Subscriber access provided by NEW YORK UNIV
Article
Biofouling and Microbial Communities in Membrane Distillation and Reverse Osmosis Katherine R. Zodrow, Edo Bar-Zeev, Michael J Giannetto, and Menachem Elimelech Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/es503051t • Publication Date (Web): 08 Oct 2014 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 19, 2014
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
Biofouling and Microbial Communities in Membrane Distillation and Reverse Osmosis
Environmental Science & Technology
Revised: October 6, 2014
Katherine R. Zodrow, Edo Bar-Zeev, Michael J. Giannetto, and Menachem Elimelech *
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8286
* Corresponding author: Menachem Elimelech, Email:
[email protected], Phone: (203) 432-2789
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
39
Abstract
40
Membrane distillation (MD) is an emerging desalination technology that uses low-grade heat
41
to drive water vapor across a microporous hydrophobic membrane. Currently, little is known
42
about the biofilms that grow on MD membranes. In this study, we use estuarine water
43
collected from Long Island Sound in a bench-scale direct contact MD system to investigate
44
the initial stages of biofilm formation. For comparison, we studied biofilm formation in a
45
bench-scale reverse osmosis (RO) system using the same feed water. These two membrane
46
desalination systems expose the natural microbial community to vastly different
47
environmental conditions high temperatures with no hydraulic pressure in MD and low
48
temperature with hydraulic pressure in RO. Over the course of 4 days, we observed a steady
49
decline in bacteria concentration (nearly 2 orders of magnitude) in the MD feed reservoir.
50
Even with this drop in planktonic bacteria, significant biofilm formation was observed.
51
Biofilm morphologies on MD and RO membranes were markedly different. MD membrane
52
biofilms were heterogeneous and contained several colonies, while RO membrane biofilms,
53
although thicker, were a homogenous mat. Phylogenetic analysis using next-generation
54
sequencing of 16S ribosomal DNA showed significant shifts in the microbial communities.
55
Bacteria representing the orders Burkholderiales, Rhodobacterales, and Flavobacteriales were
56
most abundant in the MD biofilms. Based on the results, we propose two different regimes
57
for microbial community shifts and biofilm development in RO and MD systems.
58 59
TOC ART
60 61 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 28
Page 3 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
62 63
INTRODUCTION
64
Water and energy are two of the grand challenges of the 21st century. Many technologies
65
have been developed to meet these challenges, including several novel membrane-based
66
processes.1,2 One such process is membrane distillation (MD), which uses a partial vapor
67
pressure difference across a water-excluding, hydrophobic microporous membrane to
68
perform a separation.3–5 Membrane distillation is currently used for separations in the oil and
69
gas industry,6 nutrient recovery,7 chemical separations,8 and water treatment and
70
desalination.5 MD can desalinate sea water or brine at a relatively low temperature (e.g. 50 –
71
80 ˚C) using solar energy or low-grade heat.9
72
Several pilot scale MD plants are currently under development.5 However, like all
73
developing technologies, MD faces several challenges, many of them similar to challenges
74
faced by other membrane technologies. These include fouling by inorganic,10,11 organic,12 and
75
biological matters.8,13,14 Several studies have investigated the effects of inorganic and organic
76
fouling on MD performance;10–12 however, much less is known about the biofilms that form
77
in MD systems.
78
Biofouling in MD may lead to increased temperature polarization (thermal
79
resistance), increased resistance to vapor flow, pore blockage, wetting, or a decrease in the
80
vapor pressure driving force.10,13,14 Biofilms do form in direct contact MD with a coastal sea
81
water feed,14 although little is known about the organisms that constitute those biofilms.
82
However, it is known that the survival of certain species is limited by the relatively high
83
temperatures employed in this process.14 Biofilms in MD with a wastewater feed were probed
84
with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and found to contain several
85
thermophilic
86
Caldalkalibacillus uzonesis.13 This is in contrast to the organisms commonly found on RO
87
membranes, including producers of glycosphingolipids, which, along with Rhodobacteraceae,
88
are suspected to be some of the primary colonizers of RO membranes.15,16
organisms,
including
Meithermus
hypogaeus,
Tepidimonas
sp,
and
89
There are some major differences between these membrane-based desalination
90
methods. RO separates water from salt using a dense selective layer. The driving force for
91
this separation is hydraulic pressure, and this process is carried out at ambient temperature.
92
MD uses a different driving force — a vapor pressure difference across a microporous
93
hydrophobic membrane. This hydrophobic membrane excludes water but allows water vapor 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 4 of 28
94
transport across the membrane. Separation in MD occurs at the interface between the liquid
95
and the vapor phase present inside the membrane. Thus, MD is intentionally carried out at
96
higher temperatures than RO.
97
In this study, we explore biofouling in an MD system and compare it to biofouling in
98
RO. Operating MD and RO simultaneously with natural sea water feeds allows us to compare
99
fouling propensity and biofilm structure in these two systems. We additionally provide the
100
first analysis of the bacterial community on an MD membrane using next-generation
101
sequencing. Our results expand the understanding of biofouling in MD and may assist further
102
development of anti-biofouling materials and treatments.
103 104
MATERIALS AND METHODS
105
Water Collection and Pre-Treatment. Surface water (40 L) was collected in late autumn
106
(December 2013) and winter (January 2014) from a pier in Long Island Sound at the New
107
Haven Harbor near the mouths of the Quinnipiac River and Morris Creek (41˚ 14’ 47.5656”
108
N, 72˚ 54’ 03.1788” W, Figure S1). Plastic carboys were rinsed 3 times with sea water prior
109
to collection, and the water was stored in the dark until use (< 24 h). Pretreatment was carried
110
out using a 10 µm filter (Millipore Isopore, TCTP) and a dead-end cell connected to a
111
peristaltic pump (Masterflex L/S Easy-Load II). Filters were replaced, as necessary, to
112
mitigate cake buildup. Pretreated water was characterized and then used as the feed water in
113
MD and RO bench-scale systems.
114
Sea Water Nutrient Analysis. Water samples were collected in clean 400-mL
115
plastic bottles and frozen (-20 ˚C) prior to analysis. Nutrients (ammonium, nitrate+nitrite,
116
particulate and dissolved nitrogen and phosphorous) were quantified using standard operating
117
procedures at the Nutrient Analytical Services Laboratory (University of Maryland Center for
118
Environmental Science, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory).
119
samples were separated using an acid-washed GF/F filter (Millipore, 0.7 µm) filter.
Particulate and dissolved
120
Bench-Scale Membrane Distillation and Reverse Osmosis. Bench-scale MD
121
and RO experiments were carried out for 4 days with identical initial feed water and similar
122
hydrodynamic operating conditions. Crossflow velocity was 4.3 cm s-1, with initial permeate
123
(distillate) flux of 20 ± 2 L m-2 h-1. Inner membrane cell dimensions in both systems were 7.7
124
cm × 2.6 cm × 0.3 cm (length × width × height). Both MD and RO systems were thoroughly
125
cleaned and disinfected before each experiment by washing with 10% sodium hypochlorite, 5 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
126
mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 90% ethanol, and three deionized (DI) water
127
rinses. 4 L (MD) and 10 L (RO) of each of the above solutions were circulated through the
128
system for 1 hour. During the experiments, both the MD and RO feed tanks were kept in the
129
dark.
130
The direct contact MD system consisted of two closed loops — a feed and a distillate
131
(Figure S2). Details of this system can be found in our previous publication.17 The cold
132
distillate stream was maintained at 18.1 ± 0.37 ˚C, while the hot feed stream was set to 50.4 ±
133
0.56 °C using two chillers (Cole-Parmer Polystat). In order to achieve this temperature, the
134
feed reservoir was maintained at 60 °C. Thermocouples (DS18B20), connected to a
135
microcontroller, were placed at the entrances and exits of the membrane module. A
136
temperature drop across the membrane feed channel of 3.8 °C was observed. A supported
137
PTFE membrane (Millipore, FGLP, 0.2 µm) was used as the distillation membrane. As water
138
vapor condensed on the distillate side and the volume of the distillate increased, water flowed
139
out of the side arm of the flask and passed through a drop counter.17 Any collected distillate
140
water was then pumped through a peristaltic pump (Masterflex L/S Easy-Load II) back into
141
the feed reservoir to prevent concentration of the feed. No increase in distillate conductivity
142
was observed during any of the experiments.
143
Reverse osmosis experiments were carried out in a custom-built, closed-loop
144
system.18 Thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide RO membrane (SW30XLE, Dow Filmtec)
145
coupons were used for all experiments (active area of 7.7 cm × 2.6 cm). Dry membrane
146
coupons were wetted using 25% isopropanol (J.T Baker, PA, USA) for 30 minutes and
147
washed 3 times (1 hour for each wash cycle) using DI water before mounting in the RO test
148
cell. The membrane water permeability coefficient, A, was 3.3 L m-2 h-1 bar-1, and the salt
149
(NaCl) permeability coefficient, B, was 0.184 L m-2 h-1
150
98.6 ± 0.2 % during the experiments. Hydraulic pressure was held constant at 36 bar (520
151
psi) by a high-pressure pump (Hydra-Cell, Wanner Engineering Inc.), yielding an initial
152
water flux of 20 ± 0.3 L m-2 h. During the experiments, temperature was held constant at 25 ±
153
0.2 °C using a high capacity chiller unit (Polyscience, USA). The feed tank was further
154
isolated in a modified refrigerator for better temperature control. A digital flow meter
155
(Humonics 1000, CA, USA) was interfaced with a PC to acquire real-time permeate water
156
flux.
18
. RO membrane salt rejection was
157
Feed water and permeate samples (50 mL) were routinely collected for determining
158
salt rejection (based on electric conductivity). Planktonic samples (1.8 ml) were taken 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
159
periodically from both the MD and RO feed reservoirs and frozen at -80 ˚C with 1 %
160
glutaraldehyde prior to measurement of photosynthetic picoplankton and total bacteria.
161
Bacteria Abundance in Feed Reservoirs. Photosynthetic picoplankton
162
abundance was determined using an Attune® Acoustic Focusing Flow Cytometer (Applied
163
Biosystems) with a syringe based fluidic system and 488 and 405 nm lasers. Samples were
164
fast-thawed at 37 ˚C, and a 1 µm bead (Polysciences) was used as a standard19. For
165
heterotrophic bacteria, 300 µL aliquots of the water samples were incubated at room
166
temperature with the nucleic acid stain SYTO® 9 for 10 min in the dark. A flow rate of 25
167
µL min-1 was used to determine green fluorescence (520 nm) of 75 µL of sample. Taxonomic
168
discrimination was made based on orange fluorescence of phycoerythrin (585 nm), red
169
fluorescence of Chlorophyll a (630 nm)20, side-scatter (a proxy of cell volume21), and
170
forward-scatter (a proxy of cell size22).
171
Membrane Biofilm Characterization. Biofilm formation on the MD and RO
172
membrane surfaces was quantified using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM, Zeiss
173
LSM 510, Carl Zeiss, Inc.). Biofouled membrane coupons were removed from the MD and
174
RO systems and rinsed gently in sterile synthetic sea water (Instant Ocean). The biofilms
175
were stained with a solution of SYTO® 9 and propidium iodide (PI) according to manual
176
(LIVE/DEAD® BacLight™, Invitrogen) to identify live and dead cells. Concurrently,
177
biofilm extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) were stained with 50 mM concanavalin A
178
(Con A, Alexa Flour® 633, Invitrogen). All samples were stained for 40 min in the dark.
179
Biofilms were rinsed again before viewing with the confocal microscope in a custom-made
180
biofilm viewing cell.
181
Confocal images were captured using a CLSM equipped with a Plan-Apochromat
182
20×/0.8 numerical aperture objective. A minimum of seven Z stack random fields (635 µm ×
183
635 µm) were collected for each sample, with a slice thickness of 2.3 µm, using ZEN® (Carl
184
Zeiss, Inc.). SYTO® 9 was excited with an argon laser at 488 nm, PI was excited using a
185
diode-pumped solid state (DPSS) 561 nm laser, and Con A was excited with a helium-neon
186
633 nm laser. FITC, Cy3, and Cy5 filter sets were used. Biovolume was calculated using the
187
COMSTAT223 plug-in for ImageJ 1.41 software24. Automatic thresholding for each image
188
stack was performed using Otsu’s method.
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 28
Page 7 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
189
Contact angle measurements of control and biofouled membranes with DI water were
190
carried out using a Goniometer (VCA Video Contact Angle System, AST Products, Billerica,
191
MA). Ten drops of 2 µL on at least two different membrane samples were measured.
192
DNA Extraction and Sequencing. Both RO and MD were carried out in a closed-
193
loop system, allowing for sampling of the feed before entering the system (‘initial feed’) and
194
at the end of the experiment (‘final feed’). Feed water samples (as much as 1 L) were filtered
195
through a 0.22 µm Durapore membrane (Millipore GVWP) and, together with the membrane
196
subsamples, frozen at -80 ˚C until DNA extraction. After thawing, biomasses from the filters
197
and membrane samples were resuspended with 1 mL lysis buffer (40 mM EDTA, 50 mM tris
198
pH = 8.3, and 0.75 M sucrose) in 2 mL screw-cap tubes. Nucleic acids were then extracted
199
using a phenol–chloroform extraction method modified according to Massana et al.25 Paired-
200
end sequencing of the extracted DNA was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform26 by
201
Research and Testing Laboratory (Lubbock, Texas). Bacterial 16S rRNA variable regions
202
V1-V3 were targeted using the 28f and 519r primer pair.27
203
Microbial Community Analysis. The forward and reverse reads were merged and
204
denoised using the Illumina Paired-End Read Merger (PEAR28). All further analysis was
205
performed with the pipeline Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME), version
206
1.729. Sequences with fewer than 200 bases, quality scores lower than 25, more than 6
207
homopolymers, or any ambiguous bases were removed. Remaining sequences were clustered
208
into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on 97% similarity with the UCLUST
209
algorithm,30 and the cluster seeds were chosen to represent each OTU for downstream
210
analysis. These representative sequences were aligned to the 97% clustered Greengenes
211
database (August 2013).31,32 Chimeras were removed with ChimeraSlayer.33
212
Taxonomy was assigned to OTUs by matching the representative sequences to the
213
complete August 2013 Greengenes database with the RDP Classifier at a 0.9 confidence
214
level.34,35 To analyze α-diversity, all samples were first trimmed to an even size of 22,000
215
sequences with a single rarefaction. Then, the trimmed dataset was rarefied 100 times from 0
216
to 22,000 seqs/sample, at increments of 1,000. For β-diversity analysis, unweighted and
217
weighted UniFrac distances between all samples were calculated from the trimmed
218
dataset,36,37 and principle coordinates analysis (PCoA) was performed on the resulting
219
distance matrices.
220
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
221
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
222
Natural Sea Water Feed Characteristics. Estuarine water from Long Island Sound was
223
collected near the mouths of the Quinnipiac River and Morris Creek during the autumn and
224
winter (Figure S1). Before passing through the MD and RO systems, the collected sea water
225
was pretreated by microfiltration (10 µm) to remove suspended particles and larger
226
planktonic organisms. Key nutrients and biological characteristics of the pre-filtered feed are
227
summarized in Table 1. Overall, the water collected during the autumn contained lower
228
concentrations of nutrients than the water collected in the winter. Correspondingly, dissolved
229
carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus followed the traditional Redfield ratio38 (102:20:1, Table
230
1). A different ratio was observed during the winter (32:6:1), in addition to increased
231
concentrations of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorous. Autumn pretreated feed water
232
contained 8.9 × 105 bacteria cells mL-1 (photosynthetic picoplankton and heterotrophic
233
picoplankton, Table 1). Winter pre-filtered feed water contained between 6.1 × 105 and 1.7 ×
234
106 cells mL-1. Although the composition of these samples is quite different, these differences
235
are not necessarily due to season. It is possible that the differences between each of these
236
samples are caused by variations in the tides and river flows into the region at the time of
237
collection.
238
TABLE 1
239
Next-generation sequencing (MiSeq Illumina26) was used to evaluate the microbial
240
community structure of the initial feed water. Detailed results of the sequencing are provided
241
in the SI. Despite the differences in chemical composition of the two feed water samples
242
collected (Table 1), the microbial community present in this water remained similar in
243
species richness, evenness, and most prevalent operational taxonomic units, or OTUs (Figure
244
1A, Tables S1, S2). The most prevalent OTUs in the initial feeds represented the family
245
Pelagibacteraceae and the genera Octadecabacter, Sediminicola, and Loktanella. All of these
246
bacteria genera are known members of sea water microbial communities. Pelagibacteraceae,
247
of the class Alphaproteobacteria, is commonly found in the world’s oceans, and it includes
248
Pelagibacter ubique, one of the more abundant members of the marine bacteria
249
community.39,40 The genus Octadecabacter contains known psychrophiles (organisms that
250
grow and reproduce at cold temperatures), including Octadecabacter arcticus and
251
Octadecabacter antarcticus.41 Given the cold temperature of the sea water feed (3-7 ˚C,
252
Table 1), the presence of these bacteria is not surprising. The genus Sediminicola contains
253
organisms discovered in marine sediment,42 and species from the genus Loktanella has been 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 28
Page 9 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
254
observed in sea water and beach sand.43,44 Because water samples were collected close to the
255
shore, the presence of bacteria commonly found in beach sand is not surprising (Figure S1).
256
In practice, the feed water microbial community may be slightly different, as seawater
257
desalination plant intakes would be located farther from shore.
258
FIGURE 1
259
Microbial Community Dynamics in MD and RO Feed Reservoirs. MD and
260
RO are two very different desalination processes, especially with respect to operating
261
temperature and pressure, and the response of the natural microbial community structure
262
upon entrance into each of these systems is markedly different. Total bacteria concentration
263
in the initial feed in each of the reservoirs (MD and RO) ranged from 8.9 × 105 to 1.7 × 106
264
cell mL-1 (Table 1) and was dominated by heterotrophic bacteria species (Figure S3). Over
265
the course of the MD experiments, total bacteria decreased by ~2 orders of magnitude (Figure
266
2A). Given the bacterial concentration during the experiment, we conclude that the microbial
267
community shifts observed in the MD feed were a result of temperature-related bacterial
268
inactivation. We suggest that the drastic feed reservoir temperature change (from 3-7 ˚C to 60
269
˚C) resulted in severe heat stress and subsequent population decline. In contrast, the bacteria
270
concentration in the RO feed reservoir remained relatively stable throughout the entire
271
experiment, with slight fluctuations that may be due to ecological succession in the altered
272
environment (Figure 2B).
273
FIGURE 2
274
The assigned taxonomy and the principle coordinates of the unweighted and weighted
275
UniFrac distance show changes in the microbial community after 4 days in the RO and MD
276
systems (Figure 1B,C). In each system, members of the most prevalent OTUs in the initial
277
sea water feed decreased over time and were not abundant in the final feeds of RO or MD
278
(Table S2). The most abundant members of the final RO feed water community included
279
OTUs that represented the family Rhodobacteraceae and the genera Erythrobacter, Ralstonia,
280
and Sediminicola (Table S3). Rhodobacteraceae, members of the class Alphaproteobacteria,
281
were observed in RO membrane biofilms previously,45–47 and members of the genus
282
Erythrobacter (class Alphaproteobacteria and order Sphingomonadales) were some of the
283
first marine bacteria discovered to contain cell membranes with glycosphingolipids.48 It has
284
been postulated that bacteria that produce glycosphingolipids are some of the first colonizers
285
of RO membranes.16,49–51 The genus Ralstonia, of the Betaproteobacteria class and the order
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
286
Burkholderiales, has also been reported to colonize RO membranes.52,53 Some species of the
287
genus Ralstonia are known to degrade a wide variety of contaminants that could potentially
288
be present in the feed samples, which was taken near an industrial area.54,55 Although
289
members of the genus Sediminicola have not yet been reported in RO systems, members of
290
its family Flavobacteria have.47,56–58 The presence of Sediminicola, a genus commonly found
291
in sediment, in our system may also be due to our collection of water near the shore.42 We
292
postulate that the genetic similarities observed between the feed water and RO membrane
293
result from physical deposition, as previously observed.46 Moreover, it may be that the
294
aqueous environment of the RO system assists in selecting the organisms responsible for RO
295
biofouling.
296
The biggest difference between the RO and MD feed waters are temperature, with the
297
RO feed reservoir at 25 ˚C and the MD feed reservoir at 60 ˚C. This temperature difference
298
led to significant changes in the bacteria community (Figure 1B,C). ANOSIM analysis
299
(excluding initial feed communities) of the unweighted UniFrac distances indicates
300
significant (p = 0.017) differences between the grouped RO (biofilms and final feeds) and
301
grouped MD samples (biofilms and the final feeds). Unlike the unweighted UniFrac
302
distances, the weighted UniFrac distances take into account the relative abundance of each
303
OTU, and the differences between the RO and MD group weighted UniFrac distances were
304
not as pronounced (p = 0.087). Therefore, the rare taxa may be driving these differences.
305
Major contributors to the final MD feed included members genera of the genera
306
Ralstonia and Erythrobacter and the order Bacillales. The OTUs identified by Ralstonia and
307
Erythrobacter are shared between the final MD and RO feeds. This similarity is curious but
308
not unreasonable, as members of Ralstonia have been shown to be thermotolerant,55 as have
309
close relatives to Erythrobacter.59 Members of the order Bacillales can form spores that allow
310
them to survive in extreme environments. Thus, they have been found in hot springs60 and
311
marine vents.61 Members of this family were also previously observed on MD membranes.62
312
The differences in the taxa present in both RO and MD systems can also be seen in
313
Figure 3, which shows the 15 most abundant orders (averaged over all MD samples and all
314
RO samples). The orders Burkholderiales, Flavobacteriales, and Rhodobacterales are
315
prevalent in MD and RO biofilms. In the MD system, Burkholderiales, including the genus
316
Ralstonia, appears to be more prevalent. The order Flavobacteriales, which makes up a
317
significantly larger portion of the RO community than the MD community (p = 0.08,
318
Student’s t-test), includes Sediminicola and Olleya. The order Rhodobacterales includes 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 28
Page 11 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
319
Octadecabacter and Loktanella. Additional differences between the microbial communities
320
in the RO and MD systems include an increase in Rhizobiales (primarily Methylobacterium)
321
and a decrease in Thiotrichales (primarily Methylophaga) in the MD system compared to RO.
322
Both of these bacteria are methylotrophs which degrade single carbon species. These changes
323
contribute to the differences observed in the UniFrac distances between each group (Figure
324
1B,C). Thus, we see a clear divergence in the microbial communities after entering the RO
325
and MD systems.
326
FIGURE 3
327
In the case of both MD and RO, a strong selection away from the bacteria naturally
328
abundant in the seawater was observed in the feed reservoirs by the end of the experiment. In
329
MD, it is likely that this selection is a result of bacterial decline at high temperatures (Figure
330
2A). In RO, however, stable bacteria concentrations indicate succession (Figure 2B).
331
Nevertheless, species richness of MD samples (both the final feed and the biofilm) exceeded
332
the richness of the RO samples (Figure 1A) and more closely resembled the richness of the
333
initial feed sea water. It has been shown that species richness in an environment undergoing
334
succession does not decrease until certain species are able to grow and dominate the system.63
335
Thus, although bacteria are actively multiplying in the RO system, the microbial community
336
in the MD system was unable to reach this point of ecological succession.
337
Biofilms on MD and RO Membranes. Biofilms that developed on MD and RO
338
membranes during both seasons were observed to have different architecture (Figure 4) and
339
community structure (Tables 2 and S5). In general, the RO membrane was covered with
340
homogeneous microbial mat (Figure 4B,D) while the MD membrane biofilm consisted of
341
several heterogeneous colonies (Figure 4A,C). Moreover, the total biofilm biovolume in MD
342
was significantly lower than the total biovolume measured on RO membranes for both the
343
autumn and winter runs (Figure S4).
344
FIGURE 4
345
In the autumn, biofilms formed in MD and RO contained mostly live cells with a
346
relatively small amount of EPS (Figure S5). During the winter run, the overall trends in
347
biofilm morphology resembled the autumn run the MD biofilm appeared heterogeneous
348
with several colonies (Figure 4C), and the RO biofilm was a relatively homogenous mat
349
(Figure 4D). However, the biofilms formed on both MD and RO membranes in the winter
350
contained a greater amount of dead cells (increased 3.1× in MD and 4.1× in RO) and EPS 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
351
(increased 3.0× in MD and 4.4× in RO) (Figure S5). It is likely that these differences in
352
biofilm composition were a result of different chemical or biological components in the
353
initial sea water feeds. It is also likely that the different composition of the biofilm in the
354
winter, especially the greater volume of EPS,64 played a role in the increased flux decline
355
observed in RO (discussed in the next section).
356
We postulate that the large differences in hydraulic conditions (i.e. pressure) have
357
dictated the overall biofilm architecture. We observe here that the overall structure of the
358
biofilms formed in MD is very different from the biofilms formed in RO. Being a membrane
359
process that is not driven by hydraulic pressure, MD is more similar to forward osmosis (FO)
360
than RO. The heterogeneous structure of the biofilm containing larger colonies is analogous
361
to biofilms previously observed in FO.65 However, although the microscopic structure of the
362
biofilms formed in MD is similar to those formed in FO, it is likely that the microbial
363
community members of this biofilm are quite different than the members in biofilms formed
364
in other membrane processes due to the high temperatures employed in MD (Figure 1, Table
365
2). Additionally, although we observed a ~2 orders of magnitude decline in bacteria in the
366
feed reservoir (Figure 2A), CLSM live/dead staining indicates that the bacteria in the
367
membrane biofilms are alive and produce EPS (Figures 4A,C and S5). Thus, bacteria are able
368
to live on the MD membrane surface despite a steep, temperature-related decline in bacteria
369
concentration in the feed water.
370
Many of the OTUs that we observed in the initial feed and the RO biofilms were also
371
present in the MD biofilm (Table 2). However, certain organisms favored the MD membrane
372
surface. These organisms, represented an order of magnitude more in the biofilm than the
373
MD feed, are underlined in Table 2. Many of these organisms, including Octadecabacter,
374
Pelagibacteraceae, and Loktanella, have been discussed above, but they also include
375
Vibrioniceae and Cryomorphaceae. Vibrioniceae is a common marine bacterium, and
376
members of Cryomorphaceae, despite their name, have been shown to grow at warmer
377
temperatures.66
378
TABLE 2
379
Notably, fewer thermophilic organisms were present in the MD biofilm than we had
380
initially hypothesized. It is possible that the lack of thermophilic organisms detected in the
381
MD biofilm is a result of temperature polarization in the MD membrane module, which is
382
greatly influenced by operating conditions. In these experiments, the temperature at the
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 28
Page 13 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
383
channel inlet was held at ~50 °C, and by the MD cell outlet the temperature had decreased by
384
3.8 °C. If we assume that all of this heat loss occurred through the membrane, then the
385
temperature at the membrane surface during operation was calculated to be ~13 °C lower
386
than the bulk (i.e. ~37 °C) (details in the Supporting Information). Thus, provided an
387
organism can survive for a short time at ~60 °C in the feed reservoir, that organism can
388
deposit and grow on the cooler MD membrane surface. This mode of action may be very
389
important for organisms that can form protective spores, e.g. Bacillus sp.
390
Overall, during the course of these experiments, we have observed a shift in the
391
natural microbial community in the sea water feed (Figure 1B,C). Shifts occur in both RO
392
and MD, and species that can survive and thrive in each of these environments dominate the
393
microbial communities in these systems. Our 4 day experiment is a snapshot of the initial
394
biofilms that form in these systems, and the differences between these two communities
395
would likely increase with time.
396
Impact of Biofouling on MD and RO Performance. Given a similar initial
397
water flux (20 ± 2 L m-2 h-1) and cross flow velocity (4.3 cm s-1), very different permeate
398
water flux behaviors were measured throughout the course of each experiment (Figure 5). In
399
autumn, permeate water flux in MD remained stable throughout the 4 day experiment (Figure
400
5A), and a slight decline (< 5%) of permeate water flux was observed in RO (Figure 5B). In
401
contrast, winter runs exhibited a total flux decline of 50% in MD and 7% RO. The sharp
402
decline in water flux (50%) in MD occurred during the first 12 h of the experiment. MD
403
experiments were repeated twice, verifying that the severe water flux decline observed was
404
the result of the fouling propensity of the feed water. These variations between autumn and
405
winter runs most likely resulted from a significant difference in fouling propensities of the
406
natural sea water.
407
FIGURE 5
408
Our results suggest that the fouling in MD resulted in partial pore blockage by
409
biological and/or organic constituents in the feed water that were not removed by the
410
microfiltration (10 µm) pretreatment. In the winter, poorer water quality was observed, with
411
DOC increasing 25%, particulate carbon increasing 135%, and total phosphorous increasing
412
426% (Table 1), potentially leading to rapid (~12 h) flux decline. These differences in water
413
quality likely impacted bacterial growth (Table 2) and EPS production (Figures 4 and S4).
414
Additionally, the severe flux decline in the winter MD (Figure 5A) was mirrored by a greater 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
415
flux decline in RO (Figure 5B). However, RO flux decline in the winter was not as large or as
416
rapid as the MD flux decline, indicating that MD is more sensitive to certain changes in feed
417
water quality than RO. This observation is a result of the different structure and fouling
418
mechanisms of these membranes. RO membranes have a dense, salt-rejecting selective layer.
419
When a biofilm forms on these membranes, it increases the hydraulic resistance to permeate
420
water flow and decreases the net driving force for water permeation through biofilm
421
enhanced osmotic pressure.64,67,68 Thus, the fouling in RO in the winter may be due to the
422
hydraulic resistance of EPS produced over time. In contrast, fouling of a porous MD
423
membrane as observed in Figure 5A is attributed to blocking of pores of the microporous
424
membrane, which increases the resistance to water vapor transport through the membrane.13
425
The significant fouling and flux decline in the winter MD run was not accompanied
426
by wetting of the hydrophobic MD membrane. When water enters the pores of the membrane,
427
the membrane no longer provides a barrier for passage of salt.62 However, in our
428
experiments, no increase in distillate water conductivity was observed. We did, however, see
429
that the formation of a biofilm on the membrane surface greatly decreased the water contact
430
angle from 134 ± 4˚ to 32 ± 6˚ (Figure S5). Thus, a hydrophilic membrane surface is not the
431
only requirement for membrane wetting. This hydrophilic film must additionally coat the
432
interior membrane pores in order to impact membrane performance.
433
Proposed Biofouling Regimes in MD and RO. As natural sea water undergoes
434
changes in the RO system (temperature, pressure, and hydrodynamics), the microbial
435
community shifts, and certain organisms that are able to survive under these conditions begin
436
to grow. The bacteria that thrive in the feed water are very similar to those that form the
437
initial biofilm on the RO membrane (Tables S3 and S5). Thus, the aquatic environment of the
438
RO process may help select the organisms responsible for RO membrane biofilms. It may
439
also be that many bacteria deposit on the RO membrane surface due to flow conditions
440
during operation. The impact of operating conditions, including pressure and permeate flow,
441
on biofilm structure in RO must be understood in order to develop successful biofouling
442
mitigating strategies.
443
The microbial community undergoes a much different transformation in the hotter
444
MD system, and there are larger differences between the microbial community in the final
445
feed and the membrane biofilm due to temperature gradients, temperature polarization, and
446
bacterial attachment. Once the sea water feed is placed in the MD system, the number of
447
bacteria decreases. Despite this decline, organisms, along with other macromolecular and 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 28
Page 15 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
448
colloidal matter, can block membrane pores and decrease distillate water flux (Figure 5A). In
449
fact, the MD membrane surface may be one of the most favorable locations in our system for
450
microbial growth, as it is the coolest location on the feed side of our system. Depending on
451
the temperatures employed and temperature polarization in a given system, bacteria that are
452
able to survive for a short time at high temperatures may attach and grow on the cooler
453
membrane surface. Thus, even with a filtration pretreatment and relatively high operating
454
temperatures, biofouling may pose a problem for MD implementation.
455 456
Supporting Information
457
Location of sea water feed sample collection (Figure S1); closed-loop MD system (Figure
458
S2); cell counts in MD and RO feed reservoirs (Figure S3); biovolume in MD and RO
459
biofilms (Figure S5); contact angle measurements on pristine and biofouled MD membranes
460
(Figure S5); sequencing and quality trimming results, temperature polarization in MD,
461
observed OTUs and Shannon diversity in initial feed (Table S1); 10 most abundant OTUs in
462
initial feeds (Table S2); 10 most abundant OTUs in final RO feeds (Table S3); 10 most
463
abundant OTUs in final MD feed (Table S4); 10 most abundant OTUs in RO biofilm (Table
464
S5); 30 most abundant OTUs in MD biofilms (Table S6). This information is available free of
465
charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.
466 467
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
468
This research was made possible by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research
469
Fellowship to Katherine R. Zodrow (Grant No. DGE-1122492). We also acknowledge
470
support provided to Dr. Edo Bar-Zeev by the United States-Israel Binational Agricultural
471
Research and Development (BARD) postdoctoral fellowship fund. We thank Eyal Rahav for
472
assistance with flow cytometry, and Dr. Shihong Lin for assistance with the temperature
473
polarization model. Lastly, we thank Dr. Joseph Wolenski from the Molecular, Cellular, and
474
Developmental Biology Department at Yale University for technical assistance using the
475
CLSM.
476 477
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
478
REFERENCES
479 480
(1)
Elimelech, M.; Phillip, W. A. The future of seawater desalination: Energy, technology, and the environment. Science 2011, 333, 712–717.
481 482
(2)
Logan, B. E.; Elimelech, M. Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature 2012, 488, 313–319.
483 484
(3)
Khayet, M. Membranes and theoretical modeling of membrane distillation: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 164, 56–88.
485 486 487
(4)
Saffarini, R. B.; Summers, E. K.; Arafat, H. A.; Lienhard V, J. H. Economic evaluation of stand-alone solar powered membrane distillation systems. Desalination 2012, 299, 55–62.
488 489 490
(5)
Saffarini, R. B.; Summers, E. K.; Arafat, H. A.; Lienhard V, J. H. Technical evaluation of stand-alone solar powered membrane distillation systems. Desalination 2012, 286, 332–341.
491 492 493 494
(6)
Shaffer, D. L.; Arias Chavez, L. H.; Ben-Sasson, M.; Romero-Vargas Castrillón, S.; Yip, N. Y.; Elimelech, M. Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: Drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 9569–9583.
495 496 497
(7)
Xie, M.; Nghiem, L. D.; Price, W. E.; Elimelech, M. A forward osmosis-membrane distillation hybrid process for direct sewer mining : System performance and limitations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 13486–13493.
498 499
(8)
Gryta, M. The assessment of microorganism growth in the membrane distillation system. Desalination 2002, 142, 79–88.
500 501 502 503
(9)
Guillen-Burrieza, E.; Thomas, R.; Mansoor, B.; Johnson, D.; Hilal, N.; Arafat, H. Effect of dry-out on the fouling of PVDF and PTFE membranes under conditions simulating intermittent seawater membrane distillation (SWMD). J. Memb. Sci. 2013, 438, 126–139.
504 505
(10)
Gryta, M. Fouling in direct contact membrane distillation process. J. Memb. Sci. 2008, 325, 383–394.
506 507
(11)
Nghiem, L. D.; Cath, T. A scaling mitigation approach during direct contact membrane distillation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 80, 315–322.
508 509
(12)
Srisurichan, S.; Jiraratananon, R.; Fane, a. G. Humic acid fouling in the membrane distillation process. Desalination 2005, 174, 63–72.
510 511 512
(13)
Goh, S.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; McDougald, D.; Krantz, W. B.; Liu, Y.; Fane, A. G. Impact of a biofouling layer on the vapor pressure driving force and performance of a membrane distillation process. J. Memb. Sci. 2013, 1–13.
513 514
(14)
Krivorot, M.; Kushmaro, a.; Oren, Y.; Gilron, J. Factors affecting biofilm formation and biofouling in membrane distillation of seawater. J. Memb. Sci. 2011, 376, 15–24.
515 516 517
(15)
Elifantz, H.; Horn, G.; Ayon, M.; Cohen, Y.; Minz, D. Rhodobacteraceae are the key members of the microbial community of the initial biofilm formed in Eastern Mediterranean coastal seawater. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 85, 348–357.
518 519
(16)
Bereschenko, L. A.; Heilig, G. H. J.; Nederlof, M. M.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Stams, A. J. M.; Euverink, G. J. W. Molecular characterization of the bacterial
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 28
Page 17 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
520 521
communities in the different compartments of a full-scale reverse-osmosis water purification plant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 5297–5304.
522 523 524 525
(17)
Zodrow, K. R.; Coulter, V. H.; Shaulsky, E.; Elimelech, M. Low flow data logger in membrane distillation : An interdisciplinary laboratory in process control. In Interdisciplinary Engineering Design Education Conference (IEDEC); Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2014; pp. 70–73.
526 527 528
(18)
Bar-Zeev, E.; Elimelech, M. Reverse osmosis biofilm dispersal by osmotic backflushing: Cleaning via substratum perforation. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2014, 1, 162–166.
529 530
(19)
Stambler, N. Light and picophytoplankton in the Gulf of Eilat (Aqaba). J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111, C11009.
531 532
(20)
Vaulot, D.; Marie, D. Diel variability of photosynthetic picoplankton in the equatorial Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. 1999, 104, 3297–3310.
533 534 535
(21)
Simon, N.; Barlow, R. G.; Marie, D.; Partensky, F.; Vaulot, D. Characterization of oceanic photosynthetic picoeukaryotes by flow cytometry. J. Phycol 1994, 30, 935– 942.
536 537 538
(22)
Robertson, B. R.; Button, D. K.; Koch, A. L. Determination of the biomasses of small bacteria at low concentrations in a mixture of species with forward light scatter measurements by flow cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3900–3909.
539 540 541
(23)
Heydorn, A.; Nielsen, A. T.; Hentzer, M.; Sternberg, C.; Givskov, M.; Ersbøll, B. K.; Molin, S. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology 2000, 146, 2395–2407.
542 543
(24)
Abràmoff, M. D.; Hospitals, I.; Magalhães, P. J.; Abràmoff, M. Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics 2004, 11, 36–42.
544 545 546
(25)
Massana, R.; Murray, A. E.; Preston, C. M.; DeLong, E. F. Vertical distribution and phylogenetic characterization of marine planktonic Archaea in the Santa Barbara Channel. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 50–56.
547 548 549 550
(26)
Caporaso, J. G.; Lauber, C. L.; Walters, W. a; Berg-Lyons, D.; Huntley, J.; Fierer, N.; Owens, S. M.; Betley, J.; Fraser, L.; Bauer, M.; et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1621–1624.
551 552
(27)
Campbell, B. J.; Kirchman, D. L. Bacterial diversity, community structure and potential growth rates along an estuarine salinity gradient. ISME J. 2013, 7, 210–220.
553 554
(28)
Zhang, J.; Kobert, K.; Flouri, T.; Stamatakis, A. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 614–620.
555 556 557 558
(29)
Caporaso, J. G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F. D.; Costello, E. K.; Fierer, N.; Peña, A. G.; Goodrich, J. K.; Gordon, J. I.; et al. QIIME allows analysis of high- throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335– 336.
559 560
(30)
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2460–2461.
561 562 563
(31)
Caporaso, J. G.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F. D.; DeSantis, T. Z.; Andersen, G. L.; Knight, R. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 266–267. 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
564 565 566 567
(32)
DeSantis, T. Z.; Hugenholtz, P.; Larsen, N.; Rojas, M.; Brodie, E. L.; Keller, K.; Huber, T.; Dalevi, D.; Hu, P.; Andersen, G. L. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 5069–5072.
568 569 570 571
(33)
Haas, B. J.; Gevers, D.; Earl, A. M.; Feldgarden, M.; Ward, D. V; Giannoukos, G.; Ciulla, D.; Tabbaa, D.; Highlander, S. K.; Sodergren, E.; et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 2011, 21, 494–504.
572 573 574 575
(34)
McDonald, D.; Price, M. N.; Goodrich, J.; Nawrocki, E. P.; DeSantis, T. Z.; Probst, A.; Andersen, G. L.; Knight, R.; Hugenholtz, P. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 2012, 6, 610–618.
576 577 578
(35)
Wang, Q.; Garrity, G. M.; Tiedje, J. M.; Cole, J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5261–5267.
579 580
(36)
Lozupone, C.; Knight, R. UniFrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 8228–8235.
581 582 583
(37)
Lozupone, C. A.; Hamady, M.; Kelley, S. T.; Knight, R. Quantitative and qualitative beta diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1576–1585.
584 585
(38)
Redfield, A. C. The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am. Sci. 1958, 46, 205–221.
586 587 588
(39)
Biers, E. J.; Sun, S.; Howard, E. C. Prokaryotic genomes and diversity in surface ocean waters: interrogating the global ocean sampling metagenome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 2221–2229.
589 590 591
(40)
Morris, R. M.; Rappe, M. S.; Connon, S. A.; Vergin, K. L.; Siebold, W. A.; Carlson, C. A.; Giovannoni, S. J. SAR11 clade dominates ocean surface bacterioplankton communities. Nature 2002, 420, 806–810.
592 593 594
(41)
Gosink, J. J.; Herwig, R. P.; Staley, J. T. Octadecabacter arcticus gen. nov., sp. nov., and O. antarcticus, sp. nov., Nonpigmented, psychrophilic gas vacuolate bacteria from Polar sea ice and water. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 20, 356–365.
595 596 597
(42)
Khan, S. T.; Nakagawa, Y.; Harayama, S. Sediminicola luteus gen. nov., sp. nov., A novel member of the family Flavobacteriaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 841–845.
598 599 600
(43)
Lee, J.; Jung, J.-Y.; Kim, S.; Chang, I. S.; Mitra, S. S.; Kim, I. S. Selection of the most problematic biofoulant in fouled RO membrane and the seawater intake to develop biosensors for membrane biofouling. Desalination 2009, 247, 125–136.
601 602 603
(44)
Moon, Y. G.; Seo, S. H.; Lee, S. D.; Heo, M. S. Loktanella pyoseonensis sp. nov., isolated from beach sand, and emended description of the genus Loktanella. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 785–789.
604 605 606
(45)
Khan, M. M. T.; Stewart, P. S.; Moll, D. J.; Mickols, W. E.; Burr, M. D.; Nelson, S. E.; Camper, A. K. Assessing biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis (RO) membrane surfaces in a laboratory system. J. Memb. Sci. 2010, 349, 429–437.
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 28
Page 19 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
607 608
(46)
Khan, M. T.; de O Manes, C.-L.; Aubry, C.; Gutierrez, L.; Croue, J. P. Kinetic study of seawater reverse osmosis membrane fouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013.
609 610 611
(47)
Zhang, M.; Jiang, S.; Tanuwidjaja, D.; Voutchkov, N.; Hoek, E. M. V; Cai, B. Composition and variability of biofouling organisms in seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 4390–4398.
612 613
(48)
Shiba, T.; Simidu, U. Erythrobacter longus gen. nov., sp. nov., An aerobic bacterium which contains Bacteriochlorophyll a. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1982, 32, 211–217.
614 615
(49)
Lee, J.; Kim, I. S. Microbial community in seawater reverse osmosis and rapid diagnosis of membrane biofouling. Desalination 2011, 273, 118–126.
616 617 618
(50)
Bereschenko, L. A.; Stams, A. J. M.; Euverink, G. J. W.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Biofilm formation on reverse osmosis membranes is initiated and dominated by Sphingomonas spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2623–2632.
619 620 621
(51)
Al Ashhab, A.; Herzberg, M.; Gillor, O. Biofouling of reverse-osmosis membranes during tertiary wastewater desalination: microbial community composition. Water Res. 2014, 50, 342-349.
622 623 624
(52)
Pang, C. M.; Hong, P.; Guo, H.; Liu, W.-T. Biofilm formation characteristics of bacterial isolates retrieved from a reverse osmosis membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 7541–7550.
625 626 627 628
(53)
Ivnitsky, H.; Katz, I.; Minz, D.; Volvovic, G.; Shimoni, E.; Kesselman, E.; Semiat, R.; Dosoretz, C. G. Bacterial community composition and structure of biofilms developing on nanofiltration membranes applied to wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2007, 41, 3924–3935.
629 630 631 632
(54)
Mergeay, M.; Monchy, Sã©.; Vallaeys, T.; Auquier, V.; Benotmane, A.; Bertin, P.; Taghavi, S.; Dunn, J.; Lelie, D.; Wattiez, R. Ralstonia metallidurans, a bacterium specifically adapted to toxic metals: towards a catalogue of metal-responsive genes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 385–410.
633 634 635
(55)
Lee, S.-K.; Lee, S. B. Isolation and characterization of a thermotolerant bacterium Ralstonia sp. strain PHS1 that degrades benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o -xylene. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 56, 270–275.
636 637 638
(56)
Mansouri, J.; Harrisson, S.; Chen, V. Strategies for controlling biofouling in membrane filtration systems: challenges and opportunities. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 4567.
639 640 641 642
(57)
Ridgway, H. F.; Kelly, A.; Justice, C.; Olson, B. H. Microbial fouling of reverseosmosis membranes used in advanced wastewater treatment technology: chemical, bacteriological, and ultrastructural analyses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1983, 45, 1066–1084.
643 644
(58)
Baker, J.; Dudley, L. Biofouling in membrane systems - A review. Desalination 1998, 118, 81–89.
645 646 647 648
(59)
Yurkov, V. V; Krieger, S.; Stackebrandt, E.; Beatty, J. T. Citromicrobium bathyomarinum, a novel aerobic bacterium isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal vent plume waters that contains photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 4517–4525.
649 650
(60)
Baker, G. C.; Gaffar, S.; Cowan, D. a; Suharto, a R. Bacterial community analysis of Indonesian hot springs. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 200, 103–109. 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
651 652 653
(61)
Caccamo, D.; Maugeri, T. L.; Gugliandolo, C. Identification of thermophilic and marine bacilli from shallow thermal vents by restriction analysis of their amplified 16S rDNA. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 91, 520–524.
654 655 656
(62)
Goh, S.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Fane, A. G. Fouling and wetting in membrane distillation (MD) and MD-bioreactor (MDBR) for wastewater reclamation. Desalination 2012, 1– 9.
657 658
(63)
Jackson, C. R. Changes in community properties during microbial succession. OIKOS 2003, 2, 444–448.
659 660 661
(64)
Herzberg, M.; Kang, S.; Elimelech, M. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 4393–4398.
662 663
(65)
Yoon, H.; Baek, Y.; Yu, J.; Yoon, J. Biofouling occurrence process and its control in the forward osmosis. Desalination 2013, 325, 30–36.
664 665 666 667
(66)
Lee, D.-H.; Choi, E.-K.; Moon, S.-R.; Ahn, S.; Lee, Y. S.; Jung, J. S.; Jeon, C. O.; Whang, K.-S.; Kahng, H.-Y. Wandonia haliotis gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine bacterium of the family Cryomorphaceae, phylum Bacteroidetes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 510–514.
668 669 670
(67)
Hoek, E. M. V; Elimelech, M. Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: A new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 5581–5588.
671 672
(68)
Herzberg, M.; Elimelech, M. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes : Role of biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure. J. Memb. Sci. 2007, 295, 11–20.
673 674
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 28
Page 21 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
675
Table1. Sea water characteristics. Chemical composition of sea water was determined using
676
standard methods. Total bacteria was determined using flow cytometry.
Temperature
Units
Autumn
Winter
˚C
7
3
7.71
7.68
mS cm-1
49.1
43.2
g L-1
26.6
23.3
-1
1.85
2.32
-1
0.036
0.034
-1
0.0987
0.1720
-1
0.0182
0.0722
-1
0.0181
0.0776
-1
0.38
0.43
-1
0.34
0.46
-1
0.0211
0.0433
-1
0.1140
0.268
pH Conductivity Salinity Total Dissolved Carbon Ammonium Nitrate + Nitrite Total Dissolved Phosphorous Total Phosphorous Total Dissolved Nitrogen
mg-C L
mg-N L mg-N L mg-P L mg-P L
mg-N L
Total Nitrogen
mg-N L
Particulate Nitrogen
mg-N L
Particulate Carbon
mg-C L
Total Bacteria
cells mL
-1
8.9 × 10
677 678
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
5
6.1 – 17 × 10
5
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 22 of 28
679
Table 2. Ten most abundant OTUs in the MD Biofilms (%). Percent composition is given,
680
along with percent composition in the final MD feed. Underlined OTUs are present at least
681
one order of magnitude more in the biofilm than the feed. Unless otherwise noted, taxonomy
682
is given at the genus level. If genus level taxonomy is not available, family (f) or order (o) is
683
given. (A = autumn, W = winter)
684
Biofilm (A)
Biofilm (W)
Final Feed (A)
Final Feed (W)
Ralstonia
5.7
34.4
44.7
22.3
Octadecabacter
17.1
4.6
0.1
0.3
Pelagibacteraceae (f)
7.5
6.2
0.0
0.0
Loktanella
6.1
4.8
0.9
0.6
Sediminicola
7.5
3.0
0.0
2.4
Vibrionaceae (f)
8.4
1.3
0.5
0.0
Rhodobacteraceae (f)
4.8
3.9
0.4
5.7
Cryomorphaceae (f)
4.7
2.2
0.1
0.0
Flavobacteriaceae (f)
4.2
1.9
0.0
1.5
Bacillales (o)
5.3
0.4
23.4
0.0
Sum
71.1
62.8
70.2
32.7
685 686
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
A Observed OTUs
3000
2000
1000 Initial Feed MD RO
5000 10000 15000 20000
Sequences per Sample B PC2 (14%)
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2 -0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
PC1 (16.9%)
PC2 (21.3%)
0.4
C
Initial Feed Final MD Feed RO Biofilm
MD Biofilm Final RO Feed
0.2
0.0
-0.2 -0.2
687
0.0
0.2
0.4
PC1 (48.6%)
688
Figure 1. Alpha- and Beta- diversity of microbial communities in this study. (A) Rarefaction
689
curves with all MD samples, including final feed and biofilms (‘MD’) and all RO samples
690
(‘RO’). Curves represent means and standard deviations of all samples in a group. (B)
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
691
Unweighted, and (C) weighted principle coordinate plot (B) of UniFrac distance for all
692
samples.
693
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 28
Page 25 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
B) RO
A) MD
Cells mL-1
106
105
104
Autumn Winter
Autumn Winter 103
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
Time (h)
694
20
40
60
80
100
Time (h)
695 696 697
Figure 2. Concentration of cells (photosynthetic picoplankton and total bacteria) in feed
698
reservoirs during (A) MD and (B) RO. 1.8 mL samples were taken from the feed reservoirs
699
throughout each experiment, frozen at -80 ˚C in glutaraldehyde, and measured using flow
700
cytometry.
701
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 26 of 28
MD RO
0.4 0.3 0.2
*
0.1
Acidimicrobiales
Campylobacterales
Alphaproteobacteria (c)
Rickettsiales
Vibrionales
Rhizobiales
Alteromonadales
Bacillales
Pseudomonadales
Sphingomonadales
Rhodobacterales
Flavobacteriales
Burkholderiales
Oceanospirillales
*
0.0
Thiotrichales
Fraction of Total OTUs
0.5
702 703 704 705
Figure 3. Comparison between top 15 OTUs in MD and RO samples (biofilm and final feed).
706
Taxa are grouped according to order. Significant differences between RO and MD samples
707
are marked with an asterisk (p < 0.05). Additional orders of interest are underlined.
708 709 710
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 28
Environmental Science & Technology
711 712
Figure 4. CLSM orthagonal views of biofilms formed in membrane distillation (A, autumn;
713
C, winter) and reverse osmosis (B, autumn; D, winter). All sizes are in µm. The left inset in
714
(A) is in a higher horizontal plane than the main orthogonal image.
715 26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 28 of 28
716 717
A) MD
B) RO
Normalized Flux
1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4
Autumn Winter
Autumn Winter
0.2 0 718
25
50
75
0
Time (h)
25
50
75
Time (h)
719 720 721
Figure 5. Normalized permeate flux during (A) MD and (B) RO experiments. Initial flux was
722
20 ± 2 L m-2 h-1. Crossflow velocity was 4.3 cm s-1. RO and MD feed temperature were
723
maintained at 25 and 50 ˚C, respectively.
724
27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment