Manufacture and Properties of Glucomannans and ... - ACS Publications

CITI, Avenida Galicia 2, Tecnopole, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain. # CINBIO .... Published online 14 February 2017. Published in print 1...
0 downloads 0 Views 627KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UB + Fachbibliothek Chemie | (FU-Bibliothekssystem)

Review

MANUFACTURE AND PROPERTIES OF GLUCOMANNANS AND GLUCOMANNOOLIGOSACCHARIDES DERIVED FROM KONJAC AND OTHER SOURCES Belen Gómez, Beatriz Miguez, Remedios Yañez, and Jose L. Alonso J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05409 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Feb 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 19, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

MANUFACTURE

AND

PROPERTIES

OF

GLUCOMANNANS

AND

2

GLUCOMANNOOLIGOSACCHARIDES DERIVED FROM KONJAC AND OTHER SOURCES

3

Belén Gómez, Beatriz Míguez, Remedios Yáñez, José L. Alonso*

4

Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnic Building, University of Vigo (Campus Ourense). 32004

5

Ourense, Spain.

6

CITI, Avda. Galicia, nº 2, Tecnopole, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900, Ourense, Spain.

7

CINBIO, University Campus, 36.310, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.

8 9

*Corresponding author: telephone 988387233, e-mail address [email protected]

10 11

Abstract

12

Glucomannans (GM) are polymers which can be found in natural resources, such as

13

tubers, bulbs, roots, and in both hard- and softwoods. In fact, mannan-based

14

polysaccharides represent the largest hemicellulose fraction in softwoods. In addition

15

to their structural functions and their role as energy reserve, they have been assessed

16

for their healthy applications, including their role as new source of prebiotics. This

17

article summarizes the scientific literature regarding the manufacture and the

18

functional properties of GM and their hydrolysis products with a special focus on their

19

prebiotic activity.

20 21

Keywords: glucomannans, glucomannooligosaccharides, konjac, emerging prebiotics,

22

gut microbiota, health benefits.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 2 of 48

23

1. Introduction

24

The market for functional foods is continuously increasing due to the growing demand

25

for safe products with capacity for improving the human health through their regular

26

consumption. In this context, the intake of prebiotics is considered as a good strategy

27

for achieving this objective. These compounds have been recently defined as “non-

28

digestible compounds that through its metabolism by microorganisms in the gut,

29

modulate the composition and/or the activity of the gut microbiota, thus conferring

30

physiological benefit effects on the host health”.1

31

The gut microbiota constitutes a complex association of bacteria (comprising more

32

than 1000 species and around 1014 microorganisms) that gradually increase along the

33

jejunum and the ileum up to reach the maximum concentration in the colon.2 This gut

34

microbiota reflects an interrelationship between the different bacterial groups, that

35

might work together for the benefit of the host performing three essential primary

36

functions: (i) metabolic, (ii) trophic and (iii) defensive.3 In fact, there is a large list of

37

pathologies that are linked to the alteration of this intestinal microbiota, including

38

hepatic encephalopathy, diarrhoea, diabetes, obesity or colon cancer (see Table 1).4,5

39

The most widely accepted prebiotics are lactulose, inulin, fructooligosaccharides,

40

galactooligosaccharides

41

glucomannans

42

glucomannoligosaccharides or GMOS) could also play a role as prebiotics but, before,

43

they must fulfil, as for the rest of candidates, several requirements:6 i) they cannot be

44

hydrolysed or absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal tract, ii) they have to encourage

45

the development of beneficial bacteria such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, and iii)

(GM)

and and

the

human

their

milk

derived

oligosaccharides. oligomers

However,

(denoted

as

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

46

they must induce beneficial physiological effects on the host health (that have to be

47

clearly demonstrated through well conducted human trials).

48

The best-known raw material for GM and GMOS production is konjac (Amorphophallus

49

konjac), which has been employed for centuries with health purposes, although there

50

are other potential natural resources that contain these kind of components, such as

51

eastern white pine, higanbana, orchid or redwood.7 It is necessary to remark that the

52

konjac glucomannan (KGM) has been approved as a GRAS (generally recognized as

53

safe) food additive in USA and Canada and it is also accepted by the European Union as

54

emulsifier and thickener with the E-number E425.7

55

Research studies on GM are limited and especially focused on its production from

56

konjac and on both its structural characteristics and physical properties.8–12 However,

57

other properties such as the impact of this polysaccharide and its derived oligomers on

58

human intestinal microbiota have not been yet deeply investigated.

59

In order to contribute to the development of new mannan-derived prebiotics, this

60

article summarizes the scientific literature regarding specially the manufacture and the

61

biological properties of GM and their derived oligosaccharides.

62 63

2. Basic structure and composition of mannans

64

Four types of mannan polysaccharides can be distinguished: pure mannan,

65

glucomannan, galactomannan and galactoglucomannan. These carbohydrates are

66

widespread in nature and are considered as one of the major components of

67

hemicellulose in the cell wall plants. They can be linear or branched polymers

68

consisting of mannose, galactose and glucose, as well as acetyl substituents. The

69

degree of acetylation and also the mannose to glucose ratio are parameters that 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 4 of 48

70

depend on the raw material and affect the functionality of the polysaccharide. The

71

typical structure of GM is shown in Figure 1.

72

It is widely accepted that the presence of acetyl groups in the GM backbone, as well as

73

glucuronic acid and phosphoric acid groups, confer solubility in aqueous solution.

74

Thereby, the deacetylation of the chain by treatments with alkalis is responsible of

75

their insolubility and the formation of thermally stable gels.13

76

Katsuraya et al. (2003)9 reported that the main chain of KGM is made up by (1,4)-

77

linked D-mannose and D-glucose sugars, with side chains at C-3 position of both D-

78

glucosyl and D-mannosyl residues. Specifically, they indicated that the degree of

79

branching is about 8%. On the other hand, Chen et al. (2013)14 indicated that the

80

branch chains, made up of about 3 or 4 monomers, are linked to either the C-3 or the

81

C-6 hydroxyl groups of the main chain. On the other hand, the molecular weight of

82

KGM can vary in the range 200-2000 kDa, depending on the cultivars, origin,

83

production methods or storage.15 Tester and Al-Ghazzewi (2016)7 reported that the DP

84

of glucomannans is > 200 (except for eastern white pine and redwood). Meanwhile,

85

galactoglucomannan is one of the major components in softwood hemicelluloses (it

86

accounts for 10-25% of the wood weight), although it can also be found in lower

87

amounts in hardwoods.16–18 Galactoglucomannan backbone consists of a random

88

sequence of glucose and mannose molecules joined by links β-(1-4), and galactose

89

branches joined through β-(1-6) links to the mannose units from the backbone. On the

90

other hand, galactomannan is made up by a main chain of mannose units linked by β-

91

(1-4) links and galactose side chains linked by β- (1-6).19

92

Mannans are structural elements in plant cell walls, exhibit a storage function as non-

93

starch carbohydrate reserve and provide resistance to mechanical damage. In addition, 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

94

some heteromannans are widely used as stabilizing, thickening and gelling agents in

95

the food industry.20 GM is characterized by its exceptional gelling properties and high

96

viscosity. In fact its aqueous solution is considered the most viscous among the natural

97

colloidal solutions.15 Moreover, it can be used as a source of dietary fibre and a

98

complement for weight loss. However, the highly depolymerized GM do not seem to

99

be effective for weight reduction because it does not swell or form gels like native GM

100

when hydrated.21

101 102

3. GM industrial production

103

The industrial processes to obtain GM usually employ Amorphophallus konjac as the

104

main source and consist of a sequence of stages which include washing, slicing into

105

chips and drying steps. Then, according to Chua et al. (2010),22 the dried chips are

106

pulverized, and the common konjac flour (food grade) is obtained after removing

107

impurities such as starch, protein, cellulose and low molecular weight sugars from the

108

crude pulverized flour, either by wind shifting or by alcohol precipitation.23,24 The latter

109

involves several ethanol washing steps to remove low molecular weight sugars (such

110

as D-glucose and D-fructose), a process followed by an aqueous extraction at room

111

temperature.23

112

It is important to remark that the extraction method can strongly affect the yield, the

113

molecular weight and the structure of the resulting mannans, as it was observed by

114

Lundqvist et al. (2003)25 by comparing several methods for galactoglucomannan

115

production from spruce (Picea abies).

116 117

4. GMOS manufacture and characterization 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 6 of 48

118

Glucomannan polysaccharides have many uses as native polymers, requiring different

119

purity degrees depending on the application. For example, a flour with the highest

120

glucomannan content is used in nutraceutical applications.26 However, this polymer

121

can also be hydrolysed to give low molecular-weight saccharides by a variety of

122

strategies.27

123 124

4.1. GMOS Production

125

A variety of techniques (including enzymatic, chemical or physical treatments) have

126

been assayed for manufacturing GMOS mixtures from mannans (see Table 2), being

127

the enzymatic route the most employed due to: a) its better selectivity towards the

128

type of polymer and links and ii) the use of mild conditions of temperature and

129

pressure, reducing the equipment and operation costs.

130

The two major plant mannan-degrading enzymes are mannan endo-1,4-β-

131

mannosidase or 1,4-β-D-mannan mannanohydrolase (commonly known as β-

132

mannanase) and β-D-mannoside mannohydrolase or β-mannosidase.20

133

He et al. (2001)38 used β-mannanase from Bacillus licheniformis for hydrolyzing konjac-

134

derived powder and they correlated the initial substrate, enzyme concentrations and

135

the reaction time with the degree of hydrolysis, obtaining a good agreement between

136

predicted and experimental data. The β-mannanase was also employed by Chen et al.

137

(2013)14 to produce GMOS from konjac tubers achieving high yields. Moreover, dimers

138

and trimers were obtained from KGM by enzymatic hydrolysis using cellulase and β-

139

mannanase.8 Meanwhile, Mikkelson et al. (2013)39 described the production of GMOS

140

with DP 2-6 by enzymatic hydrolysis of KGM using two T. reesei endoglucanases and

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

141

one mannanase and stated that these oligosaccharides (with defined structure) are

142

susceptible to be used as substrates in bioactivity assays.

143

Other current enzymatic studies on GM were reported by Zhang et al. (2009),40 who

144

incubated 10 mg/ml of konjac flour with 10 U/mg of MAN5 enzyme at 50°C for 24 h,

145

hydrolysing more than 90% polysaccharides in the konjac flour solution into

146

oligosaccharides and some monosaccharides; Albrecht et al. (2011),41 who investigated

147

the action of enzymes from faecal bacteria on KGM and compared the

148

oligosaccharides produced to the oligosaccharides obtained from KGM by the action of

149

fungal endo-β-(1,4)-glucanase or endo-β-(1,4)-mannanase; and Liu et al. (2015)37 that

150

investigated the factors affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of KGM using β-mannanase

151

and reported the optimum conditions (t=2 h, T=50°C, pH=6 and enzyme charge=150

152

U/g).

153

On the other hand, acids can also be used for GM degradation. Chen et al. (2005)42

154

obtained partially hydrolysed KGM by a treatment with 0.2 N HCL after boiling for 20

155

min, and Rivas et al. (2012)34 subjected samples of Pinus pinaster wood to

156

hydrothermal processing (a reaction catalysed by hydronium ions coming from water

157

ionization and from in situ generated acids) under optimum conditions (175°C, 26 min)

158

and obtained liquors with high contents of oligomers and polymers derived from

159

mannans with a minimal generation of sugars and sugar degradation compounds.

160

Other methods that have been assayed for obtaining oligosaccharides by

161

depolymerisation of GM are oxidative degradation, physical treatments and ϒ-

162

irradiation. In particular, the combination of ϒ-irradiation and β-mannanase was an

163

efficient method to obtain konjac oligosaccharides with molecular mass lower than

164

2200 Da.35 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 8 of 48

165 166

4.2. Purification and fractionation of GMOS

167

During the oligomer production (mainly by chemical or physical methods), a variety of

168

unwanted compounds, such as monosaccharides, extractives, and/ or sugar

169

decomposition products, among others, can be generated in the reaction medium.

170

When the final objective is to use these products as food ingredients for human

171

nutrition, the obtained liquors obtained must be refined.

172

In spite of the limited studies regarding GMOS purification, it can be stated that

173

membrane technology is the most employed and suitable technique for the

174

purification of these oligosaccharide mixtures. Besides being a simple technology, the

175

use of membranes offers numerous advantages such as: high-energy efficiency, no

176

harmful organic solvents are employed, it allows modify the operating conditions (such

177

as pressure, temperature, agitation or feed rate), it does not require too much space

178

and its scale up is relatively easy. 43,44

179

Rivas et al. (2012)34 subjected liquors obtained from Pinus pinaster wood by

180

hydrothermal processing to a two-step discontinuous diafiltration using regenerated

181

cellulose membranes of 5 and 1 kDa cutoff (Millipore) with a filtration area of 41.8 ×

182

10-4 m2 and an operating pressure of 4 bars for refining and fractionating their

183

hemicellulose-derived

184

glucomannan or galactoglucomannan breakdown, substituted with one or more acetyl

185

groups) obtaining two streams with different molecular mass distribution (GMOS 1, >5

186

kDa and GMOS 2, 1-5 kDa) and high purity (97.5 and 100%), which compared well to

187

the commercial prebiotics. Likewise, Jian et al. (2013)35 used ultrafiltration to

188

fractionate konjac oligosaccharides, operating successively with membrane separating

oligosaccharides

(mainly

made

up

of

hexoses

from

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

189

devices (Shanghai Shiyuan biological engineering equipment Co., Ltd., China), with the

190

Centramate Tseries cassette membrane (Pall Corporation, USA), from a maximum

191

molecular weight cut-off (3x105 Da) to a minimum one (1x103 Da), obtaining 6

192

fractions with different molecular mass range (Group 1, >300 kDa; Group 2, 100-300

193

kDa; Group 3, 50-100 kDa; Group 4, 5-50 kDa; Group 5, 1-5 kDa; and Group 6,