The effects of cleaning treatments on the surface composition of

1 day ago - Removal of organic compounds is a common first step in surface characterisation of inorganic materials. To explore the surface reactivity ...
0 downloads 6 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by TUFTS UNIV

Fossil Fuels

The effects of cleaning treatments on the surface composition of porous materials Stanislav Jelavi#, A.R. Nielsen, M Blazanovic, N. Bovet, K Bechgaard, and Susan Louise Svane Stipp Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03586 • Publication Date (Web): 20 Mar 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 21, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1

The effects of cleaning treatments on the surface

2

composition of porous materials

3

∞ S. Jelavić *, A.R. Nielsen, M. Blažanović, N. Bovet, K. Bechgaard , S.L.S. Stipp

4

Nano-Science Center, Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5,

5

Copenhagen Ø 2100, Denmark ∞

6

deceased

7

8

Keywords: organic contamination, petroleum, core plug, clay mineral, recalcitrant organic matter

9

10

ABSTRACT

11

Removal of organic compounds is a common first step in surface characterisation of inorganic materials.

12

To explore the surface reactivity of environmental samples such as rocks, soil and sediments, it is

13

essential to know if they are pure or covered with organic material. Our purpose was to evaluate the

14

influence of some common cleaning procedures on the surface composition of inorganic solids and to

15

investigate if such treatments result in completely clean mineral surfaces. We used Soxhlet solvent

16

extraction and chemical oxidation to remove crude oil from samples that we synthesised to represent oil

17

bearing sandstone. After each cleaning step, we tracked surface composition using X-ray photoelectron

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 31

18

spectroscopy. We demonstrated that: i) it was impossible to completely remove the organic material with

19

any of the methods, ii) the oxidation treatment dissolved soluble minerals and iii) surface composition

20

was dominated by clay particles adhering to the larger grains, thus was responsible for a significant

21

fraction of the residual adsorbed organic compounds. The most important conclusion is that the pore

22

surface composition, i.e. the clay fraction not the bulk matrix composition, ought to be used for

23

thermodynamic and kinetic calculations to predict pore fluid composition and evolution during transport

24

through pore networks.

25

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 3 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

26

INTRODUCTION

27

Removing organic compounds from the mineral surfaces in rocks, soils and sediments (inorganic

28

matrices) is essential for valid nanoscale characterisation and interpretation of mineral or matrix

29

properties1,2. We rely on nanoscale characterisation in studies of surface reactivity because this approach

30

offers molecular insight into the processes that control the interaction between minerals and

31

environmental fluids, allowing them to be described from fundamental principles. However, even a small

32

amount of organic material is enough to dramatically change the properties of inorganic surfaces and

33

render studies of the inorganic substrate challenging or impossible3–5. The cleanliness of investigated

34

surfaces is important in a range of disciplines6,7 but it is essential for studies of the reactivity of minerals

35

with small particle size and high adsorption capacity because organic contamination can change their

36

properties from essentially hydrophilic to hydrophobic8–12. Thus, if the results of experiments are to have

37

meaning and conclusions are to be translated to other systems, it is necessary to know if the surfaces of

38

natural materials are pure, clean terminations of the bulk mineral or if adsorbed organic compounds

39

dominate.

40

There are many methods for removing organic compounds from inorganic substrates. Techniques of

41

physical separation are based on a difference in solubility between the organic and inorganic phases and

42

methods of chemical separation are based on differences in reactivity towards oxidation. The classical

43

methods include Soxhlet, shake-flask and sonication extractions. Some more recently developed, more

44

technically demanding methods include supercritical fluid extraction, pressurised liquid extraction,

45

microwave assisted extraction and matrix solid phase dispersion13,14. These are less common because of

46

equipment costs, method development time and higher risk of damage to the inorganic material because

47

they all use a combination of high temperature and pressure.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 31

48

Among the traditional separation techniques, the Soxhlet extraction has been used most. It gives good

49

reproducibility and high recovery, i.e. effective separation of the organic phase15,16. Soxhlet extraction is

50

very good for removing complex organic mixtures from a porous medium, such as oil from core plugs or

51

humus from soil, because the extraction efficiency increases with molecular weight of the extract17. The

52

overall efficiency of the Soxhlet extraction however, depends on the properties of the organic compounds

53

and the solvent used for extraction. The possibilities for organic solvent are many13 and the choice is

54

usually based on reactivity and polarity. For successful extraction, solvents should cause minimal change

55

in the composition of the extract and the solid and ought to be of similar polarity as the extract.

56

Most previously reported studies about removing organic material from an inorganic matrix have

57

concentrated either on the analysis of the organic compounds after solvent extraction13,15–19 or on changes

58

in bulk composition of the porous medium20–22. We could find no reports in the literature about the

59

influence of solvent extraction, such as the Soxhlet treatment, on the pore surfaces. If the matrix materials

60

are to be used for further studies, such as for determining the extent of their reactivity, it is essential to

61

choose an extraction method that is effective at removing the organic material but that has minimal effect

62

on the surface composition and structure.

63

Chemical oxidation degrades organic compounds to CO2 and H2O with various by-products that depend

64

on the initial composition of the organic material. Oxidation is quick and relatively simple but there is a

65

risk of violent reaction. Unlike the Soxhlet method, which is suitable for handling large fractions of

66

organic material within an inorganic matrix (e.g. oil saturated reservoir core plugs or point contamination

67

in soil), chemical oxidation is preferred where the fraction of organic material is small. However,

68

chemical oxidation risks changes in the composition of the inorganic matrix, dissolving some phases,

69

precipitating undesirable secondary phases or changing the structural properties of the minerals or the

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

70

matrix22. Often, the rate or the extent of the oxidising reaction is controlled by the pH of the solution but

71

changes in acidity can detrimentally affect mineral solubility. The effects of the treatment then raise

72

questions about the nature of the investigated surfaces: How successful are the common cleaning

73

methods? Do cleaned surfaces make the inorganic solid surface accessible? Or is organic contamination

74

always present?

75

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Soxhlet solvent extraction and chemical

76

oxidation in recovering the pure, inorganic surfaces and to determine what changes in composition the

77

cleaning procedures promote in the inorganic matrix. We compared the surface composition after each

78

cleaning step, so we could follow the sequential removal of the various carbon species and monitor for

79

dissolution of less stable minerals. We synthesised a sample by mixing known proportions of known

80

minerals to produce an unconsolidated sand sample with realistic mineral composition. We then exposed

81

our model matrix to crude oil for 30 days. Using our model sand instead of a real rock or sediment

82

provided us with a sample where we were sure of the initial composition, both bulk and surface, where

83

we could test each treatment in sequence and accurately monitor changes in the surface composition,

84

avoiding uncertainties arising from amorphous or highly refractive organic compounds that could be

85

associated with real, consolidated samples.

86

We used X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to track changes in surface composition before it was

87

mixed with oil and then after the oil was removed, by physical separation using: i) a mixture of

88

dichloromethane and methanol (DCMM) and ii) toluene. We chose DCMM for extracting the polar and

89

nonpolar organic compounds and toluene for extracting the very resistant, nonpolar molecules. Later, the

90

residual oil compounds, that were resistant to physical separation, were chemically removed by oxidation

91

using iii) hydrogen peroxide. We chose H2O2 as the oxidant because, among the many possible

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 92 5 6 7 93 8 9 94 10 11 12 95 13 14 15 96 16 17 18 19 97 20 21 98 22 23 24 99 25 26100 27 28101 29 30 102 31 32 33103 34 35104 36 37105 38 39 40106 41 42107 43 44 108 45 46 47 109 48 49 50110 51 52111 53 54 112 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 31

compounds, it affects the least the original surface composition of the minerals. Other oxidants dissociate during the reaction and promote adsorption or exchange of surface cations for Na+ ions (e.g. NaOCl and Na2S2O8).

MATERIALS AND METHODS Preparation of the model sand. We mixed pure or purified mineral standards to make the model sample. Phyllosilicate minerals were obtained from the Source Clays Repository.23 Kaolinite (KGa1b) was used as received and was not further purified because the standard purification by size separation does not decrease the amount of TiO2 impurities. Clinochlore (CCa2) is a rock. To decrease it to the µm particle size readily encountered in sands, but to avoid overgrinding it and damaging its layered structure, CCa2 was only hand crushed in an agate mortar and we used the