Water- and Fertilizer-Integrated Hydrogel Derived from the

Subscriber access provided by Kaohsiung Medical University

Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry

Water and fertilizer integrated hydrogel derived from the polymerization of acrylic acid and urea as a slow release N fertilizer and water retention in agriculture Dongdong Cheng, Yan Liu, Guiting Yang, and Aiping Zhang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00872 • Publication Date (Web): 21 May 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 21, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Water and fertilizer integrated hydrogel derived from the polymerization of

2

acrylic acid and urea as a slow release N fertilizer and water retention in

3

agriculture

4

Authors: Dongdong Cheng1,2,*, Yan Liu1, Guiting Yang1, Aiping Zhang3

5

Affiliations:

6

1

7

Resources, National Engineering & Technology Research Center for Slow and

8

Controlled Release Fertilizers, College of Resources and Environment, Shandong

9

Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong 271018, China

National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer

10

2

11

Kingenta Ecological Engineering Co., Ltd, Linyi, Shandong 276700, China

12

3

13

of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China

State Key Laboratory of Nutrition Resources Integrated Utilization, Shandong

Institute of agricultural environment and sustainable development, Chinese Academy

14 15

*Corresponding authors: Dongdong Cheng

16

Telephone: +86-538-8241531

17

E-mail: [email protected]

18 19 20 21 22 1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


23

ABSTRACT:

24

To reduce the preparation cost of superabsorbent and improve the N release rate at the

25

same time, a novel low cost superabsorbent (SA) with the function of N slow release

26

was prepared by chemical synthesis with neutralized acrylic acid (AA), urea,

27

potassium persulfate (KPS) and N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA). The influence

28

order of influence factors on water absorbency property was determined by

29

orthogonal L18(3)7 experiment. Based on the optimization results of orthogonal

30

experiment, the effects of single factor on the water absorption were investigated, and

31

the highest water absorbency (909 g/g) was achieved on the conditions: 1.0 mol/mol

32

urea to AA mole ratio, 100% of AA neutralized, K+, 1.5% KPS to AA mass fraction,

33

0.02% MBA to AA mass fraction, 45 oC reaction temperature and 4.0 h reaction time.

34

The optimal sample was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and

35

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Swelling behaviors of the

36

superabsorbent were investigated in distilled water, various soil and salt solution. The

37

water release kinetics of SA in different negative pressure and soil were

38

systematically investigated. Additionally, the maize seed germination in various types

39

of soil with different amount of SA was proposed, and the N could release 3.71% after

40

being incubated in distilled water for 40 days. After 192 h, the relative water content

41

of SA-treated sandy soil, loam and paddy soil was 42%, 56%, and 45%, respectively.

42

All the results in this work showed that SA had good water retention and N slow

43

release properties, which are expected to have potential application in sustainable

44

modern agriculture. 2


Page 2 of 39

Page 3 of 39


45

KEY WORDS: Integrated water and fertilizer; Superabsorbent; Urea; Acrylic acid

46 47

INTRODUCTION

48

Water is one of the main factors that improve the crop production. However, due to

49

rising water and irrigation costs, drought and water shortage have been puzzling the

50

world agricultural development. According to estimates, 84% of cultivated area in the

51

1 billion 440 million world’s arable land was dry cropland, the loss of agricultural

52

production caused by drought and water shortage every year in the world amounts to

53

more than the sum of the losses caused by other factors,1 hence it is important and

54

necessary to use water resource efficiently. In the past few years, the study of

55

superabsorbent (SA) as water management materials for agricultural and horticulture

56

applications has received increasing attention.2-4 Practical applications are also

57

indicated that superabsorbent polymer displays a promising future for the applications

58

of increasing the survival rate and simultaneously alleviating the drought stress effects

59

on the plants in arid and semi-arid areas.5-7

60

At the same time, nutrient is another important factor which limits the growth

61

and yield of crops.8 Nitrogen (N) is a key element in plant nutrition and greatly affects

62

the crop yield. However, the utilization rate of N-based fertilizer is relatively low, and

63

only about 30-50%.9 Inefficient nitrogen absorption increases farmers’ input costs and

64

brings many environmental problems. So it is a major challenge to improve the use

65

efficiency of nitrogen, to reduce farmers’ input costs, and to decrease the

66

environmental impact of N losses while to maintain the crop yield. These 3



67

shortcomings can be overcome by using the slow release fertilizer (SRFs), which

68

release fertilizers to plants gradually at a certain rate to coincide with the plant’s

69

nutritional requirement and reduce fertilizer loss simultaneously.10, 11 Water scarcity,

70

environmental pollution caused by excessive application of fertilizers, and the high

71

costs of irrigation and fertilizers, demand for greater increase than ever in grain yield

72

of crop with less water and less fertilizers in China.12 Thus, there is an increasing need

73

to develop water-saving and N-fertilizer efficient technologies for economical and

74

environment-friendly production of crop. The water-holding capacity and nutrient

75

retention of sandy soils can be improved via the combination of superabsorbent and

76

SRFs. The aeration and microbial activity of soil can be increased, the influence of

77

water-soluble fertilizers on the environmental will be mitigated, and the frequency of

78

irrigation can be lowered at the same time.13 Currently, the multifunctional slow

79

release fertilizer with water conservation and nutrient release is prepared by coating a

80

water absorbing resin in the out of the coated fertilizer. 14-16 However, the coating

81

process is limited by the surface characteristics of fertilizer granules, coating material

82

and production process, which is bound to result in complex processes, rising costs

83

and limiting their use in most high-value crops.17 Therefore, it is necessary to prepare

84

materials with retention and fertilizer release function from other ways. Chemical

85

reaction grafting is a simple material multifunctional method, if the graft reaction

86

between fertilizer and water absorbent will be carried out, it will solve the cost

87

problem caused by the expensive process and material.

88

Nowadays, most of super water absorbents (SA) are obtained by solution or 4


Page 4 of 39

Page 5 of 39


89

inverse-suspension polymerization techniques from acrylic acid, its salts, and

90

acrylamide (AM).18 The above raw materials are not only expensive, but the

91

acrylamide is harmful to human health.19 It is well known that superabsorbent can

92

absorb hundred times of its own weight because of the chemical or physical

93

crosslinkings of individual polymer chain.20-22 The highly water-absorptive polymer

94

possesses linear structure, which contains many strong water absorption groups

95

including -COO-, -OH, -NH2.21-23 Therefore, increasing the number of water

96

absorbent groups is an important way to increase the water absorption of a material.

97

Urea is a low-cost material with amide structure. It has excellent hydrophilicity and is

98

also a major source of crop nitrogen. The price of urea is just 1/10 to 1/15 that of

99

acrylic amide, showing potential application in water retention materials with nitrogen

100

sustained release function. However, urea is a hydrophilic substance with small

101

molecule that can be quickly dissolved in water. Therefore, it should be modified to

102

be employed as a high water absorbent resin. Herein, a low cost super absorbent

103

hydrogel (SA) was prepared by crosslinking reaction of acrylicacid (AA) and urea

104

with potassium sulfate and N,N’-methylenebis acrylamide (MBA) as initiator and

105

cross-linker. The synthetic conditions and properties of SA were studied to find out

106

the optimal synthesis parameters. This work not only innovated the theory and

107

method of “water and fertilizer integration”, but also achieved simultaneous slow

108

release of water and fertilizer, so as to achieve the goal of water and fertilizer

109

cooperation in farmland.

110

MATERIALS AND METHODS 5



111

Materials. Acrylic acid (AA, chemical purity, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd,

112

Shanghai, China) was used after vacuum distillation. Potassium persulfate (KPS) and

113

N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA, chemical purity, Tianjin Kermel Chemical

114

Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) were used as received. NaOH, KOH, and urea

115

(analytical grade, Tianjin yongda Chemical Co., Ltd., China) were used as received.

116

Other agents were all in analytical grade, and the solutions were prepared in distilled

117

water.

118

Preparation of superabsorbent. Figure 1 shows the schematic illusion of

119

preparation of the low cost superabsorbent. A series of superabsorbent with different

120

water absorption capacity were prepared as follows: Initially, 100 mL of AA was

121

neutralized with 20 wt% KOH or 20 wt% NaOH solution in a 1 L glass beaker under

122

ice bath condition and mixed thoroughly. Secondly, an appropriate amount of urea and

123

N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) were added in the beaker with stirring until

124

dissolved. After that, all the mixed solution was transferred into a 250 mL three-neck

125

flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, nitrogen line and reflux condenser. The

126

reactor was immersed in an oil bath. Before adding the initiator, the oxygen free

127

nitrogen gas was bubbled into the solution for 30 min. Then, an aqueous solution with

128

a certain amount of KPS was added. The oil bath was kept at a target temperature to

129

complete the polymerization process with a prescriptive reaction time. After reaction,

130

the product was dried to constant weight at 85 oC. All samples used for tests were

131

grind into particles with diameters between 40 and 70 mm.

132

Fig. 1…………………………………………………………. 6


Page 6 of 39

Page 7 of 39


133

Determination of water absorbency. A series of weighed dried samples (0.1±

134

0.0001 g) were immersed in over distilled water to achieve swelling equilibrium at

135

room temperature (about 30 min). Then, swollen samples (M2) were filtered through a

136

100-mesh nylon net and suspended for 10 min until there was no free water on the

137

surface. The equilibrium water absorbency (Qeq, g/g) was calculated according to the

138

following equation:

139

Qeq 

140

M 2  M1 M1

(1)

Where Qeq (g/g) is the water absorbency per gram of dried sample; M1 (g) and

141

M2 (g) are the weights of the dry and the swollen sample, respectively.

142

Measurement of water retention in different soil types. The three types of soils are

143

sandy loam, loam, paddy soil (Table1). 0.5 g of SA and 50 g of dry soil (below10

144

mesh) were fully mixed and placed in a plastic cup, and then 417 mL of distilled

145

water was slowly dripped into the beaker and weighed (W1). The controlled

146

experiment was also carried out (W2) without SA. The beaker was kept at 25 oC and

147

weighed (Wt) at selected time points (hours 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 168, 192). All the

148

water holding tests were conducted three times, and the average value was used for

149

plotting. The water retention (WR%) of soil was calculated from Equation (2):

150

WR% 

Wt  W2  100% W1  W2

(2)

151

Where WR% is the soil water retention; W1 and Wt are the total mass of 0.5 g SA,

152

soil, plastic cup and water content of the different treatment before and after soil

153

culture, respectively, and W2 is the total mass of the control (no SA). 7



154

Page 8 of 39

Table 1 ………………………………………………………….

155

Measurement of water retention in different negative pressure. 0.1 g of dried SA

156

was maintained in 250 mL of distilled water for swelling equilibrium at room

157

temperature. The swollen sample was weighed (W) and then placed in a pressure

158

membrane instrument and weighed at various negative pressures. The water retention

159

ratio at different negative pressures was calculated by Equation (3):

WR%  1 -

160

161

W  Wp W

100%

(3)

Where WR% is the water retention percentage and Wp is the mass of the sample

162

at negative pressure p.

163

Water absorbency in different salt solutions. The water absorbency in different salt

164

solution (KH2PO4, K2SO4, NH4Cl) with a concentration of 0.2%, 0.6%, and 1.0%

165

were tested according to the same procedures described in Section 2.3.

166

Characterization. FTIR spectra were recorded on a NEXUS-470 series FTIR

167

spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet, NEXUS). The samples were initially dried under

168

vacuum until they reached a constant weight. Later on, the dried samples were ground

169

into powder, mixed with KBr powder, and then pressed to make a pellet for FTIR

170

characterization. SEM images were taken on a JSM-5600LV equipment after the

171

sample was coated with gold film for good conductivity.

172

Growth experiments. Sandy loam, loam, and paddy soil (＜0.20 mm) were used as

173

the growth medium. Corn seeds with similar sizes germinated in a growth chamber

174

(GXZ-SMART, Ningbo Jiangnan Instrument Co., China) at 25 oC and grown in soil

175

for 10 days. In each soil, four different concentrations of SA (0%, 0.2%, 0.5%, and 8


Page 9 of 39


176

1.0%) were applied to the germination test, and only distilled water was added to soil.

177

For each test, 100 g of soil and the designed SA were well mixed and packed in a 100

178

mL plastic cup with one corn seed placed 1 cm away from top layer. Another 50 mL

179

of distilled water was then added to the container to saturate the soil. The plants were

180

grown for 10 days. The roots and seedling were washed carefully with distilled water

181

and dried with bibulous paper, and then the length was measured. Each treatment was

182

repeated three times.

183

Urea release in water. The kinetic of urea release in water at 25oC was examined

184

according to the previous reports.24 Briefly, 1.0 g of SA was embedded into a tea bag

185

and then immersed in 1 L distilled water. After each incubated period (days 1, 3, 5, 7,

186

10, 20, 30, 40), 10 mL solution was sampled for N release determination, and the

187

other 10 mL distilled water was added into the release medium to maintain a constant

188

volume of the solvent. The release experiments were conducted in triplicate and

189

average value was taken as the result.

190

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

191

Optimization of SA absorption synthesis condition. Superabsorbent (SA)

192

synthesized from urea and acrylic acid under different conditions exhibited different

193

water absorbencies properties due to their different structures. To seek the suitable

194

conditions of SA synthesis, orthogonal experiments with seven factors and three

195

levels were set up. “A” indicates the molar ratio of urea to AA, and there are three

196

levels of 0.4, 1.0, 1.6 mol/mol. “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F” and “G” stand for the

197

percentage of AA neutralized by 20 wt% alkaline solution, cationic species, KPS to 9



198

AA mass fraction, MBA to AA mass fraction and reaction temperature, respectively.

199

According to the orthogonal table of L18(3)7 shown in Table 2, the following

200

experiments were carried out (Table 3) and the range analysis was exhibited in Table 4.

201

The result of the range analysis showed that the order of influencing factors on water

202

absorbency was E＞B＞F＞A＞C＞D＞G. MBA to AA mass fraction is the most

203

influential factor, the percentage of AA neutralization degree followed, and then

204

reaction temperature, urea to AA mole ratio, cationic species, KPS to AA mass

205

fraction and reaction time are the last. According to the orthogonal experiment results,

206

the best combination of synthesis condition is A2B3C2D2E1F1G2, and the

207

corresponding conditions are as follows: 1.0 mol/mol urea to AA mole ratio, 100% of

208

AA neutralized, K+, 2.5% KPS to AA mass fraction, 0.02% MBA to AA mass fraction,

209

45 oC reaction temperature and 4.0 h reaction time.

210

Table 2………………………………………………………….

211

Table 3………………………………………………………….

212

Table 4………………………………………………………….

213

Effect of the quality ratio of MBA to AA on water absorbency. In order to get the

214

product with highest water absorption, the effect of single factor on water absorbent

215

performance of SA was studied by changing the single factor based on the

216

optimization results of orthogonal tests. As described by the Flory’s network theory,

217

the degree of cross-linking is an important factor in controlling swelling.25 The

218

properties of superabsorbent will face great change when a relatively small changes

219

exist in cross-linking density. In view of the water absorbency of SA, the relationship 10


Page 10 of 39

Page 11 of 39


220

between water absorbency and mass ratio of MBA to AA was studied. As the mass

221

ratio of MBA and AA increased from 0.005% to 0.08%, the water absorption

222

decreased significantly (Figure 2B). It is generally known that the cross-linking

223

density is determined by the amount of cross-linker. Obviously, higher MBA levels

224

produce more cross-linking, which also causes additional network formation. These

225

networks will further reduce the available free volume inside the superabsorbent

226

polymer and reduce the water absorption rate even more difficult. When the weight

227

ratio of MBA to AA was less than 0.005 wt%, the absorbency of superabsorbent was

228

very low. The less cross-linking point not only decreased the cross-linking density, but

229

also leaded to the increase of soluble material. Similar observations were also

230

previously reported by Riedel et al.26 and Li et al.27

231

Fig. 2………………………………………………………….

232

Effect of neutralization degree of AA on water absorbency. The influence of

233

neutralization degree of acrylic acid (AA) on the water absorbency in distilled water

234

is illustrated in Figure 2C. The results showed that the water absorbency of SA

235

increased with the neutralization degree of AA increasing from 75% to 85%, and then

236

decreased with the neutralization degree further increasing to 100%. The optimal

237

water absorption of SA was 504 g/g when the degree of AA neutralization reached

238

85%. The above phenomena can be explained as follows. At the low degree of

239

neutralization, the number of strong hydrophilic groups -COOK increased with the

240

increase of neutralization degree. When such -COOK groups dissociate, the carboxyl

241

group with a negative charge is suspended on the polymer chain and the electrostatic 11



242

repulsion is established, leading to expand of the network. At the same time, the

243

concentration of ion in polymers network structure increased and the osmotic pressure

244

rose, which was conducive to the infiltration of water molecules into the network

245

structure to improve the water absorbency. However, when the neutralization degree

246

exceeded 85%, there were abundant and strong hydrogen bonds between water

247

molecules and ionic polymers. The water molecules had specific spatial orientation,

248

and adjacent hydrogen bonds interfered with each other due to the directional

249

hydrogen bonds. Additionally, the electrostatic repulsion of contiguous -COO- groups

250

limited the free movement of bonds, and weakened the storage capacity of polymers

251

microspore structure. The water absorbency of hydrogels was reduced due to the

252

resulted dense network structure.

253

Effect of reaction temperature on water absorbency. With the other parameters

254

unchanged, the influence of reaction temperature from 25 to 75 oC was investigated.

255

Figure 2D shows that the water absorbency increased significantly when temperature

256

increased from 25 to 45 oC, and then decreased relatively with the temperature further

257

increasing. When the reaction begins, the chain formed by the polymerization is short

258

chain, which is bad for water absorption. On the other hand, a long time reaction will

259

lead to an increase in the degree of polymer cross-linking. Multiple branched chains

260

were formed in the network structure, and they tangled with each other to produce

261

small holes in three-dimensional networks, obstructing the expansion of polymer.

262

Hence, too long or too short reaction time resulted in a low water absorbency.28

263

Effect of the ratio of urea to AA on water absorbency. Different components and 12


Page 12 of 39

Page 13 of 39


264

monomer ratio have obvious influence on the properties of superabsorbent resin. To

265

increase the absorption performance and reduce the manufacturing costs of the

266

superabsorbent, urea was introduced as a non-ionic water absorbent monomer. At the

267

same time, as another monomer, AA was used to improve the water absorbency ability

268

(Qeq). It can be seen in Figure 2E that the maximum value of Qeq was obtained when

269

the mole ratio of urea/AA was 1.6. An initial increase of the Qeq was apparently

270

observed when the mole ratio was less than 1.6. On the contrary, the Qeq decreased

271

when the mole ratio was greater than 1.6. Such phenomenon was caused by the

272

cooperation effect of the two monomers. Urea can improve the water ability of

273

superabsorbent, which result in the increase of Qeq in water at the initial stage.

274

However, AA has better hydrophilicity than urea, the Qeq decreased with the urea

275

further increasing.

276

Effect of the initiator amount on water absorbency. The water absorption initially

277

increased and then decreased with the increase of initiator dosage (Figure 2F). The

278

maximum absorbency in distilled water could reach 909 g/g. It was found that the

279

amount of initiator had an obvious effect on water absorbency of hydrogels, which

280

was consistent with the relationship between the initiator concentration and average

281

chain length during the polymerization process. AA monomers could be polymerized

282

because the KPS initiator could generate many free-radical reactive sites. When the

283

dosage of KPS initiator was low, the SA superabsorbent with a three-dimensional

284

structure was formed and the water absorbency was improved. However, excess KPS

285

initiator accelerated AA self-polymerization, but it also reduced the amount of 13



286

reaction between AA and urea. In the meantime, with the increase of the amount of

287

KPS initiator, the three-dimensional structure of SA became denser, resulting in the

288

decrease of water absorbency. From above single factor experiments, it can be

289

concluded that the optimal conditions with maximum water absorbency (909 g/g)

290

were found as follows: 1.0 mol/mol urea to AA mole ratio, 100% of AA neutralized,

291

K+, 1.5% KPS to AA mass fraction, 0.02% MBA to AA mass fraction, 45 oC reaction

292

temperature and 4.0 h reaction time.

293

FT-IR measurements. Figure 2A shows the FTIR spectra of urea, SA, and MBA.

294

The characteristic peaks in the urea spectra are ascribed as following: 3440 and 1687

295

cm-1 could be assigned to the -NH2 and C=O stretching of -CONH2. For MBA, the

296

peak of 3300 cm-1 corresponded to C=C stretching vibration. For SA, the

297

characteristic peaks of urea was observed (1669 cm-1 for the -C=O stretching of

298

-CONH2, 1160 cm-1 for the bending of the amide bands), and the active hydrogen of

299

-NH2 in 3455 cm-1 was obviously weakened. The appearance of these bands confirms

300

the formation of SA material.

301

Morphological analyses. In order to identify the surface and internal structure of SA,

302

the scanning electron microscope (SEM) technique has been applied. The SEM image

303

of SA (Figure 3(a)) showed that a large number of pore structures with sizes lower

304

than 0.1 mm were uniformly distributed in them. These porous structures were very

305

favorable for the absorption and retention of water. Besides, it could be found that the

306

interior was filled with three-dimensional polymeric networks in SA (Figure3(b)). The

307

highly porous structures with interlinked channels formed by urea, AA, and MBA are 14


Page 14 of 39

Page 15 of 39


308

beneficial for more water molecules diffusing into the network of SA, leading to a

309

higher swelling ratio.

310

Fig. 3………………………………………………………….

311

Water retention at various negative pressures. The water absorbed and transported

312

by plant was powered by root pressure and negative pressure of transpiration.29

313

Therefore, only the water absorbed in a certain negative pressure range is effective for

314

plants, not all water can be absorbed by plants. Figure 4 displayed the relationship

315

between negative pressure and water retention of SA. With the increase of negative

316

pressure, the moisture absorbed by SA gradually released. The water retention of A, B,

317

C was 42.6 wt%, 29.9 wt% and 62.8 wt% at 0.1 MPa, respectively. When the negative

318

pressure was more than 0.3 MPa, the downward trend of the water retention of A, B,

319

C became slow with increasing of negative pressure. According to the previous

320

literature,30 the optimum soil water potential is less 0.8 MPa for plant growing. It can

321

be found that the effective water content, that is, the water that can be used by plants

322

for A, B, C, were 94.3 wt%, 95.6 wt%, 72.4 wt%, respectively. Considering above,

323

the product B has excellent water retention properties and important application valve,

324

and has broad application prospects in agriculture.

325

Fig. 4………………………………………………………….

326

Water absorbency in different salt solutions. The effect of various ions on water

327

absorbency can be concluded from Figure 5. The water absorption rate significantly

328

decreased when the salt concentration of the solutions increased from 0.2% to 1.0%,

329

and gently decreased in the concentration higher than 0.6%. For ionic hydrogels, the 15



330

additional cations caused an anion-anion electrostatic repulsion, which lead to a

331

decrease in osmotic pressure between the external solution and the polymer network.

332

So the swelling decreased.31 Secondly, the order of water absorbency of the hydrogel

333

in the salt solutions followed KH2PO4 ＞ K2SO4 ＞ NH4Cl when the solution

334

concentrations were lower than 1.0 wt%. This was due to the water absorbency in

335

polyatomic monovalent cationic (NH4+) solution decreased more than that in single

336

atom monovalent cationic (K+) solution, and the sensitivity of superabsorbent to

337

various cations was PO43-< SO42-< Cl-.28

338

Fig. 5………………………………………………………….

339

Water retention in various soils. The water retention property of superabsorbent

340

used in agriculture and horticulture is a key property for soil water conservation. It

341

has positive effects on improving soil quality, raising the survival rate of seedlings

342

and promoting the growth of plants. In order to invest the water retention effect of SA

343

in different kind of soil, the experiments of water retaining agent were carried out in

344

three types of soil (sandy loam, loam, paddy soil). Figure 6 presents the water

345

absorbency of the SA in sandy loam, loam and paddy soil, standing for the typical soil

346

in different regions. It can be found that the addition of SA into sandy loam, loam and

347

paddy soil could significantly improve the water holding capacity and water-retention

348

properties of soil. After 192 h, the relative water content of sandy soil, loam and

349

paddy soil treated with SA was 42%, 56% and 45%, respectively. However, the

350

relative water content of soils (sandy loam, loam, paddy soil) without SA were only

351

2%, 18% and 4%. 16


Page 16 of 39

Page 17 of 39

352


Fig. 6………………………………………………………….

353

Effect of SA on maize germination. SA has a significant influence on the

354

development of maize seeds. Measurements of the seeding lengths showed the SA

355

treatment with less 0.2% content promoted root growth (Figure 7B). The average

356

seedling lengths of maize seeds treated by the SA were significantly larger than that of

357

the control groups, not only the sandy loam group but also the loam and paddy soil.

358

Among all the groups, the 0.2% treatments showed the longest seedling height (Figure

359

7A), which was almost twice of that of the 0% and 0.5%. Besides, it can be found that

360

when soil SA content exceeded 1%, maize seeds germinated only in loam soil (Figure

361

7). SA is a new type of water-retention slow release fertilizer containing a large

362

amount of nitrogen. SA releases nitrogen slowly after it is applied to the soil.

363

Therefore, more nitrogen would release into soil solution when the amount of SA

364

increased, and the high nitrogen concentration of the soil inhibited the growth of crop

365

roots. These results indicated that low concentration of SA (﹤0.2%) promote the

366

embryo development of the corn seeds.

367

Fig. 7………………………………………………………….

368

Slow release urea behavior of SA. One of the important properties of SA prepared

369

was its N sustained release performance. Figure 8 represented the N slow release

370

behavior of SA in water. It can be found that the N release curve approximates the

371

straight line, and N in SA released 0.18, 0.37, 0.58, 0.81, 1.06, 1.59, 2.67, 3.71 wt%

372

with in 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 20, 30, 40 days, respectively. A release value of 3.71% for

373

nutrient N could be reached after being incubated in distilled water for 40 days. This 17



374

indicated that the N in SA released very slow, could be applicable for the crops with a

375

long duration of fertilizer.

376

Currently, the most of slow release fertilizer was prepared by coating common

377

granule fertilizer to isolate the moisture outside the membrane and reduce water

378

dissolution. SA was prepared through chemical synthesis to slow release dissolution.

379

The mechanism of SA was totally different from that of coated fertilizer. The nutrient

380

release mechanism of SA could be illustrated as follows: (1) under the action of water

381

absorbing group, the SA adsorbed water molecules and slowly swollen after it was

382

added into distilled water. Thereafter, the three-dimensional network structure of SA

383

became larger and the pores were filled with free water until the maximum water

384

absorption rate was reached. (2) The urea molecule was gradually hydrolyzed from

385

the molecular chain and dissolved in the three-dimensional network pores. The

386

dissolved urea would be slowly diffused out the network pores through the dynamic

387

exchange of free water.

388

Fig. 8………………………………………………………….

389 390 391 392 393 394 395 18


Page 18 of 39

Page 19 of 39


396 397

AUTHOR INFORMATION

398

Corresponding author

399

*Tel/Fax: +86-538-8241531. Email: [email protected]

400

ORCID

401

Dongdong Cheng: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2939-1415

402

Notes

403

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

404

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

405

This study was supported by The National Key Research and Development Program

406

of China (2016YFD0201105, 2017YFD0200702, SQ2017ZY060105-06), the Natural

407

Foundation of Shandong Provice (ZR2017BC091), Shandong Quan Lin Jia Fertilizer

408

Co., Ltd., STANLEY fund (010-380261; QL2016-4).

409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 19



418

REFERENCE

419

(1) Carrao, H.; Naumann, G.; Barbosa, P. Mapping global patterns of drought risk: An

420

empirical framework based on sub-national estimates of hazard, exposure and

421

vulnerability. Global. Environ. Chang. 2016, 39, 108-124.

422

(2) Seetapan, N.; Wongsawaeng, J.; Kiatkamjornwong, S. Gel strength and swelling

423

of acrylamide-protic acid superabsorbent copolymers. Polym. Advan. Technol. 2011,

424

22, 1685-1695.

425

(3) Zohuriaan-Mehr, M.J.; Omidian, H.; Doroudiani, S.; Kabiri, K. Advances in

426

non-hygienic applications of superabsorbent hydrogel materials. J. Mater. Sci. 2010,

427

45, 5711-5735.

428

(4) Ni, B.L.; Liu, M.Z.; Lu, S.Y.; Xie, L.H.; Wang, Y.F. Multifunctional slow-release

429

organic-inorganic compound fertilizer. J. Agr. Food. Chem. 2010, 58, 12373-12378.

430

(5) Wei, J.; Yang, H.Y.; Cao, H.; Tan, T.W. Using polyaspartic acid hydro-gel as water

431

retaining agent and its effect on plants under drought stress. Saudi. J. Biol. Sci. 2016,

432

23, 654-659.

433

(6) Guo, L.W.; Ning, T.Y.; Nie, L.P.; Li, Z.J.; Lal, R. Interaction of deep placed

434

controlled-release urea and water retention agent on nitrogen and water use and maize

435

yield. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 75, 118-129.

436

(7) Witono, J.R.; Noordergraaf, I.W.; Heeres, H.J.; Janssen, L.P.B.M. Water

437

absorption, retention and the swelling characteristics of cassava starch grafted with

438

polyacrylic acid. Carbohyd. Polym. 2014, 103, 325-332.

439

(8) Li, S.X.; Wang, Z.H.; Malhi, S.S.; Li, S.Q.; Gao, Y.J.; Tian, X.H. Nutrient and 20


Page 20 of 39

Page 21 of 39


440

water management effects on crop production, and nutrient and water use efficiency

441

in dry land areas of China. Adv. Agron.2009, 102, 223-265.

442

(9) Spiertz, J.H.J. Nitrogen, sustainable agriculture and food security: a review. Agron.

443

Sustain. Dev. 2010, 30, 43-55.

444

(10) Wu, L.; Liu, M.Z. Preparation and characterization of cellulose acetate-coated

445

compound fertilizer with controlled-release and water-retention. Polym. Advan.

446

Technol. 2008, 19, 8610-8616.

447

(11) Teodorescu, M.; Lungu, A.; Stanescu, P.O.; Neamtu, C. Preparation and

448

properties of novel slow-release NPK agrochemical formulations based on

449

poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels and liquid fertilizers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48,

450

6527-6534.

451

(12) Zhang, X.; Bol, R.; Rahn, C.; Xiao, G.M.; Meng, F.Q.; Wu, W.L. Agricultural

452

sustainable intensification improved nitrogen use efficiency and maintained high crop

453

yield during 1980-2014 in Northern China. Sci. Total. Environ. 2017, 596, 61-68.

454

(13) EI-Rehim, H.A.A.; Hegazy, E.S.A.; EI-Mohdy, H.L.A. Radiation synthesis of

455

hydrogels to enhance sandy soils water retention and increase plant performance. J.

456

Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 93, 1360-1371.

457

(14) Ni, B.L.; Liu, M.Z.; Lü, S.Y. Multifunctional slow-release urea fertilizer from

458

ethylcellulose and superabsorbent coated formulations. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 155

459

892-898.

460

(15) Liang, R.; Liu, M.Z. Preparation and properties of a double-coated slow-release

461

and water-retention urea fertilizer. J. Agr. Food. Chem. 2006, 54, 1392-1398. 21



462

(16) Xie, L.H.; Liu, M.Z.; Ni, B.L.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.F. Slow-release nitrogen and

463

boron fertilizer from a functional superabsorbent formulation based on wheat straw

464

and attapulgite. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 167, 342-348.

465

(17) Yang, Y.C.; Tong, Z.H.; Geng, Y.Q.; Li, Y.C.; Zhang, M. Biobased polymer

466

composites derived from corn stover and feather meals as double-coating materials

467

for controlled-release and water-retention urea fertilizers. J. Agr. Food. Chem. 2013,

468

61, 8166-8174.

469

(18) Rodriguez, D.E.; Romero-Garcia, J.; Ramirez-Vargas, E.; Ledezma-Perez, A.S.;

470

Arias-Marin, E. Synthesis and swelling characteristics of semi-interpenetrating

471

polymer network hydrogels composed of poly(acrylamide) and poly(γ -glutamic

472

acid). Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 1390-1393.

473

(19) Sadeghi, S.H.; Hazbavi, Z.; Younesi, H.; Bahramifar, N. Trade-off between

474

runoff and sediments from treated erosion plots and polyacrylamide and acrylamide

475

residues. CATENA. 2016, 142, 213-220.

476

(20) Jin, J.P.; Yue, G.R.; Feng, L.; Han, Y.Q.; Yu, X.H.; Zhang, Z.H. Preparation and

477

properties of a coated slow-release and water-retention biuret phosphoramide fertilizer

478

with superabsorbent. J. Agr. Food. Chem. 2010, 59, 322-327.

479

(21) Bansiwal, A.K.; Rayalu, S.S.; Labhasetwar, N.K.; Juwarkar, A.A.; Devotta, S.

480

Surfactant-modified zeolite as a slow release fertilizer for phosphorus. J. Agr. Food.

481

Chem. 2006, 54, 4773-4779.

482

(22) Teodorescu, M. Lungu, A. Stanescu, P.O. Neamtu, C. Preparation and properties

483

of novel slow-release NPK agrochemical formulations based on poly(acrylic acid) 22


Page 22 of 39

Page 23 of 39


484

hydrogels and liquidfertilizers.Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.2009, 48,6527-6534.

485

(23) Al-Sagheer, F.A.; Khalil, K.D.; Ibrahim, E.I. Synthesis and characterization of

486

chitosan-g-poly(2-(furan-2-carbonyl)-acrylonitrile): Grafting of chitosan using a novel

487

monomer prepared by a Baylis-Hillman reaction. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49, 1662-1672.

488

(24) Tomaszewska, M. Jarosiewicz, A. Use of polysulfone in controlled-release NPK

489

fertilizer formulations. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2002, 50, 4634-4639.

490

(25) Flory, P.J. Principles of polymer chemistry; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY,

491

1953.

492

(26) Riedel, M. Relationship between water absorbency and reaction conditions in

493

aqueous solution polymerization of polyacrylate superabsorbents. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.

494

2000, 75, 808-814.

495

(27) Li, A.; Wang, A.; Chen, J. Studies on poly (acrylic acid)/attapulgite

496

superabsorbent composite. I. Synthesis and characterization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004,

497

92, 1596-1603.

498

(28) Zhang, M.Y.; Cheng, Z.Q.; Zhao, T.Q.; Liu, M.Z.; Hu, M.J.; Li, J.F. Synthesis,

499

characterization, and swelling behaviors of salt-sensitive maize bran-poly(acrylic acid)

500

superabsorbent hydrogel. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2014, 62, 8867-8874.

501

(29) Robbins, N.E.; Dinneny, J.R. The divining root: moisture-driven responses of

502

roots at the micro- and macro-scale. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2145-2154.

503

(30) Campbell, G.S. Soil water potential measurement: An overview, Irrigation. Sci.

504

1988, 9, 265-273.

505

(31) Zhao, Y.; Su, H.; Fang, L.; Tan, T. Superabsorbent hydrogels from poly(aspartic 23



506

acid) with salt-, temperature- and pH-responsiveness properties. Polymer. 2005, 46,

507

5368-5376.

508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 24


Page 24 of 39

Page 25 of 39


528

FIGURE CAPTIONS

529

Figure 1. Synthesis schematic of SA.

530

Figure 2. (A) FI-IR Spectra of SA, urea and MBA; Influence of different factors on water

531

absorption: (B) the quality ratio of MBA:AA(g/g), (C) neutralization degree of AA (%), (D)

532

temperature, (E) urea:AA (mol), (F) initiator content.

533

Figure 3. SEM micrograph of (a) surface and (b) internal structure.

534

Figure 4. Water retention at various negative pressures.

535

(The water absorbency in the distilled water：A-909 g/g; B-885 g/g; C-835 g/g)

536

Figure 5. Water absorbency in different salt solutions.

537

Figure 6. Daily water retention property of sandy loam, loam and paddy soil amended with SA.

538

Figure 7. Effect of SA content in different tyepes of soil on seedling height (A) and root length (B)

539

in maize.

540

Figure 8. Slow release urea behavior of SA.

541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 25



Page 26 of 39

TABLES 550

Table 1. Soil texture Soil types

Field capacity (%)

Clay (g/kg)

Sand (g/kg)

Silt (g/kg)

Loam

17.72

185

191

624

Sandy loam

6.27

61

793

146

Paddy soil

28.83

341

321

338

551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 26


Page 27 of 39


567

Table 2

568

Factors and levels of the orthogonal experiment (A: Urea to AA mole ratio; B: the percentage of

569

AA neutralized by 20% KOH solution; C: cationic species; D: KPS to AA mass fraction; E: MBA

570

to AA mass fraction; F: reaction temperature; G: reaction time). Factor level

A (mol/mol)

B (%)

C

D (%)

E (%)

F (℃)

G (h)

1

0.4

70

Na+

0.5

0.02

45

3.0

2

1.0

85

K+

2.5

0.10

55

4.0

3

1.6

100

Ca2+

5.0

0.20

65

5.0

571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 27



Page 28 of 39

586

Table 3

587

The orthogonal L18(3)7 experiment of Urea, the percentage of AA neutralized, cationic species,

588

KPS, MBA, reaction temperature and reaction time (A: Urea to AA mole ratio; B: the percentage

589

of AA neutralized by 20% KOH solution; C: cationic species; D: KPS to AA mass fraction; E:

590

MBA to AA mass fraction; F: reaction temperature; G: reaction time; Qd: the water absorbency in

591

the distilled water). Sample no.

A (mol/mol)

B (%)

C

D (%)

E (%)

F (℃)

G (h)

Qd (g/g)

1

1(0.4)

1(70)

1(Na+)

1(0.5)

1(0.02)

1(45)

1(3.0)

157.7

2

1(0.4)

2(85)

2(K+)

2(2.5)

2(0.10)

2(55)

2(4.0)

171.5

3

1(0.4)

3(100)

3(Ca2+)

3(5.0)

3(0.20)

3(65)

3(5.0)

28.6

4

2(1.0)

1(70)

1(Na+)

2(2.5)

2(0.10)

3(65)

3(5.0)

51.8

5

2(1.0)

2(85)

2(K+)

3(5.0)

3(0.20)

1(45)

1(3.0)

142.3

6

2(1.0)

3(100)

3(Ca2+)

1(0.5)

1(0.02)

2(55)

2(4.0)

699.1

7

3(1.6)

1(70)

2(K+)

1(0.5)

3(0.20)

2(55)

3(5.0)

64.1

8

3(1.6)

2(85)

3(Ca2+)

2(2.5)

1(0.02)

3(65)

1(3.0)

317.0

9

3(1.6)

3(100)

1(Na+)

3(5.0)

2(0.10)

1(45)

2(4.0)

189.1

10

1(0.4)

1(70)

3(Ca2+)

3(5.0)

2(0.10)

2(55)

1(3.0)

40.2

11

1(0.4)

2(85)

1(Na+)

1(0.5)

3(0.20)

3(65)

2(4.0)

41.2

12

1(0.4)

3(100)

2(K+)

2(2.5)

1(0.02)

1(45)

3(5.0)

665.2

13

2(1.0)

1(70)

2(K+)

3(5.0)

1(0.02)

3(65)

2(4.0)

246.5

14

2(1.0)

2(85)

3(Ca2+)

1(0.5)

2(0.10)

1(45)

3(5.0)

226.6

15

2(1.0)

3(100)

1(Na+)

2(2.5)

3(0.20)

2(55)

1(3.0)

164.5

28


Page 29 of 39


16

3(1.6)

1(70)

3(Ca2+)

2(2.5)

3(0.20)

1(45)

2(4.0)

52.7

17

3(1.6)

2(85)

1(Na+)

3(5.0)

1(0.02)

2(55)

3(5.0)

231.2

18

3(1.6)

3(100)

2(K+)

1(0.5)

2(0.10)

3(65)

1(3.0)

94.7

592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 29



Page 30 of 39

611

Table 4

612

Analysis of the orthogonal L18(3)7 experiment (A: Urea to AA mole ratio; B: the percentage of

613

AA neutralized by 20% KOH solution; C: cationic species; D: KPS to AA mass fraction; E: MBA

614

to AA mass fraction; F: reaction temperature; G: reaction time). A

B

C

D

E

F

G

K1a

184.1

102.2

139.3

213.9

382.8

238.9

152.7

K2

255.1

188.3

230.7

237.1

129.0

228.4

233.4

K3

158.1

306.9

227.4

146.4

82.2

129.0

211.6

Rb

97.0

204.7

91.4

90.7

300.6

109.9

80.7

Influencing order Optimal

E＞B＞F＞A＞C＞D＞G A2

B3

C2

combination 615

a

616

b

D2

E1

A2B3C2D2E1F1G2

K1=(∑the water absorbency in the distilled water of single-factor)/4 R=max K1-min K1.

617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 30


F1

G2

Page 31 of 39

625


FIGURES

626 627

Figure 1

628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 31



638 639

Figure 2

640 641 642 643 644

32


Page 32 of 39

Page 33 of 39


645 646

Figure 3

647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 33



664 665

Figure 4

666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 34


Page 34 of 39

Page 35 of 39


677 678

Figure 5

679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 35



690 691

Figure 6

692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 36


Page 36 of 39

Page 37 of 39


703 704

Figure 7

705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 37



715 716

Figure 8

717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 38


Page 38 of 39

Page 39 of 39


728 729

TOC Graphic

39


Water- and Fertilizer-Integrated Hydrogel Derived from the

Recommend Documents