Subscriber access provided by UQ Library
Article
Selenium bioaccessibility and speciation in selenium-enriched lettuce: investigation of the selenocompounds liberated after in vitro simulated human digestion using two-dimensional HPLC-ICP-MS Emanueli DO NASCIMENTO DA SILVA, Federica AURELI, Marilena D'AMATO, Andrea RAGGI, Solange CADORE, and Francesco CUBADDA J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 27 Mar 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 27, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Title
2
Selenium bioaccessibility and speciation in selenium-enriched lettuce:
3
investigation of the selenocompounds liberated after in vitro simulated human
4
digestion using two-dimensional HPLC-ICP-MS
5
Running title
6
Selenium bioaccessibility and speciation in selenium-enriched lettuce
7
Authors
8
Emanueli DO NASCIMENTO DA SILVAa, Federica AURELIb, Marilena D’AMATOb, Andrea RAGGIb,
9
Solange CADOREa, Francesco CUBADDAb*
10
Affiliations
11
a
Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, CEP 6154, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil
12
b
Department of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità-
13
14
Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
* Corresponding author
15
Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
16
e-mail:
[email protected] 17
phone +39 06 49906024
18
fax +39 06 49902540
19
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
20
Abstract
21
The evaluation of selenium-enriched vegetables as potential dietary sources of selenium, an
22
essential element for humans, requires an assessment of the plant accumulation ability as well as of
23
the bioaccessibility and speciation of the accumulated selenium, which influence its biological
24
effects in humans. Lettuce hydroponically grown at three selenite (SeVI)/selenate (SeIV)
25
amendment levels was characterized accordingly. Selenium accumulation in lettuce leaves was
26
greatest with Se(VI) amendment, whereas bioaccessibility was 70% on average in both cases.
27
Selenium speciation in gastrointestinal hydrolysates, characterized by anion and cation exchange
28
HPLC-ICP-MS, showed that Se(IV) was largely biotransformed into organoselenium metabolites,
29
with selenomethionine accounting for 1/3 of the total detected species, whereas Se(VI) was
30
incorporated as such in the edible portion of the plant, with only a small fraction (~20%) converted
31
into organic species. Taking into account both nutritional quality and safety, the Se(IV)-enriched
32
lettuce appeared more favourable as potential selenium source for human consumption.
33
Keywords: selenium, food, speciation, in vitro simulated digestion, biofortification, human health
34
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 31
Page 3 of 31
35
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1 Introduction
36
Selenium is an essential element in humans, being needed as L-selenocysteine (SeCys) for the
37
synthesis of selenoproteins and found as such in the active centre of a number of selenoprotein
38
enzymes.1 Iodothyronine deiodinases, glutathione peroxidases (GPxs), thioredoxin reductases, and
39
selenoprotein P (SEPP1) are important selenoproteins that have a variety of functions, including
40
antioxidant effects, T-cell immunity, thyroid hormone metabolism, selenium homeostasis and
41
transport, and skeletal and cardiac muscle metabolism.2 Insufficient or sup-optimal selenium intakes
42
may cause a range of detrimental effects on human health and the relationships between selenium
43
intake/status and various health outcomes, e.g. gastrointestinal and prostate cancer, cardiovascular
44
disease, diabetes, male fertility, have been intensively investigated in the last years. Evidence to
45
date suggests that selenium undernutrition may play an important role in some of these conditions
46
but since the range of intake separating deficiency and toxicity is narrow, care has to be taken in
47
identifying the optimal range for health and avoiding selenium overexposure.1,2
48
Dietary reference intakes set on the basis of the optimization of plasma GPx3 activity are
49
typically around 55 µg/day,3 whereas higher dietary intakes are necessary for the levelling off of
50
plasma SEPP1 concentration and an adequate intake of 70 µg/day for adults was set by EFSA using
51
this criterion.4 The selenium content of staple foods such as grains and vegetables depends on the
52
selenium content of the soil as well as on its geochemical characteristics, which modulate selenium
53
phytoavailability. The amount of selenium in the diet largely depends on where crops are cultivated,
54
the soil/fodder to which animals are exposed, and the actual foods consumed. Low-selenium areas
55
are present in a number of countries worldwide and therefore a large proportion of the human
56
population is thought to have sub-optimal to insufficient selenium intakes.3,5
57
L-selenomethionine (SeMet) is the predominant selenium species in almost all food sources
58
whereas SeCys is the main form of selenium in mammalian proteins and is typically found in foods
59
of animal origin.6 SeMet may unspecifically replace methionine residues in proteins, with the 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
60
resulting proteins being referred to as selenium-containing proteins, whereas SeCys constitutes a
61
specific amino acid residue in selenoproteins.1,3 Selenites (SeO32–, Se(IV)) and selenates (SeO42–,
62
Se(VI)), the most common selenium inorganic compounds, are found in water and, as minor
63
species, in most foods.1,7 In plants of the Brassica genus (e.g. broccoli) and the Allium genus (e.g.
64
onion, garlic), the non-protein selenoaminoacids Se-methylselenocysteine (MeSeCys) and γ-
65
glutamyl-Se-methylselenocysteine (γ-Glu-MeSeCys) are present and become the major species
66
when these vegetables incorporate large amount of selenium.8,9
67
Dietary selenium is generally well absorbed, but retention is higher with organic compounds
68
compared to inorganic ones.6 Se(VI) is better absorbed than Se(IV), but a significant fraction is lost
69
in the urine, whereas Se(IV) is better retained than Se(VI).10 Upon absorption, SeCys, Se(IV) and
70
Se(VI) are available for the synthesis of selenoproteins whereas SeMet can substitute for
71
methionine in proteins where it can act as a selenium store, entering the functional selenium body
72
pool to be converted to SeCys upon turnover of tissue proteins.4 At dietary levels leading to
73
excessive intakes, toxic effects of selenium are also species-related, with inorganic selenium – and
74
especially Se(IV) – being more toxic than SeMet and most organic selenocompounds.6,11 In
75
summary, the beneficial or toxic effects of selenium are not only dose-dependent, but also related to
76
the chemical form of the element and its bioavailability. Therefore selenium speciation is important
77
to have an insight into the bioavailability of dietary selenium and the relationships between intake,
78
selenium status and health outcomes.
79
Even though no selenium requirement has been shown and selenium essentiality is still
80
controversial for higher plants, plants readily take up and assimilate selenium using sulfur
81
transporters and biochemical pathways. Importantly, plant foods are the main source of dietary
82
selenium and thus plant selenium metabolism is key for selenium nutrition of humans.12-18 A
83
number of studies investigated the extent of selenium uptake and assimilation when different plant
84
species are selenium-enriched, focusing on the conversion of inorganic selenium in soil/growth
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 31
Page 5 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
85
medium into organoselenium compounds biosynthesized in plant tissues. Although Se-enrichment
86
of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) has been widely studied in either soil or hydroponic growing
87
conditions,19-28 limited and conflicting information is available on the selenium species found in the
88
edible portion of the plant.29-30 Furthermore, no information exists on selenium bioaccessibility in
89
selenium-enriched lettuce, i.e. on the selenium fraction in lettuce leaves that is solubilized after
90
human gastrointestinal digestion and becomes available for intestinal absorption.11-31
91
The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of selenium accumulation and selenium
92
bioaccessibility in lettuce hydroponically grown on Se(VI) and Se(VI) enriched substrates, and
93
characterize the selenium species released after in vitro simulated human digestion by HPLC-ICP-
94
MS. Since the use of a single chromatographic principle in HPLC-ICP-MS determination of the
95
released selenocompounds is at risk of misidentification due to the possible coelution of some of
96
them, we applied a two-dimensional approach using both anion and cation exchange HPLC-ICP-
97
MS.
98
2 Material and methods
99
2.1 Instrumentation
100
Chromatographic separations were performed using an HPLC system consisting of a Perkin-
101
Elmer Series 200 LC binary pump, an autosampler, and a column thermostat. The outlet of the
102
HPLC column was directly connected via PEEK capillary tubing to the nebulizer of the ICP-MS
103
(Nexion 350D, Perkin-Elmer, USA), which served as the selenium specific detector for both total
104
and speciation analysis. The ICP-MS instrument was equipped with a quartz concentric nebulizer
105
and a quartz cyclonic spray chamber. Chromatographic data were collected, stored, and processed
106
using the Perkin-Elmer software Chromera version 4.1.0.
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
107
Page 6 of 31
2.2 Reagents and standards
108
Deionized water obtained by a Milli-Q Element System (Millipore, France) was used
109
throughout the work. Nitric acid 68% v/v (Carlo Erba Reagenti, Italy) and hydrogen peroxide 31%
110
v/v (Merck KGaA, Germany), both ultrapure grade, were used for oxidative digestion of samples
111
and gastrointestinal hydrolysates. Calibrants and the internal standard solutions used for total
112
selenium analysis were obtained from standard certified solutions with a content of 1 mg mL-1
113
(High Purity Standard, USA), by dilution with acidified (HNO3) deionized water as necessary. For
114
speciation analysis, 1 mg mL-1 stock solutions, expressed as selenium, were prepared by dissolving
115
in water adequate amounts of selenious acid [Se(IV)], selenic acid [Se(VI)], SeMet, L-selenocystine
116
(SeCys2), and MeSeCys (all from Sigma–Aldrich, USA), methyl-selenomethionine (MeSeMet), and
117
γ-glutamyl-Se-methylselenocysteine
118
Selenohomolanthionine (SeHLan) was kindly provided by Prof. Yasumitsu Ogra. Selenomethionine
119
selenoxide (SeOMet) was prepared according to Michalska-Kacymirow et al.32 Standard stock
120
solutions were stored at 4 ºC and the exact concentrations were ascertained by ICP-MS analysis.
121
The purity of the standards was checked by HPLC-ICP-MS and no species interconversion was
122
found. Analytical-grade ammonium acetate, pyridine, formic acid 98% (Merck KgaA, Darmstadt,
123
Germany), and methanol (J.T. Baker, Deventer, The Netherlands) were used for the preparation of
124
the chromatographic mobile phases. Mobile phases were filtered through a Millipore Express Plus
125
0.22 µm membrane. Porcine enzymes (pepsin, pancreatin), α-amylase from Bacillus subtilis, bile
126
salts, KCl, and MgCl2(H2O)6, (all from Sigma–Aldrich, USA), CaCl2, (Baker Instra Analyzed,
127
Avantor Material, The Netherlands), NaCl, (NH4)CO3, KH2PO4, NaHCO3 (all from Merck KGaA,
128
Germany) were used in simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Ultrapure grade 37% v/v hydrochloric
129
acid (Carlo Erba Reagenti, Italy) and sodium hydroxide (Sigma–Aldrich, USA) were used to adjust
130
pH.
(γ-Glu-MeSeCys)
(PharmaSe,
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Lubbock,
TX).
Page 7 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
131
2.3 Procedures
132
2.3.1 Selenium-enrichment of lettuce
133
The greenhouse experiments were conducted at the School of Agricultural Engineering of the
134
University of Campinas. Seedlings of red leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L., cv. "Veneza Roxa") were
135
grown hydroponically. Each hydroponic system had four channels, each connected to 10-L vessels
136
of nutrient solution, and comprised 3-4 control or Se-enriched plants. The composition of the
137
nutrient solution (Hidrogood, Brazil) is shown in Table S1 (Supporting information). Nutrient
138
solutions were prepared so as to contain 0, 10, 25 and 40 µmol Se L-1 of either sodium selenate
139
(Na2SeO4) or sodium selenite (Na2SeO3) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), according to the design shown in
140
Table S2 (Supporting information). The solutions were constantly aerated and the pH was
141
monitored daily and adjusted between 5.5-6.5 with 6 mol L-1 NaOH or 6 mol L-1 HCl, as necessary.
142
The conductivity was maintained in the range 2.5-3.5 mS cm-1; when the value was out of this range
143
the solution was replaced. After 28 days, the plants were harvested, washed with tap and deionized
144
water, and dried in an oven at 60 °C for 72 h.
145
2.3.2 In vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion
146
Selenium bioaccessibility was assessed using a standardised static in vitro method simulating
147
human gastric and gastrointestinal digestion.33 Table S3 (Supporting information) summarizes the
148
composition of the gastrointestinal fluids used in this study and Figure S1 (Supporting information)
149
shows the overall scheme of the in vitro digestion experiments. Briefly, each batch of lettuce
150
samples was incubated for 2 minutes at 37 ºC with saliva in a mixing water bath (GFL 1083,
151
Gesellschaft für Labortechnik mbH, Burgwedel, Germany), then the gastric juice was added and the
152
samples were kept in the mixing water bath for 2 h. Another batch of samples was submitted in
153
parallel to the same procedure, but after the gastric digestion the intestinal juice was added and the
154
samples were incubated for other 2 h. The gastric and the gastrointestinal hydrolysates were
155
centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 25 min at 4 ºC. The supernatant was then collected, filtered through
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 31
156
0.45 µm membranes, divided into aliquots and stored at -80 ºC until analysis. Procedural blanks
157
were run in parallel in order to check the presence of selenium in the reagents. The in vitro
158
enzymolysis procedure was carried out in triplicate for each lettuce sample.
159
2.3.3 Total selenium analysis
160
For total selenium analysis, samples were submitted to microwave-assisted oxidative
161
digestion by means of an Ultrawave single reaction chamber (Milestone, Sorisole, Italy). For lettuce
162
samples, approximately 0.15 g of dried sample weighed into a Teflon® flask were added with 3 mL
163
of HNO3 and 1 mL of deionized water. Total selenium solubilized by gastric and gastrointestinal
164
digestion was also determined by ICP-MS. Aliquots of extracts (2 mL) were added with 1 mL of
165
HNO3, and submitted to the same digestion procedure as above. The digested samples were made
166
up to 20 mL with deionized water prior analysis. Measurements were carried out using
167
82
168
quantification. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.06 and 0.21 µg L-1, respectively.
169
The accuracy of total selenium determinations, as assessed through analysis of the reference
170
material in cabbage matrix IAEA 359 (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria), was
171
satisfactory with no statistical difference between found values (0.12 µg g-1, 95% C.I. = 0.113-0.133
172
µg g-1) and information values (0.12 µg g-1, 95% C.I. = 0.109-0.131 µg g-1).
173
2.3.4 Selenium speciation analysis
Se as analytical masses with
74
77
Se and
Ge as internal standard, and the method of standard additions for
174
The selenium species liberated by simulated gastrointestinal digestion were characterized by
175
anion exchange and cation exchange HPLC-ICP-MS. Selenocompounds in extracts were identified
176
by retention time matching with the standard substances spiked to the sample extracts. Quantitative
177
calculations were based on peak areas using external calibration or the method of standard additions
178
as appropriate, depending on sample dilution. For anion exchange separation a PRP-X100 column
179
(4.6·x 250 mm, 10 µm) equipped with a guard-column was used; the eluents were 5 mM acetate
180
buffer (pH 4.7) (A) and 150 mM acetate buffer (pH 4.7) (B), and gradient elution at 1.0 mL min-1 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
181
(0-4 min-100% A, 4-6 min-from 100% A to 15% A, 6-30 min-85% B and 15% A) was used. Fifty
182
µL of the filtered hydrolisates were injected. For cation exchange separation a Chrompack
183
IonoSpher-5C column (3.0·x 100 mm, 5 µm) equipped with guard-column was used; eluent A, i.e.
184
3% (v/v) MeOH at pH 3.0, and eluent B, i.e. 10 mM pyridinium formate with 3% (v/v) MeOH at
185
pH 3.0 - were used at 1 mL/min according to the gradient programme 0.1-3.5 min-92.5% A/7.5% B,
186
3.5-13.5 min-72% A/28% B, 13.5-16.5 min-72% A/28% B, 16.5-28 min-92.5% A/7.5% B. Twenty
187
µL of the filtered hydrolysates were injected for measurements. The chromatographic purity of the
188
anion exchange peak eluting at 2.7 min was assessed by orthogonal chromatography, i.e. collecting
189
the fraction eluting from 1.5 to 4.5 minutes and analysing it by cation exchange HPLC-ICP-MS
190
with the same conditions as above.
191
3 Results and discussion
192
3.1 Selenium accumulation in lettuce
193
There was no observable toxic effect of selenium application on lettuce plants in the
194
conditions of this study. In particular, there was no statistically significant influence of the selenium
195
form and applied concentration on plant biomass (ANOVA, p > 0.05).
196
Selenium accumulation in lettuce leaves as a function of applied selenium was quite different
197
when the latter was provided in the form of Se(IV) compared to Se(VI) (Figure 1). The selenium
198
concentrations in the edible portion of the plant resulting from the treatment with Se(VI) were much
199
higher (Table 1). The dissimilar selenium deposition observed in lettuce leaf tissue is consistent
200
with the different absorption and assimilation of Se(IV) and Se(VI) in higher plants. Se(IV) is
201
rapidly converted to organic forms, which have low mobility in the xylem and are incorporated as
202
selenoaminoacids into root proteins; in contrast, Se(VI) in roots is not easily converted to organic
203
forms and being much more mobile in the xylem it is easily transported to the aerial part of the
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
204
plant.13,15-18 This is confirmed by the high Se(VI) to total selenium ratio found in leaves of Se(VI)-
205
enriched plants (vide infra).
206
Several studies observed that lettuce leaves readily accumulate selenium - and at a greater
207
degree when supplied as Se(VI) compared to Se(IV) - as found in the present study.21,23-26 In
208
comparative studies, lettuce was found to achieve higher selenium concentrations in the edible
209
portion than other plants (e.g. radish, tomato, strawberry) under the same growing and
210
biofortification conditions; for other species (e.g. chicory and cucumber) the selenium levels were
211
comparable.19-20,22 An evaluation of 30 diverse accessions of lettuce for their capacity to accumulate
212
selenium showed an over twofold change in total selenium levels between cultivars, highlighting
213
useful variability in lettuce germplasm for optimal biofortification.25 Selenium accumulation, for
214
Se(VI) treatment, appeared to be associated with an altered expression of genes involved in
215
selenium/sulphur uptake and assimilation, whereas the stimulating effect on plant growth found in
216
some cases correlated with the activities of antioxidant enzymes.25
217
3.2 Selenium bioaccessibility in lettuce
218
The fraction of leaf selenium that was solubilized after incubation with simulated salivary
219
fluid and simulated gastric fluid (succession of the oral and gastric phases of human digestion) is
220
referred to as bioaccessible selenium after gastric digestion in this work. Se(IV)-enriched lettuce
221
had a mean gastric bioaccessibility of 32% (s.d. 2%, min-max 31-34%) whereas for Se(VI)-
222
enriched lettuce the fraction solubilized was 50% on average (s.d. 8%, min-max 43-58%), and it
223
was positively associated (r=0.978) with the magnitude of Se(VI) application (Table 1). In the non-
224
enriched lettuce, the fraction of leaf selenium solubilized amounts to an intermediate value of 42%
225
(s.d. 9%).
226
After completion of the simulated human digestion with the intestinal phase, Se(IV)-enriched
227
lettuce had a gastrointestinal bioaccessibility of 68% on average (s.d. 3%, min-max 65-71%), which
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 31
Page 11 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
228
was negatively associated (r=-0.997) with the magnitude of Se(IV) application, whereas for Se(VI)-
229
enriched lettuce the fraction solubilized is 72% on average (s.d. 6%, min-max 66-76%), and it is
230
greater (76%) for the two higher levels of Se(VI) application (Table 1).
231
The higher gastric bioaccessibility of selenium in Se(VI)-enriched plants is consistent with a
232
selenium speciation dominated by Se(VI), which is easily solubilized in the conditions of human
233
stomach digestion. On the other hand, if a substantial proportion of the total selenium is present as
234
protein-bound SeMet, the initial proteolytic hydrolysis promoted by pepsin in the gastric phase is
235
not sufficient for the release of the selenoaminoacid that requires the cleavage of peptide bonds
236
occurring during intestinal proteolysis. The latter is the case of Se(IV)-enriched plants (vide infra).
237
Irrespectively of the type of supplementation, the supplementation level and the resulting leaf
238
selenium concentration and speciation, the gastrointestinal bioaccessibility of selenium in Se-
239
enriched lettuce was satisfactory, i.e. 70% on average compared to 62% of the non-enriched lettuce.
240
This value is in the range of the levels commonly observed for selenium bioavailability (in vivo) or
241
bioaccessibility (in vitro) in plant sources.10-11,31
242
3.3 Speciation of bioaccessible selenium in lettuce
243
Figure 2 shows the anion exchange HPLC separation with ICP-MS detection of a mixture of 9
244
selenium standards. Cation exchange HPLC separation with ICP-MS detection was used as an
245
alternative chromatographic system and Figure 3 shows the HPLC-ICP-MS chromatogram of 9
246
selenium compounds of interest.
247
Analysis of the gastrointestinal hydrolysates by HPLC-ICP-MS was carried out to
248
characterize the bioaccessible selenium chemical species, i.e. the actual selenium compounds that
249
are released after simulated human gastrointestinal digestion and become available for intestinal
250
absorption. Since the retention time of some species was affected by the sample matrix, correct
251
assignment of identity as well as quantification were based on coelution with spiked authentic
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
252
standards. In addition, the samples were analysed at different dilutions and in all cases species
253
identification was substantiated by spiking the sample with the authentic standard substance.
254
Anion exchange HPLC-ICP-MS revealed that at least twelve chemical species were present in
255
the case of Se(IV)-enriched lettuce (Figure 4). The inorganic species (Se(IV) and Se(VI)) are a very
256
minor fraction of the total chromatographed selenium and they always account for ≤7% of the sum
257
of the eluting species (Table 2). More than 90% of the selenium eluted from the column is thus
258
represented by organic compounds, with two of them featuring as major species and constituting
259
~60% of the sum of the species. One of these two species (retention time 6.9 min) was identified as
260
SeMet. Apart from SeMet, none of the other organic compounds in Figure 2 matched any of the
261
unknown peaks in Figure 4. It has to be noticed that nearly 40% of the selenium solubilized by in
262
vitro gastrointestinal digestion does not elute from the column, which highlights the presence of
263
strongly retained compounds most likely of organic nature.
264
In order to characterize more closely the different organoselenium species present, cation
265
exchange HPLC-ICP-MS was used as an additional, complementary analytical approach (Figure 5).
266
An excellent agreement was found for SeMet, which again was found to account for one third of the
267
selenium species eluted (Table 3). Spiking experiments with SeCys2 showed coelution with the
268
peak at 10.5 min, thus providing evidence of the presence of this species in sample extracts.
269
A specific attention was paid to the possible presence of MeSeCys, which was reported as the
270
major organic species in lettuce in a previous study.30 However, in spiking experiments, none of the
271
several organic compounds present coeluted with the MeSeCys standard, thus demonstrating that
272
this species was absent. The occurrence of SeHLan, a non-protein selenoaminoacid produced by
273
plants via the sulfur assimilation pathway and identified for the first time in selenium-enriched
274
Japanese pungent radish,34 was also excluded based on spiking experiments. Co-chromatography of
275
the γ-Glu-MeSeCys standard spiked in the sample extracts showed that this species was absent as
276
well. 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 31
Page 13 of 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
277
An attempt was then made to identify the organoselenium compounds present in the anion
278
exchange fraction eluting between 1.5-4.5 min, which was collected and injected in cation exchange
279
HPLC-ICP-MS. The fraction contained a species eluting in the void and one at ~8 min, which
280
however did not coelute with any of the available standards and, in particular, SeOMet. This species
281
was a potential candidate for the identity of the anion exchange peak at 2.7 min as it is easily
282
formed by SeMet oxidation and thus it has been widely found in enzymatic extracts of plant
283
materials and selenized yeast.35-38
284
Unfortunately, post-column recovery did not improve with cation exchange chromatography,
285
confirming that reactive compounds that are retained by the column are largely present in the
286
gastrointestinal hydrolysate of Se(IV)-enriched lettuce. In summary, SeMet was confirmed to
287
account for about one third of the sum of the species; taking into account post-column recovery, this
288
translates in not less than 20% of the bioaccessible selenium after gastrointestinal digestion.
289
In gastrointestinal extracts of Se(VI)-enriched lettuce, Se(VI) was found to be the
290
predominant species (Figure 6), accounting for 64-80% of the eluting selenium in anion exchange
291
chromatography (Table 2). Cation exchange chromatography, where Se(VI) elutes in the void
292
(along with some of the early-eluting species in anion exchange chromatography), showed good
293
quantitative agreement (Table 3). Both chromatographic approaches gave consistent results for
294
SeMet, which account for 11-12% of the sum of the species in lettuce grown at the lowest applied
295
dose of Se(VI) and decreases to 4-5% at the highest dose. No MeSeCys was found to be present in
296
extracts of Se(VI)-enriched lettuce, and the same hold true for the other organic species in Fig. 3.
297
Taken together, these results confirms that lettuce plants are able to metabolize the supplied
298
Se(IV) to SeMet and other organic compounds. Upon Se(VI) amendment, the compound is
299
efficiently translocated to the aerial part of the plant mostly unchanged. The more extensive
300
biotransformation to organic forms of Se(IV) compared to Se(VI) is in line with the available
301
evidence.13,15-18 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
302
From the standpoint of both nutritional quality and safety, the Se(IV)-enriched lettuce
303
produced at the lowest fortification levels investigated in this study appears more favourable as
304
potential selenium source for human consumption. Taking the 25 µM sample as an example, it
305
provides 1.6 µg g-1 fresh weight of bioaccessible selenium (dry to fresh weight conversion factor is
306
19.8), equivalent to 135 µg for a 100 g portion of lettuce, consisting of