Xenobiotics Produce Distinct Metabolomic Responses in Zebrafish

May 27, 2016 - ... xenobiotic exposure at environmentally relevant concentrations produces specific biochemical fingerprints in organisms, metabolomic...
0 downloads 10 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN

Article

Xenobiotics Produce Distinct Metabolomic Responses in Zebrafish Larvae (Danio rerio) Susie Shih Yin Huang, Jonathan P. Benskin, Bharat Chandramouli, Heather Butler, Caren C. Helbing, and John R. Cosgrove Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01128 • Publication Date (Web): 27 May 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 7, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Xenobiotics Produce Distinct Metabolomic Responses in Zebrafish Larvae (Danio rerio)

2

Susie S.Y. Huang1*, Jonathan P. Benskin1,2, Bharat Chandramouli1, Heather Butler1, Caren C. Helbing3,

3

John R. Cosgrove1

4 5 6

1

7

2

8

Stockholm, Sweden

9

3

AXYS Analytical Services Ltd., Sidney, BC, Canada

Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES), Stockholm University,

Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

* Corresponding author

20

2045 Mills Road West

21

Sidney, BC, Canada V8L 5X2

22

Tel: +1-250-655-5800

23

Fax: +1-250-5811

24

E-mail: [email protected]

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

25

Page 2 of 28

Abstract

26

Sensitive and quantitative protocols for characterizing low-dose effects are needed to meet the

27

demands of 21st century chemical hazard assessment. To test the hypothesis that xenobiotic exposure at

28

environmentally relevant concentrations produces specific biochemical fingerprints in organisms,

29

metabolomic perturbations in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo/larvae were measured following 24-hour

30

exposures to 13 individual chemicals covering a wide range of contaminant classes. Measured

31

metabolites (208 in total) included amino acids, biogenic amines, fatty acids, bile acids, sugars, and

32

lipids. The 96 to 120 hours post-fertilization developmental stage was the most appropriate model for

33

detecting xenobiotic-induced metabolomic perturbations. Metabolomic fingerprints were largely

34

chemical- and dose-specific and were reproducible in multiple exposures over a 16 month period.

35

Furthermore, chemical-specific responses were detected in the presence of an effluent matrix;

36

importantly, in the absence of morphological response. In addition to improving sensitivity for detecting

37

biological responses to low-level xenobiotic exposures, these data can aid the classification of novel

38

contaminants based on the similarity of metabolomic responses to well-characterized ‘model’

39

compounds. This approach is clearly of use for rapid, sensitive, and specific analyses of chemical effect

40

on organisms, and can supplement existing methods, such as the Zebrafish Embryo Toxicity assay (OECD

41

TG236), with molecular-level information.

42

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 28

43

Environmental Science & Technology

Introduction

44

The introduction of the European Union’s Regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorization

45

and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) places an increased demand on the use of animals for toxicity

46

testing. The Zebrafish Embryo Toxicity assay (ZFET; Organization of Economic Cooperation and

47

Development (OECD) assay #TG236), which involves acute toxicity testing in zebrafish (Danio rerio; ZF)

48

embryos, was recently introduced as an alternative to adult fish toxicity testing.1 ZFET vastly reduces the

49

number of animals used for testing since teleost up to 120 hours post-fertilization (hpf) do not fall into

50

regulatory frameworks dealing with animal experimentation, such as EU Directive 2010/63/EU and the

51

Canadian Council of Animal Care. The limitation of ZFET is that it measures morphological endpoints

52

which are often indistinguishable among substances with different modes-of-action (MOAs) and

53

importantly, may not be observable in low-dose exposures. New approaches which supplement existing

54

toxicological assays, such as ZFET, with highly specific information on a chemical’s MOA, would add

55

tremendous value to predictive toxicity testing.

56

Changes in RNA, proteins, and/or metabolite levels in animals exposed to a toxicant can provide

57

information on the molecular initiating events and the affected biological pathways that lead to adverse

58

outcomes.2 These molecular biomarkers may provide a useful means of carrying out effects-directed

59

analysis in environmental samples. Recently, toxicogenomic profiles of 11 toxicants were characterized

60

in a ZF model at dose concentrations that did not induce observable changes in morphology.3 This

61

molecular “effect-based” profiling approach can be a rapid and cost effective alternative to conventional

62

methods of identifying active substances associated with adverse effects.

63

Metabolomics is the highly multiplexed analysis of endogenous small molecules (metabolites)

64

within a cell, tissue or biofluid. As endogenous metabolite concentrations are determined by the

65

organism's biochemical processes, metabolomics is regarded as a comprehensive evaluation of

66

biological response.4 The technique is gaining ground in studies on organism-environment interactions

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 28

67

since, in principle, metabolite measurements represent the functional metabolic phenotype of an

68

exposed organism. Furthermore, metabolomics is considered to be more statistically powerful in

69

detecting robust effects compared with other “omics” technologies.5 Metabolomics is becoming a

70

popular tool for characterising biological responses to environmental stressors in a variety of aquatic

71

species. In teleost, metabolomics has been used to study the effects of temperature stress,6 anoxia,7 in-

72

stream migration and spawning,8 environmental contaminants,9–12 as well as characterization of early

73

developmental stages.13

74

Gene expression barcoding of xenobiotic responses in ZF has been attempted previously3 but to

75

our knowledge metabolomics has not been similarly applied. In the work presented here, we

76

hypothesized that sub-lethal exposure of ZF to individual chemicals could be fingerprinted using

77

metabolomics. Among the existing classes of contaminants, we tested this hypothesis using a suite of 13

78

diverse xenobiotics, including endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs), petroleum-derived compounds,

79

performance chemicals, pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), and heavy metals.

80

Metabolomic analysis was carried out using a targeted approach for 208 primary metabolites. As the

81

first toxicometabolomic fingerprinting study of its kind, we characterized fundamental parameters of

82

the assay, including the effect of dose, developmental stage, co-exposure to multiple substances, and

83

the presence of an environmental matrix (wastewater treatment plant effluent; WWTP). This approach

84

can provide a powerful means of classifying novel contaminants based on the similarity of their

85

metabolomic response to well-characterized substances, while supplementing functional data

86

generated by OECD TG236 with information on molecular phenotype.

87

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

88

Experimental

89

Chemicals

90

Chemicals were selected for their environmental relevance, toxicity, and to encompass a diverse

91

range of known MOAs (Table S1). Background information on individual chemicals and the justification

92

for their inclusion can be found in the SI. Nominal concentrations were selected to induce minimal

93

phenotypic effects in zebrafish and other teleost species based on available half maximal effective

94

concentrations (EC50), lowest observable effect levels (LOEL), and no observable effect levels (NOEL) in

95

the available literature (Table S1). The dosing concentrations used were adjusted from those reported in

96

the literature to account for differences in developmental stages of the exposed animals, duration of the

97

exposure, and experimental conditions. For PPCPs and heavy metals, the lowest dose selected is

98

comparable to effluent levels14 or consumer safety guidelines.15

99

Ethanol was used as the carrier (0.05-0.1%) for all chemicals except for heavy metals and

100

effluent groups where no carrier was used. All chemicals and reagents were obtained from Sigma-

101

Aldrich (USA) unless stated otherwise (SI). Chemical concentrations are reported as measured values in

102

all results shown.

103 104

Exposures

105

Five biological replicates comprised a treatment group. Each replicate consisted of 80 zebrafish

106

(ZF) at either the embryonic (24-48 hpf) or larval (96-120 hpf) stage. All exposures were carried out for

107

24 h. No apparent toxic effects were observed during and after the exposure period in either the control

108

(embryo media [HE3] and carrier control [CC]) or treatment groups at either life stage. Water hardness

109

for the embryo media used in the heavy metal exposures was calculated to be 4.14 mg/L as CaCO3. In

110

general, the measured concentrations were in the range of their respective nominal values as reported

111

in Figure 2. The non-detects are reported as less than their limit of detection (LOD). Since these were

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 28

112

post-exposed exposure media, any decreases observed were likely due to animal uptake and losses to

113

evaporation or container adsorption. A detailed description of the fish husbandry, embryo collection,

114

exposure procedures, and chemical analysis of post-exposure media is provided in the Supporting

115

Information.

116 117

Metabolite Analysis

118

A suite of 208 metabolites was measured from whole body ZF embryo/larvae, including 21

119

amino acids (AA), 21 biogenic amines (BAs), 4 bile acids, ∑hexose, 17 faTy acids (FAs), 40 acylcarniUnes

120

(ACs), 89 phosphatidylcholine (PCs), and 15 sphingomyelins (SMs). A full list of the analytes, internal

121

standards, and abbreviations is provided in Table S3. Instrumental analysis was performed on an Agilent

122

1100 high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system coupled to an API4000 triple quadruple

123

mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada). A detailed description of the

124

metabolite extraction, instrumental analysis, quality control, and statistical analyses can be found in the

125

Supporting Information.

126 127

Results and Discussion

128

Morphological effects

129

There were no significant differences in hatchability, phenotype, and mortality in zebrafish (ZF)

130

embryos exposed at 24-48 hpf. However, in the larvae, the highest concentration of CuSO4 (7.1 μM) and

131

CdCl2 (5 μM) induced lateral recumbence in approximately 10% of the exposed animals. Cu and Cd have

132

previously been reported to induce locomotor deficit in ZF larvae. For example, Johnson et al.16 reported

133

that a 72 h exposure to 3.8 μM Cu reduced neuromast abundance in 120 hpf ZF, an effect associated

134

with a reduced ability to orientate in a current. The dose used is comparable to the 3.1 μM Cu dose in

135

the present study, when differences in water hardness and exposure period are accounted for. Exposure

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

136

to Cd has also been shown to affect muscle development and axon growth in ZF embryos resulting in

137

reduced motility.17 No significant mortality or other observable phenotypic changes (>5%) were noted in

138

the remaining ZF larvae exposures; thus, the chemical concentration ranges used in the current study

139

are sublethal.

140 141

Stage-specific metabolomic response

142

For triiodothyronine (T3), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), bisphenol A (BPA), refined

143

merichem (RM), and triclosan (TCS), the metabolomic responses were compared at two different

144

developmental stages (embryonic and larval). Since the embryonic stage coincides with the onset of

145

organogenesis,18 we expected this developmental stage to be more sensitive to chemical exposure.

146

Surprisingly, this was not the case. The number of affected metabolites in the 24-48 hpf exposure

147

experiments ranged from one in PFOS and RM exposed embryos to 15 in BPA-treated embryos (mostly

148

acylcarnitines) (Table 1; top). TCS did not induce any significant metabolite changes in the embryos.

149

Amino acids, bile acids, SMs, and hexose were not affected by any chemical groups at this life stage. In

150

contrast, the larvae displayed a number of significantly changed metabolites (Padj