Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO LIBRARIES
Article
Crossing the Border between Laboratory and Field: Bacterial Quorum Quenching for Anti-Biofouling Strategy in an MBR Seonki Lee, Seung-Kook Park, Hyeokpil Kwon, Sang Hyun Lee, Kibaek Lee, Chang Hyun Nam, Sung Jun Jo, Hyun-Suk Oh, Pyung-Kyu Park, Kwang-Ho Choo, Chung-Hak Lee, and Taewoo Yi Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04795 • Publication Date (Web): 15 Jan 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 19, 2016
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Crossing the Border between Laboratory and Field:
2
Bacterial Quorum Quenching for Anti-Biofouling
3
Strategy in an MBR
4 5
Seonki Lee†, Seung-Kook Park‡, Hyeokpil Kwon†, Sang Hyun Lee†, Kibaek Lee†,
6
Chang Hyun Nahm†, Sung Jun Jo†, Hyun-Suk Oh†, Pyung-Kyu Park§, Kwang-Ho Choo∥,
7
Chung-Hak Lee*,†, and Taewoo Yi,**,‡
8 9
†
School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744,
10
Republic of Korea
11
‡
12
Republic of Korea
13
§
14
Korea
15
Hanwha Engineering and Construction, 76, Gajeong-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 305-804,
Department of Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Wonju, 220-710, Republic of
∥
Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 702-
16
701, Republic of Korea
17 18 19
*Corresponding author: Phone: +82-2-880-7075. Fax: +82-2-874-0896. E-mail:
[email protected] **Corresponding author: Phone: +82-41-950-5874. Fax: +82-41-950-5934. E-mail:
[email protected] 20 21
ABSTRACT
22
Quorum quenching (QQ) has recently been acknowledged to be a sustainable antifouling
23
strategy and has been investigated widely using lab-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR)
24
systems. This study attempted to bring this QQ-MBR closer to potential practical application.
25
Two types of pilot-scale QQ-MBRs with QQ bacteria entrapping beads (QQ-beads) were
26
installed and run at a wastewater treatment plant, feeding real municipal wastewater to test
27
the systems’ effectiveness for membrane fouling control and thus the amount of energy
28
savings, even under harsh environmental conditions. The rate of transmembrane pressure
29
(TMP) build-up was significantly mitigated in QQ-MBR compared to that in a conventional-
30
MBR. Consequently, QQ-MBR can substantially reduce energy consumption by reducing
31
coarse bubble aeration without compromising the effluent water quality. The addition of QQ1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
32
beads to a conventional MBR substantially affected the EPS concentrations, as well as
33
microbial floc size in the mixed liquor. Furthermore, the QQ activity and mechanical stability
34
of QQ-beads were well maintained for at least four months, indicating QQ-MBR has good
35
potential for practical applications.
36 37
INTRODUCTION
38
One of the pressing needs of people throughout the world is adequate supply of clean water.
39
Increasing water reuse through advanced wastewater treatment has become more urgent than
40
ever because of the water shortage accelerated by global population growth and climate
41
change.1, 2 For over thirty years, the membrane bioreactor (MBR) has attracted considerable
42
attention in the field of wastewater treatment and reuse. However, a critical issue in MBR
43
that awaits a technological advancement to solve is membrane biofouling, which leads to
44
high energy consumption and thus high operating costs.
45
Many studies utilizing diverse approaches have been conducted and reported to mitigate
46
this chronic issue of biofouling in MBRs, such as by modification of the membrane surface3,
47
by changes in physical cleaning strategies (such as back flushing, ultra-sonication,
48
mechanical cleaning, and vibration)4,5,6,7 or by adding specific media.7,8 Note that Yeon et al.9
49
revealed that quorum sensing plays a key role in biofilm formation on the membrane surface
50
in an MBR. Furthermore, they proved that the biofilm formation (biofouling) could be
51
mitigated substantially by disrupting signal molecules such as N-acyl homoserine lactones
52
(AHLs)10 using a quorum quenching enzyme.11,12,13,14 To overcome the drawbacks of
53
enzymatic quorum quenching, such as high cost of enzyme, bacterial quorum quenching was
54
developed.15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22 In detail, bacteria which produce quorum quenching enzymes
55
were isolated from a real MBR plant. Subsequently, those quorum quenching bacteria were
56
encapsulated in a vessel15,16,17,20 or entrapped in beads.18,21,22 They proved bacterial quorum
57
quenching is very efficient in both physical and biological effects on biofouling control in
58
MBR for wastewater treatment.
59
To date, however, most studies examining quorum quenching (QQ) MBR have been
60
performed in lab-scale reactors using synthetic wastewater. Although substantial mitigation
61
of biofouling by quorum quenching has been demonstrated, such an approach has not been
62
fully investigated in a larger pilot scale MBR using real wastewater. More often than not, the
63
microbial environment in lab-scale reactors is notably different from that in real full-scale 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 22
Page 3 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
64
reactors due to the different scales of the technological equipment and the different raw
65
wastewater characteristics.
66
The purpose of this study was to bring the QQ-MBR closer to potential practical
67
application by demonstrating the QQ effects in pilot-scale MBRs installed at a municipal
68
wastewater treatment plant and fed with real wastewater. Two MBR systems, one using a
69
one-stage (only one aerobic tank) process, and the other using a three-stage
70
(anaerobic/aerobic/membrane tanks) process, were operated for an extended period of more
71
than four months. To examine the life-span of encapsulated beads containing quorum
72
quenching bacteria under real wastewater condition, their QQ activity was monitored
73
regularly for that period. Considering that QQ may affect microbial floc size and extracellular
74
polymeric substance (EPS), the changes of protein, polysaccharide concentrations and floc
75
size distribution were monitored during the operation of conventional and QQ-MBRs. The
76
energy savings through the QQ-MBR was also evaluated relative to the energy consumption
77
of a conventional MBR.
78 79
MATERIALS AND METHODS
80 81
Preparation of the QQ-beads
82
QQ-beads were prepared using dripping method. However, the material and solidification
83
methods were modified to reinforce their stability by mixing polyvinyl alcohol and sodium
84
alginate solutions because QQ-beads made of alginate matrix are easily decomposed in real
85
wastewater. The mixture of polyvinyl alcohol, alginate and Rhodococcus sp. BH4 was
86
dripped into CaCl2-boric acid solution to form beads. Then, the beads were immersed in
87
sodium sulfate solution and stored in water. Rhodococcus sp. BH4, which was isolated from
88
a real MBR plant was used as a QQ bacterium in this study because its biofouling control
89
effect in MBR has been confirmed in a number of previous studies using synthetic
90
wastewater15,16,19,22 as well as it was reported to be capable of degrading a wide range of AHL
91
molecules by AHL-lactonase.24 The concentration of QQ bacteria (Rhodococcus sp. BH4) in
92
beads was approximately 4~5 mg per g of beads. The average size and density of QQ-beads
93
were approximately 4.3 mm and 1.05 g/mL, respectively.
94 95
MBR configurations and operation conditions 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
96
The two types of pilot-scale submerged MBRs, one- and three-stage MBRs, were installed at
97
a municipal wastewater treatment plant (Daejeon, Korea), as shown in Figure 1. The one-
98
stage MBR consisted of only an aerobic membrane tank which is a simple MBR system
99
mostly used in previous studies. In the one-stage MBR, two types of aeration devices were
100
equipped: one for oxygen supply to activated sludge, and the other for membrane scouring
101
(Figure 1a). The air supply for the microorganisms was constantly maintained at 10 L/min
102
during the entire operation period, whereas the air scrubbing volumes for membrane cleaning
103
were varied 0.3 ~ 0.9 SADm (specific aeration demand per membrane area, m3/m2/h). Two
104
one-stage MBRs with a working volume of 80 L of each were operated in parallel. In phase 1,
105
one reactor was used for a vacant-MBR (with vacant-beads) and the other was used for a QQ-
106
MBR (with QQ-beads). Same intensity of membrane aeration was maintained at 0.3 SADm
107
for both MBRs to confirm the QQ effect in real wastewater. In phase 2, one reactor was used
108
for a conventional-MBR (without bead) and the other was used for a QQ-MBR. Different
109
membrane aeration intensity was applied to investigate the potential of energy savings for
110
QQ-MBR, i.e., 0.9 SADm for the conventional-MBR whereas 0.3 SADm for QQ-MBR. For
111
each one-stage MBR, three C-PVC membranes with a pore size of 0.4 µm (Pure-envitech,
112
Korea) and an effective total surface area of 0.9 m2 were used. The flux was maintained at a
113
constant 20 L/m2/h (LMH) in a continuous cycle of filtration (10 minutes), followed by
114
relaxation (two minutes).
115
A real conventional MBR system is composed of biological nutrient removal processes,
116
such as anoxic-aerobic (A/O) or anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic (A2O) processes. To bring the
117
QQ-MBR closer to potential practical application, the one-stage MBR was expanded to a
118
three-stage MBR with an additional anoxic process for nutrient removal. The three-stage
119
MBR consisted of an anoxic, an aerobic and a membrane tank. An air diffuser was equipped
120
in each of the aerobic and membrane tanks (Figure 1b). Two three-stage MBRs were
121
operated in parallel: one was a conventional-MBR (without beads) and the other was a QQ-
122
MBR (with QQ-beads). Polyethersulfone membranes with a pore size of 0.04 µm (Microdyn-
123
Nadir, Germany) were applied, giving an effective total surface area of 3.5 m3 to each MBR.
124
Identical diffusers were equipped in each aerobic tank for oxygen supply and in each
125
membrane tank for membrane cleaning. The aeration rate for oxygen supply and membrane
126
cleaning were constantly maintained at 8 L/min in an aerobic tank and 0.34 SADm in a
127
membrane tank, respectively. The flux was maintained at 15 L/m2/h (LMH) in a continuous
128
cycle of filtration (10 minutes) followed by relaxation (2 minutes). Influent was fed into the 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 22
Page 5 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
129
anoxic tank, while activated sludge in the membrane tank was continuously recirculated into
130
anoxic tank with a recirculation rate of 2.5 Q.
131
In both types of MBRs, activated sludge was directly taken from the wastewater treatment
132
plant and real wastewater, which passed sedimentation tank and screen, was fed as the
133
influent. A mesh screen (size: about 2 mm) was placed in the membrane tank so that vacant-
134
or QQ-beads (size: about 4.3 mm) were constantly retained in the membrane tank in each
135
MBR. TMP is defined as the pressure difference between broth and permeate side of a
136
membrane in a submerged MBR. The extent of biofouling in each MBR was quantitatively
137
evaluated by monitoring the TMP which increases to compensate for the membrane-fouling
138
under constant flux operation. When the TMP reached above 25 kPa during the MBR
139
operation, used membrane was taken out and chemical washing with 1,000 ppm of NaOCl
140
solution was conducted, which resulted in more than 96% of permeability recovery. The
141
operating conditions of each MBR and other important specifications are provided in Table 1.
142 143
Bioassay for the detection of QS bacteria producing AHLs
144
LB agar covered with X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside) was used
145
for the bioassay. These assays consisted of streaking the AHL reporter strain, A. tumefaciens
146
A13623, on the plate, and then placing each sample to be tested. If the sample produces or
147
contains AHLs, then they diffuse through the agar, developing a blue color in the reporter
148
strain as a result. Positive and negative controls consisted of standard C8-HSL and distilled
149
water, respectively.
150 151
Bioluminescence assay for measuring the AHLs
152
The AHL molecules were measured via a bioluminescence assay24. First, the reporter strains
153
of A. tumefaciens A136 and the AHL sample were mixed and loaded into 96-well-plate. The
154
plate was placed on an incubator to maintain the temperature at 30 °C for 90 min, and then
155
Beta-Glo® Assay System (Promega, USA) solution was added into each well. After 40 min,
156
the luminescence intensity was measured by using a luminometer (Synergy 2, Bio-Tek, USA).
157
The concentration of AHL samples were determined by plotting the calibration curve of
158
standard AHLs.
159 160
Measurement of the biological and mechanical stability of the QQ-beads 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
161
The activity of QQ-beads was determined by the degradation rate of C8-HSL (N-octanoyl-DL-
162
homoserine lactone). C8-HSL was chosen as a representative AHL molecule because it is one
163
of the dominant AHL molecules in MBRs for wastewater treatment.9,15 Standard C8-HSL
164
(Sigma Aldrich, USA) was dissolved in Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 7) to a final
165
concentration of 200 nM. Next, 50 QQ-beads were added to 20 mL of the C8-HSL solution
166
and then reacted using orbital shaker at 50 rpm at 25 °C. The residual concentration of C8-
167
HSL was measured using a bioluminescence assay. To determine the biological stability of
168
QQ bead in a continuous MBR, 50 QQ-beads were withdrawn and strongly washed for
169
measurement of the residual QQ activity. The relative QQ activity at each time point was
170
calculated by the ratio of residual activity to initial activity. Furthermore, the viability of the
171
entrapped BH4 into QQ-beads was visually observed using a confocal laser scanning
172
microscope (CLSM, C1 plus, Nikon, Japan) after staining with live/dead kit (Molecular
173
Probes, USA).
174
To investigate the mechanical stability of QQ-beads during MBR operation, compression
175
tests were performed using a texture analyzer (CT3 4500, Brookfield, USA) at a mobile
176
probe (TA44) speed of 0.5 mm/s up to 50% deformation of beads. The hardness work, a
177
measure of energy required to compress the sample, was calculated as the area under the
178
curve of the compression plot.21
179 180
Analytical methods
181
EPS (extracellular polymeric substances) concentrations in the mixed liquor and the biofilm
182
were analyzed in both vacant- and QQ-MBRs. Soluble EPS were obtained by centrifuging the
183
mixed liquor (6000 rpm, 10 min) and then filtering the supernatant through a 0.45-µm syringe
184
filter. Bound EPS was extracted from the pellet (activated sludge floc). EPS in the biofilm
185
was obtained as follows. First, a used membrane was taken from a membrane tank and briefly
186
washed with tap water. Next, the biofilm was detached from the used membrane via
187
sonication (10 min) and then extracted using the modified thermal extraction method.25 The
188
proteins and polysaccharides in the EPS were quantitatively determined using the Bradford
189
assay and the phenol-sulfuric acid method, respectively.26
190
Mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen
191
(TN) and ammonia-nitrogen (NH4-N) were measured according to standard methods. The
192
average floc size was measured using a particle size analyzer (Microtrac S3500).
193 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 22
Page 7 of 22
194
Environmental Science & Technology
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
195 196
QQ effects on the performance of the one-stage MBR fed with real wastewater
197
The pilot-scale MBR experiments were conducted to investigate the influence of real
198
wastewater on QQ effect instead of the synthetic wastewater because the characteristics of
199
influent wastewater should have a large impact on MBR performance.27 Prior to applying
200
QQ-beads into the MBRs, a bioassay test was conducted to confirm the presence of QS
201
bacteria producing AHLs in the real wastewater. As shown in Figure S1, it was revealed that
202
QS bacteria existed in the feed wastewater as well as the activated sludge used for inoculum
203
in this study. In phase 1, vacant-beads with no QQ-bacterium and QQ-beads entrapped with
204
QQ-bacteria were placed into the first one-stage MBR (Vacant-MBR) and the second one-
205
stage MBR (QQ-MBR), respectively. The loading rate of the beads in each one-stage MBR
206
was 1% in v/v (volume of beads/volume of reactor), while the same intensity of membrane
207
aeration was maintained at 0.3 m3/m2/h (SADm) for both MBRs.
208
As shown in Figure 2a, the rate of TMP build-up, which reflects the extent of membrane
209
biofouling, was delayed by approximately 500% in the QQ-MBR compared with that in the
210
vacant-MBR. Biofouling reduction in QQ-MBR could be attributed to both a biological effect
211
due to quorum quenching of the QQ-beads and a physical effect due to friction between the
212
beads and the membrane. Assuming that the physical cleaning effect by beads would be
213
identical in both vacant- and QQ-MBRs because of the equal bead loading, the delay of the
214
TMP build-up rate in QQ-MBR can be attributed solely to the QQ activity of the QQ-beads.
215
The characteristics of real wastewater are more variable and unsteady, unlike that of synthetic
216
wastewater, as shown in Figure S2. Note that biofouling control through bacterial QQ can
217
also be achieved in an MBR, which suggests the QQ-MBR is approaching closer and closer
218
to practical application.
219 220
QQ effects on EPS relevant to biofouling
221
Quorum sensing is known to be the cell-to-cell communication between microorganisms,
222
which determines phenotypes, such as secretion of EPS, biofilm formation, and virulence.28,29
223
Many previous studies on QQ-MBR using synthetic wastewater reported that the
224
concentration of EPS was decreased in a QQ-MBR.12,18,19,20,22 To confirm the change in EPS
225
concentration in the QQ-MBR fed with real wastewater, EPS analysis of the mixed liquor and
226
the biocake were conducted for both vacant- and QQ-MBRs. 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
227
After the same operating period of 14 days, the used membrane modules were taken out
228
from both vacant- and QQ-MBRs to measure the amount of total attached biomass (TAB)
229
and EPS in the biocake on the membrane surface. Mixed liquor in each MBR was also
230
sampled to measure the total (i.e., polysaccharides plus protein) soluble and bound EPS (EPS
231
in activated sludge floc). The total soluble and the total bound EPS in the mixed liquor in the
232
QQ-MBR were reduced by approximately 60% (Figure 3a) and 15% (Figure 3b), respectively,
233
compared to those in the vacant-MBR. It has been reported that the soluble EPS may have
234
great influence on the membrane-biofouling in MBR.30,31,32 Especially, Wisniewski et al.32
235
revealed the significant role of the soluble fraction of EPS on membrane permeability. Thus,
236
even though our results show that the amount of soluble EPS was much smaller than that of
237
bound EPS in the mixed liquor, the 60% reduction of soluble EPS through QQ-beads could
238
substantially mitigate the biofouling in QQ-MBR. The TAB per unit area of membrane in the
239
vacant-MBR (420 mg/m2) was much greater than that in the QQ-MBR (60 mg/m2), indicating
240
much lower biomass was accumulated on the membrane surface in QQ-MBR after the same
241
operation period. Moreover, the concentration of polysaccharide per unit membrane surface
242
was significantly reduced in the QQ-MBR (Figure 3c). It has been reported that EPS plays a
243
great role in biofilm formation and is also a key foulant of membrane-biofouling in an
244
MBR.30,33,34,35 Thus, one of the main reasons why QQ-beads mitigate biofouling in MBR fed
245
with real wastewater could be a reduction of soluble EPS in the mixed liquor as well as the
246
reduction of EPS in the biocake.
247
Although TMP rise-up rate was delayed, membrane-fouling still occurred in QQ-MBR. It
248
may be related to other membrane-fouling mechanisms such as pore blocking, sludge
249
accumulation, and other types of quorum sensing.
250 251
Comparison of the energy consumption between conventional- and QQ-MBRs
252
In submerged MBR systems, coarse bubble aeration for membrane scouring is a major energy
253
consumer, often exceeding 50% share of the total energy consumption (Figure S3).
254
Consequently, many efforts36,37 have been made and reported to reduce the energy consumed
255
for membrane scouring. As we confirmed that the rate of TMP rise-up was substantially
256
delayed in the QQ-MBR, we attempted to quantitatively evaluate how much energy savings
257
would be achieved by the addition of QQ-beads. For that purpose, the conventional- and QQ-
258
MBRs were run in parallel, applying the same aeration intensity for the oxygen supply, but 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 22
Page 9 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
259
with different coarse bubble aeration conditions for membrane cleaning. The specific aeration
260
demand per membrane surface area (SADm) was 0.9 m3/m2/h for the conventional-MBR,
261
whereas it was 0.3 m3/m2/h for the QQ-MBR. In other words, the membrane aeration
262
intensity in the QQ-MBR was reduced to one third of that in the conventional-MBR. As
263
shown in Figure 2b, even though the conventional-MBR was operated at threefold greater air
264
scrubbing intensity, the TMP rise-up rate in the conventional-MBR was faster than that in the
265
QQ-MBR.
266
Based on Figure 2b, the specific filtration energy required for permeate suction and specific
267
aeration energy for membrane cleaning in one-stage MBRs were estimated using equations (1)
268
& (2), which were derived with some assumptions described in the SI. Figure 4 shows a
269
comparison of the specific energy consumed for filtration (permeate suction) and air
270
scrubbing between the conventional- and QQ-MBRs. The difference in the filtration energy
271
consumption was not as high as that in air scrubbing for membrane cleaning. Note that the
272
specific energy consumption for membrane scouring in the conventional-MBR was
273
approximately three-times greater than that in the QQ-MBR. The specific energy
274
consumption for both items was approximately 0.46 kWh/m3 in the conventional-MBR,
275
whereas the amount was 0.20 kWh/m3 in the QQ-MBR. In short, QQ-MBR could reduce the
276
biofouling related energy consumption by approximately 60%. In addition, considering the
277
labor and chemical costs required for chemical cleaning of the used membranes, the operating
278
cost could further be reduced in the QQ-MBR.
279 280
QQ effect in the three-stage MBR fed with real wastewater
281
Figure 5 shows the profiles of TMP rise-up in the conventional- and QQ-MBRs operated at
282
the same aeration intensity (0.34 m3/m2/h). It took approximately 18 days in the
283
conventional-MBR, whereas it took 35 days in the QQ-MBR, to reach the TMP of 20 kPa. In
284
other words, the rate of TMP rise-up was delayed by approximately 100% in the QQ-MBR
285
through the addition of QQ-beads to the membrane tank. This result indicates that the QQ
286
effect on the membrane fouling is also valid in the three-stage MBR system with an anoxic
287
process. However, the extent of the delay of TMP rise-up decreased from 500% (Figure 2a)
288
for the one-stage MBR to 100% (Figure 5) in the three-stage MBR. This reduced
289
performance might be attributed to the activated sludge recycle throughout the three tanks
290
and/or the considerably smaller loading volume of the QQ-beads (v/v) in the three-stage
291
MBR [0.27% (v/v)], which was approximately one-third of that in the one-stage MBR [1% 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
292
(v/v)]. Further research should be performed to determine the best operating conditions that
293
are able to optimize the use of the QQ-beads in the QQ-MBR. In addition, the difference of
294
MBR process between the one- and three-stage MBRs could give rise to the change of
295
microbial community, which might be another cause of reduced performance.
296 297
QQ effect on the floc size of the activated sludge
298
Microbial floc size is one of the important factors of the floc characteristics and is related to
299
membrane-biofouling.38,39 However, some reports on the QS/QQ effects on floc size are
300
contradictory to each other. It was reported that the granule formation and size is closely
301
related to AHL-based QS.40, 41 Jiang et al.14 found that the size of the activated sludge floc
302
was decreased by quorum quenching. However, Weerasekara et al.19 reported the change of
303
microbial floc size could be attributed to microbial adaptation when seeded into a new reactor,
304
instead of the effect of QQ.
305
In this work, in the one-stage MBR, the average floc size in the conventional-MBR was
306
106 µm, but that in the QQ-MBR was 88 µm (approximately 20% reduction), as shown in
307
Figure S4 and Figure 6. In the three-stage MBR, however, the floc size in all three tanks
308
became much smaller than that in one-stage MBRs. Moreover, no significant difference of
309
the average floc size was observed, not only between three tanks but also between the
310
conventional- and QQ-MBRs in each tank. Kim et al.33 and McMillan et al.42 mentioned that
311
activated sludge can be mechanically broken by the pumping device. In the three-stage MBR,
312
microbial flocs are continuously recirculated via the high flow rate of the recirculation pump
313
(2.5Q, 1.7 L/min), so that they could be broken mechanically by pumping shear, which may
314
be more powerful than the QQ effect. Consequently, the microbial floc size would be
315
equalized, regardless of the tank types.
316 317
QQ effect on the effluent quality
318
QQ-MBR inhibited biofouling and thus could substantially reduce the energy consumption of
319
the MBR. However, we cannot go further without verifying the effluent water quality in the
320
QQ-MBR because it must be one of the main factors in the evaluation of MBR performance.
321
It has been reported that certain nitrifying, denitrifying and nitrogen fixation bacteria were
322
involved in quorum sensing.43,44,45,46 In addition, QQ could affect the metabolism of QS 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 22
Page 11 of 22
323
Environmental Science & Technology
bacteria in the activated sludge.
324
We monitored the removal efficiencies of some pollutants, such as COD, T-N, NH4-N and
325
NO3-N for one-stage and three-stage MBRs. However, there was no significant difference
326
between conventional- and QQ-MBRs in both one-stage and three-stage MBRs (Figure 7 and
327
Table S2). This result indicates that quorum quenching has no adverse effect on the effluent
328
water quality in QQ-MBR fed with real wastewater.
329 330
Stability of the QQ-beads in the long-term operation of the QQ-MBR
331
On the path toward the practical application of a QQ-MBR, long-term stability of the QQ-
332
beads is required because a short life span of QQ-beads would require their frequent
333
replacement, which would increase the operational cost of the QQ-MBR. Thus, the stability
334
of QQ-beads in terms of the QQ activity, viability and mechanical strength were tested during
335
the long-term (100 ~ 140 days) operation of both QQ-MBRs.
336
The used QQ-beads were intermittently removed from the aerobic tank (one-stage MBR)
337
or the membrane tank (three-stage MBR). Next, the relative QQ-activity, defined by the
338
degradation ratio of standard C8-HSL for 120 min in the presence of used QQ-beads, was
339
monitored and plotted against the operating time (Figure 8). In the one-stage QQ-MBR, the
340
relative activity of QQ-beads decreased by 40% of their initial activity during 25 days, but
341
increased slowly up to the initial QQ activity level after approximately 60 days. In the three-
342
stage MBR, the relative activity of QQ-beads decreased by approximately 10% to 20% of the
343
initial activity during 100 days of operation. A possible explanation for the initial decrease of
344
the QQ activities might be that the QQ bacteria were adapting themselves to the new
345
environment when they were exposed to the real wastewater.
346
In parallel with the relative QQ activity of the QQ-beads, live/dead cells in the QQ-beads
347
were also observed intermittently in the three-stage QQ-MBR to monitor the survival of the
348
QQ bacteria. Because it is nearly impossible for bacteria outside the beads to migrate into the
349
beads as shown in Figure S6, it had been concluded that cells shown in Figure S5 were
350
Rhodococucs Sp. BH4 which were initially entrapped into the QQ-beads. The population of
351
live cells (Figure S5a) appeared to be much higher than that of the dead cells (Figure S5b),
352
i.e., the viability of QQ bacteria were well maintained at least for 100 days. Consequently, it
353
is believed that QQ bacteria could live on the substrates and nutrients in real wastewater. In
354
addition, the relative mechanical strength of the QQ-beads, defined by the ratio of residual
355
mechanical strength to its initial value, was measured intermittently during 100 days 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
356
operation. As shown in Figure S7, the change of the mechanical strength appeared to be
357
negligible.
358
All these results showed that the biological and mechanical stabilities of the QQ-beads were
359
well maintained, even in the harsh environment of real wastewater during the relatively long-
360
term operation of the QQ-MBR.
361
In summary, we demonstrated the effectiveness of quorum quenching for biofouling
362
control in two types of pilot-scale MBRs fed with real municipal wastewater. A QQ-MBR
363
with QQ bacteria entrapping beads could alleviate membrane fouling and thus could
364
significantly reduce energy consumption by reducing the aeration intensity required for
365
membrane cleaning compared with that in a conventional-MBR. Moreover, bacterial QQ was
366
determined to have no influence on the effluent water quality of the MBR systems. The QQ
367
activity, as well as mechanical stability of QQ-beads, was found to be well-maintained, even
368
under harsh real wastewater conditions, during the four months of operation. This study is
369
expected to bring QQ-MBR closer to possible practical applications.
370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396
Supporting Information Additional figures and table. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by the Commercializations Promotion Agency for R&D Outcomes (COMPA) (2014K000240) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MISP) and Convergence Technology Program (2015001640001) funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE). REFERENCES (1) Green, T. R.; Taniguchi, M.; Kooi, H.; Gurdak, J. J.; Allen, D. M.; Hiscock, K. M.; Treidel, H.; Aureli, A., Beneath the surface of global change: Impacts of climate change on groundwater. Journal of Hydrology 2011, 405, (3–4), 532-560. (2) Oki, T.; Kanae, S., Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science 2006, 313, (5790), 1068-72. (3) Liu, C. X.; Zhang, D. R.; He, Y.; Zhao, X. S.; Bai, R., Modification of membrane surface for anti-biofouling performance: Effect of anti-adhesion and anti-bacteria approaches. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 346, (1), 121-130. (4) Judd, S., The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for water and Wastewater Treatment, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam; Boston, 2011. (5) Kobayashi, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Hosaka, Y.; Fujii, N., Ultrasound-enhanced membranecleaning processes applied water treatments: influence of sonic frequency on filtration treatments. Ultrasonics 2003, 41, (3), 185-190. (6) van den Brink, P.; Vergeldt, F.; Van As, H.; Zwijnenburg, A.; Temmink, H.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., Potential of mechanical cleaning of membranes from a membrane bioreactor. Journal of 12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 22
Page 13 of 22
397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449
Environmental Science & Technology
Membrane Science 2013, 429, 259-267. (7) Yang, X.; Wang, R.; Fane, A. G.; Tang, C. Y.; Wenten, I. G., Membrane module design and dynamic shear-induced techniques to enhance liquid separation by hollow fiber modules: a review. Desalination and Water Treatment 2013, 51, (16-18), 3604-3627. (8) Lee, W.-N.; Kang, I.-J.; Lee, C.-H., Factors affecting filtration characteristics in membranecoupled moving bed biofilm reactor. Water Research 2006, 40, (9), 1827-1835. (9) Yeon, K. M.; Cheong, W. S.; Oh, H. S.; Lee, W. N.; Hwang, B. K.; Lee, C. H.; Beyenal, H.; Lewandowski, Z., Quorum sensing: a new biofouling control paradigm in a membrane bioreactor for advanced wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43, (2), 380-5. (10) Fuqua, C.; Parsek, M. R.; Greenberg, E. P., Regulation of gene expression by cell-to-cell communication: acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing. Annu Rev Genet 2001, 35, 439-68. (11) Yeon, K. M.; Lee, C. H.; Kim, J., Magnetic enzyme carrier for effective biofouling control in the membrane bioreactor based on enzymatic quorum quenching. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43, (19), 7403-9. (12) Kim, J. H.; Choi, D. C.; Yeon, K. M.; Kim, S. R.; Lee, C. H., Enzyme-immobilized nanofiltration membrane to mitigate biofouling based on quorum quenching. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45, (4), 1601-7. (13) Kim, H.-W.; Oh, H.-S.; Kim, S.-R.; Lee, K.-B.; Yeon, K.-M.; Lee, C.-H.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.-K., Microbial population dynamics and proteomics in membrane bioreactors with enzymatic quorum quenching. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97, (10), 4665-4675. (14) Jiang, W.; Xia, S.; Liang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Hermanowicz, S. W., Effect of quorum quenching on the reactor performance, biofouling and biomass characteristics in membrane bioreactors. Water Res 2013, 47, (1), 187-96. (15) Oh, H. S.; Yeon, K. M.; Yang, C. S.; Kim, S. R.; Lee, C. H.; Park, S. Y.; Han, J. Y.; Lee, J. K., Control of membrane biofouling in MBR for wastewater treatment by quorum quenching bacteria encapsulated in microporous membrane. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46, (9), 4877-84. (16) Jahangir, D.; Oh, H.-S.; Kim, S.-R.; Park, P.-K.; Lee, C.-H.; Lee, J.-K., Specific location of encapsulated quorum quenching bacteria for biofouling control in an external submerged membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science 2012, 411–412, 130-136. (17) Cheong, W.-S.; Lee, C.-H.; Moon, Y.-H.; Oh, H.-S.; Kim, S.-R.; Lee, S. H.; Lee, C.-H.; Lee, J.-K., Isolation and Identification of Indigenous Quorum Quenching Bacteria, Pseudomonas sp. 1A1, for Biofouling Control in MBR. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2013, 52, (31), 1055410560. (18) Kim, S. R.; Oh, H. S.; Jo, S. J.; Yeon, K. M.; Lee, C. H.; Lim, D. J.; Lee, C. H.; Lee, J. K., Biofouling control with bead-entrapped quorum quenching bacteria in membrane bioreactors: physical and biological effects. Environ Sci Technol 2013, 47, (2), 836-42. (19) Weerasekara, N. A.; Choo, K.-H.; Lee, C.-H., Hybridization of physical cleaning and quorum quenching to minimize membrane biofouling and energy consumption in a membrane bioreactor. Water Research 2014, 67, 1-10. (20) Cheong, W. S.; Kim, S. R.; Oh, H. S.; Lee, S. H.; Yeon, K. M.; Lee, C. H.; Lee, J. K., Design of quorum quenching microbial vessel to enhance cell viability for biofouling control in membrane bioreactor. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 24, (1), 97-105. (21) Kim, S.-R.; Lee, K.-B.; Kim, J.-E.; Won, Y.-J.; Yeon, K.-M.; Lee, C.-H.; Lim, D.-J., Macroencapsulation of quorum quenching bacteria by polymeric membrane layer and its application to MBR for biofouling control. Journal of Membrane Science 2015, 473, 109-117. (22) Maqbool, T.; Khan, S. J.; Waheed, H.; Lee, C.-H.; Hashmi, I.; Iqbal, H., Membrane biofouling retardation and improved sludge characteristics using quorum quenching bacteria in submerged membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science 2015, 483, 75-83. (23) Fuqua, C.; Winans, S. C., Conserved cis-acting promoter elements are required for densitydependent transcription of Agrobacterium tumefaciens conjugal transfer genes. Journal of Bacteriology 1996, 178, (2), 435-40. (24) Oh, H. S.; Kim, S. R.; Cheong, W. S.; Lee, C. H.; Lee, J. K., Biofouling inhibition in MBR by Rhodococcus sp. BH4 isolated from real MBR plant. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97, (23), 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502
10223-31. (25) Zhang, H.; Xia, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yang, F., Mechanism of calcium mitigating membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors. J Environ Sci (China) 2009, 21, (8), 1066-73. (26) DuBois, M.; Gilles, K. A.; Hamilton, J. K.; Rebers, P. A.; Smith, F., Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances. Analytical Chemistry 1956, 28, (3), 350-356. (27) Miura, Y.; Hiraiwa, M. N.; Ito, T.; Itonaga, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Okabe, S., Bacterial community structures in MBRs treating municipal wastewater: Relationship between community stability and reactor performance. Water Research 2007, 41, (3), 627-637. (28) Fuqua, C.; Winans, S. C.; Greenberg, E. P., Census and consensus in bacterial ecosystems: the LuxR-LuxI family of quorum-sensing transcriptional regulators. Annu Rev Microbiol 1996, 50, 727-51. (29) Dobretsov, S.; Teplitski, M.; Paul, V., Mini-review: quorum sensing in the marine environment and its relationship to biofouling. Biofouling 2009, 25, (5), 413-27. (30) Jarusutthirak, C.; Amy, G., Role of Soluble Microbial Products (SMP) in Membrane Fouling and Flux Decline. Environmental Science & Technology 2006, 40, (3), 969-974. (31) Rosenberger, S.; Laabs, C.; Lesjean, B.; Gnirss, R.; Amy, G.; Jekel, M.; Schrotter, J. C., Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Research 2006, 40, (4), 710-720. (32) Wisniewski, C.; Grasmick, A., Floc size distribution in a membrane bioreactor and consequences for membrane fouling. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 1998, 138, (2–3), 403-411. (33) Kim, J. S.; Lee, C. H.; Chang, I. S., Effect of pump shear on the performance of a crossflow membrane bioreactor. Water Res 2001, 35, (9), 2137-44. (34) Nagaoka, H.; Ueda, S.; Miya, A., Influence of bacterial extracellular polymers on the membrane separation activated sludge process. Water Science and Technology 1996, 34, (9), 165-172. (35) Wang, Z.; Wu, Z.; Tang, S., Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Research 2009, 43, (9), 2504-2512. (36) Wu, J.; He, C., Effect of cyclic aeration on fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Water Research 2012, 46, (11), 3507-3515. (37) Siembida, B.; Cornel, P.; Krause, S.; Zimmermann, B., Effect of mechanical cleaning with granular material on the permeability of submerged membranes in the MBR process. Water Research 2010, 44, (14), 4037-4046. (38) Le-Clech, P.; Chen, V.; Fane, T. A. G., Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 284, (1–2), 17-53. (39) Kang, I.-J.; Lee, C.-H.; Kim, K.-J., Characteristics of microfiltration membranes in a membrane coupled sequencing batch reactor system. Water Research 2003, 37, (5), 1192-1197. (40) Tan, C. H.; Koh, K. S.; Xie, C.; Tay, M.; Zhou, Y.; Williams, R.; Ng, W. J.; Rice, S. A.; Kjelleberg, S., The role of quorum sensing signalling in EPS production and the assembly of a sludge community into aerobic granules. ISME J 2014, 8, (6), 1186-1197. (41) Li, Y.; Lv, J.; Zhong, C.; Hao, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, J., Performance and role of N-acylhomoserine lactone (AHL)-based quorum sensing (QS) in aerobic granules. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2014, 26, (8), 1615-1621. (42) McMillan, J. D.; Wheaton, F. W.; Hochheimer, J. N.; Soares, J., Pumping effect on particle sizes in a recirculating aquaculture system. Aquacultural Engineering 2003, 27, (1), 53-59. (43) De Clippeleir, H.; Defoirdt, T.; Vanhaecke, L.; Vlaeminck, S.; Carballa, M.; Verstraete, W.; Boon, N., Long-chain acylhomoserine lactones increase the anoxic ammonium oxidation rate in an OLAND biofilm. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 90, (4), 1511-1519. (44) Toyofuku, M.; Nomura, N.; Fujii, T.; Takaya, N.; Maseda, H.; Sawada, I.; Nakajima, T.; Uchiyama, H., Quorum Sensing Regulates Denitrification in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Journal of Bacteriology 2007, 189, (13), 4969-4972. (45) Burton, E. O.; Read, H. W.; Pellitteri, M. C.; Hickey, W. J., Identification of AcylHomoserine Lactone Signal Molecules Produced by Nitrosomonas europaea Strain Schmidt. Applied 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 22
Page 15 of 22
503 504 505 506 507 508 509
Environmental Science & Technology
and Environmental Microbiology 2005, 71, (8), 4906-4909. (46) Batchelor, S. E.; Cooper, M.; Chhabra, S. R.; Glover, L. A.; Stewart, G. S.; Williams, P.; Prosser, J. I., Cell density-regulated recovery of starved biofilm populations of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997, 63, (6), 2281-6.
Table 1. MBR operating conditions One-stage MBR
Reactor type
510
Three-stage MBR
(Aerobic tank)
(Anoxic/aerobic/membrane tanks)
Total working volume (L)
80
450 (150 / 150 / 150)
Total HRT (h)
5.2
10.7
SRT (day)
25 days
Nearly infinite
Membrane type
C-PVC, Flat sheet
PES, Flat sheet
Membrane area (m2) / pore size (µm)
0.9 / 0.4
3.5 / 0.04
pH
6.5 ~ 7
6.5 ~ 7
MLSS (mg/L)
10,000 ~ 13,000
5,800 ~ 8,000
Flux (LMH)
20
15
Filtration mode (filtration/relaxation, min/min)
10 / 2
8/2
Aeration for oxygen supply (L/min)
10
8
Aeration for membrane scouring (SADm, m3/m2/h)
0.3 - 0.9
0.34
Concentration of beads (%, v(beads) / v(membrane tank))
1
0.8
SADm: specific aeration demand per membrane surface (m3/m2/h)
511
15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520
Figure 1. MBR configurations. (a) Two one-stage MBRs in parallel, each of which consists of only a membrane tank where two types of aerations are equipped: one for oxygen supply to activated sludge, and the other for membrane scouring. (b) Two three-stage MBRs in parallel, each of which consists of an anoxic, an aerobic and a membrane tank.
16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 22
Page 17 of 22
521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530
Environmental Science & Technology
Figure 2. TMP profiles during the operation of two one-stage MBRs in two phases. (a) phase 1; TMP rise-up in the vacant- and QQ-MBRs at the same aeration intensity (SADm= 0.3 m3/m2/h). (b) phase 2; TMP rise-up in the conventional-MBR (SADm= 0.9 m3/m2/h) and QQMBR (SADm= 0.3 m3/m2/h) at the different aeration intensity.
531 532
(a)
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
533 534
535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542
(b)
(c)
Figure 3. EPS analysis in one-stage vacant- and QQ-MBRs. (a) Soluble EPS. (b) Bound EPS (EPS in activated sludge floc). (c) EPS in biocake. *Concentration of polysaccharides in biocakes in QQ-MBR was below the detection limit. Each bar represents the average value of duplicate measurements. Error bar: standard deviation (n=2).
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 22
Page 19 of 22
543 544 545 546 547 548 549
Environmental Science & Technology
Figure 4. Comparison of energy consumption related to biofouling between one-stage conventional- and QQ-MBRs. It was assumed that only two parameters, membrane aeration and filtration energy were affected by biofouling control of QQ.
19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
550 551 552 553
Figure 5. TMP profile of three-stage conventional- and QQ-MBRs at the same membrane aeration intensity (SADm= 0.34 m3/m2/h). 160
Average microbial floc size (um)
One-stage MBR (n=1) 140
Three-stage MBR (n=4)
Vacant-MBR QQ-MBR
Conventional-MBR QQ-MBR
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Aerobic Aerobic tank
554
Anoxic tank
Aerobic tank Membrane tank
555
Figure 6. Average microbial floc size in one-stage and three-stage MBRs. Error bar: standard
556
deviation (n=4). 20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 22
Page 21 of 22
Environmental Science & Technology
120 One-stage MBR (n=4)
Removal efficiency (%)
100
Three-stage MBR (n=3)
Conventional-MBR QQ-MBR
80
60
40
20
0
COD 35 557
T-N 36
NH 374-N
COD 38
T-N 39
NH 404-N
558
Figure 7. Effluent water quality of one-stage and three-stage MBRs. (COD: chemical oxygen
559
demand, T-N: total nitrogen, NH4-N: ammonia-nitrogen). Error bar: standard deviation. (n=4
560
for one-stage MBR, n=3 for three-stage MBR).
561
21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 22 of 22
1.2 One-stage MBR Three-stage MBR
Relative QQ activity
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0 0
562 563 564 565 566 567
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Time (day)
Figure 8. Variation of the relative QQ activity of the QQ-beads during the operation of onestage and three-stage MBRs. QQ activity: degradation ratio of standard C8-HSL for 120 min in the presence of QQ-beads. TOC/Abstract Art
568
22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment