Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF LOUISIANA
Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions
L-Arginine protects ovine intestinal epithelial cells from lipopolysaccharides-induced apoptosis through alleviating oxidative stress Hao Zhang, Along Peng, Yin Yu, Shuang Guo, Mengzhi Wang, and Hongrong Wang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06739 • Publication Date (Web): 27 Jan 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 27, 2019
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
L-Arginine protects ovine intestinal epithelial cells from lipopolysaccharides-induced apoptosis through alleviating oxidative stress Hao Zhang,†,‡ Along Peng,†,‡ Yin Yu,†,‡ Shuang Guo,†,‡ Mengzhi Wang,†,‡ and Hongrong Wang*,†,‡ †Laboratory
of Metabolic Manipulation of Herbivorous Animal Nutrition,
College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, P. R. China ‡Joint
International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety,
the Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, P. R. China.
*Address correspondence to HR-W (e-mail:
[email protected]).
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
ABSTRACT: This research aims to explore the effect of l-arginine ( Arg ) upon
2
lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-induced induction of the oxidative stress as well as
3
subsequent apoptosis within ovine intestinal epithelial cells (IOECs). Through a 16 h
4
incubation, cells were divided into four groups and the medium was replaced with
5
different medium as follows: (1) Control (Con), Arg-free Dulbecco’s modified
6
Eagle’s F12 Ham medium (DMEM); (2) Arg treatment, Arg-free DMEM
7
supplemented with 100 µM Arg; (3) LPS treatment, Arg-free DMEM supplemented
8
with 10 µg/mL LPS; (4) LPS with Arg treatment, Arg-free DMEM supplemented
9
with both 10 µg/mL LPS and 100 µM Arg. After culturing for 24 hours in different
10
mediums, some characteristics of cells in the four groups were measured. Addition of
11
Arg increased cell viability induced with LPS compared with LPS group (p < 0.05).
12
Arg significantly decreased the release of dehydrogenase (LDH) and the production
13
of malonaldehyde (MDA) (p < 0.05) within IOECs challenged by the LPS. Compared
14
with the LPS group, cells treated with Arg and Arg + LPS increased (p < 0.05)
15
mRNA as well as protein expression of glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx1), catalase
16
(CAT), superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2), B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2), quinone
17
oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), heme oxygenase (HO-1), and nuclear factor erythroid
18
2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). IOEC treatment with Arg reduced significantly (p < 0.05)
19
apoptosis induced by the LPS (12.58 ± 0.79 %). The results showed that Arg
20
promoted the protein expression of Nrf2, up-regulated expression of the phase II
21
metabolizing enzymes (NQO1 and HO-1) as well as anti-oxidative enzymes (GPx1,
22
CAT and SOD2) for alleviating oxidative injury, and protect IOECs from 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 34
Page 3 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
23
LPS-induced apoptosis.
24
KEYWORDS:
25
lipopolysaccharides
26
INTRODUCTION
27
Formed by one constant monolayer of differentiating and proliferating intestinal
28
epithelial cells (IECs), intestinal mucosa epithelium is one basis barrier which is the
29
first defense line of human body for protecting against external environment.1
30
Intestinal homeostasis is kept by dynamic, and rigorously regulated epithelial cell
31
migration and proliferation.2 However, oxidative stress might damage intestinal
32
barrier,3 leading to one increased permeation of allergens as well as toxins.
33
Considered as one imbalance state between antioxidant defense and reactive oxygen
34
species (ROS) production, oxidative stress is capable of inducing apoptosis within in
35
vivo and in vitro experiments.3-5 Normal cells have various mechanisms of defense,
36
which include but are not limited to enzymatic antioxidant systems like glutathione
37
peroxidase (GSH-Px), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD), and
38
non-enzymatic antioxidant systems.6,7 It has been shown that lipopolysaccharides
39
(LPS), which is one main integral component of gram-negative bacteria outer
40
membrane, increased oxidative injury by generating lots of ROS, which could result
41
in apoptosis and lipid peroxidation.8 The current research utilized LPS for establishing
42
one cell injury model, in order to investigate the protective effect of l-arginine(Arg)
43
upon ovine intestinal epithelial cells (IOECs).
44
l-arginine,
apoptosis,
antioxidant,
oxidative
stress,
Previous studies have demonstrated that supplementation with bioactive 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
45
substance or dietary antioxidant could reduce oxidative stress effectively.9-13 Arg is a
46
semiessential amino acid that plays a key role in several metabolic pathways, such as
47
in the biosynthesis of nitric oxide, creatine, protein, and polyamines.14 Arg is also a
48
precursor of nitric oxide, displays prooxidant and antioxidant properties, and
49
contributes to the synthesis of cellular growth factors such as putresine, spermine, and
50
spermidine.15 Arg stimulates NO production within physiological ranges in the small
51
intestine and other tissues,16 and NO plays an important role in regulating the
52
antioxidant defense system.17 Thus, supplementation with Arg helps scavenge the
53
excess ROS induced by LPS, thereby improving the balance between the production
54
of ROS (e.g., superoxideanion, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical) and the
55
biological defense against the toxicity of these oxidants. Within a majority of animals,
56
Arg also plays a significant role of nutritional amino acid under the condition of stress
57
which could be adopted for treating health and developmental problems. Arg
58
functions as one signaling molecule which translates and transmits the change of
59
dietary signal to gene expression through sensing mechanism via one nutrient sensing
60
signaling pathway. More and more evidence suggests that Arg-NO pathway could
61
regulate the metabolisms of nutrient sensing signals and energy substrates.9, 18
62
Nevertheless, there is little research on if Arg could mitigate oxidative injury as
63
well as decrease apoptosis within ovine intestine. We hypothesized that Arg decreases
64
the oxidative injury induced by LPS, hence preventing the apoptosis of IOEC
65
oxidative injury as well as reducing apoptosis within ovine intestine. For testing our
66
hypothesis, LPS was utilized for establishing a cellular injury model for examining 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 34
Page 5 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
67
Arg protective effect upon the oxidative injury induced by LPS and IOEC apoptosis.
68
MATERIALS AND METHODS
69
Reagents. Antibiotics, fetal bovine serum (FBS), and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s
70
F12 Ham medium (DMEM) were bought in Invitrogen (Grand Island, New York,
71
USA). 2.5% of trypsin solution and Arg-free custom-made DMEM (modified DMEM,
72
GIBCO) were acquired in Gibco (Carlsbad, California, USA). Plastic culture plates
73
were produced by Corning Incorporated (Corning, New York, USA) and epidermal
74
growth factor was acquired in BD Biosciences (Bedford, Massachusetts, USA).
75
Unless indicated, each of the other chemicals was bought in Sigma-Aldrich
76
Corporation (Saint Louis, Missouri, USA).
77
Cell Culture. The IOECs, a cell line derived from one neonatal lamb’s jejunum with
78
no suckling, was cultured as described previously.19 To grow IOECs (passages 20–25),
79
the cells were cultured within 75 cm2 plastic flasks with vented capos (BD Falcon)
80
within DMEM which contained 5% FBS, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 100 U/mL
81
penicillin, 1% NEAA, 4 mm/L glutamine, 15 ng/mL EGF and 1× ITS and passaged
82
every 3 d as previously described.20 We changed the medium every 2 d. At the
83
confluence, the cells were seeded and trypsinized within 24-cell culture plates with
84
about 2×104 cells per well. All cell cultures were carried out at 37 °C in a humid
85
incubator that contained 5% CO2. When the confluence of cells was between 85% and
86
95%, cells were passaged routinely (at 1:3 of split ratio).
87
After incubating overnight (16 h), cells were starved within Arg-free
88
custom-made DMEM (modified DMEM, GIBCO) for 6 h for maximizing the total 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
89
amount of Arg within cells. 5% of FBS within Arg-free DMEM offered 10 𝜇M of
90
Arg.
91
Effects of Arg upon Cell Viability Challenged by LPS. IOECs were seeded within
92
96-well plates (1×104/well) as well as cultured within complete DMEM. After
93
incubating overnight (16 h), cells were starved within Arg-free DMEM for 6 h to
94
maximize the amount of Arg in the cells, then IOECs were treated for 24 h
95
(determined by our previous time-dependent experiment) with (1) Con, Arg-free
96
DMEM; (2) Arg treatment, Arg-free DMEM supplemented with 100 μM Arg
97
(determined by our previous dose-dependent experiment); (3) LPS treatment, Arg-free
98
DMEM supplemented with 10 µg/mL LPS (determined by our previous
99
dose-dependent experiment) (LPS from Escherichia coli serotype 055: B5, Sigma
100
Chemical Inc., Saint Louis, Missouri, USA); (4) LPS with Arg treatment, Arg-free
101
DMEM supplemented with both 10 µg/mL LPS and 100 μM Arg.
102
CCK-8 assay was used to determine cell viability in accordance with the protocol
103
of the manufacturer. In brief, IOECs were plated within 96-well culture plates at the
104
density of 6,000 cells/well 24 h before the treatment. After culturing for 24 hours in
105
the different mediums, all cells in the four groups were measured. All values were
106
normalized to control and computed as described previously.21
107
Determination of Malonaldehyde (MDA) and Dehydrogenase (LDH). After
108
culturing for 24 hours in the different mediums, we gathered 1.0 mL of cell
109
supernatant and stored it at -20 ℃ until it was analyzed. We rinsed the cells within
110
6-well culture plates by PBS two times, and then used RIPA Lysis Buffer R2220 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 34
Page 7 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
111
(with 1% of PMSF) for lysing IOECs in accordance with manufacturer’s instruction.
112
Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay reagent was used to determine cellular
113
protein. LDH assay kit was used to determine the level of LDH from the Nanjing
114
Jiangcheng Biotechnology Institute as reported previously.22 MDA assay kit was used
115
to determine the level of MDA from the Nanjing Jiangcheng Biotechnology Institute.
116
We performed each experiment for six times.
117
Flow Cytometry. After a 24 h of incubation, flow cytometry was used to determine
118
apoptotic rate utilizing Annexin V-FITC apoptosis assay kits (Nanjing KeyGen
119
Biotech Company, Nanjing, China) in accordance with the instruction. We defined the
120
apoptotic cells as cells located at right two quadrants of all plots and flow cytometry
121
(FACSCalibur; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA)
122
was used to determine the percentage. CELL Quest software was used to analyze the
123
data, and we performed each experiment for six times.
124
Determination of CAT, total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), SOD, GSH-Px
125
Levels. After a 24 h of incubation, ultrasound treatment was used to break up cells,
126
then they were subjected to the centrifugation to obtain the supernatant. We gathered
127
1.0 mL of cell supernatant and stored it at -20 ℃ until it was analyzed. We gently
128
rinsed the cells within 6-well culture plates using PBS two times, then the RIPA Lysis
129
Buffer R2220 (with 1% of PMSF) was utilized for lysing IOECs in accordance with
130
manufacturer’s instruction. Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay reagent was used
131
to determine cellular protein at 562 nm in accordance with manufacturer’s instruction.
132
We stored the protein sample extracted at -20℃ until it was analyzed. SOD, GSH-Px, 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
133
CAT and T-AOC assay kits from Nanjing Jiangcheng Biotechnology Institute were
134
used to determine the level of SOD, GSH-Px, CAT and T-AOC within cells and the
135
supernatants of cells respectively, as reported previously.23,24 We performed each
136
experiment for six times.
137
Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR) Analysis on Gene Expression. We isolated total RNA
138
from treated cells by Trizol reagent (Sigma, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA) in
139
accordance with manufacturer’s protocol. We conducted real-time PCR as previously
140
described.23,25 We utilized 𝛽-actin as invariant control. We calculated the fold changes
141
of the level of mRNA of targeted genes associated with 𝛽-actin as Schmittgen et al
142
recommended.26 Experiments were performed 6 times. Table 1 shows the genes’
143
primers (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China).
144
Western Blotting. After LPS/Arg treatment for 24 h, we gently rinsed the cells
145
within 6-well culture plates for two times, then we lysed the IOECs by RIPA Lysis
146
Buffer R2220 (with 1% of PMSF) in accordance with manufacturer’s instruction.
147
BCA protein assay reagent was used to determine the protein concentration of cells at
148
562 nm in accordance with manufacturer’s instruction. Equivalent number of protein
149
samples of the cell lysate was loaded for SDS-PAGE, then these samples were
150
transferred to the membrane of PVDF which was blocked with the PBST buffer that
151
contained 5% of skim milk at indoor temperature for 1 h, followed by overnight
152
hybridization at 4 ℃
153
anti-GPx1, anti-SOD2, anti-Nrf2, anti-HO-1, anti-NQO1, anti-P53, anti-Fas, anti-Bcl2,
154
anti-Bax, anti-β-actin and anti-Caspase 3. After incubating for 1 h with the secondary
along with the indicated primary antibodies: anti-CAT,
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 34
Page 9 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
155
antibody (HRP goat anti-rabbit IgG), we detected signals by enhanced
156
chemiluminescence kits (ECL-Plus, Thermo, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), then
157
we scanned them for fluorescence detection by BioRad gel detection system.
158
densitometric value was normalized to β-actin as well as expressed as one relative
159
level to the control value. We conducted each experiment for six times. 24
160
Statistical Analysis. Results, expressed as means with pooled standard error of the
161
means (SEMs), were analyzed using 1-factor ANOVA. We performed Duncan’s
162
multiple range test for measuring the difference between different treatment methods.
163
Statistical analysis was carried out through the SAS software of 9.2 version.
164
Probability value ≤ 0.05 was used to represent significance.
165
RESULTS
166
Cell Growth. In comparison with the Con, addition of LPS dramatically decreased
167
the cell viability (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Addition of arginine increased cell viability
168
induced with LPS in comparison to LPS group (p < 0.05). Relative to Con group, cell
169
viability was greater (p < 0.05) within Arg group.
170
LDH and MDA. The amount of LDH that was released in cells and medium was
171
larger (p < 0.05) within IOECs with LPS treatment (Table 3), and MDA level within
172
cells and medium also was higher (p < 0.05) within IOECs with LPS treatment. Arg
173
significantly reduced the release of LDG and production of MDA (p < 0.05) within
174
IOECs challenged by the LPS.
175
Antioxidation Capacity. In comparison with the Con, addition of LPS significantly
176
reduced CAT, T-AOC, SOD and GSH-PX within supernatants and cells (p < 0.05) 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Each
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
177
(Table 4). While the cells with Arg and LPS treatment markedly raised the level of
178
CAT, T-AOC, SOD and GSH-PX in comparison with those with LPS treatment (p