The binding of resveratrol to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF

Dec 10, 2018 - In human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), compared with ... reduced the VEGF-triggered VEGF receptor-2 phosphorylation and JN...
0 downloads 0 Views 966KB Size
Subscriber access provided by YORK UNIV

Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions

The binding of resveratrol to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) suppresses angiogenesis by inhibiting the receptor signalling WEIHUI HU, Ray R. Duan, Yiteng Xia, Qingping Xiong, Huaiyou WANG, Gallant Kar-Lun Chan, Siyue Liu, Tina T.X. Dong, Qiwei Qin, and Karl W.K. Tsim J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05977 • Publication Date (Web): 10 Dec 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 14, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 47

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

The binding of resveratrol to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)

2

suppresses angiogenesis by inhibiting the receptor signalling

3

Wei-Hui Hua,b , Ran Duana,b, Yi-Teng Xia a,b, Qing-Ping Xiongb,c, Huai-You Wanga,b, Gallant Kar-

4

Lun Chana,b, Si-Yue Liub,#, Tina Ting-Xia Donga,b,d, Qi-Wei Qind, Karl Wah-Keung Tsim*,a,b,d

5

aShenzhen

6

Institute, Hi-Tech Park, Nanshan, Shenzhen, China

7

bDivision

8

and Technology, Clear Water Bay Road, Hong Kong, China

9

cJiangsu

Key Laboratory of Edible and Medicinal Bioresources, HKUST Shenzhen Research

of Life Science and Center for Chinese Medicine, The Hong Kong University of Science

Key Laboratory of Regional Resource Exploitation and Medicinal Research, Huaiyin

10

Institute of Technology, Jiangsu, China

11

dJoint

12

Conservation and Exploitation, College of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University,

13

Guangzhou 510642, PR China

Laboratory of Guangdong Province and Hong Kong Region on Marine Bioresource

14 15

*Corresponding Author: Prof. Karl W. K. Tsim, Division of Life Science, Center for Chinese

16

Medicine, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay Road, Hong

17

Kong, China Tel: +852- 2358 7332; fax: +852- 2358 1559; E-mail address: [email protected].

18

# Present address: Saint Edward's School, Vero Beach, FL 32963, USA

19

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

20

Abbreviations: HUVECs, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; VEGF, vascular endothelial

21

growth factor; VEGFR1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1; VEGFR2, vascular

22

endothelial growth factor receptor 2; VEGFR3, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3; JNK,

23

c-Jun N-terminal kinase; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; Akt, protein kinase B; Erk,

24

extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; MTT, 3-

25

(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; DCFH-DA, 2’7’-Dichlorofluorescein

26

diacetate

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 47

Page 3 of 47

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

28

Abstract:

29

Resveratrol is a polyphenol commonly found in plants and food health products, such as grape and

30

red wine; this was identified for its binding to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by using a

31

HerboChips screening: the binding, therefore, resulted in alterations of VEGF binding to its receptor

32

as well as pharmaceutical roles of VEGF in angiogenesis. Several lines of evidence gave support to

33

the inhibitory activities of resveratrol in VEGF-triggered angiogenesis. In human umbilical vein

34

endothelial cells (HUVECs), compared with VEGF-induced group, resveratrol, at a high

35

concentration, suppressed VEGF-mediated endothelial cell proliferation, cell migration, cell invasion

36

and tube formation by 80 ± 9.01%, 140 ± 3.78%, 110 ± 7.51% and 120 ± 10.26%, separately.

37

Moreover, resveratrol inhibited the sub-intestinal vessel formation in zebrafish embryo. In signalling

38

cascades, application of resveratrol in HUVECs reduced the VEGF-triggered VEGF receptor-2

39

phosphorylation and JNK phosphorylation. Moreover, the VEGF-mediated phosphorylations of

40

eNOS, Akt and Erk were obviously decreased by 3 ± 0.37 folds, 2 ± 0.27 folds and 6 ± 0.23 folds,

41

separately, in the present of resveratrol at high concentration. Parallelly, the VEGF-induced ROS

42

formation was significantly decreased by 50 ± 7.88% to 120 ± 14.82% under resveratrol treatment.

43

Thus, our results provided support to anti-angiogenic roles of resveratrol, as well as its related

44

signalling mechanisms, in attenuating the VEGF-mediated responses. The present results supported

45

possible development of resveratrol that should be considered as a therapeutic agent in terms of

46

prevention and clinical treatment of diseases related with angiogenesis.

47 48

Keywords: Herbal medicine, resveratrol, angiogenesis, VEGF, VEGFR2

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

50

Introduction

51

Angiogenesis is a highly regulated process, during which the formation of new blood vessels is taken,

52

based on pre-existing vessels. Intricate and highly regulated angiogenesis plays a significant role in

53

wound healing, embryogenesis and formation of corpus luteum.1, 2 Angiogenesis can be divided into

54

several responses that are temporally regulated, including endothelial proliferation, migration and

55

differentiation, and protease induction. Synchronization of these complex events and coordination of

56

this complicated procedure of angiogenesis are controlled by a series of activators and inhibitors, e.g.

57

growth factors and cytokines, secreted by endothelial cells, matrix cells and tumour cells.3 Activation

58

of different receptors by numerous ligands, including the placental growth factor (PlGF), acidic and

59

basic fibroblast growth factors (aFGF and bFGF), angiopoietins (mostly Ang-1 and -2), platelet-

60

derived growth factor (PDGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and platelet derived-endothelial cell

61

growth factor (PD-ECGF) are required

62

number of growth factors exerting effects on angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor

63

(VEGF) is the most significant signal protein that contributes to increase the survival and mitogenic

64

capability of vascular endothelial cells.9

65

The specific pharmaceutical effects of VEGF on endothelial cells are primarily mediated by reacting

66

with two types of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

67

(VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2). Despite VEGF could be engaged with the two receptors, VEGFR-2 plays

68

a major role in regulating most of biological functions of VEGF, including endothelial cell

69

mitogenesis and cell permeability, thus triggering the pre-existing endothelial cell survival, cell

70

proliferation, cell migration, as well as new tube formation.10-12 After VEGFR-2 activation, the

71

phosphorylations of multiple downstream molecules, including ERK, JNK, PI3K, AKT, P70S6K and

4-8

for a proper angiogenic process. In spite of an increasing

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 47

Page 5 of 47

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

72

p38MAPK, are subsequently activated contributing to proliferation, migration, and tube formation of

73

endothelial cells.13

74

Angiogenesis without control is closely related with diseases, including diabetes, solid tumors,

75

rheumatoid atherosclerosis and arthritis. Particularly, the natural growth and metastasis of tumours

76

have been shown to reply on tumour angiogenesis. Therefore, inhibitors on angiogenesis have been

77

expected to be useful and meaningful in clinical treatment for those diseases correlated with

78

angiogenesis, including tumours.14 Several inhibitors exerting effects on angiogenesis targeting at

79

VEGF and its receptor signaling pathways have been qualified a “license” by the FDA (Food and

80

Drug Administration). Bevacizumab (from Genentech), also named as Avastin, is one kind of

81

monoclonal antibodies against human VEGF, which is initially certificated as an inhibitor of VEGF-

82

VEGFR2 pathway.15 Other small molecules, named sunitinib (SU11248, from Pfizer)16 and sorafenib

83

(BAY 43-9006, from Bayer),17 are also reacted as inhibitors for angiogenesis. Thus, the discovery of

84

inhibitors attenuating the VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling pathway has shed a future in developing new

85

drugs for treatment of angiogenesis-related diseases.

86

Resveratrol (3,5,4'-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene) is one of stilbenoids and belongs to phytoalexin

87

category exiting in several plants. One of the major sources of resveratrol is from grapes, blueberries,

88

raspberries, mulberries. The content of resveratrol in red wine is rich, which is presumed to be of

89

much benefits for human health. Resveratrol is also a major constituent in Polygoni Cuspidati

90

Rhizoma et Radix, especially in the root and rhizome of Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb. et Zucc.

91

Polygoni Cuspidati Rhizoma et Radix is a traditional Chinese medicinal herbs, and which has been

92

extensively used in Asia from ancient times for its excellent pharmaceutical activities in anti-oxidant

93

effects, anti-bacterial effects and anti-inflammations.18 According to our previous investigations,

94

Polygoni Cuspidati Rhizoma et Radix was found to exert inhibitory effects on endothelial cell 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

95

migration, cell invasion and tube formation based, as well as to inhibit the formation of neo-vessel in

96

zebra fish embryo19 The recruitment of resveratrol showed a hepatoprotective activity by interrupting

97

signal transduction and expression of proteins related with cell cycle,20 exhibited activities of cancer

98

chemo-prevention21 and possessed pharmaceutical effects of anti-platelet aggregation.22 In this study,

99

we determined the pharmaceutical activities of resveratrol in angiogenesis, based on in vitro and in

100

vivo models. Moreover, the inhibitory roles of resveratrol in angiogenesis were shown to be triggered

101

by binding with VEGF and thereafter to suppress downstream signalling of VEGFR2.

102 103

Materials and Methods

104

Chemicals

105

HPLC grade acetonitrile (ACN) and formic acid were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Deionized

106

water (18 MΩ cm-1) was supplied from a Millipore Milli-Q water system (Milford, MA). Other

107

reagents were of analytical purity. The Grace Prevail C18 HPLC column and trans-resveratrol, a

108

reference compound, was bought from Chengdu Institute of Biology. CAS (Chengdu, China), and its

109

purity was over 98%, detected by HPLC-DAD. A stock solution of resveratrol at 100 mM was freshly

110

prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).

111

Cell cultures

112

HUVECs were obtained from Lonza (San Diego, CA), and the cultures were performed for all cell-

113

based experiments from 3 to 6 passages. HUVECs were cultured in EGM-2® BulletKit media strictly

114

following illustrations (Lonza). Recombinant human VEGF (VEGF165) was obtained from R&D

115

systems (Minneapolis, MN). Inhibitors, including LY294002, U0126 and L-Name, were bought from

116

Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). DCFH-DA was from Sigma-Aldrich. The following antibodies:

117

phospho-eNOS (Ser1177), eNOS, phospho-Akt (Ser473), Akt, phospho-VEGFR2 (Tyr1175)

118

(19A10), VEGFR2 (55B11), phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204), p44/42 MAPK 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 47

Page 7 of 47

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

119

(Erk1/2), phospho-SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) (81E11), SAPK/JNK were purchased from Cell

120

Signalling Technology (Danvers, MA); GAPDH antibody was from Sigma-Aldrich.

121

Analyses of resveratrol by HPLC and HerboChips

122

The extract of Polygoni Cuspidati Rhizoma et Radix (the root and rhizome of P. cuspidatum) was

123

kindly supplied by Yunnan Baiyao Group Tianzihong Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Kunming, Yunnan,

124

China) and further qualified by Yunnan Institute of Materia Medica (Kunming, Yunnan, China)

125

following The Pharmacopoeia Commission of PR China 2015. In brief, 50 g Polygoni Cuspidati

126

Rhizoma et Radix were smashed into powder and successively dissolving in 1,000 mL of 50%

127

ethanol (1:20 w/v) for 72 hours as the extraction. All herbal extracts were dried in a lyophilizer, kept

128

sealed in 4 °C until use.23 For resveratrol identification existing in herbal extract, 50 mg of powder at

129

100 mg and 2 mL of 50% methanol were together added into a 15-mL centrifugal tube. The tube was

130

centrifuged at 1,000 x g for 5 min after sonicated for 15 min. After centrifuge, supernatant was

131

directly used for analysis. A solution of resveratrol, at a concentration of 1,000 mg/L, was made as

132

the stocking solution. An Agilent 1200 HPLC series system, equipped with a degasser, an auto-

133

sampler, a binary pump and a thermos-stated column compartment, was used for the chemical

134

analysis. An Agilent, Grace VisionHT C18 column (4.6 x 250 mm, 5 μm) was used for

135

chromatographic separation. Acetonitrile (as Solvent A) and 0.2% formic acid (as Solvent B) were

136

used as mobile phase. The separation was performed at room temperature, and the flow rate was set at

137

1.0 mL/min. The gradient elution applied here was set at below: Solvent A was gradually increased

138

from 10% to 35% from 0 to 60 min and then increased up to 100% at 96 min. Before sample injection,

139

0.45 μm Millipore syringe filter unit was used to filter herbal extract. Ten μL of filtered herbal extract

140

and the standard solution of resveratrol, at a concentration of 1,000 mg/L, were separately performed

141

the injection for HPLC chromatogram analysis; while the wavelength was set at 280 nm, together

142

with a whole spectral scanning from 190 nm to 400 nm. The content of resveratrol in this herb was 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

143

precisely quantified according to Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Each fraction was related with 1 min. The

144

blank chips went through surfaces activation with the application of epoxy groups before dotted with

145

herbal extract. Then, the previously collected herbal fractions were separately dotted on surface of

146

activated chips in rows with application of an automatic arrayer (Biodot A101, Shuai Ran Precision,

147

Taiwan) and then went through fixation.

148

Screening of HerboChips

149

Dialysis method was used to generate biotinylated protein, as described previously.19 Herbal extracts

150

were reacted with the biotinylated protein probe according to standard screening protocol of

151

HerboChips.19 In brief, biotinylated VEGF, at a weight of 20 ng, was added onto each cave and

152

reacted for 60 min at 4 oC. Then, biotinylated protein unbound with chip was removed from chips

153

rinsed for 4X with application of Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 solution (TBST solution).

154

Streptavidin-Cy5TM (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was selected to hybridize with the

155

chip. The hybridization reaction was taken 1 hour at 4 oC. Streptavidin-Cy5TM was applied to detect

156

biotinylated protein, which was bound with herbal fractions. Lastly, Herbochips were scanned under

157

a fluorophore microarray scanner (GenePix 4100A, Molecular Devices Corp., Sunnyvale, CA) to

158

obtain the fluorescence intensity of streptavidin-Cy5TM. The fluorescence results were further

159

quantified with application of Gene-Pix Pro 7 (ver. 7.1.16) software on a microarray scanner.

160

Molecular docking

161

The crystal structure of protein was obtained from Protein Data Bank (PDB), and the legend

162

molecules, resveratrol (PubChem: 445154) and bevacizumab (PubChem: 24801581) were both

163

obtained from NCBI-PubChem database. The structures of legend molecules were separately

164

transferred into MOL2 mode for molecular docking analysis by using Chemoffice 2014 (Cambridge

165

Soft, Cambridge, MA). The docking calculations were performed on the basis of DockingServer,

166

which was an interface on the basis of websites to cope with all aspects of molecular docking with 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 47

Page 9 of 47

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

167

application of AutoDock tools. Molecular docking calculations were separately performed based on

168

bevacizumab/resveratrol-VEGF protein model. By using AutoGrid program, affinity (grid) maps of

169

40×40×40 Å grid points, corresponded to x, y, and z, and 0.375 Å spacing, were automatically shown,

170

and box center was designed as followed: x: 0.38 Å, y: -2.98 Å and z: 20.51 Å.24 With this grid

171

designed, most of binding modes were generated for the most favourable binding interaction, and

172

energies could be approximately predicted.25 The binding actions were run with the application of the

173

vina software, and the binding results could be shown with PyMOL molecular graphics system.

174

Moreover, the interactions of resveratrol/or its analogues with other growth factors, including EGF,

175

bFGF and PDGF, were analysed following similar auto-docking analysis.

176

Immunoprecipitation assay

177

Immunoprecipitation assay was performed to confirm the binding interaction between resveratrol and

178

VEGF. Briefly, 100 µL 0.5 µM resveratrol solution, with VEGF protein or biotinylated VEGF, was

179

incubated 1 hour at 4 oC. Then, 100 µL of PureProteome Streptavidin Magnetic Beads were added

180

separately into VEGF solution and biotinylated VEGF solution. The interaction reaction was taken

181

for 24 hours at 4 oC. Then, the tubes containing mixtures were placed into magnetic stand, allowing

182

the beads to migrate to the magnet. Then, the solution was carefully removed without disturbing the

183

beads. After three rounds of washing with PBS, acetonitrile (ACN) was applied to precipitate the

184

VEGF/biotin-labelled VEGF complex. The supernatant was subjected to UPLC analysis to determine

185

the amount of resveratrol, based on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA) with

186

an Agilent, Grace VisionHT C18 column (4.6 x 250 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phases used here were

187

determined as followed: A, 0.1% diluted aqueous formic acid; B, 0.1% formic acid in ACN, and the

188

elution of gradient was determined at below: Solvent B was increased from 10% to 35% by 60 min

189

and then increased to 100% by 96 min. The sample and column temperatures were at room

190

temperature and 35 oC. Mass spectrometric detection was performed together with a UPLC and a 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 10 of 47

191

SynaptTM quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) High-Definition Mass Spectrometer (Waters), equipped

192

with an electrospray ionization source operating under positive ionization mode. After optimization,

193

the mass spectrometric parameters were shown as follows: sample cone, 25 V; capillary voltage, 2.5

194

kV; source temperature, 120 oC; extraction cone, 4.0 V; and desolvation temperature was set at 350

195

oC.

196

and 50 L/hour. Argon was here determined as a collision gas. A lock mass of leucine-enkephalin at a

197

concentration of 200 pg/mL in 50% ACN-water solution (including 0.1% formic acid) was employed

198

as an external reference to generate a [M-H]- ion in negative mode at m/z 226.8728 via a lock spray

199

interface with flow rate set at 5 mL/min to acquire accurate mass during the analysis. The sample was

200

scanned in full-scan mode from m/z 80 to 800 in 1 sec scan intervals.

201

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)

202

The binding between resveratrol and VEGF protein was performed on a Biacore S200 (GE Life

203

Sciences) with a GE series dextran-coated (CM5) sensor chip. Briefly, reaction temperature was set at

204

25 oC, and HBS-T (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Hepes, 0.05% polysorbate 20, 3.4 mM EDTA, pH 7.4)

205

was selected as the running buffer. The sensor surface of chip used for capture was prepared by

206

covalently immobilizing VEGF onto the chip surface according to EDC/NHS (1-Ethyl-3-[3-

207

dimethylaminopropyl] carbodiimide hydrochloride)/N-hydroxysuccinimide) coupling chemistry.

208

After surface activation, VEGF protein dissolved in coupling buffer (0.1 M acetate buffer, pH 4.5)

209

was put onto the activated surface of chip, until the detected RU (resonance unit) signal of VEGF

210

protein reached at around 6500 RU. To remove uncoupled protein, the chip with activated coupled

211

surfaces were washed and reacted with 10 mM glycine-HCl of which pH was set at 1.5. Next, a series

212

of concentrations of resveratrol were diluted with running buffer (3-fold dilutions from 100 μM to

213

0.137 μM) and flown through chip surface with VEGF protein coupled. The interaction between

214

VEGF protein and resveratrol was detected in real time. A reference channel with no protein

Nitrogen was selected as a desolvation, and a cone gas was, respectively, set at a flow rate of 600

10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 47

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

215

immobilized was served as a reference control. Data was analysed with the application of GE Biacore

216

S200 control software.

217

Cell viability assay

218

The MTT assay was firstly performed to study the effects of resveratrol on HUVECs. Briefly, 5 × 103

219

endothelial cells in 100 μL of medium were seeded on sterile 96-well plate. After incubation for 24

220

hours, the medium in each well was changed with 100 μL of fresh medium, containing VEGF at 10

221

ng/mL or a series of concentrations of resveratrol. Ten μL/well of MTT solution with concentration

222

set at 5 mg/mL was added after drug treatment for 48 hours. After incubating at 37 oC for another 4

223

hours, 150 μL of 100% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was added into each well to dissolve the

224

formazan salt following medium aspiration. The colour intensity of formazan solution was read under

225

a microplate spectrophotometer and the wavelength was set at 570 nm. The LDH release was detected

226

with application of a cytotoxicity detection kit plus (LDH) (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN).

227

The LDH content of each group was quantified following the below formula: cytotoxicity (%) =

228

(experimental value − low control)/ (high control − low control) × 100.

229

Migration assay

230

A wound-healing assay was used to study cell migration in vitro.19,26 In brief, endothelial cells

231

(HUVECs) were seeded on a sterile 12-well plate with the density set at 20×104/well. After

232

incubation for 24 hours, a straight and single wound, located in the centre of each well, was

233

performed to remove the attached endothelial cells: this wound was created with application of a

234

sterile 200 μL plastic pipette tip. Then, each well was taken photos with application of a phase-

235

contrast microscope (At0) after washed by pre-warmed PBS. Fresh medium containing VEGF, at a

236

concentration of 10 ng/mL or different concentrations of resveratrol was added to certain wells

237

separately, and the wells treated only fresh medium were regarded as a control. After drug treatment

238

for 8 hours, three areas of endothelial cells were decided randomly and taken pictures (At8). With 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 12 of 47

239

application of Tscratch software (CSE lab, Switzerland), the wound area of each well, before and

240

after drug treatments, was measured. The recovery percentage of endothelial cells was calculated on

241

the basis of the following formula: Recovery (%) = At0-At8/At0 × 100%.

242

Cell invasion assay

243

Endothelial cells were seeded on Transwell Boyden Chamber (8-μm pore; Corning Inc., Lowell, MA),

244

in which matrigel was allowed to be polymerizd for 1 hour at 37 oC. Next, 100 μL of cell suspension

245

in serum-free medium were plated on upper compartment with concentration set at 20 x 104 cells/mL.

246

Certain wells contained a series of different concentrations of resveratrol or VEGF, at a concentration

247

of 10 ng/mL. The lower chambers were added with 500 μL fresh medium only. After incubated for

248

24 hours at 37 ˚C with drug, pre-warmed PBS was used to rinse of HUVECs failing to attach and

249

grow; while invasive cells, succeeded into the lower surface, were undergoing dehydration firstly

250

with pre-cold methanol and then stained with crystal violet, at a percentage of 0.01%. After staining,

251

photos of endothelial cells invaded into lower surface were taken with application of a phase-contrast

252

microscope. Images were further analysed by counting of cell number manually. The ratio of invasion

253

was demonstrated as % of the control group.

254

Tube formation assay

255

Tube formation assay was performed based on previous descriptions.19,27 Briefly, Matrigel was used

256

to pre-coat 12-well plate firstly, and matrigel polymerization was lasted for 1 hour at 37 ˚C. After

257

matrigel polymerization, endothelial cells (HUVECs) containing a series of different concentrations

258

of resveratrol or 10 ng/mL VEGF were plated onto each well of plates coated with matrigel with the

259

cell density set at 20×104 cells/well. After incubated for 8 hours at 37 °C with drug, tube-like

260

structures of HUVECs were photographed with a phase-contrast microscope. Images from different

261

drug-treated groups were analysed by counting of the branching points manually, which were located

262

in three fields in each well. The fields were determined randomly. 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 47

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

263

Zebrafish angiogenesis assay

264

To perform angiogenesis-related assay in vivo, wild-type zebrafish model was selected.19 Zebrafishes

265

were fed in a system equipped with flow water and regular aeration, and maintained at a cycle of 10

266

hours: 14 hours of dark/light, while the temperature was set at 28.5 oC. Zebrafish maintenance and

267

experimental conduction were published strictly following the guidelines and requirements of Animal

268

and Plant Care Facility of HKUST. All the experiments performed on animals were given official

269

approval by the Animal Ethics Committee in HKUST. By natural spawning of mating matured fishes,

270

embryos were obtained and gathered. Healthy embryos were chosen and dechlorinated manually.

271

Dechlorinated embryos were assigned to each well of 12-well plate (8-10 embryos per well) and were

272

fed with egg water containing a series of different concentrations of resveratrol and VEGF at 28.5 oC.

273

The embryos, separately fed with egg water or DMSO, served as solvent and vehicle control. After

274

drug treatment for 48 hours, treated embryos were checked with morphological characteristics and

275

eyes for viability. After drug treatment, the embryos were fixed with paraformaldehyde (4%) at 4 oC

276

for at least 20 hours. After fixation, embryos were rinsed separately by PBS with 0.1% Tween 20

277

solution (PBST), 50% methanol and methanol, 5 min each. To dehydrated zebrafish embryos,

278

embryos were maintained in methanol and stored at -20 oC refrigerator for 2 hours. To end the

279

dehydration reaction, embryos were rinsed for 4 times, 5 min each, in PBST solution. For alkaline

280

phosphatase-based vascular staining, embryos were then kept in buffer 9.5T for 15 min at room

281

temperature. Buffer 9.5T was freshly prepared by 1M Tris-9.5, 1M MgCl2, deionized water and 20%

282

Tween 20. Next, all embryos were stained with the application of newly prepared nitro-blue

283

tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate

284

Danvers, MA) under dark. To remove left NBT/BCIP, the stained embryos were rinsed continuously

285

with PBST for 3 times, 5 min each. Finally, photos of stained vessels located in the embryo sub-

286

intestinal were taken with the application of a stereomicroscope (Nikon AZ100), which was equipped

(NBT/BCIP)

13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

(Cell

Signalling

Technology,

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 14 of 47

287

with a digital camera (Olympus DP71). ImageJ software was used to quantify the area and branch of

288

sub-intestinal vessels. The experiment was separately performed three times and the same number of

289

fish embryos was used for each treatment group.

290

Western blot analysis

291

Western blot was performed to measure phosphorylations of eNOS (S1177), VEGFR2 (Tyr1175),

292

p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204), SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) and Akt (S473). Endothelial

293

cells were incubated in medium without serum for 60 min before drug treatment. After drug

294

application, medium was aspirated and cultures were subsequently collected in freshly prepared low-

295

salt lysis buffer (2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 200 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8) and

296

transferred into centrifuge tubes. Next, tubes containing cell lysates were heated at 95 °C for three

297

times, 5 min each, and tubes were vortexed. By electrophoresis, the protein extracts were separated

298

into targeted sizes of protein using 7% or 8% acrylamide gels, and the gels were transferred onto

299

nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes representing different sizes of protein were obtained.

300

Then, the membranes were blocked with application of 5% milk solution, which was freshly made in

301

a Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 solution (TBST), for 60 min at room temperature.

302

After blocking, different primary antibody solutions, targeted different kinds of proteins, were used to

303

immerse membranes at 4 °C. The antibody used was diluted at a ratio of 1:1,000. After primary

304

antibody incubation for 24 hours, TBST solution was used to rinse membranes for 4 times, 5 min

305

each, and then membranes were reacted with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit

306

antibody, which was diluted at a ratio of 1:2,000. After incubated with targeted secondary antibody

307

for 120 min at room temperature, TBST solution was used to rinse membranes for another 4 times, 5

308

min each. ECL (Invitrogen) was selected to visualize the reactive bands, and images of reactive bands

309

were taken by using the Chemidoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA). The band intensities of

310

control group and different groups with drug treatments, run on the same piece of gel and 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 47

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

311

photographed under standardized ECL conditions, were further analysed and compared on the related

312

software, which were taken on the basis of a calibration plot from a parallel gel with one of the

313

samples diluted at different ratios. To quantify the western blot in phosphorylation, the band at 10

314

min from each group was compared with the corresponding control at 0 min.

315

Fluorescence intensity analysis

316

HUVEC cells were seeded on a sterile 12-well plate with cell density set at 20×104/well. After

317

incubation for 24 hours, fresh medium containing biotinylated VEGF, at 10 ng/mL or together with a

318

series of concentrations of resveratrol, was applied onto the cultures. The well, treated only fresh

319

medium, was regarded as a background control. After incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C with drug,

320

Streptavidin-Cy5TM was used to hybridize with the biotinylated VEGF. For 1 hour at 37 oC. After

321

washing, cultures were fixed in cold-ethanol, and photos were taken by a laser confocal fluorescent

322

microscopy. Relevant software was used for image analysis, quantifying the total green fluorescence

323

intensity of photos in each group.

324

Measurement of reactive oxygen species

325

The formation of ROS was measured with 2’7’-Dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA, Sigma).

326

After incubated with a series of concentrations of resveratrol and VEGF (10 ng/mL) for 48 hours at

327

37 oC, endothelial cells were reacted with DCF-DA (100 μM) at 37 oC for 30 min. Then, pre-warmed

328

PBS was used to rinse cells for three times, 5 min each, to remove unreacted DCF-DA. Pictures were

329

taken with the application of a laser confocal fluorescent microscopy. Relevant software was used for

330

image analysis, quantifying the total green fluorescence intensity of photos in each group.

331

Statistics and other assays

332

Statistical analysis was performed by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), following a

333

Bonferroni multiple comparisons test using the SPSS 16.0 software. Data were expressed as the mean

334

± standard error of the mean (SEM) and the statistical significance was set at p