Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV
Article
USE OF RECONSTITUTED YOLK SYSTEMS TO STUDY THE GELATION MECHANISM OF FROZEN-THAWED HEN EGG YOLK Monica Primacella, Tong Wang, and Nuria C. Acevedo J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04370 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Dec 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 9, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
USE OF RECONSTITUED YOLK SYSTEMS TO STUDY THE GELATION MECHANISM OF FROZEN-THAWED HEN EGG YOLK
Monica Primacella, Tong Wang, Nuria C. Acevedo*
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University 2312 Food Sciences Building, 536 Farm House Lane, Ames, Iowa 5011, United States
*
Corresponding author
Tel.: 515-294-5962 (N. Acevedo) Fax: 515-294-8181 Email address:
[email protected] ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
2
1
ABSTRACT: Yolk gelation upon 5-week freezing-thawing was studied in 4 recombined yolk
2
systems containing different plasma and granule proportions. Fractionation for mass distribution,
3
sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) for protein distribution
4
and rheological properties were explored. Results indicate that both plasma and granule
5
components including LDL, HDL, and α-livetin proteins, contributed to gelation. Protein
6
aggregation was reflected through large mass increase in granule fraction and appearance of a
7
floating LDL layer upon fractionation of gelated yolk systems. A significant increase in gel
8
strength (elastic modulus, G’) was observed with the increase of granule content. Overall, this
9
study provides a better understanding of yolk gelation mechanism that may consequently lead to
10
the design of innovative methods for preventing gelation. A schematic presentation of yolk
11
gelation mechanism is also proposed.
12
KEYWORDS: egg yolk, gelation, freezing, lipoproteins
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 40
Page 3 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
3
21
INTRODUCTION
22
Hen egg yolk is one of the most used ingredients in many products due to its high
23
nutritional value and unique functionalities. Being an excellent emulsifier, egg yolk is used
24
extensively in foods, such as mayonnaise, salad dressing, and sauces. Recent statistical analysis
25
showed that out of the 231 million cases of shell eggs (or 83 billion eggs) produced in U.S. in
26
2015, approximately 30% underwent breaking for further processing 1. However, when egg
27
yolks are frozen under -6°C and thawed, an irreversible loss of fluidity, termed gelation, occurs.
28
This change is unfavorable because it reduces the yolk functionality and its ability to mix with
29
other ingredients 2. Current gelation prevention practices include the additions of salt, sugar, or
30
corn syrup to yolk prior to freezing 3. However, consumer’s preference for low salt and low
31
sugar products may limit the range of frozen yolk application.
32
Researchers have proposed many different explanations regarding the mechanism of
33
gelation related to its composition. Yolk is composed of about 50% water and 50% dry matter, in
34
which the dry matter could be broken down to 77-81% plasma and 19-23% granules. Plasma
35
contains 85% low density lipoprotein (LDL) and 15% livetin, while granule contains 70% high
36
density lipoprotein (HDL), 16% phosvitin, and 12% LDL 4. Scientists have stated no difference
37
between plasma LDL and granule LDL. The most common explanation for yolk gelation is that
38
there are aggregations of plasma LDLs that result from a concentration of yolk components due
39
to the formation of large ice crystals during freezing 5-7. However, disagreement exists on the
40
mechanism of LDL aggregation. Telis and Kiechbusch 6 proposed that dehydration of proteins
41
located on the surface of LDL micelles following the breaking up of LDL micelles leads to LDL
42
aggregation. Kurisaki et al. 8 suggested surface components of LDL are liberated during freeze-
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
4
43
thaw, causing aggregation of the newly exposed sites. Wakamatu et al. 7 believed that LDL
44
aggregates due to conformational changes, and not because of liberation of LDL components.
45
Interaction of protein molecules after disruption of lecithin-protein interactions is another
46
proposed LDL aggregation mechanism by Mahadevan et al. 9 and Kumar and Mahadevan 10. The
47
real cause of LDL aggregation is still unclear.
48
While majority of studies emphasized the role of plasma LDL in yolk gelation, only a
49
few studies include the granule fraction in their work. Wakamatu et al. 7 indicated that they could
50
not exclude the involvement of granular LDL (LDLg) in LDL aggregation because the lipid
51
compositions of LDL and LDLg were very similar. Chang et al. 5 found that gelation was
52
enhanced when granule is in the system, compared to plasma alone. They proposed that LDLg
53
are released from granules disrupted during freezing, causing both LDL and LDLg to aggregate.
54
Regardless of the differences in existing proposed mechanisms of gelation, most researchers
55
agreed that removal of water through ice crystal formation is necessary for gelation to occur.
56
Removal of water by freezing might have decreased physical distance and increased
57
hydrophobic interaction which cause LDL destabilization. Studies showed that phospholipase-A
58
treated LDL had inhibited gelation because they were more hydrophilic 11, 12. A phospholipase-C
59
treated LDL was more lipophilic and it promoted aggregation 9. This provides some evidence
60
that gelation may be due to surface hydrophobic interactions of LDL.
61
The most recent study on the effect of prolonged freezing storage on egg yolk gelation
62
suggested the occurrence of two-stage gelation, which involved aggregation of lipoprotein
63
particles resulting from water removal during slow freezing in the first stage (d 1-28), and release
64
and re-aggregation between or within the previously aggregated proteins in the second stage
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 40
Page 5 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
5
65
(between d 28-84) forming a stronger gel network 13. The author also suggested that
66
granules/HDL particles were also involved in the aggregation, and various methods including
67
evaluations of particle size, matrix mobility, protein aggregation and microstructure were able to
68
show that these components played a role in gelation. However, the involvement of HDL
69
proteins in gelation still needs further validation.
70
The overall goal of this research is to elucidate how the different yolk fractions are
71
involved in freeze-thawed yolk gelation. We hypothesize that during freezing storage, various
72
types of lipoprotein particles in the plasma and granule fractions interact, resulting in gelation.
73
Yolk recombined systems made with different proportions of plasma and granules were studied,
74
and gel properties of these systems and compositions of their fractionated components were
75
analyzed to test our hypothesis.
76 77 78
MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials Fresh large Grade AA white shell eggs were obtained from farms in Ames, IA. Eggs
79
were produced by Hy-Line W-36 laying hens raised in conventional cage housing, and hens’ age
80
was 30-35 weeks. Eggs were stored in 4ºC refrigerator at the research laboratory for no longer
81
than 7 days.
82
Yolks were separated following the method by Powrie et al. 2 with modifications. Fresh
83
eggs were manually broken and the yolks were carefully separated from the albumen, with the
84
chalazae removed. Each yolk with intact vitelline membrane was rolled on a paper towel to
85
remove any remaining albumen and chalazae adhering to the vitelline membrane. The vitelline
86
membrane was pierced to collect the pure egg yolk in a beaker. Following the harvest of
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
6
87
approximately 1 L of pure egg yolk solution, the yolks in the beaker were slowly stirred for
88
sample homogeneity.
89
Preparation of plasma and granules for recombined yolk systems
90
Yolk was fractionated into plasma and granules using a modified method by McBee and
91
Coterill 14. Yolk was diluted 1:1 (v/v) in deionized water and stirred until they were well-mixed.
92
This dispersion was then centrifuged at 10,000 g for 45 minutes at 4ºC, and the plasma
93
(supernatant) was separated from the granules (pellet). The plasma was centrifuged again using
94
the same parameter for more complete separation of plasma and granules. Following the addition
95
of 200 ppm sodium azide for preservation, the collected fractions were stored in capped
96
containers at 4ºC refrigerator until further processing.
97
Plasma ultrafiltration to remove water
98 99
To remove the added water from centrifugation step, the plasma solution was filtered using the Minimate™ TFF System (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY) with a Minimate™
100
Tangential Flow Filtration Capsules of 5 kD pore size. The filtration was run continuously in 4ºC
101
walk-in refrigerator until plasma volume was reduced by approximately 50%. To ensure
102
adequate water removal, moisture content of plasma was determined using oven drying at 110ºC
103
overnight.
104
Preparation of recombined yolk systems
105
Four yolk systems that would mimic (1) whole egg yolk (78% plasma, 22% granules,
106
db), (2) pure plasma fraction (100% plasma, db), (3) plasma mixed with 50% granule fraction
107
(88% plasma, 12% granules, db), and (4) granule mixed with 50% plasma fraction (64% plasma,
108
36% granules, db) were prepared by adding the filtered plasma fraction to the granule fraction
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 40
Page 7 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
7
109
using calculated proportions (Table 2.1). Moisture and total solid contents were kept constant
110
across the four systems, 53% and 47%, respectively. Mixtures were stirred manually using
111
spatula before mixed with Ultra-Turrax® T rotor stator homogenizer (Laboratory Supply
112
Network, Inc., Atkinson, NH) at 8,000 RPM for 30 seconds for a more homogenous mixture.
113
Yolk freezing and thawing for gel formation
114
The yolk systems were divided into three batches: fresh, frozen, and frozen for rheology
115
and gel measurements. For the frozen samples, 40 g of each yolk mixture was poured into a 50
116
mL conical polypropylene centrifuge tube, and they were vacuum-sealed in a vacuum bag with a
117
FoodSaver® V222 vacuum sealing system (SunBeam Products, Inc., Jarden Consumer Solutions,
118
Boca Raton, FL) to reduce freezer burn. The vacuum-sealed bag of four centrifuge tubes
119
containing the different systems was submerged in the reservoir of a Haake SC 100
120
refrigerated/heated bath circulator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) filled with 1:1
121
ethylene glycol:Milli-Q water at 0°C. The bath was then set to -20°C. After the samples reached
122
-20°C at a cooling rate of 0.3°C/min, they were held in the -20°C bath for 3 hours before storing
123
in a -20°C freezer for 5 weeks.
124
Preparation of samples for rheological analysis
125
Samples for rheology were prepared following a method by Au et al. 13 using a custom-
126
made aluminum apparatus composed of two heat transfer blocks (23.2 cm length, 7.2 cm width,
127
2.5 cm height) and an aluminum mold plate (23.2 cm length, 7.2 cm width, 3 mm height) with
128
five circles of 35 mm-diameter cutouts. The heat transfer blocks were connected with plastic
129
tubing positioned level to the inlet and outlet ports on Haake SC 100 refrigerated/heated water
130
bath circulator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) with 1:1 ethylene glycol:Milli-Q water
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
8
131
mixture circulated through the blocks. When temperature reached 0°C, a sheet of Parafilm was
132
placed over the bottom block, followed by the aluminum mold plate filled with egg yolk and
133
another sheet of Parafilm to cover the mold plate. The top heat transfer block was quickly placed
134
over the filled mold plate, and the cooling bath was set to -20°C. After reaching -20°C at a
135
cooling rate of 0.3°C/min, the yolks were held in the apparatus for another hour before the mold
136
plate was removed and sealed in a vacuum bag to reduce freezer burn. The samples were then
137
stored in a -20°C freezer for 5 weeks.
138
Fractionation of egg yolk into plasma, granule, LDL and livetin fractions
139
The four fresh and frozen-thawed yolk systems were fractionated using a method
140
modified from Ulrichs and Ternes 15 and McBee and Cotterill 14, immediately for fresh yolk after
141
they were recombined and five weeks for the frozen-thawed samples. Mixtures of 1:3
142
yolk:deionized water were prepared and stirred until well mixed. The mixtures were again mixed
143
with Rotor-Stator at 8,000 RPM for 30 seconds to improve homogenization. Then, 30 mL of
144
each yolk:water mixture was aliquoted to three 50 mL conical polypropylene centrifuge tubes.
145
The tubes were transferred to a FIBERLite F15-8x-50cy fixed angle rotor in a Sorvall Legend
146
XT centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) and centrifuged at 15,500 g and 4°C for 1
147
hour. The plasma (supernatant), granule (pellet), and LDL (floating lipidic layer from frozen
148
systems) were collected and the mass was recorded.
149
The collected plasma was further fractionated into LDL and livetin using a method
150
modified from Ulrichs and Ternes 15. Mixtures of 3:2 plasma:1% (w/v) carboxymethyl cellulose
151
solution were centrifuged with the same parameter as above. The LDL (floating lipidic layer)
152
and livetin (watery fraction) were collected and the mass was recorded.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 40
Page 9 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
9
153
Determination of mass balance of all fractionated yolk components
154
Small amounts of all fractions were taken for moisture/solid content analysis. Samples
155
were 130°C oven-dried overnight, transferred to a desiccator for 5 minutes, and measured for
156
change in mass. Moisture and solid contents were calculated to allow all data to be converted to
157
dry mass balance (db). Fraction distributions (%) within each system were then compared among
158
yolk systems and between fresh and gelled yolk for changes in fractionation behavior caused by
159
freezing and thawing.
160
Protein characterization by gel electrophoresis
161
Protein distributions of fresh and frozen samples of all four recombined yolk systems
162
were studied using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)
163
performed according to Bio-Rad instructions and a modified method from Laca, Paredes, and
164
Díaz 16. Samples of different fractions from each system were diluted in deionized water based
165
on their estimated protein content quantified using bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay and then 1:1
166
(v/v) in a mixture of 95% Bio-Rad 2x Laemmli Sample Buffer (Tris-HCl/glycerol/bromophenol
167
blue) and 5% β-mercaptoethanol, to bring sample concentrations to approximately 1 µg
168
protein/µL. After dilutions, samples were heated in boiling water bath for 6 minutes. Protein
169
standard Precision Plus Protein™ Dual Color Standards (BioRad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules,
170
CA) and samples containing fractions from the same system were loaded onto a Bio-Rad Mini-
171
PROTEAN® TGX™ precast polyacrylamide gel (4–20% gel, 12-well, 20 µL) at volume of 5 µL
172
for standard and 7 µL for samples, and electrophoresed at 175 V for 35 minutes using the
173
standard SDS-PAGE running buffer (250 mmol Tris, 1.92 mol glycine, and 10 g SDS per L).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
10
174
The gels were fixed in a solution consisting of 40% methanol, 10% acetic acid and 50%
175
deionized water for 30 minutes. After removing the solution, 50 mL Bio-Safe™ Coomassie F-250
176
Stain was added to stain the gels, and gels were gently shaken for 1 hour before rinsed with
177
deionized water for 30 minutes. Gels were scanned with an ImageScanner flatbed scanner
178
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Piscataway, NJ) for quantification and kept in water for
179
storage.
180
For densitometry analysis, the scanned images of the gels were processed with Image
181
Processing and Analysis in Java software, ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
182
An external standard was used for calibration following the NIH optical density calibration
183
procedure 17. Each lane on the gel was plotted as a density spectrum where each peak represented
184
a protein band. Each protein band was compared to published literature 18 for protein
185
identification and the optical density, or peak area, was determined. Density is reported in
186
percent relative optical density units (%OD).
187
Rheological analysis
188
After five weeks of freezing, yolk discs were analyzed using an Ares-G2 rheometer (TA
189
Instruments, New Castle, DE) with a set of 25 mm diameter parallel plates. Sample thawing was
190
performed for one disk at a time. A polyvinyl chloride cylindrical plunger (35 mm diameter, 62
191
mm height) was used to push the yolk disk out of the mold to thaw on the bottom parallel plate at
192
room temperature (23ºC) for 15 minutes.
193
All four yolk systems, 10 replicate discs each, were subjected to an oscillation amplitude
194
sweep test. Normal force of 0.2 N was applied for all samples. Oscillation strains in the range of
195
0.1-10% was applied at a frequency of 1 Hz with 41 steps (data points). The average elastic
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 40
Page 11 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
11
196
modulus (G’) within the linear viscoelastic region (LVR) was reported as a measure of gel
197
strength. Yield stress (σ*) was obtained as the stress where a 10% reduction from the average G’
198
of was achieved.
199
With outliers removed, average G’ and σ* were analyzed for significant difference.
200
Values outside mean±2SD range were considered as outliers. With the outliers eliminated, 9
201
discs from system 1:0, 5 discs from system 1:0.5, 8 discs from system 1:1, and 9 discs from
202
system 1:2 were used for data analysis.
203
Statistical analysis
204
Statistical analysis was performed for rheology samples (1 treatment replication, >5
205
samples replications) with JMP Pro 12, statistical software from Statistical Analysis System
206
(SAS) Institute Inc. (Cary, NC). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were conducted,
207
and significance of difference (p-value