccator: mp 192-194 OC; [ a I z 6(H20) ~ +3.79’. Anal. ( C ~ ~ H Z ~ N ~ * C & ~C,, N H,ON, ~ )0. The compound crystallized as colorless plates, in the space group with two molecules in a unit cell having the dimensions a = 9.557 0.002, b = 6.680 0.001, c = 20.795 f 0.003 A, and 0 = 91.44 f 0.02O. The density calculated for C26H38N404(M, 470.6) is 1.18 g ~ m - The ~ . intensities of 1959 unique reflections were measured on a four-angle diffractometer with Cu K a radiation. The X-ray structure was solved by direct methods and refined by the least-squares method to a value of R = 0.054. Biological Methods. Rat Locomotor Activity. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Industries, Indianapolis, IN) were dosed intraperitoneally with saline or with increasing concentrations of pergolide or (f)-5 (R = Pro). Immediately after injection, the rats were placed in electronic activity monitors (Stoelting Co., Chicago, IL) for a 1-h period. The rats were not allowed to acclimatize to the monitors so that they would have a relatively high level of spontaneous locomotor activity. External stimuli were minimized by isolating the monitors in a soundattenuated laboratory. An activity count registered each time

*

*

the radio-frequency field was interrupted. The monitors were not able to differentiate vertical and horizontal movements. Each animal was used only once, and six to nine rats were employed per group. Each time activity was monitored there was one vehicle control group with the other groups receiving the various drug doses to be tested. Lordotic Behavior in Rats. Chronic ovariectomized LongEvans hooded rats received subcutaneous injections of 100 pg of estrone in sesame oil 48 h prior to testing. Each of the female rats was exposed to a sexually active male rat for 15 mounts prior to the injection of the drug. The compounds were injected subcutaneously, and the animals were reexposed to the male rat 90 min following injection. The results are given in Table VIII.

Acknowledgment. The authors thank Dr. G. M. Maciak and associates for the microanalyses. Registry No. (*)-5 (R = Pr), 74196-92-2; (-)-5 (R = Pr), 85760-74-3; (+)-5 (R = Pr), 85760-75-4; (-)-5 (R = Pr) D-(-)tartrate, 85798-07-8; (-)-5 (R = Pr) HC1,85798-08-9; (+)-5 (R = Pr) L-(+)-tartrate, 85798-09-0; (+)-5 (R = pr) D-(-)-(tert-butyloxycarbonyl)phenylglycine, 85798-10-3; prolactin, 9002-62-4; dopamine, 51-61-6. Supplementary Material Available: Table IX, atomic coordinates and Uij values; Table x, bond lengths; Table XI, bond angles; Table XII, anisotropic temperature factors; Table XIII, hydrogen coordinates; Figure 2, X-ray numbering diagram pertaining to the X-ray structure determination (6 pages). Ordering information is given in any current masthead page.

Synthesis and Biological Properties of Thiophene Ring Analogues of Mianserin Jeffrey W. H. Watthey,*,+Terrence Gavin,?l Mahesh Desai,? Barbara M. Finn,? Ronald K. Rodebaugh,t and Steven L. Pattg Research and Development Department, Pharmaceuticals Division, and Analytical Research Department, CIBA-GEIG Y Corporation, Ardsley, New York 10502, and Varian Instrument Division, Florham Park, New Jersey 07932. Received December 8, 1982 The synthesis of two thiophene-containing analogues of mianserin, Le., 1,2,3,4,10,13b-hexahydro-2-methylpiperazine[ 1,2-a]thieno[2,3-c][ llbenzazepine (2), and the corresponding [3,2-c] isomer (12) is described. The key step in the synthesis is the nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction of the N-lithio derivative of l-methyl-3(2-thieny1)piperazine (4) with the oxazoline derivative of o-anisic acid (7) to give the N-phenylpiperazine 8. This substance was converted via ethyl ester 10 to 1-[2-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl]-4-methyl-2-(2-thienyl)piperazine (3), which was cyclized with polyphosphate ester to a 5:l mixture of 2 and 12. The antidepressant potential of 2 maleate (CGS 11049A) and 12 fumarate (CGS 15413A) were compared with that of mianserin hydrochloride in a variety of biochemical and pharmacological test systems. The three substances exhibited generally similar profiles. However, the results suggest that 2 and 12 bind more strongly to central presynaptic a-receptors than does mianserin.

Mianserin (l),an antidepressant agent currently mar-

fects also appears to be less than that of the classical ant i d e p r e s s a n t ~ . ~The ~ * ~neurobiochemical profile of mianserin differs significantly from that of the classical agents. Thus, mianserin causes pronounced blockade of central (1) Present Address: Department of Chemistry, Iona College,

New Rochelle, NY 10801.

keted in several countries throughout the world, has a level of efficacy comparable with that of amitryptyline and imipramine.2 Significantly, this efficacy is associated with a lower incidence of anticholinergic side effects than that of equitherapeutic doses of the tricyclic d r ~ g s , while ~~?~,~ the liability of mianserin to cause cardiovascular side eft CIBA-GEIGY Corp., Research and Development Department. t

CIBA-GEIGY Corp., Analytical Research Department. Varian Instrument Division.

(2) (a) Brogden, R. N.; Heel, R. C.; Speight, T. M.; Avery, G. S. Drugs 1978,16,273. (b) Zis, A. P.; Goodwin, F. K. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1979, 36, 1097. (c) Cassano, G. B.; Conti, L.; Dell’Osso, L.; Massimetti, G. Adu. Biochem. Psychopharmacol. 1982, 32, 125. (d) Branconnier, R. J.; Cole, J. 0.;Ghazvinian, S.; Rosenthal, S. Ibid. 1982, 32, 195. (3) Kopera, H. Br. J. Clin. Psychiatry 1978, 5, 29s. (4) Montgomery, S. A,; Burgess, C. D.; Montgomery, D. B. In “Progress in the Pharmacotherapy of Depression: Mianserin

HC1”; Drykoningen, G.; Rees, L. W.; Ruiz Ogara, C., Eds., Excerpta Medica: Amsterdam, 1979; pp 60-64. Agnoli, A.; Martucci, N.; Ciabotti, P.; Caratozzolo, P.; Rulli, V.; Sollecito, A. Adu. Biochem. Psychopharmacol. 1982,32, 375.

0022-262318311826-1116$01.50/0 0 1983 American Chemical Society

Thiophene Ring Analogues of Mianserin

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1983, Vol. 26, No. 8 1117 Scheme I1

Scheme I

6

presynaptic a-adrenoreceptors?i6 This may be responsible for the increase in norepinephrine turnover observed, which is also an effect contrary to that produced by the tricyclic antidepressants.Q5p6 There are conflicting reporta concerning the norepinephrine uptake blocking properties of mianserin, but the balance of the evidence suggests that this is not an important property of the drug in viv0.~3~ In common with the tricyclic antidepressants, mianserin has been reported to inhibit histamine-activated adenylate cyclase' and to act as a central 5-HT antagonist.2a18 Numerous publications have appeared that deal with the animal pharmacology or biochemistry of mianserin? and, more recently, the structural requirements for presynaptic a-adrenoreceptor blockade have been described? In order to gain further insight into structure-activity relationships in this area, we decided to prepare thiophene ring analogues of mianserin. Chemistry. We envisioned that 2 could be prepared

7

Scheme I11 r

11 x

9a: R I

9b: R

I

~~

~

~~~

~

~~

(5) Baumann, P. A,; Maitre, L. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 1977, 300, 31. Robson, R. D.; Antonaccio, M. J.; Saelens, J. K.; Liebman, J. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1978, 47, 431. Fludder, J. M.; Leonard, B. E. Psychopharmacology 1979,64, 329. (6) Leonard, B. E. Adv. Biochem. Psychopharmacol. 1981,31,301. (7) Kanof, P. D.; Greengard, P. Nature (London) 1978,272, 329. (8) Maj, J.; Sowinska, H.; Baran, L.; Gancarczyk, L.; Rawlow, A. Psychopharmacology 1978,59, 79. (9) Nickolson, V. J.; Wieringa, J. H. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1981, 33, 760. Nickolson, V. J.; Wieringa, J. H.; van Delft, A. M. L. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg'sArch. Pharmacol. 1982, 319, 48. (10) Kipnis, F.; Ornfelt, J. J . Am. Chem. SOC.1946, 68, 2734. (11) U.S.Patent 4 166 180, 1979; Chem. Abstr. 1978, 88, 89714~. (12) Desai, M.; Watthey, J. W. H.; Zuckerman, M. Org. Prep. Proced. Znt. 1976,8, 85.

CH,

Reaction of the N-lithio derivative of 4 with the oxazoline 713 gave the N-arylpiperazine 8 (Scheme 11). No reaction was observed when 4 was treated with 2-fluorobenzaldehyde or 2-fluorobenzonitrile in Me2S0 at 95 "C in the presence of potassium carbonate. In contrast, both fluoro compounds reacted smoothly with N-methylpiperazine under these conditions14to give the N-arylpiperazines 9.

..2

from the benzyl alcohol 3. This, in turn, would be available from the thienylpiperazine 4 by nucleophilic aromatic substitution by using a reactant containing a substituent that could be transformed into the benzyl alcohol function of 3. 2-(2-Thienyl)piperazine ( 5 ) was prepared by condensation of 2-thienylglyoxal1°with ethylenediamine in ethanol, followed by the addition of sodium borohydride. These conditions have been used previously for the preparation of 2-ary1pipera~ines.l~Methylation of 5 to give 4 was accomplished by a two-step procedure involving lithium aluminum hydride reduction of the monocarbamate 6, which was prepared from 5 by treatment with ethyl chloroformate in acetic acid12 (Scheme I).

12 I

-

CHO

CN

Treatment of 8 with ethanolic sulfuric acid at the reflux gave 10, which was reduced to 3 with lithium aluminum hydride. Cyclization of 3 was accomplished with polyphosphate ester15 in refluxing dichloromethane. Two isomeric products were formed, in a ratio of 51. Both had NMR and mass spectra generally appropriate for the anticipated product. In keeping with other cyclizations onto thiophene rings,16it seems reasonable that the two products were formed via the spiro intermediate 11. This process would involve formation of a six-membered ring with substitution onto the more reactive a-position of the thiophene ring, followed by collapse of the intermediate to either 2 or 12 (Scheme 111). This appears to be the first case in which a rearranged product has been observed on formation of a seven-membered ring by electrophilic ring closure onto a thiophene ring. The two isomers were separated by column chromatography on silica gel. Structural assignment was based on 13C NMR data. Consideration of possible long-range 13C1Hcouplings in the two isomers led to the realization that in 2 a J3 vicinal interaction between HA and C1 would be anticipated, while in 12 this would not be possible. In the spectrum of the major product, the fine structure on (13) Meyers, A. I.; Mihelich, E. D. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1975, 97, 7383. See also Meyers, A. I.; Gabel, R. J. Org. Chem. 1977,42, 2653. Ellefson, C. R.; Prodan, K. A,; Brougham, L. R.; Miller, A. J.Med. Chem. 1980,23,977. (14) Bader, H.; Hansen, A. R.; McCarty, F. J. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 2319. (15) Fieser, L. F.; Fieser, M. "Reagents for Organic Synthesis"; Wiley: New York, 1967; 892-894. (16) Palmer, M. H.; Leitch, D. S.; Greenhalgh,C. W. Tetrahedron 1978,34,1015. Mackay, C.; Waigh, R. D. J. Chem. SOC.,Chem. Commun. 1982, 793.

1118 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1983, Vol. 26,No. 8

Watthey et al.

Table I. "C Chemical Shifts'" of C, and C, in Compounds 2,12,13, and 17 A

2 C, C,

12

(12- 2)

32.79 31.64 -1.15 62.00 63.23 t1.23 '" In parts per million.

the triplet arms of the C1 signal appeared as a doublet of doublets (J1= 5 Hz, J2 = 1-2 Hz; not completely resolved). In the spectrum of the minor product, the corresponding fine structure appeared as a doublet (J= 5 Hz). The 5-Hz couplings were assigned to the HE41 interactions in 2 and 12, while the 1-2-Hz coupling of the major product was assigned to the HA41 interaction anticipated for 2.17 In order to shed further light on the chemistry and spectral data discussed above, we decided to examine the preparation of the tricyclic analogue 13. The amine 14,lS

in contrast to 4, reacted readily with 2-fluorobenzaldehyde in MezSO at 95 OC in the presence of potassium carbonate, to give the aldehyde 15. The failure of the thienylpiperazine 4 to undergo nucleophilic aromatic substitution with 2-fluorobenzaldehyde or 2-fluorobenzonitrile is therefore not due to the inductive effect of the thiophene substituent but to its steric effect, which results from conformational restraints imposed by its attachment to the piperazine ring. H,C"

qp

7J-

qcx /

14 I

15 -

c c

CH3 16 x

Reduction of 15 with sodium borohydride gave the alcohol 16, which was cyclized with polyphosphate ester16 in refluxing dichloromethane to give two isomers in a ratio of 101. In this case, the presence of isomers was detected by NMR, but they could not be separated by column chromatography, and no separation was apparent on TLC. Separation was finally achieved by HPLC (see Experimental Section). The structures of the two isomers were assigned on the basis of lH NMR experiments. First, chemical-shift assignments at 200 MHz were made on the basis of precedent and the gross coupling information. Then, strong resolution enhancement revealed highly detailed coupling information, which, in conjunction with decoupling experiments and iterative spin simulation, allowed unequivocal assignment of every resonance in both isomers. Finally, difference NOE experimentslgwere run, irradiating CH2, and CH2, in both isomers. Irradiation of CH, in the major (17) Confirmation that 1-2 Hz represented a reasonable value for JclHA in 2 was obtained by examination of the spectra of 3methylthiophene and 2-(hydroxymethy1)thiophene. The 3methyl compound clearly showed two 1-1.2-Hz couplings, while the hydroxymethyl compound exhibited line broadening in the fine structure consistent with a 1-2-Hz coupling. (18) Shapiro, S. L.; Parrino, V. A.; Freedman, L. J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1959,81, 3728. (19) McConneil, H. M.; Robertson, R. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1958,29, 1361.

A

13 33.90 56.47

(17- 13)

17

32.59 -1.31 58.08 t1.61

Table 11. In Vitro Determinations of Receptor Binding Affinities IC,,? nM ['HIclonidine ['HI[3H]site site A b Bb prazosin serotonin 3 3 1400 500 2 3 300 100 20 6 1200 300

compd 2 maleate 12 fumarate mianserin hydrochloride a Drugs were tested in triplicate over a wide concentration range in a single experiment. Membranes were prepared from calf cortex for [3H]clonidine binding, from rat forebrain for the [3H]prazosin assay, and from calf caudate nucleus for [3H]serotonin experiments. See Experimental Section for assay procedures. Sites A and B indicate two experimentally observed high-affinity binding sites for [3H]clonidine on calf cortical membranes. Dissociation constants ( K D )are as follows: site A, 1.1 nm; site B, 5.4 nm. Although the two sites are experimentally distinguishable,2o their functional significance is not yet known.

isomer produced no effect on any of the thiophene or aromatic protons, while irradiations of CH2, produced an NOE of 27% to HA and 22% to HE. This could only be consistent with 13 as the structure of the major isomer. Irradiation of CH2, in the minor isomer produced an enhancement of 27% to HA,and irradiation of CH2, an enhancement of 14% to HE. This fixes 17 as the structure of the minor isomer. The 13C spectra of 13 and 17 also

13

17

exhibited changes in the respective chemical shifts of C1 and Cg. These changes very closely paralleled those noted for 2 and 12 (see Table I), thus providing further support for the structures previously assigned to the tetracyclic isomers. Biological Results The maleate salt of 2 (CGS 11049A) and the fumarate salt of 12 (CGS 15413A) were evaluated in a variety of biological test systems, and comparative data on mianserin hydrochloride were also obtained. An in vitro assessment of the cuz-adrenoreceptorblocking properties of the substances was obtained by examination of their interaction with two high-affinity [3H]clonidine binding sites of calf cortex membranes.20v21The ICmvalues are given in Table (20) Braunwalder, A.; Stone, G.; Lovell, R. A. J.Neurochem. 1981, 37, 70. (21) U'Prichard, D. C.; Bechtel, W. D.; Rouot, B. M.; Snyder, S. H. Mol. Pharmacol. 1979, 16, 47.

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1983, Vol. 26, No. 8 1119

Thiophene Ring Analogues of Mianserin

Table 111. In Vivo Determinations of Central Presynaptic aBlockade

compd 2-maleate

12 fumarate mianserin hydrochloride ~

[3H]rauwolscine binding: a ID,,, mg/kg ip (95% CL) 3.3 (1.4-7.9) 2.7 (1.2-5.9) 3.7 (1.6-8.7)

antagonism of clonidine-induced analgesia 4/10 at 30 mg/kgc

noradrenergic single unit act. clonidine dose, mg/kg iv n ID,,, r d k g 3.0 4 82 6.0 2 170 10.0 5 165

4/10 at 1 0 mg/kgc ED,, = 14.9 mg/kg (12.9-17.2)

4.0 8.0

4 4

21 47

~-

a The experimental design always included one vehicle-treated group ( n = 8) and four drug-treated groups (n = 5 per group). The four doses were chosen to cover the appropriate range for ID,, determination. Mice were given the test drug or vehicle intraperitoneally at zero time. [3H]Rauwolscinewas injected intravenously 20 min later, and the mice were sacrificed at 35 min. ID,, values and 95% confidence limits were determined as described by Granat et a1.% Number of mice in which the analgesic effects of 0.1 mg/kg PO of clonidine, as determined in a phenylquinone-induced writhing assay, are reversed by the test substance (administered ip); n = 1 0 per experiment. See Experimental Section for further details. The effectiveness of clonidine in Maximum effects observed, Both higher and lower doses were less effective, inhibiting the firing rate of a single locus coeruleus neuron by 50% ( ID,,) following various doses of the test substances was determined.

Table IV. In Vivo Determinations of Changes in MHPG Levels dose, %of mg/kg MHPG-SO,, compd ip pg/g, i: SE control 2 maleate 0 0.11 i: 0.01 10 0.15 k 0.02 136 20 0.21 i: 0.03a 191 30 0.27 * O . O l b 245 mianserin 0 0.11 i 0.01 hydrochloride 30 0.19 i: O . O l b 180 Five rats were used for p < 0.001. a p < 0.01. each experiment. Animals were sacrificed 2 h after administration of test agent in corn starch suspension. MHPG-SO, levels (whole brain) were determined by the procedure of Meek and Neff.”

11, together with those for [3H]prazosin binding sites,22 which give an indication of al-adrenoreceptor blocking properties. Table I1 also shows the effects of the compounds on [3H]serotonin receptor binding.23 Three in vivo assays were used to confirm the interaction of the compounds with central a2-receptors. In the first ([3H]rauwolscine binding), the ability of the test agent (administered ip) to displace rauwolscine from mouse forebrain was determined.24 In the second (antagonism of clonidine-induced analgesia), the ability of the test substances, administered ip to mice, to antagonize analgesic effects of clonidine, as determined in a phenylquinone-induced writhing assay,25was determined. In the third (noradrenergic single unit activity), the effect of 2 maleate and l.HC1 (administered intravenously) on the ability of clonidine to suppress the firing rate of a single rat locus coeruleus neuron was determined.26 Data from these three assays are presented in Table 111. In order to supplement the data on presynaptic aadrenoreceptor blockade, the effect of 2 maleate and 1.HC1 on norepinephrine turnover as evidenced by changes in (22) Greengrass,P.; Bremner, R. Eur. J. Pharrnacol. 1979,55,323. Hornung, R.;Presek, P.; Glossmann, H. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1979,308,223.Langer, S.Z.; Massingham, R.; Shepperson,N. B. Br. J. Pharrnacol. 1980,70,60P. (23) Bennett, J. P.;Snyder, S. H. Mol. Pharmacol. 1976,12,373. (24) Granat, F. R.; Stone, G. A.; Lovell, R. A. to be submitted to Eur. J. Pharmacol. (25) Fielding, S.;Wilker, J.; Hynes, M.; Szewczak, M.; Novick, W. J.; Lal, H. J. Pharrnacol. Exp. Ther. 1978,207,899. (26) Engberg, G.; Svensson, T. H. Commun. Psychopharmacol. 1980,4,233.

Table V. In Vitro Determination of Antihistamine Activity compd

H I +H,b

2 maleate 1 2 fumarate mianserin hydrochloride

0.28 0.09 0.19

HZb 19 7.2 3.8

a The percent inhibitions of histamine or 4-methylhistamine activation of an adenylate cyclase preparation from guinea pig cerebral cortex were determined (average of triplicates) over a wide concentration range, and IC,, valActivation ues were calculated from the resulting data. of guinea pig cerebral cortex adenylate cyclase by histamine is mediated by both H,and H, receptors, whereas activation by 4-methylhistamine is mediated by H, receptors only.28

Table VI. Determination of Antidepressant Potential by Using the Behavioral Despair Model” compd duration, s control 82.0 2 maleate 184.6b control 90.8 mianserin hydrochloride 185.6 a Sixty minutes after ip injection of the test agent at 1 0 mg/kg ip, ten CF1 male mice (18-22 g) were placed into cylinders containing 6 cm of tap water at 21-23 “C for a total of 6 min. Only the duration of immobility occurring during the last 4 min was counted. Significance was determined by use of the rank sum test. p 4 0.05.

3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol(MHPG) levels was determined2’ following ip administration of the test agents to rats. The data are given in Table IV. The antihistamine activity of the two thiophene compounds and of mianserin hydrochloride were determined in vitro by using the adenylate cyclase procedures developed by Psychoyos.28 The data obtained in these studies are presented in Table V. Finally, an attempt was made to compare the antidepressant potential of 2 maleate with that of mianserin hydrochloride by use of the behavioral despair or acquired immobility model of Porsolt et al.29 The data obtained are presented in Table VI. ~~~

~~

(27) Meek, J. L.; Neff, N. H. Br. J. Pharrnacol. 1972,45,435. (28) Psychoyos, S.Biochem. Pharrnacol. 1981,30,2182. (29) Porsolt, R. D.;Anton, G.; Blavet, N.; Jalfre, M. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1978,47,378.Gorka, 2.;Wojtasik, E. Pol. J. Pharmacol. Pharm. 1980,32,463.

1120 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1983, Vol. 26, No. 8 T h e tricyclic analogue 13 demonstrated no biological activity in t h e above test systems.

Discussion As might be anticipated from the structural relationship of 2 and 12 t o mianserin, t h e three substances exhibited generally similar profiles of activity in t h e test systems employed. However, the two thiophene compounds appear t o be more active as central presynaptic a-receptors than does mianserin. They exhibited greater affinity for highaffinity clonidine site A than did mianserin, and in the case of thiophene analogue 2 this was reflected in greater potency in the noradrenergic single unit activity experiments and in the determinations of MHPG levels following ip administration of the test substances. In contrmt, binding to high-affinity clonidine site B, [3H]rauwolscine binding, and antagonism of clonidine-induced analgesia were similar for all three compounds. There is also an indication that mianserin is a more potent antagonist of H2 receptor mediated adenylate cyclase than thiophene analogue 2. These differences could be of significance in view of two currently held hypotheses. A considerable body of evidence suggests that the therapeutic effects of antidepressant drugs may be due t o t h e development of subsensitivity of the norepinephrine receptor coupled adenylate cyclase system.30 Such an effect has been demonstrated for mianserin in rat brain,3O and could be explained by t h e a2-adrenoreceptor blocking properties of this drug.S An alternative hypothesis' suggests that the therapeutic effects of antidepressants may be associated with central antihistamine (H2)effects. The present study indicates that 2, 12, and mianserin all have high affinity for the H2 receptor, while mianserin has also been shown to be highly active in the system employed b y Kanof and Greengard.7 Thus, further study of 2 and 12 should provide useful information on the validity of these hypotheses. Experimental Section Melting points were determined on a Thomas-Hoover Unimelt apparatus and are uncorrected. NMR spectra were obtained on a Varian EM 390, XL-100, XL-200, or CFT-20 instrument. The iterative spin simulation was performed via a LAOCOON program with magnetic equivalence as implemented on the XL-200. IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 137 spectrophotometer, and mass spectra were recorded on an A.E.I. MS 902 spectrometer. 2-(2-Thienyl)piperazine(5). A solution of ethylenediamine (4.1 g, 0.068 mol) in EtOH (25 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of 2-thienylglyoxalhydratelo (10.0 g, 0.063 mol) in EtOH (250 mL) at 0 OC under an atmosphere of dry Nz. The cooling bath was removed, and the reaction mixture was stirred for an additional 1.5 h. Sodium borohydride (4.8 g, 0.126 mol) was added, all at once, and a cooling bath used to control the exotherm. Stirring was continued for an additional 18 h. Water (25 mL) was added, and the EtOH was removed under reduced pressure. The remaining aqueous solution was extracted with CH2Cl2(3 x 100 mL), and the extracts were dried (KZCO3). Removal of the solvent under reduced pressure gave 5 as an off-white solid (5.2 g, 52%). An analytical sample was obtained by addition of an E t 2 0 solution of 5 to an E t 2 0 solution of oxalic acid dihydrate. The resulting precipitate was washed with E t 0 and MeOH and the free base (mp 81-83 "C) was obtained with saturated K2COs: IH NMR 6 7.27, 7.04 (m, 1 H; m, 2 H; thiophene protons), 4.05 (d of d, 1 H; methine proton), 2.90 (m, 6 H), 1.87 (8, 2 H; NH); IR 3250 (NH) cm-'; MS, m/e (relative intensity) 168 (M', 15), 138 ( E ) , 125 (loo), 110 (70). Anal. (CsHlzN2S)C, H, N. Ethyl 3-(2-Thienyl)piperazine-l-carboxylate (6). A solution of ethyl chloroformate (20.4 g, 0.19 mol) in HOAc (150 mL) was added dropwise with stirring to a solution of 5 (31.6 g, 0.19 mol) (30) Mishra, R.; Janowsky, A.; Sulser, F. Neuropharmacology1980, 19, 983.

Watthey et al.

in HOAc (150 mL) at 65 "C under an atmosphere of dry N2. After 1h, the solution was allowed to cool to room temperature, and stirring was maintained for an additional 16 h. The reaction mixture was added to chilled 10 N NaOH (750 mL), and ice was added to control the exotherm. The mixture was extracted with CHzC12 (4 X 300 mL). The organic solution was dried (K2C03), and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to give 6 (30.0 g) as a light brown oil. This material was dissolved in MeOH (250 mL), and the solution was added to a solution of maleic acid (18.6 g, 1equiv) in MeOH (250 mL). The mixture was treated with charcoal, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to give an oil, which crystallized on trituration with EtOAc. A yield of 44.0 g (65%) of 6 maleate, mp 165-166 O C , was obtained: 'H NMR 6 7.68,7.41, 7.16 (d, 1H; d, 1H; d of d, 1H, thiophene protons), 6.18 (s,2 H; maleic acid vinyl protons), 4.76 (d of d, 1H methine proton), 4.16 (m, 4 H), 3.36 (m, 4 H), 1.25 (t,3 H); MS, m/e (relativeintensity) 240 (M+,451,116 (100). Anal. (C11Hl~Nz0zSC4H40~) C, H, N. l-Methyl-3-(2-thienyl)piperazine (4). A solution of 6 (27.2 g, 0.11 mol) in Et20 (300 mL) was added to a stirred suspension of LiAlH4 (10.8 g, 0.28 mol) in EBO (1300 mL). The mixture was refluxed for 12 h, cooled to room temperature, and worked up.31 The Et20 solution was dried (KzC03)and evaporated to give 4 (18.4 g, 89%) as a light yellow oil, which was converted to the maleate salt as described above. A yield of 28 g of 4 maleate, mp 123-124.5 OC, was obtained: 'H NMR 6 7.50, 7.32,7.08 (d of d, 1 H; d, 1 H; d of d, 1 H; thiophene protons), 6.2 (8, 2 H; maleic acid vinyl protons), 4.65 (d of d, 1 H; methine proton), 2.8 [m, 9 H, including 6 2.50 (e, CH3)];MS, m/e (relative intensity) 182 (M', 80), 138 (39, 110 (100). Anal. (C9Hl4N2SC4H4O4) C, H, N. 1-[ 2 44,4-Dimethyl-1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)phenyl]-4-met hyl-2(2-thieny1)piperazine(8). A solution of 4 (8.5 g, 0.046 mol) in dry THF (60 mL) was cooled to -78 OC under an atmosphere of dry Nz. n-Butyllithium in hexane (18 mL of 2.6 N) was added to the stirred solution during 5 min. The temperature of the resulting suspension was raised to 0 "C, and stirring was maintained for 0.5 h. A solution of 713 (9.5 g, 0.046 mol) in dry THF (90 mL) was added during 45 min. The reaction mixture became dark. Stirring was continued for an additional 1h at 0 OC and then at room temperature for 18 h. Water (15 mL) was added, and the THF was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was partitioned between EBO (150 mL) and HzO (75 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with Et20 (2 X 50 mL), and the combined organic solutions were washed with saturated aqueous K&03 (75 mL) and dried (K2C03). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was washed with petroleum ether (100 mL) to give 8 (11.8 g, 72%). An analytical sample was obtained by recrystallization from petroleum ether: mp 114-115 O C ; 'H NMR 6 7.25 (m, 7 H; aromatic protons), 4.80 (d of d, 1 H; methine proton), 4.16 (s,2 H; oxazoline CH2), 3.53 (m, 1H), 2.75 [m, 8 H, including 6 2.37 (s, CH3)], 1.43 (s, 6 H; oxazoline CH,'s); IR 1660 (C=N) cm-l; MS, m/e (relative intensity) 355 (M+, 30), 285 (loo), 203 (85). Anal. (C20H25N30S) C, H, N. l-(2-Carbethoxyphenyl)-4-methyl-2-(2-t hieny1)piperazine (10). A solution of 8 (33.1 g, 0.090 mol) in ethanolic sulfuric acid (2.2 L of 1.5 N) was refluxed for 12 h. Approximately 75% of the EtOH was removed under reduced pressure, and the remaining solution was poured into saturated K&03 (1000 mL). This solution was extracted with CH2Clz(4 X 350 mL), and the extracts were dried (K2C0,) and evaporated. The resulting oil was purified by column chromatography with silica gel (600 g, solvent EtOAc). The ester 10 was isolated as a major component (30 9). The maleate salt was prepared as described above to give 10 maleate (28.2 g, 68%): mp 145-147 OC; 'H NMR 6 7.72, 7.20, 6.78 (d, 1 H; m, 5 H; d of d, 1 H; aromatic protons), 6.41 (s, 2 H; maleic acid vinyl protons), 5.12 (d of d, 1 H; methine proton), 4.42 (q, 2 H; OCHzprotons), 3.33 [m, 9 H, including 6 2.9 (s,3 H, N-CH,)], 1.43 (t, 3 H, C-CH,); IR 1720 (C=O) cm-l; MS, m/e (relative intensity) 300 (M+,-30), 286 (30), 274 (100). Anal. '(CI8Hz2N202SC4H404) C, H, N. 1-[ 2-(Hydroxymethyl)phenyl]-4-methyl-2-(2-thienyl)(31) In ref 15, p 583.

Thiophene Ring Analogues of Mianserin

piperazine (3). A solution of 10 (10.7 g, 0.032 mol) in Et20 (225 mL) was added to a stirred suspension of LiAlH4(3.9 g, 0.097 mol) in EtzO (150 mL). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 12 h, cooled to room temperature, and worked up.31 The resulting colorless oil crystallized to give analytically pure 3 (9.3 g, 98%): mp 81-83 "C; lH NMR 6 7.13, 6.80 (m, 5 H; m, 2 H; aromatic protons), 4.80 (m, 4 H; methine proton; CHzOH protons), 2.90 (m, 6 H), 2.40 (s,3 H, N-CH,); MS, m/e (relative intensity) 288 (M', 60), 135 (45), 110 (85),97 (95),71 (100). Anal. (C1&&0S) C, H, N. 1,2,3,4,10,13b-Hexahydro-2-met hylpiperazino[ lJ-83thieno[2,3-c][ llbenzazepine (2) and the Corresponding [3,2-c]Isomer (12). A solution of 3 (4.7 g, 0.016 mol) and polyphosphate ester15 (93 g) in CHzCl2 (930 mL) was refluxed for 12 h. The solution was cooled to room temperature, and the precipitated solid was filtered off. This material was partitioned between CHzClz(300 mL) and saturated NH40H (300 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with CHzClz (2 X 75 mL), and the combined organic solutions were washed with saturated NaCl(100 mL) and dried (K2CO3). Evaporation of the solvent gave 3.1 g of an oil, which was chromatographed on silica gel (75 9). Elution with EtOAc gave two discrete fractions. Fraction 1 (2,2.4 g, 45% yield) had an Rr of 0.2 on TLC; fraction 2 (12,500mg, 9.3% yield) had an R of 0.08 (solvent EtOAc). 2: lH NMR 6 7.17 (m, 4 H, HE, HF, I& HH), , 6.88 (d, 1 H, HB),6.66 (d, Jm = 5 Hz, 1 H, HA), = 10.2 Hz, J c = 2.7 4.71 (d, 1 H, HW),4.08 (d of d of d, J c 14 Hz, 1 H, !$), 2.36 Hz, Jc = 0.8 Hz, 1 H, Hc), 3.41 (d, (s,3 XCH,,), 2.16-3.67 (6 H, CH,, CH2,, CHzJ; 13CNMR 32.79 (t,Ci), 45.55 (9, cle),51.36 (t,cd,55.19 (t,c7), 62.00 (d, Ce), 65.57 (t, CD), 119.90 (d, Cis), 121.52 (d, Cis), 122.54 (d, C3), 126.54 (d, Clz), 127.02 (d, C.J, 127.81 (d, C14), 136.29 (e, C11), 136.99 (8, C4), 140.41 (e, C5), 149.14 (8, Clo) ppm. Anal. for 2 maleate (CGS 11049A), mp 187-188.5 "C, (C16H&&C&404) C, H, N. 12: lH NMR 6 7.06 (m, 4 H, HE, HF, HG,H ~ 1 ~ 6 . 9(d, 6 1 H, HB),6.71 (d, J = 5 Hz, 1 H, HA), 4.44 (d, 1 H, HD?),4.18 (d of d of d, Jc = 2.7 Hz, Jc,D, = 0.8 Hz, 1 H, Hc), 3.38 (d, JDD. = 13.5 Hz, 1% HD),2.36 ( 8 , 3 H, CH3,), 2.16-3.68 (m, 6 H, C H 2 , CHz,, CHz 1; 13CNMR 31.64 (t, Cl), 45.66 (q, Cle), 51.34 (t, CJ, 55.42 (t, C>, 63.23 (d, Ce), 63.32 (t,Cg), 119.94 (d, Cis), 120.56 (d, Cz3), 122.46 (d, C3), 126.41 (d, Clz), 127.34 (d, C2), 127.83 (d, C14), 135.09 (8, Cll), 136.32 (8, C4), 139.72 (8, C5), 149.51 (8, Clo) ppm. Anal. for 12 fumarate (CGS 15413A),mp 198-201 "C, (CleHl8N2SC4H4O4) C, H, N. The mass spectra of the two isomers were essentially identical: m/e (relative intensity) 270 (M', 100), 226 (22), 199 (63), 72 (70). 1-(2-Formylpheny1)-4-methylpiperazine (9a). Anhydrous K2CO3 (21.6 g, 0.016 mol) was added to a solution of N methylpiperazine (8.0 g, 0.08 mol) and 2-fluorobenzaldehyde(10.0 g, 0.08 mol) in MezSO (100 mL). The mixture was maintained at 95 "C with stirring for 24 h and then cooled and poured into HzO (400 mL). The solution was acidified with 6 N HC1 and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 X 200 mL). The aqueous solution was made basic with 10% NaOH and extracted with CH2C12(3 X 200 mL), and the extracts were dried (KzCO3). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was distilled to give analytically pure 9a (7.4 g, 45%) as a pale yellow oil: bp 132 "C (0.2 mm); 'H NMR 6 10.36 (s, 1 H; CHO), 7.33 (m, 4 H; aromatic protons), 3.10 (m, 4 H), 2.57 (m, 4 H), 2.33 (8, 3 H; N-CHJ; IR 1675 (C=O) cm-l. Anal. (C12H18N20)C, H, N. 1-(2-Cyanophenyl)-4-methylpiperazine (9b). This substance was obtained by the method used for the preparation of 9a. Use of 2-fluorobenzonitrile(9.7 g, 0.08 mol) gave analytically pure 9b (6.9 g, 41%) as a pale yellow oil: bp 123-124 "C (0.1 mm); lH NMR 6 7.43,6.95 (m, 2 H; m, 2 H; aromatic protons), 3.2 (m, 4 H), 2.6 (m,4 H), 2.33 (s, 3 H,N-CH3); IR 2200 (C=N)cm-l. Anal. (C12HisN3) C, H, N. Z-[Methyl(2-thienylmethyl)amino]benzaldehyde (15). Following the procedure used for the preparation of 9a,amine 1418(21.2 g, 0.17 mol) gave analytically pure 15 (23.3 g, 61%) as a pale yellow oil: bp 126-128 "C (0.035 mm); 'H NMR 6 10.52 (8, 1 H, CHO), 7.90, 7.53,7.10 (m, 1 H; m, 1 H, m, 5 H; aromatic protons), 4.50 (s, 2 H), 2.88 (s, 3 HI. Anal. (C13H13NOS)C, H, N. 2-[Methyl(2-thienylmethyl)amino]benzyl Alcohol (16). A solution of 15 (11.6 g, 0.05 mol) and sodium borohydride (3 g, 0.08 mol) in i-PrOH (150 mL) was refluxed for 18 h. The solvent was

&$=

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1983, Vol. 26, No. 8 1121 evaporated, and the residue was partitioned between Et20 (150 mL and H 2 0 (100 mL). The EtzO solution was washed with saturated KzCO3 (3 X 100 mL) and saturated NaCl(100 mL) and dried (K,C03). The solution was evaporated, and the residue was distilled to give analytically pure 16 (10.7 g, 91%)as a pale yellow oil: bp 132 "C (0.02 mm); 'H NHR 6 7.0 (m, 7 H; aromatic protons), 4.82 (s, 2 H; benzyl CHJ, 4.57 (s, 1 H; OH), 4.26 (s, 2 H), 2.67 ( 8 , 3 H; N-CH3). Anal. (C13H15NOS)C, H, N. 4,10-Dihydro-9-methyl-9H-thieno[2,3-c][ llbenzazepine (13)and the Corresponding [3,2-c]Isomer (17). A solution of 16 (10.0 g) and polyphosphate ester15(200 g) in CH2C12(1 L) was refluxed for 18 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was stirred with H2O (2 L) for 3 days. The aqueous solution was made basic with 10% KOH and extracted with CHzC12(3 X 250 mL). The CHzCl2 extracts were dried (KzC03)and evaporated under reduced pressure to give 9.3 g of a yellow solid. The two isomers were separated by HPLC with a Waters Prep 500A machine with silica gel columns and cyclohexane/toluene (1:l) as the solvent system. 13: 'H NMR 6 7.32 (t of m, JGH = 7.96 Hz, 1 H, HG),7.23 (d of m, JEG = 1.66 Hz, Jm = 0.37 Hz, 1 H, HE),7.21 (d, Jm 0.2 Hz, 1 H, HH), 7.09 (d of m, 1 H, HB),7.06 (t of m, JFG = 7.44 Hz, JFE = 7.41 Hz, JFH = 1.21 Hz, 1 H, HF),6.86 (d of m, JAB = 5.02 Hz, JAC = 0.43 Hz, Jm = 0.40 Hz, 1 H, HA),4.26 (m, JCA = 0.43 Hz, JCB = 0.76 Hz, 2 H, CHz,), 4.06 (m, JDE = 0.64 Hz, JDA = 0.40 Hz, JDG = 0.36 Hz, JDB = 0.31 Hz, JDF0.26 Hz, 2 H, CH2 ),3.01 ( ~ , H, 3 CH3,); 13CNMR 33.90 (t,Cl), 43.14 (q, c13),56.47 c&118.71 (d, C12), 121.40 (d, Clo), 123.02 (d, C3), 127.27 (d, Cg), 128.05 (d, Cz), 128.57 (d, C11), 134.41 (a, CB), 134.81 (8, C4), 137.36 (e, C&, 150.91 (8, C,) ppm. Anal. (C13H13NS)C, H, N. 17: 'H NMR 6 7.15 (t of m, 1 H, HG), 7.01 (d of m, Jw = 1.59 Hz, 1 H, HE),7.00 (d of m, J H G = 7.99 Hz, JHE = 0.37 Hz, J H I= 0.2 Hz, 1 H, HH), 6.88 (t of m, JFG = 7.48 Hz, JFE= 7.42 Hz, JFH = 1.24 Hz, 1 H, HF), 6.76 (d of m, 1 H, HB), 6.45 (d of m, JAB = 5.22 Hz, 1 H, HA),3.98 (m, Jm 1.26 Hz, JDE = 0.64 Hz, JDG = 0.36 Hz, JDA = 0.37 Hz, J D B = 0.30 Hz, JDF = 0.14 Hz, 2 H, CHZ,), 3.88 (m, JCA = 0.37 Hz, 2 H, CH,), 2.73 ( s , 3 H, CH3). T' measurements on all protons of 13 and 17 were performed and were entirely consistent with the indicated assignments: "C NMR 32.59 (t, Cl), 43.32 (q, C13), 58.08 (t,Ce), 118.83 (d, Clz), 121.01 (d, Clo), 122.96 (d, C3), 127.12 (d, CD), 127.60 (d, Cz) 127.72 (d, C11), 134.01 (8, Cg, C4), 137.0 (9, C6),152.46 (8, C7)ppm. The mass spectra of the two isomers were essentially identical: m/e (relative intensity) 215 (M', loo), 200 (30), 199 (22). Biological Test Procedures. The [3H]clonidinebinding assay was performed by the method of Braunwalder et alaz0and [3H]prazosinbinding by the procedure described by Greengrass and Bremner,22omitting ascorbic acid from the incubation medium. Serotonin receptor binding was determined by a modification of the procedure described by Bennett and Snyder,23 homogenization being conducted at pH 7.7 at 25 "C using a medium containing 10 mM dithiothreitol. The final pellet was homogenized in a medium containing 120 mM NaC1,5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaC12,l mM MgClz, and 10 mM dithiothreitol in addition to the components originally specified.23 The [3H]rauwolscine binding assay was performed by the method of Granat et al.% For the antagonism of clonidine-induced analgesia assay, a modification of the phenylquinone-writhing procedure described by Fielding et al.25was employed. Thirty minutes after ip injection of the test substance, male mice (18-22 g) were injected PO with clonidine. Twenty minutes later, phenylquinone was injected ip, and the number of mice that writhed was counted 5-15 min after injection. Any animal writhing was considered a reactor. Noradrenergic single unit activity was determined by using procedures described by Engberg and SvenssonQZ6Changes in MHPG levels were determined by the procedure of Meek and Neff.27 Inhibition of histamine-activated adenylate cyclase was determined by the procedures of Psychoyos.2s Swim test results were obtained by using the procedure of Porsolt et al.29

k,

Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. H. B. Renfroe for his encouragement a n d support of this work. We are also grateful for valuable discussions of t h e biological test results with Drs. W. D. Cash, R. A. Lovell, S. Psychoyos, and G. P. Quinn. We thank L. Raabis for IR and N M R spectra (EM 390), C. Shimanskas for t h e mass spectra, a n d G .

J. Med. Chem. 1983,26, 1122-1126

1122

Robertson and R. Oekinghaus for microanalytical data. We also thank the following for providing the biological test resulb: c. Atkins, B. Barbaz, A. Braunwalder, F. R. Granat, D,Johnson, H. J. Kalinsky, Dr. S, psychoyos, M, G' A' Stone' and J' We are grateful to Makar and Vivian for preparing the typescript. Registry No. 2,85803-58-3; 2 maleate, 85803-59-4; 3, 85803J*

57-2; 4, 85803-52-7; 4 maleate, 85803-53-8; 5, 85803-49-2; 6, 85803-50-5; 6 maleate, 85803-51-6; 7,57598-33-1; 8, 85803-54-9; 9% 85803-62-9; 9b, 85803-63-0; 10, 85803-55-0; 10 maleate, 85803-56-1;12,85803-60-7;12 fUmal'ate, 85803-61-8;13,85803-66-3; 14, 58255-18-8; 15, 85803-64-1; 16, 85803-65-2; 17, 85803-67-4; 2-thienylglyoxa1, 51445-63-7; ethylenediamine, 107-15-3; Nmethylpiperazine, 109-01-3; 2-fluorobenzal&hyde, 446-52-6; 2fluorobenzonitrile, 394-47-8.

Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of Some 3-[ (Alkylthio)methyl]quinoxaline 1-Oxide Derivatives John P. Dirlam,*vt Joseph E. Presslitz,? and B. J. Williamst Pfizer Central Research, Groton, Connecticut 06340, and Pfizer Animal Health Research Department, Terre Haute, Indiana 47808. Received September 1, 1982 Some 34(alkylthio)methyl]quinoxaline1-oxide derivatives (1) have been synthesized and screened for antibacterial activity. 2-Acetyl-3-[(methylsulfonyl)methyl]quinoxaline1-oxide (7a) was found to possess good in vitro activity against some pathogens important to veterinary medicine including Treponema hyodysenteriae, a causative agent in swine dysentery. In an in vivo experiment, this compound (7a) completely protected pigs against a swine dysentery challenge over a 21-day period.

A wide variety of quinoxaline 1,Cdioxides have been described of value as antibacterial agents, animal growth promotants, and as agents for improving feed efficiency of Although a number of reports deal with the chemistry of quinoxaline 1-oxides: only a few describe useful in vitro antibacterial activity.6 Furthermore, to our knowledge, no quinoxaline 1-oxides have been reported with in vivo antibacterial activity. This paper describes the synthesis of certain 3-[(alkylthio)methyl]quinoxaline 1-oxide derivatives (1) having in vitro antibacterial activity against some pathogens important to veterinary medicine, i.e., Escherichia coli, Pasteurella multocida, Salmonella choleraesuis, and Treponema hyodysenteriae, as well as in vivo activity against swine dysentery.

1, n = 1, 2

0

2 (carbadox)

Synthesis. Until recently there were few methods available for the selective synthesis of suitable 2,3-disubstituted quinoxaline 1-oxide precursors required for this study, but it has been demonstrated in these laboratories that certain quinoxaline 1,4-dioxidesbearing an electronwithdrawing group in the 2-position can be selectively monodeoxygenated to afford good yields of the desired starting materialsa6 In particular, the 3-[ (alkylthio)methyllquinoxaline 1-oxide compounds (1) were prepared in the manner shown in Scheme I. Several 2-substituted ~ converted to 3-methylquinoxaline 1-oxides ( 3 a - ~ )were the corresponding 3-bromomethyl derivatives (4a-c) via bromination with bromine-methanol. Alternatively, the chloromethyl intermediate 4d was obtained from a 3methylquinoxaline 1,Cdioxide by selective deoxygenation and simultaneous chlorination of the methyl group with t Pfizer

Central Research.

* Pfizer Animal Health Research Department.

p-toluenesulfonyl chloride.' Various alkylthio side chains were added to intermediate 4 to afford 5 by procedures developed previously for the synthesis of 2(3)-[(alkylthio)methyl]quinoxaline 1,4-dioxides (method A).8 Oxidation of the sulfur with 1or 2 equiv of m-chloroperbenzoic acid (MCPBA), method B or C, gave rise to the corresponding sulfoxides 6 or sulfones 7, respectively. Alternatively, 7 could be synthesized from 4 in a one-step process by a displacement reaction with sodium alkylsulfinates (method D). The aminolysiss of 6 or 7, where R1= C02CH3,allowed the synthesis of some carboxamides (R, = CONH2,CONHCH,; method E). The deacylation of 6 or 7, where R1= COCH,, afforded analogues unsubstituted in the 2-position (R, = H; method F). la) J. Francis, J. K. Landquist, A. A. Levi, J. S. Silk, and J. M. Thorp, Biochem. J., 63, 455 (1956). (b) J. D. Johnston, M. Abu-el-Haj, E. Abushanab, B. W. Dominy, J. W. McFarland, C. H. Issidorides, and M. J. Haddadin, IUPAC Meeting, London, July 1968, Abstracts, H 4, p 437; "Abstrcts of Papers", 156th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Atlantic City, Sept 1968, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1968,Abstr MEDI 015. (c) G. W. Thrasher, J. E. Shively, C. E. Askelson, W. E. Babcock, and R. R. Chalquest, J . Anim. Sci., 31, 333 (1970). (d) K. Ley and F. Seng, Synthesis, 415 (1975), and references cited therein. J. P. Dirlam and J. E. Presslitz, J.Med. Chem., 21,483 (1978). J. P. Dirlam, L. J. Czuba, B. W. Dominy, R. B. James, R. M. Pezzullo, J. E. Presslitz, and W. W. Windisch, J. Med. Chem., 22, 1118 (1979). (a) M. J. Haddadin, H. N. Alkaysi, and S. E. Saheb, Tetruhe26,1115 (1970). (b) M. M. El Abadelah, S. S. Sabri, and H. I. Tashtoush, Tetrahedron, 35,2571 (1979). (c) A. F. Kluge, M. L. Maddox, and G. S. Lewis, J. Org. Chem., 45,1909 (1980), and references cited therein. (a) M. L. Douglass, US.Patent 3733323 (1973);Chem. Abstr., 79,42557~(1973). (b) J. M. Cox and R. A. Burrell, U.S. Patent 3928608 (1975). J. P. Dirlam and J. W. McFarland, J. Org. Chem., 42, 1360 (1977). M. Harmana and M. Yamazaki, Chem. Phurm. Bull., 11, 415 (1963). J. P. Dirlam, U.S. Patent 4039540 (1977); Chem. Abstr., 87, 152275~(1977). B. B. Jarvis and B. A. Marien, J.Org. Chem.,42,2676 (1977).

0022-2623/83/1826-1122$01.50/0 0 1983 American Chemical Society