Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE LIBRARIES
Article
Volatile Methylsiloxanes and Organophosphate Esters in the Eggs of European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and Congeneric Gull Species from Locations across Canada Zhe Lu, Pamela A. Martin, Neil M. Burgess, Louise Champoux, John E. Elliott, Enzo Baressi, Amila O. De Silva, Shane de Solla, and Robert J. Letcher Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03192 • Publication Date (Web): 03 Aug 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 11, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Volatile Methylsiloxanes and Organophosphate Esters in the Eggs of European Starlings
2
(Sturnus vulgaris) and Congeneric Gull Species from Locations across Canada
3
Zhe Lu,† Pamela A. Martin, #* Neil M. Burgess,∥ Louise Champoux,⊥ John E. Elliott,∇ Enzo Baressi, ◊
4
Amila O. De Silva,† Shane R. de Solla, # Robert J. Letcher ¥*
5 6
†
7
Ontario, L7S 1A1 Canada
8
#
9
Ontario, L7S 1A1 Canada
Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington,
Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington,
10
∥
11
Newfoundland and Labrador, A1N 4T3 Canada
12
⊥
13
Québec, G1J 0C3 Canada
14
∇
15
Wildlife Research Centre, Delta, British Columbia, V4K 3Y3 Canada
16
◊
17
Ontario, L7S 1A1 Canada
18
¥
19
Wildlife Research Centre, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0H3 Canada
Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Mount Pearl,
Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Québec City,
Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Pacific
National Laboratory of Environmental Testing, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington,
Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National
20 21
*
22
Robert J. Letcher (Tel.: +1-613-998-6696; e-mail:
[email protected])
23
Pamela Martin (Tel.: +1-905-336-4879; e-mail:
[email protected])
Co-corresponding authors:
24 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
25
Page 2 of 30
ABSTRACT
26
Volatile methylsiloxanes (VMSs) and organophosphate esters (OPEs) are two suites of chemicals
27
that are of environmental concern as organic contaminants, but little is known about the exposure of
28
wildlife to these contaminants, particularly in birds, in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The present
29
study investigates the spatial distributions of nine cyclic and linear VMSs and seventeen OPEs in the
30
eggs of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), and three congeneric gull species (i.e., herring gull
31
(Larus argentatus), glaucous-winged gull (L. glaucescens) and California gull (L. californicus)) from
32
nesting sites across Canada. ∑VMS concentrations for all bird eggs were dominated by
33
decamethylcyclopentasiloxane
34
octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4). With European starlings, birds breeding adjacent to landfill sites
35
had eggs containing significantly greater ∑VMS concentrations (median: 178 ng g-1 wet weight (ww))
36
compared with those from the urban industrial (20 ng g-1 ww) and rural sites (1.3 ng g-1 ww), indicating
37
that the landfills are important sources of VMSs to Canadian terrestrial environments. In gull eggs, the
38
median ∑VMS concentrations were up to 254 ng g-1 ww and suggested greater detection frequencies
39
and levels of VMSs in aquatic- versus terrestrial-feeding birds in Canada. In contrast, the detection
40
frequency of OPEs in all European starling and gull eggs was lower than 16 %. This suggested low
41
dietary exposure and/or rapid metabolism of accumulated OPEs occurs in aquatic feeding birds and
42
may warrant further investigation to elucidate the reasons for these differences.
(D5),
dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane
43
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
(D6)
and
Page 3 of 30
44
Environmental Science & Technology
INTRODUCTION
45
Volatile methylsiloxanes (VMSs) and organophosphate esters (OPEs) are organic compounds of
46
great environmental concern.1-4 VMSs are produced at up to several million tonnes per year globally1
47
and widely used in the manufacture of consumer and industrial products such as silicone polymers,
48
cosmetics, personal care products, defoamers, adhesives, coatings, dry cleaning solvents and industrial
49
cleaning products.1,5,6 Halogenated and non-halogenated OPEs have been used for several decades in
50
consumer and industrial products such as plastics, textiles, electronics and building materials as flame
51
retardants and plasticizers.2,3 The worldwide production of OPEs in 2007 was estimated to be about
52
341000 tonnes,3 indicating that these compounds are produced and utilized in large volumes. As flame
53
retardants, the production and use of OPEs have increased during recent years to replace the banned
54
polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs).2,3,7
55
Based on the physicochemical properties (Table S1) and use-pattern of VMSs and OPEs, these
56
chemicals may easily enter the environment during manufacture, application, and waste disposal
57
processes. These compounds can volatilize to the atmosphere from VMS-containing solid and liquid
58
waste.1,6,8 OPEs can leach into the environment from consumer products because they are usually not
59
chemically bound to the materials.2,9 It has been estimated that about 40 % of tris(2-chloroisopropyl)
60
phosphate (TCIPP) and 10 % of tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCIPP) can be released into
61
the environment throughout the lifetime of a given product.10,11 As a consequence, OPE and VMS
62
contaminants have been detected in many environmental samples such as surface water,12,13
63
wastewater,6,13 biosolids,6 sediment13 and air.7,8,14,15
64
Organisms may accumulate VMSs and OPEs via respiration, dermal exposure, and ingestion. The
65
accumulation of these contaminants may lead to adverse effects in organisms, including endocrine
66
disruption, carcinogenicity, developmental deformity, neurotoxicity, and dermal, liver and reproductive
67
toxicities.1-3 In peer-reviewed literature, the occurrence of VMSs and OPEs have been reported for
68
some aquatic organisms such as plankton,16,17 invertebrate,16 and fish.4,16-18 However, the propensity for 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 4 of 30
69
bioaccumulation of these contaminants in terrestrially foraging wildlife is unknown. It is also not clear
70
if there are any differences in contamination patterns of VMSs and OPEs between aquatic and
71
terrestrial wildlife. In addition, landfills have been suggested as major sources of brominated flame
72
retardants such as PBDEs, to terrestrial ecosystems;19 but landfills as a source of VMS and OPE
73
exposure to terrestrial wildlife is unclear. VMSs and OPEs have been detected at much higher
74
concentrations than that of PBDEs in some environmental matrices.6,20,21 Thus, it is essential to identify
75
the sources of VMSs and OPEs in the environment. It has been estimated that about 26 million tonnes
76
(777 kg per capita) of municipal solid waste was generated in 2008 in Canada.19,22 A variety of solid
77
waste types such as the containers of personal care products and cosmetics, car polish/wax, as well as
78
furniture, plastics and electronics, which have been shown to contain VMSs and OPEs1,2 are disposed
79
in landfills. These contaminants may escape from landfill waste and enter the environment via
80
volatilization, as leachate and/or via landfill diversion (e.g., biological treatment).
81
To better understand the exposure and environmental fate of VMSs and OPEs in wildlife, the
82
present study investigated the concentration and composition profiles of these contaminants in
83
terrestrial and aquatic bird eggs from nesting locations across Canada. The birds selected for this study
84
included European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), as well as herring gulls (Larus argentatus) and two
85
congeneric species, glaucous-winged gulls (L. glaucescens) and California gulls (L. californicus).
86
European starlings are terrestrial birds and live in habitats close to human activities (e.g., urban, landfill
87
sites and farmland).19,23 They mainly feed on insects, spiders, seeds, grains, fruit, livestock feed and
88
food waste.19,23 These properties render them ideal species for monitoring how human activities affect
89
contamination by VMSs and OPEs in terrestrial ecosystems.24 As top predators, herring gulls have been
90
used for many years in the spatial and temporal monitoring of environmental pollution in aquatic
91
ecosystems.25 Recently, glaucous-winged gulls have been shown to be an effective contaminant
92
indicator in marine environments.26,27 In the present study, we investigated (1) the concentrations,
93
compositions and spatial variations of VMSs and OPEs in bird eggs collected from locations across 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
94
Canada; (2) the hypothesis that landfills are an important source of VMSs and OPEs to the terrestrial
95
environment; and (3) the different contamination patterns existing between terrestrial and aquatic birds.
96
To our knowledge, the study of VMSs and OPEs in European starling eggs represents the first
97
investigation of these substances in any terrestrial wildlife.
98 99
MATERIALS AND METHODS
100
Samples. The bird eggs used in this study were stored and archived in Environment and Climate
101
Change Canada’s National Wildlife Specimen Bank (Ottawa, ON, Canada). Fresh European starling
102
eggs were collected in April/May in 2013 and 2014 from nest boxes established in 19 sampling sites
103
with three different land use types: urban industrial centers (industrial districts in major cities), landfills
104
(adjacent to the major cities), and rural (agricultural) sites located either 10 km (only for OPEs study)
105
or 40 km upwind from the major cities26 in Canada. The cities selected for this study included
106
Vancouver, British Columbia (BC); Calgary, Alberta (AB); Hamilton, Ontario (ON); Montréal, Québec
107
(QC) and Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS) (Figure S1). The reference site was selected to be at Redcliff (AB),
108
which is about 300 km from Calgary (AB) (Figure S1). For each location, a maximum of 9 European
109
starling eggs was pooled on an equal wet weight (ww) basis of the individual eggs.19 The pools were
110
used to create egg homogenates and stored at -40 ºC prior to chemical analysis.19 European starling
111
eggs were collected using methods approved by the Environment Canada Animal Care Committee, and
112
a total of n = 71 and n = 101 European starling egg homogenate samples were analyzed for VMSs and
113
OPEs, respectively.
114
Fresh gull eggs were collected from late April to July in 2011 and 2013 from a total of 14 gull
115
colonies across Canada (Figure S1). The egg samples were collected from 3 gull species, including
116
glaucous-winged gulls from BC, California gull from AB and herring gulls from the remaining
117
sampling locations. Gull eggs were collected under Canadian federal scientific permits. The sampling 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 6 of 30
118
sites (Figure S1) included: Cleland Island (site BC1), Mitlenatch Island (site BC2) and Mandarte Island
119
(site BC3) from BC; Dalmead (site AB4) from AB; Great Slave Lake (site NT5) from Northwest
120
Territories (NT); Pipestone Rocks (site MB6) from Manitoba (MB); Southampton Island (site NU7)
121
from Nunavut (NU); Agawa Rock (site ON8), Hamilton Harbour (site ON9, only analyzed for VMSs)
122
and Tommy Thompson Park (site ON10) from ON; Ile Deslauriers (site QC11) and Ile Bellechasse
123
(site QC12) from QC; Kent Island (site NB13) from New Brunswick (NB); and Gull Island (site NL14)
124
from Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). For each location, a maximum of 10 gull eggs was pooled on
125
an equal ww basis of the individual eggs.25 The pools were used to create egg homogenates and stored
126
at -40 ºC prior to chemical analysis. 25 A total of n = 99 and n = 114 gull egg homogenate samples were
127
analyzed for VMSs and OPEs, respectively.
128
Chemicals and reagents. The structures of target compounds are shown in Figure S2.
129
Hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane (D3; CAS# 541-05-9; purity > 98 %), octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4;
130
CAS# 556-67-2; purity > 98 %), decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5; CAS# 541-02-6; purity > 98 %),
131
dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6; CAS# 540-97-6; purity > 98 %), Tetrakis(trimethylsiloxy)silane
132
(M4Q; CAS# 3555-47-3; purity > 95 %), hexamethyldisiloxane (L2; CAS# 107-46-0; purity > 99 %),
133
octamethyltrisiloxane (L3; CAS# 107-51-7; purity > 97 %), decamethyltetrasiloxane (L4; CAS# 141-
134
62-8; purity > 95 %) and dodecamethylpentasiloxane (L5; CAS# 141-63-9; purity > 95 %) were
135
purchased from Gelest Inc. (Philadelphia, PA). Isotopically labeled VMS surrogate standards (Table S2)
136
were purchased from Moravek (purity > 98 %; Brea, CA., U.S.A). For OPEs, triethyl phosphate (TEP;
137
CAS# 78-40-0; purity > 99%), tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP; CAS#115-96-8; purity > 97%),
138
tripropyl phosphate (TPP; CAS# 513-08-6; purity > 99%), triphenyl phosphate (TPHP; CAS# 115-86-6;
139
purity > 99 %), tris (2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate (TDBPP; CAS# 126-72-7; purity > 99 %), tributyl
140
phosphate (TNBP; CAS# 126-73-8; purity > 99 %), trimethylphenyl phosphate (TMPP; CAS# 1330-
141
78-5; purity > 98 %), tris (2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBOEP; CAS# 78-51-3; purity > 94 %), 2-
142
ethylhexyl-diphenyl phosphate (EHDPP; CAS# 1241-94-7; purity > 98 %) and tris (2-ethylhexyl) 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
143
phosphate (TEHP; CAS# 78-42-2; purity > 99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON,
144
Canada). TCIPP (CAS# 13674-84-5; purity > 99%), TDCIPP (CAS# 13674-87-8; purity > 95%) and
145
tris(tribromoneopentyl) phosphate (TTBNPP; CAS# 19186-97-1; purity > 98 %) were purchased from
146
Pfaltz & Bauer (Waterbury, CT, USA), TCI America (Portland, OR, USA) and Accustandard (New
147
Haven, CT, USA), respectively. Tris (2-bromo-4-methylphenyl) phosphate (T2B4MP), tris (3-bromo-
148
4-methylphenyl) phosphate (T3B4MP) and tris (4-bromo-3-methylphenyl) phosphate (T4B3MP) were
149
synthesized by GL Chemtec International, (Oakville, ON, Canada) (purity > 98 %). The standard of
150
2,2-bis(chloromethyl)propane-1,3-diyl
151
obtained from Dr. Heather Stapleton at Duke University (purity > 97 %). Isotopically labeled OPE
152
surrogate standards (Table S3) were purchased from Wellington Laboratories Inc. (Guelph, ON,
153
Canada) (purity > 98 %). Solvents such as hexane, dichloromethane and methanol (CHROMASOLV®
154
Plus grade) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Diatomaceous earth (J.T. Baker, NJ, USA) and
155
sodium sulphate (Na2SO4) were heated at 600 ºC overnight in a muffle furnace prior to use. ISOLUTE
156
aminopropyl silica gel was purchased from Biotage (Charlotte, NC, USA).
tetrakis(2-chloroethyl)bis(phosphate)
(BCMP-BCEP)
was
157
Sample preparation and chemical analysis. Egg sample preparation and sample extraction and
158
instrumental analysis methods have been extensively described elsewhere.4,25,28,29 However, the
159
procedures are also detailed in the supplemental information (SI). Analysis of VMSs were carried out
160
in the National Laboratory of Environmental Testing (NLET) (ultraclean lab) at the Canada Centre for
161
Inland Waters, Burlington, ON, Canada. All OPE analyses were carried out in the Organics
162
Contaminants Research Laboratory/Letcher Labs at the National Wildlife Research Centre (NWRC),
163
Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. The instrumental parameters (i.e, gas chromatograph-mass
164
spectrometry (GC-MS) for VMS analysis and liquid chromatograph-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-
165
MS-MS) for OPE analysis) are shown in Tables S2-S5.
166
QA/QC. Unlike other biotic tissue or body compartment samples, bird egg contents are protected
167
by the egg shell from any possible field sampling and handling contamination of the contents. In the 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 8 of 30
168
Sampling personnel wore clean gloves during egg sample collection and refrained from using personal
169
care products to avoid possible contamination of VMSs. An experiment was conducted to test the
170
possible VMS contamination during sample storage and transportation. Organic chicken egg
171
homogenates (n = 9, homogenized at 9am (n = 3), noon (n = 3) and 3pm (n = 3)), organic chicken egg
172
(n = 3, with shell) and Lake Superior gull egg homogenates (n = 6) (collected in 2012) were stored in
173
clean glass containers and shipped from Ottawa (ON, Canada) to Burlington (ON, Canada) (about 500
174
km). Then, the egg samples were processed and analyzed in both NWRC and the ultraclean lab in
175
NLET. The results showed that there was no significant background contamination occurred during
176
storage and transportation for the target VMSs (Details are shown in the SI and Figure S3).
177
Glass materials were used in the experiment whenever possible to limit any possible background
178
organic contamination. All glassware and aluminum foil was cleaned, solvent rinsed and heated at
179
450°C overnight before use to remove any possible background contamination. The outside of the egg
180
shell was rinsed by solvent before accessing and retrieving the egg content. Three procedural blanks
181
and one spike-recovery sample (known amount of target compounds added to 1 g of homogenized
182
chicken egg) were included for the OPE analysis of all European starling eggs (10 batches). For all
183
VMS and OPE analysis and measurement in the gull eggs, one procedural blank and one spike-
184
recovery sample were included in each sample batch (VMSs: 9 batches for gulls, 7 batches for
185
European starlings; OPEs: 8 batches for gulls). The concentrations of target compounds in blanks are
186
listed in Tables S6 and S7.
187
The recovery of the target compounds in spike-recovery samples were 65 ± 16 % and 73 ± 20 %
188
(mean ± standard deviation (SD)) for all VMSs and OPEs, respectively. The recovery of the surrogate
189
standards in egg samples were 64 ± 21 % for all VMSs and 79 ± 18 % for all OPEs (mean ± SD). The
190
method limits of detection (MLODs) were defined as the concentration which produces a peak with
191
signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of 3. The method limits of quantification (MLOQs) were based on 3 times of
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
192
SD of the procedural blanks. For analytes which were not detectable in the method blanks, standard
193
concentrations producing a signal with 10 times S/N ratio in solvent were used to estimate the MLOQs.
194
The MLODs and MLOQs for target compounds are shown in Tables S2, S3 and S5.
195
For VMS analysis in all eggs and OPE analysis in gull eggs, the samples were corrected using the
196
individual blank in each batch. For OPE analysis in European starling eggs, the samples were corrected
197
using the highest concentration of three blanks + 1 standard deviation in each batch. Method
198
performance for VMS was assessed by analyzing a reference material (fish tissue sample) with known
199
concentrations of D4, D5 and D6 (prepared and used in previous studies) in 7 different batches.4,30 In
200
the present study, the measured concentrations of D4, D5 and D6 in the reference material were 75 ±
201
11 %, 77 ± 13 % and 76 ± 13 % (mean ± SD) of the expected values, respectively.
202
Data Analysis. The data was statistically analyzed to determine the existence of possible
203
differences in VMS and OPE levels in eggs collected from difference sites and between difference bird
204
species. The statistical analysis of the was performed using RStudio V 0.99.903 (Boston, MA, USA)
205
and GraphPad Prism 7.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA) software. Statistics for data with censored values (≤ 50 %
206
censoring and detects > 3) were conducted using the robust regression on order statistics (ROS) method
207
in RStudio by the Nondetects and Data Analysis (NADA) package (V1.5-6).31 For the sampling sites
208
with small sample size (n ≤ 4), the censored values were substituted by 1/2 MLOQ when contaminants
209
with detection frequency ≥ 50 %.31 Non-normally distributed data (Shapiro-Wilk test) were
210
logarithmically transformed to approximate a normal distribution before being subjected to statistical
211
analysis. Unpaired two-tailed t-tests with Welch’s correction or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s
212
multiple comparison test were used for the data comparison analysis. Significance level was set as p
herring gull eggs > glaucous-winged gull eggs. For example, the median concentration of
292
∑VMSs in the eggs of California gull, herring gull and glaucous-winged gull in the present study was
293
254, 110 and 56 ng g-1 ww, respectively (Figure S5). Since we do not have the egg samples of different
294
species from same sampling site, it is difficult to interpret this distribution pattern with species. The
295
VMS contamination status of their habitat and differences in feeding ecology and trophic transfer of
296
VMSs are possible factors affecting the observed distribution variations. Glaucous-winged gulls from
297
BC live in the marine environments,26,27 whereas California and herring gulls mainly feed and breed
298
inland. The aquatic birds from marine environment (e.g., seabirds from Europe or glaucous-winged
299
gulls) generally showed lower levels of VMSs compared to inland aquatic birds. Recent studies showed
300
different bioaccumulation results of VMS,16,17 depending on studied locations. For example, the
301
biodilution of VMS in marine food web has been observed in Tokyo Bay (Japan),42 which was in
302
contrast to the biomagnification in inland water foodweb.16,17 While it is also possible that in gulls there
303
are species-specific biotransformation/distribution processes influencing these compounds, such
304
knowledge is not currently available and need to be addressed in future studies.
305
The gull eggs collected from AB (254 ng g-1 ww), NL (184 ng g-1 ww) and QC (162 ng g-1 ww)
306
showed greater median ∑VMS concentrations compared with other provinces (median range: 8 - 118
307
ng g-1 ww) (Table 2, Figure S6). The lowest ∑VMS concentration was detected in the eggs from the
308
NU site which is the most northern and remote site in the present study (Figure 3). Similar spatial
309
distribution pattern was observed for the individual congeners, D5 and D6 (Figure S6). The difference
310
observed in ΣVMS concentrations between herring gull eggs from Gull (NB) and Kent (NL) Islands in
13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 14 of 30
311
Atlantic Canada (Table 2, Figures 3 and S6) may be related to the use of landfills by breeding gulls.
312
Herring gulls from Gull Island (NL) were found at nearby landfills 30 times more often than herring
313
gulls from Kent Island (NB) in Global Positioning System (GPS) telemetry studies of their movements
314
during breeding seasons from 2014-2016 (K. Shlepr, R. Ronconi & D. Fifield, unpublished data). This
315
supports our findings from European starling eggs that landfills are important sources of VMSs to the
316
Canadian environment.
317
Figure S7 illustrates the comparisons of VMS concentrations in the gull and European starling
318
eggs in BC, AB and ON. In BC, the VMS concentrations decreased in the following order: landfill site
319
European starling eggs > gull eggs > rural site European starling eggs. In contrast, different distribution
320
patterns were observed in AB and ON. That is, the gull eggs show higher or similar concentration
321
compared with the landfill and urban/industrial European starling eggs, but much higher than that of
322
the rural site European starling eggs (Figure S7). Since the sampling site of gull eggs were generally far
323
from point sources (e.g., landfills, urban/industrial area) of the target contaminants, these results
324
suggest
325
contamination/accumulation levels of VMSs compared with the terrestrial birds/ecosystems. The
326
potential biomagnification of VMS in aquatic food web is one possible explanation for the high
327
concentrations of VMS observed in the gull eggs,16,17 while it is also possible that VMSs have different
328
biotransformation and/or maternal transfer processes in gulls and European starlings. The related
329
mechanisms are worth further investigation.
that
the
aquatic
birds/ecosystems
in
Canada
may
experience
greater
330
OPEs contamination in European starling and gull eggs. Tables S9 and S10 present the
331
concentrations of OPEs in European starling and gull eggs from nesting locations across Canada,
332
respectively. The 10 OPEs detected in bird eggs were: TEP (this compound was only detected in gull
333
eggs), TCEP, TCIPP, TPHP, TDCIPP, TNBP, TMPP (this compound was only detected in European
334
starling eggs), TBOEP, EHDPP, and TEHP (this compound was only detected in one European starling
335
egg). However, the detection frequencies were all below 16 % for the 10 detected OPEs in the current 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
336
study, indicating low contamination/bioaccumulation potential of these contaminants in Canadian
337
European starlings and gulls. The detection of OPEs have been reported in some aquatic biota samples
338
in Great Lakes (Table S11), 25, 29 with mean concentrations of individual OPE generally lower than 10
339
ng g-1 ww in bird eggs or tissues, which is consistent with the present study. Since OPEs have been
340
frequently detected in abiotic environmental samples with relatively high concentrations (e.g., up to 47
341
µg m-3 in air, 24 mg kg-1 in sediment and 379 ng L-1 in surface water),2 the low levels of OPEs in the
342
present bird eggs may be attributed to the rapid metabolism of OPEs in biota.3,29,43 For example, Farhat
343
et al.9 injected TCIPP and TDCIPP in fertilized chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) eggs and detected