Subscriber access provided by Binghamton University | Libraries
Article
Impact of surface charge on cerium oxide nanoparticle uptake and translocation by wheat (Triticum aestivum) Eleanor Spielman-Sun, Enzo Lombi, Erica Donner, Daryl L Howard, Jason M Unrine, and Gregory V. Lowry Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 02 Jun 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 2, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Impact of surface charge on cerium oxide nanoparticle uptake and
2
translocation by wheat (Triticum aestivum)
3 4
Eleanor Spielman-Sun§, Enzo Lombi‡, Erica Donner‡, Daryl Howard⊥,
5
Jason M. Unrine˟, Gregory V. Lowry*§
6 7
§
8 9 10
Civil & Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
‡
Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, 5095, Australia
11
⊥Australian
12
˟ University of Kentucky, Department of Soil and Plant Science, Lexington, Kentucky 40546,
13
Synchrotron, Clayton, Victoria, 3168 Australia
United States
14 15 16
*Corresponding author:
17
Address: Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
18
Phone: (412) 268-2948
19
Fax: (412) 268-7813
20
Email: glowry@cmu.edu
21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 1
Environmental Science & Technology
22
Page 2 of 30
TOC ART
23 24 25
ABSTRACT
26
Nanoparticle (NP) physiochemical properties, including surface charge, affect cellular uptake,
27
translocation, and tissue localization. To evaluate the influence of surface charge on NP uptake
28
by plants, wheat seedlings were hydroponically exposed to 20 mg/L of ~4nm CeO2 NPs
29
functionalized with positively charged, negatively charged, and neutral dextran coatings. Fresh,
30
hydrated roots and leaves were analyzed at various time points over 34h using fluorescence X-
31
ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy to provide laterally resolved spatial distribution and
32
speciation of Ce. A 15-20% reduction from Ce(IV) to Ce(III) was observed in both roots and
33
leaves, independent of NP surface charge. Due to its higher affinity with negatively charged cell
34
walls, CeO2(+) NPs adhered to the plant roots the strongest. After 34h, CeO2(-) and CeO2(0) NP
35
exposed plants had higher Ce leaf concentrations than the plants exposed to CeO2(+) NPs. While
36
Ce was found mostly in the leaf veins of the CeO2(-) NP exposed plant, Ce was found in clusters
37
in the non-vascular leaf tissue of the CeO2(0) NP exposed plant. These results provide important
38
information for understanding mechanisms responsible for plant uptake, transformation, and
39
translocation of NPs, and suggest that NP coatings can be designed to target NPs to specific parts
40
of plants.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2
Page 3 of 30
41
Environmental Science & Technology
INTRODUCTION
42
Nanotechnology has the potential to play a critical role in global food production.1–5 The
43
unique properties of nanoparticles (NPs) can be harnessed for developing formulations that
44
contain nanoscale active ingredients designed for direct use on agricultural soils or crops. These
45
products have the capacity to reduce the energy and water inputs for food production by
46
providing a more targeted and efficient delivery system for fertilizers and pesticides. However,
47
properly utilizing the characteristics of these nanoparticles, such as particle size, coating,
48
chemical composition, and shape, requires an understanding of the factors influencing the
49
fundamental interactions between plant tissues and engineered NPs.
50
Several hydroponic studies have investigated the accumulation and translocation of bare
51
cerium dioxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) in plants.6–19 Most of these studies demonstrated a
52
dose-dependent increase of cerium (Ce) in the roots of various plant species and limited
53
translocation of Ce to the shoots. There are a few studies that have specifically documented the
54
speciation and transformation of CeO2 NPs in plant tissue. Hernandez-Viezcas et al. grew
55
soybean in soil amended with 1000 mg/L CeO2 NPs and used Micro X-Ray Fluorescence (μ-
56
XRF) and X-Ray Absorption Near Edge Structure (XANES) spectroscopy to determine that
57
while most of the Ce(IV) remained untransformed in the plant, there was a small percentage of
58
Ce(III) in the pod.20 Zhang et al. used XANES and Scanning Transmission X-ray Microscopy
59
(STXM) analysis and found accumulation in cucumber of both CeO2 NPs and Ce(III) as cerium
60
phosphate in roots and as cerium carboxylates in shoots.14 Similar dissolution and transformation
61
of CeO2 NPs has been observed in hydroponically grown wheat, pumpkins and sunflowers8 as
62
well as in soil cultivated corn.21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 4 of 30
63
Surface charge is a key property that can control NP transport in environmental and
64
biological systems. Zhu et al. compared the uptake of functionalized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs)
65
with well-defined surface charges into various terrestrial plants, including radish, ryegrass, rice,
66
and pumpkin, and confirmed that while positively-charged NPs more readily attach to plant
67
roots, negatively-charged NPs are most efficiently translocated into the plant roots.22 The same
68
trend has been observed for AuNPs coated with variously charged organic ligands on rice and
69
tomato23 and for cationic or anionic coated CdSe/ CdSnS quantum dots on poplar trees.24 There
70
are a few studies focused on surface charge dependent CeO2 NP plant uptake, including Zhao et
71
al. who exposed corn to alginate coated CeO2 NPs21 and Barrios et al. who exposed tomato to
72
citric acid coated CeO2 NPs.25 However these studies focus more on the effects of uptake with
73
and without coating, and less on the translocation and spatial distribution of Ce in the plant. Here
74
we studied NP surface charge in a well-controlled hydroponic system to gain a better
75
understanding of the influence of surface charge on NP uptake, transformation, and translocation
76
to leaves, and tissue localization in wheat plants.
77
In situ imaging of metal distribution in hydrated biological systems can provide mechanistic
78
details of plant uptake and translocation, but is challenging because target metal concentrations
79
are low (mg/kg dry plant tissue) and element speciation and distribution can be altered during
80
sample preparation (including drying, embedding, and staining) as well as by the analytical
81
process itself (e.g. X-ray beam damage).26,27 Furthermore, in the case of most biological samples,
82
the highly hydrated nature of the specimens is not compatible with most major analytical
83
techniques operating under vacuum such as TEM and non-environmental SEM. However,
84
advances in synchrotron-based techniques now allow the in situ examination of metals and
85
metalloids in hydrated and fresh plant tissues at low metal concentrations.28–30 In this
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4
Page 5 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
86
experiment, we obtained spatially resolved 2D maps of metal speciation in plant samples by
87
XANES mapping, i.e. scanning the same area repeatedly with decreasing energies across an
88
absorption edge, thus collecting a XANES spectra for each pixel of an entire image.31,32 This
89
approach differs from other studies where a μ-XRF map is obtained and μ-XANES spectra are
90
then collected from specific regions of interest within that map, or where XANES is performed
91
on the bulk, freeze-dried tissue.26,28–30,33 XANES mapping has the advantage of providing more
92
detailed information on speciation distribution for the entire sample. This technique has
93
previously been performed on plant tissues by Wang et al. to compare selenate and selenite
94
exposed wheat and rice plants32, Kopittke et al. to compare arsenate and arsenite exposed wheat
95
and rice plants, 34 and De Brier et al. to study iron speciation in mature wheat grains.35
96
The main goals of the present study were to evaluate the influence of surface charge on
97
CeO2 NP uptake, distribution, and speciation in a model plant, specifically wheat (Triticum
98
aestivum), and elucidate details about the reduction of Ce(IV) to Ce(III) in the different plant
99
compartments. CeO2 NPs were chosen as a model NP because they are easy to synthesize in a
100
narrow size distribution, to coat with various charges, and to disperse in aqueous solution;
101
cerium also has a low background level in plants. We used fluorescence-XANES imaging to
102
investigate the in situ laterally resolved speciation of Ce within fresh wheat roots and leaves with
103
the overarching goal of gaining a better understanding of how NPs can be engineered to increase
104
translocation and to target specific parts of plants through functionalization.
105 106
MATERIALS AND METHODS
107
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 6 of 30
108
CeO2 Nanoparticles. Cerium dioxide NPs with three different charges were synthesized as
109
reported previously in Collin et al.36 Briefly, uncharged dextran coated CeO2 NPs (CeO2 NP (0))
110
with a nominal 4 nm primary particle diameter were produced via alkaline precipitation from a
111
solution of cerium chloride salt and dextran. This coating was then further functionalized, either
112
with diethylaminoethyl groups to create a net positive charge (CeO2 (+)) or with carboxymethyl
113
groups to create a net negative charge (CeO2 (-)). The particles were diluted to 20 mg/L as Ce in
114
the exposure medium (¼ strength Hoagland’s) and probe sonicated (550 Sonic Dismembrator,
115
Fisher Scientific) for 1 min at 10 s intervals to ensure dispersion. The hydrodynamic diameter
116
and electrophoretic mobility of the NPs in the exposure medium (20 mg/L as Ce in ¼ strength
117
Hoagland’s) were measured using a Nano Zetasizer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern). The initial
118
pH and ionic strength of the exposure medium were 5.6 and 5.2 mM, respectively, and these
119
were not further adjusted. The apparent zeta potential was calculated from the electrophoretic
120
mobility using the Hückel approximation. NP dosing concentrations were selected to avoid acute
121
toxicity while ensuring adequate signal for µ-XRF imaging.
122 123
Plant Growth: For µ-XRF, wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. shield) seeds were surface sterilized
124
with 10% w/v bleach (VWR Analytical) for 10 min and then thoroughly rinsed with DI water.
125
The sterilized seeds were germinated on deionized water-moistened filter paper in a Petri dish.
126
After four days, the seedlings were transferred to 100-mL plastic containers. Each container was
127
filled with 80 mL of ¼ strength Hoagland’s medium37 and covered with a plastic lid with five
128
holes. Five seedlings were transplanted to five of the holes with the roots suspended in a
129
continuously aerated solution. Plants were grown at 25 °C under alternating conditions of 12 h of
130
light and 12 h of dark. Nutrient solution was renewed every 3 days. After 7 days, the plants were
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6
Page 7 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
131
transferred from the University of South Australia (Adelaide, Australia) to the Australian
132
Synchrotron (Melbourne, Australia) where the plants were hydroponically exposed to 20 mg-
133
Ce/L of CeO2 NPs. Plant tissue was removed at 1 h, 8 h, and 34 h to analyze by µ-XRF.
134
Total Ce determination experiments were conducted at Carnegie Mellon University
135
(Pittsburgh, PA). Plant growth conditions were replicated to match those used for the
136
synchrotron experiment. At the various time points, plants were harvested in triplicate and roots
137
and shoots separated for determination of fresh and dry mass. Briefly, dried plant tissue samples
138
were digested overnight at room temperature in a 2:1 ratio of concentrated HNO3 and 30% H2O2,
139
then heated to 100 °C for 30 minutes (protocol adapted from EPA Method 3050b38). Following
140
digestion, the samples were diluted to 5% HNO3 using deionized water before analysis using
141
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Agilent 7700x, Santa Clara, CA).
142
Further details are provided in the supporting information.
143 144
µ-XRF and Fluorescence XANES Imaging: Following exposure, roots were rinsed in a Ce free
145
hydroponic solution and placed between two pieces of 4 µm-thick Ultralene, which formed a seal
146
around the plant tissue to minimize dehydration. For each exposure solution, two replicate roots
147
were examined, with all roots positioned vertically in the sample holder and scanned
148
simultaneously. The tips and bases of the plant leaves were scanned separately due to the size of
149
the sample mount. Samples were prepared and examined at the XFM beamline at the Australian
150
Synchrotron, where an in-vacuum undulator is used to produce an X-ray beam. A Si(111)
151
monochromator and Kirkpatrick-Baez (KB) mirror microprobe are used to obtain a
152
monochromatic beam focused onto the specimen. The X-ray fluorescence emitted by the
153
specimen was collected using the 384-element Maia detector (Rev C) placed in a backscatter
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 8 of 30
154
geometry.39,40 For all scans, samples were analyzed continuously “on-the-fly” in the horizontal
155
direction.
156
An initial large area survey scan at 15.8 keV was conducted to identify the area of interest
157
and obtain overall elemental distributions. Step sizes and scanning velocities were adjusted so
158
each scan took around 2 h. Details are provided in the supporting information. Subsequently, a
159
smaller area was chosen to conduct fluorescence XANES imaging with the XANES stack itself
160
consisting of 108 individual maps at decreasing energies across the Ce LIII edge. Details
161
regarding the energy steps are provided in the supporting information.
162
The three nanoparticle types as standards were also analyzed as suspensions using
163
fluorescence-XANES imaging. All standards were prepared to a final Ce concentration of 20
164
mg/L. Further details about the preparation and imaging of these standards are provided in the
165
supporting information. These XANES spectra and that of Ce(III) acetate, which was used as the
166
model compound for Ce(III), are presented in the supporting information (Figure S1). The large
167
peak at 5727 eV is a characteristic peak of the Ce(III) oxidation state; the two peaks at 5730 and
168
5737 eV are characteristic of Ce(IV). These spectral differences are an important criterion for
169
distinguishing Ce compounds of the two different oxidation states.
170
µ-XRF spectra were analyzed using GeoPIXE.31 For the fluorescence-XANES stacks, the
171
GeoPIXE “energy association” module was used to compare the ‘concentration’ ratios between
172
two energies: 5,727 and 5,737 eV, which are the white lines for Ce(III) and Ce(IV) respectively.
173
Because pixels were generally parallel to the 1:1 line, particularly at the highest Ce
174
concentrations, selected pixel populations represented absolute changes in Ce(III) and Ce(IV)
175
concentration. (See Figures S3, S5-6 in supporting information for more details). From the
176
selected pixel populations, XANES spectra were extracted, background subtracted, and
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8
Page 9 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
177
normalized using SIXPack (Version 1.4).41 Linear combination fitting (LCF) was performed
178
using the collected CeO2 NP standards above and a Ce(III) acetate spectrum from Auffan et al.42
179
Because the exact oxidation state of CeO2 NPs is difficult to characterize,43 we assume for the
180
purposing of fitting that the starting materials are all Ce(IV) oxidation state.
181 182
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
183 184
Characterization of CeO2 NPs: NPs have been previously characterized by TEM, FTIR and
185
XRD by Collin et al.36 TEM indicated the CeO2 core of the particles was ~4 nm. Additional
186
characterization of the particles at 20 mg/L as Ce in the nutrient solution was performed as
187
follows. The number weighted average hydrodynamic diameter of the particles in the exposure
188
medium were 12.0 ± 3.4, 19.4 ± 5.7, and 14.5 ± 3.3 nm, for the CeO2(+), CeO2(0), and CeO2(-)
189
particles, respectively. The electrophoretic mobility of the particles in the nutrient solution were
190
1.15 ± 0.30, -0.02 ± 0.21, and -1.59 ± 0.41 µm·cm·V-1·s-1 for the CeO2(+), CeO2(0), and CeO2(-)
191
particles respectively. At pH of 5.6 and an ionic strength of 5.2 mM, this corresponds to an
192
apparent zeta potential of +22.0 ± 6.1 mV, -0.5 ± 3.9 mV, and -30.3 ± 6.6 mV, for the CeO2(+),
193
CeO2(0), and CeO2(-) particles respectively. The particles were stable in the exposure medium;
194
less than 0.1 % dissolution was observed over 34 hours (Table S1); organic acid root exudates
195
induced a small shift in the measured hydrodynamic diameter for all three particle types, but no
196
significant difference in the aggregation behavior for the three particle types was observed
197
(Figure S2).
198
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 10 of 30
199
Total Ce Association/Uptake in Roots and Shoots: The surface charge of the CeO2 NPs had a
200
substantial impact on the accumulation and translocation of Ce. The Ce concentrations
201
associated with the wheat roots and shoots from the three different treatments are shown in
202
Figure 1. These values include all Ce that was associated with the plant roots (internal and
203
external) after collection and rinsing in NP-free Hoagland’s medium. As exposure time
204
increased, total Ce uptake increased for all NP types in both the roots and shoots. The majority of
205
the plant-associated Ce was sorbed on/in the roots rather than in the shoots, irrespective of the
206
charge of the NPs (note the 1000-fold higher concentrations in the roots compared to the shoots
207
in Figure 1). Du et al.44 and Rico et al.45 observed significantly less uptake of CeO2 NPs in their
208
soil exposures with wheat, which is a common difference between hydroponic and soil
209
exposures.46 Unlike our study, Schwabe et al. observed no translocation of CeO2 NPs in
210
hydroponic wheat,8 though this is likely attributed to NP size differences. Numerous studies have
211
demonstrated that smaller NPs are more likely to be internalized by plants than larger ones.47,48
212
The smallest CeO2 NPs used by Schwabe et al. were 9 nm by TEM, which is more than twice the
213
diameter of the particles used in this study. Thus we attribute the observed differences to a NP
214
size effect.
215
With regards to surface charge,, there was an overall greater mass of the positively charged
216
NPs associated with the roots than the neutral or negatively charged NPs, which is consistent
217
with other studies comparing the impact of surface charge on NP uptake by plants.22–24,49 This
218
difference in association between the differently charged particles is likely due to electrostatic
219
interactions between the charged particles and the root surface. It is well established that plant
220
cell walls, including epidermal cells on the root surface, are negatively charged because of the
221
abundance of polysaccharides containing galacturonic acid residues.50,51 Thus, CeO2(+) NPs
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10
Page 11 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
222
accumulated on the root surface due to electrostatic attraction between the positively charged NP
223
and the negatively charged root surface, while CeO2(-) NPs accumulated the least due to
224
electrostatic repulsions. The uncharged particles had an intermediate degree of interaction
225
(possibly limited by steric impediment). While the negatively charged and neutral particles had
226
the lowest accumulation in/on the roots, these NPs were still able to overcome this electrostatic
227
and/or electrosteric repulsion by forming strong hydrogen or covalent bonds with the root
228
surface, through polyvalent cation bridging, or by diffusing into the mucilage.52 This distribution
229
was confirmed with Ce maps on the wheat plant roots (Figure 2). Sufficient Ce was present on
230
the roots exposed to negative and neutral NPs for 1h to allow elemental mapping; the neutral
231
particles showed some regions of concentrated Ce, likely from particle adhesion (Figure 2).
232
Overall, the leaves contained less than 1% of the total plant associated Ce, indicating that very
233
little of the adhered Ce was translocated from the roots to the shoots. While there was no
234
statistically significant difference in Ce accumulation in the leaves for each treatment after 8 h,
235
by 34 h the CeO2(-) and CeO2(0) NP exposed plants had accumulated significantly more Ce in
236
the leaves than the CeO2(+) NP exposed plants. This is particularly noteworthy since both had
237
accumulated significantly less Ce on/in the roots than the CeO2(+) NP exposed plants.
238
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11
Environmental Science & Technology
239
Page 12 of 30
Figure 1. Total Ce concentrations in dried wheat plant roots (bottom) and leaves (top) after 1 h, 8 h, and 34 h. Note different scales for the roots and leaves. Total Ce uptake in the leaves after 1 h of exposure was not measured. Significant differences (based on ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc tests (p