The Effects of Galvanic Interactions with Pyrite on ... - ACS Publications

Apr 2, 2018 - Environmental Services, Edinburgh, South Australia 5111, Australia. ∥. Blue Minerals Consultancy, Wattle Grove, Tasmania 7109, Austral...
1 downloads 6 Views 6MB Size
Subscriber access provided by - Access paid by the | UCSB Libraries

Remediation and Control Technologies

The effects of galvanic interactions with pyrite on the generation of acid and metalliferous drainage Gujie Qian, Rong Fan, Michael D. Short, Russell Schumann, Jun Li, Roger St.C. Smart, and Andrea R Gerson Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05558 • Publication Date (Web): 02 Apr 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 2, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

86x38mm (150 x 150 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

1

The effects of galvanic interactions with pyrite on the

2

generation of acid and metalliferous drainage

3 4

Gujie Qiana,b†, Rong Fana, Michael D. Shorta,b, Russell C. Schumanna,c, Jun Lia,

5

Roger St.C. Smarta,d and Andrea R. Gersond*

6 a

7

Natural and Built Environments Research Centre, School of Natural and Built Environments,

8

University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia b

9

Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia c

10

Levay & Co. Environmental Services, Edinburgh, SA 5111, Australia d

11

Blue Minerals Consultancy, Wattle Grove, TAS 7109, Australia

12 13 14 15 16



Present address: College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia

*Corresponding author: [email protected]

17

18

Abstract

19

Although the acid generating properties of pyrite (FeS2) have been studied extensively, the

20

impact of galvanic interaction on pyrite oxidation, and the implications for acid and

21

metalliferous drainage, remains largely unexplored. The relative galvanic effects on pyrite

22

dissolution were found to be consistent with relative sulfide mineral surface area ratios with

23

sphalerite (ZnS) having greater negative impact in batch leach tests (sulfide minerals only,

24

controlled pH) and galena (PbS) having greater negative impact in kinetic leach column tests

25

(KLCs, uncontrolled pH, >85 wt% silicate minerals). In contrast the presence of pyrite

26

resulted consistently in greater increase in galena than sphalerite leaching suggesting that

27

increased anodic leaching is dependent on the difference in anodic and cathodic sulfide

28

mineral rest potentials. Acidity increases occurred after 44, 20 and 12 weeks in the pyrite–

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 28

Page 3 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

29

galena, pyrite–sphalerite and the pyrite containing KLCs. Thereafter acid generation rates

30

were similar with the Eh consistently above the rest potential of pyrite (660 mV, SHE). This

31

suggests that treatment of waste rocks or tailings, to establish and maintain low Eh conditions,

32

may help to sustain protective galvanic interactions and that monitoring of Eh of leachates is

33

potentially a useful indicator for predicting changes in acid generation behaviour.

34 35

Keywords: Acid and metalliferous drainage; Acid generation; Batch leaching; Galvanic

36

interaction; Kinetic leach columns; mixed sulfides

37

38

1. Introduction

39

Acid and metalliferous drainage (AMD) is a global environmental issue. AMD occurs

40

primarily due to pyrite (FeS2) oxidation (Eqs. 1 and 2), generating acidic leachate often with

41

associated toxic metals/metalloids e.g. As, Pb, Cu, Zn, Cd 1-3. Although AMD can occur due

42

to natural weathering processes, it is largely manmade resulting from both operating and

43

abandoned mine sites containing sulfidic mineralisation. Many previous studies have focused

44

on the kinetics of pyrite oxidation

45

microbes including iron-oxidisers and sulfate-reducers 8-12.

4-7

, with much attention paid to the interacting roles of

46

FeS + 3.5O + H O → Fe + 2SO  + 2H

(1)

47

FeS + 14Fe + 8H ) → 15Fe + 2SO  + 16H

(2)

48

However, a further factor affecting pyrite oxidation in natural systems is its co-existence with

49

other sulfide minerals

50

potentials are in electrical contact, particularly in acidic solutions, electron transfer occurs

51

from the sulfide with the smaller (anode) to the greater rest potential (cathode). A galvanic

52

cell is formed in which the cathode is galvanically-protected and the anode is preferentially

5, 13-16

. When semi-conductive sulfide minerals with differing rest

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 28

17-19

53

dissolved/oxidised

. Among common sulfide minerals, pyrite has a relatively high rest

54

potential (660 mV SHE at pH 4; Table 7 in Li et al., 2013

55

minerals such as sphalerite (460 mV SHE; pH 4) or galena (400 mV SHE; pH 4).

56

Heidel, et al. 20 found that pyrite oxidation decreases in the presence of sphalerite and galena,

57

due to galvanic interaction, during which sphalerite and galena are preferentially dissolved.

58

However, the system investigated contained all three sulfide minerals such that any unique

59

effect of sphalerite or galena could not be differentiated. Chopard, et al.

60

geochemical

61

pyrite−sphalerite mixtures (50 wt% quartz, 25 wt% of each sulfide). They suggested that

62

galvanic coupling occurs between pyrite and chalcopyrite or sphalerite, resulting in reduced

63

pyrite oxidation and increased chalcopyrite and sphalerite dissolution. However, it was

64

acknowledged that the content of sulfide minerals (50 wt%) chosen was not typical of AMD

65

mine wastes.

66

Galvanic interaction has also been proposed in other studies to slow pyrite oxidation, or

67

increase the oxidation of sphalerite or galena 22-25 but the impact on dissolution kinetics were

68

not specifically examined. The variation of galvanic effect as a function of pH under AMD-

69

relevant conditions is also unknown. Given that AMD encompasses a range of acidic pH

70

conditions, understanding the effect of pH on galvanic coupling would enable better

71

understanding of AMD processes within multi-sulfide systems. Accordingly, the aims of this

72

study were:

73

Aim 1 − to gain more detailed understanding of the effect of galvanic interaction on the

74

dissolution of sulfides as a function of AMD-relevant pH. To achieve this the

75

dissolution kinetics of both single- and bi-sulfide mineral systems was examined

76

using batch leaching, under controlled conditions.

experiments,

using

weathering

17

cells

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

), as compared to other sulfide

with

21

carried out

pyrite−chalcopyrite

or

Page 5 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

77

Aim 2 − to investigate the impacts of galvanic interaction on acid generation at low sulfide

78

content representative of AMD wastes. For this purpose kinetic leach columns,

79

using conditions which approximate those found in fully-oxygenated zones,

80

containing single and mixed sulfide wastes were undertaken.

81

82

2 Materials and Methods

83

2.1 Minerals

84

Natural quartz, K-feldspar, chlorite (clinochlore), pyrite, galena and sphalerite (Geo

85

Discoveries, New South Wales, Australia) were all confirmed to be > 90 wt% purity using

86

powder X-ray diffraction (XRD). See Supporting Information S1 for elemental compositions.

87

2.2 Batch leach experiments

88

Fifteen batch leach tests consisting of five mineral systems (pyrite, sphalerite, galena, pyrite–

89

galena, and pyrite–sphalerite) were carried out for 645 days (duplicate experiments were not

90

carried out). For each batch leach experiment, two grams (38–75 μm; see Section 4.1 for

91

calculation of the specific surface area of each sulfide) of either single sulfide minerals or

92

thoroughly mixed sulfides with mass ratio of 1:1 were added into 1 L. Batch leach tests were

93

maintained at room temperature (22±2 °C) under quiescent (non-stirred), air-saturated

94

conditions at pH 3.0 (±0.1, controlled using HCl), 5.0 (±0.2, controlled using HCl) and 7.4

95

(±0.4, calcite-saturated solution). Solution samples (10 mL) were collected periodically for

96

analysis (see Figures S1 and S2 for sampling intervals). For mineral sample preparation and

97

further experimental details see Supporting Information S2. The 1:1 sulfide ratio by weight

98

was chosen such that the dissolution of galvanically-coupled mixed sulfides, rather than

99

‘uncoupled’ sulfides, was ensured.

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

100

2.3 Kinetic leach columns

101

Kinetic leach columns were run for a period of 76 weeks (532 days). Sulfides, chlorite, K-

102

feldspar and quartz, used for kinetic leach column (KLC) tests (compositions given in

103

Table 1), were all dry-crushed to 20 wt% water (calculated as per 27) after each flush. This dropped

132

to 2–7 wt% subsequent to cyclical heating. Leaching with ‘wet and dry’ cycles provides

133

conditions that approximate those found in the field for an oxygenated zone containing

134

sulfide materials. It was assumed on the basis of previous studies that oxygen was saturated

135

throughout the KLCs 28, 29.

136

2.4 Extraction of secondary precipitates

137

EDTA can be used to dissolve oxidised metal ions as complexes providing an estimate of the

138

extent of oxidation of all minerals. It does not cause the dissolution of metal ions from un-

139

oxidised sulfide mineral surfaces 30 or from crystalline silicates and other bulk minerals 31.

140

Leached solids (0.5 g; not further crushed) were collected from each batch leach residue for

141

EDTA extraction. A representative amount of leached solids (50 g) collected at the end of

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

142

each KLC test (week 76) was further dry-crushed and dry-sieved to