The Thermodynamics of Aqueous Sodium Hydroxide Solutions from

BY HERBERT S. HARNED AND JOHN C. HECKER. Harned and Nims2 by measurements of the electromotive forces of the cells Ag I AgCl [ NaCl (m) I Na,Hg 1 ...
0 downloads 0 Views 784KB Size
HERBERT S. HARNED AND JOHN C. HECKER

4838

[CONTRIBUTION FROM THE

DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY

Vol. 55

OF Y A L E UNIVERSITY ]

The Thermodynamics of Aqueous Sodium Hydroxide Solutions from Electromotive Force Measurements' BY HERBERTS. HARNED AND JOHN C. HECKER Harned and Nims2 by measurements of the electromotive forces of the cells Ag AgCl [ NaCl (m) Na,Hg NaCl (0.1) AgCl Ag through the temperature range of 0 to 40' have computed the activity coefficient, the partial molal heat content relative to 0.1 M sodium chloride, and the relative partial molal specific heat of sodium chloride in aqueous solution. These results are the first of their kind in which cells containing sodium amalgam electrodes were employed. More recently, Harned and Ehlers by employing the cells HZ HC1 (m)AgCl Ag have made a very comprehensive study of the above thermodynamic properties of hydrochloric acid in aqueous solution from 0 to 60°.a In order to complete a work in which we have in the first place measured the sodium amalgam electrode and in the second place the hydrogen electrode against the silver-silver chloride electrode, we have completed measurements of the cells Hz [ NaOH (mz) Na,Hg NaOH (ml) Hz, in which the hydrogen electrode is measured against the amalgam electrode. The only earlier measurements of these cells were made by Harned, whose results were obtained a t only one temperature, 25'. The present measurements are much more comprehensive and include results a t 5' intervals from 0 to 35' i n c l ~ s i v e . ~ There is little doubt that measurements of this kind are very valuable for the determination of partial free energies and activity coefficients. Since the relative partial molal heat contents and specific heats are obtained from the first and second derivatives of the original electromotive forces great accuracy in the evaluation of these quantities is difficult to obtain. In the case of hydrochloric acid solutions, excellent agreement with the best calorimetric determinations of these quantities was attained. Amalgam cells are difficult and, consequently, it is not to be expected that so great precision is possible as with the simpler cells. We shall show, however, that good values of the heat data are obtainable. In the case of sodium chloride solutions, Harned and Nims did not extrapolate their values of the partial molal heat content to zero concentration of salt but gave their results relative to zero a t 0.1 M . An important feature of the present study is the introduction of a method of extrapolation of this quantity which we have employed not only with our results but with those of Harned and Nims.

I

I

1

I

1

I

1

1

1

1

I

(1) This communication contains material from a dissertation presented by John C. Hecker, to the Graduate School in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, June, 1933. (2) Harned and Nims, THISJOURNAL, 64, 423 (1932) (3) Harned and Ehlers, ibid., l S , 2179 (1933) (4) Harned, ibid., 47, 677 (1925).

THERMODYNAMICS OF AQUEOUSSODIUM HYDROXIDE

Dec., 1933

4BQ

Materials, Experimental Technique and Electromotive Forces of the Cells: Hz NaOH (m) Na,Hg NaOH (0.05) Hz.-The highest grade of sodium hydroxide purified by alcohol was used. A saturated solution was prepared and the sodium carbonate which is insoluble in this solution settled to the bottom of the flask. The clear solution was drawn off into freshly distilled carbon dioxide-free water which formed a stock solution of approximately 4 M. This solution was boiled under reduced pressure and kept in an atmosphere of carbon dioxide-free air. From this solution 15 liters of 0.05 M solution was prepared and kept under nitrogen. A glass tube led directly from the vessel containing this solution to the cells which were fixed in the thermostat. The solutions a t the different concentrations in the other half of the cell were made by diluting the stock solution, were boiled under reduced pressure and kept in an atmosphere of nitrogen until introduced into the cell. Titration with weight burets against gravimetrically analyzed hydrochloric acid solutions was employed for purposes of standardization. The concentrations were known to *0.05%. A type of cell similar to that employed by Harned4 which contained flowing sodium amalgam electrodes was used. A vacuum technique was employed. One modification of the cell design should be mentioned. An additional stopcock was placed between the hydrogen and amalgam electrode compartments in each half cell. This made it possible to use the same hydrogen electrode half cells a t each of the eight temperatures a t which measurements were made. The cells were filled with the oxygen free solutions at 0' with the stopcock open, hydrogen electrodes were introduced and four hours allowed for them to attain equilibrium. The amalgam was allowed to flow and a measurement taken. At the end of the measurement after all the amalgam 'had flowed from the dropper, the stopcocks between the hydrogen and amalgam electrodes were closed. The amalgam droppers were removed and replaced by rubber stoppers. The amalgam half cells were then drained, evacuated and refilled with solution, and the amalgam introduced into the dropper. In the meantime, the thermostat temperature was raised 5'. Two hours were allowed for the 5 measurement of electromotive force cell to reach equilibrium before the ' was made. The same procedure was repeated for each succeeding measurement until a temperature of 35' was reached. The hydrogen electrodes were of the usual platinized platinum foil type. The sodium amalgam was prepared as described by Harned and was approximately 0.01% by weight of sodium. The temperature control was

I

I

I

I

*0.02'.

The original electromotive forces made a t fourteen concentrations and eight temperatures were of necessity a t odd concentrations and were first smoothed to round Concentrations. In the first place, a small correction

HERBERT S. HARNEDAND JOHN C. HECKER

4840

Vol. 55

was made to remedy the fact that the reference solution was not quite 0.05 M . The smoothing to round concentrations was then carried out in the following manner. The electromotive forces of the cells are given by 2RT 2RT wz E----In-=-ln-+-lnNF 0.05 NF

Y

RT

Po.06

pm where y is the activity coefficient of sodium hydroxide in a solution of concentration m, and y0.06 is its activity coefficient in the 0.05 M reference solution. The second term on the right represents the contribution to the electromotive force produced by the transfer of water which takes place in the cell according to the equation NaOH (m)f HzO (0.05) = NaOH are the vapor pressures of water over the (0.05) HzO (m). p , and solutions of concentrations m and 0.05, respectively. A sensitive large graph was made by plotting the left side of equation (1) against m"' a t each temperature. From the values of this function at round concentrations, smoothed values of E were obtained a t each temperature. At constant composition, E may be expressed as a function of the temperature by the equation Yo.05

NF

+

E = Eo

+ at + bt2

(2)

where Eo is the electromotive force a t Oo, a and b are constants and t is centigrade temperature. The constants were determined by the method of least squares. Table I contains the values of the electromotive forces computed by equation (2) as well as the values of the constants of this equation. Comparison with measured values is shown by parenthesized TABLEI ELECTROMOTIVE FORCES OF THE CELLS: HZ NaOH (nz) NazHg NaOH (0.05) Hz, CALCULATED BY EQUATION (2), AND DEVIATIONS, Ecalod. - Eob.

I

.

I

I

1

m

1 . .oo

50

100

15'

0.25 .5 1 1.5 2 2.5

0.06929 .lo018 .I3156 .I5113 ,16600 ,17853 .19033 .20176 ,21261

0.07070( 12) .10027( 15) .13444(4) .15445(4) .169G3(3) .18261( -17) .19471( - 19) .20618( -9) .21711( -4)

0.07207( 4) .10431(3) .13725( -4) .15767( -2) .17317( -2) .18652( -9) .19893( -8) .21046( - 16) .22148( -9)

0.07341( -3) .10628( -8) .13997(0) .16082( -2) .17662( -2) .19030(2) .20296( - 1) .21459( - 1) .22572(0)

3 3.5 4 rn

t . . ,200

0.25 .5

0.07471(3) .10826(0) .14261( -2) .16386( -3) .17997( -1) .19392(5) .20683(8) .21859( 17) .22981(0)

1

1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

25'

0.07596( -5) .11017( - 1 ) .14519(1) .16682(1) .18322(0) .19740(8) .21050(6) .22245( - 1) .23375(7)

30'

0.07719( -9) .11203( -6) .14767(3) .16969(7) .18637(8) .20072(3) .21402(9) .22617(5) .23758(6)

350

0.07839(9) .11385(6) .15007( -3) .17247( -4) .18944( -4) .20391( -8) .21734( -11) .22973( -7) .24126( -7)

Dec., 1933

THERMODYNAMICS O F AQUEOUS SODIUM HYDROXIDE

4841

TABLE I (Concluded) Constants of equation (2) 0.25

m

0.5

a X lo6 . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 - b X 106. . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.73 -b’ X 106.. ........... .6 2

m

a X 10‘ j . . . . . . . . . . . . 736 -b X 106 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.91 -b‘ X lo6............ 2.15

1.5

1

422 0.90 1.0

585 1.59 1.55

2.5

3

829 2.97 2.45

895 2.52 2.62

3.5

898 2 82 2.78

672 1.79 1.90 4

915 2.76 2.94

figures, which give the deviations in hundredths of millivolts. The values of b were plotted against the temperature and the smoothed values b’, to be used later on to compute the relative partial molal heat capacity, are also given in the table. Activity Coefficients.-In order to compute y, or ( Y ~ ~ Y ~ ~i t) is ~ ” , first necessary to compute the vapor pressures of the solutions. By rearranging equation (I) and substituting k for 2.3026 RTIF, we obtain

The vapor pressure of the solvent is related to the activity coefficient of the solute by the equation

Upon substituting the limits corresponding to m and 0.05, integrating and rearranging this equation, we obtain 1

P0.06

1

log - - 55,51 m log Pm

y ~0.05

( m - 0.05) + 55.51 X 2.303

The desired term on the left was evaluated by arithmetical approximation. As a first approximation the last term on the right was employed to compute this quantity. This approximate value along with E and m were substituted on the right of equation (3) and the first approximation to the logarithm of the activity coefficient ratios was obtained. With these values the first term on the right of equation (5) was evaluated graphically. This plus the last term of equation ( 5 ) served to give a closer approximation to one-half the logarithm of the vapor pressure ratio which latter when substituted in equation (3) gave a closer estimate of the logarithm of the activity coefficient ratios. This process was repeated until the values of equation (5) remained constant. Table I1 contains the results of this calculation a t the designated molalities and a t 0 and 35’. It is important to note that the temperature coefficient of the quantity in question is small and varies only in the fourth decimal place. One in this decimal place corresponds to only a difference of 0.01 mv. Consequently, the correction may be regarded as constant or independent of the temperature since this

HERBERT s. HARNEDAND JOHN

4842

c. HECKER

VOl. 55

assumption is within the experimental error. As a consequence the effect of the vapor pressure ratios upon the temperature coefficient of E is negligible, a fact which is of considerable value when we come to the computations of the heat data.

m . . . . . . . . . . . 0.25 ‘/z log po.oslp,: 0 ” .. . . . . . . .

35”. . . . . . . .

TABLE I1 THEI’APOR PRESSURE TERM 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

3.5

3

4

0.0015 0.0033 0.0071 0.0110 0.0152 0.0197 0.0248 0.0313 0.0369 .0015 ,0033 .0072 ,0111 ,0152 .0199 .0251 ,0311 .0367

The final values of log 7 0 . 0 5 are given in Table 111. In order to obtain data, we employed the equation of Hiickel or equation (11) in the communication of Harned and Eh1e1-s.~ The values used for the constant of the Debye and Hiickel theory were those computed by Harned and Ehlers and given in the second column of their Table VII. The A and B constants of this equation were evaluated and are given in Table 111. yo.o5 from these

TABLE I11 ACTIVITYC O E F F I C I E N T DATAAND CONSTANTS log

O F HUCKEL’S

EQUATION

(Yh’0.M)

m Oo 50 100 15’ 200 25’ 30’ 359 0.05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0590 .0584 - .0592 - .0584 .25 - .0611 - .0598 .0572 - .0593 ,0737 ,0726 - ,0721 .5 - .0789 - ,0765 - .0748 .0719 - ,0702 .0838 - .0821 - .0809 - ,0803 - .0807 1 - .0941 - .0898 - .0864 .0813 - ,0793 - .0780 - ,0772 - .0774 1.5 L .0935 - .0886 - ,0846 ,0723 - .0700 - .0685 - ,0677 - .0678 2 - .0855 - ,0802 - .0758 .0541 - ,0514 - .0501 - ,0498 - .0509 2.5 - ,0713 - ,0640 - ,0584 ,0276 - ,0247 - ,0236 - ,0235 - .0245 3 - .0467 - ,0386 - .0322 3.5 - .0146 - ,0103 ,0032 ,0024 -t .0013 ,0034 f .0044 f .0047 4 ,0219 ,0275 ,0315 .0343 .0358 f ,0360 ,0355 f ,0337

-

+

A

Q(BJ B -log

70.0)

Y0.W

m 0.05 .25 ,50 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

+

0.688 3.00 0.0410 ,0861 ,820 00

0.05002 .2506 .5023 1.0058 1.510 2.013 2.514 3.015 3.508 4.000

0.721 3.14 0.0410 ,0859 .821 50 0.05002 .2505 .5020 1,005 1.508 2.010 2.510 3.009 3.504 3.993

---

+ +

+

-

-

+ +

+

Constants of Hlickel’s equation 0.738 0.752 0.718 3.10 3.20 3.25 0.0432 0.0472 0.0422 .0868 .0861 ,0863 .819 ,820 ,820 Normal concentrations, c 100 15’ 200

0.05000 .2503 .5015 1.004 1,506 2.007 2.506 3.003 3.498 3.985

0.04997 ,2501 ,5010 1.003 1.504 2.005 2.505 2.998 3.492 3.976

0.04992 .2497 .5003 1.002 1.501 2.001 2.500 2.994 3.485 3.969

0.754 3.24 0.0460 ,0875 ,818 25’ 0.04986 .2494 .4998 ,9990 1.499 1.997 2.496 2.985 3.477 3.962

+

0.825 3.54 0.0420 .0871 .818

0.814 3.45 0.0434 0.0881 .816

30’ 0.04978 .2491 .4988 .9981 1.489 1.994 2.490 2.976 3.469 3.950

350 0.04971 .2488 .4980 ,9957 1.483 1.989 2.484 2.972 3.463 3.941

The values of the apparent ionic diameter, “a,” computed from A by means of equation (12) and the values of K’ in Table VI1 of Harned and Ehlers’ was obpaper are also given, By employing these constants, -log

Dec., 1933

THERMODYNAMICS OF AQUEOUS SODIUM HYDROXIDE

4843

tained, from which the values of yo.o6given in Table I11 were evaluated. The concentrations c, in moles per liter of solution, which are necessary for these calculations are recorded in the lower part of this table. I t is important to note that the Hiickel equation may be used to compute the experimental values of y from 0.05 to 1 M and is not valid in the more concentrated solutions. This is similar to the behavior of hydrochloric acid in aqueous solution a - ~found by Harned and Ehlers. We have not resorted to the additional refinements imposed by Harned and Ehlers since owing to the greater difficulties inherent in our measurements, the accuracy although good is not equal to that obtainable with the simpler cell employed by them. However, the use of the Hiickel equation may be expected to yield a good extrapolation for y and a value of 7 0 . 0 6 which is probably correct to within *0.002. Incidentally, the present results a t 25” agree well up to 1.5 M with those of H a n ~ e d . ~The values of the mean distance of approach “a” are reasonable. The fact that they show a tendency to increase with the temperature should not be taken seriously, since in the cases where “a” appears to increase, B tends to decrease. Therefore, we conclude from these results that as a -first approximation “a” is not a function of the temperature and has a value of approximately 3.3 A. The Relative Partial Molal Heat Content of Sodium Hydroxide.By the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation

gm- H0.m

= NEF

- NFT ( d E l d T )

(6)

the partial molal heat content relative to the 0.05 M solution may be computed from the electromotive forces. We desire the partial molal heat content of the hydroxide and not that of both hydroxide and water which as previously pointed out would be derived from the processes taking place within the cell. Fortunately, since the vapor pressure term in equation (3) can be taken to be independent of the temperature without interfering with the accuracy, it is only necessary to apply the vapor pressure correction to the electromotive forces and not to their temperature coefficients. Therefore, we may express the electromotive forces, E’, resulting from the transfer of sodium hydroxide only by E’ Eo’ at bt* (7) whence it is obvious that the original a and b values can be employed for computing the temperature coefficients without further change. Since we desire or Bm-% it is necessary for us to devise methods for the evaluation of ~ , , , , - ~If, c ,as. shown by Harned and Ehlers, the Debye and Hiickel equations with supplementary constants permit an accurate calculation of the activity coefficients, this can be done by substitution of log y in the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation and subsequent differentiation. In the following treatment of this subject, we have developed this method in a general manner and in a way which renders the computations relatively easy. From the equations thus derived an empirical extrapolai=

+ +

HERBERT S. HARNED AND JOHN C. HECKER

4844

VOl. 55

tion formula has been obtained which has proved useful in the present instance and also permits the extrapolation of the results obtained by Harned and Nims with sodium chloride solutions. 12 may be computed from the well known equation -

Lz

=

blnf bT

-uRP -

(8)

by substitution of the value of In f,the logarithm of the “rational” activity coefficient, or the activity divided by the mole fraction, as expressed by an equation which is the equivalent of Hiickel’s equation. Thus

Taking D, c, a, T and b as variables, this differentiation gives

At constant temperature, L, w ,and y are constants. The first term is the limiting slope resulting from the Debye-Huckel theory and is expressed by L = - - 3 Re2 3.557 X 109 4

kD (DT)lh

(

+

T dD D dT

+

-)

TdV 3 V dT

(11)

w =

By using the values of dD/dT computed from the equation according to Wyman5 and the values of d “d”/dT obtained from the densities of water,6 the values of L, w and y given in Table IV were evaluated. It is obvious that -d log v/d log T = d log “d”/d log T. “a” in centimeters may be TABLE IV I N EQUATIONS (10)

AND (16) x x 10s w x 10-12 L Q - 2 x 104 4.358 2.665 8.360 0 153 3.40 4.349 2.787 9.238 5 169 3.67 4.338 2.916 10.092 10 190 3.96 4.327 3 053 10.909 15 210 4.22 4.315 3.195 11.692 20 23 1 4.48 4.302 3.345 25 254 4.72 12.452 4.288 3.503 13.177 30 278 4.96 4.274 3.668 13.869 35 303 5.19 4.258 3.844 14.539 40 329 5.44 4.243 4.026 15.326 45 357 5.67 4.226 4.218 15.776 50 385 5.89 4.209 4.418 16.318 55 414 6.08 4.192 4.633 16.863 60 446 6.30 Values of constants: e = 4.774 X 10-LO; N = 6.061 X 1023; k = 1.372 X 10-l‘; R = 1.9885; 1 cal. = 4.185 joules; F = 96,500. VALUES OF QUANTITIES

1,

oc.

( 5 ) Wyman, Phys. R e v , 86, 623 (1930); Harned and Ehlers, THISJOURNAL, 65, 2179 (1933). ( 6 ) “International Critical Tables,” McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 1928, Vol. 111.

THERMODYNAMICS O F AQUEOUSSODIUM HYDROXIDE

Dec., 1933

4845

calculated from the parameter, A, of Hiickel's equation by a = Ax, and b is related to the parameter B in Hiickel's equation by bc = 2.3026 Br. Values of x are also given in Table IV. At constant temperature it can be seen that the second term of equation (10) is a function of c/(l A dF)2, and the third term is a function of G. Therefore, at a given temperature

+

in which K and K' are constants. The cell measures Brnand not E,. Therefore, it is necessary to construct two equations at two concentrations a t which H , - H,,,, has been measured and solve simultaneously for K and K'. In the present - Ho.06a t 0.25 M and 1 M were substituted, instance, the values of B,,, and the constants obtained are given in Table V. - With the use of these - HOwere computed. From constants in equation (12), the values of these and the values of prncalculated by equation (6) and smoothed in the table were compiled. by plotting against mila, the values of

zo.06

zo.05

TABLE V RELATIVE PARTIAL HEATCONTENT OF SODIUM HYDROXIDE : m

0.05 .25 .5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

-K -K'

50

00

-

7 - 200 - 390 670 810 940 -1060 -1125 -1175 -1190 X lo-' 3.26 X 10-8 0 . 1

-

22 - 130 - 305 - 540 - 670 770 870 - 925 - 980 -1000 3.02 0.102

-

100

50 50 -190 -410 -520 -615 -700 -730 -750 -795 2.22 0.236

-

15'

80 30 - 95 -280 -360 -420 -460 -475 -485 -490 1.54 0.316

200

108 100 - 10 -160 -205 -240 -260 -260 -250 -240 1.24 0.390

zo.os

5

26'

-g o (CAL.) 30'

35'

137 167 200 180 250 330 80 115 315 - 20 130 270 - 50 100 260 - 80 100 300 - 70 145 360 - 35 200 430 5 250 520 50 310 600 0.934 0.485 0.014 .277 .286 ,330

As a check upon this computation of - Ho, we have employed equation (9), and obtained 18, 100 and 180 cals. at 5, 20 and 35O, respectively. These results agree as well as expected with 22, 108 and 200 cal. obtained by the use of equation (12). The final results are shown in Fig. 1 in which is plotted against mila a t 0, 20, 25 and 30". The dotted line represents the values obtained by Rossini' from calorimetric data at 18' whence it is seen that good agreement has been obtained. The curves are of the same form as those obtained in the case of sodium chloride by Harned and Nims. This could be predicted by equation (10) and a knowledge of the temperature coefficients of a and B. The first term of this equation is positive. da/dT will be ( 7 ) Rossini. Bur. Standards J . Research, 6 , 791 (1931).

c.

HERBERT s. HARNEDAND JOHN HECKER

4846

VOl. 55

zero or nearly so. This will make the second term negative since y is negative and larger than the contribution due to the term containing the temperature coefficient of log I'. Now, if dB/dT is positive and greater than dc/dT, which in all cases is negative above 5", the third term of equation (10) will be negative. This state of affairs is true in the cases of sodium chloride and hydroxide solutions. If dB/dT is negative, as with hydrochloric acid solutions, then the third term of equation (10) will be positive, a fact previously discussed by Harned and Ehlers.

---A

IQ

25" 20

- 500- 1000 - 1500

t I

0

0"

I

I

0.5

1.0

I

1.5

20

??$'/e.

Fig. 1.-The

relative partial molal heat content of sodium hydroxide in aqueous solution.

The peculiar tendency of the curves in Fig. 1 to bend upward in the concentrated solutions indicates that empirical equation (12) is not valid a t concentrations above 1nl. An additional term such as Dcn in the original Debye and Hiickel equation for In f should remedy this defect. Harned and Ehlers employed a term Dc2 with success in their treatment of hydrochloric acid solutions. Since our data are not of as high accuracy as theirs, we have not resorted to this refinement. This discrepancy does not detract from the usefulness of equation (12) to determine at some low reference concentration such as 0.05 M . The Relative Partial Molal - Heat Capacity of Sodium Hydroxide in Aqueous Solution.-C$ - C p ,was obtained in a manner similar to that described by Harned and Ehlers. For the cells in question, the relation between E and relative partial molal heat capacity is given by

-

Cm.w

- -C,

a=E

= NFT -

b T2

From equation (2) d 2 E / d T 2 = 2b

Hence

C,

-

-, ,C

=

- NFT2b

Dec., 1933

4847

THERMODYNAMICS OF AQLTEOUS SODIUM HYDROXIDE

The values of this quantity may be computed from the smoothed values of b, given by b‘ in Table I. If these are added to 6 cal., which is found to be ur from the slope of the plot of H,,,, - ZO against TI the - value of Cp may readily be obtained. The limiting equation of the Debye and Huckel theory can conveniently be expressed by -

cpu

cp, cpu

C,

-

C,

dF

= YZ~Z~Q

(16)

Values of Q from 0 to GO” were computed and are included in Table IV. I n Fig. 2, - Eo,a t 25’ is plotted against m”’. The dotted line represents the results recently obtained by Gucker and Schminkes from calorimetric measurenients from 0.04 to 2.5 M . The agreement is good when we consider that the maxirnum deviation is 2 cal., which ocNaCl curs a t 1 Ai. Cur results also NaOH check those c o m p u t e d b y Rossini to within a few calorie~.~ H - ZOand E, - Cp, of Sodium Chloride from Electromotive Force Data.-iVe have previously mentioned that Harned and Xiins in their investigation of sodium chloride solutions determined - p, of this electrolyte but did not extrapo!ate their results to zero concentration. Further, they used a graphical method involving plots of m1/2. first order differences of the Fig. 2.-The relative partial molal specific heat of electromotive forces against sodium hydroxide in aqueous solution at 25 ’. the temperature in order to obtain the constants of equation ( 2 ) and subsequently, fl Since our earlier computations did not agree with the calorimetric data so well as in the cases of sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid solutions) we have subjected the results to a recalculation by using the method of least squares for evaluation of n and b constants of equation ( 2 ) . We found that the new values of - Bo,l derived therefrom did not differ sufficiently from those obtained by Harned and Nims to warrant a published revision. Our next step was to employ equation (12) in order to determine at 0.1 M . The values of A employed were those given by Harned and Nims. - HOwas found to be -88, -50, -10, 29, 68, Suffice to say that go,l

c,

a,,l.

zz

(8) Gucker and Schminke, THISJ O U R Y A L , 65, 1013 (1933). (0) Rossini, Bur. S t a n d a r d s J Research, 7, 47 (1931).

HERBERT S. HARNED AND JOHN C. HECKER

4848

VOl. 55

106, 146, 186 and 225 at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40°, respectively. If these be added to the values given in Table I11 of Harned and Nims, as measured from their electromotive forces may be computed. From - coo a t this concentrathe slope of the plot of a t 0.1 M against T , tion is found to be 8 cals. The agreement with calorimetric data is only fair. At 18' the results agree with values recently computed by Rossini to within *30 cal., which is considered very At 25O, our results do not check those recently computed by Robinsonlo nearly so well. They agree up to 0.5 M quite closely. Above this concentration, the difference increases until it reaches a maximum of 100 cal. a t 1.5 M and then decreases to 50 cal. a t 4 M. This maximum deviation corresponds to an error of approximately 0.01 mv. per degree in the temperature coefficient of electromotive force. In general, show a wider spread with temperature than those comour values of puted from the calorimetric data. This leads to higher values for Eo than were found by Randall and Rossini.'l For the sake of comparison, we have reevaluated - C*, by the method employed in the present communication. Thus, according to equation (15), we have ( E p - C,) = (C, - C,,.,) + C(,, - C,) = - NFT2b + 7.9 (17) In Table VI are given the values of b and - a t 25' which latter are shown in Fig. 2 by inked-in circles. It is to be noted that these results are nearly the same as those for sodium hydroxide. As previously pointed out by Harned and Nims, the agreement with the values of Randall and Rossini is only fair.

z2

c,

z2

cpo

co

c, coo

TABLE VI

(Ep - -Cp0),,OF SODIUMCHLORIDE m . . . . . . . . . 0.05 0.1 ( - b ) X-106-0.25 .. (Cp Cp,) 4.5 7.9

-

0.2 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0.32 0.90 1.47 1.93 2.22 2.50 2.75 2.98 3.20 12.3 20.3 28.1 34.4 38.4 42.3 45.7 48.9 51.9

Further Considerations.-The present investigation completes a series of results in which the hydrogen, silversilver chloride and sodium amalgam electrodes have been combined with each other to form three separate cells from the measurements of which the thermodynamic properties of aqueous hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide and sodium chloride have been computed. The most important feature of results of this kind is the determination of the partial free energies and activity coefficients, since such determinations yield directly information regarding the fundamental parameters which are employed to express these quantities. When we attempt the determination of partial molal heat contents and heat capacities, we are subjecting the original data to a very severe test, since the (10) Robinson, THISJOURNAL, 64, 1311 (1932). (11) Randall and Rossini, ibid., 61, 323 (1929).

Dec., 1933

NORMAL POTENTIAL OF THE QUINHYDRONE ELECTRODE

4849

determination of these quantities involves the first and second merentia1 coefficients of the original results with the temperature. If our results agree with those determined by well conducted calorimetric measurements, we have reason to believe in the accuracy of the original electromotive forces as well as the calorimetric data. In matters of this sort, it is very important to obtain agreement by the use of entirely different experimental mechanisms. Considering all the difficulties,' both experimental and arithmetical, we regard the agreement so far obtained to be very encouraging, particularly in those cases when the amalgam electrode has been employed. This among other facts surely indicates that these measurements approach closely the cell mechanism which has been premised.

Summary

1

I

I

I

1. Measurements of the cells Hz NaOH (m) Na,Hg NaOH (0.05) Hz have been made from 0 to 35' at 5' intervals. 2. From these, activity coefficients, relative partial molal heat contents and heat capacities of sodium hydroxide from 0 to 35' have been computed. Good agreement has been obtained with calorimetric data. 3. A useful equation for the extrapolation of the partial molal heat content has been developed. STERLING CHEMISTRY LABORATORY NEWHAVEN, CONNECTICUT

[CONTRIBUTION FROM THE STERLING CHEMISTRY

RECEIVED AUGUST17, 1933 PUBLISHED DECEMBER 14, 1933

LABORATORY OF YALE

UNIVERSITY ]

A Study of the Cell, Pt/Quinhydrone, HCl (0.01 M)/AgCl/Ag, and the Normal Electrode Potential of the Quinhydrone Electrode from 0 to 40°1 BY HERBERTS. HARNED AND DONALD D. WRIGHT Since its introduction in 1921, the quinhydrone electrode has found wide use as a convenient substitute for the hydrogen electrode in determining the PH of acid solutions, particularly in cases where the substances under examination are reduced by hydrogen in the presence of platinum black. However, in relatively few instances has it been employed in cells without liquid junctions, for the precise evaluation of thermodynamic data. Therefore, preliminary to using such cells in a determination of the dissociation constants of chloroacetic and other substituted acids, we found it necessary to study carefully the cell Pt/Quinhydrone, HC1 (m)/AgCl/Ag

(1)

( 1 ) The material contained in this paper forms part of the dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Yale University by Donald D. Wright in June, 1933, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.