Formation and Stability of Core–Shell Nanofibers by Electrospinning

Oct 8, 2018 - Core–shell nanofibers were fabricated by electrospinning of gel-like corn oil emulsions stabilized by gelatin. The oil-in-water (O/W) ...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Sunderland

Biofuels and Biobased Materials

Formation and stability of core-shell nanofibers by electrospinning of gel-like corn oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by gelatin Cen Zhang, and Hui Zhang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04270 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Oct 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 9, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Formation and stability of core-shell nanofibers by electrospinning of

2

gel-like corn oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by gelatin

3

Cen Zhang a, Hui Zhang a,*

4

a

5

National Engineering Laboratory of Intelligent Food Technology and Equipment,

6

Key Laboratory for Agro-Products Postharvest Handling of Ministry of Agriculture,

7

Key Laboratory for Agro-Products Nutritional Evaluation of Ministry of Agriculture,

8

Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Agro-Food Processing, Fuli Institute of Food Science,

9

College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University,

10

Hangzhou 310058, China

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

__________________________

22

*

23

Corresponding author. Tel.: +86-571-88982981; fax: +86-571-88982981. E–mail address: [email protected]

24

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

25

ABSTRACT: The core-shell nanofibers were fabricated by electrospinning of

26

gel-like corn oil emulsions stabilized by gelatin. The oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions

27

satisfied the Herschel-Bulkley rheological model and showed shear-thinning and

28

predominantly elastic gel behaviours. The increasing oil fractions (φ) ranging from 0

29

to 0.6 remarkably increased the apparent viscosity, and then led to an increase in the

30

average diameter and encapsulation efficiency of electrospun fibers. The core-shell

31

structured fibers by emulsion electrospinning were observed in transmission electron

32

microscopy (TEM) images. The encapsulated oil was found to randomly distribute as

33

core, especially inside the beads. The binding of corn oil to gelatin was mainly driven

34

by the non-covalent forces. These core-shell fibers at various φ values (φ = 0.2, 0.4,

35

0.6 and 0.8) showed a high thermal decomposition stability upon heating to 250 °C,

36

and the denaturation temperature were 85.32, 77.97, 82.99 and 87.25 °C, respectively.

37

The corn oil encapsulated in emulsion-based fiber mats had good storage stability

38

during 5 days. These results contributed to a good understanding on emulsion

39

electrospinning of food materials for potential applications in bioactive encapsulation,

40

enzyme immobilization and active food packaging.

41

KEYWORDS: Gelatin; Corn oil; Gel-like emulsions; Emulsion electrospinning;

42

Core-shell nanofibers

43

44 2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 39

Page 3 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

45

INTRODUCTION

46

Electrospinning, as a simple and promising technique, has been used to fabricate

47

micro- and nanofibers from a variety of polymers. During the electrospinning process,

48

a polymer jet was charged and ejected in a high-voltage power system. The

49

continuous fibers were obtained along with the evaporation of the solvent.1 Various

50

structural advantages of the electrospun fibers (e.g., ultrafine fibrous structures, high

51

surface area to volume ratio, high porosity, etc.) have good application potentials in

52

food, cosmetics, pharmaceutical and biomedical industries.2 Currently, the

53

electrospinning technique used to develop a controlled-release delivery are blending,

54

coaxial or emulsion electrospinning, etc.,3,4,5 thus resulting in nanofibers with various

55

shapes, including uniform, beaded and flat/ribbon fibers.6 Although the application of

56

the blending electrospinning technique allowed the fabrication of polymer fibers

57

loaded with bioactive compounds (e.g., vitamins, coumarins, and flavonoids), the

58

bioactive compounds have to be dissolved or dispersed (if insoluble) in the solution

59

prior to electrospinning. Then, the distribution of bioactive compounds inside the

60

fibers is highly determined by the physicochemical properties of the solution and the

61

interactions between the compounds and solution.7 Additionally, sensitive bioactive

62

compounds (e.g., peptide, enzymes, and cytokines) may compromise their bioactivity

63

due to the possible denaturation in the solvents. Coaxial and emulsion electrospinning

64

are both available to fabricate core-shell structured fibers. Compared to coaxial

65

electrospinning, emulsion electrospinning can be easily accomplished using only a

66

single nozzle, and there is no need to precisely control the process variables (e.g., 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

67

interfacial tension, feed rate, viscoelasticity of the two polymers). Therefore, emulsion

68

electrospinning can provide a simpler approach to decrease the burst release of

69

bioactive compounds inside the fibers.

70

Core-shell nanofibers can be produced directly by electrospinning of either the

71

oil-in-water (O/W) or water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions, which help to preserve the

72

activity and bioavailability of encapsulated compounds. Cai et al. found that the

73

electrospun Van/OA-MIONs-PLA nanofibers made from W/O Pickering emulsions

74

possessed desirable mechanical and antibacterial properties.8 On the other hand, the

75

nanofibers by electrospinning of O/W emulsions have been also developed as a

76

delivery vehicle of hydrophobic compounds. Shin and Lee loaded phytoncide into an

77

O/W emulsions stabilized by Tween 80, and then fabricated phytoncide/poly(vinyl

78

alcohol) nanofibers by emulsion electrospinning. The obtained nanofibers had a

79

core-shell structure and showed a sustained manner over 14 days as well as strong

80

antimicrobial effects.9 To date, Tween 20 and Brij O10 have been small molecular

81

surfactants commonly used in emulsion electrospinning.10,11 However, the toxicity

82

and biodegradation of the surfactants can not be neglected, and the side bulging and

83

rough morphology of nanofibers may be caused by the migration of some of the

84

surfactants from the oil-water interface to the nanofiber surface during the

85

electrospinning process.12

86

Although many studies have focused on the fabrication of nanofibers by

87

electrospinning of O/W emulsions, no report is available on gelatin used as

88

emulsifying agents in emulsion electrospinning, in which gelatin could enhance the 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 39

Page 5 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

89

viscosity and stabilize O/W emulsions, independently of the surfactants used. As a

90

safe and economic material, gelatin has been widely used to enhance the stability,

91

elasticity and consistency of food products.13 Gelatin is also employed as emulsifiers

92

in the stabilization of O/W emulsions because it has amphiphilic characteristics due to

93

its amino acid composition. Additionally, gelatin can form time-dependent gel-like

94

stabilizing layers at the surface of emulsion droplets, which may modify rheology

95

properties to slow down the creaming process.14 The unique chemo-physical

96

properties of gelatin such as emulsifying property, surface tension as well as its

97

viscosity and conductivity contributed to the good spinnability.15 Recently, the

98

gelatin-based electrospun fibers have drawn much attention in the field of controlled

99

release of bioactive compounds due to its non-toxicity, biocompatibility and

100

biodegradability. Li et al. incorporated vitamin A and E into the nanofibers by

101

electrospinning of gelatin, with the aim of achieving their sustained release.16 Laha et

102

al. fabricated the crosslinked gelatin nanofibers as a carrier for hydrophobic drug

103

piperine,

104

controlled-release properties at varying pH conditions.17

and

these

electrospun

fibers

showed

good

compatibility

and

105

The aim of the current study was to fabricate core-shell structured fibers by

106

electrospinning of corn oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by gelatin, which were

107

expected to act as a carrier for hydrophobic compounds. The morphology of the

108

core-shell nanofibers was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM),

109

transmission electron microscope (TEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy

110

(CLSM). The thermal behavior and conformational changes of the nanofiber mats 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

111

were evaluated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning

112

calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR). In addition, the rheology

113

and microstructure of the emulsions were characterized by rheological measurements

114

and optical microscopy.

115

MATERIALS AND METHODS

116

Materials. Gelatin (Type B, ~250 g Bloom, MW~100 kDa) from porcine skin and

117

Nile Red were purchased from Aladdin, Inc. (Shanghai, China). Corn oil was obtained

118

from a local supermarket. The other reagents obtained from Sinopharm Chemical

119

Reagent Co. (Shanghai, China) were of analytical reagent grade. All the reagents were

120

used without further processing, and the ultrapure water was used throughout the

121

experiments.

122

Preparation of the Oil-in-water (O/W) Emulsions. Initially, aqueous phases were

123

prepared by dissolving gelatin (25%, w/v) in 40% (v/v) acetic aqueous solution. Corn

124

oil was then added dropwise at the concentrations of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 (v/v) with

125

respect to the gelatin solution during stirring. The mixed solutions were homogenized

126

using a high-speed homogenizer (IKA T18 digital ULTRA-TURRAX®, IKA GmbH,

127

Germany) at 6,000 rpm for 2 min, and subsequently the emulsions at various oil

128

fractions (φ = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8) were obtained by ultrasonic treatment (Model

129

KQ-250DE, Ultrasonic Corporation, Kunshan, China) at 250 W for 3 min at room

130

temperature (25 ± 5 °C).

131

Optical microscopy. Optical microscopy images of the emulsions were recorded 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 39

Page 7 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

132

using a Leica ICC50 W optical microscope (Carl Zeiss, German) equipped with a

133

built-in camera. An aliquot of sample was deposited on a microscope slide, and then

134

photographed using a 40× objective lens and 10× eyepiece.

135

Steady Shear Viscosities. Steady shear viscosities of the emulsions at different φ

136

values were measured using a rotational rheometer (MCR 302, Anton Paar, Graz,

137

Austria) equipped with a circulating water bath at 25 °C. A plate/plate measuring setup

138

(PP50) was chosen, and the gap between two plates was set to 1.0 mm. the shear rate

139

was continuously ramped from 1 to 100 s−1.

140 141

The flow properties of the emulsions were evaluated using Herschel-Bulkley model: σ = σ0 + K·γn

142 143

where σ and σ0 denote the shear stress and the apparent yield stress, respectively. K is

144

the consistency index, which means apparent viscosity of the examined emulsions. γ

145

is the shear rate, and n represents the flow behavior index.

146

Viscoelastic Properties. Oscillatory frequency sweep experiments were performed

147

at 1% strain within the identified linear viscoelastic region to investigate the

148

viscoelastic properties of the gel-like emulsions. The frequency was oscillated from 1

149

to 100 rad s−1. The elastic modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) were recorded using

150

RheoCompass software.

151

Electrospinning Process. Electrospinning of the emulsions was performed in

152

horizontal alignment at an applied voltage of 15 kV and a tip-to-collector distance of

153

100 mm. The feed rate of syringe pump (LSP02-1B, Baoding Longer Precision Pump 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

154

Co., Ltd., China) loaded with the spinning solution was set at 0.5 mL h−1. The

155

electrospun nanofibers were collected on a grounded cylindrical aluminium foil. The

156

temperature and humidity throughout the electrospinning were kept at 25 °C and

157

around 50%, respectively.

158

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). SEM (SU8010, Hitachi, Japan) was used

159

to observe the morphology of the electrospun fibers at an acceleration voltage of 3 kV.

160

The fiber diameters in the SEM images were measured using Nano Measure software

161

by randomly selecting 200 data points for each image.

162

Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM). TEM (JEM-1200EX, Jeol Ltd, Tokyo,

163

Japan) was applied to confirm the core-shell structure of nanofibers, which were

164

spread onto copper grid and observed at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV.

165

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM). To confirm the distribution of

166

corn oil within the nanofibers, the electrospun fibers stained with Nile Red (0.01%

167

w/w solution) were directly collected on microscope glass slides. The analysis was

168

operated on CLSM (LSM780, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany) using an EC

169

Plan-Neofluar 40×/1.30 oil immersion objective at an excitation wavelength of 488

170

nm.

171

FTIR Spectroscopy. A FTIR spectrometer (Nicolet 170-SX, Thermo Nicolet Ltd.,

172

USA) was used to record the infrared spectra of the nanofiber mats over the

173

wavenumber range of 400 - 4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1 and 32 scans.

174

Thermogravimetric Analysis. A TA-Q500 thermal gravimetric analyzer (TGA)

175

was applied to investigate the thermal degradation behavior of the nanofiber mats. 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 39

Page 9 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

176

Samples (ca. 8 mg) were heated from 50 to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1

177

under nitrogen atmosphere.

178

DSC Measurements. The thermal properties of the electrospun fibers were

179

evaluated on DSC (DSC-1, Mettler-Toledo corp., Switzerland) under a nitrogen

180

atmosphere with a flow rate of 50 mL min−1. Samples were accurately weighed into

181

40 mL aluminum pans. Thermal scans were conducted in a temperature range from 25

182

to 250 °C with a scan rate of 10 °C min−1.

183

Measurements of Encapsulation Efficiency and Storage Stability. The

184

encapsulation efficiency of the electrospun mats were determined according to the

185

method reported previously with modifications.18 Corn oil was dissolved in

186

dichloromethane to prepare a series of standard solutions at different known

187

concentrations, and were scanned in the wavelength range of 200 - 600 nm

188

spectrophotometrically (SP-752 UV-visible spectrophotometer, Shanghai Spectrum

189

Instruments Co. Ltd., China). The maximum absorbance was determined at 290 nm,

190

and a standard curve of corn oil was obtained using a linear regression model. Then,

191

10 mg of each fiber sample was added to 10 mL dichloromethane under stirring (100

192

rpm) for 15 min. Subsequently, the suspensions were filtered through nylon syringe

193

filter with a 0.45 μm pore size. The absorbance of resulting solutions at 290 nm was

194

recorded. The blanks were the electrospun gelatin fibers without corn oil. The

195

concentration of corn oil on the fiber surface was calculated using the standard curve

196

(R2 = 0.9992). To investigate the storage stability of the encapsulated corn oil, the

197

electrospun mats were kept in open culture dishes at relative humidity ranging from 9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

198

30 to 40%, and the change in the absorbance at 290 nm was recorded at 2 days

199

interval. The encapsulation efficiency was determined by the following equation:

200

Encapsulation efficiency (%) = (Wi − Ws)/ Wi × 100

201

where Wi and Ws denote the initial weight of corn oil added for encapsulation and the

202

weight of corn oil on fiber surface calculated according to the standard curve,

203

respectively.

204

Statistical Analysis. All the measurements were carried out in triplicate. Data were

205

analyzed using Origin 8.0 and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).

206

One-way ANOVA was performed to determine the statistically significance at p
0.99) (Table 1). According to the

227

parameters obtained by Herschel-Bulkley model, the non-linear relationship between

228

shear stress and shear rate of the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at various oil

229

fractions demonstrated the shear-thinning behavior of the emulsions as a

230

non-Newtonian fluid, which may be caused by breaking the network of entangled

231

polymers during shearing. Then, the speed of disrupting intermolecular entanglement

232

was faster than that of reformation, leading to lower apparent viscosity and less

233

intermolecular resistance to flow.23 The σ0 was an indicator of the resistance of the

234

emulsion droplets and network to gravitational separation. As the oil fractions were

235

increased, the σ0 values of the emulsions were increased, and the low σ0 value of the

236

emulsions with low oil fractions may be inclined to separate as described by Torres et

237

al..24 Additionally, the behavior of high viscosity was strongly influenced by the high

238

stabilizer concentration or dispersed phase volume in the examined systems. The

239

increase in oil fractions of O/W emulsions led to the increased value of K and then the

240

changes in the viscosity of continuous phase. The n value reflected the degree of 11

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

241

non-Newtonian behavior. All the n values were less than 1 (Table 1), indicating the

242

pseudoplastic fluid characteristics of the O/W emulsions (Figure 1B).24 Moreover, the

243

increase in φ values of the O/W emulsions resulted in the decreased n value,

244

indicating that the deviation from Newtonian behavior was increased.25

245

Viscoelastic Properties of O/W Emulsions. The viscoelastic property of the corn

246

oil emulsions stabilized by gelatin was determined by dynamic oscillation

247

measurements. The emulsions at various φ values showed that G′ modulus was

248

predominantly higher than G″ modulus at a given frequency over the range of 1 - 100

249

rad s−1, indicating the presence of a gel-like structure in the O/W emulsion system.26

250

The significant increase was observed regarding G′ modulus in emulsions with φ

251

values increasing from 0.2 to 0.6. This may be attributed to the hydrocolloid-induced

252

formation of an entanglement network between adsorbed and non-adsorbed proteins,

253

and the oil droplets stabilized by proteins served as ‘active fillers’ in the gel network

254

of the emulsions.27 On the other hand, both the tested modulus of these emulsions

255

slightly but progressively increased with the increasing frequency (Figure 1C). A

256

similar trend regarding the rise of G′ and G″ modulus with the increasing frequency

257

has been also observed for the gel-like emulsions stabilized by texturised whey

258

protein concentrate, which was ascribed to a predominantly solid behavior of the

259

gel-like emulsions with long term stability.20

260

Droplet Size and Microstructure of the Emulsions. The extensive dilution and

261

ultrasonic treatment were necessary for the determination of average droplet size in

262

the concentrated emulsions using a light-scattering instrument, which may not ensure 12

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 39

Page 13 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

263

that a sample examined actually properly represented the gel-like emulsions. Then a

264

light microscope was available to assess the presence and aggregation extent of oil

265

droplets in the emulsions as a straightforward and reliable way.

266

As the φ value was increased from 0.2 to 0.6, the diameter of the oil droplets

267

progressively increased. The average diameter of the oil droplets at φ = 0.2 was 5.82

268

μm, and the emulsions consisted of aggregated oil droplets (Figure 2A). The

269

inter-droplet attractive interactions may contribute to the formation of the gel-like

270

network. Additionally, at the low φ value, the unabsorbed proteins would tend to form

271

the aggregates driven by hydrophobic interactions after the emulsification, which may

272

be helpful to the formation of the network.28 When the φ value was increased to 0.4,

273

the increasing average diameter of the oil droplets might result in a closer packing and

274

then a more compact gel network (Figure 2B). Chivero, Gohtani, Yoshii, and

275

Nakamura also reported that an improved emulsion stability at higher oil fractions

276

may be associated with a strong network formed among the close droplets. The oil

277

droplet size became larger and came up to 14.67 μm at φ = 0.6 (Figure 2C), indicating

278

the stronger interactions between protein-stabilized oil droplets and much less

279

unabsorbed proteins present in the system.21,29 However, when the φ value rose up to

280

0.8, some larger oil droplets were observed in the emulsions (Figure 2D). Since the φ

281

value was increased, the volume of aqueous phase was relatively decreased. Then, the

282

amount of gelatin emulsifier might be not sufficient to cover the O/W interface,

283

resulting in the formation of larger droplets.22 The changes of the oil droplets with the

284

increasing φ values were well in accordance with the observed flow behaviors under 13

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

285

precisely controlled conditions. Liu and Tang also found that the droplet size of

286

Pickering emulsions basically increased along with the increasing oil volume fractions,

287

even coarser emulsions were formed at higher oil fractions.30

288

Morphology and Microstructure of Electrospun Nanofibers. The uniform and

289

bead-free nanofibers could be obtained by electrospinning of the pure gelatin with an

290

average diameter of 148.9 nm (Figure 3A). For the gelatin-stabilized emulsions, the

291

increasing φ values from 0.2 to 0.8 appreciably affected the formation of the

292

electrospun fibers. As shown in Figure 3B, the O/W emulsions yielded fibers with the

293

average diameter of 198.4 nm at φ = 0.2, and a great number of beads were

294

interspersed along the strings. It could be thus inferred that the oil droplets tended to

295

accumulate in the center of the liquid along the direction of fluid due to the elongation

296

effect in the expanding and bending process of fluid jets during electrospinning,

297

which might contribute to the encapsulation of beads into fibers rather than on

298

surfaces.31 When the φ value was increased to 0.4, the electrospun nanofibers had

299

larger diameters, indicating that more corn oil was encapsulated in the fibers (Figure

300

3C). Similarly, Gordon et al. reported that the increasing isohexadecane (oil phase)

301

from 5.8 to 15% (w/w) resulted in the increasing average diameter of PVA fibers from

302

246 to 268 nm.32 Although it was expected that the fibers produced from emulsions

303

with higher φ values (e.g., at φ = 0.6) had a further increase in diameters (Figure 3D),

304

the fibers tended to be merged together and lose the fiber morphology to some extent.

305

At φ = 0.8, the nanofibers adhered to one another, and the fibrous structure could be

306

hardly observed in SEM images (Figure 3E). These morphological changes may be 14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 39

Page 15 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

307

attributed to the balance of the oil volume fraction and the viscosity of emulsions as a

308

result of the amount of corn oil entrapped and the aggregation extent of oil droplets in

309

the emulsions.33

310

As shown in Figure 4A, TEM observations showed that the nanofibers by

311

electrospinning of the gel-like emulsion at φ = 0.2 possessed an obvious core-shell

312

structure. The encapsulated oil was not just located inside the beads as core, but a

313

portion of corn oil was randomly distributed in the gelatin matrix. By taking a closer

314

look at the core-shell structure of one single fiber (Figure 4B), the distinct boundaries

315

between the inner dark and outer light region was found in TEM images, indicating

316

the different transmissibility of electron beam through the center and side regions. It

317

was evidence that corn oil was wrapped into the center of the bead of the shell

318

material.34 Clearly, the outer diameter was about 400 nm while the inner diameter was

319

around 290 nm. The W/O emulsion electrospinning was reported by Xu et al.,35 who

320

suggested that the viscosity difference between the PEG-PLA/chloroform matrix and

321

the PEO-FITC/water droplets led to the inward movement of the emulsion droplets

322

and their mergence to some extent. In this study, the rapid evaporation of the acetic

323

aqueous solution led to the increasing viscosity of the outer layer (water phase), more

324

rapidly than that of the inner layer. Thus, the inward movement of emulsion droplets

325

from the surface to the center was caused by the viscosity gradient from the outer

326

layer to the inner layer, and the droplets were simultaneously condensed and stretched

327

into elliptical shapes in the direction of the fibrous trajectory under the force of high

328

voltage electric field. Finally, the core-shell nanofibers were obtained on the grounded 15

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

329

collector.

330

To identify whether the corn oil was successfully encapsulated in the nanofibers,

331

the distribution of corn oil within the nanofibers was observed by CLSM. The

332

fluorescence emitted only from the fibers was clearly observed in CLSM images,

333

while no fluorescent intensity was detected in the space between the fibers (Figure

334

4C). The corn oil stained with Nile Red (yellow core) were coated by gelatin (outer

335

dark layer), indicating the successful fabrication of core-shell fibers with corn oil in

336

the core. Dai, Niu, Liu, Yin, and Xu successfully encapsulated laccase into

337

PDLLA/F108 nanofibers by electrospinning of W/O emulsions, and identified that

338

laccase was located in the core of the core-shell fibers using CLSM.36 Yang, Li, Qi,

339

Zhou, and Weng showed the presence of the labeled lysozyme inside the composite

340

fibers, and confirmed that the emulsion-based electrospun fibers had a core-shell

341

structure under CLSM.34

342

Thermal Analysis. The thermal stability changes of the electrospun nanofibers

343

were monitored by TGA analysis. There were two stages involved in the

344

decomposition of the gelatin nanofibers on the TGA curves (Figure 5A). The initial

345

stage of weight loss began at 50 °C and ended up with around 100 °C, which could be

346

described as moisture vaporization of gelatin samples due to its hygroscopic property.

347

The second stage in the range of 250 - 600 °C was the major zone of weight loss,

348

corresponding to the main thermal degradation including protein chain breakage and

349

peptide bond rupture.37 Unlike the gelatin fibers, nanofibers fabricated by

350

electrospinning of the gelatin-stabilized emulsions showed a single stage of thermal 16

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 16 of 39

Page 17 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

351

degradation ranging from 250 to 450 °C. Therefore, the fibers at various oil fractions

352

(φ = 0 - 0.8) had a high thermal decomposition stability upon heating to 250 °C.

353

Below the onset decomposition temperature (250 °C), DSC measurements were

354

conducted to investigate the thermal properties of these fibers. The denaturation

355

temperature (TD) and the corresponding denaturation enthalpy (ΔHD) were obtained

356

from the characteristic endothermic peaks (Figure 5B), which were associated

357

with the conformational helix–coil transition of gelatin.38 The TD of the nanofibers by

358

gelatin electrospinning was about 89.67 °C, while the TD of the electrospun fibers

359

made from the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions (φ = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8) were 85.32,

360

77.97, 82.99 and 87.25 °C, respectively (Table 2). This moderate decrease in TD might

361

be due to a rearrangement of the triple helix into a random configuration.39

362

FTIR Analysis. The possible interactions between gelatin and corn oil in the

363

electrospun nanofibers were examined by FTIR spectra (Figure 6). Generally, the

364

characteristic bands of proteins at 3291 - 3298 cm−1 belonged to the stretching of N-H

365

and hydrogen bonding for the amide A. The amide I band (1636 - 1643 cm−1) was

366

assigned to the stretching of C=O. The amide II band at about 1541 cm−1 was ascribed

367

to the stretching and bending of C-N. The spectra showed a peak at around 1456 cm−1,

368

which was assigned to N-H bending and C-N stretching combination band as well as

369

NH3+ symmetric deformation. The amide III band between 1241 and 1243 cm−1 was

370

associated with the stretching of C-N and bending of N-H.40 For the corn oil, the peak

371

at around 3008 cm−1 represented C-H stretching vibration of the cis-double bond

372

(=CH). The 2925 and 2854 cm−1 bands were assigned to symmetric and asymmetric 17

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

373

stretching vibration of the aliphatic CH2 group. The peak at 1745 cm−1 could be

374

explained by the presence of ester carbonyl groups of the triglycerides. The bands at

375

1464 and 1377 cm−1 belonged to bending vibrations of the CH2 and CH3 aliphatic

376

groups as well as CH2 groups. In the fingerprint region, the band at around 1162 cm−1

377

denoted the stretching vibration of the C-O ester groups.41 The characteristic bands of

378

both the gelatin fibers and corn oil were found in all the spectra of the nanofiber mats

379

by emulsion electrospinning (φ = 0.2 - 0.8), and no obvious change in the intensity

380

and position of these peaks was observed, indicating that the binding of corn oil to

381

gelatin may be mainly driven by the non-covalent interaction forces.

382

The amide I band may provide the information of the secondary structures of

383

proteins. The curve-fitting analysis of the amide I region (1700 - 1600 cm−1) was used

384

to quantitatively determine the secondary structural changes of gelatin.42 The spectral

385

bands ranging from 1610 to 1640 cm−1, 1640 to 1650 cm−1, 1650 to 1660 cm−1, 1660

386

to 1680 cm−1 and 1680 to 1692 cm−1 were assigned to β-sheet, random coil, α-helix,

387

β-turn and β-antiparallel, respectively.43 Compared to the nanofibers by gelatin

388

electrospinning, a trend in the decreasing α-helix content and the increasing random

389

coil occurred in the fibers electrospun by the gelatin-stabilized emulsions at various φ

390

values (Table 3), indicating the conformational helix–coil transition of gelatin, in

391

good agreement with our DSC results. The β-sheet structure was predominant at a

392

high percentage in the electrospun fibers, which seemed to be inconsistent with the

393

previous work that the α-helix structure dominated the secondary structure of

394

gelatin.44 The difference may be caused by the acidic solvents used herein to dissolve 18

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 39

Page 19 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

395

gelatin, which had some adverse effect on the structural properties of protein.45 In

396

addition, the electrospinning process may also have a great impact on the protein

397

conformation. In general, the protein/peptide aggregation mainly involved β-sheet due

398

to a weaker dipole moment of β-sheet than that of α-helix.34 When the φ value was

399

increased to 0.4 or 0.6, the increase in the oil volume fraction led to a significant

400

increase in the β-sheet content, indicating the increased aggregation of gelatin

401

molecules in the electrospun fibers with higher oil fractions. This aggregation at the

402

interface was helpful to the formation of continuous fibers coating corn oil.46

403

However, a lower aggregation of gelatin may occur at φ = 0.8, which may be

404

associated with the insufficient coverage of gelatin molecules on the interface, and

405

then result in the loss of fiber morphology.

406

Encapsulation Efficiency and Storage Stability. The encapsulation efficiency of

407

the emulsion-based electropun fibers was significantly increased with the increasing φ

408

value (Table 4). As the φ value increased to 0.6, the encapsulation efficiency reached

409

up to 86.86%, indicating that the emulsion-based electropun fibers have a great

410

potential to be used as a delivery vehicle. Similar results were reported by

411

Tavassoli-Kafrani, Goli, and Fathi,18 who fabricated the electrospun gelatin and

412

gelatin-crosslinked nanofibers loaded with orange essential oil, respectively. They

413

found an increase in the encapsulation efficiency of both gelatin and

414

gelatin-crosslinked nanofibers with the increasing amount of essential oil. However,

415

the highest encapsulation efficiency of the gelatin and gelatin-crosslinked nanofibers

416

was observed at the ratios of 1:1 and 1:0.74, respectively, probably due to the 19

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

417

insufficient coverage of gelatin crosslinked by tannic over the surface of oil droplets

418

at a 1:1 ratio during the emulsion formation.

419

As expected, there was no significant change in the encapsulation efficiency at

420

various φ values during 5 days. The encapsulation efficiency of fresh nanofibers (φ =

421

0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8) were 80.41, 85.85, 86.86, and 87.16%, while it became 79.89,

422

85.28, 87.16, and 87.75% after 5 days, respectively. Especially, the encapsulation

423

efficiency at φ = 0.6 showed no significant difference during 5 days. The results

424

showed the excellent storage stability of the encapsulated corn oil and the good

425

barrier effect of emulsion-based electropun fibers as wall materials. Tavassoli-Kafrani,

426

Goli, and Fathi also reported that the storage stability of orange essential oil

427

encapsulated in the electrospun gelatin fibers was more than 120 h.18

428

In this work, core-shell nanofibers were fabricated by electrospinning of corn

429

oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by gelatin. For the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions,

430

gelatin could rapidly diffuse to the newly formed water-oil interface and form the

431

steric protein-based barrier. The higher oil fraction contributed to the higher apparent

432

viscosity and modulus of elasticity, resulting in the gel-like appearance of emulsions.

433

Under high-voltage electric field, the O/W emulsions could be electrospun to form

434

core-shell nanofibers. The average diameter of electrospun fibers was increased from

435

148.9 to 311.4 nm by the increasing oil fraction (φ = 0.2 - 0.6), and the encapsulation

436

efficiency was also increased from 80.41 to 86.86%. Moreover, the nanofiber mats

437

had good storage stability and thermal decomposition stability, and thus were expect

438

to encapsulate thermosensitive or hydrophobic bioactive compounds as a 20

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 39

Page 21 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

439

controlled-release delivery vehicle.

440

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

441

We sincerely acknowledge the financial support by the National Natural Science

442

Foundation of China (Grant No. 31772013).

443

REFERENCES

444 445 446

(1)

Mendes, A. C.; Stephansen, K.; Chronakis, I. S. Electrospinning of food

proteins and polysaccharides. Food Hydrocolloids 2017, 68, 53-68. (2)

Bhushani,

J.

A.;

Anandharamakrishnan,

C.

Electrospinning

and

447

electrospraying techniques: Potential food based applications. Trends Food Sci.

448

Technol. 2014, 38, 21-33.

449

(3)

Deng, L. L.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Que, F.; Kang, X. F.; Liu, Y. Y.; Feng, F. Q.;

450

Zhang, H. Characterization of gelatin/zein nanofibers by hybrid electrospinning. Food

451

Hydrocolloids 2018, 75, 72-80.

452

(4)

Zhang, H.; Jia, X. L.; Han, F. X.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, Y. H.; Fan, Y. B.; Yuan, X.

453

Y. Dual-delivery of VEGF and PDGF by double-layered electrospun membranes for

454

blood vessel regeneration. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 2202-2212.

455

(5)

Chen, X.; Wang, J.; An, Q. Z.; Li, D. W.; Liu, P. X.; Zhu, W.; Mo, X. M.

456

Electrospun poly (l-lactic acid-co-ɛ-caprolactone) fibers loaded with heparin and

457

vascular endothelial growth factor to improve blood compatibility and endothelial

458

progenitor cell proliferation. Colloids Surf. B-Biointerfaces 2015, 128, 106-114. 21

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

459 460 461

(6)

Topuz, F.; Uyar, T. Electrospinning of gelatin with tunable fiber morphology

from round to flat/ribbon. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2017, 80, 371-378. (7)

Zamani, M.; Prabhakaran, M. P.; Ramakrishna, S. Advances in drug delivery

462

via electrospun and electrosprayed nanomaterials. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013, 8,

463

2997-3017.

464

(8)

Cai, N.; Han, C.; Luo, X.; Chen, G.; Dai, Q.; Yu, F. Fabrication of core/shell

465

nanofibers with desirable mechanical and antibacterial properties by pickering

466

emulsion electrospinning. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1-10.

467

(9)

Shin, J.; Lee, S. Encapsulation of phytoncide in nanofibers by emulsion

468

electrospinning and their antimicrobial assessment. Fibers Polym. 2018, 19(3),

469

627-634.

470

(10) Camerlo, A.; Bühlmann-Popa, A. M.; Vebert-Nardin, C.; Rossi, R. M.;

471

Fortunato, G. Environmentally controlled emulsion electrospinning for the

472

encapsulation of temperature-sensitive compounds. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49,

473

8154-8162.

474 475

(11) Arecchi, A.; Mannino, S.; Weiss, J. Electrospinning of poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibers loaded with hexadecane nanodroplets. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, 80-88.

476

(12) Spano, F.; Quarta, A.; Martelli, C.; Ottobrini, L.; Rossi, R. M.; Gigli, G.;

477

Blasi, L. Fibrous scaffolds fabricated by emulsion electrospinning: from hosting

478

capacity to in vivo biocompatibility. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 9293-303.

479

(13) Okutan, N.; Terzi, P.; Altay, F. Affecting parameters on electrospinning

480

process and characterization of electrospun gelatin nanofibers. Food Hydrocolloids 22

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 39

Page 23 of 39

481 482 483

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

2014, 39, 19-26. (14) Dickinson E. Hydrocolloids as emulsifiers and emulsion stabilizers. Food Hydrocolloids, 2009, 23(6), 1473-1482.

484

(15) Deng, L. L.; Kang, X. F.; Liu, Y. Y.; Feng, F. Q.; Zhang, H. Effects of

485

surfactants on the formation of gelatin nanofibres for controlled release of curcumin.

486

Food Chem., 2017, 231, 70-77.

487

(16) Li, H.; Wang, M.; Williams, G. R.; Wu, J.; Sun, X.; Lv, Y.; Zhu, L. M.

488

Electrospun gelatin nanofibers loaded with vitamins A and E as antibacterial wound

489

dressing materials. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 50267-50277.

490

(17) Laha, A.; Yadav, S.; Majumdar, S.; Sharma, C. S. In-vitro release study of

491

hydrophobic drug using electrospun cross-linked gelatin nanofibers. Biochem. Eng. J.

492

2016, 105, 481-488.

493

(18) Tavassoli-Kafrani, E.; Goli, S. A. H.; Fathi, M. Encapsulation of orange

494

essential oil using cross-linked electrospun gelatin nanofibers. Food Bioprocess

495

Technol. 2018, 11(2), 427-434.

496

(19) Boutin, C.; Giroux, H. J.; Paquin, P.; Britten, M. Characterization and

497

acid-induced gelation of butter oil emulsions produced from heated whey protein

498

dispersions. Int. Dairy J. 2007, 17, 696-703.

499

(20) Manoi, K.; Rizvi, S. S. Emulsification mechanisms and characterizations of

500

cold, gel-like emulsions produced from texturized whey protein concentrate. Food

501

Hydrocolloids 2009, 23, 1837-1847.

502

(21) Gu, X.; Campbell, L. J.; Euston, S. R. Effects of different oils on the 23

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 24 of 39

503

properties of soy protein isolate emulsions and gels. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 925-932.

504

(22) Dai, L.; Sun, C.; Wei, Y.; Mao, L.; Gao, Y. Characterization of Pickering

505

emulsion gels stabilized by zein/gum arabic complex colloidal nanoparticles. Food

506

Hydrocolloids 2018, 74, 239-248.

507 508

(23) Park, S.; Chung, M. G.; Yoo, B. Effect of octenylsuccinylation on rheological properties of corn starch pastes. Starch-Starke 2004, 56(9), 399-406.

509

(24) Torres, L. G.; Iturbe, R.; Snowden, M. J.; Chowdhry, B. Z.; Leharne, S. A.

510

Preparation of O/W emulsions stabilized by solid particles and their characterization

511

by oscillatory rheology. Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 302(1-3),

512

439-448.

513

(25) Dokić, L.; Krstonošić, V.; Nikolić, I. Physicochemical characteristics and

514

stability of oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by OSA starch. Food Hydrocolloids

515

2012, 29(1), 185-192.

516

(26) Miao, M.; Huang, C.; Jia, X.; Cui, S. W.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, T.

517

Physicochemical characteristics of a high molecular weight bioengineered α-D-glucan

518

from Leuconostoc citreum SK24.002. Food Hydrocolloids 2015, 50, 37-43.

519

(27) Chen, J.; Dickinson, E. Effect of surface character of filler particles on

520

rheology of heat-set whey protein emulsion gels. Colloids Surf. B-Biointerfaces 1999,

521

12, 373-381.

522

(28) Tang, C. H.; Liu, F. Cold, gel-like soy protein emulsions by

523

microfluidization:

Emulsion

characteristics,

rheological

524

properties, and gelling mechanism. Food Hydrocolloids 2013, 30, 61-72. 24

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

and

microstructural

Page 25 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

525

(29) Chivero, P.; Gohtani, S.;Yoshii, H.; Nakamura, A. Assessment of soy soluble

526

polysaccharide, gum arabic and OSA-Starch as emulsifiers for mayonnaise-like

527

emulsions. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 69, 59-66.

528

(30) Liu, F.; Tang, C. H. Soy glycinin as food-grade Pickering stabilizers: Part. III.

529

Fabrication of gel-like emulsions and their potential as sustained-release delivery

530

systems for β-carotene. Food Hydrocolloids 2016, 56, 434-444.

531

(31) Qi, H.; Hu, P.; Xu, J.; Wang, A. Encapsulation of drug reservoirs in fibers by

532

emulsion electrospinning:  Morphology characterization and preliminary release

533

assessment. Biomacromolecules, 2006, 7, 2327-2330.

534 535 536 537

(32) Gordon, V.; Marom, G.; Magdassi, S. Formation of hydrophilic nanofibers from nanoemulsions through electrospinning. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 478, 172-179. (33) Sy, J. C.; Klemm, A. S.; Shastri, V. P. Emulsion as a means of controlling electrospinning of polymers. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21(18), 1814-1819.

538

(34) Yang, Y; Li, X. H.; Qi, M. B.; Zhou, S. B.; Weng, J. Release pattern and

539

structural integrity of lysozyme encapsulated in core–sheath structured poly

540

(DL-lactide) ultrafine fibers prepared by emulsion electrospinning. Eur. J. Pharm.

541

Biopharm., 2008, 69(1), 106-116.

542

(35) Xu, X.; Zhuang, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Jing, X. Preparation of

543

core-sheath composite nanofibers by emulsion electrospinning. Macromol. Rapid

544

Commun. 2006, 27, 1637-1642.

545 546

(36) Dai, Y.; Niu, J.; Liu, J.; Yin, L.; Xu, J. In situ encapsulation of laccase in microfibers by emulsion electrospinning:

Preparation, characterization, and

25

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

547

Page 26 of 39

application. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8942-8947.

548

(37) Peña, C.; De La Caba, K. O. R. O.; Eceiza, A.; Ruseckaite, R.; Mondragon, I.

549

Enhancing water repellence and mechanical properties of gelatin films by tannin

550

addition. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 6836-6842.

551 552

(38) Zhang, Y. Z.; Venugopal, J.; Huang, Z. M.; Lim, C. T.; Ramakrishna, S. Crosslinking of the electrospun gelatin nanofibers. Polymer 2006, 47, 2911-2917.

553

(39) Bigi, A.; Cojazzi, G.; Panzavolta, S.; Rubini, K.; Roveri, N. Mechanical and

554

thermal properties of gelatin films at different degrees of glutaraldehyde crosslinking.

555

Biomaterials 2001, 22, 763-768.

556

(40) Muyonga, J. H.; Cole, C. G. B.; Duodu, K. G. Fourier transform infrared

557

(FTIR) spectroscopic study of acid soluble collagen and gelatin from skins and bones

558

of young and adult Nile perch (Lates niloticus). Food Chem. 2004, 86, 325-332.

559

(41) Vlachos,

N.;

Skopelitis,

Y.;

Psaroudaki,

M.;

Konstantinidou,

V.;

560

Chatzilazarou, A.; Tegou, E. Applications of fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy

561

to edible oils. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2006, 573, 459-465.

562

(42) Baltacıoğlu, H.; Bayındırlı, A.; Severcan, F. Secondary structure and

563

conformational change of mushroom polyphenol oxidase during thermosonication

564

treatment by using FTIR spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2017, 214, 507-514.

565

(43) Wang, X.; Xie, X.; Ren, C.; Yang, Y.; Xu, X.; Chen, X. Application of

566

molecular modelling and spectroscopic approaches for investigating binding of

567

vanillin to human serum albumin. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 705-710.

568

(44) Prystupa, D. A.; Donald, A. M. Infrared study of gelatin conformations in the 26

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 39

569

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

gel and sol states. Polym. Gels Networks 1996, 4, 87-110.

570

(45) Song, J. H.; Kim, H. E.; Kim, H. W. Production of electrospun gelatin

571

nanofiber by water-based co-solvent approach. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 2008, 19,

572

95-102.

573

(46) Lefèvre, T; Subirade, M. Formation of intermolecular β-sheet structures: a

574

phenomenon relevant to protein film structure at oil–water interfaces of emulsions. J.

575

Colloid Interface Sci., 2003, 263(1), 59-67.

576

27

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

577

Figure captions

578

Figure 1. (A) Shear-rate dependence of the viscosity of the gelatin-stabilized O/W

579

emulsions at various oil fractions (φ = 0.2 - 0.8). (B) Plots of shear stress versus shear

580

rate for the emulsions. The solid lines are the lines of best fit to the Herschel-Bulkeley

581

model. (C) Dynamic frequency sweep of the emulsions at various oil fractions (φ =

582

0.2 - 0.8). G′, solid line; G″, dashed line.

583

Figure 2. Optical micrographs for the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at (A) φ = 0.2,

584

(B) 0.4, (C) 0.6 and (D) 0.8.

585

Figure 3. SEM micrographs of nanofibers by electrospinning of (A) gelatin, and the

586

gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at (B) φ = 0.2, (C) 0.4, (D) 0.6 and (E) 0.8.

587

Figure 4. (A), (B) TEM and (C) CLSM micrographs of the core-shell nanofibers by

588

emulsion electrospinning at φ = 0.2.

589

Figure 5. (A) TGA thermogram and (B) DSC curves of nanofibers by electrospinning

590

of gelatin and the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at various oil fractions (φ = 0.2 -

591

0.8).

592

Figure 6. ATR-FTIR spectra of the gelatin-based nanofibers by emulsion

593

electrospinning at various oil fractions (φ = 0 - 0.8).

594

28

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 28 of 39

Page 29 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Table 1. Rheological parameters of the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions by Herschel-Bulkley model.

Oil fractions

σ0 (Pa)

K (Pa Sn)

n

R2

φ = 0.2

0.231

0.968

0.998

0.999

φ = 0.4

1.707

2.787

0.885

0.999

φ = 0.6

5.972

9.901

0.754

0.999

φ = 0.8

5.643

8.207

0.702

0.999

29

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 30 of 39

Table 2. The denaturation temperature (TD) and the corresponding denaturation enthalpy (ΔHD) of nanofibers by electrospinning of gelatin and the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at various oil fractions. Gelatin

φ = 0.2

φ = 0.4

φ = 0.6

φ = 0.8

TD (°C)

89.67 ± 0.58a

85.32 ± 2.21b

77.97 ± 1.67c

82.99 ± 3.21c

87.55 ± 2.48a

ΔHD° (J g−1)

289.84 ± 31.62a

179.78 ± 15.72b

109.66 ± 10.54c

100.39 ± 22.16c

64.75 ± 6.89d

30

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 31 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Table 3. The contents of secondary structures of nanofibers by electrospinning of gelatin and the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at various oil fractions. α-helix/%

β-sheet/%

β-turn/%

Random coil /%

β-antiparallel/%

Gelatin

22.62 ± 0.38a

27.22 ± 0.21b

22.40 ± 0.57b

13.57 ± 0.21b

14.19 ± 0.40a

φ = 0.2

17.65 ± 0.21b

28.51 ± 0.72b

23.09 ± 0.14ab

17.65 ± 0.46a

13.10 ± 0.98ab

φ = 0.4

14.15 ± 0.11c

45.02 ± 0.17a

18.63 ± 0.51c

18.20 ± 0.22a

4.0 ± 0.66c

φ = 0.6

14.42 ± 0.29c

44.69 ± 0.13a

19.63 ± 0.33c

17.21 ± 0.19a

4.05 ± 0.51c

φ = 0.8

17.30 ± 0.45b

28.13 ± 0.27b

24.94 ± 0.19a

17.47 ± 0.86a

12.16 ± 0.79b

Results are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation of 3 replicates. Different letters in each column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).

31

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 32 of 39

Table 4. The encapsulation efficiency and storage stability of the emulsion-based electrospun fiber mats at various oil fractions. Encapsulation efficiency (%) 0 day

1 day

3 day

5 day

φ = 0.2

80.41 ± 0.12Aa

79.92 ± 0.05Ba

79.89 ± 0.08Ba

79.89 ± 0.08Ba

φ = 0.4

85.85 ± 0.07Ab

86.10 ± 0.05Ab

85.27 ± 0.14Bb

85.28 ± 0.07Bb

φ = 0.6

86.86 ± 0.05Ac

87.13 ± 0.12Ac

86.93 ± 0.06Ac

87.16 ± 0.03Ac

φ = 0.8

87.16 ± 0.01Ac

87.12 ± 0.07Ac

86.86 ± 0.08Ac

87.75 ± 0.11Ac

The same superscript capital letters in each row represent no significant difference at p < 0.05. The same superscript small letters in each column represent no significant difference at p < 0.05.

32

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 33 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 1. (A)

(B)

(C)

33

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 2. (A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

34

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 34 of 39

Page 35 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 3. (A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

35

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 4. (A)

(B)

(C)

36

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 36 of 39

Page 37 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 5. (A)

(B)

37

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure 6.

38

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 38 of 39

Page 39 of 39

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

TOC Graphic

39

ACS Paragon Plus Environment