L‑Arginine Protects Ovine Intestinal Epithelial Cells from

Jan 27, 2019 - Through a 16 h incubation, cells were divided into four groups and the medium was replaced with different medium as follows: (1) contro...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF LOUISIANA

Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions

L-Arginine protects ovine intestinal epithelial cells from lipopolysaccharides-induced apoptosis through alleviating oxidative stress Hao Zhang, Along Peng, Yin Yu, Shuang Guo, Mengzhi Wang, and Hongrong Wang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06739 • Publication Date (Web): 27 Jan 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 27, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

L-Arginine protects ovine intestinal epithelial cells from lipopolysaccharides-induced apoptosis through alleviating oxidative stress Hao Zhang,†,‡ Along Peng,†,‡ Yin Yu,†,‡ Shuang Guo,†,‡ Mengzhi Wang,†,‡ and Hongrong Wang*,†,‡ †Laboratory

of Metabolic Manipulation of Herbivorous Animal Nutrition,

College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, P. R. China ‡Joint

International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety,

the Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, P. R. China.

*Address correspondence to HR-W (e-mail: [email protected]).

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

ABSTRACT: This research aims to explore the effect of l-arginine ( Arg ) upon

2

lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-induced induction of the oxidative stress as well as

3

subsequent apoptosis within ovine intestinal epithelial cells (IOECs). Through a 16 h

4

incubation, cells were divided into four groups and the medium was replaced with

5

different medium as follows: (1) Control (Con), Arg-free Dulbecco’s modified

6

Eagle’s F12 Ham medium (DMEM); (2) Arg treatment, Arg-free DMEM

7

supplemented with 100 µM Arg; (3) LPS treatment, Arg-free DMEM supplemented

8

with 10 µg/mL LPS; (4) LPS with Arg treatment, Arg-free DMEM supplemented

9

with both 10 µg/mL LPS and 100 µM Arg. After culturing for 24 hours in different

10

mediums, some characteristics of cells in the four groups were measured. Addition of

11

Arg increased cell viability induced with LPS compared with LPS group (p < 0.05).

12

Arg significantly decreased the release of dehydrogenase (LDH) and the production

13

of malonaldehyde (MDA) (p < 0.05) within IOECs challenged by the LPS. Compared

14

with the LPS group, cells treated with Arg and Arg + LPS increased (p < 0.05)

15

mRNA as well as protein expression of glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx1), catalase

16

(CAT), superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2), B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2), quinone

17

oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), heme oxygenase (HO-1), and nuclear factor erythroid

18

2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). IOEC treatment with Arg reduced significantly (p < 0.05)

19

apoptosis induced by the LPS (12.58 ± 0.79 %). The results showed that Arg

20

promoted the protein expression of Nrf2, up-regulated expression of the phase II

21

metabolizing enzymes (NQO1 and HO-1) as well as anti-oxidative enzymes (GPx1,

22

CAT and SOD2) for alleviating oxidative injury, and protect IOECs from 2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 34

Page 3 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

23

LPS-induced apoptosis.

24

KEYWORDS:

25

lipopolysaccharides

26

INTRODUCTION

27

Formed by one constant monolayer of differentiating and proliferating intestinal

28

epithelial cells (IECs), intestinal mucosa epithelium is one basis barrier which is the

29

first defense line of human body for protecting against external environment.1

30

Intestinal homeostasis is kept by dynamic, and rigorously regulated epithelial cell

31

migration and proliferation.2 However, oxidative stress might damage intestinal

32

barrier,3 leading to one increased permeation of allergens as well as toxins.

33

Considered as one imbalance state between antioxidant defense and reactive oxygen

34

species (ROS) production, oxidative stress is capable of inducing apoptosis within in

35

vivo and in vitro experiments.3-5 Normal cells have various mechanisms of defense,

36

which include but are not limited to enzymatic antioxidant systems like glutathione

37

peroxidase (GSH-Px), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD), and

38

non-enzymatic antioxidant systems.6,7 It has been shown that lipopolysaccharides

39

(LPS), which is one main integral component of gram-negative bacteria outer

40

membrane, increased oxidative injury by generating lots of ROS, which could result

41

in apoptosis and lipid peroxidation.8 The current research utilized LPS for establishing

42

one cell injury model, in order to investigate the protective effect of l-arginine(Arg)

43

upon ovine intestinal epithelial cells (IOECs).

44

l-arginine,

apoptosis,

antioxidant,

oxidative

stress,

Previous studies have demonstrated that supplementation with bioactive 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

45

substance or dietary antioxidant could reduce oxidative stress effectively.9-13 Arg is a

46

semiessential amino acid that plays a key role in several metabolic pathways, such as

47

in the biosynthesis of nitric oxide, creatine, protein, and polyamines.14 Arg is also a

48

precursor of nitric oxide, displays prooxidant and antioxidant properties, and

49

contributes to the synthesis of cellular growth factors such as putresine, spermine, and

50

spermidine.15 Arg stimulates NO production within physiological ranges in the small

51

intestine and other tissues,16 and NO plays an important role in regulating the

52

antioxidant defense system.17 Thus, supplementation with Arg helps scavenge the

53

excess ROS induced by LPS, thereby improving the balance between the production

54

of ROS (e.g., superoxideanion, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical) and the

55

biological defense against the toxicity of these oxidants. Within a majority of animals,

56

Arg also plays a significant role of nutritional amino acid under the condition of stress

57

which could be adopted for treating health and developmental problems. Arg

58

functions as one signaling molecule which translates and transmits the change of

59

dietary signal to gene expression through sensing mechanism via one nutrient sensing

60

signaling pathway. More and more evidence suggests that Arg-NO pathway could

61

regulate the metabolisms of nutrient sensing signals and energy substrates.9, 18

62

Nevertheless, there is little research on if Arg could mitigate oxidative injury as

63

well as decrease apoptosis within ovine intestine. We hypothesized that Arg decreases

64

the oxidative injury induced by LPS, hence preventing the apoptosis of IOEC

65

oxidative injury as well as reducing apoptosis within ovine intestine. For testing our

66

hypothesis, LPS was utilized for establishing a cellular injury model for examining 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 34

Page 5 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

67

Arg protective effect upon the oxidative injury induced by LPS and IOEC apoptosis.

68

MATERIALS AND METHODS

69

Reagents. Antibiotics, fetal bovine serum (FBS), and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s

70

F12 Ham medium (DMEM) were bought in Invitrogen (Grand Island, New York,

71

USA). 2.5% of trypsin solution and Arg-free custom-made DMEM (modified DMEM,

72

GIBCO) were acquired in Gibco (Carlsbad, California, USA). Plastic culture plates

73

were produced by Corning Incorporated (Corning, New York, USA) and epidermal

74

growth factor was acquired in BD Biosciences (Bedford, Massachusetts, USA).

75

Unless indicated, each of the other chemicals was bought in Sigma-Aldrich

76

Corporation (Saint Louis, Missouri, USA).

77

Cell Culture. The IOECs, a cell line derived from one neonatal lamb’s jejunum with

78

no suckling, was cultured as described previously.19 To grow IOECs (passages 20–25),

79

the cells were cultured within 75 cm2 plastic flasks with vented capos (BD Falcon)

80

within DMEM which contained 5% FBS, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 100 U/mL

81

penicillin, 1% NEAA, 4 mm/L glutamine, 15 ng/mL EGF and 1× ITS and passaged

82

every 3 d as previously described.20 We changed the medium every 2 d. At the

83

confluence, the cells were seeded and trypsinized within 24-cell culture plates with

84

about 2×104 cells per well. All cell cultures were carried out at 37 °C in a humid

85

incubator that contained 5% CO2. When the confluence of cells was between 85% and

86

95%, cells were passaged routinely (at 1:3 of split ratio).

87

After incubating overnight (16 h), cells were starved within Arg-free

88

custom-made DMEM (modified DMEM, GIBCO) for 6 h for maximizing the total 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

89

amount of Arg within cells. 5% of FBS within Arg-free DMEM offered 10 𝜇M of

90

Arg.

91

Effects of Arg upon Cell Viability Challenged by LPS. IOECs were seeded within

92

96-well plates (1×104/well) as well as cultured within complete DMEM. After

93

incubating overnight (16 h), cells were starved within Arg-free DMEM for 6 h to

94

maximize the amount of Arg in the cells, then IOECs were treated for 24 h

95

(determined by our previous time-dependent experiment) with (1) Con, Arg-free

96

DMEM; (2) Arg treatment, Arg-free DMEM supplemented with 100 μM Arg

97

(determined by our previous dose-dependent experiment); (3) LPS treatment, Arg-free

98

DMEM supplemented with 10 µg/mL LPS (determined by our previous

99

dose-dependent experiment) (LPS from Escherichia coli serotype 055: B5, Sigma

100

Chemical Inc., Saint Louis, Missouri, USA); (4) LPS with Arg treatment, Arg-free

101

DMEM supplemented with both 10 µg/mL LPS and 100 μM Arg.

102

CCK-8 assay was used to determine cell viability in accordance with the protocol

103

of the manufacturer. In brief, IOECs were plated within 96-well culture plates at the

104

density of 6,000 cells/well 24 h before the treatment. After culturing for 24 hours in

105

the different mediums, all cells in the four groups were measured. All values were

106

normalized to control and computed as described previously.21

107

Determination of Malonaldehyde (MDA) and Dehydrogenase (LDH). After

108

culturing for 24 hours in the different mediums, we gathered 1.0 mL of cell

109

supernatant and stored it at -20 ℃ until it was analyzed. We rinsed the cells within

110

6-well culture plates by PBS two times, and then used RIPA Lysis Buffer R2220 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 34

Page 7 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

111

(with 1% of PMSF) for lysing IOECs in accordance with manufacturer’s instruction.

112

Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay reagent was used to determine cellular

113

protein. LDH assay kit was used to determine the level of LDH from the Nanjing

114

Jiangcheng Biotechnology Institute as reported previously.22 MDA assay kit was used

115

to determine the level of MDA from the Nanjing Jiangcheng Biotechnology Institute.

116

We performed each experiment for six times.

117

Flow Cytometry. After a 24 h of incubation, flow cytometry was used to determine

118

apoptotic rate utilizing Annexin V-FITC apoptosis assay kits (Nanjing KeyGen

119

Biotech Company, Nanjing, China) in accordance with the instruction. We defined the

120

apoptotic cells as cells located at right two quadrants of all plots and flow cytometry

121

(FACSCalibur; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA)

122

was used to determine the percentage. CELL Quest software was used to analyze the

123

data, and we performed each experiment for six times.

124

Determination of CAT, total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), SOD, GSH-Px

125

Levels. After a 24 h of incubation, ultrasound treatment was used to break up cells,

126

then they were subjected to the centrifugation to obtain the supernatant. We gathered

127

1.0 mL of cell supernatant and stored it at -20 ℃ until it was analyzed. We gently

128

rinsed the cells within 6-well culture plates using PBS two times, then the RIPA Lysis

129

Buffer R2220 (with 1% of PMSF) was utilized for lysing IOECs in accordance with

130

manufacturer’s instruction. Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay reagent was used

131

to determine cellular protein at 562 nm in accordance with manufacturer’s instruction.

132

We stored the protein sample extracted at -20℃ until it was analyzed. SOD, GSH-Px, 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

133

CAT and T-AOC assay kits from Nanjing Jiangcheng Biotechnology Institute were

134

used to determine the level of SOD, GSH-Px, CAT and T-AOC within cells and the

135

supernatants of cells respectively, as reported previously.23,24 We performed each

136

experiment for six times.

137

Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR) Analysis on Gene Expression. We isolated total RNA

138

from treated cells by Trizol reagent (Sigma, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA) in

139

accordance with manufacturer’s protocol. We conducted real-time PCR as previously

140

described.23,25 We utilized 𝛽-actin as invariant control. We calculated the fold changes

141

of the level of mRNA of targeted genes associated with 𝛽-actin as Schmittgen et al

142

recommended.26 Experiments were performed 6 times. Table 1 shows the genes’

143

primers (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China).

144

Western Blotting. After LPS/Arg treatment for 24 h, we gently rinsed the cells

145

within 6-well culture plates for two times, then we lysed the IOECs by RIPA Lysis

146

Buffer R2220 (with 1% of PMSF) in accordance with manufacturer’s instruction.

147

BCA protein assay reagent was used to determine the protein concentration of cells at

148

562 nm in accordance with manufacturer’s instruction. Equivalent number of protein

149

samples of the cell lysate was loaded for SDS-PAGE, then these samples were

150

transferred to the membrane of PVDF which was blocked with the PBST buffer that

151

contained 5% of skim milk at indoor temperature for 1 h, followed by overnight

152

hybridization at 4 ℃

153

anti-GPx1, anti-SOD2, anti-Nrf2, anti-HO-1, anti-NQO1, anti-P53, anti-Fas, anti-Bcl2,

154

anti-Bax, anti-β-actin and anti-Caspase 3. After incubating for 1 h with the secondary

along with the indicated primary antibodies: anti-CAT,

8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 34

Page 9 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

155

antibody (HRP goat anti-rabbit IgG), we detected signals by enhanced

156

chemiluminescence kits (ECL-Plus, Thermo, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), then

157

we scanned them for fluorescence detection by BioRad gel detection system.

158

densitometric value was normalized to β-actin as well as expressed as one relative

159

level to the control value. We conducted each experiment for six times. 24

160

Statistical Analysis. Results, expressed as means with pooled standard error of the

161

means (SEMs), were analyzed using 1-factor ANOVA. We performed Duncan’s

162

multiple range test for measuring the difference between different treatment methods.

163

Statistical analysis was carried out through the SAS software of 9.2 version.

164

Probability value ≤ 0.05 was used to represent significance.

165

RESULTS

166

Cell Growth. In comparison with the Con, addition of LPS dramatically decreased

167

the cell viability (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Addition of arginine increased cell viability

168

induced with LPS in comparison to LPS group (p < 0.05). Relative to Con group, cell

169

viability was greater (p < 0.05) within Arg group.

170

LDH and MDA. The amount of LDH that was released in cells and medium was

171

larger (p < 0.05) within IOECs with LPS treatment (Table 3), and MDA level within

172

cells and medium also was higher (p < 0.05) within IOECs with LPS treatment. Arg

173

significantly reduced the release of LDG and production of MDA (p < 0.05) within

174

IOECs challenged by the LPS.

175

Antioxidation Capacity. In comparison with the Con, addition of LPS significantly

176

reduced CAT, T-AOC, SOD and GSH-PX within supernatants and cells (p < 0.05) 9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Each

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

177

(Table 4). While the cells with Arg and LPS treatment markedly raised the level of

178

CAT, T-AOC, SOD and GSH-PX in comparison with those with LPS treatment (p