Minimizing Scale Formation in Saline Water Evaporators

tened in a novel fluidized bed, and the ion ex- ... when raw sea water was fed. The ion exchange ... recycle. C a S 0 4 scale limits the design of vir...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
3 Minimizing Scale Formation in Saline Water Evaporators W.

F. McILHENNY

Texas Inorganic Research, The Dow Chemical Co., Freeport, Tex.

T e m p e r a t u r e s a n d concentrations of saline w a t e r

Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

evaporators

a r e n o w limited

calcium sulfate scale. ing

has b e e n

b y the p o t e n t i a l

Partial ion e x c h a n g e soften-

demonstrated

to b e effective

m i n i m i z i n g scale f o r m a t i o n .

in

S e a w a t e r w a s sof-

t e n e d in a n o v e l fluidized b e d , a n d t h e ion e x change

resin

regenerated

b y the concentrated

e v a p o r a t o r b l o w d o w n brine. generant was required.

No additional re-

The rate of scaling d u r -

ing a 1 0 0 0 - h o u r pilot plant test on s o f t e n e d s e a w a t e r w a s less t h a n o n e thirteenth that when raw sea water was fed. equilibria

in the C a + — M g + — N a + 2

found

The ion e x c h a n g e 2

system a r e

p r e s e n t e d a n d a m e t h o d of calculation f o r the t e r n a r y system is indicated.

T he formation of scale has always been a problem i n the production of fresh water from sea water. A s water is removed, the dissolved salts concentrate i n the brine until the limit of solubility is reached for some compounds. These precipitate and form scale, especially on any heat transfer surfaces, rapidly causing a loss i n thermal efficiency, a n d if they are not removed, eventually result i n deterioration of the equipment. N o entirely satisfactory method has been proved for the control of all scales. C a C 0 and M g ( O H ) m a y be controlled b y addition of acid, or b y a sludge recycle. C a S 0 scale limits the design of virtually all sea water conversion equipment as well as equipment designed for many other saline or brackish waters. T h e only proved method has been to halt the concentration before C a S 0 becomes insoluble. W h e n magnesium and calcium are removed from sea water, a softer sea water is produced. W h e n used as a feed to a sea water evaporator i n place of ordinary raw sea water, this can be evaporated at higher temperatures to greater concentrations. Evaporator thermal efficiency and on-stream time can be increased and evaporation capital can be reduced. The incoming raw sea water can be softened b y a cation resin, and the concentrated evaporator b l o w d o w n liquor can be used as the sole regenerant for the ion exchange resin. N o additional regenerant is ordinarily required. 3

2

4

4

40

Saline Water Conversion—II Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1963.

3. MclLHENNY

Minimizing

Scale

in

Evaporators

41

A pilot plant embodying these ideas, i n an unusual method of softening, was designed and constructed by the Texas Division of The D o w C h e m i c a l C o . T w o 4000-gallon-per-day vapor compression evaporators were furnished for the testing program b y the Bureau of Yards and Docks, U n i t e d States N a v y . The Office of Saline Water furnished, under a research contract, the operating funds for a 9month testing program. The estimated cost of softening the evaporator feed at a rate of 10,000,000 gallons per day is 9.4 cents per thousand gallons.

Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

Scale Formation Scales found i n sea water evaporators are of two types: that formed when the bicarbonate breaks d o w n and that produced when the limit of solubility of the dissolved compounds is exceeded. The alkalinity i n sea water is almost entirely due to bicarbonate. W h e n the sea water is heated, the bicarbonate breaks down to produce carbon dioxide and carbonate ion. The carbonate can further disproportionate to produce carbon dioxide and hydroxyl ion. The carbonate can react w i t h the dissolved calcium to precipitate calcium carbonate when the solubility is exceeded at the concentrations, temperatures, and pressures at w h i c h the evaporation is conducted. Dissolved magnesium can react w i t h the hydroxyl ion to precipitate magnesium hydroxide. C a C 0 scales predominate below 185° F . and M g ( O H ) scales above this temperature. C a l c i u m sulfate scale can form when the solubility limit is exceeded i n the sea water evaporator. This scale is formed only by the concentration of the brine as distillate is removed and by the decrease i n solubility as the temperature of the solution is raised. W . L . Badger and Associates have published a review of literature on the formation and prevention of scale (2). Little is k n o w n about the solubilities of the scale-forming components and the crystal phases usually encountered are not those expected on the basis of equilibrium considerations (1). 3

2

2

3

5 7 I O Sulfate

20

(lOOOmg/L

30

50

Par U n i t )

Figure 1. Stability diagrams and evaporation paths of CaSO^ in sea water Saline Water Conversion—II Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1963.

A D V A N C E S IN CHEMISTRY SERIES

42

C a l c i u m sulfate has several crystal forms, but only three can exist i n solutions. Gypsum ( C a S 0 . 2 H 0 ) is the stable form at lower temperatures, and anhydrite ( C a S 0 ) at higher temperatures. However, anhydrite is so difficult to crystallize that alpha-hemihydrate ( C a S 0 . / H 0 ) can exist for long periods and is the form ordinarily encountered i n sea water evaporators. The stability diagram for C a S 0 . / H 0 is shown i n Figure 1. Plotted are the solubility lines at 2 0 0 ° , 2 1 6 ° , and 2 4 0 ° F . N o r m a l sea water can be concentrated to its original concentration without hemihydrate precipitation at the atmospheric boiling point. The potential scale concept of Standiford and Sinek is very useful (7). If it is assumed that hemihydrate is the stable C a S 0 phase, and that the H C 0 alkalinity has broken down completely into C 0 or O H , then the amount of the scaling compounds that cannot be carried i n solution can be calculated as the concentration is increased. Figure 2 is the potential scale expected when normal sea water is concentrated. 4

2

4

1

4

4

1

2

2

2

2

4

Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

3

1

2 Times

Normal

3

2

-

-

3 Concentration

Figure 2.

-

4 Factor Sea

Water

Potential scale from normal sea water Redrawn from (1)

Proved methods are available for preventing the formation of M g ( O H ) and C a C O (those scales due to alkalinity) on heat transfer surfaces. A c i d w i l l neutralize the alkalinity and b y p H control prevent the alkaline scales from forming (2, 3, 7, 8). Contact stabilization has been used to minimize alkaline scale formation (4, 6). A sludge recycle process has been successful i n preventing M g ( O H ) formation (2,7). The present work utilizes two concepts. If the concentration of either C a + or S 0 can be decreased, the resultant solution can be concentrated until the 2

s

2

2

4

- 2

Saline Water Conversion—II Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1963.

Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

3. MclLHENNY

Minimizing

Scale

in

Evaporators

43

solubility product is reached at the temperatures and pressures of the evaporation. It is neither necessary nor desirable to remove all of the calcium, only that portion required to maintain less than saturation conditions after evaporation. The calcium may be removed from sea water by chemical methods w h i c h leave relatively intact the nontroublesome magnesium content ( 5 ) . A n ion exchange removal of the calcium can use the evaporator b l o w d o w n brine as a regenerant, if there is sufficient difference i n selectivity between the resin and the solution at the concentrations of the incoming feed water and outgoing brine solution. Because the sea water obtained i n Freeport, as i n many other estuarial locations, varies in salinity, a standard must be set against w h i c h the concentrations are measured both i n the diluted sea water and in the concentrated brine. " N o r m a l sea water" as prepared by the Hydrographic Laboratories of Copenhagen is used whenever a standard sea water is designated. It is slightly more concentrated than other standard sea waters, having a total solids concentration of 35,175 p.p.m. C a l c i u m is 408 p.p.m.; magnesium 1298; sulfate 2702; and bicarbonate 142 p.p.m. Pilot Plant A n over-all view of the pilot plant is shown i n Figure 3. The two Cleaver Brooks 200-gallon-per-hour vapor compression stills are on the left and the ion exchange softening columns on the right. The large round tank is the soft sea water buffer storage tank and the square tank i n the foreground is the evaporator brine storage tank. I n Figure 4 is shown the ion exchange softening equipment. The softening was operated i n a batch cycle and the evaporators were operated continuously. E n o u g h soft sea water was produced during a softening cycle to feed the evaporator during the pumping, washing, draining, and regeneration portion of the cycle. The manner of softening and regeneration, and the type of resin, were chosen to give maximum efficiency during each part of the cycle and to allow engineering of very large equipment with a minimum of anticipated difficulty.

Figure 3.

Over-all view of soft sea water pilot plant

Saline Water Conversion—II Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1963.

A D V A N C E S IN

Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

44

Figure 4.

CHEMISTRY SERIES

Ion exchange softening

Soft sea water pilot plant A flowsheet of the pilot plant is shown i n Figure 5. The plant was charged w i t h 15 cu. feet of Dowex 5 0 W 50-100-mesh cation exchange resin. D u r i n g softening, the r a w sea water is f e d into a 15-inch I . D . b y 15-foot contact column at the same time as a 60 volume % resin slurry. T h e Regenorant Brine Brine Storage

Distillate

Hydraulic Cyclone Va por Compression Evaporator

Contact

Soft

Column

Sea

Water

Storage DOWEX 50W( Resin Slurryz

f

J

Spent B r i n e to Waste

Figure 5.

Flowsheet of soft sea water pilot plant

Saline Water Conversion—II Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1963.

3. MclLHENNY

Minimizing

Scale

in

Evaporators

45

Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

sea water and resin flow concurrently through the contact column into a 4-inch hydraulic cyclone, where they are separated, the resin is returned to softening, and the softened sea water is forwarded for storage before evaporation. The columnar flow is 30 to 40 gallons per minute per square foot, m u c h above the carryover velocity of the resin, and m u c h above the flow rates used for conventional water softening. T h e cyclone removes more than 9 9 % of the resin fed. Softening is continued for a specified time (usually 35 minutes). T h e spent resin slurry is then p u m p e d into the contact column and the column drained to bed level. Regenerant from the evaporator is fed through a sparger and removed at the bottom through a porous bonded coke resin filter support. Regenerant flows are low, about 1 to 1.5 gallons per minute per square foot, the hydraulic head furnishing the only drive. The regeneration time averaged 100 minutes. After regeneration, the bed is washed downflow w i t h raw sea water until the brine is displaced. The resin is slurried and pumped into the storage tank for the next softening. The total cycle time was about 4 hours. A typical softening profile is shown i n Figure 6. A t the end of softening, the resin still has the ability to remove calcium, but the time and flows are balanced to give an average water of the desired degree of calcium removal. A l t h o u g h not necessary for scale prevention, some magnesium is removed b y the resin from the incoming sea water. Because of the greater selectivity of the resin for calcium, the proportional removal of the calcium fed is larger.

Softening

Figure 6.

Time in Minutes

Typical softening profile

A fluidized resin-liquid contact was chosen for several reasons. T u r b i d i t y in the incoming sea water presents no problem, because the suspended material is carried over w i t h the softened sea water. It is difficult, if not impossible, to force raw sea water through an ion exchange resin bed at reasonable flow rates because of the rapid b u i l d u p of a sludge blanket i n the top few inches of the bed, which results in a rapid increase i n pressure drop. A fixed bed downflow regeneration was chosen because the amount of regenerant is limited to that produced by the evaporation of the softened sea water. A fixed bed gives the maximum possible contact and the use of finemesh resin gives a large number of transfer units and allows a close approach to the equilibrium. A low flow rate was used i n the pilot plant. A typical regeneration wave is shown i n Figure 7. Because the resin is w e l l mixed during the softening and p u m p i n g , the adsorbed calcium is evenly dispersed Saline Water Conversion—II Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1963.

46

A D V A N C E S IN

CHEMISTRY SERIES

Normality Ca

+

+

Mg* ro.7

Regenerant

+

p

Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

0

Wash *~

0.5

1.0

1.5

Effluent

Figure 7.

2.0 Bed

2.5

3.0

3.5

Volumes

Typical regeneration wave

in the b e d at the beginning of regeneration. W h e n the regeneration wave moves downflow through the b e d , the calcium is continually being eluted i n the waste stream and does not peak i n as high a concentration as it w o u l d if the calcium were concentrated i n a portion of the bed. Such an elution is desirable because of the high sulfate content of the regenerant brine, w h i c h leads to supersaturation of the effluent wave w i t h calcium sulfate. Since the regenerant effluent calcium is spread more evenly i n the waste, the local supersaturation is not as high as w o u l d be encountered i n more conventional fixed bed elution, either upflow or downflow. A t the peak removal of calcium, the effluent is supersaturated w i t h gypsum, w h i c h w i l l precipitate after removal from the bed. T h e dashed line i n Figure 7 shows the calcium level reached after standing for one week. Undisturbed samples became opalescent, indicating precipitation, about an hour after sampling. In spite of the gypsum supersaturation, no trouble was ever experienced with precipitation i n the b e d , i n the porous carbon bed support, or i n the effluent piping from the pilot plant. Dowex 50W Resin Stability The pilot plant was initially charged w i t h 15 c u . feet of Dowex 5 0 W 50-100mesh N a + form cation exchange resin. D u r i n g the 9 months of operation, 10 c u . feet were added. Resin was sampled daily and the particle size was followed microscopically. Figure 8 is a plot of the 5 0 % b y count particle diameter as a function of cycle number. There was no significant change i n either average particle size or number of broken beads during the period of pilot plant operation. The resin, w h i c h is initially light i n color, became dark brown i n service as iron was picked up from the m i l d steel equipment and incoming sea water and retained. However, calcium removal capacity d i d not appreciably decline during the testing period. T h e iron is readily stripped b y H C l and the resin returned to its original color. Some resin was lost to drain w h e n the crackerjack filter cracked and lost the seal to the metal column. This was repaired and no further resin was lost to waste. T h e greater majority of resin was lost through the packing of the W e m c o pump. B y the end of the 1000-hour r u n , the pump shaft was grooved and leaked continuously i n spite of being repacked daily. Most of the spilled resin was Saline Water Conversion—II Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1963.

3. MclLHENNY

47

Minimizing Stale in Evaporators

Number of Broken Beads Per 6

100 Beadt

Counttd

-

5 4 3



2 I





• • • •



















Average Bead Olameter Mllllmetert

0.4

Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

0.3 0.2 0.1

40

J

80

i

120

i

160

i

200

i

240

Cycle

Figure 8.

I

280

I

320

I

360

I

400

I

440

I

480

i

920

1

360

1

600

Number

Dowex 50W particle size during pilot plant operation

picked up, washed, screened, and returned to the system. Pump leakage would account for almost all of the resin lost from the system. Both the new and used ion exchange resins were analyzed for operating capacity, leakage, sphericity, and particle size (Table I). The resin showed no apparent physical degradation in the 9 months of use. Table I.

Ion Exchange Resin Properties New

Operating capacity, kgr./cu. ft. Leakage, grains Wet volume total capacity, H , meq./ml. Dry weight capacity, H , meq./dry gram Sphericity

30.5 0.77

+

+

99.0

Used 29.8 0.76 1.95 4.90 95.0

The finer mesh resin was chosen because the fine beads are sulfonated without strains and the resin is physically more stable to attrition than is a standard water softening mesh size resin. The ion exchange kinetics are also more rapid, 70-mesh resin reaching 90% of calcium equilibrium in 1 minute as compared with almost 10 minutes for a 20-mesh resin.

Jon Exchange Equilibria The ternary ion exchange system of interest is:

Vt M g S + N a R ±+ Vi M g R + NaS Vt CaS + N a R ±=s Vt C a R + NaS Vt CaS + V* M g R ± 5 V« C a R + Vt M g S " L(Af)J

(«•)

Saline Water Conversion—II A. C. S. Editorial Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Library Washington, DC, 1963.

A D V A N C E S IN CHEMISTRY SERIES

48

where X = equivalent fraction ion on the resin ^ X = 1 X = equivalent fraction ion i n the solution 5 X = 1 ^Na selectivity coefficient (superscript is the preferred ion on the resin) R

R

s

S

=

Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

E a c h of the three ions is competing for sites on the resin and none c a n be ignored when an equilibrium is to be calculated. Selectivity coefficients of the type shown are used to calculate equilibriums. T h e resin and solution activities are included i n the coefficient, as are the solution concentration, w h i c h varies widely, and the total ionic concentration on the resin, w h i c h varies slightly on a volume basis. The sum of equivalent fractions of ions on the solution and on the resin is equal to unity i n each case. The variation of the equilibria i n the system D o w e x 50 r e s i n - C a - M g - N a is shown i n Figure 9. T h e two divalent-monovalent exchanges are concentrationdependent. The divalent-divalent exchange is not.

0.1

0.2

03

0.5

Total

Figure 9.

0.7

I

Solution

2

3

4

Normality

Ion exchange equilibria

Ca *-Mg -Na -Dowex SOW +

+2

+

If either the solution composition or the resin composition is k n o w n and the total solution concentration is given, the composition of the other phase may be calculated. U s i n g N a as the base i o n : S X = 1 R

Then: where A =

=

- l

+ V i + 4^ 2A [f£y + (*5S)» 2

and X? - (K§17 g|J

(Xg')

[jfy

2

2

The equilibrium diagram for the sea water-resin-evaporator brine system constructed from the above data is shown i n Figure 10, i n w h i c h the calcium equivalent fraction on the resin is plotted against the calcium equivalent fraction i n Saline Water Conversion—II Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1963.

3.

MclLHENNY

Minimizing

o.oi

Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

in

Evaporators

0.02

Equivalent

Figure 10.

Scale

Fraction Ca

49

0.03 in

Solution

Equilibrium diagram of sea water softening

solution. D u r i n g softening the resin picks u p calcium from point A to point B. The resin is then exposed to the concentrated brine b l o w n down from the evaporator at point C and gives u p calcium to the regenerant to point D. Because there is no precipitation i n the evaporator, the soft sea water and influent regenerant have the same ionic ratios. W h e n equilibrium is reached between the softening ability of the resin and the removal ability of the brine, the ratio of calcium to total ions i n the effluent solution at point C must equal or exceed the ionic ratio i n the incoming raw sea water. Flows must be balanced, since no additional regenerant is used and the amount removed from the water b y the resin must equal the amount removed by the brine from the resin. Operating Results The pilot plant was designed a n d operated to remove about 5 0 % of the calcium from the sea water when the evaporator was operating at a b l o w d o w n concentration four times that of normal sea water. This chosen calcium removal level was sufficient to keep the calcium concentration below that needed to prevent hemihydrate precipitation at the evaporator temperature. The evaporator was operated to maintain a constant vapor head pressure at zero-pound gage, w h i c h kept the brine at the atmospheric boiling point.

0

0.3

0.4 Total

Figure 11.

0.5

0.6

Normality

Removal of calcium and magnesium from sea waters

Saline Water Conversion—II Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1963.

A D V A N C E S IN

Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

50

CHEMISTRY SERIES

T h e flows and cycle timing were arranged to use all of the evaporator blowdown brine to regenerate the resin. D u r i n g the entire 9 months of operation, additional salt was added only twice, both times to prepare a synthetic brine to start up the system. The most important single variable determining the calcium removal is the salinity of the incoming sea water. I n Figure 11 is shown the removal of calcium and magnesium as the sea water concentration is varied. D u r i n g the testing period, the total normality of the received sea water varied from 0.3 to 0.5, which meant that, at times, the evaporator was concentrating the feed sea water as much as 7 times to reach the desired brine concentration. Three long-term test runs were made w i t h the pilot plant, all at a brine concentration of about four times normal sea water. T h e first run was with raw sea water, the second w i t h softened sea water with no acid addition, and the third w i t h softened sea water treated w i t h acid to remove alkalinity. These are shown in Figure 12.

3

I

1

1

I

2

1 3

I 4

Hundred

Figure 12.

I 5 Hours

I 6 of

I 7

I 8

I 9

I 10

Operation

Increase in evaporator pressure difference with time of operation

W h e n raw sea water was fed to the vapor compression evaporators the 6-p.s.i. cutoff pressure differential was exceeded in 150 hours. M g ( O H ) and C a S 0 . / H 0 were found by x-ray analysis in the tube scale samples. The evaporation path for raw sea water as shown i n Figure 1 indicated that C a S 0 . / H 0 precipitation was expected and d i d occur. W h e n softened sea water was fed to the evaporators without acid to neutralize the alkalinity, M g ( O H ) was expected and was found. The rate of scaling was one quarter that found with raw sea water. W h e n softened sea water was fed to the evaporators with the addition of hydrochloric acid to remove the alkalinity, the rate of scaling was one thirteenth that found w i t h raw sea water. There was some increase in pressure differential, but tube scale samples showed no M g ( O H ) or C a S 0 i n any form. D u r i n g the raw sea water run, the evaporator foamed very badly and antifoam had to be added almost continuously to allow operation of any sort. N o foaming was encountered with soft sea water, although, except for softening, the feeds were identical. 2

1

2

4

2

1

2

2

4

Saline Water Conversion—II Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1963.

2

2

3. MclLHENNY

Minimizing

Scale

in

Evaporators

51

A cost estimate indicates that at 1961 equipment and labor prices, the softening w o u l d cost 9.4 cents per 1000 gallons of distillate at a rate of 10,000,000 gallons per day. A l l of this cost is capital, maintenance, and labor. A minimum resin make-up is the only chemical requirement for the ion exchange softening. The cost of softening does not include the acid feed necessary to control deposition ofMg(OH) . For a reduction i n the total cost of fresh water from sea water, the cost of the sea water softening would, of course, have to be balanced b y a decrease i n evaporator capital or a decrease i n operating cost b y increasing on-stream time, or b y decreasing evaporator efficiency b y the higher allowable evaporative temperatures. Some saline waters have calcium sulfate scaling problems even more difficult than those of sea water. T h e partial ion exchange softening should allow operation at temperatures and pressures that up to now have not been possible. Downloaded by UNIV OF IOWA on June 22, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: January 1, 1963 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch003

2

Literature Cited ( 1 ) B a d g e r Associates, Inc., W. L., Office of Saline W a t e r , U. S. D e p t . C o m m e r c e , R a n d D R e p t . 26, O T S P u b l . 161290 ( 1 9 5 9 ) . ( 2 ) Ibid., P B 161399 ( D e c e m b e r 1 9 5 9 ) . ( 3 ) H i l l i e r , H., Ling, F. B . , U. S. Patent 2,733,196 ( J a n . 3 1 , 1 9 5 6 ) . (4) L a n g e l i e r , W. F., et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. 42, 126 ( 1 9 5 0 ) . ( 5 ) M c I l h e n n y , W. F., et al., U. S. Patent 2,772,143 ( N o v . 11, 1 9 5 6 ) . ( 6 ) S p a u l d i n g , C . H., L i n d s t e n , D. C., Office of T e c h n i c a l Services, U. S. D e p t . C o m merce, P B 111569 ( 1 9 5 3 ) . (7) Standiford, F . C., Sinek, J . R . , Chem. Eng. Progr. 57, 59 ( 1 9 6 1 ) . (8) W i l l i a m s , J . S., Rept. R - 0 1 1 , U. S. N a v a l C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g L a b o r a t o r y , Port Hueneme, Calif. R E C E I V E D June 18, 1962.

Saline Water Conversion—II Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1963.