Subscriber access provided by EPFL | Scientific Information and Libraries
Article
An Effective Design of Electrically Conducting Thin-Film Composite (TFC) Membranes for Bio and Organic Fouling Control in Forward Osmosis (FO) Qing Liu, Guanglei Qiu, Zhengzhong Zhou, Jingguo Li, Gary Lee Amy, Jianping Xie, and Jim Yang Lee Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03402 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Sep 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 9, 2016
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
1
An Effective Design of Electrically Conducting Thin-Film Composite
2
(TFC) Membranes for Bio and Organic Fouling Control in Forward
3
Osmosis (FO)
4
Qing Liu a, Guanglei Qiu a, Zhengzhong Zhou a, Jingguo Li a, Gary Lee Amy a, b, Jianping Xie a*, Jim
5
Yang Lee a*
6
a
7
Ridge Crescent, Singapore, 119260.
8
b
Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent
College of Engineering and Science, Clemson University, Clemson SC 29634 USA
9 10
*
Corresponding author:
11
E-mail:
[email protected] &
[email protected].
12
Phone: (65) 65162899
13
Fax: (65) 6779193
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 2 of 35
14
ABSTRACT: The organic foulants and bacteria in secondary wastewater treatment can seriously
15
impair the membrane performance in a water treatment plant. The embedded electrode approach using
16
an externally applied potential to repel organic foulants and inhibit bacterial adhesion can effectively
17
reduce the frequency of membrane replacement. Electrode embedment in membranes is often carried
18
out by dispensing a conductor (e.g. carbon nanotubes, or CNTs) in the membrane substrate, which gives
19
rise to two problems: the leaching-out of the conductor and a percolation-limited membrane
20
conductivity that results in an added energy cost. This study presents a facile method for the embedment
21
of a continuous electrode in thin-film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membranes. Specifically,
22
a conducting porous carbon paper is used as the understructure for the formation of a membrane
23
substrate by the classical phase inversion process. The carbon paper and the membrane substrate
24
polymer form an interpenetrating structure with good stability and low electrical resistance (only about
25
1Ω/ ). The membrane-electrode assembly was deployed as the cathode of an electrochemical cell, and
26
showed good resistance to organic and microbial fouling with the imposition of a 2.0V DC voltage. The
27
carbon paper-based FO TFC membranes also possess good mechanical stability for practical use.
28
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
29
INTRODUCTION
30
Forward osmosis (FO) used in conjunction with other membrane processes can significantly
31
increase the overall energy efficiency in membrane water desalination and wastewater reuse1-5.
32
In the FO process, water is drawn from the feed solution (low osmotic pressure) to the draw
33
solution (high osmotic pressure) by the osmotic pressure gradient across a semipermeable
34
membrane. Due to the asymmetry in the FO membrane structure, there are two operating modes
35
in a FO process: the AL-FS mode (where the active layer is facing the feed solution) or the AL-
36
DS mode (where the active layer is facing the draw solution). Generally, water flux is higher in
37
the AL-DS mode due to a smaller internal concentration polarization6-14. The AL-DS mode can
38
also be used for osmotic pressure generation (the pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) process). The
39
AL-DS mode however has a higher fouling tendency since the foulants in the feed solution can
40
easily enter the porous membrane substrate.
41
Biopolymers, proteins, and microbes are the predominant foulants in the FO treatment of
42
secondary wastewater15. The organic compounds can adsorb on the membrane exterior surface
43
and on the porous membrane interior to form a gel layer, which not only plugs the pores to lead
44
to a water flux reduction, but also causes bacterial growth16.
45
polymeric substances (EPS) during the bacterial growth could culminate in biofilm formation.
46
The biofilm under the protection of EPS is stubbornly resistant to physical and chemical
47
cleaning17, 20-23. It is still a challenge to design FO membranes which are resistant to both organic
48
and bacterial fouling.
49
The enhancement of membrane hydrophilicity is commonly used to improve the membrane
50
fouling resistance. It is reported that antifouling properties are derived from the strong hydration
The release of extracellular
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 4 of 35
51
layer on a hydrophilic surface, which inhibits the adsorption of foulants23-26. Since the majority
52
of organic foulants are negatively charged27, the other commonly used method is to impart
53
negative charge to the membrane surface to electrostatically repel the adhesion of negatively
54
charged organic foulants and bacteria28. The fabrication of hydrophilic or negatively charged
55
membranes is often complex and has so far been targeted mostly at organic foulants29-34.
56
Biofouling resistance, on the other hand, is often addressed by adding antimicrobial
57
nanomaterials to a membrane formulation35-37. The stability and durability of the modified
58
membranes is often an issue due to the leachability of the biocides, which becomes a source of
59
secondary contamination.
60
An alternative method to alter and introduce charges to a membrane surface is the application of
61
an external potential, which has shown good antifouling properties38, 39. The membrane needs to
62
be modified with a conductor to allow the application of an electric potential for microbial
63
control but without the loss of the desired membrane properties40-50. Among the different
64
additives that have been used to produce composite conducting membranes, the highly
65
conducting CNTs are the most common. In the study by Vecitis et al., a PTFE filter coated with
66
CNTs was used as the anode. The application of a 3 V DC voltage was found to be effective for
67
annihilating bacteria and viruses43. Direct anodic oxidation and indirect oxidation of bacteria by
68
the aqueous oxidants formed in anodic oxidation were proposed as the bacteria inactivation
69
mechanisms. Lannoy et al. reported a thin film composite (TFC) membrane with cross-linked
70
CNTs in the polyamide (PA) selective layer. Improved biofouling resistance was shown with the
71
application of 1.5V AC49. The authors theorized that an alternating potential causes instabilities
72
in the local pH and the electrical double layer, thus creating a non-ideal environment for bacterial
73
growth. In addition, bacteria are repelled by an applied negative potential and oxidized by a 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
74
positive applied potential. This bacterial inhibition mechanism was also mentioned in the study
75
of Ronen et al. 41 where the bacterial growth on CNTs-PVA composite membranes was reduced
76
by a -1.5V applied potential. The authors suggested that bacterial inhibition was due to the H2O2
77
formed in the cathodic reaction of oxygen reduction.
78
The anti-organic fouling properties of CNT-incorporated composite conducting membranes have
79
also been examined with the application of a DC voltage. In the work of Zhang et al on CNT-
80
containing ultrafiltration (UF) membranes45, the authors attributed the fouling reduction with the
81
application of a negative potential to the increased energy barrier and the decreased collision
82
efficiency of negatively charged organic matters with the membrane surface. The composite
83
CNT-UF membranes were also used in the Dudchenko study40. These conducting membranes
84
when used as the cathode were able to reduce fouling by polyacrylic acid (PAA) at a moderate
85
applied potential (3-5V). However, different from bacterial inactivation, a positive applied
86
potential aggravated the organic fouling. These observations corroborated the electrostatic
87
repulsion mechanism proposed by Zhang et al. in their study45.
88
The above studies showed that membranes which are rendered conducting by CNTs can reduce
89
organic fouling by applying a small negative potential, while bacterial attachment can be
90
inhibited by applying a small positive or negative potential. These conducting membranes are
91
often produced by the “blending” or “coating” methods. The conducting additives often present
92
themselves as a dispersed phase, which gives rise to two potential issues: the possibility of CNT
93
leaching (unless covalently bonded); and a percolation-limited conductivity improvement. Thus
94
it is hypothesized that a contiguous phase of conducting materials should provide a better long-
95
term stability and greater conductivity enhancements. In addition, since organic fouling and 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 6 of 35
96
microbial fouling are performance limiting factors in the water treatment process, this study not
97
only investigated the membrane resistance to microbial deposition and growth, but also the
98
membrane resistance to organic foulants; in the presence of a low and negative applied potential.
99
Carbon paper with a porous architecture and good conductivity is often used as the diffusion
100
layer in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. It has also been used as the electrode for
101
electrochemical disinfection51. Herein, we have designed polyethersulfone (PES) FO TFC
102
membranes with carbon paper as the continuous conducting phase. Specifically, a conducting
103
porous carbon paper is used as the understructure for the formation of the membrane substrate by
104
the classical phase inversion process. The carbon paper and the substrate polymer form an
105
interpenetrating structure with good stability and low electrical resistance (at only 1Ω/ ). The
106
conductivity of the composite membrane can be as high as 5500S/m. This membrane-electrode
107
assembly was deployed as the cathode of an electrochemical cell, and good organic and
108
microbial fouling resistance was shown with the imposition of a 2.0V DC voltage. Furthermore,
109
these carbon paper-based polymer membranes also have significantly improved mechanical
110
properties, which are important for their practical use.
111
EXPERIMENTAL
112
Materials
113
Radel
114
polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG, Mn=400g/mol) from Merck; m-phenylenediamine (MPD, >
115
99%), 1,3,5-benzenetricarbonyl trichloride (TMC, 98%), n-hexanes (>99.9%), sodium alginate,
116
sodium chloride and fluorescein isothiocynateconjugated bovine serum albumin (BSA-FITC)
®
A PES from Solvay Advanced Polymers; N-methyl-2-pyrrolodinone (NMP, >99.5%),
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
117
from Sigma-Aldrich, Carbon paper (NOS1005) from CeTech, were used as received. De-ionized
118
(DI) water was produced by a Milli-Q ultrapure water system (Millipore, USA).
119
Membrane preparation
120
The pristine PES membrane substrate was formed by the Loeb-Sourirajan phase inversion
121
method. In brief, the PES polymer after drying in vacuum overnight (for moisture removal) was
122
mixed with PEG-400, NMP and water in the ratio of PES: PEG: NMP: water = 20:37.9:37.9:4.2
123
(wt.%) to form a casting dope. The dope after overnight degassing was cast onto a glass plate
124
with a casting knife. The as-cast membrane was quickly immersed in a room temperature water
125
coagulation bath and kept in DI water for 24 h to ensure complete precipitation.
126
For the preparation of carbon paper-containing PES membranes, a carbon paper was placed on
127
the glass plate and the dope was cast onto the carbon paper instead (Figure S1). All other steps
128
were the same as in the preparation of pristine PES membranes. The carbon paper-containing
129
PES membrane was designated as Car-PES.
130
A PA selective layer was formed on the membrane top face by the following procedure: a
131
membrane substrate was immersed in a 2wt% MPD aqueous solution for 1min. The excess MPD
132
solution was carefully removed from the membrane surface with a filter paper. This was
133
followed by contacting the same membrane surface with a 0.1wt% TMC solution in n-hexane for
134
30s. The TFC membrane fabricated as such was air-dried for 5min and then stored in DI water.
135
Membrane characterization
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 8 of 35
136
Membrane morphology was examined by field-emission scanning electron microscopy
137
(FESEM). The membrane sample for microscopy examination was freeze-dried, cryo-fractured
138
in liquid nitrogen, and then surface coated with Pt. A JSM 6700F (JEOL, Japan) microscope
139
operating at 5kV accelerating voltage was used for the FESEM. Water contact angle
140
measurements were carried at room temperature, using a Contact Angle Goniometer (Rame
141
Hart) and Milli-Q deionized probe liquid to evaluate the hydrophilicity of the membrane
142
substrate. The mechanical properties of the membrane substrate were measured by an Instron
143
5542 tensile test equipment. A flat sheet membrane was cut into 5 mm wide stripes and clamped
144
at the both ends. The initial gauge length of 30 mm was stretched at the rate of 10 mm/min. At
145
least five stripes were tested for each casting condition to obtain the mean values of membrane
146
tensile stress, Young’s modulus and elongation at break. A four-point conductivity probe
147
(Signatone S-302-4) was used for the measurements of electrical sheet resistance.
148
A dead end stainless steel RO filtration cell was used to measure the substrate water permeability
149
(A). The effective membrane area in the cell was 9.62 cm2. Water permeability A was calculated
150
from the pure water permeation flux under a transmembrane pressure of 3 bar by equation 1
151
where Jv is the volumetric water flux and ∆P is the applied hydraulic pressure.
A=
Jv ∆P
(1)
152
Membrane substrate porosity ε, defined as the total pore volume divided by the membrane
153
volume, was determined by a gravimetric method and calculated as follows: (w2-w1) ρ1 ε=
(2) 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
154
where w1 is the dry weight of PES substrate membrane, w2 is total weight of substrate saturated
155
with water. Vm is the total volume of the membrane.
156
The mean (µp) and the standard deviation (σp) of the effective pore size of each membrane
157
substrate were measured by the solute rejection method with a dead-end stainless steel RO
158
filtration set-up. 1 bar of pressure was applied to a 200 ppm solution of a neutral solute (PEG or
159
polyethyleneoxide (PEO)) to permeate the solute through the membrane. The solute
160
concentrations in the feed and in the permeate were measured by a total organic carbon analyzer
161
(TOCASI-5000A, Shimadzu, Japan). A more detailed description of the measurement
162
procedures can be found in the open literature 52.
163
The FO performance of membrane was measured by the water flux (Jv in L/m2h, or LMH) and
164
reverse salt flux (Js in g/m2h, or gMH) calculated from the following equations. Jv=
∆V 1 (5) ∆t Am
Js=
(CtVt)-(C0V0) 1 ∆t Am
(6)
165
where ∆V(L) is the volume of water permeated through the membrane in a given period of time
166
∆t (h), Am is the effective membrane surface area (m2). Ct and Vt are the salt concentration (g/L)
167
and the volume of the feed solution (L) at the end of the FO test respectively. Their
168
corresponding values at the start of the experiment are C0 and V0. Salt concentrations were again
169
measured conductometrically. The dilution of the draw solution in the experiments was
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 10 of 35
170
negligible since the amount of water permeated to the draw solution was less than 1% of the
171
latter.
172
Microbial fouling on the FO TFC membranes
173
Gram-negative E-coli and Gram-positive S. aureus strain were used to evaluate the membrane
174
bacterial resistance. E-coli and S.aureus were cultured in a Lysogeny broth (LB) and incubated
175
in an Isotemp incubator (Fisher Scientific, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) overnight at 37℃ (shaking
176
speed: 150rpm). The culture was centrifuged at 3000rpm for 10min, and the precipitated pellet
177
was re-suspended in a LB solution. The cell suspension prepared as such was used as the
178
bacterial stock solution, and was diluted to 107colony-forming units (CFU)/ml before use. Each
179
PES and Car-PES membrane was immersed in the bacterial suspension for 4 hours. Meanwhile,
180
a negative potential (-2V) was also applied to a Car-PES membrane in the bacterial suspension
181
under the same condition. The value of -2V was determined after a limited scoping experiment
182
and provided the “best” membrane performance without any gas liberation. The bacteria adhered
183
to the membrane back surface was examined by SEM. This involved fixing the bacteria in the
184
membrane with a 3vol.% glutaraldehyde phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution at 4°C,
185
followed by rinsing with PBS solution several times to remove the excess glutaraldehyde. The
186
“fixed” samples were dehydrated with ethanol solutions (25, 50, 75 and 100v/v), air-dried, and
187
coated with platinum (20mA, 30s) for SEM examination. The quantifications of bacterial
188
adhesion and viability on the membrane substrate were carried out by the spread plate method. A
189
membrane sample was put in 5ml of PBS, followed by ultrasonication for 7min to remove the
190
loose bacterial deposit on the sample surface. The bacterial solution was sequentially diluted, and
191
spread on the agar plate. The colonies were counted after 24h of growth. The inactivation rates 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
192
were calculated by comparing the cell density of the Car-PES membranes with that of the PES
193
membrane.
194
Two additional tests were also used to evaluate the effect of microbial fouling on membrane
195
performance under simulated operating conditions. In the stationary test, a membrane sample
196
after the FO test was immersed in the E-coli and S.aureus suspension for 3 days. The bacterial
197
suspension was refreshed every 24 h in order to maintain a constant desired bacterial
198
concentration. The membrane FO performance was measured again after a 3-day period and
199
washing with PBS. In the continuous microbial fouling test, the AL-DS orientation was chosen
200
because of its high water flux and a greater fouling propensity. The set-up shown in Figure S2
201
was used to apply the potential to the Car-PES membrane. The same set-up without the applied
202
potential was used for the control PES and Car-PES membranes. Prior to fouling the water flux
203
through the membrane was measured with a DI water feed and a 2 M NaCl draw solution for 1h.
204
The DI water was then replaced with a LB solution containing 107 CFU/ml of E-coli. After the
205
fouling test, the membrane was cleaned by flowing DI water at 0.1 L/min on both sides of the
206
membrane. The water flux through the membrane was then re-measured with DI water (feed
207
solution) and 2 M NaCl solution (draw solution). Baseline experiments were conducted under the
208
same conditions using a LB solution without the bacteria. All processes were operated at room
209
temperature (20 ± 1) °C.
210
Protein adsorption on membranes
211
BSA-FITC solution was used to measure the protein adsorption behavior of FO TFC membranes.
212
A membrane was rinsed initially with a PBS solution and then soaked in the BSA-FITC solution
213
(0.5 mg/mL PBS solution) at room temperature for 1 h. The adsorption was imaged by a Leica 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 12 of 35
214
DMLM fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with an
215
excitation filter of 495 nm and an emission filter of 525 nm.
216
Organic fouling of FO TFC membranes
217
The organic fouling of the membranes was evaluated on the same laboratory-scale FO setup at
218
the AL-DS orientation. Since natural surface water contains not only organic foulants but also
219
dissolved salts, the alginate solutions were also prepared to contain 4 mM NaCl. The NaCl
220
concentration was chosen to emulate the conductivity of typical natural surface water (150-500
221
µs cm-1, corresponding to 1-4mM NaCl). In this continuous fouling test, the feed was DI water or
222
the foulant solution (400ppm alginate + 4mM NaCl) and the draw solution was 2M NaCl
223
solution. The feed and the draw solution flew counter-currently to each other at room
224
temperature (20 ± 1) °C at a flow rate of 0.1 L/min. Prior to the test, the FO membrane was
225
stabilized and tested with DI water for 1h. To initiate the fouling test, the DI water feed was
226
replaced with the foulant solution. Control experiments were carried out under the same
227
conditions in the absence of foulants. 12 hours later, the membrane was cleaned for 1h by
228
running a FO process using DI water as the feed and the draw solution at 0.1L/min. The FO
229
performance of the cleaned membrane was retested again with a DI water feed and a 2M NaCl
230
draw solution.
231
RESULT & DISCUSSION
232
Substrate characterizations
233
The preparation of a FO-TFC membrane on carbon paper was a facile process, similar to the
234
preparation of a TFC membrane. In this design the carbon paper provided the continuum for 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
235
electron conduction. This can be seen from the SEM image of a typical carbon paper in Figure
236
S3 where the carbon fibers interwove into a connected network. The pore size of the carbon
237
paper was hundreds of µm large, and hence it is reasonable to expect the PES polymer could
238
easily infiltrate the pores of the carbon paper during casting. Figure 1 shows the morphologies of
239
a pristine PES membrane versus a Car-PES membrane as examined by FESEM. The pristine
240
PES membrane was cast to almost the same thickness as the carbon paper (~ 200 µm). The PES
241
membrane showed the characteristic finger-like cavities with a denser top layer. The Car-PES
242
membrane was morphologically different showing a distinct two layer structure: a thin (~10 µm)
243
dense PES layer in the membrane top surface; and PES-infused carbon fibers in the membrane
244
bottom layer (~ 190 µm). The morphology and the cross-section of the top layer were the same
245
in both membranes, which is to be expected since there were no carbon fibers in this layer. The
246
dense top layer structure was formed by the rapid solvent outflow to the surrounding water when
247
a nascent membrane was immersed in the coagulation bath. Consequently the PA layers formed
248
by IP on the membrane top surface were also similar (Figure S4), suggesting that the presence of
249
a carbon paper in the composite membrane would not affect the membrane selectivity. The
250
presence of the carbon paper, however, created a very different bottom layer. The large pores in
251
the PES back surface ~100 µm in size were caused by the incoming water flux being faster than
252
the outgoing solvent (NMP) flux in phase inversion. For the Car-PES membrane, the PES
253
polymer and the carbon fibers formed an interlocked structure. However, the presence of the
254
carbon paper inhibited the water influx in phase inversion and disrupted the formation of the
255
finger-like porous structure. On the other hand, the pores in the carbon paper were not
256
completely occupied by PES due to filling from the top. Thus some pores in the Car-PES
257
membrane back surface were larger than those in the PES membrane. The interlocking carbon13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 14 of 35
258
PES structure is expected to improve the membrane stability in water treatment since the
259
mechanically more robust carbon paper could adhere strongly to the membrane.
260 261
Figure 1: Morphologies of the cross-section, top and bottom surfaces of PES (a, c, e) and Car-
262
PES membrane substrate (b, d, f)
263
Membrane durability is determined by its mechanical strength, which can be undermined by the
264
defects formed in a membrane fabrication process. The measurements of the mechanical
265
strengths of the PES and Car-PES membranes (Table 1); however, allayed such a concern.
266
Instead the Car-PES substrate was mechanically strong; showing significantly enhanced
267
mechanical properties to surpass the PES membrane, the carbon paper, and all of the previously
268
reported polymer membranes. The interlocking structure is the most likely reason for the synergy
269
in integrating PES with carbon paper.
270
271 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
272
Material
Young’s modulus/MPa
Tensile strength/ MPa
Elongation at break /%
PES
152.0±22.4
4.2±0.6
17.1±4.3
Car-PES
5520.0±420.5
23.6±1.3
0.5±0.2
Carbon paper
2610.2±205.6
8.3±0.7
0.6±0.3
273
Table 1: Mechanical properties of PES and Car-PES membranes and carbon paper
274
The water permeability (A) of PES and Car-PES membranes was evaluated in a RO filtration
275
set-up. It can be seen that water permeability was slightly higher for the Car-PES membrane. It is
276
well known that in a pressure driven process like RO, water permeability is mainly determined
277
by the membrane porosity and pore size4. While Table S1 shows comparable porosities for the
278
two membranes; the average effective pore size was slightly larger for the Car-PES membrane.
279
Its larger standard deviation also suggests a broader pore size distribution. This is consistent with
280
the SEM images in Figure 1 where some large pores can be easily found on the Car-PES
281
substrate back surface.
282
The inclusion of a carbon paper in the membrane might bring about two structural effects that
283
could impact the membrane water flux. One was the suppression of the membrane finger-like
284
structure leading to lower porosity and reduced water flux, while the other was the creation of
285
enlarged pores which increased porosity, reduced tortuosity and increased water flux. The two
286
effects were mutually compensating to result in an incidental increase in the water flux.
287
Contact angle measurements were carried out next to evaluate the membrane hydrophilicity.
288
Table S1 shows that the contact angles on the membrane top surface were quite close; which is 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 16 of 35
289
to be expected due to the likeness of the PES and Car-PES and PES membrane top layers. More
290
interestingly, despite the hydrophobic nature of the carbon fibers, the contact angle on the back
291
surface of Car-PES was only slightly higher than that of PES. This is indication of the
292
encapsulation of the carbon fibers by the infiltrated PES polymer. Previous research has shown
293
that the water flux in FO water is constrained by internal concentration polarization (ICP), which
294
depends on the water permeability and substrate hydrophilicity52-55. A more hydrophilic substrate
295
not only facilitates water and salt transport but also suppresses air bubble formation in the
296
substrate to increase the effective porosity and reduce the ICP. The comparable porosity and
297
contact angle of PES and Car-PES is a good sign since it implies that the inclusion of the
298
conducting carbon paper would not bring about an adverse effect to the FO water flux.
299
The electrical properties of the composite conducting membrane are important to the use of
300
external potential for fouling control. The sheet resistance of the Car-PES membrane as
301
measured by the four point probe method was a low 1.0 Ω/ . This compares very favorably to
302
previous work using CNTs where the sheet resistance was a high 6000 Ω/
303
connectivity of dispersed CNTs in an insulating polymer matrix. The conductivity of the Car-
304
PES membrane calculated from the measured sheet resistance and a membrane thickness of 180
305
µm was 5500S/m.
306
The FO performance of PES and Car-PES TFC membranes
307
The water flux and the reverse salt flux of the PES and Car-PES TFC membranes in FO were
308
measured in a conventional FO set-up using a DI water feed solution and a 2M NaCl draw
309
solution. The membrane performance was evaluated in two typical membrane orientations (AL-
310
FS and AL-DS) and the results are summarized in Figure 2. In comparison with the PES
48
due to the poor
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
311
membrane, the FO water flux and the reverse salt flux of the Car-PES membrane showed a slight
312
decrease. As mentioned earlier, the carbon paper inclusion could bring about two effects: an
313
increase in water permeability (A) in RO and a decrease in hydrophilicity (stronger ICP effect).
314
The measured FO data were the result of a balance of these two competing factors.
315 316
Figure 2: FO performance of PES and Car-PES TFC membranes: (a) water flux; (b) reverse salt
317
flux
318
Microbial resistance of PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES TFC membranes
319
The pristine PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES TFC membranes were fouled with
320
two model bacteria: S.aureus which is gram-positive and E-coli which is gram-negative. The
321
SEM images in Figure 3 were taken after the membranes were exposed to the bacterial
322
suspensions for 4h. The deposition and growth of the E-coli and S.aureus bacteria was extensive
323
on the PES and Car-PES membranes. These bacteria also tended to form colonies on the
324
membrane surface resulting in pore plugging. By comparison, when a -2V DC voltage was
325
applied to the Car-PES membrane, a very clean membrane surface was obtained. Only a few
326
bacteria were found on the surface without colony formation or pore plugging. Hence an 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 18 of 35
327
electrically negatively charged membrane could effectively repel bacteria to inhibit their
328
deposition and growth.
329 330
Figure 3: SEM images of bacterial deposition and growth on the PES, Car-PES and electrically
331
charged Car-PES TFC membranes.
332
The antimicrobial properties of the membranes were evaluated by a quantitative antifouling
333
assay using the spread plate method. Figure 4 shows that the amount of viable bacteria was
334
somewhat higher on the Car-PES membrane. This could be due to the slightly more hydrophobic
335
surface of the Car-PES membrane found earlier in the contact angle measurements. A
336
hydrophobic surface is known to promote the interaction between the bacteria and the membrane
337
surface. The electrically charged Car-PES membrane, on the other hand, showed a substantial
338
decrease of bacterial adhesion, reducing the adherent fraction to only about 10%. The
339
mechanism of bacterial inhibition in a low potential is still not well understood, and different
340
theories about the application of positive or negative surface charge have been proposed. In this
341
study where the applied potential was negative, the major mechanism of bacterial inhibition 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
342
should be the like-charge electrostatic repulsion between bacteria and a negatively charged
343
membrane surface, which has been proven to effectively repel bacterial approach and prevent
344
biofilm formation
345
of H2O2 by the electrochemical reduction of oxygen. Ronen et al. have shown that the
346
electrochemically produced H2O2 could decrease microbial cell viability and increase cell
347
membrane permeability. A microscopic amount of H2O2 near the membrane surface could be
348
sufficiently lethal to the bacteria to inhibit biofilm formation in a membrane filtration
349
operation41.
49, 56
. However we could not rule out the formation of a microscopic amount
350 351
Figure 4: The static bacteria adhesion behavior of S.aureus and E.coli on PES, Car-PES and
352
electrically charged Car-PES TFC membranes
353
In order to examine the effects of bacterial attachment on the performance of these FO
354
membranes in water treatment, a comparison of the water flux (Figure 5) and the reverse salt flux
355
(Figure S5) before and after bacterial attachment was carried out after a brief physical wash. For
356
the PES and Car-PES membranes, the water flux decrease of over 50% was caused by serious 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 20 of 35
357
fouling by bacterial colonies and biofilm formation. On the contrary, water flux recovery was
358
almost 100% for the negatively charged Car-PES membrane, consistent with the SEM
359
observation of very limited bacterial deposition and growth. While no current flow and no gas
360
liberation were detected, we still could not rule out the possible formation of a microscopic
361
amount of H2O2.
362 363
Figure 5: Effects of microbial fouling on the water flux of PES, Car-PES and electrically charged
364
Car-PES TFC membranes
365
Prior to the continuous microbial fouling test, baseline measurements were carried out to
366
quantify the water flux reduction due to the adsorption of compounds from the LB solution
367
and the decrease in osmotic pressure gradient caused by draw solution dilution and feed
368
solution concentration. The baseline curves for the PES and Car-PES membranes trended
369
similarly, showing about 10% water flux reduction over 24h of operation (Figure S6). The
370
biofouling resistance of these membranes was measured in continuous FO tests using a LB
371
suspension of E-coli as the feed to simulate biological wastewater, and compared with the 20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
372
membrane performance in DI water. The results showed ~80% of water flux decrease for both
373
PES and Car-PES membranes in 24h (Figure 6). This substantial reduction should again be
374
attributed to bacterial growth and biofilm formation. In the AL-DS orientation, bacterial
375
deposition occurred in the membrane substrate, and was difficult to remove by physical
376
washing due to the lack of shear forces in the membrane structure. Consequently, the
377
water flux of these two membranes could only restore to ~30% of its initial value after
378
cleaning (Figure S7). The electrically charged Car-PES membrane fared much better by
379
comparison, showing about 30% of water flux decrease in 24h (Figure 6); and 84%
380
recovery of the initial water flux after cleaning (Figure S7). These measurements are
381
consistent with the result from SEM observations, verifying that bacteria could barely
382
deposit and grow on the electrically charged membrane.
383 384
Figure 6: Comparison of membrane resistance to microbial fouling with bacteria LB suspension
385
as feed solution. The draw solution was 2M NaCl. The flow rates on both sides of the membrane
386
were 0.1L/min. 21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 22 of 35
387
Adsorption of organic foulants on PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES TFC
388
membranes
389
Protein adsorption resistance is a common test for evaluating the anti-organic fouling
390
performance of water treatment membranes. Hence the PES, Car-PES and electrically charged
391
Car-PES TFC membranes after exposure to a fluorescent BSA-FITC protein solution (0.5
392
mg/ml) for 1 hour were examined with a fluorescence microscope. Figure 7 showed that such
393
treatment conditions caused the complete coverage of the pristine PES membrane with BSA
394
molecules, which gave rise to a strong fluorescence. This is consistent with previous studies that
395
the hydrophobic-hydrophobic interactions between the benzene rings of PES and protein
396
molecules would promote BSA adsorption34. Since carbon paper did not show any affinity for
397
BSA adsorption, the strong fluorescence of the Car-PES membrane is another indication of the
398
encapsulation of the carbon fibers by the PES polymer; and the permeation of the BSA
399
molecules through the pore system of the carbon paper. However, in the presence of an
400
externally applied negative potential, the adsorption of the BSA was greatly suppressed and
401
fluorescence was barely visible. The applied potential was therefore successful in repelling the
402
BSA molecules from the membrane surface.
403 404
Figure 7: Protein adsorption on PES (a), Car-PES (b) and electrically charged Car-PES (c)
405
membranes 22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
406
Effects of organic fouling on the performance of PES, Car-PES and electrically charged
407
Car-PES TFC membranes
408
Prior to the fouling test, a baseline experiment was also carried out using 4mM NaCl solution as
409
the feed solution and 2M NaCl as the draw solution, in order to correct for the effects of draw
410
solution dilution and feed solution concentration. The water flux during the 12 hour test was
411
approximately constant, and the final water flux through both membranes was about 94% of the
412
initial water flux (Figure S8). The organic fouling in FO was tested using a general model
413
organic foulant, alginic acid. With a pKa of 3.21, alginate acid could easily ionize in water to
414
provide an abundance of alginate anions. Prior to the addition of alginate, the membrane was
415
conditioned by running FO with a DI water feed for 1 h. After alginate fouling, the membrane
416
was washed with DI water for 1h, and the draw solution was restored to the initial concentration.
417
As shown in Figure 8, the water flux through the PES and Car-PES membranes decreased
418
significantly and immediately after the addition of alginate to the feed solution. The permeate
419
drag carried the alginate to the selective PA layer through the porous substrate; causing alginate
420
accumulation in the porous membrane substrate. The water flux through the PES and Car-PES
421
membranes declined gradually with the accumulation of alginate, and was about 42% and 48%
422
of the initial water flux respectively at the end of the test. The more severe fouling of the Car-
423
PES membrane could be associated with its slightly more hydrophobic character. By comparison
424
the Car-PES membrane with the application of a negative potential showed a much smaller water
425
flux decline (17 %) over the same period of time due to the like-charge repulsion between the
426
alginate anions and the externally applied potential. It should be noted that some positive ions
427
might adsorb on the membrane surface and neutralized part of the membrane surface charge45.
428
However, the experimental results showed that within the scope of this study, the application of a 23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 24 of 35
429
2V potential was sufficient to reject the anionic organic foulants even with the presence of
430
positive ions.
431 432
Figure 8: Comparison of membrane resistance to organic fouling in a feed solution with 400 ppm
433
alginate. The draw solution was 2M NaCl. The flow rates on both sides of the membrane were
434
0.1L/min.
435
The fouled membranes was washed with DI water for 1h, and then retested for their FO
436
performance using a DI water feed. Figure S9 shows the results of water recovery. The water
437
flux could return to 64% of its initial performance for the PES membrane. For the Car-PES
438
membrane, the value was about 60%. While the alginate on the membrane surface could be
439
removed by a washing regiment, the alginate within the porous membrane substrate could not.
440
On the contrary, the water flux for the electrically charged Car-PES membrane could be restored
441
to about 92% of its initial value, similar to the results of the baseline experiment (Figure S9).
442
This is indication that under an externally applied potential, alginate could only be loosely held 24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
443
by the membrane surface and as such was easily removable by physical washing. In addition, the
444
test for membrane selectivity showed that all three membranes could retain a good selectivity
445
(Figure S9). Therefore positive ions (Na+) that might have been accumulated on the membrane
446
surface under the applied negative potential could also be removed by a simple physical wash.
447
One of the concerns in the application of an external negative potential is Ca2+ adsorption which
448
could bridge between the organic foulant (alginate) to increase the severity of alginate gelation21,
449
57, 58
450
of a control and electrically-charged PVDF membranes with embedded CNTs. Even though Ca2+
451
could in principle accelerate the fouling of the CNTs-PVDF membranes, the authors found that
452
in practice, the electrically-induced surface charge was not effective for the Ca2+ bridging of
453
organic foulants; and hence there was no increase in the fouling of the electrically charged
454
membrane in the presence of Ca2+ 45.
455
There are reports in the literature where a positive potential was used for the oxidative killing of
456
bacteria and the inhibition of biofilm formation. In actual wastewater treatment, however, the
457
application of positive charge could worsen organic fouling due to the attractive forces between
458
the membrane and the foulants40, 50. In this study, a facile method was developed to prepare
459
carbon paper-PES membranes with high electrical conductivity and enhanced mechanical
460
properties and membrane integrity (stability). When a relatively small and negative potential
461
(2V) was applied to these membranes, the deposition and growth of both gram-positive and
462
gram-negative bacteria were inhibited, which could be attributed to the repulsive forces between
463
like charges and the possible presence of a microscopic amount of H2O2 formed by
464
electrochemical oxygen reduction reaction. This electrically charged composite membrane also
. Zhang et al. added Ca2+ to the test solution to examine their effects on the fouling behavior
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 26 of 35
465
showed an increased resistance towards organic fouling as tested by the model foulant alginate.
466
The water flux decrease due to organic fouling was substantially reduced; and a very high water
467
flux recovery rate was possible after a simple physical wash. The experimental results indicated
468
that this membrane design approach (of forming TFC on an existing porous conductor rather
469
than trying to connect dispersed conductors in a polymer matrix) is effective for producing
470
energy efficient antifouling composite membranes which inhibit both microbial and organic
471
fouling with the application of a negative external potential.
472
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
473
Supporting Information: The Supporting Information is available free of charge via the Internet
474
at http://pubs.acs.org.
475
Details on the preparation process of PES and Car-PES substrates (Figure S1), the flow cell for
476
FO operations with an externally applied electric potential (Figure S2), the surface morphology
477
of carbon paper used in this study(Figure S3), surface morphology of the PA layer on PES and
478
Car-PES TFC membranes (Figure S4), effect of microbial fouling on the reverse salt flux of
479
PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES TFC membranes (Figure S5), base line
480
experiments using the LB solution and a 2M NaCl draw solution(Figure S6), water flux and
481
reverse salt flux of PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES membranes after continuous
482
microbial fouling and a brief physical wash(Figure S7), base line experiments using a 4mM
483
NaCl feed and a 2M NaCl draw solution (Figure S8), water flux and reverse salt flux of
484
organically fouled PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES membranes after a brief
485
physical wash(Figure S9), and properties of PES and Car-PES substrates (Table S1).
486 26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
487
AUTHOR INFORMATION
488
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 4
489
Engineering Drive 4, 117585, Singapore Author to whom correspondence should be addressed:
490
Email:
[email protected] &
[email protected] 491
Notes
492
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
493
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
494
The authors would like to thank the Singapore National Research Foundation for funding this
495
study through the project “Advanced FO membranes and membrane systems for wastewater
496
treatment, water reuse and seawater desalination” (R-279-000-336-281). Thanks are also
497
extended to Professor Neal TS Chung for providing the experimental equipment.
498
REFERENCES
499
1.
500
Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Desalination 2012, 287, 78-81.
501
2.
502
Where are we now? Desalination 2015, 356, 271-284.
503
3.
504
osmosis: emerging applications for greater sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, (23),
505
9824-30.
Chung, T.-S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, K. Y.; Su, J.; Ling, M. M., Forward osmosis processes:
Shaffer, D. L.; Werber, J. R.; Jaramillo, H.; Lin, S.; Elimelech, M., Forward osmosis:
Hoover, L. A.; Phillip, W. A.; Tiraferri, A.; Yip, N. Y.; Elimelech, M., Forward with
27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 28 of 35
506
4.
Zhao, S.; Zou, L.; Tang, C. Y.; Mulcahy, D., Recent developments in forward osmosis:
507
Opportunities and challenges. J. Membr. Sci.2012, 396, 1-21.
508
5.
509
(FO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO). Sep. Purif .Technol. 2015, 156, 856-860.
510
6.
511
membranes: Integration of RO- and NF-like selective layers for enhanced organic fouling
512
resistance. J. Membr. Sci.2015, 492, 147-155.
513
7.
514
concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during
515
humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci.2010, 354, (1-2), 123-133.
516
8.
517
based on layer-by-layer assembly—FO performance and fouling behavior. J. Membr. Sci.2012,
518
405-406, 20-29.
519
9.
520
in forward osmosis applications. J. Membr. Sci.2011, 382, (1-2), 308-315.
521
10.
522
membranes in forward osmosis processes. J. Membr. Sci.2016, 502, 65-75.
523
11.
524
polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)/polyacrylonitrile (PAN) hollow fiber membranes
525
for engineering osmosis processes. Desalination 2014, 335, (1), 17-26.
526
12.
527
concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci.2006, 284, (1-2),
528
237-247.
Chung, T.-S.; Luo, L.; Wan, C. F.; Cui, Y.; Amy, G., What is next for forward osmosis
Fang, W.; Liu, C.; Shi, L.; Wang, R., Composite forward osmosis hollow fiber
Tang, C. Y.; She, Q.; Lay, W. C. L.; Wang, R.; Fane, A. G., Coupled effects of internal
Qi, S.; Qiu, C. Q.; Zhao, Y.; Tang, C. Y., Double-skinned forward osmosis membranes
Zhao, S.; Zou, L.; Mulcahy, D., Effects of membrane orientation on process performance
Zhou, Z.; Lee, J. Y., Evaluating the viability of double-skin thin film composite
Chen, S. C.; Fu, X. Z.; Chung, T.-S., Fouling behaviors of polybenzimidazole (PBI)–
McCutcheon, J. R.; Elimelech, M., Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal
28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
529
13.
Gray, G. T.; McCutcheon, J. R.; Elimelech, M., Internal concentration polarization in
530
forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation. Desalination 2006, 197, (1-3), 1-8.
531
14.
532
permeable forward osmosis (FO) membranes for high osmotic pressure but viscous draw solutes.
533
J. Membr. Sci.2015, 496, 132-141.
534
15.
535
osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J. Membr. Sci.2010, 365, (1-2), 34-39.
536
16.
537
fouling resistance of forward osmosis membrane. Desalination 2013, 312, 82-87.
538
17.
539
osmosis: Measurements and mechanisms. J. Membr. Sci.2015, 493, 703-708.
540
18.
541
forward osmosis. Desalination 2013, 325, 30-36.
542
19.
543
enhanced osmotic pressure. J. Membr. Sci.2007, 295, (1-2), 11-20.
544
20.
545
Divalent Cation Diffusion in Forward Osmosis Biofouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, (22),
546
13222-9.
547
21.
548
Pressure-Retarded Osmosis due to Irreversible Biofouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, (21),
549
13050-8.
550
22.
551
Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, (4), 2448-71.
Wei, R.; Zhang, S.; Cui, Y.; Ong, R. C.; Chung, T.-S.; Helmer, B. J.; de Wit, J. S., Highly
Lee, S.; Boo, C.; Elimelech, M.; Hong, S., Comparison of fouling behavior in forward
Nguyen, A.; Azari, S.; Zou, L., Coating zwitterionic amino acid l-DOPA to increase
Kwan, S. E.; Bar-Zeev, E.; Elimelech, M., Biofouling in forward osmosis and reverse
Yoon, H.; Baek, Y.; Yu, J.; Yoon, J., Biofouling occurrence process and its control in the
Herzberg, M.; Elimelech, M., Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: Role of biofilm-
Xie, M.; Bar-Zeev, E.; Hashmi, S. M.; Nghiem, L. D.; Elimelech, M., Role of Reverse
Bar-Zeev, E.; Perreault, F.; Straub, A. P.; Elimelech, M., Impaired Performance of
Rana,
D.;
Matsuura,
T.,
Surface
modifications
for
antifouling
membranes.
29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 30 of 35
552
23.
Tiraferri, A.; Kang, Y.; Giannelis, E. P.; Elimelech, M., Highly Hydrophilic Thin-Film
553
Composite Forward Osmosis Membranes Functionalized with Surface-Tailored Nanoparticles.
554
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, (9), 5044-5053.
555
24.
556
composite forward osmosis membranes for organic fouling control: fouling behavior and
557
antifouling mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, (20), 11135-44.
558
25.
559
fabrication modification of forward osmosis membranes with a poly(ethylene glycol) block
560
copolymer for improved organic fouling resistance. J. Membr. Sci.2015, 490, 209-219.
561
26.
562
membrane processes: A review. J. Membr. Sci.2016, 499, 201-233.
563
27.
564
osmosis hollow fiber membranes with antifouling NF-like selective layer. J. Membr. Sci.2012,
565
394-395, 80-88.
566
28.
567
grafted membranes for osmotic power generation from municipal wastewater. Water Res.2015,
568
89, 50-58.
569
29.
570
chemistry and nucleophilic substitution on nitrogen: A novel approach to enhance membrane
571
fouling resistance. J. Membr. Sci.2014, 449, 50-57.
572
30.
573
and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) surface modification of thin-film composite forward osmosis
574
membranes for organic fouling control. J. Membr. Sci.2014, 450, 331-339.
Tiraferri, A.; Kang, Y.; Giannelis, E. P.; Elimelech, M., Superhydrophilic thin-film
Shaffer, D. L.; Jaramillo, H.; Romero-Vargas Castrillón, S.; Lu, X.; Elimelech, M., Post-
She, Q.; Wang, R.; Fane, A. G.; Tang, C. Y., Membrane fouling in osmotically driven
Setiawan, L.; Wang, R.; Li, K.; Fane, A. G., Fabrication and characterization of forward
Li, X.; Cai, T.; Chen, C.; Chung, T. S., Negatively charged hyperbranched polyglycerol
Yu, H.-Y.; Kang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Mi, B., Grafting polyzwitterions onto polyamide by click
Romero-Vargas Castrillón, S.; Lu, X.; Shaffer, D. L.; Elimelech, M., Amine enrichment
30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 31 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
575
31.
Li, X.; Cai, T.; Chung, T. S., Anti-fouling behavior of hyperbranched polyglycerol-
576
grafted poly(ether sulfone) hollow fiber membranes for osmotic power generation. Environ. Sci.
577
Technol. 2014, 48, (16), 9898-907.
578
32.
579
film nanocomposite membrane in reducing organic fouling in forward osmosis process.
580
Desalination 2014, 348, 82-88.
581
33.
582
Elimelech, M., In situ formation of silver nanoparticles on thin-film composite reverse osmosis
583
membranes for biofouling mitigation. Water Res.2014, 62, 260-70.
584
34.
585
Silver Decoration on Graphene Oxide-Treated Thin Film Composite Forward Osmosis
586
Membranes: Biocidal Properties and Regeneration Potential. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2016, 3,
587
(1), 13-18.
588
35.
589
Implications for Membrane Fouling Control in Engineered Osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016,
590
50, (2), 685-93.
591
36.
592
the Loading of Antimicrobial Ag Nanoparticles in Forward Osmosis Membranes. ACS Sustain.
593
Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, (11), 2959-2966.
594
37.
595
membrane for forward osmosis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, (13), 6781-6786.
Emadzadeh, D.; Lau, W. J.; Matsuura, T.; Hilal, N.; Ismail, A. F., The potential of thin
Ben-Sasson, M.; Lu, X.; Bar-Zeev, E.; Zodrow, K. R.; Nejati, S.; Qi, G.; Giannelis, E. P.;
Soroush, A.; Ma, W.; Cyr, M.; Rahaman, M. S.; Asadishad, B.; Tufenkji, N., In Situ
Hu, M.; Zheng, S.; Mi, B., Organic Fouling of Graphene Oxide Membranes and Its
Liu, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Qiu, G.; Li, J.; Xie, J.; Lee, J. Y., Surface Reaction Route To Increase
Li, J.; Yin, L.; Qiu, G.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Xie, J., A photo-bactericidal thin film composite
31 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 32 of 35
596
38.
Liu, L.; Liu, J.; Gao, B.; Yang, F.; Chellam, S., Fouling reductions in a membrane
597
bioreactor using an intermittent electric field and cathodic membrane modified by vapor phase
598
polymerized pyrrole. J. Membr. Sci.2012, 394-395, 202-208.
599
39.
600
wastewater. Water Res.2003, 37, (4), 785-792.
601
40.
602
on electrically conducting carbon nanotube–polyvinyl alcohol composite ultrafiltration
603
membranes. J. Membr. Sci.2014, 468, 1-10.
604
41.
605
Inhibition through Low-Voltage Electrochemical Reactions on Electrically Conducting
606
Membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, (21), 12741-50.
607
42.
608
dual-layer CNT/PVDF membrane for electrically-enhanced fouling resistance. J. Membr.
609
Sci.2015, 491, 37-44.
610
43.
611
Electrochemical multiwalled carbon nanotube filter for viral and bacterial removal and
612
inactivation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, (8), 3672-9.
613
44.
614
wastewater and prevention of biofouling by UV/electrolysis hybrid technology: influence factors
615
and limits for domestic wastewater reuse. Water Res. 2014, 52, 20-8.
616
45.
617
fouling reduction. J. Membr. Sci.2014, 459, 143-156.
Yang, G. C. C.; Yang, T. Y.; Tsai, S. H., Crossflow electro-microfiltration of oxide-CMP
Dudchenko, A. V.; Rolf, J.; Russell, K.; Duan, W.; Jassby, D., Organic fouling inhibition
Ronen, A.; Duan, W.; Wheeldon, I.; Walker, S.; Jassby, D., Microbial Attachment
Wang, S.; Liang, S.; Liang, P.; Zhang, X.; Sun, J.; Wu, S.; Huang, X., In-situ combined
Vecitis, C. D.; Schnoor, M. H.; Rahaman, M. S.; Schiffman, J. D.; Elimelech, M.,
Haaken, D.; Dittmar, T.; Schmalz, V.; Worch, E., Disinfection of biologically treated
Zhang, Q.; Vecitis, C. D., Conductive CNT-PVDF membrane for capacitive organic
32 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 33 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
618
46.
Liu, C.; Xie, X.; Zhao, W.; Liu, N.; Maraccini, P. A.; Sassoubre, L. M.; Boehm, A. B.;
619
Cui, Y., Conducting nanosponge electroporation for affordable and high-efficiency disinfection
620
of bacteria and viruses in water. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, (9), 4288-93.
621
47.
622
single-pass sequential reduction–oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, (17), 6185.
623
48.
624
biofouling prevention by electrically charged nanocomposite polymer thin film membranes.
625
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, (6), 2760-8.
626
49.
627
conductive polymer–multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposite membrane. J. Membr.
628
Sci.2012, 415-416, 718-724.
629
50.
630
A.; Matsumoto, M.; Jassby, D., Treating Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor Effluent with
631
Electrically Conducting Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration Membranes for Fouling Control. J.
632
Membr. Sci. 2016,504,104-112.
633
51.
634
Development of a membrane–carbon cloth assembly for submerged membrane bioreactors to
635
apply an intermittent electric field for fouling suppression. Sep. Purif .Technol. 2012, 88, 202-
636
207.
637
52.
638
hollow fiber membranes with macrovoid-free and highly porous structure for sustainable water
639
production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, (13), 7358-65.
Gao, G.; Zhang, Q.; Vecitis, C. D., CNT–PVDF composite flow-through electrode for
de Lannoy, C. F.; Jassby, D.; Gloe, K.; Gordon, A. D.; Wiesner, M. R., Aquatic
de Lannoy, C. F.; Jassby, D.; Davis, D. D.; Wiesner, M. R., A highly electrically
Duan, W.; Ronen, A.; de Leon, J. V.; Dudchenko, A.; Yao, S.; Corbala-Delgado, J.; Yan,
Akamatsu, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Suzaki, T.; Sakai, Y.; Nagamoto, H.; Nakao, S.-i.,
Sukitpaneenit, P.; Chung, T. S., High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis
33 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 34 of 35
640
53.
McCutcheon, J. R.; Elimelech, M., Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity
641
on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci.2008, 318, (1-2), 458-
642
466.
643
54.
644
membranes based on carboxylated polysulfone microporous support membranes for forward
645
osmosis. J. Membr. Sci.2013, 445, 220-227.
646
55.
647
and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane with hydrophilic
648
nanocomposite support to reduce internal concentration polarization. J. Membr. Sci.2014, 449,
649
74-85.
650
56.
651
electric currents on bacterial detachment and inactivation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100, (2),
652
379-386.
653
57.
654
osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci.2008, 320, (1-2), 292-302.
655
58.
656
membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes. Water Res. 2012, 46, (7), 2478-86.
Cho, Y. H.; Han, J.; Han, S.; Guiver, M. D.; Park, H. B., Polyamide thin-film composite
Emadzadeh, D.; Lau, W. J.; Matsuura, T.; Ismail, A. F.; Rahbari-Sisakht, M., Synthesis
Hong, S. H.; Jeong, J.; Shim, S.; Kang, H.; Kwon, S.; Ahn, K. H.; Yoon, J., Effect of
Mi, B.; Elimelech, M., Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward
She, Q.; Jin, X.; Li, Q.; Tang, C. Y., Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to
34 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 35 of 35
Environmental Science & Technology
TOC art 84x47mm (300 x 300 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment