What's happening to descriptive inorganic chemistry - Journal of

Douglas G. Nicholson. J. Chem. Educ. , 1956, 33 (8), p 391. DOI: 10.1021/ed033p391 ... Keywords (Audience):. High School / Introductory Chemistry ...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
TRENDS: WHAT'S HAPPENING TO DESCRIPTIVE INORGANIC CHEMISTRY?' DOUGLAS G. NICHOLSON East Tennessee State College, Johnson City, Tennessee

as such, is characteristic of our present-day civilization. Our habits, mode of travel, recreation, courses of study, and our daily activities are materially different than those of 15 years ago. Each technical development and scientific discovery has had its effect on the activities and behavior of the human race. Certain of these are relatively insignificant while others are far-reaching in scope. The development of nuclear chemistry has greatly affected the subject matter content of our science courses. Items are now included which were unheard of a generation back. I n addition, the topic "nuclear chemistry" is practically inseparable from that of '6 nuclear physics." Thus the gap between the sciences of physics and chemistry (if any) is materially narrower than it was a few years ago. This trend toward closer association of physics and chemistry is reflected in the content and style of our more recently written textbooks. The "physical approach" in the introduction to chemistry is currently being stressed more extensively than it was 10-16 years ago. Obviously text authors have had to reduce or omit space devoted to subject matter formerly included, in order t o incorporate these newer developments. The same may be said for the teacher's allotment of course time. An examination of several recently written general chiinistry textbooks reveals a definite emphasis on the physical approach with a corresponding reduction in the space formerly devoted to a descriptive treatment CHANGE,

schoimtic failures is not greater than is evident. I with believe +,hat a descriptive introduction, ample illustrations and examples, followed by the heavier physical approach-as the student's mind becomes able to assimilate the material-would lead t o more thorough comprehension of the subject. Examination of one general chemistry textbook, published within the three years, reveals the following: (1) topics such as atoms, atomic weights, isotones. ~* , and Avoeadro's number are discussed (brieffv) in the initial 10 pages; (2) valence and radicalsare d k cussed within the initial 28 pages; with (3) the metric system covered in a total of 57 lines of text space and

a conversion (equivalent) table containing nine items, all within the initial five pages of the text. Obviously there are very few unessential statements and a minimum of comparative examples and illustrations. Such a text may be ideal for superior students, but should prove quite difficult for the "mine-run" of recent graduates from our secondary schools. F ~ l l e r in , ~ discussing the humanistic values of the study of chemistry, has mentioned the need for a balance between descriptive and theoretical subject matter and has stressed the "communicative power of well-defined words" in chemistry. Sislera has described the possibilities and potentialities of inorganic chemistry in the college chemistry curriculum. In keeping with these concepts, I am not suggesting or intending that the present general chemistry course be diluted in subject content, but am of the firm opinion that a more even balance between descriptive and theoretical treatment would result in greater appeal, and possibly better understanding, by students who have had very little past contact or experience with such an approach. I n an effort t o gain some sort of qualitative information to support the concept that current textbooks in general chemistry have a physical approach, 11 such texts published during the nine-year period 1946-55 were examined. A count was made of the number of text pages devoted to the topics: (1) halogens, hydro-halogens, and oxy-compounds of the halogens, as well as (2) sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, and oxy-com-

TABLE 1 Paw Space Devoted to Two Collective Topics in Each of Eleven General Chemistry Texts Written During 194655 -Topic ROO^

number

Presented before the Division of Chemical Education at the 128th Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Minneapolia, September, 1955.

391

year published

~.~~~ Chapters Pages

1946 1949 1950 1951 5 1952 1952 1954 8 1954 9 1954 10 1055 11 1955 hi^ text is known t , 1 2 3 4,

.

considered and space zn page-S?,lfirr -.,-. , .H.P - ,

-Wnfnnmm - - ..-,--H -X- ,

om,mmnounda .~.~~

~~

4

2 3 4 2 1 2 2 1 1 1

37

.-

ozides andocid? ~

chapters

~

~~~~~

Pages

2 2 2 2 2 1 17 18 2 22 2 18 2 15 1 18 1 the descriptive approach,

33 27 45 23

21 27 20 25 20 12 20 20 11 11 16

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION

which could be given generous descriptive coverage, while information contained in Table 2 indicates that the majority of text authors and co-authors have an interest in physical chemistry investigations. While a text in general chemistry should cover the entire field with equal stress and emphasis on each of the several important phases, it is logical to assume (and understand) that a writer will unconsciously stress those phases and aspects of the subject which are most interesting and real to him, a t the expense of topics in which he is less directly interested. Thus it 26* appears quite natural for one who is primarily iu' Certain universities do not grant Ph.D. degrees in specifio fields of chemistry. Thus this item may include additional in- terested in physical chemical research to approach the subject of general chemistry from the viewpoint which dividuals whose degree was in inorganic: The total number of individuals listed exceeds the total num- is closest to his heart. ber of authors and oo-authors because some individuals exmess & This present-day trend of stressing the physical dual research-field interest, such as ohvsical-oreanic. etc. approach may be due to the influence of modern depounds and acids of sulfur. Full-page cuts and full- velopments in nuclear chemistry, the background and page tabular data as well as space devoted t o exercises training of the author(s), or a combination of both. a t the end of chapters were not included in this survey. I firmly believe that descriptive coverage is a vital part This information is summarized in Table 1. of the introductory course and should not be sacrificed. The training and major fields of research interest of Could it be that this present trend could be a partial the 17 authors and co-authors of the 11 texts were ob- cause of our current scarcity of potential chemistry tained from the biographical information in "American majors? Are we literally scaring them out of couMen of Science." This information is listed in Table tinued study before they have an opportunity to de, 'A . clare a major? Let us hope that the pendulum of Data appearing in Table 1 show a trend toward re- trends swings back to a happy medium balance in the ducing the text space devoted to two general topics not-too-distant future. TABLE 2 R-h end Training of General Chsrnisttnr Textbook Authors Field of Ph.D. research Inorganic chemistry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Other than inoreanic".. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Present research interests Whole or partially inorganic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Partidly analytical. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Partiallvindustrial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Partially organic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Whole or partially physical. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 ~

~