Subscriber access provided by Fudan University
Article
Synthesis and Functional Characterization of Caffeic Acid Glucoside Using Leuconostoc mesenteroides Dextransucrase Seung-Hee Nam, Young-Min Kim, Marie K Walsh, Young-Jung Wee, Kwang-Yeol Yang, Jin-A Ko, Songhee Han, Thi Thanh Hanh Nguyen, Ji Young Kim, and Doman Kim J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00344 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Mar 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 9, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Synthesis and Functional Characterization of Caffeic Acid Glucoside Using
2
Leuconostoc mesenteroides Dextransucrase
3
4
Seung-Hee Nam,a,†,* Young-Min Kim,b, f, † Marie K. Walsh,c Young-Jung Wee,d Kwang-Yeol
5
Yang,e Jin-A Ko,f Songhee Han,g Thi Thanh Hanh Nguyen,h Ji Young Kim,g and Doman
6
Kimg, h, *
7
8
a
9
10
South Korea. b
11
12
c
d
Department of Food Science and Technology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongbuk 38541, South Korea
e
17
18
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Sciences, Utah State University, 8700 Old Main Hill, 750N 1200E, 84322-8700, Logan, UT, USA.
15
16
Department of Food Science & Technology and BK21 Plus Program, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, South Korea.
13
14
Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186,
Department of Plant Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186, South Korea.
f
Bio-energy Research Center, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
19
g
20
21
Department of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, Gangwon do 25354, South Korea
h
22
Institute of Food Industrialization, Institutes of Green Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University, Gangwon-do 25354, South Korea
23 24 25
†
26
*
27
Seung-Hee Nam, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Chonnam National University,
28
Gwangju 61186, South Korea. TEL: +82-62-530-0620; Fax: +82-62-530-2149, E-mail: namsh1000@
29
hanmail.net.
30
Doman Kim, Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University,
31
Gangwon-do 25354, South Korea. TEL & Fax: +82-633-339-5736; E-mail: kimdm@ snu.ac.kr
These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to:
32
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 35
Page 3 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
33
ABSTRACT: Caffeic acid was modified via transglucosylation, using sucrose and
34
dextransucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides B‐512FMCM. Following enzymatic
35
modification, a caffeic acid glucoside was isolated by butanol separation, silica gel
36
chromatography, and preparative HPLC. The synthesized caffeic acid glucoside had a
37
molecular mass-to-charge ratio of 365 m/z and its structure was identified as caffeic acid-3-O-
38
α-D-glucopyranoside. The production of this caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside at a
39
concentration of 153 mM was optimized using 325 mM caffeic acid, 355 mM sucrose, and
40
650mU mL-1 dextransucrase in the synthesis reaction. In comparison with the caffeic acid, the
41
caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside displayed 3-fold higher water solubility, 1.66-fold
42
higher anti-lipid peroxidation effect, 15% stronger inhibition of colon cancer cell growth and
43
11.5-fold higher browning resistance. These results indicate that this caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-
44
glucopyranoside may be a suitable functional component of food and pharmaceutical
45
products.
46
47
KEYWORDS: caffeic acid, dextransucrase, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, transglucosylation
48
49
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
50
■ INTRODUCTION
51
Polyphenolic compounds are important bioactive substances that are prevalent in plants.
52
Among them, caffeic acid (3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid) is naturally found in various
53
agricultural products such as fruit, vegetables, and coffee beans.1 It is widely present in
54
higher plants in the free form, as well as in the form of glycosides, and esters.2 It has been
55
well documented that caffeic acid has antioxidant,3,4 peroxy radical scavenging,5 and anti-
56
mutagenic properties,6 as well as neuroprotective effects.7 In addition, caffeic acid also
57
exerts an anti-proliferative activity against various types of cancer cells, such as those of
58
cervical, lung, or colon cancer.8 Owing to various beneficial effects of caffeic acid, it has
59
been used in functional foods or as pharmaceutical ingredients. However, such applications
60
are limited by the low water solubility and instability of caffeic acid.
61
To solve this problem, the enzymatic glycosylation of phenolic acids by enzymes such as
62
glucansucrase has generated a considerable interest, because this modification improves the
63
substance solubility, increases chemical stability, and modifies physiological effects of
64
polyphenolic compounds.9–13 Usually, dextransucrase catalyzes synthesis of dextran from
65
sucrose by transglucosylation,14 but it can also catalyze a transfer of a glucose unit to other
66
carbohydrates, or phenolic compounds via glycosidic linkages in an acceptor reaction.15
67
These enzymatic acceptor reactions were used to modify various bioactive compounds to
68
improve their physical and functional properties.9–13
With sucrose and dextransucrase
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 35
Page 5 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
69
from L. mesenteroides B-512FMCM, acarbose and salicin were glycosylated to alleviate
70
consequences of diabetes and reduce blood coagulation, respectively.9,12 Recently,
71
epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and quercetin glucosides synthesized using the L.
72
mesenteroides B-1299CB BF563 dextransucrase were shown to be stable to UV radiation
73
and to have, respectively, 12- or 100-fold higher water solubility values than quercetin or
74
EGCG themselves.12,13 Furthermore, the hydroquinone glucoside, synthesized using L.
75
mesenteroides dextransucrase, had a higher antioxidant activity and higher inhibitory effect
76
on lipid peroxidation than hydroquinone itself and, therefore, it could be suitably used as a
77
potential skin-whitening agent in cosmetic.11
78
In this study, caffeic acid glucoside was synthesized from sucrose and caffeic acid, using L.
79
mesenteroides B-512FMCM dextransucrase. The synthetic caffeic acid glucoside was further
80
purified by butanol partitioning and using silica gel chromatography, or by preparative high-
81
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Its structure was confirmed by nuclear
82
magnetic resonance (NMR) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight
83
mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). In addition, the optimal production conditions for this
84
caffeic acid glucoside were identified by the response surface methodology (RSM).
85
Furthermore, the physico-chemical and functional properties of this caffeic acid glucoside
86
were characterized with respect to its water solubility, resistance to browning, antioxidant
87
activity, and inhibitory effect on lipid peroxidation. These experiments are important steps to 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
88
further studies investigating chemical modifications of caffeic acid and functional
89
applications of obtained derivatives, because until recently, there have been few report about
90
the synthesis and activity of this class chemical compounds.16
91
92
■ MATERIALS AND METHODS
93
Materials. Caffeic acid, deuterium oxide, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), α-
94
tocopherol, and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were
95
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum, penicillin,
96
streptomycin, and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium were purchased from GIBCO BRL
97
(Grand Island, NY, USA). Silica gel beads (40–60 μm) were obtained from Acros Organics
98
(Geel, Belgium). Other chemical substances were used chemically pure grade.
99
Enzyme Preparation and Enzymatic Activity. Dextransucrase (EC 3.2.1.11) was
100
obtained from L. mesenteroides B‐512FMCM grown on the LM medium containing 2%
101
(w/v) glucose as previously described.13 Enzyme activity was measured at 28 °C with 100
102
mM sucrose in a 20 mM sodium-acetate buffer (pH 5.2) for different reaction periods. 17 The
103
reaction aliquots were placed on thin layer chromatography (TLC) silica gel 60 plates (Merck,
104
Darmstadt, Germany) and developed twice, using the following solvent system: acetonitrile:
105
water (85:15, v/v). The carbohydrates were visualized on the TLC plate by dipping into
106
0.03% (w/v) N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine and 5% (v/v) H2SO4 in methanol, followed by 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 35
Page 7 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
107
heating at 120 °C for 10 min.18 The released fructose content from sucrose was measured
108
using the NIH densitometry Image Program (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image) with a
109
standard compound. One unit (U) of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that
110
caused the release of 1 µmol of fructose per min at 28 °C in a 20 mM sodium-acetate buffer
111
(pH 5.2).
112
Synthesis, Purification, and Structural Elucidation of Caffeic Acid Glucoside. The
113
reaction mixture (1 L) for the acceptor reaction comprising 325 mM caffeic acid, 355 mM
114
sucrose, and B-512FMCM dextransucrase (650 U) was incubated in a 20 mM sodium-acetate
115
buffer (pH 5.2) at 28 °C for 6 h and boiled for 10 min to stop the reaction. Reaction mixtures
116
were placed on TLC plates and developed twice, using the following solvent systems:
117
nitromethane: 1-propanol: water (4:10:3, v/v/v) or ethyl acetate: acetic acid: water (3:1:1,
118
v/v/v) with caffeic acid, fructose, and sucrose as standard materials.
119
The reaction mixtures were separated by 50% (v/v) butanol fractionation, as described for
120
the case of hydroquinone glucoside previously.11 The sample was placed on top of silica gel
121
column (4.0 × 75 cm) and caffeic acid glucoside was eluted by a 85% (v/v) solution of
122
acetonitrile in water. The yields and purity of the obtained caffeic acid glucoside were
123
determined by HPLC (LC-10AD; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), using the following instruments
124
and conditions: TSK-GEL, amide-80 column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA); 80% (v/v)
125
acetonitrile solvent system; 1 mL min-1 flow rate; RID-10A RI detector (Shimadzu, Tokyo, 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
126
Japan). Purified caffeic acid glucoside (5 mg mL-1) was mixed with 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic
127
acid (1 mg mL-1), loaded on stainless steel plate, and dried at 25 °C. The molecular mass of
128
the sample was determined by MALDI-TOF (Voyager DE-STR, Applied Biosystems, Poster,
129
CA, USA) in the linear way with delayed extraction (75 laser shots) and acceleration voltage
130
at 65 kV.
131
Approximately 10 mg of purified caffeic acid glucoside was dissolved in DMSO-d6 (250
132
µL) and placed into 3-mm NMR tubes. NMR spectra were acquired on an Avance-500
133
instrument (Bruker, Pleasanton, CA, USA) at the National Center for Inter-University
134
Research Facilities (Kanwak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea) running at 500 MHz and 125 MHz for
135
1
136
determined by the homo nuclear correlation spectroscopy (COSY), hetero nuclear single
137
quantum coherence (HSQC), and hetero nuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC)
138
analyses.12
H and
13
C, respectively. The glucosidic linkage between caffeic acid and glucoside was
139
Optimization of Caffeic Acid Glucoside Production by the Response Surface
140
Methodology. The condition of the caffeic acid glucoside production was optimized using a
141
Box-Behnken design with three independent variables, sucrose concentration, enzyme
142
activity, and caffeic acid concentration. The synthesis of caffeic acid glucoside was optimized
143
by the RSM and presented using a second-order polynomial equation as follows:19 y=β0+
144
β1x1+β2x2+β3x3+β11x12+β22x22+β33x32+β12x1x2+β13x1x3+β23x2x3. Statistical analyses of the 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 35
Page 9 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
145
experimental design and data were performed using Design Expert 8.0.1 software (SAS
146
Institute Inc.; Cary, NC, USA). The design included 20 cultivation conditions with six
147
replicates at the central point. Here, the coefficient of determination (R2) or adjusted R2
148
represented the fitness of the polynomial model equation. From a preliminary experiment, the
149
following ranges for the three factors were selected to optimize the caffeic acid glucoside
150
synthesis: L. mesenteroides dextransucrase, 30–1,238 mU; sucrose concentration, 10–700
151
mM; caffeic acid concentration, 150–619 mM (Supplemental Table S1).
152
Water Solubility and Browning Resistance of Caffeic Acid Glucoside. Excess
153
amounts of caffeic acid or caffeic acid glucoside were mixed with 200 µL of water in an
154
Eppendorf tube at room temperature. After a 1-h sonication at room temperature, each sample
155
was diluted and then filtered through a 0.45 µm MFS membrane and the extent of water
156
solubility was quantified by HPLC.20 Browning resistance was evaluated in 0.25% (w/v)
157
water solutions of caffeic acid or caffeic acid glucoside. The sample solutions were exposed
158
to 10-W irradiation at wavelength of 254 nm for 24 h at room temperature. Changes in
159
absorbance at 460 nm were determined using a UV spectrophotometer.20
160
Antioxidant Activity.
Antioxidant activity of caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside
161
was detected using the stable radical DPPH.21 Samples containing 0.01–2.0 mM solutions of
162
caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside in ethanol were reacted with a 100 µM DPPH solution
163
and monitored at 517 nm using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
164
USA). Ascorbic acid was used as a reference compound. Radical scavenging activity was
165
expressed as the percentage of inhibition of DPPH radical concentration. IC50 designated the
166
concentration of the compound at which the level of the free radical DPPH was reduced by
167
50%.
168
Anti-lipid Peroxidation Activity.
Inhibition of lipid peroxidation was determined
169
using the High-Performance Chemiluminescent Analyzer (Tohoku Electronic Industrial,
170
Tokyo, Japan) and an ARAL kit (ABCD GmbH, Berlin, Germany). According to total ion
171
chromatogram (TIC) detection method, the antioxidant preparations of caffeic acid or caffeic
172
acid glucoside were mixed with sample free radical-attached luminol. When antioxidant
173
species in a sample were consumed, delayed photons were generated. The lag time was
174
positively related to the antioxidant species content in the samples. Samples of caffeic acid or
175
caffeic acid glucoside (50–500 µM), or vitamin E (10–100 µM) were mixed with the reaction
176
buffer at 37 °C and levels of their antioxidant effect were then determined.22
177
Growth Inhibition of Human Colon Cancer Cell (HT29).
HT29 human colon cancer
178
cells, from a colonic adenocarcinoma of a female Caucasian, were purchased from the
179
American Tissue Culture Collection (HTB-38™, Rockville, MD, USA). The cells were
180
maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island,
181
NY, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 U mL-1
182
penicillin, and 0.1 mg mL-1streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 35
Page 11 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
183
at 37 °C. Inhibition of cell growth was assessed by MTT assay according to Murad et al.23
184
Briefly, cells were plated onto a 96-well plate at a density of 2 × 104/well in 100 µL of
185
medium. After 24 h, they were treated with a series of caffeic acid and its glucoside
186
concentrations (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10 mM) for 48 h. After treatment,
187
medium containing caffeic acid and its glucoside were carefully removed, and 100 µL MTT
188
solution (0.25 mg/mL in phosphate-buffered saline) was added to each well. After 4 h of
189
incubation at 37℃, MTT was discarded and 200 µL of extraction buffer (90% dimethyl
190
sulfoxide, 10% 100 mM glycine-NaOH, pH 10.0) were added to each well, followed by
191
shaking for 30 min. Absorbance (A) at 570 nm was measured using a microplate reader.
192
Percent cell viability was calculated as follows: cell viability (%) = (absorbance of the sample
193
tested/absorbance of the medium only) × 100. Each experiment was repeated three times. The
194
concentration of caffeic acid or its glucoside compound at which 50% of the cells survived
195
(IC50) was also determined.
196
197
■ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
198
Synthesis and Purification of Caffeic Acid Glucoside. After caffeic acid was reacted
199
with sucrose in an acceptor reaction in the presence of L. mesenteroides B-512FMCM
200
dextransucrase, a single reaction product, caffeic acid glucoside, was detected by TLC
201
analysis (Figure 1). Caffeic acid glucoside was produced from the solution containing 500 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
202
mM caffeic acid, 300 mM sucrose, and 1 U mL-1 dextransucrase. The resulting concentration
203
of caffeic acid glucoside was 131.4 mM, indicating conversion yield of 26.3% based on the
204
input amount of caffeic acid. The reaction mixtures were separated by butanol partitioning,
205
which removed unreacted or hydrolyzed carbohydrates or enzymes into the lower layer,
206
whereas caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside were concentrated in the upper layer (data not
207
shown). Furthermore, caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside were eluted using an 85% (v/v)
208
solution of acetonitrile in water by silica gel column chromatography. Reaction schematic
209
diagram and HPLC chromatogram of caffeic acid glucoside showed purification profile of
210
caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside (Figure 1B). The total yield of caffeic acid glucoside,
211
which appeared as a brownish-yellow powder, comprised 15.3 g.
212
Structural Elucidation of Caffeic Acid Glucoside. The number of glucose units attached
213
to the synthesized compound was verified by MALDI-TOF MS analysis. The molecular
214
weight of caffeic acid was increased by one glucose moiety. The NMR data (1H, 13C, COSY,
215
HSQC, and HMBC) of caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside are shown in Table 1 and
216
Supplemental Figure S1. The molecular mass of caffeic acid glucoside was observed at m/z
217
at 365 (M + Na)+. In Table 1, a doublet signal at 5.23 ppm (J=3.5 Hz) was assigned to the
218
anomeric proton, indicating that one glucosyl residue was α-linked to caffeic acid. According
219
to these results, the structure of caffeic acid glucoside was confirmed as caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-
220
glucopyranoside (Figure 2). 12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 35
Page 13 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
221
There were some shifts of carbon signals at 130.90 ppm to C-1, 117.04 ppm to C-5, 118.91
222
ppm to C-6, 137.75 ppm to C-1', 125.41 ppm to C-2', and 170.54 ppm to C-3'. By the
223
difference of solvent, 1H and 13C data were slightly shifted compared with those reported by
224
Lim et al.25 According to the HMBC data, the anomeric carbon of glucopyranoside was
225
attached to the C-3 hydroxyl group of caffeic acid. The C-1'' of the glucosyl residue was
226
detected at 100.18 ppm according to this HSQC data.
227
Optimum Synthesis of Caffeic Acid-3-O-α-D-Glucopyranoside. Experimental design
228
and corresponding RSM responses are presented in Table 2, Supplemental Figure S2. The
229
caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside synthesis was investigated using sucrose concentration
230
(x1), dextransucrase activity (x2), and caffeic acid concentration (x3) as variables. The central
231
composite design for the caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside synthesis was ascertained for
232
the following values of the three factors: sucrose, 355 mM; dextransucrase activity, 650 mU
233
mL-1; caffeic acid, 325 mM. Values of “Prob > F” 1 mM caffeic acid and significant loss of viability was evident after 48 h of
325
treatment.8
326
In summary, in this study, we synthesized caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside, using
327
sucrose and dextransucrase from L. mesenteroides B-512FMCM. We made several important
328
observations with regard to this product. First, the use of dextransucrase allowed a relatively
329
high yield (~50%) of the glycosylated derivative, compared to the yields (6~16%) obtained
330
with other enzymes such as sucrose phosphorylase or glucosyltransferase.2,25 Second, by our
331
method, we obtained a single product, caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside, whereas the
332
use of other enzymes led to production of two or three caffeic acid glucosides. Third, caffeic
333
acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside possessed beneficial physical properties such as higher water
334
solubility and higher resistance to browning. Lastly, caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside 18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 35
Page 19 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
335
showed antioxidant activity similar to that of caffeic acid, whereas its inhibitory effects on
336
lipid peroxidation and HT-29 colon cancer cells growth were stronger. Thus, caffeic acid
337
glucoside could be used as a novel functional ingredient in food or cosmetics. Further
338
possibilities of the synthesis of caffeic acid derivatives with two or three attached glucoside
339
group, using dextransucrase, are currently being explored in our laboratories to confirm the
340
relationship between the number of attached glucoside moieties to the caffeic acid and
341
physical stability of corresponding derivatives.
342
343
■ ASSOICATED CONTENT
344
Supporting Information
345
This supporting information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
346
Additional experimental data (Table S1–S2 and Figure S1–S3)
347
348
■ AUTHOR INFORMATIONS
349
Corresponding Authors
350
* (Seung-Hee Nam) E-mail: namsh1000@ hanmail.net/
[email protected] 351
* (Doman Kim) E-mail: kimdm@ snu.ac.kr
352
Author contributions
353
†
These authors contributed equally to this work. 19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
354
355
■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
356
This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research
357
Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A1B03936148),
358
Republic of Korea. In addition, this study was supported in part by the Basic Science
359
Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the
360
Ministry of Education (NRF-2015R1D1A1A01056929 to D. Kim and Project No. 2010–
361
0020141).
362
363
■ ABBREVIATIONS USED
364
EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; NMR,
365
nuclear magnetic resonance; MALDI-TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization
366
time-of-flight mass spectrometry; RSM, response surface methodology; COSY, homo nuclear
367
correlation spectroscopy; HSQC, hetero nuclear single quantum coherence; HMBC, hetero
368
nuclear multiple bond correlation; DPPH, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, MTT, 3-(4,5-
369
dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; TIC, total ion chromatogram.
370
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 35
Page 21 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
371
■ REFERENCES
372
(1) Bel-Rhlid, R.; Thapa, D.; Kraehenbuehl, K.; Hansen, C. E.; Fischer, L. Biotransformation
373
of caffeoyl quinic acids from green coffee extracts by Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533.
374
AMB Express. 2013, 3, 1–7
375
(2) Shin, M. H.; Cheong, N. Y.; Lee, J. H.; Kim, K. H. Transglucosylation of caffeic acid by
376
a recombinant sucrose phosphorylase in aqueous buffer and aqueous-supercritical CO2
377
media. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 1028–1033.
378
(3) Masuda, T.; Yamada, K.; Akiyama, J.; Someya, T.; Odaka, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Tori, M.;
379
Nakashima, K.; Maekawa, T.; Sone, Y. Antioxidation mechanism studies of caffeic acid:
380
identification of antioxidation products of methyl caffeate from lipid oxidation. J. Agric.
381
Food Chem. 2008, 56, 5947–5952.
382
383
(4) Marinova, M. E.; Toneva, A.; Yanishlieva N. Comparison of the antioxidative properties of caffeic and chlorogenic acids. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 1498–1502.
384
(5) Kulkarni, R.R.; Lee, W.; Jang, T. S.; Lee, J.; Kwak, S.; Park, M. S.; Lee, M.; Bae, J.; Na,
385
M. Caffeoyl glucosides from Nandina domestica inhibit LPS-induced endothelial
386
inflammatory responses. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 5367–5371.
387
(6) Chang, W. C.; Hsieh, S. C.; Hsiao, M. W.; Lin, W. C.; Hung, Y. C.; Ye, J. C. Caffeic acid
388
induces apoptosis in human cervical cancer cell through the mitochondrial pathway.
389
Taiwan J Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 49, 419–424. 21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 22 of 35
390
(7) Zhang, L.; Zhang, W. P.; Chen, K. D.; Qian, X. D.; Fang, S. H.; Wei, E. Q. Caffeic acid
391
attenuates neuronal damage, astrogliosis and glial scar formation in mouse brain with
392
cryoinjury. Life Science. 2007, 80, 530–537.
393
(8) Bouzaiene, N. N.; Jaziri, S. K.; Kovacic, H.; Chekir-Ghedira, L.; Ghedira, K.; Luis, J. The
394
effects of caffeic, coumaric and ferulic acids on proliferation, superoxide production,
395
adhesion and migration of human tumor cells in vitro. European J. Pharm. 2015, 766,
396
99–105.
397
(9) Yoon, S. H.; Robyt, J. F. Synthesis of acarbose analogues by transglycosylation reactions
398
of Leuconostoc mesenteroides B-512FMC and B-742CB dextransucrases. Carbohydr.
399
Res. 2002, 24, 2427–2435.
400
(10) Seo, E. S.; Lee, J. H.; Park, J. Y.; Kim, D.; Han, H. J.; Robyt, J. F. Enzymatic synthesis
401
and anti-coagulant effect of salicin analogs by using the Leuconostoc mesenteroides
402
glucansucrase acceptor reaction. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 117, 31–38.
403
(11) Seo, E. S.; Kang, J.; Lee, J. H.; Kin, G. E.; Kim, G. J.; Kim, D. Synthesis and
404
characterization
405
dextransucrase. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2009, 45, 355–360.
of
hydroquinone
glucoside
using
Leuconostoc
mesenteroides
406
(12) Moon, Y. H.; Lee, J. H.; Ahn, J. S.; Nam, S. H.; Oh, D. K.; Park, D. H.; Chung, H. J.;
407
Kang, S.; Day, D. F.; Kim D. Synthesis, structure analyses, and characterization of novel
408
epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) glycosides using the glucansucrase from Leuconostoc 22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 35
409
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
mesenteroides B-1299CB. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 1230–1237.
410
(13) Moon, Y. H.; Lee, J. H.; John, D. Y.; Jun, W. J.; Kang, S. S.; Sim, J.; Choi, H.; Moon, J.
411
H.; Kim, D. Synthesis and characterization of novel quercetin-α-D-glucopyranosides
412
using glucansucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007,
413
40, 1124–1129.
414
415
(14) Robyt, J. F.; Yoon, H. S.; Mukerjea, R. Dextransucrase and the mechanism for dextran biosynthesis. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343, 3039–3048.
416
(15) Iliev, I.; Vassileva, T.; Ignatova, C.; Ivanova, I.; Haertle, T.; Monsan, P.; Chobert, J. M.
417
Gluco-oligosaccharides synthesized by glucosyltransferases from constitutive mutants of
418
Leuconostoc mesenteroides strain Lm 28. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 243–250.
419
(16) Desmet, T.; Soetaert, W.; Bojarova, P.; Kren, V.; Dijkhuizen, L.; Eastwich-Field, V.;
420
Schiller, A. Enzymatic glycosylation of small molecules: challenging substrates require
421
tailored catalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 10786–10801.
422
(17) Cho, S. K.; Eom, H.J; Moon, J. S.; Lim, S. B.; Kim, Y. K.; Lee, K. W.; Han, N.S. An
423
improved process of isomaltooligosaccharide production in kimchi involving the
424
addition of a Leuconostoc starter and sugars. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 170, 61–64.
425
(18) Kim, J.; Nguyen, T. T.; Kim, N. M.; Moon, Y. H.; Ha, J. M.; Park, N.; Lee, D. G.;
426
Hwang, K. H.; Park, J. S.; Kim, D. Functional properties of novel epigallocatechin
427
gallate glucosides synthesized by using dextransucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides 23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
428
B-1299CB4. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 9203–9213.
429
(19) Kim, G. E.; Lee, J. H.; Jung, S. H.; Seo, E. S.; Jin, S. D.; Kim, G. J.; Cha, J. C.; Kim, E.
430
J.; Park, K. D. Enzymatic synthesis and characterization of hydroquinone galactoside
431
using Kluyveromyces lactis lactase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 9492–9497.
432
(20) Woo, H. J.; Kang, H. K.; Nguyen, T.H.H.; Kim, G.E.; Kim, Y. M.; Park, J. S.; Kim, D.;
433
Cha, J.; Moon, Y. H.; Nam, S. H.; Xia, Y. M.; Kimura, A.; Kim, D. Synthesis and
434
characterization of ampelopsin glucosides using dextransucrase from Leuconostoc
435
mesenteroides B-1299CB4: Glucosylation enhancing physicochemical properties.
436
Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2012, 51, 311–318.
437
(21) Abe, N.; Nemoto, A.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Hojo, H.; Hirota, A. Studies of the 1,1-diphenyl-2-
438
picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging mechanism for a 2-pyrone compound. Biosci.
439
Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 306–333.
440
(22) Popov, I.; Lewin, G. Photochemiluminescent detection of antiradical activity. VII.
441
Comparison with a modified method of thermo-initiated free radical generation with
442
chemiluminescent detection. Luminescence. 2005, 20, 321–325.
443
(23) Murad, L. D.; Soares, N. C.; Brand, C.; Monteiro, M. C.;, Teodoro, A. J. Effects of
444
caffeic and 5-caffeoylquinic acids on cell viability and cellular uptake in human colon
445
adenocarcinoma cells. Nutr Cancer. 2015, 67, 532–542.
446
(24) Nishimura, T.; Kometani, T.; Takii, H.; Terada, Y.; Okada, S. Glucosylation of caffeic 24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 35
Page 25 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
447
acid with Bacillus subtilis X-23 α-amylase and a description of the glucosides. J.
448
Ferment. Bioeng. 1995, 80, 18–23.
449
(25) Lim, E. K.; Higgins, G. S.; Li, Y.; Bowles, D. J. Regioselectivity of glucosylation of
450
caffeic acid by a UDP-glucose: glucosyltransferase is maintained in planta. Biochem. J.
451
2003, 373, 987–992.
452
(26) Kang, J.; Kim, Y. M.; Kim, N.; Kim, D. W.; Nam, S. H.; Kim, D. Synthesis and
453
characterization
454
levansucrase. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 83, 1009–1016.
455
456
of
hydroquinone
fructoside
using
Leuconostoc
mesenteroides
(27) Muller, F. The nature and mechanism of superoxide production by the electron transport chain: its relevance to aging. J. Am. Aging Assoc. 2000, 23, 227–253.
25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 26 of 35
Table 1. NMR analysis of caffeic acid and caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside Carbon position
Caffeic acid (δ)
Caffeic acid glucoside (δ1)
δC
δ1C
δH
(δ1-δ)
δH
Caffeic acid 1
125.69
130.90
(5.21)
2
114.64
114.22
(-0.42)
3
145.55
145.95
(0.4)
4
148.13
147.63
(-0.5)
5
115.74
6.76 (1H, d, J=8 Hz)
117.04
(1.3)
7.15 (1H, d, J=8.5 Hz)
6
121.15
6.97 (1H, dd, J=2, 8 Hz)
118.91
(-2.24)
6.89 (1H, d, J=8.5 Hz)
1'
144.60
7.42 (1H, d, J=16 Hz)
137.75
(-6.85)
7.13 (1H, d, J=16 Hz)
2'
115.10
6.17 (1H, d, J=16 Hz)
125.41
(10.31)
6.26 (1H, d, J=16 Hz)
3'
167.91
170.54
(2.63)
7.03 (1H, d, J=2 Hz)
6.98 (1H, s)
Glucose 1'' 2''
100.18 72.11
5.23 (1H, d, J=3.5 Hz) 3.32 (1H, m)
3''
72.77
3.76 (1H, m)
4''
69.79
3.19 (1H, m)
5''
74.00
3.50 (1H, m)
6''
60.70
3.61 (1H, m)
26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 2. Central composite design matrix for the experimental design and predicted responses for caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside synthesis caffeic acid-3-O-α-Dglucopyranoside synthesis
Coded levels Run no.
(mM) X1
X2
X3
Actual
Predicted
1
150
300
150
38.9
9.72
2
560
300
150
36.5
26.6
3
150
1000
150
134.7
113.8
4
560
1000
150
109.4
101.8
5
150
300
500
79.0
58.7
6
560
300
500
66.2
59.2
7
150
1000
500
131.4
113.4
8
560
1000
500
83.8
85.1
9
10.2
650
325
66.6
105.7
10
699.8
650
325
95.8
96.1
11
355
61.4
325
4.4
30.5
12
355
1238.6
325
126.5
139.8
13
355
650
30.7
0.8
27.5
14
355
650
619.3
41.8
54.5
15
355
650
325
164.9
151.9
16
355
650
325
148.4
151.9
17
355
650
325
156.5
151.9
18
355
650
325
147.1
151.9
19
355
650
325
157.0
151.9
20
355
650
325
144.3
151.9
Y = −268.1 + 0.39X1 + 0.44X2 + 1.05X3 – 0.00043X12− 0.00019X22− 0.0013X32 − 0.0001X1X2 − 0.00011X1X3 − 0.0002X2X3.
27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 28 of 35
Table 3. Water solubility and browning resistance of caffeic acid and caffeic acid-3-O-α-Dglucopyranoside Sample
a
Solubility in water (µM)
Relative browning (%)
Caffeic acid
6.5 + 0.05a
100 + 0.012a
Caffeic acid-3-O-α-Dglucopyranoside
20.5 + 0.12a
8.72 + 0.019a
Mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
457
28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 35
458
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure Legends
459
460
Figure 1. Analysis of the transglucosylation product by thin layer chromatography (A) and
461
high pressure liquid chromatography (B).
462
(A) Lane 1: sucrose; lane 2: fructose; lane 3: glucose; lane 4: enzyme; lane 5: standard caffeic
463
acid; lane 6: dextransucrase reaction digest. (B) Reaction schematic diagram and HPLC
464
chromatogram of caffeic acid glucoside performed with the TSK-GEL amide-80 column
465
(acetonitrile/water = 80:20 (v/v); flow rate, 1.0 mL min-1; room temperature) after butanol
466
separation and silica gel column chromatography. R: reaction mixture of caffeic acid and
467
dextransucrase; P1: purified caffeic acid glucoside; P2: caffeic acid.
468
469
Figure 2. HMBC correlation of caffeic acid glucoside between caffeic acid structures.
470
471
Figure 3. 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging activity (A), inhibition
472
of lipid peroxidation (B) and growth inhibition of HT-29 colon cancer cells (C) by caffeic
473
acid and caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside.
474
(A) Caffeic acid or caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside in concentrations 0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1,
475
0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, or 2.0 mM was mixed with a 100 µM DPPH in darkness at room
476
temperature for 10 min, and then the absorbance was monitored at 517 nm. Data are reported 29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
477
as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
478
(B) Inhibition of lipid peroxidation was determined using the High-Performance
479
Chemiluminescent Analyzer (Tohoku Electronic Industrial, Tokyo, Japan) and ARAL kit
480
(ABCD GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Inhibition of lipid peroxidation by α-tocopherol (10, 25,
481
50, and 100 µM) was performed to produce the control set of data for comparisons. The
482
inhibitory effects of 50, 100, and 500 µM solutions of caffeic acid and caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-
483
glucopyranoside on lipid peroxidation were then determined.
484
(C) Growth inhibition of HT29 colon cancer cells by MTT assay. HT29 cell (2 × 104 per
485
well) was treated with a series of caffeic acid and caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside
486
concentration (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10 or 20 mM) for 48 h. Data are means
487
± SD of six independent experiments.
30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 35
Page 31 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(A)
Fig. 1A. Nam et al.,
31
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(B)
Fig. 1B. Nam et al.,
32
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 32 of 35
Page 33 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
OH HO
A
B
HO
O
HO
HO
HO
O
HO
O
O
HO
HO
Fig. 2. Nam et al.,
33
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(A)
(B)
(C)
Fig. 3. Nam et al., 34
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 34 of 35
Page 35 of 35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Caffeic Acid Glycosylation Caffeic acid + Sucrose, Dextransucrase (L. mesenteroides)
Purification (HPLC), Identification (NMR), & Optimzation (RSM) Caffeic acid Caffeic acid glucoside
Caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside
Physical & Functional characterization ACS Paragon Plus Environment