Upgrading sewage sludge liquefaction bio-oil by microemulsification

Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO LIBRARIES

Article

Upgrading sewage sludge liquefaction bio-oil by microemulsification: the effect of ethanol as polar phase on solubilization performance and fuel properties Xiaowei Ding, Xing-zhong Yuan, Lijian Leng, Huajun Huang, Hou Wang, Jianguang Shao, Longbo Jiang, Xiaohong Chen, and Guangming Zeng Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02269 • Publication Date (Web): 05 Jan 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 6, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Energy & Fuels is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1

Upgrading sewage sludge liquefaction bio-oil by microemulsification:

2

the effect of ethanol as polar phase on solubilization performance and

3

fuel properties

4

Xiaowei Ding a, b, Xingzhong Yuan a, b, *, Lijian Leng a, b, Huajun Huang c,

5

Hou Wang a, b, Jianguang Shao a, b, Longbo Jiang a, b, Xiaohong Chen d,

6

Guangming Zeng a, b

7

a

8

410082, P.R. China

9

b

College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha

Key Laboratory of Environment Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University),

10

Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, P.R. China

11

c

12

Nanchang 330045, P.R. China

13

d

School of Land Resources and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University,

School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, P.R. China

Corresponding author at: College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P.R. China. Tel.: +86–731–88821413; Fax: +86–731–88823701; E-mail address: [email protected] (X.Z. Yuan).

*

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

14

Abstract: Sewage sludge liquefaction bio-oil is capturing extensive attention for its

15

sustainability and easy availability. However, some limitations of bio-oil such as high

16

viscosity and poor cold flow properties hamper its direct application in engine. Two

17

microemulsions including ethanol-in-diesel (M1) and diesel microemulsion (M2)

18

were produced to upgrade bio-oil. Adding ethanol in M1 facilitated bio-oil

19

solubilization and improved fuel properties of bio-oil. Because of low viscosity and

20

low pour point of ethanol, M1 with ethanol as polar phase produced a more promising

21

bio-fuel with acceptable viscosity and better cold flow properties compared with M2.

22

Through microemulsification in diesel, hydrophilic and hydrophobic bio-oil

23

components may penetrate into polar core and continuous phase, respectively, while

24

amphiphilic components mainly located at interface. The hydrogen-bonding between

25

ethanol and hydrophilic bio-oil components could enhance solubilization and improve

26

stability. Besides polar phase ethanol could also act as solvent to dissolve more

27

less-hydrophilic bio-oil components into polar core.

28

Keywords: Sewage sludge (SS); Liquefaction bio-oil; Ethanol; Microemulsion; Fuel

29

upgrading

2


Page 2 of 35

Page 3 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

30

Nomenclature M1

Ethanol-in-diesel microemulsion

M2

Diesel microemulsion

BHMBs

Bio-oil hybrid diesel microemulsion based bio-fuels

BEMB

Bio-oil/ethanol-in-diesel microemulsion based bio-fuel

BDMB

Bio-oil-in-diesel microemulsion based bio-fuel

SS

Sewage sludge

MEs

Methyl esters

PP

Pour point

TAN

Total acid number

TG

Thermogravimetry

DTG

Differential thermogravimetry

DTGmax

The maximum degradation rate

Ea

Activation energy

3


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

31

32

1. Introduction

Facing with the exhaustion of petroleum and the stringent regulations upon

33

environment, renewable energy resources are attracting mounting attention as they

34

can solve the two aforementioned problems.1-3 Sewage sludge (SS), a kind of

35

renewable wastes, could not be used safely as fertilizer because of organic and

36

inorganic pollutants in it.4, 5 However, conversion of SS to bio-oil can not only

37

dispose of bulky wastes but also recover rich energy in SS.6 Liquefaction bio-oil

38

derived from SS has been extensively studied and considered as one of the most

39

feasible alternative fuels.7-12 Because of some shortcomings of bio-oil such as high

40

viscosity13, 14 and aging15, bio-oil upgrading process becomes inevitable before using

41

it in diesel engine.

42

Among present upgrading processes including hydrodeoxygenation,

43

emulsification, catalytic cracking and solvent addition, emulsification is distinguished

44

for its simple procedure and low chemicals consumption. Compared with emulsion,

45

microemulsion shows more superiorities, since it can form spontaneously and perform

46

long shelf-life.2, 16-18 Moreover, microemulsion with lower activation energy could

47

ignite more easily than emulsion.19 Despite such advantages of microemulsion, there

48

is only limited information concerning microemulsifying bio-oil with other fuels.

49

Before emulsifying bio-oil, pre-treatment processes are often conducted to remove

50

bio-oil heavy components.20, 21 In the present study, we intend to microemulsify

51

bio-oil directly in diesel with the help of ethanol without any need of pre-treatment. In 4


Page 4 of 35

Page 5 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

52

this way, economically speaking, it cut down on production cost; technologically, it

53

facilitated the application of bio-oil in engine.

54

Ethanol is a promising bio-fuel among all the renewable fuel resources because

55

of its availability in large volume. The unique physicochemical characteristics of

56

ethanol make it used widely as a fuel directly or as fuel additive.22 The individual

57

application of ethanol in engine could reduce torque output and power, as a result,

58

ethanol is often blended with other fuels as additive.23 As a cosolvent, ethanol was

59

often blended with bio-oil to reduce viscosity and remain homogeneity.24 Interestingly,

60

adding ethanol in microemulsion was proved to increase the film flexibility and

61

extend the homogeneous microemulsion area.25 It was found that introducing ethanol

62

with microemulsion-forming could enhance the flexibility of application of ethanol in

63

diesel engine compared with blend-forming.26 Due to the polarity of ethanol, it could

64

be used in place of water as the polar phase to formulate ethanol-in-oil

65

microemulsion.27-29 Furthermore, unlike water which may increase the viscosity of

66

dispersion, ethanol could make an obvious improvement on viscosity.25, 30 The higher

67

energy content of ethanol than water might be an added advantage. Meanwhile, its

68

good cold flow properties such as low pour point (PP) could accelerate the application

69

of blended fuels in cold areas.31 Because of high latent heat of vaporization of ethanol,

70

it could delay combustion with large amount of heat released in the expansion stroke,

71

thus improving brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) and brake thermal efficiency

72

(BTE).32 As an oxygenated fuel, ethanol could promote complete combustion and 5


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

73

reduce NOx, PM and PAHs emissions.33 Overall, adding ethanol can not only

74

introduce desirable fuel properties but also make the most of energy in blended fuels

75

and abate pollutant emissions. Given the above advantages of ethanol, it was used as

76

polar phase here to formulate microemulsion for bio-oil solubilization and upgrading.

77

To the knowledge of the authors, the application of ethanol for solubilizing bio-oil

78

into other fuels via microemulsification was rarely involved.

79

In this study, with the goal of upgrading bio-oil by microemulsification,

80

ethanol-in-diesel microemulsion (M1) was firstly used to solubilize bio-oil and

81

circumvent the undesirable properties such as higher viscosity, low stability and poor

82

cold flow properties which often occur with the commonly used diesel microemulsion

83

(M2).34-36 There were four objectives as follows: (1) to prepare two microemulsion

84

dispersions, i.e., M1 and M2 (without additional polar phase) for bio-oil solubilization,

85

the produced bio-fuels were termed as bio-oil/ethanol-in-diesel microemulsion based

86

bio-fuel (BEMB) and bio-oil-in-diesel microemulsion based bio-fuel (BDMB),

87

respectively; (2) to study the physicochemical and thermochemical characteristics of

88

bio-oil hybrid diesel microemulsion based bio-fuels (BHMBs) including BEMB and

89

BDMB; (3) to elucidate the solubilization mechanism of ethanol-in-diesel

90

microemulsion and evaluate fuel properties of corresponding bio-fuels.

91

2. Materials and methods

92

2.1. Materials 6


Page 6 of 35

Page 7 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

93

Diesel (0#) was purchased from a local petrol station in Changsha, China. Span

94

80 (sorbitan monooleate, purity > 98%) was the surfactant used with a HLB

95

(hydrophilic-lipophilic balance) value of 4 ±1. Five alcohols (n-butanol, n-pentanol,

96

n-hexanol, n-heptanol and n-octanol) were used for co-surfactant optimization.

97

Different proofs of ethanol (200º–170º proofs, 0-15vol.% water content) were used as

98

polar phase.

99

2.2. Liquefaction bio-oil solubilization

100

2.2.1. Bio-oil production

101

SS was collected from a local wastewater treatment plant. Through drying and

102

grinding, 12 g dry SS and 150 mL methanol were blended in an autoclave (GSHA-0.5,

103

China), which was heated to 300 oC. After 20 min retention at 300 oC, the products

104

were rinsed by ethyl acetate and filtered to separate solid and liquid. The solvent

105

(methanol and ethyl acetate) and water were removed from bio-oil by vacuum-rotary

106

evaporation at reduced pressure 50 oC and 90 oC, respectively.

107

2.2.2. Bio-oil solubilization

108

Initially, 5.0 mL diesel, surfactant and co-surfactant were blended in a 10 mL

109

centrifuge tube to form an amphiphile solution. Then water or different proofs of

110

ethanol was added and the blend was hand-shaken vigorously until the homogeneous

111

microemulsion was obtained, which took no more than 2 min. Next, 1.0 g bio-oil was

112

mixed with the microemulsion. The tube was hand-shaken vigorously for 1 min and 7


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

113

then was placed in a water bath shaker for 20 min at 150 rpm to allow the

114

solubilization of bio-oil reach the equilibrium. Through centrifugation, the precipitate

115

formed at the bottom (the bio-oil-rich phase), was the fraction which cannot be

116

solubilized in microemulsion. While the supernatant, BHMBs, were subjected to

117

further investigations.

118

Two parameters were used to evaluate the bio-oil solubilization performance of

119

microemulsion. One parameter µ (g/g) was defined as the solubilized bio-oil mass of

120

unit mass of bio-oil. The other E (g/mol), indicating the solubilization efficiency of

121

surfactant, was defined as the bio-oil mass solubilized in per mole of surfactant.

122

2.3. Bio-oil hybrid diesel microemulsion based bio-fuels characterization

123

2.3.1. Physicochemical and thermochemical properties

124

Elemental, GC-MS and thermogravimetric analyses were used to investigate the

125

physicochemical and thermochemical properties of BHMBs. The detailed information

126

about analytical methods could be found in S1 in Supporting Information.

127

2.3.2. Fuel properties

128

Fuel properties of samples such as the viscosity, PP and total acid number (TAN)

129

were determined. More measurement information can be found in S2 in Supporting

130

Information.

8


Page 8 of 35

Page 9 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

131

3. Results and discussions

132

3.1 Bio-oil solubilization

133

3.1.1. Effect of surfactant concentration

134

Above critical micelle concentration (CMC, the concentration of surfactant in the

135

bulk of continuous phase where micelles start forming), microemulsion could form

136

spontaneously when bringing all the components together. The CMC of Span 80 in

137

diesel was certified as 0.15 M previously.36 Fig. 1 shows that the solubilized bio-oil

138

amount increased continuously with surfactant concentration. However, the

139

solubilization efficiency of surfactant (E) had a reverse trend along the concentration

140

range except a slight increase at 0.30 M. More and smaller reverse micelles may be

141

formulated at higher surfactant concentrations,37 as a result, the total solubilized

142

bio-oil amount of microemulsion could increase while the solubilized amount of per

143

mole surfactant reduced. Consequently, surfactant concentration of 0.30 M was used

144

in later experiments.

145

3.1.2. Effect of co-surfactant type and C/S mass ratio

146

Fig. 2 shows that adding co-surfactant favored the solubilization of bio-oil

147

compared with the case without co-surfactant. Co-surfactant could help form a

148

structured and stable microemulsion by reducing rigidity of interface and improving

149

flexibility of the interfacial film.38 Emax (the maximum solubilization efficiency of

150

surfactant in each C/S ratio, Ci represents alcohol with carbon number of i, i=4, 5, 6, 9


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

151

7, 8) reached its highest value at C/S ratio 0.9 with n-octanol as co-surfactant. It may

152

be due to that N-octanol, with the most negative ∆Gt o (the standard Gibbs free energy

153

of transfer of co-surfactant from oil to interface) value and negative entropic change,

154

could easily locate at the interface as co-surfactant.39 At a fixed surfactant

155

concentration, excess co-surfactant molecules may pack themselves between

156

surfactant and edge off surfactant from the surface. This could reduce the amount of

157

surfactant at the surface and restrain solubilization capacity of microemulsion. Based

158

on these results, n-octanol was chosen as co-surfactant with the C/S ratio at 0.9.

159

3.1.3. Effect of polar phase type

160

To investigate the effect of polar ethanol on bio-oil solubilization, different

161

proofs of ethanol (or pure water) were investigated and the phase behaviors were

162

recorded. Fig. 3(a) shows that apart from dispersions with 200° proof ethanol as polar

163

phase, all the other dispersions had two phases divided by an obvious boundary. The

164

upper was homogeneous microemulsion. The lower was heterogeneous emulsion

165

which may be induced by greater polarity difference between hydrous ethanol and

166

diesel.33 Dispersion with 200° proof ethanol as polar phase could formulate a single

167

microemulsion phase. Given stronger stabilities of microemulsion, using it in engine

168

can eliminate phase separation problem intrinsically associated with emulsion. Bio-oil

169

solubilization capacities of different microemulsions were also studied. Fig. 3(b)

170

displays that adding ethanol in microemulsion promoted the solubilization of bio-oil.

171

The solubilized bio-oil amount increased with increasing ethanol proportion in polar 10


Page 10 of 35

Page 11 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

172

phase. When 200° proof ethanol was used as polar phase, the solubilized bio-oil

173

amount reached the maximum. There are many kinds of compounds contained in

174

bio-oil such as alcohols, phenols, nitrogenous compounds and esters,12 and some of

175

them were not miscible with water but miscible with ethanol. Ethanol is a commonly

176

used solvent for blending with bio-oil.40 They could mix well and form a stable blend

177

without adding additives.41 Therefore, the microemulsion with higher proofs of

178

ethanol as polar phase could solubilize more bio-oil. Considering phase behavior and

179

solubilization performance, 200° proof ethanol was a suitable polar phase. In later

180

sections, ethanol all refers to 200° proof ethanol unless otherwise noted.

181

3.1.4. Effect of polar phase amount

182

Different ethanol volumes from 0.1 to 2.0 mL were added in 5 mL diesel to

183

select an appropriate one for bio-oil solubilization. Fig. 3(c) displays that the

184

microemulsions with ethanol as polar phase solubilized more bio-oil than M2

185

(without adding polar phase). Polar bio-oil has difficulties in directly blending with

186

diesel while could easily mix with polar solvent ethanol.42 Increasing ethanol dose

187

enhanced the solubilization of bio-oil at certain volume range. Above 1.0 mL of

188

ethanol, the solubilized bio-oil amount experienced reduction. Ethanol may compete

189

with bio-oil in solubilization process and it might take priority of being dissolved in

190

microemulsion compared with bio-oil.20 When ethanol accounted for a great

191

percentage, the amphiphiles were mostly consumed to solubilize ethanol. The bio-oil

192

solubilization was hindered as a result of the solubilization capacity saturation of 11


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

193

amphiphiles. In terms of the structure of the interfacial layer, when ethanol

194

concentration increased, the surfactant content at the interface became lower than that

195

in diesel.43 The amount of effective amphiphiles adsorbing at the interface reduced.

196

Meanwhile, molecular association between surfactant and co-surfactant was weaker.

197

Thus, the solubilization capacity of microemulsion would decline.43 To ensure strong

198

solubilization capacity, the ethanol volume of 1.0 mL was chosen.

199

3.2. BHMBs characterization

200

3.2.1. Elemental composition

201

The elemental compositions of diesel, bio-oil and two BHMBs are tabulated in

202

Table 1. Because of high nitrogen content, direct combustion of bio-oil may have a

203

potential of emitting more NOx. The lower nitrogen content in BHMBs indicates that

204

microemulsification of bio-oil with diesel could significantly dilute nitrogen in fuel

205

system. Adding ethanol not only dilutes nitrogen further but also introduces OH

206

radicals. OH radicals may reduce soot emissions by oxidizing soot precursors.44

207

Compared with BDMB, BEMB might reduce PAH as ethanol dilute aromatic content

208

in original diesel and facilitate complete combustion.33 Furthermore, additional

209

oxygenates of BEMB may shorten ignition delay due to a more rapid and higher

210

production of H2O2.45 Higher H/C and lower O/C of BHMBs both improve calorific

211

value compared with bio-oil.

212

3.2.2. Chemical composition

213

The chemical composition of BHMBs was obtained through GC-MS analysis 12


Page 12 of 35

Page 13 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

214

and tabulated in Table S1. Bio-oil mainly contained esters (especially methyl esters)

215

and included some N/P-containing compounds, alcohols, phenols, acids and

216

hydrocarbons (Fig. 4(a)). Esters were dominantly dissolved in microemulsion

217

followed by alcohols/phenols (BEMB) or N/P-containing compounds (BDMB) (Fig.

218

4(b)). Fig. 4(c) shows that esters were concentrated through microemulsification

219

compared with crude bio-oil, while other compounds were diluted. N/P-containing

220

compounds may impede the development of bio-oil as transport fuel because of

221

potential NOx emissions. Interestingly, M1 had lower solubilization capacity for

222

N/P-containing compounds than M2 (Fig. 4(c)). As seen in Table 1, the content of

223

nitrogen in BEMB was lower than that in BDMB. Overall, ethanol in M1 could not

224

only dilute nitrogen but also reduce the solubilization of N-containing compounds.

225

These results demonstrate that adding ethanol in microemulsion was favorable for

226

solubilizing and upgrading bio-oil.

227

3.2.3. Thermochemical properties

228

Thermogravimetry (TG) and differential thermogravimetry (DTG) curves of

229

samples were plotted by thermogravimetric analysis and shown in Fig S1. Table 2

230

shows that the solubilization of bio-oil had little influence on Tmax while reducing

231

DTGmax of M1 and M2 after microemulsification. It indicates that bio-oil may retard

232

degradation. The reduction of DTGmax was higher for M1 (0.11 mg/min) than that of

233

M2 (0.05 mg/min). Ethanol in M1 may help solubilize more bio-oil and the

234

solubilized bio-oil could significantly retard degradation of fuels. The lower 13


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 35

235

degradation rate could reduce peak combustion temperature and abate NOX

236

emissions.46 The activation energy (Ea) was appropriate to evaluate reactivity in the case of

237 238

mixtures of renewable and petroleum fuel.47 It is closely related to the ignition delay.

239

The lower the Ea, the shorter the ignition delay.19 It could be calculated according to

240

the equation below:48

241

 ART 2  2 RT ln [ − ln(1 − x)] = ln  1 − Ea  BEa 

242

x=

243

Where W0, Wt and W∞ are the original, instantaneous and final weights of the sample,

244

respectively. The slope of the plot ln [-ln (1–x)] versus 1/T produces the Ea.

245

  Ea  −   RT

(1)

W0 - Wt W0 - W∞

(2)

Table 2 displays that bio-oil had higher Ea than diesel. It means that bio-oil was

246

more difficult to ignite due to prolonged ignition delay. Additional energy may be

247

required to facilitate the ignition of bio-oil at the beginning of combustion.49

248

Compared with diesel, M1 and M2 showed reduced Ea. After microemulsification

249

with bio-oil, the Ea even remained lower than that of diesel. Therefore,

250

microemulsification could effectively reduce the Ea of bio-oil and improve its

251

combustion quality. The unique structure of microemulsion may facilitate ignition by

252

exerting stimulative effects on cracking/combustion.50 Adding ethanol in

253

microemulsion reduced the Ea of M1 compared with M2 (Table 2). Ethanol could

254

ignite easily and thus cause rapid rise in temperature due to its high flammability.51 14


Page 15 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

255

The presence of ethanol in microemulsion could offset the increase of Ea caused by

256

the solubilized bio-oil. As a result, BEMB had lower Ea than BDMB. It manifests that

257

ethanol in M1 makes it superior to upgrade bio-oil concerning the ease of ignition.

258

3.3. Solubilization mechanism

259

In the present study, reverse micelle microemulsion (ethanol-in-diesel) was

260

prepared with bio-oil entering into the internal and/or the external of microemulsion.

261

Bio-oil contains hydrophilic, amphiphilic and hydrophobic components. The locations

262

of these components in microemulsion depend on many factors such as their

263

physicochemical properties, microemulsion composition and thermodynamic

264

conditions of the interfaces.52 After microemulsification, there may be several ways

265

for solubilizates from bio-oil to co-exist with microemulsion system. As shown in Fig.

266

5(a), reverse micelle microemulsion can be divided into four regions including oil

267

continuous phase (diesel), the interfacial layer consisting of palisade layer (surfactant

268

tails) and inserted oil molecules, transition region and hydrophilic core.

269 270

According to the composition of bio-oil, there might be three approaches for bio-oil components to be solubilized in microemulsion.

271

I: hydrophilic bio-oil components like alcohols, phenols and acids might

272

preferentially penetrate into hydrophilic core in terms of “likes dissolve likes”

273

principle. Other bio-oil fractions such as hydrophobic hydrocarbons and amphiphilic

274

esters had difficulty in entering into hydrophilic core, since they are less-hydrophilic.

275

Ethanol as an organic solvent could dissolve many kinds of compounds, as a result, 15


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

276

the above less-hydrophilic fractions may be solubilized in ethanol core of BEMB (Fig.

277

5(b)). In this case, other than as polar phase, ethanol could also function as a solvent.

278

As for BDMB, it may only entrap hydrophilic bio-oil components into hydrophilic

279

core because of the absence of any solvent in core.

280

II: hydrophobic bio-oil components such as hydrocarbons were likely to be

281

solubilized in diesel (Fig. 5(c)). This could also be explained by “likes dissolve likes”

282

principle. In this way, the solubilizates could easily blend with diesel without the

283

expense of surfactant.

284

III: amphiphilic bio-oil components such as methyl esters (MEs) had a complex

285

solubilization pattern due to their unique properties. Here it was divided into three

286

substrates as illustrated in Fig. 6 and interpreted as follows.

287

(a): It was reported that MEs could serve as surfactant.53 MEs of bio-oil could

288

capture free surfactant/co-surfactant molecules spreading at the air/oil surface or in

289

diesel to form new reverse micelles (Fig. 6(a)). Therefore, more solubilization media

290

were available to solubilize bio-oil. Ethanol is a hydrogen-bond donating solvent.

291

The hydrogen donors groups (– OH) in ethanol could strongly interact with the

292

hydrophilic and oxygenated bio-oil components, while with the aid of Van der Waals

293

forces, the nonpolar hydrocarbon chains have good affinity with the hydrophobic

294

bio-oil components and diesel. Consequently, the addition of ethanol in BEMB could

295

enhance the solubilization for bio-oil and make the microemulsion more stable.

296

(b): Amphiphilic bio-oil components may also interact with the interfacial layer 16


Page 16 of 35

Page 17 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

297

(Fig. 6(b)). MEs from bio-oil could co-adsorb with Span 80 at the interface as

298

surfactant. Medium-chain alcohols from bio-oil could insert themselves between

299

surfactant molecules acting as co-surfactant. Consequently, a mixed interfacial film

300

could formulate which was easy to bend.54 Part of esters such as ethyl oleate was

301

found located at the surfactant tails.55 Likewise, MEs could be entangled in the

302

palisade layer with hydrophobic chain intertwining with surfactant tails (Fig. 6(b)). In

303

this case, amphiphiles could serve as stabilizers and solubilizates simultaneously.

304

(c): Like surfactant molecules, linker molecules (including lipophilic and

305

hydrophilic linkers) also could self-assemble in microemulsion.56 The partition of

306

lipophilic linkers in palisade layer could enhance the solubilization of polar oil (fatty

307

acid esters). Long chain alcohols, acids, phenols and some of esters from bio-oil could

308

act as lipophilic linkers to facilitate the solubilization of bio-oil.59 Esters with a short

309

lipophilic moiety and carboxylic compounds contained in bio-oil may serve as

310

hydrophilic linkers and co-adsorb with surfactant at the interface.57, 58 The

311

combination of lipophilic and hydrophilic linkers would offer assembled-surfactant

312

and exert a synergism on solubilization performance (Fig. 6(c)).57

313

3.4. Fuel properties

314

Fuel properties of samples are displayed in Table 3. Density and viscosity are

315

closely related with spray characteristics of fuel. The higher the viscosity, the more

316

likely the fuel could induce engine durability problems.59 Bio-oil produced here was 17


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

317

highly viscous (266.84 cSt). The viscosity value was reduced by two orders of

318

magnitude after microemulsification. BEMB had lower viscosity (4.17 cSt) than

319

BDMB (6.98 cSt). PP provides a reliable reference to the cold flow properties of fuel.

320

Bio-oil had poor cold flow properties (PP = 1 oC), and this limits its popularization in

321

cold areas. After being microemulsified with diesel, PP of bio-oil was reduced. As a

322

result, the cold flow properties of bio-oil were improved. Particularly, BEMB showed

323

even lower PP (-18 oC) than diesel (PP = -12 oC), while BDMB had higher PP (-11 oC)

324

than diesel.

325

More obvious improvements on viscosity and cold flow properties occurred in

326

BEMB. They could be ascribed to the addition of ethanol. Ethanol was commonly

327

considered as viscosity modifier to reduce the viscosity of viscous fuel.31 By

328

controlling ethanol addition, the viscosity could drop to an acceptable level. With

329

ethanol introduced in microemulsion, BEMB could greatly reduce the viscosity of

330

bio-oil. Due to the extremely low PP of ethanol (-117.3 oC),31 adding it into M1 could

331

be the main reason for which BEMB significantly reduced PP of bio-oil. Thus, the

332

usage of BEMB in engine was more temperature-robust for better cold flow properties.

333

Although the calorific value of ethanol was only 26.7 MJ/kg,32 it did not compromise

334

the calorific value of BEMB. It may be due to that the relatively low ethanol content

335

in microemulsion could not make great negative contributions to the total calorific

336

value. Moreover, as an oxygen-rich fuel, ethanol could promote combustion and help

337

release more energy contained in diesel. As a result, the effect of low calorific value 18


Page 18 of 35

Page 19 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

338

of ethanol on combustion could be offset to some extent.

339

High carbon residue represents the potential of depositing in combustion

340

chamber and damaging engine.60 Bio-oil had a high carbon residue (6.70%). Both

341

BEMB and BDMB reduced carbon residue, while the former had a greater reduction.

342

Oxygen in ethanol could promote clean combustion33 thus further reducing carbon

343

residue of BEMB compared with BDMB. Therefore, BEMB displayed more

344

improvements on combustion quality and engine durability than BDMB. Dilution of

345

bio-oil with diesel cause an expected reduction of sulfur content and the resultant

346

bio-fuels met the standard set for diesel in China (GB 252-2011).

347

High acidity, sediment and phase separation of fuel would damage engine for the

348

formation of corrosion and deposit. Considering long-term application of BHMBs in

349

engine, the corrosivity and stability of fuel deserve attention. Through

350

microemulsification with diesel, the TAN of bio-oil reduced. The stability results

351

show that sediment occurred in BDMB and bio-oil, whereas neither sediment nor

352

phase separation was observed in BEMB. The mutual reactions such as

353

polymerization and esterification between bio-oil components could induce aging

354

and instability.16 Ethanol is often used to blend with bio-oil for higher stability,24

355

consequently, BEMB with ethanol added could mitigate this undesirable instability

356

phenomenon, unveiling its stronger compatibility with engine than BDMB. Coupling

357

these results, BEMB may have a long-term application in engine without severe

358

failure. 19


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

359

360

4. Conclusions

Ethanol-in-diesel microemulsion was prepared here to solubilize and upgrade

361

bio-oil. Ethanol could not only favor the bio-oil solubilization but also circumvent its

362

disadvantages. With ethanol as polar phase, BEMB reduced the viscosity and PP of

363

bio-oil from 266.84 cSt and 1 oC to 4.17 cSt and -18 oC, respectively, and the carbon

364

residue and TAN of bio-oil also decreased. Moreover, the ignition quality of bio-oil

365

improved due to reduced Ea after adding ethanol. Ethanol could not only dissolve

366

more less-hydrophilic bio-oil components in polar core, but also solubilize more

367

hydrophilic bio-oil components through the hydrogen-bonding. The interaction

368

between ethanol-in-diesel microemulsion and bio-oil would offer high stability to the

369

system. Further and deeper investigations are warranted in application to engine.

370

Acknowledgments

371

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the

372

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21276069, 71431006, 51521006);

373

the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctor Program of Higher Education, China

374

(No. 20120161130002); and the Key Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences

375

Research, Ministry of Education, P.R. China (No. 13JZD0016).

376

References

377 378 379

(1) Jayasinghe, P.; Hawboldt, K. A review of bio-oils from waste biomass: Focus on fish processing waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012, 16, (1), 798-821. 20


Page 20 of 35

Page 21 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422

(2) Xiu, S.; Shahbazi, A. Bio-oil production and upgrading research: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012, 16, (7), 4406-4414. (3) Huber, G. W.; Iborra, S.; Corma, A. Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: Chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. Chemical Reviews 2006, 106, (9), 4044-4098. (4) Shao, J.; Yuan, X.; Leng, L.; Huang, H.; Jiang, L.; Wang, H.; Chen, X.; Zeng, G. The comparison of the migration and transformation behavior of heavy metals during pyrolysis and liquefaction of municipal sewage sludge, paper mill sludge, and slaughterhouse sludge. Bioresource technology 2015, 198, 16-22. (5) Xiao, Z.; Yuan, X.; Jiang, L.; Chen, X.; Li, H.; Zeng, G.; Leng, L.; Wang, H.; Huang, H. Energy recovery and secondary pollutant emission from the combustion of co-pelletized fuel from municipal sewage sludge and wood sawdust. Energy 2015, 91, 441-450. (6) Malins, K.; Kampars, V.; Brinks, J.; Neibolte, I.; Murnieks, R.; Kampare, R. Bio-oil from thermo-chemical hydro-liquefaction of wet sewage sludge. Bioresource technology 2015, 187, 23-9. (7) Yuan, X.; Leng, L.; Huang, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, H.; Xiao, Z.; Zhai, Y.; Chen, H.; Zeng, G. Speciation and environmental risk assessment of heavy metal in bio-oil from liquefaction/pyrolysis of sewage sludge. Chemosphere 2015, 120, 645-52. (8) Leng, L.; Yuan, X.; Shao, J.; Huang, H.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Zeng, G. Study on demetalization of sewage sludge by sequential extraction before liquefaction for the production of cleaner bio-oil and bio-char. Bioresource technology 2016, 200, 320-7. (9) Leng, L.; Yuan, X.; Huang, H.; Jiang, H.; Chen, X.; Zeng, G. The migration and transformation behavior of heavy metals during the liquefaction process of sewage sludge. Bioresource technology 2014, 167, 144-50. (10) Huang, H.-j.; Yuan, X.-z. Recent progress in the direct liquefaction of typical biomass. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2015, 49, 59-80. (11) Huang, H.-j.; Yuan, X.-z.; Li, B.-t.; Xiao, Y.-d.; Zeng, G.-m. Thermochemical liquefaction characteristics of sewage sludge in different organic solvents. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2014, 109, 176-184. (12) Leng, L.; Yuan, X.; Chen, X.; Huang, H.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Zhu, R.; Li, S.; Zeng, G. Characterization of liquefaction bio-oil from sewage sludge and its solubilization in diesel microemulsion. Energy 2015, 82, 218-228. (13) Huang, H.-j.; Yuan, X.-z.; Zhu, H.-n.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.-l.; Zeng, G.-m. Comparative studies of thermochemical liquefaction characteristics of microalgae, lignocellulosic biomass and sewage sludge. Energy 2013, 56, 52-60. (14) Wang, Y.; Chen, G.; Li, Y.; Yan, B.; Pan, D. Experimental study of the bio-oil production from sewage sludge by supercritical conversion process. Waste management 2013, 33, (11), 2408-15. (15) Zhang, M.; Liaw, S. B.; Wu, H. Bioslurry as a Fuel. 5. Fuel Properties Evolution and Aging during Bioslurry Storage. Energy & Fuels 2013, 27, (12), 7560-7568. (16) Chen, D.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, X. Evaluation methods and research 21


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465

progresses in bio-oil storage stability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014, 40, 69-79. (17) Zhang, Q.; Chang, J.; Wang, T.; Xu, Y. Review of biomass pyrolysis oil properties and upgrading research. Energy Conversion and Management 2007, 48, (1), 87-92. (18) McClements, D. J. Nanoemulsions versus microemulsions: terminology, differences, and similarities. Soft Matter 2012, 8, (6), 1719-1729. (19) Leng, L.; Yuan, X.; Zeng, G.; Wang, H.; Huang, H.; Chen, X. The comparison of oxidative thermokinetics between emulsion and microemulsion diesel fuel. Energy Conversion and Management 2015, 101, 364-370. (20) Guo, Z.; Wang, S.; Wang, X. Stability mechanism investigation of emulsion fuels from biomass pyrolysis oil and diesel. Energy 2014, 66, 250-255. (21) Ikura, M.; Stanciulescu, M.; Hogan, E. Emulsification of pyrolysis derived bio-oil in diesel fuel. Biomass & Bioenergy 2003, 24, (3), 221-232. (22) Shahir, S. A.; Masjuki, H. H.; Kalam, M. A.; Imran, A.; Fattah, I. M. R.; Sanjid, A. Feasibility of diesel–biodiesel–ethanol/bioethanol blend as existing CI engine fuel: An assessment of properties, material compatibility, safety and combustion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014, 32, 379-395. (23) Shahir, S. A.; Masjuki, H. H.; Kalam, M. A.; Imran, A.; Ashraful, A. M. Performance and emission assessment of diesel–biodiesel–ethanol/bioethanol blend as a fuel in diesel engines: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015, 48, 62-78. (24) Mohan, D.; Pittman, C. U., Jr.; Steele, P. H. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: A critical review. Energy & Fuels 2006, 20, (3), 848-889. (25) Klossek, M. L.; Marcus, J.; Touraud, D.; Kunz, W. The extension of microemulsion regions by combining ethanol with other cosurfactants. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2013, 427, 95-100. (26) Satgé De Caro, P.; Mouloungui, Z.; Vaitilingom, G.; Berge, J. C. Interest of combining an additive with diesel–ethanol blends for use in diesel engines. Fuel 2001, 80, (4), 565-574. (27) Fernando, S.; Hanna, M. Development of a Novel Biofuel Blend Using Ethanol-Biodiesel-Diesel Microemulsions: EB-Diesel. Energy & Fuels 2004, 44, (4), 1695-1703. (28) Arpornpong, N.; Attaphong, C.; Charoensaeng, A.; Sabatini, D. A.; Khaodhiar, S. Ethanol-in-palm oil/diesel microemulsion-based biofuel: Phase behavior, viscosity, and droplet size. Fuel 2014, 132, 101-106. (29) Do, L. D.; Singh, V.; Chen, L.; Kibbey, T. C. G.; Gollahalli, S. R.; Sabatini, D. A. Algae, Canola, or Palm Oils—Diesel Microemulsion Fuels: Phase Behaviors, Viscosity, and Combustion Properties. International Journal of Green Energy 2011, 8, (7), 748-767. (30) Kerihuel, A.; Senthilkumar, M.; Bellettre, J.; Tazerout, M. Ethanol animal fat emulsions as a diesel engine fuel – Part 1: Formulations and influential parameters. Fuel 2006, 85, (17-18), 2640-2645. 22


Page 22 of 35

Page 23 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508

(31) Li, D.-g.; Zhen, H.; Xingcai, L.; Wu-gao, Z.; Jian-guang, Y. Physico-chemical properties of ethanol–diesel blend fuel and its effect on performance and emissions of diesel engines. Renewable Energy 2005, 30, (6), 967-976. (32) Chang, Y.-C.; Lee, W.-J.; Lin, S.-L.; Wang, L.-C. Green energy: Water-containing acetone–butanol–ethanol diesel blends fueled in diesel engines. Applied Energy 2013, 109, 182-191. (33) Lee, W.-J.; Liu, Y.-C.; Mwangi, F. K.; Chen, W.-H.; Lin, S.-L.; Fukushima, Y.; Liao, C.-N.; Wang, L.-C. Assessment of energy performance and air pollutant emissions in a diesel engine generator fueled with water-containing ethanol–biodiesel–diesel blend of fuels. Energy 2011, 36, (9), 5591-5599. (34) Chiaramonti, D.; Bonini, M.; Fratini, E.; Tondi, G.; Gartner, K.; Bridgwater, A. V.; Grimm, H. P.; Soldaini, I.; Webster, A.; Baglioni, P. Development of emulsions from biomass pyrolysis liquid and diesel and their use in engines—Part 1 : emulsion production. Biomass and Bioenergy 2003, 25, (1), 85-99. (35) Martin, J. A.; Mullen, C. A.; Boateng, A. A. Maximizing the Stability of Pyrolysis Oil/Diesel Fuel Emulsions. Energy & Fuels 2014, 28, (9), 5918-5929. (36) Wang, X.-l.; Yuan, X.-z.; Huang, H.-j.; Leng, L.-j.; Li, H.; Peng, X.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, G.-m. Study on the solubilization capacity of bio-oil in diesel by microemulsion technology with Span80 as surfactant. Fuel Processing Technology 2014, 118, 141-147. (37) Zhong, H.; Yang, L.; Zeng, G.; Brusseau, M. L.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, X.; Tan, F. Aggregate-based sub-CMC Solubilization of Hexadecane by Surfactants. RSC advances 2015, 5, (95), 78142-78149. (38) Chiappisi, L.; Noirez, L.; Gradzielski, M. A journey through the phase diagram of a pharmaceutically relevant microemulsion system. Journal of colloid and interface science 2016, 473, 52-59. (39) Wang, F.; Fang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Y. The effect of alkanol chain on the interfacial composition and thermodynamic properties of diesel oil microemulsion. Fuel 2008, 87, (12), 2517-2522. (40) No, S.-Y. Application of bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass to transportation, heat and power generation—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014, 40, 1108-1125. (41) Nguyen, D.; Honnery, D. Combustion of bio-oil ethanol blends at elevated pressure. Fuel 2008, 87, (2), 232-243. (42) Demirbas, A. Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass. Applied Energy 2011, 88, (1), 17-28. (43) Bardhan, S.; Kundu, K.; Saha, S. K.; Paul, B. K. Effects of water content and oil on physicochemical and microenvironmental properties of mixed surfactant microemulsions. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2014, 450, 130-140. (44) Mathis, U.; Mohr, M.; Kaegi, R.; Bertola, A.; Boulouchos, K. Influence of Diesel Engine Combustion Parameters on Primary Soot Particle Diameter. Environmental Science and Technology 2005, 39, (6), 1887-1892. 23


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551

(45) Hoon Song, K.; Nag, P.; Litzinger, T. A.; Haworth, D. C. Effects of oxygenated additives on aromatic species in fuel-rich, premixed ethane combustion: a modeling study. Combustion and Flame 2003, 135, (3), 341-349. (46) Husnawan, M.; Masjuki, H. H.; Mahlia, T. M. I.; Saifullah, M. G. Thermal analysis of cylinder head carbon deposits from single cylinder diesel engine fueled by palm oil–diesel fuel emulsions. Applied Energy 2009, 86, (10), 2107-2113. (47) Conconi, C. C.; Crnkovic, P. M. Thermal behavior of renewable diesel from sugar cane, biodiesel, fossil diesel and their blends. Fuel Processing Technology 2013, 114, 6-11. (48) Wan Nik, W. B.; Ani, F. N.; Masjuki, H. H. Thermal stability evaluation of palm oil as energy transport media. Energy Conversion and Management 2005, 46, (13-14), 2198-2215. (49) Crnkovic, P. M.; Koch, C.; Ávila, I.; Mortari, D. A.; Cordoba, A. M.; Moreira dos Santos, A. Determination of the activation energies of beef tallow and crude glycerin combustion using thermogravimetry. Biomass and Bioenergy 2012, 44, 8-16. (50) Kok, M. V. Clay concentration and heating rate effect on crude oil combustion by thermogravimetry. Fuel Processing Technology 2012, 96, 134-139. (51) Kumar, S.; Cho, J. H.; Park, J.; Moon, I. Advances in diesel–alcohol blends and their effects on the performance and emissions of diesel engines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2013, 22, 46-72. (52) Bera, A.; Ojha, K.; Kumar, T.; Mandal, A. Water solubilization capacity, interfacial compositions and thermodynamic parameters of anionic and cationic microemulsions. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2012, 404, 70-77. (53) Fernando, S.; Hanna, M. Development of a novel biofuel blend using ethanol-biodiesel-diesel microemulsions: EB-diesel. Energy & Fuels 2004, 18, (6), 1695-1703. (54) Barth, A.; Prevost, S.; Popig, J.; Dzionara, M.; Hedicke, G.; Gradzielski, M. Solubilisation of different medium chain esters in zwitterionic surfactant solutions--effects on phase behaviour and structure. Journal of colloid and interface science 2011, 364, (1), 148-56. (55) Kaur, G.; Chiappisi, L.; Prevost, S.; Schweins, R.; Gradzielski, M.; Mehta, S. K. Probing the microstructure of nonionic microemulsions with ethyl oleate by viscosity, ROESY, DLS, SANS, and cyclic voltammetry. Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids 2012, 28, (29), 10640-52. (56) Acosta, E. J.; Harwell, J. H.; Sabatini, D. A. Self-assembly in linker-modified microemulsions. Journal of colloid and interface science 2004, 274, (2), 652-64. (57) Acosta, E.; Tran, S.; Uchiyama, H.; Sabatini, D. A.; Harwell, J. H. Formulating chlorinated hydrocarbon microemulsions using linker molecules. Environmental science & technology 2002, 36, (21), 4618-4624. (58) Acosta, E.; Uchiyama, H.; Sabatini, D. a.; Harwell, J. H. The role of hydrophilic linkers. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents 2002, 5, (2), 151-157. (59) Kibbey, T. C. G.; Chen, L.; Do, L. D.; Sabatini, D. A. Predicting the 24


Page 24 of 35

Page 25 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

552 553 554 555 556 557

temperature-dependent viscosity of vegetable oil/diesel reverse microemulsion fuels. Fuel 2014, 116, 432-437. (60) Lin, Y.-S.; Lin, H.-P. Study on the spray characteristics of methyl esters from waste cooking oil at elevated temperature. Renewable Energy 2010, 35, (9), 1900-1907.

25


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 26 of 35

Table 1. Elemental analysis Elemental composition (wt. %)

Diesel

BEMB

BDMB

Bio-oil

C (wt.%)

77.92

69.69

73.79

65.14

H (wt.%)

11.66

9.77

10.39

8.79

O (wt.%)

10.02

19.14

14.33

19.17

N (wt.%)

0.40

1.40

1.49

6.90

H/C

1.80

1.68

1.69

1.62

O/C

0.10

0.21

0.15

0.22

26


Page 27 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

Table 2. The decomposition characteristics and activation energy of samples Diesel

M1

M2

BEMB

BDMB

Bio-oil

Span 80

DTGmax (mg/min)

0.58

0.37

0.36

0.26

0.31

0.44

0.42

Tmax (oC)

201

178

183

177

181

229

388

Activation energy (kJ/mol)

42.64

36.43

38.30

36.65

38.66

47.48

45.52

Tmax: the temperature where DTGmax occurs.

27


a

0.9070 6.98

Density (g/cm3, 25 oC) 1.1674 Viscosity (cSt, 40 oC)

28


6.70

0.1601

0.155

Sediment

Carbon residue (wt.%)

Sulfur content (wt.%)

TAN (mg KOH/g)

Stability

Sediment

0.084

0.0255

The maximum mass percentage set by GB 252-2011 (China).

(Obtained in 90 days)

-11

1

Pour point (oC)

1.04

42.97

Calorific value (MJ/kg) 37.00

266.84

BDMB

Bio-oil

Type of fuel

nor separation

Neither sediment

0.122

0.0242

0.56

-18

41.50

4.17

0.8885

BEMB

-

0.059

< 0.035 a

< 0.3 a

-12

45.73

3.13

0.8515

Diesel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Table 3. Fuel properties of samples

Energy & Fuels Page 28 of 35

Page 29 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

558

Graphical abstract

559 560 561

562 563 564 565 566 567

29


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

568 569 570

Fig. 1. Effect of surfactant concentration on bio-oil solubilization capacity of

571

microemulsion. N-octanol acted as co-surfactant and C/S ratio was 0.9. The volume of

572

200° proof ethanol was 1.0 mL.

30


Page 30 of 35

Page 31 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

573 574 575

Fig. 2. Effect of co-surfactant type and C/S ratio on bio-oil solubilizaion capacity of

576

microemulsion. The C/S ratio (w/w) ranged from 0 to 1.5. The concentration of Span

577

80 and volume of 200° proof ethanol were fixed at 0.30 M and 1.0 mL, respectively.

31


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

578 579 580

Fig. 3. Effect of polar phase: (a) Effect of polar phase type on phase behavior of

581

bio-oil hybrid bio-fuel; (Each polar phase volume was 1.0 mL to better clarify the

582

effect of ethanol.) (b) Effect of polar phase type on bio-oil solubilization capacity of

583

microemulsion; (Each polar phase volume was 0.1 mL because excess water could not

584

be dissolved completely thus cannot get microemulsion.) (c) Effect of ethanol volume

585

on bio-oil solubilization capacity of microemulsion. The concentration of Span 80 and

586

C/S ratio were 0.30 M and 0.9, respectively. N-octanol was co-surfactant.

32


Page 32 of 35

Page 33 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

587 588

Fig. 4. Distribution characterization: (a) Distribution of compounds in bio-oil; (b)

589

Distribution of bio-oil compounds in total solubilized bio-oil after

590

microemulsification; (The percentage was got through dividing the peak area of each

591

kind of bio-oil compound by total peak area of solubilized bio-oil in BEMB/BDMB.)

592

(c) Distribution change of bio-oil compounds between bio-oil and BEMB/BDMB

593

after microemulsification. (The ratio of each bio-oil compound proportion in total

594

solubilized bio-oil dissolved in BEMB/BDMB to that of the same compound in

595

liquefaction bio-oil represents distribution change. e.g. DC (A) represents the

596

distribution change of compound A, Percentage A in (a/b) represents the percentage

597

value of A in Fig. 4(a/b). DC (A) =

Percentage A in (b) × 100% ) Percentage A in (a) 33


Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

598 599 600

Fig. 5. Reverse micelle structure and solubilization of hydrophilic and hydrophobic

601

components: (a) The structure of reverse micelle microemulsion; (b) Hydrophilic

602

components of bio-oil were solubilized in hydrophilic core with some solubilization

603

of hydrophobic and amphiphilic components; (c) Hydrophobic components of bio-oil

604

were solubilized in hydrophobic oil phase.

605 606 607 608

34


Page 34 of 35

Page 35 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

609 610 611

Fig. 6. Solubilization of amphiphilic components: (a) Amphiphilic components of

612

bio-oil captured free surfactant molecules to form new reverse micelles; (b)

613

Interaction of amphiphilic components of bio-oil with the established reverse micelles;

614

(c) Self-assembly of linker molecules derived from bio-oil.

35


Upgrading sewage sludge liquefaction bio-oil by microemulsification

Recommend Documents