Differentiation Using Microwave Plasma Torch ... - ACS Publications

Mar 8, 2017 - ABSTRACT: The molecular fingerprinting of intact fruit samples combined with statistical data analysis can allow the assessment of fruit...
19 downloads 14 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Newcastle, Australia

Article

Differentiation Using Microwave Plasma Torch Desorption Mass Spectrometry of Navel Oranges Cultivated in Neighboring Habitats Wang Xinchen, Yang Meiling, Wang Zhiyuan, Hua Zhang, Guofeng Wang, Deng min, Huanwen Chen, and Luo Liping J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00553 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Mar 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 12, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Differentiation Using Microwave Plasma Torch

2

Desorption Mass Spectrometry of Navel

3

Oranges Cultivated in Neighboring Habitats

4

5

Xinchen Wang,† Meiling Yang,† Zhiyuan Wang,§ Hua Zhang,† Guofeng Wang,† Min Deng,‡

6

Huanwen Chen,*,† and Liping Luo*,‡

7 8



Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Mass Spectrometry and Instrumentation, East China University of

9

10

11

Technology, Nanchang 330013 People’s Republic of China



School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031 People’s Republic of China

§

Nanchang County the First Secondary School in Liantang, Nanchang 330046 P.R. China

12 13

*Corresponding

14

[email protected])

author

(Tel:

+86-0791-83969519;

Fax:

+86-0791-83969519;

15

16

17

18

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

E-mail:

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

19

Abstract: The molecular fingerprinting of intact fruit samples combined with

20

statistical data analysis can allow the assessment of fruit quality and location of origin.

21

Herein microwave plasma torch desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MPT-MS)

22

was applied to produce molecular fingerprints for the juice sac and exocarp of navel

23

oranges cultivated in three closely located habitats, and the mass spectrometric

24

fingerprints were differentiated by principal component analysis (PCA). Owing to the

25

relatively high temperature and high ionization efficiency of MPT, the volatile aroma

26

compounds and semi-volatile chemicals in the navel oranges were sensitively detected

27

and confidently identified by collision induced dissociation (CID). The limit of

28

detection (LOD) of MPT-MS for vanillin was 0.119 µg/L, with the relative standard

29

deviation (RSD, n=10) of 1.7%. The results showed that MPT-MS could be a

30

powerful analytical platform for the sensitive molecular analysis of fruits at molecular

31

level with high chemical specificity, allowing differentiation between the same sorts

32

grown in neighboring habitats.

33

Key words: Microwave plasma torch; Ambient Mass spectrometry; Desorption

34

ionization; Navel orange; Principal component analysis.

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 33

Page 3 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

35

Introduction

36

Navel orange is a common commodity of citrus containing more than 130

37

beneficial compounds with high nutritional and medicinal value to humans.1 Recent

38

studies have reported that sugars are mainly found in juice sac,1 and ketones, alkenes,

39

flavonoids, glycosides and other volatile flavor compounds are mostly contained in

40

the exocarp.2,3 Although the appearance of navel oranges from different habitats is

41

similar, the quality, nutrients and tastes could be significantly different due to the

42

difference in cultivation and planting environments, which are likely to cause the

43

molecular diversity of the active metabolites as well as the nutritional value of navel

44

oranges.

45

Currently, analytical methods such as infrared spectroscopy (IR),4,5 gas spectrometry

(GC-MS),6-8

46

chromatography-mass

47

chromatography

48

(LC-MS)12 are typically used for the quality inspection of navel oranges. These

49

methods have a high analytical power but usually require complicated and

50

time-consuming experimental procedures, which hinder high throughput sample

51

analysis. Powered by the advent of direct ionization techniques including but not

52

limited to desorption electrospray ionization (DESI),13 desorption atmospheric

53

pressure chemical ionization (DAPCI),14,15 extractive electrospray ionization (EESI)16

54

and internal extractive electrospray ionization (iEESI),17 direct analysis in real time

55

(DART),18 and microwave induced plasma (MIP),19 the speed and simplicity of mass

(HPLC),9-11

and

liquid

high

performance

chromatography-mass

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

liquid

spectrometry

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

56

spectrometric analysis have dramatically improved. In ambient MS, molecules that

57

are easily protonated/deprotonated can be sensitively detected by ambient ionization

58

techniques such as DESI, EESI and LAESI,20 which produces analyte ions in a way

59

similar to ESI. It was reported that compounds of weak polarity could be sensitively

60

detected by DAPCI,21 LTP22 and many other ionization methods based on ambient

61

corona discharge.23 However, the volatile fragrance compounds of navel oranges

62

produce similar MS fingerprints, and different kinds of navel oranges are difficult to

63

distinguish using a sensory method. Therefore, a technique with high desorption and

64

ionization energy would be of interest, since such a technique could provide rich

65

molecular information of the compounds which are unlikely to be detected by

66

commonly-available soft desorption ionization methods.

67

Microwave plasma torch (MPT),24 normally used as the excitation source for

68

optical emission spectrophotometry, was employed in analytical mass spectrometry as

69

the ionization source characterized by its relatively high temperature for easy

70

desorption and highly abundant ionic species for effective ionization. So far MPT-MS

71

has been applied to trace analysis of ambient samples in life sciences, food safety and

72

public security.25-27 In this study, MPT-MS was used to directly record the

73

characteristic MS fingerprints of the juice sac and exocarp of navel oranges. The MS

74

data were then subjected to principal component analysis (PCA),28 which resulted in

75

sensitive differentiation of navel oranges cultivated in three closely located habitats,

76

because MPT-MS provided rich molecular information of the compounds due to its

77

high desorption and ionization energy. 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 33

Page 5 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

78

Materials and Methods

79

Reagents and Materials. The microwave generator (WGY-20, 2450 MHz) and

80

microwave plasma torch tube were provided by Changchun Jilin Little Swan

81

Instruments Co. Ltd. (Changchun, China). Chemicals such as methanol (A.R. grade)

82

and standard substance such as 5-hydroxymethyl furfural, vanillin and 1-nonanol

83

were bought from Chinese Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ultra-purity

84

argon (> 99.99%) was purchased from Jiangxi Guoteng Gas Co. Ltd (Nanchang,

85

China).

86

Navel oranges (cv. 'Newhall') were collected from three closely located habitats,

87

which were geologically positioned within 3 kilometers in the naturally formed

88

farming valleys (namely Guoxi, Anxi and Fengxi) at Yongfeng Town, Xingguo

89

County, Jiangxi Province. The navel orange trees were 12 years old. The orchard

90

managements were under the same planting standard for navel oranges. And the navel

91

oranges located at the southern and upper part of the tree with similar sizes were

92

harvested on the same day. Prior to analysis, the dust on the orange surface was

93

washed off by distilled water at room temperature. The juice sac samples were cut

94

from randomly selected navel oranges, but a total of 72 exocarp samples were directly

95

sampled by the MPT around the maximal circle of the navel orange. For better

96

comparison, each piece of the juice sac (72 samples) was cut into 10×10×3mm3.

97

Experimental method. All the experiments were carried out using a LTQ-XL linear

98

Ion trap mass spectrometer (Finnigan, San Jose, CA) coupled with a microwave 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

99

plasma torch (Changchun Jilin University Little Swan Instruments Co., Ltd,

100

Changchun, China). A SC102 stepper motor (Beijing Optical Century Instrument Co.,

101

Ltd, Beijing, China) provided a mobile platform to hold the sample for analysis.

102

For MS analysis, the MPT device was slightly modified from the original

103

configuration for atomic emission spectrophotometry described elsewhere.29-32 The

104

vertical distance (h) between the sample surface and the plasma torch was 8 mm. The

105

angle (α) between of the microwave plasma torch and the sample surface was about

106

40°. The assembly of the MPT was carefully positioned to be coaxial with the ion

107

entrance capillary of the LTQ mass spectrometer, allowing a distance (d) of 10 mm

108

between the ion entrance and the MPT (Figure 1). The microwave power was 50 W.

109

The reflected microwave power was minimized to reach 0 W by adjusting the pipe

110

pistons of the microwave plasma torch. The flow rate of working gas (Ar) was 300

111

mL/min and the flow rate of the carrier gas (Ar) was 800 mL/min. The positive ion

112

detection mode was used to record the mass spectra, with the mass range of m/z

113

50-1000. The LTQ-XL instrument was operated under the following conditions: the

114

capillary temperature was 150 ℃, the capillary voltage was 16 V, the tube lens

115

voltage was 75 V, the maximum ion injection time was 100 ms. For collision induced

116

dissociation (CID) experiments, the mass-to-charge ratio window width of 1.2 Da was

117

used to isolate the precursor ions. The collision energy was 15~35%, and the collision

118

time was 30 ms. The rest of the parameters were automatically optimized by tuning

119

the LTQ-MS instrument.

5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 33

Page 7 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

120

Results and Discussion

121

MPT-MS analysis of navel orange juice sac samples. The MS fingerprints of juice

122

sac samples were directly recorded using MPT-MS under the experimental conditions.

123

Figure 2 shows the mass spectra of navel orange juice sac samples, with dominant

124

peaks at m/z 127, 144, 163, 180, 198 and small peaks such as m/z 289, 325 and 342.

125

Apparently, the abundance of these peaks varied along with the juice sac samples,

126

showing the correlation between the peaks and the habitats. The peak at m/z 127 was

127

tentatively assigned to protonated 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (5-HMF), 1 (Figure 3),

128

which was favorably produced via degradation of the hexose during the heat-assisted

129

desorption ionization process.33-36 Upon CID, the precursor ion (m/z 127) yielded

130

characteristic fragments of m/z 109 and m/z 81 in the MS/MS spectrum (Figure 4A),

131

probably by successive loss of H2O and CO. In the MS3 spectrum of m/z 127, the

132

fragment ion at m/z 81 was formed by the loss of H2O and CO. The fragmentation

133

pattern was in good agreement with that generated using authentic 5-HMF,

134

confirming that the m/z 127 peak was due to 5-HMF. Note that less 5-HMF is

135

normally found in normal navel orange tissue using ESI or low temperature ionization

136

techniques (e.g., DAPCI, DESI, EESI), thus the 5-HMF was likely formed through

137

the dehydration of hexose caused by extensive heating, due to the relatively high

138

temperature of the MPT. Therefore, the intensity levels of 5-HMF (m/z 127) served as

139

the indicator of hexose, which also fluctuated along with the quality/flavor of navel

140

oranges. In comparison with the previous study of metabolites in oranges (Citrus

141

sinensis),1 the abundant peak at m/z 180 was assigned to [glucosan+NH4] +. Similarly, 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

142

the assignment of peaks at m/z 145 [glucosan-OH] +, m/z 163 [glucosan+H] +, m/z 198

143

[hexose+NH4] +, m/z 289 [2glucosan-H2O-OH] +, m/z 325 [2glucosan+H] + and m/z

144

342 [2glucosan+NH4] + were also enhanced, suggesting that the navel oranges were

145

rich in sugar.1,37 However, the relative abundance of these peaks varied notably for

146

the navel orange samples from different habitats. Such differences in sugar levels

147

could partially account for the difference in flavors.

148

Following the strategy for analyte verification, 1-nonanol (MW 144), 2 (Figure

149

3), a natural product found in navel orange, bitter orange and many other plant

150

essential oils, was also confidently detected from navel orange juice sacs. Upon CID,

151

the protonated 1-nonanol (m/z 144) generated major fragments of m/z 126, 116, 115

152

and 98 (Figure 4B), by the loss of H2O, C2H4, C2H5 and C2H6O, respectively. In the

153

MS3 spectrum of m/z 144, the fragment ion at m/z 98 was formed by the loss of H2O

154

and C2H4. The CID fragmentation pattern was validated by using authentic 1-nonanol

155

under the same experimental conditions.

156

MPT-MS analysis of navel orange exocarp samples. MPT-MS was also applied for

157

the direct fingerprinting of navel orange sample pericarp/exocarp, which minimized

158

the potential damages to the fruit, so that the navel oranges could be normally traded

159

as usual. The mass spectrometric fingerprints of exocarp from Guoxi, Anxi and

160

Fengxi are shown in Figures 5A-C, respectively, in which the main peaks at m/z 153,

161

169, 186, 353 were detected in every spectrum. However, the relative abundance for

162

these peaks fluctuated considerably, according to the sample habitats. Apparently, the 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 33

Page 9 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

163

relative abundance of the peak at m/z 353 recorded from Fengxi navel oranges

164

(570,000 counts per second (cps)) was significantly higher than those either from

165

Guoxi (265,000 cps) or from Anxi (226,000 cps) navel Orange, making the Fengxi

166

oranges outstanding from the other two. Upon CID, the protonated citrunobin, 3(m/z

167

353) produced major fragments of m/z 338, 325 and 310, by the loss of (-CH3), CO

168

and (-CH3 + CO) (Figure 6A), respectively. In comparison with the previous study of

169

metabolites in oranges (Citrus sinensis) , the abundant peak at m/z 353 was assigned

170

to be protonated citrunobin,1,38 which is a major type of involatile chalcone (flavonoid)

171

of citrus.

172

Similarly, the ion of m/z 153 was assigned to protonated vanillin. Upon CID,

173

protonated vanillin cleaved H2O and CO to yield fragments of m/z 135 and m/z 125,

174

respectively, which was consistent with the MSn result of vanillin standard obtained

175

by MPT-MS. Since vanillin is a major flavor compound in orange fruits, it was

176

quantitatively determined by using the external standard method.39 As the result, the

177

relative standard deviation (RSD) for vanillin in exocarp was 1.7%, and the limit of

178

detection (LOD) was 0.119 µg/L. Quantitative analysis of the curve is y = 177.7x-

179

5158, R² = 0.998. The content order of vanillin for the navel oranges from these three

180

habitats is Guoxi > Fengxi > Anxi.

181

Jasmine lactone (MW 168) is a natural compound providing sweet, flowery and

182

fruity flavors. In our case, the peaks at m/z 169 and 186 were detected in the full-scan

183

mass spectra of exocarp samples (Figures 5A-C). Subjection of m/z 169 to CID 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

184

resulted in formation of m/z 151, 141, 127, 109 and 95 by the loss of (H2O), (CO),

185

(COCH2-), (-CH3COOH) and (-CH3CH2COOH), respectively, which had the

186

fragmentation pattern similar to that in the GC-MS analysis of jasmine lactone.40

187

According to previous reports,41,42 the peaks at m/z 169 and 186 were the signs of

188

jasmine lactone when analyzing gardenia and fruits of citrus. Thus, the detection of

189

the peak at m/z 186 (Figures 5A-C) also indicated the existence of jasmine lactone in

190

navel orange exocarp samples. Therefore, the peak at m/z 169 was tentatively

191

identified as protonated jasmine lactone. The peak at m/z 186 was probably the

192

protonated product of jasmine lactone after hydrolysis, 4 (Figure 3). During the CID

193

process, the precursor ion (m/z 186) generated peaks at m/z 168, 158, 144, 126 and

194

112 by the loss of (H2O), (CO), (COCH2-), (-CH3COOH) and (-CH3CH2COOH)

195

(Figure 6B), respectively. Note that the ion of m/z 186 and the MS2 ion of m/z 168

196

(Figure 6B insert) may have a fragmentation pattern similar to that of protonated

197

jasmine lactone (m/z 169), although the hydrolysis might affect the fragmentation

198

pattern of the lactone. The small peak at m/z 155 was ascribed to protonated nerol or

199

geraniol, which is widespread in Rutaceae.43,44

200

More interestingly, a group of peaks at m/z 343, 373, 403, 433 corresponding to

201

polymethoxyflavones (PMFs) appeared in the spectrum (Figure 5D) when the navel

202

orange exocarp was heated by MPT for more than 30 s. The detection of PMFs were

203

confirmed by comparing the multiple-stage tandem mass spectra (Table 1) with the

204

MSn results in previous studies.45,46 It was worthy noting that few peaks were detected

205

in the low mass range accompanying the PMFs, because the small analytes with low 9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 33

Page 11 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

206

mass-to-charge ratio were of high volatility and were almost evaporated before the

207

PMFs were desorbed by MPT. For reference, only a few peaks rather than the PMFs

208

at lower mass range were detected by DAPCI-MS,47 indicating that the heating

209

process facilitated by MPT was necessary for PMFs detection. More specifically, the

210

peaks at m/z 343, 373, 403, 433 corresponded to tetramethyl-o-scutellarein, 5,

211

sinensetin, 6, nobiletin, 7, and 3,5,6,7,8,3',4'-heptamethoxyflavone, 8 (Figure 3),

212

respectively.47 In the CID spectrum, their fragmentation patterns are consistent with

213

each other by the loss of 15, 30 and 61 Da, corresponding to (CH3-), (CH2O-) and

214

(2CH3O - H), respectively.47 Table 1 summarizes the CID data and signal intensity

215

levels of the PMFs. As shown in Table 1, the signal intensity levels of m/z 343, 403

216

and 433, which corresponded to 991,000 cps, 2,030,000 cps and 758,000 cps,

217

respectively, in Fengxi navel oranges were the highest among the three types of navel

218

oranges. For sinensetin (m/z 373), the signal intensity level in Fengxi navel oranges

219

was only slightly lower than that in Anxi. In general, the content of PMFs was rich in

220

Fengxi navel oranges. As the bioactive plant components in the orange peels, PMFs

221

can be used to inhibit the growth of a variety of cancer cells, mutant cells and to

222

reduce the oxygen stress of cells. Presumably, the higher content of PMFs in fruits

223

would bring more benefits to consumers. Therefore, as indicated in Table 1, level of

224

nobiletin was found to be highest in Fengxi navel oranges. The detection of PMFs

225

demonstrated that assisted by heating, MPT favored desorption/ionization of typical

226

non-volatile compounds embedded even deeply in plant tissue, which might not be

227

detectable using other ionization techniques such as DAPCI or DESI due to the lack 10

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

228

of heating for efficient desorption.

229

Visualization of the differences among navel oranges. The MS fingerprints of

230

navel orange juice sacs (Figure 2) and exocarp (Figure 5) showed notable differences

231

for the navel oranges cultivated in the three habitats. To easily visualize the

232

recognition, multivariate statistic tool, principal component analysis (PCA), was

233

employed to process the MS fingerprints data.48 For example, Figure 7A shows the

234

PCA score plots obtained using MPT-MS with 72 individual juice sac samples, in

235

which the samples collected from Fengxi were separated from those cultivated in

236

either Guoxi or Anxi habitat. The Anxi navel oranges were almost as uniformly

237

distributed in the 3-D PCA score plots as the Guoxi samples, showing that no

238

significant difference was detected by MPT-MS from the juice sac samples, although

239

the samples were cultivated in two habitats located in vicinity. The loading plots

240

shown in Figure 7B indicated that sugars were the major differential ingredients

241

among the navel oranges tested.

242

Similar to Figure 7A, the 72 navel oranges from Fengxi were clearly separated

243

from the rest of the samples (Figure 8A) when PCA was applied to processing the

244

MPT-MS fingerprints of navel orange exocarp samples. However, both the Guoxi

245

samples and Anxi samples were tightly clustered in Figure 8A, resulting in better

246

separation of the three types of navel orange samples. The improved differentiation

247

was achieved by the differential analytes, i.e., the major signals of citrunobin (m/z 353)

248

and hydrolysis product of jasmine lactone (m/z 186) in the loading plots (Figure 8B), 11

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 33

Page 13 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

249

which were quite different from those shown in Figure 7B. Overall, the exocarp

250

samples were better than the juice sacs samples for MPT-MS differential analysis of

251

navel oranges cultivated in closely located habitats, providing easy access, fast

252

analysis speed and satisfactory differentiation.

253

In conclusion, the volatile aroma compounds such as vanillin, and semi-volatile

254

chemicals such as sugars, alcohols, and anti-cancer flavonoids in the juice sacs and

255

exocarps of navel oranges were sensitively detected by microwave plasma torch

256

desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MPT-MS) followed by the statistical data

257

analysis. Fast recognition of the quality and origin of fruits produced in three closely

258

located habitats (Guoxi, Anxi and Fengxi) was successfully achieved. The

259

differentiation quality was notably improved by using MPT-MS data recorded from

260

navel orange exocarp samples rather than the juice sac samples. The data thus

261

demonstrates that MPT-MS is a sensitive analytical technique to reveal the differential

262

information at the molecular level without invasive sample manipulation and is a

263

promising method to allow distinction between the same types grown in neighboring

264

vicinities.

265

Acknowledgment

266

This work was supported by the National Key Scientific Instrument Development

267

Projects (2011YQ14015008), Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative

268

Research Team in University (PCSIRT) (No. IRT13054), International Science &

269

Technology Cooperation Program (No. 2015DFA40290). 12

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

270

Supporting Information

271

Tandem mass spectra of vanilln and jasmine lactone in the navel oranges by

272

MPT-MS. Tandem mass spectra of 5-HMF standard, 1-nonanol standard and vanillin

273

standard obtained by MPT-MS. Tandem mass spectra of the PMFs in the navel

274

oranges by MPT-MS. The RSD, LOD and the quantitative analysis curve of vanillin.

275

This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

276

Author Information

277

*Corresponding author (Tel: +86-0791-83896370; Fax: +86-0791-83896370; E-mail:

278

[email protected])

279

References

280

1.

281

orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) wild type and bud mutant fruits by direct analysis

282

in real-time and HPLC-electrospray mass spectrometry. Metabolomics 2014, 10,

283

508-523.

284

2.

285

Papageorgiou, V. P. Analysis of antioxidant compounds in sweet orange peel by

286

HPLC–diode array detection–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Biomed.

287

Chromatogr. 2005, 19, 138-148.

288

3.

Pan, Z. Y.; Li, Y.; Deng, X. X.; Xiao, S. Y. Non-targeted metabolomic analysis of

Anagnostopoulou, M. A.; Kefalas, P.; Kokkalou, E.; Assimopoulou, A. N.;

Dharmawan, J.; Barlow, P. J.; Curran, P. Characterisation of volatile compounds 13

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 33

Page 15 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

289

in selected citrus fruits from Asia. Dev. Food Sci. 2006, 43, 319-322.

290

4.

291

content in navel oranges using visible-near infrared spectroscopy and variable

292

selection methods. J. Innovative Opt. Health Sci. 2014, 7, 1350065.

293

5.

294

components in a Turkish cv. Dortyol (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) orange juice. J. Sci.

295

Food Agric. 2011, 91, 1855-1862.

296

6.

297

minimal processing of orange juice by automated data analysis of volatiles and

298

nonvolatile polar compounds determined by gas chromatography coupled to mass

299

spectrometry. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 1432-1440.

300

7.

301

off-flavour compounds in orange juice by on-line coupling of a pervaporation unit to

302

gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1047, 313-317.

303

8.

304

and bad condition by gas chromatography and gas chromatography-mass

305

spectrometry. Analyst 1992, 117, 721-725.

306

9.

307

analysis of amino acids in orange juice by HPLC–MS/MS for authenticity assessment.

Liu, Y. D.; Zhou, Y. R.; Pan, Y. Y. Online quantitative analysis of soluble solids

Kelebek, H.; Selli, S. Determination of volatile, phenolic, organic acid and sugar

Cerdán-Calero, M.; Izquierdo, L.; Halket, J. M.; Sentandreu, E. Evaluation of

Gómez-Ariza, J. L.; García-Barrera, T.; Lorenzo, F. Determination of flavour and

McCalley, D. V.; Torres-Grifol, J. F. Analysis of volatiles from oranges in good

Gómez-Ariza, J. L.; Villegas-Portero, M. J.; Bernal-Daza, V. Characterization and

14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

308

Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 540, 221-230.

309

10. Scherer, R.; Rybka, A. C. P.; Ballus, C. A.; Meinhart, A. D.; Teixeira Filho, J.;

310

Godoy, H. T. Validation of a HPLC method for simultaneous determination of main

311

organic acids in fruits and juices. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 150-154.

312

11. Camarda, L.; Di Stefano, V.; Del Bosco, S. F.; Schillaci, D. Antiproliferative

313

activity of citrus juices and HPLC evaluation of their flavonoid composition.

314

Fitoterapia 2007, 78, 426-429.

315

12. Hu, L.; Lei, S. R.; Guo, L. A. Determination: of citrus red 2 in navel orange by

316

ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Chin. J.

317

Chromatogr. 2012, 30, 832-835.

318

13. Takáts, Z.; Wiseman, J. M.; Gologan, B.; Cooks, R. G. Mass spectrometry

319

sampling under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization. Science

320

2004, 306, 471-473.

321

14. Chen, H. W.; Liang, H. Z.; Ding, J. H.; Lai, J. H.; Huan, Y. F.; Qiao, X. L. Rapid

322

differentiation of tea products by surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical

323

ionization mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 10093-10100.

324

15.

325

H.; Xiao, X. X. Differentiation of dried sea cucumber products from different

326

geographical areas by surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization

Wu, Z. C.; Chen, H. W.; Wang, W. L.; Jia, B.; Yang, T. L.; Zhao, Z.F.; Ding, J.

15

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 16 of 33

Page 17 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

327

mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 9356-9364.

328

16. Chen, H. W.; Yang, S. P.; Li, M.; Hu, B.; Li, J. Q.; Wang, J. Sensitive detection of

329

native proteins using extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Angew.

330

Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3053-3056.

331

17.

332

Direct characterization of bulk samples by internal extractive electrospray ionization

333

mass spectrometry.Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2495.

334

18.

335

analysis of materials in open air under ambient conditions. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77,

336

2297-2302.

337

19.

338

Zhou, M. G.; Duan, Y. X. Microwave-induced plasma desorption/ionization source for

339

ambient mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85,4512-4519.

340

20. Shrestha, B.; Nemes, P.; Nazarian, J.; Hathout, Y.; Hoffman, E. P.; Vertes, A.

341

Direct analysis of lipids and small metabolites in mouse brain tissue by AP

342

IR-MALDI and reactive LAESI mass spectrometry. Analyst 2010, 135, 751-758.

343

21. Huang, X. Y.; Guo, X. L.; Luo, H. L.; Fang, X. W.; Zhu, T. G.; Zhang, X. L.;

344

Chen, H. W.; Luo, L. P. Fast differential analysis of propolis using surface desorption

345

atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Int. J. Anal. Chem.

Zhang, H.; Gu, H. W.; Yan, F. Y.; Wang, N. N.; Wei, Y. P.; Xu, J. J.; Chen, H. W.

Cody, R. B.; Laramée, J. A.; Durst, H. D. Versatile new ion source for the

Zhan, X. F.; Zhao, Z. J.; Yuan, X.; Wang, Q. H.; Li, D. D.; Xie, H.; Li, X. M.;

16

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

346

2015, 2015, 176475.

347

22. Garcia-reyes, J. F.; Harper, J. D.; Salazar, G. A.; Charipar, N. A.; Ouyang, Z.;

348

Cooks, R. G. Detection of explosives and related compounds by low-temperature

349

plasma ambient ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2010, 83, 1084-1092.

350

23 Yu, Z.; Chen, L. C.; Suzuki, H.; Ariyada, O.; Erra-Balsells, R.; Nonami, H.;

351

Hiraoka, K. Direct profiling of phytochemicals in tulip tissues and in vivo monitoring

352

of the change of carbohydrate content in tulip bulbs by probe electrospray ionization

353

mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 20, 2304-2311.

354

24. Jin, Q. H.; Zhu, C.; Borer, M. W.; Hieftje, G. M. A microwave plasma torch

355

assembly for atomic emission spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 1991, 46,

356

417-430.

357

25. Wan, T. Q.; Yu, D. D.; Zhang, T. Q.; Zhang, X. W.; Zhou, J. G. A rapid method for

358

detection of gunshot residue using microwave plasma torch-mass spectrometry.

359

Procedia Eng. 2010, 7, 22-27.

360

26. Zhang, T. Q.; Zhou, W.; Jin, W.; Zhou, J. G.; Handberg, E.; Zhu, Z. Q.; Huan, W.

361

C.; Jin, Q. H. Direct desorption/ionization of analytes by microwave plasma torch for

362

ambient mass spectrometric analysis. J. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 48, 669-676.

363

27. Li, Y.; Yang, M. L.; Sun, R.; Zhong, T.; Chen, H. W. Detection of uranium in

364

industrial and mines samples by microwave plasma torch mass spectrometry. J. Mass

17

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 33

Page 19 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

365

Spectrom. 2016, 51, 159-164.

366

28. Zhu, L.; Yan, J. P.; Zhu, Z. Q.; Ouyang, Y. Z.; Zhang, X. L.; Zhang, W. J.; Dai, X.

367

M.; Luo, L. P.; Chen, H. W. Differential analysis of camphor wood products by

368

desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. J. Agric.

369

Food Chem. 2013, 61, 547-552.

370

29. Duan, Y. X.; Du, X. G.; Jin, Q. H. Comparative studies of surfatron and

371

microwave plasma torch sources for determination of mercury by atomic emission

372

spectrometry. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1994, 9, 629-633.

373

30. Yang, W. J.; Zhang, H. Q.; Yu, A. M.; Jin, Q. H. Microwave plasma torch

374

analytical atomic spectrometry. Microchem. J. 2000, 66, 147-170.

375

31. Liang, F.; Zhang, D. I.; Lei, Y. H.; Zhang, H. Q.; Jin, Q. H. Determination of

376

selected noble metals by MPT-AES using a pneumatic nebulizer. Microchem. J. 1995,

377

52, 181-187.

378

32. Gong, Z.; Chan, W. F.; Wang, X.; Lee, F. S.-C. Determination of arsenic and

379

antimony by microwave plasma atomic emission spectrometry coupled with hydride

380

generation and a PTFE membrane separator. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 450, 207-214.

381

33. Rajchl, A.; Drgová, L.; Grégrová, A.; Čížková, H.; Ševčík, R.; Voldřich, M. Rapid

382

determination of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by DART ionization with time-of-flight

383

mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 4737-4745.

18

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

384

34. Zakrzewska, M. E.; Bogel-Łukasik, E.; Bogel-Łukasik, R. Ionic liquid-mediated

385

formation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural-A promising biomass-derived building block.

386

Chem. Rev. 2010, 111, 397-417.

387

35. Román-Leshkov, Y.; Chheda, J. N.; Dumesic, J. A. Phase modifiers promote

388

efficient production of hydroxymethylfurfural from fructose. Science, 2006, 312,

389

1933-1937.

390

36. Chheda, J. N.; Román-Leshkov, Y.; Dumesic, J. A. Production of

391

5-hydroxymethylfurfural and furfural by dehydration of biomass-derived mono-and

392

poly-saccharides. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 342-350.

393

37. Chernetsova, E. S.; Morlock, G. E. Assessing the capabilities of direct analysis in

394

real time mass spectrometry for 5-hydroxymethylfurfural quantitation in honey. Int. J.

395

Mass Spectrom. 2012, 314, 22-32.

396

38. Wu, T. S. Flavonoids from root bark of Citrus sinensis and C.nobilis.

397

Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 3558-3560.

398

39.

399

a freshly reconstituted orange juice from concentrate. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2009,

400

229, 611-622.

401

40. Casilli, A.; Decorzant, E.; Jaquier, A.; Delort, E. Multidimensional gas

402

chromatography hyphenated to mass spectrometry and olfactometry for the volatile

Averbeck, M.; Schieberle, P. H. Characterisation of the key aroma compounds in

19

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 33

Page 21 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

403

analysis of citrus hybrid peel extract, J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1373, 169-178.

404

41. Liang, H. Z.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S. X.; Shao, Z. Corona discharge atmospheric

405

pressure ionization mass spectrometry for real time gas analysis, Chinese J. Anal.

406

Chem. 2008, 36, 1152-1156.

407

42. Delort, E.; Casilli, A.; Decorzant, E.; Jaquier, A. Identification of new volatile

408

compounds in the Citrus Hybrid Mandarinquat ‘Indio’, Acta Hortic. 2015, 1065,

409

293-303.

410

43.

411

M. Anti-inflammatory, insecticidal and antimicrobial activities and chemical

412

composition of the essential oils of different plant organs from navel orange (Citrus

413

sinensis L.) Osbeck var. Malesy) grown in Egypt. J. Med. Plants Res. 2013, 7,

414

1204-1215.

415

44. Kelebek, H.; Selli, S. Determination of volatile, phenolic, organic acid and sugar

416

components in a Turkish cv. Dortyol (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) orange juice. J. Sci.

417

Food Agric. 2011, 91, 1855-1862.

418

45. Winkel-Shirley, B. It takes a garden. how work on diverse plant species has

419

contributed to an understanding of flavonoid metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127,

420

1399-1404.

421

46. Ye, X. L.; Cao, D.; Zhao, X.; Song, F. Y.; Huang, Q. H.; Fan, G. R.; Wu, F. H.

Hamdan, D. I.; Mohamed, M. E.; Abdulla, R. H.; Mohamed, S. M.; El-Shazly, A.

20

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

422

Chemical fingerprint and metabolic profile analysis of Citrus reticulate 'Chachi'

423

decoction by HPLC-PDA-IT-MS n and HPLC-Quadrupole-Orbitrap-MS method. J.

424

Chromatogr. B 2014, 970, 108-120.

425

47. Fang, X. W.; Zhong, T.; Yao, G. C.; Gao, X.; Yang, M. L.; Li, H.; Le, Z. G.; Zhang,

426

X. L. Comparison of ambient temperature and thermal surface desorption atmospheric

427

pressure chemical ionization mass spectra for the pericarp of navel orange, Chin. J.

428

Appl. Chem. 2015, 32, 1201-1207

429

48. Chen, H. W.; Sun, Y. P.; Wortmann, A.; Gu, H. W.; Zenobi, R. Differentiation of

430

maturity and quality of fruit using noninvasive extractive electrospray ionization

431

quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 1447-1455.

432

433

434

435

436

437

438

439 21

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 33

Page 23 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

440

Figure Captions

441

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of microwave plasma torch mass spectrometry for

442

navel orange analysis.

443

Figure 2. Fingerprint spectra of navel orange juice sac from three origins. (A) Guoxi;

444

(B) Anxi; (C) Fengxi.

445

Figure 3. Chemical structures of 5-hydroxymethyl furfural, 1, 1-nonanol, 2, citrunobin,

446

3, hydrolysis product of jasmine lactone, 4, tetramethyl-O-scutellarein, 5, sinensetin, 6,

447

nobiletin, 7, 3,5,6,7,8,3',4'-heptamethoxyflavone, 8.

448

Figure 4. MSn spectra of main substances of navel orange. (A) 5-HMF (insert: MS3

449

spectrum of m/z 127); (B) 1-nonanol (insert: MS3 spectrum of m/z 144).

450

Figure 5. Fingerprint spectra of navel orange exocarp from three habitats. (A) Guoxi;

451

(B) Anxi; (C) Fengxi; (D) Fengxi exocarp heated for more than 30 s.

452

Figure 6. MS2 spectra of main substance of navel orange. (A) Citrunobin (insert: MS3

453

spectrum of m/z 353); (B) Hydrolysis product of jasmine lactone (insert: MS3

454

spectrum of m/z 186).

455

Figure 7. PCA score results of navel orange juice sac composition. (A) 3D-PCA score

456

plot; (B) PCA loading plots.

457

Figure 8. PCA score results of navel orange exocarp composition. (A) 3D-PCA score

458

plot; (B) PCA loading plots 22

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 24 of 33

Table Table 1. The Polymethoxyflavones Fragments and Signal Intensity Levels of Navel Orange Exocarp Samples Structure

Intensity

Main Name

m/z

number

fragments

Guoxi

Anxi

Fengxi

964,000

935,000

991,000

1,500,000

1,840,000

1,830,000

1,500,000

1,860,000

2,030,000

528,000

696,000

758,000

4,490,000

5,330,000

5,600,000

328, 313, 5

tetramethyl-O-scutellarein

343 299, 282 358, 343,

6

sinensetin

373 329, 312 388, 373,

7

nobiletin

403

355, 342, 327 418, 403,

3,5,6,7,8,3',4'433

8

385, 372,

heptamethoxyflavone 342 Total ——

——

——

/intensity

23

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 25 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure graphics Figure 1

24

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 2

25

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 26 of 33

Page 27 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 3

26

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 4

27

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 28 of 33

Page 29 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 5

28

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 6

29

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 30 of 33

Page 31 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 7

30

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 8

31

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 32 of 33

Page 33 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Table of Contents Graphic

32

ACS Paragon Plus Environment