Cottonseed Extracts and Gossypol Regulate ... - ACS Publications

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Regional Research. Center, New Orleans, LA 70124, USA. * To whom correspondenc...
2 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEW ENGLAND ARMIDALE

Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions

Cottonseed Extracts and Gossypol Regulate Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase Gene Expression in Mouse Macrophages Heping Cao, and Kandan Sethumadhavan J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01240 • Publication Date (Web): 29 May 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 29, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Cottonseed Extracts and Gossypol Regulate Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase Gene Expression in Mouse Macrophages

Heping Cao*, Kandan Sethumadhavan

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA 70124, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 504-286-4351. Fax: 504-286-4367. E-mail: [email protected].

Running Title: Cottonseed extracts and gossypol regulate DGAT gene expression

Manuscript Correspondence: Heping Cao, PhD USDA-ARS-SRRC 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd New Orleans, LA 70124 Phone: (504) 286-4351 E-mail: [email protected]

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 2 of 34

1

ABSTRACT

2

Plant bioactive polyphenols have been used for the prevention and treatment of various diseases

3

since ancient history. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seeds are classified as glanded or glandless

4

depending on the presence or absence of pigment glands, which contain polyphenolic gossypol.

5

Diacylglycerol acyltransferases (DGATs) are integral membrane proteins that catalyze the last

6

step of triacylglycerol biosynthesis in eukaryotes. Understanding the regulation of DGATs will

7

provide information for therapeutic intervention for obesity and related diseases. However, little

8

was known if DGAT gene expression was regulated by natural products. The objective of this

9

study was to investigate the effects of cottonseed extracts and gossypol on DGAT gene expression

10

in mouse RAW264.7 macrophages. Mouse cells were treated with different concentrations of

11

cottonseed extracts, gossypol, and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) for various times. Quantitative PCR

12

assay showed that coat extract of glanded seeds had a modest effect on DGAT1 and minimal effect

13

on DGAT2 mRNA levels. Kernel extract of glanded seeds had a minimal effect on DGAT1 but

14

increased DGAT2 mRNA levels more than 20-fold. Coat extract of glandless seeds and LPS had

15

minimal effects on DGAT mRNA levels. Kernel extract of glandless seeds did not have much

16

effect on DGAT1 and slightly increased DGAT2 mRNA levels. Gossypol increased DGAT1 and

17

DGAT2 mRNA levels by up to 3-fold and more than 80-fold, respectively. The coefficient

18

correlation (R2) between DGAT2 mRNA levels and glanded kernel extract and gossypol

19

concentrations were 0.82-0.99. This study suggests that Dgat2 is an inducible gene rapidly

20

responding to stimulators such as polyphenols whose protein product DGAT2 plays an important

21

role in fat biosynthesis. We conclude that gossypol and ethanol extract from glanded cottonseed

22

kernel are strong stimulators of DGAT2 gene expression and that they may be novel agents for

23

intervention of lipid-related dysfunction via increasing DGAT2 gene expression in target tissues.

24 2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

25 26

Keywords: Cottonseed extract, diacylglycerol acyltransferase, gene expression, gossypol,

27

lipopolysaccharides, macrophages

28 29 30

INTRODUCTION

31

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plant provides two economically important products: fiber and

32

cottonseed. Cottonseeds account for 20% of the crop value. Cottonseeds are classified as either

33

glanded or glandless seeds depending on the presence or absence of pigment glands, which contain

34

toxic gossypol (Figure 1).1 Glanded cottonseeds are composed of 10% linters, 40% hulls and 50%

35

kernels.2 The kernels contain about 35% oil and 40% protein.3 Commercial cottonseed meal

36

contains approximately 1% gossypol after oil extraction.4 The presence of gossypol limits its use

37

of meals primarily to feed ruminants, which have a relatively high tolerance for the compound.5-7

38

Glandless cottonseeds do not contain pigment glands and have only trace levels of gossypol,

39

making them a good source of protein as a food ingredient or as a feed for non-ruminant

40

animals.8-10 This development has generated considerable interest within the cotton industry.11-13

41

Glanded cottonseeds contain a number of bioactive components, such as gossypol, gallic acid,

42

and 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid.14 Gossypol is a well-studied complex polyphenol found in the

43

small intercellular pigment glands in the leaves, stems, roots, and seed of cotton plants (Figure

44

1).15 Gossypol and related compounds have anticancer activities against breast cancer,16 colon

45

cancer,17 pancreatic cancer,18 and prostate cancer.19 It has additional bioactivities such as

46

antiobesity,20 antiinflammatory,21 and antifungal activities.22 Gossypol has also been proposed as

47

an antifertility agent for males.23 These discoveries have created much excitement in biomedical

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 4 of 34

48

field and enormous amounts of research have been focused on understanding the medicinal

49

properties of gossypol and related compounds. However, chronic consumption of

50

gossypol-containing cottonseed oil can result in human male infertility.5 Therefore, gossypol is

51

regarded as unsafe for most animals and humans. Significant efforts have been directed at reducing

52

gossypol content in cottonseed by selecting glandless cotton varieties

53

engineering of cotton to provide gossypol-free seeds.11,12

9,10,24

and genetic

54

Minor bioactive components have been studied in glandless cottonseed with flavonol

55

glycosides (flavonoids) being the best-studied. Five flavonoids have been identified in glandless

56

cottonseed.25,26 Seven flavonol glycosides have also been identified from whole cottonseed.14 It

57

was reported that aqueous extracts from glandless cottonseed meal had an antidepressant effect

58

due to the flavonol glycoside, quercetin.26 This compound was shown to have antidepressant

59

effects in pharmacological tests27,28 with potential applications in treating anxiety, depression and

60

Alzeheimer’s disease.29 Independent studies have confirmed that flavonoids could be used as a

61

therapy for depression associated with diabetes30 and under other conditions.31 These studies

62

suggest that bioactive components in glandless cottonseed could be value-added agricultural

63

products in cottonseed with health promotion and disease prevention potentials.

64

Triacylglycerols (TAGs) are the primary form of energy storage in eukaryotes. They also serve

65

as a reservoir of fatty acids for membrane biogenesis of the cells and can lead to obesity when

66

excessively accumulated in adipose tissues.32,33 Diacylglycerol acyltransferases (DGATs) esterify

67

sn-1,2-diacylglycerol with a long-chain fatty acyl-CoA and are responsible for the final and

68

rate-limiting step of TAG biosynthesis in eukaryotic organisms.34 It is generally accepted that

69

DGATs are divided into DGAT1 and DGAT2 subfamilies in animals and that additional DGAT3

70

subfamily are present in plants.34-37 Plants and animals deficient in DGATs accumulate less

4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

71

TAG.38-40 Animals with reduced DGAT activity are resistant to diet-induced obesity,39,41 lack milk

72

production39 and maybe subject to a congenital diarrheal disorder.42 Over-expression of the DGAT

73

enzymes increases TAG content in plants,43-45 animals46-48 and yeast.49 These genetic studies have

74

demonstrated that DGAT isoforms have non-redundant functions in TAG biosynthesis in species

75

such as mice40 and tung tree.37 Therefore, understanding the regulation of DGATs will help in the

76

development of transgenic plants and microbes with value-added properties and provide

77

information for therapeutic intervention for obesity and related diseases. It is well-known about

78

the number of DGAT isoforms and their expression profiles in some plants and animals, however,

79

little is known if DGAT gene expression is regulated by natural products.34,35

80

Plant flavanol and polyphenol compounds have potential therapeutic benefits. For example,

81

cinnamon polyphenols have been shown to improve lipid profiles of diabetic people.50 We

82

hypothesized that cottonseed may contain novel polypehnol compounds, which may be useful for

83

nutritional and/or medical purposes. The specific objective of this study was to test if extracts from

84

cottonseed have the capability to regulate DGAT gene expression in mammalian cells. We

85

investigated the regulation of DGAT gene expression by ethanol extracts isolated from glanded

86

and glandless cottonseed and compared directly with gossypol and lipopolysaccharides (LPS)

87

using cultured mouse macrophages.

88 89

MATERIALS AND METHODS

90

Cottonseed. Glanded and glandless cottonseeds were collected from variety “DP1321” and

91

“NuMex 15 GLS”, respectively.13 The long fibers in the cotton bolls were separated from the seeds

92

by ginning. The short fibers on the seeds (also called linters) were removed from the seeds with

93

concentrated sulfuric acid (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The seeds were washed with distilled water

5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 6 of 34

94

extensively followed by neutralizing any residual acid with sodium bicarbonate solution (Sigma).

95

Glanded seeds were smaller than glandless seeds and contained numerous dark-colored

96

gossypol-rich glands in the kernel (see Figure 1A).

97

Cottonseed Extracts. Ethanol extracts were isolated from the coat and kernel of glanded and

98

glandless cottonseeds according to a protocol for enriching polyphenolic compounds from

99

cinnamon bark.51,52 The protocol consisted of three steps for seed kernel extraction (fractionation,

100

defatting, and ethanol extraction) and four steps for seed coat extraction (fractionation, defatting,

101

acetic acid extraction, and ethanol extraction). Briefly, glanded and glandless cottonseeds were

102

fractionated into seed coat and kernel by dry grinding and then in a homogenization buffer (50 mM

103

Tris-HCl and 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). The kernel fractions were defatted by stirring in an equal

104

volume of chloroform (Sigma) followed by centrifugation.14 An equal volume of hexane (Sigma)

105

was added to the upper (aqueous) layer of chloroform extraction followed by mixing and

106

centrifugation. The lower (aqueous) layer of hexane extraction was used for ethanol extraction.

107

The seed coat fraction was suspended in acetic acid (Sigma), autoclaved and centrifuged before

108

ethanol extraction.52 Four volumes of ethanol (Sigma) were added to the kernel and coat fractions

109

followed by centrifugation and drying under rotoevaporation (Integrated SpeedVac System,

110

Thermo Fisher) until all ethanol was evaporated. The seed kernel extract was much darker in color

111

than the seed coat extract (see Figure 1B).

112

Cell Culture. Mouse RAW264.7 macrophages were purchased from American Type Culture

113

Collection (Manassas, VA). The basic cell culture protocol followed previous procedures using a

114

water jacket CO2 incubator (Forma Series II, Model 3100 Series, Thermo Fisher) and in a Logic+

115

A2 hood (Labconco, Kansas City, MO).52,53 Mouse RAW264.7 macrophages were maintained as

116

described54 in 75 cm2 polystyrene tissue culture flasks at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s

6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

117

modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 4.5 mg/ml (25 mM) glucose supplemented with

118

10% (v:v) fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM

119

L-glutamine (Gibco BRL, Thermo Fisher). RAW macrophages were mechanically dissociated

120

from the T-75 flask with a cell scraper, stained with equal volume of 0.4% trypsin blue dye before

121

counting the number of live cells with a TC20 Automatic Cell Counter (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

122

RAW macrophages were routinely observed before and during treatment with a Zoe Florescent

123

Cell Imager (Bio-Rad).

124

Chemical Treatment. Mouse RAW264.7 macrophages were sub-cultured at approximately 1

125

x 105 cells/ml density in 24-well tissue culture plates (CytoOne, USA Scientific, Ocala, FL) (0.5

126

ml/well). These cells were treated with 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 100 µg/ml of ethanol extracts

127

from cottonseed, 0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µg/ml of gossypol (Sigma), and 0, 10, 20, 50, 100,

128

500, and 1000 ng/ml of LPS (Sigma). The treatments lasted for 2 h, 8 h and 24 h (“0” treatment

129

corresponding to 1% DMSO) in the culture medium, the same DMSO concentration used to

130

suspend the chemicals followed by RNA extraction.

131

RNA Extraction. Mouse cells in 24-well plates were washed twice with 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl

132

and lysed directly with 1 ml of TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen). RNA was isolated according to the

133

manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentrations and integrity were determined using RNA 6000

134

Nano Assay Kit and the Bioanalyzer 2100 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Agilent

135

Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with RNA 6000 Ladder as the standard (Ambion, Inc., Austin,

136

TX, USA)55. RNA concentrations were also quantified with an Implen NanoPhotometer

137

(Munchen, Germany).

138

Quantitative Real-time PCR Analysis. The basic procedure of SYBR Green qPCR assay

139

was according to the MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative

7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 8 of 34

140

real-time PCR experiments.56 PCR primers and TaqMan probes (Biosearch Technologies, Inc.,

141

Petaluma, CA) were designed using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City,

142

CA). The Tms of the primers were variable to a few degrees but the Tms for the probes were

143

generally 10 degrees higher than the corresponding primers. The amplicon sizes and the nucleotide

144

sequences (5' to 3') of the forward primers, TaqMan probes (TET – BHQ1) and reverse primers,

145

respectively, are described in Table 1. The cDNAs were synthesized from total RNA using

146

SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies). The cDNA synthesis mixture (20 µl)

147

contained 2.5 µg total RNA, 2.4 µg oligo(dT)12-18 primer, 0.1 µg random primers, 500 µM dNTPs,

148

10 mM DTT, 40 units RNaseOUT and 200 units SuperScript II reverse transcriptase in 1X

149

first-strand synthesis buffer (Life Technologies). The cDNA synthesis reactions were incubated at

150

42°C for 50 min. The cDNA samples were stored in -80°C freezer and diluted with water to 1

151

ng/µl before qPCR analyses.

152

SYBR Green qPCR reaction mixtures contained 5 ng of total RNA-derived cDNAs, forward

153

primer, reverse primer and 1X iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).

154

The thermal cycle conditions were as follows: 3 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 10

155

s, 65°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. The qPCR reactions were performed in 96-well clear plates

156

sealed by adhesives with a CFX96 real-time system-C1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad

157

Laboratories).

158

Data Analysis. The ∆∆CT method of relative quantification was used to determine the fold

159

change in gene expression (refer to Table 2 as an example of calculation).57 First, the cycle of

160

threshold (CT) was obtained from three independent samples. Second, the first delta CT value

161

(∆CT) was obtained by subtracting the CT values of the internal reference control, mouse 60S

162

ribosome protein 32 (Rpl32) from the CT values of the target mRNA (∆CT = CTTarget - CTref). Third,

8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

163

the second delta CT value (∆∆CT) was obtained by subtracting the ∆CT of the calibrator (DMSO

164

control) from the ∆CT of the target mRNAs (∆∆CT= ∆CTTarget - ∆CTcal). Finally, the fold change in

165

expression was obtained using the equation 2-∆∆CT.

166

Statistics.

The data in the figures represent the mean and standard deviation of three

167

independent samples. They were analyzed by statistical analysis using ANOVA with SigmaStat

168

3.1 software (Systat Software). Multiple comparisons among the treatments with different time or

169

concentrations

170

Student-Newman-Keuls Method.52 Different lower case letters displayed above each of the

171

treatment concentration on the figures are significantly different between the treatment times at p