Synthesis and Functional Characterization of Caffeic Acid Glucoside

Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Sciences, Utah State University, 8700 Old Main Hill, 750N 1200E, Logan, Utah 84322-8700, United States...
0 downloads 0 Views 892KB Size
Subscriber access provided by Fudan University

Article

Synthesis and Functional Characterization of Caffeic Acid Glucoside Using Leuconostoc mesenteroides Dextransucrase Seung-Hee Nam, Young-Min Kim, Marie K Walsh, Young-Jung Wee, Kwang-Yeol Yang, Jin-A Ko, Songhee Han, Thi Thanh Hanh Nguyen, Ji Young Kim, and Doman Kim J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00344 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Mar 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 9, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Synthesis and Functional Characterization of Caffeic Acid Glucoside Using

2

Leuconostoc mesenteroides Dextransucrase

3

4

Seung-Hee Nam,a,†,* Young-Min Kim,b, f, † Marie K. Walsh,c Young-Jung Wee,d Kwang-Yeol

5

Yang,e Jin-A Ko,f Songhee Han,g Thi Thanh Hanh Nguyen,h Ji Young Kim,g and Doman

6

Kimg, h, *

7

8

a

9

10

South Korea. b

11

12

c

d

Department of Food Science and Technology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongbuk 38541, South Korea

e

17

18

Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Sciences, Utah State University, 8700 Old Main Hill, 750N 1200E, 84322-8700, Logan, UT, USA.

15

16

Department of Food Science & Technology and BK21 Plus Program, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, South Korea.

13

14

Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186,

Department of Plant Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186, South Korea.

f

Bio-energy Research Center, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, South Korea

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

19

g

20

21

Department of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, Gangwon do 25354, South Korea

h

22

Institute of Food Industrialization, Institutes of Green Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University, Gangwon-do 25354, South Korea

23 24 25



26

*

27

Seung-Hee Nam, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Chonnam National University,

28

Gwangju 61186, South Korea. TEL: +82-62-530-0620; Fax: +82-62-530-2149, E-mail: namsh1000@

29

hanmail.net.

30

Doman Kim, Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University,

31

Gangwon-do 25354, South Korea. TEL & Fax: +82-633-339-5736; E-mail: kimdm@ snu.ac.kr

These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to:

32

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 35

Page 3 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

33

ABSTRACT: Caffeic acid was modified via transglucosylation, using sucrose and

34

dextransucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides B‐512FMCM. Following enzymatic

35

modification, a caffeic acid glucoside was isolated by butanol separation, silica gel

36

chromatography, and preparative HPLC. The synthesized caffeic acid glucoside had a

37

molecular mass-to-charge ratio of 365 m/z and its structure was identified as caffeic acid-3-O-

38

α-D-glucopyranoside. The production of this caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside at a

39

concentration of 153 mM was optimized using 325 mM caffeic acid, 355 mM sucrose, and

40

650mU mL-1 dextransucrase in the synthesis reaction. In comparison with the caffeic acid, the

41

caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside displayed 3-fold higher water solubility, 1.66-fold

42

higher anti-lipid peroxidation effect, 15% stronger inhibition of colon cancer cell growth and

43

11.5-fold higher browning resistance. These results indicate that this caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-

44

glucopyranoside may be a suitable functional component of food and pharmaceutical

45

products.

46

47

KEYWORDS: caffeic acid, dextransucrase, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, transglucosylation

48

49

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

50

■ INTRODUCTION

51

Polyphenolic compounds are important bioactive substances that are prevalent in plants.

52

Among them, caffeic acid (3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid) is naturally found in various

53

agricultural products such as fruit, vegetables, and coffee beans.1 It is widely present in

54

higher plants in the free form, as well as in the form of glycosides, and esters.2 It has been

55

well documented that caffeic acid has antioxidant,3,4 peroxy radical scavenging,5 and anti-

56

mutagenic properties,6 as well as neuroprotective effects.7 In addition, caffeic acid also

57

exerts an anti-proliferative activity against various types of cancer cells, such as those of

58

cervical, lung, or colon cancer.8 Owing to various beneficial effects of caffeic acid, it has

59

been used in functional foods or as pharmaceutical ingredients. However, such applications

60

are limited by the low water solubility and instability of caffeic acid.

61

To solve this problem, the enzymatic glycosylation of phenolic acids by enzymes such as

62

glucansucrase has generated a considerable interest, because this modification improves the

63

substance solubility, increases chemical stability, and modifies physiological effects of

64

polyphenolic compounds.9–13 Usually, dextransucrase catalyzes synthesis of dextran from

65

sucrose by transglucosylation,14 but it can also catalyze a transfer of a glucose unit to other

66

carbohydrates, or phenolic compounds via glycosidic linkages in an acceptor reaction.15

67

These enzymatic acceptor reactions were used to modify various bioactive compounds to

68

improve their physical and functional properties.9–13

With sucrose and dextransucrase

4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 35

Page 5 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

69

from L. mesenteroides B-512FMCM, acarbose and salicin were glycosylated to alleviate

70

consequences of diabetes and reduce blood coagulation, respectively.9,12 Recently,

71

epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and quercetin glucosides synthesized using the L.

72

mesenteroides B-1299CB BF563 dextransucrase were shown to be stable to UV radiation

73

and to have, respectively, 12- or 100-fold higher water solubility values than quercetin or

74

EGCG themselves.12,13 Furthermore, the hydroquinone glucoside, synthesized using L.

75

mesenteroides dextransucrase, had a higher antioxidant activity and higher inhibitory effect

76

on lipid peroxidation than hydroquinone itself and, therefore, it could be suitably used as a

77

potential skin-whitening agent in cosmetic.11

78

In this study, caffeic acid glucoside was synthesized from sucrose and caffeic acid, using L.

79

mesenteroides B-512FMCM dextransucrase. The synthetic caffeic acid glucoside was further

80

purified by butanol partitioning and using silica gel chromatography, or by preparative high-

81

performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Its structure was confirmed by nuclear

82

magnetic resonance (NMR) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight

83

mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). In addition, the optimal production conditions for this

84

caffeic acid glucoside were identified by the response surface methodology (RSM).

85

Furthermore, the physico-chemical and functional properties of this caffeic acid glucoside

86

were characterized with respect to its water solubility, resistance to browning, antioxidant

87

activity, and inhibitory effect on lipid peroxidation. These experiments are important steps to 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

88

further studies investigating chemical modifications of caffeic acid and functional

89

applications of obtained derivatives, because until recently, there have been few report about

90

the synthesis and activity of this class chemical compounds.16

91

92

■ MATERIALS AND METHODS

93

Materials. Caffeic acid, deuterium oxide, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), α-

94

tocopherol, and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were

95

purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum, penicillin,

96

streptomycin, and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium were purchased from GIBCO BRL

97

(Grand Island, NY, USA). Silica gel beads (40–60 μm) were obtained from Acros Organics

98

(Geel, Belgium). Other chemical substances were used chemically pure grade.

99

Enzyme Preparation and Enzymatic Activity. Dextransucrase (EC 3.2.1.11) was

100

obtained from L. mesenteroides B‐512FMCM grown on the LM medium containing 2%

101

(w/v) glucose as previously described.13 Enzyme activity was measured at 28 °C with 100

102

mM sucrose in a 20 mM sodium-acetate buffer (pH 5.2) for different reaction periods. 17 The

103

reaction aliquots were placed on thin layer chromatography (TLC) silica gel 60 plates (Merck,

104

Darmstadt, Germany) and developed twice, using the following solvent system: acetonitrile:

105

water (85:15, v/v). The carbohydrates were visualized on the TLC plate by dipping into

106

0.03% (w/v) N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine and 5% (v/v) H2SO4 in methanol, followed by 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 35

Page 7 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

107

heating at 120 °C for 10 min.18 The released fructose content from sucrose was measured

108

using the NIH densitometry Image Program (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image) with a

109

standard compound. One unit (U) of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that

110

caused the release of 1 µmol of fructose per min at 28 °C in a 20 mM sodium-acetate buffer

111

(pH 5.2).

112

Synthesis, Purification, and Structural Elucidation of Caffeic Acid Glucoside. The

113

reaction mixture (1 L) for the acceptor reaction comprising 325 mM caffeic acid, 355 mM

114

sucrose, and B-512FMCM dextransucrase (650 U) was incubated in a 20 mM sodium-acetate

115

buffer (pH 5.2) at 28 °C for 6 h and boiled for 10 min to stop the reaction. Reaction mixtures

116

were placed on TLC plates and developed twice, using the following solvent systems:

117

nitromethane: 1-propanol: water (4:10:3, v/v/v) or ethyl acetate: acetic acid: water (3:1:1,

118

v/v/v) with caffeic acid, fructose, and sucrose as standard materials.

119

The reaction mixtures were separated by 50% (v/v) butanol fractionation, as described for

120

the case of hydroquinone glucoside previously.11 The sample was placed on top of silica gel

121

column (4.0 × 75 cm) and caffeic acid glucoside was eluted by a 85% (v/v) solution of

122

acetonitrile in water. The yields and purity of the obtained caffeic acid glucoside were

123

determined by HPLC (LC-10AD; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), using the following instruments

124

and conditions: TSK-GEL, amide-80 column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA); 80% (v/v)

125

acetonitrile solvent system; 1 mL min-1 flow rate; RID-10A RI detector (Shimadzu, Tokyo, 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

126

Japan). Purified caffeic acid glucoside (5 mg mL-1) was mixed with 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic

127

acid (1 mg mL-1), loaded on stainless steel plate, and dried at 25 °C. The molecular mass of

128

the sample was determined by MALDI-TOF (Voyager DE-STR, Applied Biosystems, Poster,

129

CA, USA) in the linear way with delayed extraction (75 laser shots) and acceleration voltage

130

at 65 kV.

131

Approximately 10 mg of purified caffeic acid glucoside was dissolved in DMSO-d6 (250

132

µL) and placed into 3-mm NMR tubes. NMR spectra were acquired on an Avance-500

133

instrument (Bruker, Pleasanton, CA, USA) at the National Center for Inter-University

134

Research Facilities (Kanwak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea) running at 500 MHz and 125 MHz for

135

1

136

determined by the homo nuclear correlation spectroscopy (COSY), hetero nuclear single

137

quantum coherence (HSQC), and hetero nuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC)

138

analyses.12

H and

13

C, respectively. The glucosidic linkage between caffeic acid and glucoside was

139

Optimization of Caffeic Acid Glucoside Production by the Response Surface

140

Methodology. The condition of the caffeic acid glucoside production was optimized using a

141

Box-Behnken design with three independent variables, sucrose concentration, enzyme

142

activity, and caffeic acid concentration. The synthesis of caffeic acid glucoside was optimized

143

by the RSM and presented using a second-order polynomial equation as follows:19 y=β0+

144

β1x1+β2x2+β3x3+β11x12+β22x22+β33x32+β12x1x2+β13x1x3+β23x2x3. Statistical analyses of the 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 35

Page 9 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

145

experimental design and data were performed using Design Expert 8.0.1 software (SAS

146

Institute Inc.; Cary, NC, USA). The design included 20 cultivation conditions with six

147

replicates at the central point. Here, the coefficient of determination (R2) or adjusted R2

148

represented the fitness of the polynomial model equation. From a preliminary experiment, the

149

following ranges for the three factors were selected to optimize the caffeic acid glucoside

150

synthesis: L. mesenteroides dextransucrase, 30–1,238 mU; sucrose concentration, 10–700

151

mM; caffeic acid concentration, 150–619 mM (Supplemental Table S1).

152

Water Solubility and Browning Resistance of Caffeic Acid Glucoside. Excess

153

amounts of caffeic acid or caffeic acid glucoside were mixed with 200 µL of water in an

154

Eppendorf tube at room temperature. After a 1-h sonication at room temperature, each sample

155

was diluted and then filtered through a 0.45 µm MFS membrane and the extent of water

156

solubility was quantified by HPLC.20 Browning resistance was evaluated in 0.25% (w/v)

157

water solutions of caffeic acid or caffeic acid glucoside. The sample solutions were exposed

158

to 10-W irradiation at wavelength of 254 nm for 24 h at room temperature. Changes in

159

absorbance at 460 nm were determined using a UV spectrophotometer.20

160

Antioxidant Activity.

Antioxidant activity of caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside

161

was detected using the stable radical DPPH.21 Samples containing 0.01–2.0 mM solutions of

162

caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside in ethanol were reacted with a 100 µM DPPH solution

163

and monitored at 517 nm using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, 9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

164

USA). Ascorbic acid was used as a reference compound. Radical scavenging activity was

165

expressed as the percentage of inhibition of DPPH radical concentration. IC50 designated the

166

concentration of the compound at which the level of the free radical DPPH was reduced by

167

50%.

168

Anti-lipid Peroxidation Activity.

Inhibition of lipid peroxidation was determined

169

using the High-Performance Chemiluminescent Analyzer (Tohoku Electronic Industrial,

170

Tokyo, Japan) and an ARAL kit (ABCD GmbH, Berlin, Germany). According to total ion

171

chromatogram (TIC) detection method, the antioxidant preparations of caffeic acid or caffeic

172

acid glucoside were mixed with sample free radical-attached luminol. When antioxidant

173

species in a sample were consumed, delayed photons were generated. The lag time was

174

positively related to the antioxidant species content in the samples. Samples of caffeic acid or

175

caffeic acid glucoside (50–500 µM), or vitamin E (10–100 µM) were mixed with the reaction

176

buffer at 37 °C and levels of their antioxidant effect were then determined.22

177

Growth Inhibition of Human Colon Cancer Cell (HT29).

HT29 human colon cancer

178

cells, from a colonic adenocarcinoma of a female Caucasian, were purchased from the

179

American Tissue Culture Collection (HTB-38™, Rockville, MD, USA). The cells were

180

maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island,

181

NY, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 U mL-1

182

penicillin, and 0.1 mg mL-1streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 10

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 35

Page 11 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

183

at 37 °C. Inhibition of cell growth was assessed by MTT assay according to Murad et al.23

184

Briefly, cells were plated onto a 96-well plate at a density of 2 × 104/well in 100 µL of

185

medium. After 24 h, they were treated with a series of caffeic acid and its glucoside

186

concentrations (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10 mM) for 48 h. After treatment,

187

medium containing caffeic acid and its glucoside were carefully removed, and 100 µL MTT

188

solution (0.25 mg/mL in phosphate-buffered saline) was added to each well. After 4 h of

189

incubation at 37℃, MTT was discarded and 200 µL of extraction buffer (90% dimethyl

190

sulfoxide, 10% 100 mM glycine-NaOH, pH 10.0) were added to each well, followed by

191

shaking for 30 min. Absorbance (A) at 570 nm was measured using a microplate reader.

192

Percent cell viability was calculated as follows: cell viability (%) = (absorbance of the sample

193

tested/absorbance of the medium only) × 100. Each experiment was repeated three times. The

194

concentration of caffeic acid or its glucoside compound at which 50% of the cells survived

195

(IC50) was also determined.

196

197

■ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

198

Synthesis and Purification of Caffeic Acid Glucoside. After caffeic acid was reacted

199

with sucrose in an acceptor reaction in the presence of L. mesenteroides B-512FMCM

200

dextransucrase, a single reaction product, caffeic acid glucoside, was detected by TLC

201

analysis (Figure 1). Caffeic acid glucoside was produced from the solution containing 500 11

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

202

mM caffeic acid, 300 mM sucrose, and 1 U mL-1 dextransucrase. The resulting concentration

203

of caffeic acid glucoside was 131.4 mM, indicating conversion yield of 26.3% based on the

204

input amount of caffeic acid. The reaction mixtures were separated by butanol partitioning,

205

which removed unreacted or hydrolyzed carbohydrates or enzymes into the lower layer,

206

whereas caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside were concentrated in the upper layer (data not

207

shown). Furthermore, caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside were eluted using an 85% (v/v)

208

solution of acetonitrile in water by silica gel column chromatography. Reaction schematic

209

diagram and HPLC chromatogram of caffeic acid glucoside showed purification profile of

210

caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside (Figure 1B). The total yield of caffeic acid glucoside,

211

which appeared as a brownish-yellow powder, comprised 15.3 g.

212

Structural Elucidation of Caffeic Acid Glucoside. The number of glucose units attached

213

to the synthesized compound was verified by MALDI-TOF MS analysis. The molecular

214

weight of caffeic acid was increased by one glucose moiety. The NMR data (1H, 13C, COSY,

215

HSQC, and HMBC) of caffeic acid and caffeic acid glucoside are shown in Table 1 and

216

Supplemental Figure S1. The molecular mass of caffeic acid glucoside was observed at m/z

217

at 365 (M + Na)+. In Table 1, a doublet signal at 5.23 ppm (J=3.5 Hz) was assigned to the

218

anomeric proton, indicating that one glucosyl residue was α-linked to caffeic acid. According

219

to these results, the structure of caffeic acid glucoside was confirmed as caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-

220

glucopyranoside (Figure 2). 12

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 35

Page 13 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

221

There were some shifts of carbon signals at 130.90 ppm to C-1, 117.04 ppm to C-5, 118.91

222

ppm to C-6, 137.75 ppm to C-1', 125.41 ppm to C-2', and 170.54 ppm to C-3'. By the

223

difference of solvent, 1H and 13C data were slightly shifted compared with those reported by

224

Lim et al.25 According to the HMBC data, the anomeric carbon of glucopyranoside was

225

attached to the C-3 hydroxyl group of caffeic acid. The C-1'' of the glucosyl residue was

226

detected at 100.18 ppm according to this HSQC data.

227

Optimum Synthesis of Caffeic Acid-3-O-α-D-Glucopyranoside. Experimental design

228

and corresponding RSM responses are presented in Table 2, Supplemental Figure S2. The

229

caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside synthesis was investigated using sucrose concentration

230

(x1), dextransucrase activity (x2), and caffeic acid concentration (x3) as variables. The central

231

composite design for the caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside synthesis was ascertained for

232

the following values of the three factors: sucrose, 355 mM; dextransucrase activity, 650 mU

233

mL-1; caffeic acid, 325 mM. Values of “Prob > F” 1 mM caffeic acid and significant loss of viability was evident after 48 h of

325

treatment.8

326

In summary, in this study, we synthesized caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside, using

327

sucrose and dextransucrase from L. mesenteroides B-512FMCM. We made several important

328

observations with regard to this product. First, the use of dextransucrase allowed a relatively

329

high yield (~50%) of the glycosylated derivative, compared to the yields (6~16%) obtained

330

with other enzymes such as sucrose phosphorylase or glucosyltransferase.2,25 Second, by our

331

method, we obtained a single product, caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside, whereas the

332

use of other enzymes led to production of two or three caffeic acid glucosides. Third, caffeic

333

acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside possessed beneficial physical properties such as higher water

334

solubility and higher resistance to browning. Lastly, caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside 18

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 35

Page 19 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

335

showed antioxidant activity similar to that of caffeic acid, whereas its inhibitory effects on

336

lipid peroxidation and HT-29 colon cancer cells growth were stronger. Thus, caffeic acid

337

glucoside could be used as a novel functional ingredient in food or cosmetics. Further

338

possibilities of the synthesis of caffeic acid derivatives with two or three attached glucoside

339

group, using dextransucrase, are currently being explored in our laboratories to confirm the

340

relationship between the number of attached glucoside moieties to the caffeic acid and

341

physical stability of corresponding derivatives.

342

343

■ ASSOICATED CONTENT

344

Supporting Information

345

This supporting information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

346

Additional experimental data (Table S1–S2 and Figure S1–S3)

347

348

■ AUTHOR INFORMATIONS

349

Corresponding Authors

350

* (Seung-Hee Nam) E-mail: namsh1000@ hanmail.net/ [email protected]

351

* (Doman Kim) E-mail: kimdm@ snu.ac.kr

352

Author contributions

353



These authors contributed equally to this work. 19

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

354

355

■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

356

This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research

357

Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A1B03936148),

358

Republic of Korea. In addition, this study was supported in part by the Basic Science

359

Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the

360

Ministry of Education (NRF-2015R1D1A1A01056929 to D. Kim and Project No. 2010–

361

0020141).

362

363

■ ABBREVIATIONS USED

364

EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; NMR,

365

nuclear magnetic resonance; MALDI-TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization

366

time-of-flight mass spectrometry; RSM, response surface methodology; COSY, homo nuclear

367

correlation spectroscopy; HSQC, hetero nuclear single quantum coherence; HMBC, hetero

368

nuclear multiple bond correlation; DPPH, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, MTT, 3-(4,5-

369

dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; TIC, total ion chromatogram.

370

20

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 35

Page 21 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

371

■ REFERENCES

372

(1) Bel-Rhlid, R.; Thapa, D.; Kraehenbuehl, K.; Hansen, C. E.; Fischer, L. Biotransformation

373

of caffeoyl quinic acids from green coffee extracts by Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533.

374

AMB Express. 2013, 3, 1–7

375

(2) Shin, M. H.; Cheong, N. Y.; Lee, J. H.; Kim, K. H. Transglucosylation of caffeic acid by

376

a recombinant sucrose phosphorylase in aqueous buffer and aqueous-supercritical CO2

377

media. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 1028–1033.

378

(3) Masuda, T.; Yamada, K.; Akiyama, J.; Someya, T.; Odaka, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Tori, M.;

379

Nakashima, K.; Maekawa, T.; Sone, Y. Antioxidation mechanism studies of caffeic acid:

380

identification of antioxidation products of methyl caffeate from lipid oxidation. J. Agric.

381

Food Chem. 2008, 56, 5947–5952.

382

383

(4) Marinova, M. E.; Toneva, A.; Yanishlieva N. Comparison of the antioxidative properties of caffeic and chlorogenic acids. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 1498–1502.

384

(5) Kulkarni, R.R.; Lee, W.; Jang, T. S.; Lee, J.; Kwak, S.; Park, M. S.; Lee, M.; Bae, J.; Na,

385

M. Caffeoyl glucosides from Nandina domestica inhibit LPS-induced endothelial

386

inflammatory responses. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 5367–5371.

387

(6) Chang, W. C.; Hsieh, S. C.; Hsiao, M. W.; Lin, W. C.; Hung, Y. C.; Ye, J. C. Caffeic acid

388

induces apoptosis in human cervical cancer cell through the mitochondrial pathway.

389

Taiwan J Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 49, 419–424. 21

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 22 of 35

390

(7) Zhang, L.; Zhang, W. P.; Chen, K. D.; Qian, X. D.; Fang, S. H.; Wei, E. Q. Caffeic acid

391

attenuates neuronal damage, astrogliosis and glial scar formation in mouse brain with

392

cryoinjury. Life Science. 2007, 80, 530–537.

393

(8) Bouzaiene, N. N.; Jaziri, S. K.; Kovacic, H.; Chekir-Ghedira, L.; Ghedira, K.; Luis, J. The

394

effects of caffeic, coumaric and ferulic acids on proliferation, superoxide production,

395

adhesion and migration of human tumor cells in vitro. European J. Pharm. 2015, 766,

396

99–105.

397

(9) Yoon, S. H.; Robyt, J. F. Synthesis of acarbose analogues by transglycosylation reactions

398

of Leuconostoc mesenteroides B-512FMC and B-742CB dextransucrases. Carbohydr.

399

Res. 2002, 24, 2427–2435.

400

(10) Seo, E. S.; Lee, J. H.; Park, J. Y.; Kim, D.; Han, H. J.; Robyt, J. F. Enzymatic synthesis

401

and anti-coagulant effect of salicin analogs by using the Leuconostoc mesenteroides

402

glucansucrase acceptor reaction. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 117, 31–38.

403

(11) Seo, E. S.; Kang, J.; Lee, J. H.; Kin, G. E.; Kim, G. J.; Kim, D. Synthesis and

404

characterization

405

dextransucrase. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2009, 45, 355–360.

of

hydroquinone

glucoside

using

Leuconostoc

mesenteroides

406

(12) Moon, Y. H.; Lee, J. H.; Ahn, J. S.; Nam, S. H.; Oh, D. K.; Park, D. H.; Chung, H. J.;

407

Kang, S.; Day, D. F.; Kim D. Synthesis, structure analyses, and characterization of novel

408

epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) glycosides using the glucansucrase from Leuconostoc 22

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 23 of 35

409

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

mesenteroides B-1299CB. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 1230–1237.

410

(13) Moon, Y. H.; Lee, J. H.; John, D. Y.; Jun, W. J.; Kang, S. S.; Sim, J.; Choi, H.; Moon, J.

411

H.; Kim, D. Synthesis and characterization of novel quercetin-α-D-glucopyranosides

412

using glucansucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007,

413

40, 1124–1129.

414

415

(14) Robyt, J. F.; Yoon, H. S.; Mukerjea, R. Dextransucrase and the mechanism for dextran biosynthesis. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343, 3039–3048.

416

(15) Iliev, I.; Vassileva, T.; Ignatova, C.; Ivanova, I.; Haertle, T.; Monsan, P.; Chobert, J. M.

417

Gluco-oligosaccharides synthesized by glucosyltransferases from constitutive mutants of

418

Leuconostoc mesenteroides strain Lm 28. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 243–250.

419

(16) Desmet, T.; Soetaert, W.; Bojarova, P.; Kren, V.; Dijkhuizen, L.; Eastwich-Field, V.;

420

Schiller, A. Enzymatic glycosylation of small molecules: challenging substrates require

421

tailored catalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 10786–10801.

422

(17) Cho, S. K.; Eom, H.J; Moon, J. S.; Lim, S. B.; Kim, Y. K.; Lee, K. W.; Han, N.S. An

423

improved process of isomaltooligosaccharide production in kimchi involving the

424

addition of a Leuconostoc starter and sugars. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 170, 61–64.

425

(18) Kim, J.; Nguyen, T. T.; Kim, N. M.; Moon, Y. H.; Ha, J. M.; Park, N.; Lee, D. G.;

426

Hwang, K. H.; Park, J. S.; Kim, D. Functional properties of novel epigallocatechin

427

gallate glucosides synthesized by using dextransucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides 23

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

428

B-1299CB4. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 9203–9213.

429

(19) Kim, G. E.; Lee, J. H.; Jung, S. H.; Seo, E. S.; Jin, S. D.; Kim, G. J.; Cha, J. C.; Kim, E.

430

J.; Park, K. D. Enzymatic synthesis and characterization of hydroquinone galactoside

431

using Kluyveromyces lactis lactase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 9492–9497.

432

(20) Woo, H. J.; Kang, H. K.; Nguyen, T.H.H.; Kim, G.E.; Kim, Y. M.; Park, J. S.; Kim, D.;

433

Cha, J.; Moon, Y. H.; Nam, S. H.; Xia, Y. M.; Kimura, A.; Kim, D. Synthesis and

434

characterization of ampelopsin glucosides using dextransucrase from Leuconostoc

435

mesenteroides B-1299CB4: Glucosylation enhancing physicochemical properties.

436

Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2012, 51, 311–318.

437

(21) Abe, N.; Nemoto, A.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Hojo, H.; Hirota, A. Studies of the 1,1-diphenyl-2-

438

picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging mechanism for a 2-pyrone compound. Biosci.

439

Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 306–333.

440

(22) Popov, I.; Lewin, G. Photochemiluminescent detection of antiradical activity. VII.

441

Comparison with a modified method of thermo-initiated free radical generation with

442

chemiluminescent detection. Luminescence. 2005, 20, 321–325.

443

(23) Murad, L. D.; Soares, N. C.; Brand, C.; Monteiro, M. C.;, Teodoro, A. J. Effects of

444

caffeic and 5-caffeoylquinic acids on cell viability and cellular uptake in human colon

445

adenocarcinoma cells. Nutr Cancer. 2015, 67, 532–542.

446

(24) Nishimura, T.; Kometani, T.; Takii, H.; Terada, Y.; Okada, S. Glucosylation of caffeic 24

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 24 of 35

Page 25 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

447

acid with Bacillus subtilis X-23 α-amylase and a description of the glucosides. J.

448

Ferment. Bioeng. 1995, 80, 18–23.

449

(25) Lim, E. K.; Higgins, G. S.; Li, Y.; Bowles, D. J. Regioselectivity of glucosylation of

450

caffeic acid by a UDP-glucose: glucosyltransferase is maintained in planta. Biochem. J.

451

2003, 373, 987–992.

452

(26) Kang, J.; Kim, Y. M.; Kim, N.; Kim, D. W.; Nam, S. H.; Kim, D. Synthesis and

453

characterization

454

levansucrase. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 83, 1009–1016.

455

456

of

hydroquinone

fructoside

using

Leuconostoc

mesenteroides

(27) Muller, F. The nature and mechanism of superoxide production by the electron transport chain: its relevance to aging. J. Am. Aging Assoc. 2000, 23, 227–253.

25

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 26 of 35

Table 1. NMR analysis of caffeic acid and caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside Carbon position

Caffeic acid (δ)

Caffeic acid glucoside (δ1)

δC

δ1C

δH

(δ1-δ)

δH

Caffeic acid 1

125.69

130.90

(5.21)

2

114.64

114.22

(-0.42)

3

145.55

145.95

(0.4)

4

148.13

147.63

(-0.5)

5

115.74

6.76 (1H, d, J=8 Hz)

117.04

(1.3)

7.15 (1H, d, J=8.5 Hz)

6

121.15

6.97 (1H, dd, J=2, 8 Hz)

118.91

(-2.24)

6.89 (1H, d, J=8.5 Hz)

1'

144.60

7.42 (1H, d, J=16 Hz)

137.75

(-6.85)

7.13 (1H, d, J=16 Hz)

2'

115.10

6.17 (1H, d, J=16 Hz)

125.41

(10.31)

6.26 (1H, d, J=16 Hz)

3'

167.91

170.54

(2.63)

7.03 (1H, d, J=2 Hz)

6.98 (1H, s)

Glucose 1'' 2''

100.18 72.11

5.23 (1H, d, J=3.5 Hz) 3.32 (1H, m)

3''

72.77

3.76 (1H, m)

4''

69.79

3.19 (1H, m)

5''

74.00

3.50 (1H, m)

6''

60.70

3.61 (1H, m)

26

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Table 2. Central composite design matrix for the experimental design and predicted responses for caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside synthesis caffeic acid-3-O-α-Dglucopyranoside synthesis

Coded levels Run no.

(mM) X1

X2

X3

Actual

Predicted

1

150

300

150

38.9

9.72

2

560

300

150

36.5

26.6

3

150

1000

150

134.7

113.8

4

560

1000

150

109.4

101.8

5

150

300

500

79.0

58.7

6

560

300

500

66.2

59.2

7

150

1000

500

131.4

113.4

8

560

1000

500

83.8

85.1

9

10.2

650

325

66.6

105.7

10

699.8

650

325

95.8

96.1

11

355

61.4

325

4.4

30.5

12

355

1238.6

325

126.5

139.8

13

355

650

30.7

0.8

27.5

14

355

650

619.3

41.8

54.5

15

355

650

325

164.9

151.9

16

355

650

325

148.4

151.9

17

355

650

325

156.5

151.9

18

355

650

325

147.1

151.9

19

355

650

325

157.0

151.9

20

355

650

325

144.3

151.9

Y = −268.1 + 0.39X1 + 0.44X2 + 1.05X3 – 0.00043X12− 0.00019X22− 0.0013X32 − 0.0001X1X2 − 0.00011X1X3 − 0.0002X2X3.

27

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 28 of 35

Table 3. Water solubility and browning resistance of caffeic acid and caffeic acid-3-O-α-Dglucopyranoside Sample

a

Solubility in water (µM)

Relative browning (%)

Caffeic acid

6.5 + 0.05a

100 + 0.012a

Caffeic acid-3-O-α-Dglucopyranoside

20.5 + 0.12a

8.72 + 0.019a

Mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).

457

28

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 29 of 35

458

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure Legends

459

460

Figure 1. Analysis of the transglucosylation product by thin layer chromatography (A) and

461

high pressure liquid chromatography (B).

462

(A) Lane 1: sucrose; lane 2: fructose; lane 3: glucose; lane 4: enzyme; lane 5: standard caffeic

463

acid; lane 6: dextransucrase reaction digest. (B) Reaction schematic diagram and HPLC

464

chromatogram of caffeic acid glucoside performed with the TSK-GEL amide-80 column

465

(acetonitrile/water = 80:20 (v/v); flow rate, 1.0 mL min-1; room temperature) after butanol

466

separation and silica gel column chromatography. R: reaction mixture of caffeic acid and

467

dextransucrase; P1: purified caffeic acid glucoside; P2: caffeic acid.

468

469

Figure 2. HMBC correlation of caffeic acid glucoside between caffeic acid structures.

470

471

Figure 3. 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging activity (A), inhibition

472

of lipid peroxidation (B) and growth inhibition of HT-29 colon cancer cells (C) by caffeic

473

acid and caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside.

474

(A) Caffeic acid or caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside in concentrations 0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1,

475

0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, or 2.0 mM was mixed with a 100 µM DPPH in darkness at room

476

temperature for 10 min, and then the absorbance was monitored at 517 nm. Data are reported 29

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

477

as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments.

478

(B) Inhibition of lipid peroxidation was determined using the High-Performance

479

Chemiluminescent Analyzer (Tohoku Electronic Industrial, Tokyo, Japan) and ARAL kit

480

(ABCD GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Inhibition of lipid peroxidation by α-tocopherol (10, 25,

481

50, and 100 µM) was performed to produce the control set of data for comparisons. The

482

inhibitory effects of 50, 100, and 500 µM solutions of caffeic acid and caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-

483

glucopyranoside on lipid peroxidation were then determined.

484

(C) Growth inhibition of HT29 colon cancer cells by MTT assay. HT29 cell (2 × 104 per

485

well) was treated with a series of caffeic acid and caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside

486

concentration (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10 or 20 mM) for 48 h. Data are means

487

± SD of six independent experiments.

30

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 30 of 35

Page 31 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(A)

Fig. 1A. Nam et al.,

31

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(B)

Fig. 1B. Nam et al.,

32

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 32 of 35

Page 33 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

OH HO

A

B

HO

O

HO

HO

HO

O

HO

O

O

HO

HO

Fig. 2. Nam et al.,

33

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(A)

(B)

(C)

Fig. 3. Nam et al., 34

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 34 of 35

Page 35 of 35

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Caffeic Acid Glycosylation Caffeic acid + Sucrose, Dextransucrase (L. mesenteroides)

Purification (HPLC), Identification (NMR), & Optimzation (RSM) Caffeic acid Caffeic acid glucoside

Caffeic acid-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside

Physical & Functional characterization ACS Paragon Plus Environment