Subscriber access provided by University of Pennsylvania Libraries
Biotechnology and Biological Transformations
SmMYB111 is a key factor to phenolic acid biosynthesis and interacts with both SmTTG1 and SmbHLH51 in Salvia miltiorrhiza Shasha Li, Yucui Wu, Jing Kuang, Huaiqin Wang, Tangzhi Du, Yaya Huang, Yuan Zhang, Xiaoyan Cao, and Zhezhi Wang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02548 • Publication Date (Web): 12 Jul 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 16, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 38
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
SmMYB111 is a key factor to phenolic acid biosynthesis and interacts
2
with both SmTTG1 and SmbHLH51 in Salvia miltiorrhiza
3
Shasha Li1#, Yucui Wu2#, Jing Kuang3, Huaiqin Wang1, Tangzhi Du1, Yaya Huang1, Yuan
4
Zhang1, Xiaoyan Cao1*, Zhezhi Wang1*
5
1
6
in Northwest of China, Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Medicinal
7
Resources and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an
8
710062, China;
9
2
National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Development of Endangered Crude Drugs
School of Landscape and Ecological Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering,
10
Handan 056038, China;
11
3
12
# These authors contributed equally to this work.
13
*Authors for correspondence:
14
Xiaoyan Cao (Tel: 86-29-85310266 Email:
[email protected] ORCID ID:
15
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3188-6663)
16
Zhezhi Wang (Tel: 86-29-85310260 Email:
[email protected] 17
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6111-1551)
Ningxia Polytechnic, Yinchuan 750001, China;
18
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ORCID ID:
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 2 of 38
19
Abstract
20
Transcription factors that include myeloblastosis (MYB), basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH),
21
and
22
the phenylpropanoid pathway. However only a few MYB and bHLH members involved in
23
the biosynthesis of salvianolic acid B (Sal B) have been reported, and little is known about
24
Sal B pathway regulation by the WD40 protein transparent testa glabra1 (TTG1)-dependent
25
transcriptional complexes in Salvia miltiorrhiza. We isolated SmTTG1 from that species for
26
detailed functional characterization. Enhanced or reduced expression of SmTTG1 was
27
achieved by gain- or loss-of-function assays, respectively, revealing that SmTTG1 is
28
necessary for Sal B biosynthesis. Interaction partners of SmTTG1 protein were screened by
29
yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assays with the cDNA library of S. miltiorrhiza. A new
30
R2R3-MYB transcription factor, SmMYB111, was found through this screening.
31
Transgenic plants over-expressing or showing reduced expression of SmMYB111
32
up-regulated or deregulated, respectively, the yields of Sal B. Both Y2H and Bimolecular
33
Fluorescent Complementation experiments demonstrated that SmMYB111 interacts with
34
SmTTG1 and SmbHLH51, a positive regulator of the phenolic acid pathway. Our data
35
verified the function of SmTTG1 and SmMYB111 in regulating phenolic acid biosynthesis
36
in S. miltiorrhiza. Furthermore, ours is the first report of the potential ternary transcription
37
complex SmTTG1–SmMYB111–SmbHLH51, which is involved in the production of Sal B
38
in that species.
39
Keywords: Salvia miltiorrhiza; salvianolic acid B; SmTTG1; SmMYB111; transcription
40
complex.
WD-repeat
protein,
which
often
forms
a
41 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ternary
complex
to
regulate
Page 3 of 38
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
42
Introduction
43
Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge is a perennial medicinal plant with great medicinal and
44
economic value.1 Its dry roots have been used for more than two thousand years in
45
traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to treat various diseases, such as cardiovascular
46
diseases, coronary heart diseases, dysmenorrhea, and amenorrhoea.2, 3 It presents a model
47
plant system for TCM research because of its high transformation efficiency, short life
48
cycle, published whole genome data, and reliable therapeutic actions.4 The active
49
pharmaceutical ingredients of danshen include two major groups: lipophilic tanshinones5
50
and hydrophilic salvianolic acids.6 Among the phenolic acids, salvianolic acid B (Sal B)
51
is predominant and is regarded as a powerful natural product
52
properties and scavenging of free radicals.7 It offers protection against fibrosis, tumor
53
development, aging, and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases.7, 8
for its antioxidant
54
The biosynthetic pathway of Sal B is thought to include both phenylpropanoid and
55
tyrosine-derived pathways.9 The former is a general pathway for the synthesis of phenolic
56
acids, flavonoids (e.g., anthocyanins and flavones), and lignins.9, 10 Although Sal B is an
57
important medicinal component, only relatively low levels are produced by S. miltiorrhiza
58
plants. Therefore, biological approaches have been taken to augment its synthesis,
59
including the engineering of genes in the biosynthetic pathway and ectopic expression of
60
transcription factors (TFs).11-15 For example, ectopic overexpression of AtPAP1, a MYB
61
TF gene from Arabidopsis thaliana, can strongly enrich Sal B in S. miltiorrhiza.11
62
Myeloblastosis (MYB) TF plays a key role in regulating plant flavonoid biosynthesis
63
that interact with basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) and transparent testa glabra1 (TTG1), a 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
64
WD40 repeat protein, to form MBW complexes and control the phenylpropanoid
65
pathway.16-21 Arabidopsis bHLHs from subgroup IIIf (including GL3, EGL3, MYC1, and
66
TT8) and MYBs (e.g., PAP1/2/3/4, TT2, AtMYB5, and AtMYB4) directly interact with
67
TTG1 to form MBW complexes and play a transcriptional role in the biosynthesis of
68
flavonoids.17, 22, 23 Wan et al.24 have shown that PtrMYB57–bHLH131–PtrTTG1 negatively
69
regulates the biosynthesis of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins in Populus trichocarpa.
70
Although a few endogenous MYBs and bHLHs are reported to be involved in modulating
71
Sal B biosynthesis,25-30 little is known about this regulatory role by TTG1 and
72
TTG1-dependent transcriptional complexes in S. miltiorrhiza.
73
The WD40 repeat protein TTG1 is encoded by single-copy genes, which is the common
74
denominator of overlapping regulatory complexes.31,
32
75
controlling development and secondary metabolism, such as the formation of trichomes,
76
synthesis of flavonoids, seed coat mucilage, and root hair development.32 This TTG1
77
commonly acts as a scaffold for the combinational interactions between the MYB and
78
bHLH, which are indispensable for regulating the transcriptional activity of the MBW
79
complex.33, 34
It only exists in higher plants,
80
Here, we explored the function of SmTTG1 in S. miltiorrhiza through experiments with
81
overexpression and RNAi-mediated silencing. Our results indicated that SmTTG1 is
82
necessary for Sal B biosynthesis. Using SmTTG1 as bait, we then screened a new MYB TF
83
from the S. miltiorrhiza cDNA library by yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assays and named it
84
SmMYB111. Transgenic plants over-expressing or silencing SmMYB111 significantly
85
induced or reduced, respectively, the accumulation of Sal B. Both Y2H and Bimolecular 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 38
Page 5 of 38
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
86
Fluorescent Complementation (BiFC) experiments demonstrated that SmMYB111 interacts
87
not only with SmTTG1 but also with SmbHLH51, a positive regulator of this phenolic acid
88
pathway. We speculated that SmMYB111 positively regulates the synthesis of phenolic
89
acids -- Sal B and rosmarinic acid (RA) -- in S. miltiorrhiza by forming SmTTG1–
90
SmMYB111–SmbHLH51 ternary transcription complex.
91
Materials and Methods
92
Culture and Treatment of S. miltiorrhiza
93
Seeds of S. miltiorrhiza were collected from the experimental fields of Shaanxi Normal
94
University. Sterile plantlets were produced as previously described35. Roots, stems, leaves,
95
and flowers from two-year-old greenhouse-grown plants were collected in July for RNA
96
extraction. Standards of RA and Sal B were prepared as we described previously.11 All the
97
primers used in the study are listed in Table S1.
98
Two-month-old S. miltiorrhiza seedlings were sprayed with 500 µM methyl jasmonate
99
(MeJA), 500 µM salicylic acid (SA), or 50 µM gibberellin (GA) (100 mL per plantlet).
100
Roots were sampled after 0, 2, 6, 8, 12, 48, and 72 h of treatment and each sample included
101
six plantlets. Plantlets receiving only sterile water were used as controls.
102
Isolation and Sequence Analysis of SmTTG1 and SmMYB111
103
Genomic DNA and transcriptome cDNA was obtained as we described previously.36
104
SmTTG1 (GenBank Accession Number JX416285) and SmMYB111 (GenBank Accession
105
Number ASV64719.1) were cloned from the S. miltiorrhiza genomic DNA and
106
transcriptome cDNA with primers SmTTG1-F/R and SmMYB111-F/R, respectively. The
107
amplified products were inserted into the pMD19-T simple vector (TaKaRa) and 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
108
followed by sequencing.
109
Homologous protein sequences of SmMYB111 were aligned by CLUSTAL W (version
110
1.83). We constructed the phylogenetic tree by Molecular Evolutionary Genetics
111
Analysis software (MEGA 5.2) using the Neighbor-Joining method. The GenBank
112
accession numbers for all genes are listed in Table S2.
113
Yeast Two-hybrid Screening
114
The open reading frame (ORF) of SmTTG1 was amplified with primers 207‒
115
SmTTG1-F/R and cloned into donor vector pDONR207 to construct entry vector
116
pENTR207‒SmTTG1, and then transferred into pGBKT7 (BD) to construct pGBKT7‒
117
SmTTG1 according to the Gateway manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen, USA).
118
The autoactivation and toxicity test of bait protein SmTTG1 in yeast was performed as
119
described by Pan et al.37 Briefly, we transformed bait plasmid pGBKT7‒SmTTG1 into
120
AH109 yeast cells according to the instructions in the HighTM AH109 Competent Cell
121
Manual (Clontech, USA). Transformants were then put on agar plates containing
122
appropriate selection media, i.e., SD/-Trp/X-α-gal or SD/-Trp/-His/-Ade/X-α-gal, then
123
incubated at 29°C for 3 d before recording the growth. The pGBKT7 was used as a control.
124
To screen the host proteins that interact with SmTTG1, we used Y187 yeast cells
125
expressing the S. miltiorrhiza cDNA library to mate with AH109 cells expressing SmTTG1,
126
following the protocols described previously.37
127
Yeast Two-hybrid Assays
128
The ORFs of SmTTG1, SmMYB111, and SmbHLH51 (GenBank Accession Number
129
KT215166) were cloned into the donor vector pDONR207 to generate entry vector 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 38
Page 7 of 38
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
130
pENTR207‒SmTTG1, pENTR207‒SmMYB111, and pENTR207‒SmbHLH51, respectively.
131
They were then transferred into destination vector pGADT7 or pGBKT7 to construct
132
pGADT7‒SmTTG1/SmMYB111 or pGBKT7‒SmTTG1/SmbHLH51/SmMYB111 according
133
to the Gateway protocol. The resulting pGADT7 and pGBKT7 fusion constructs were
134
co-transformed into yeast strain AH109 as described by Gietz and Schiestl.38 The
135
interaction assays were performed based on the manufacturer’s protocol of Matchmaker
136
Gold Yeast Two-Hybrid System (Clontech), and Y2H images were taken on Day 5 of
137
incubation.
138
Bimolecular Fluorescent Complementation and Subcellular Localization
139
Primers 207‒SmTTG1-F/Rʹ, 207‒SmMYB111-F/Rʹ, and 207‒SmbHLH51-F/Rʹ were
140
designed (stop codons removed) to clone SmTTG1, SmMYB111, and SmbHLH51 into the
141
donor
142
pENTR207‒SmMYB111ʹ, and pENTR207‒SmbHLH51ʹ, respectively.
vector
pDONR207
and
construct entry
vectors
pENTR207‒SmTTG1ʹ,
143
For BiFC assays, pENTR207‒SmTTG1ʹ, pENTR207‒SmMYB111ʹ, and pENTR207‒
144
SmbHLH51ʹ were recombined into pEarleyGate202-YC (YC) or pEarleyGate201-YN (YN)
145
to construct BIFC expression vectors YC‒SmTTG1, YN‒SmMYB111, YN‒SmbHLH51 and
146
YC‒SmbHLH51. The YC and YN recombinant plasmids were mixed at equal density
147
before co-transformation. Co-transformation of YC‒SmTTG1+YN, YN‒SmMYB111+YC,
148
and YC‒SmbHLH51+ YN served as negative controls.
149
For subcellular localizations, pENTR207‒SmTTG1ʹ and pENTR207‒SmMYB111ʹ
150
were recombined into destination vector pEarleyGate10339 to construct subcellular
151
localization
expression
vectors
pSmTTG1‒GFP
and
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
pSmMYB111‒GFP.
The
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
152
pEarleyGate103 was used as a positive control.
153
Vectors were bombarded into onion epidermal cells using Gene Gun PDS-1000
154
(Bio-Rad, USA) at a helium pressure of 1100 psi. After 16 to 24 h of incubation
155
at 28°C in a dark chamber, the GFP fluorescence images from living cells were observed
156
using a Leica DM6000B microscope (Leica, Germany) with an excitation wavelength
157
of 475 nm.
158
Construction of Plant Expression Vectors and Plant Transformation
159
To obtain SmTTG1 and SmMYB111 overexpression vectors pEarleyGate 202‒SmTTG1 and
160
pEarleyGate 202‒SmMYB111, we used pENTR207‒SmTTG1 and pENTR207‒SmMYB111
161
to recombine SmTTG1 and SmMYB111 into the destination vector pEarleyGate 202. 39
162
SmTTG1-RNAi plasmid was constructed according to the methods we established
163
previously.36, Briefly,the 279-bp fragment of SmTTG1 cDNA (coding sequence positions
164
44-323 bp) were digested with BamHI/XbaI and KpnI/XhoI (TaKaRa) and inserted into
165
vector pKannibal40 to generate pK‒SmTTG1. An interfering box was inserted into pART27
166
to generate RNAi vector pSmTTG1–RNAi.
167
To construct the amiRNA-mediated SmMYB111-silenced recombinant expression
168
vector, we designed a pair of amiRNA oligonucleotide primers, amiR–SmMYB111-F/R,
169
using P‒SAMS software (http://p-sams.carringtonlab.org/). This synthesized amiRNA
170
cassette was then inserted into the pMDC123SB-AtMIR390a-B/c vector by BsaI
171
digestion. 41
172 173
S. miltiorrhiza transformation was performed based on protocols established in our laboratory. 42 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 38
Page 9 of 38
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
174
Molecular Detection of Transgenic Plantlets
175
The CaMV35S promoter was amplified from genomic DNA to check whether the gene had
176
been integrated into the transgenic plant genome, using previously published protocols.36
177
Total RNA from the roots of S. miltiorrhiza transgenic and wild-type (WT) plants was
178
extracted and converted into cDNA. Gene expression was monitored via qRT-PCR on a
179
LightCycler® 96 real-time PCR detection system (Roche, Switzerland), with housekeeping
180
gene SmUbiquitin serving as an internal reference. Relative expression level of each gene,
181
expressed as fold change relative to controls, was calculated by the comparative CT
182
method.43
183
Based on the transcriptional levels of SmMYB111, we conducted qRT-PCR to determine
184
the expression levels of key enzyme genes for the biosynthetic pathway of salvianolic
185
acids.
186
Determination of Phenolics Concentrations by LC/MS Analysis
187
Roots from two-month-old transgenic plants of S. miltiorrhiza were collected and dried at
188
20±2°C. The phenolic compounds were extracted as described previously.11
189
We determined the content of RA and Sal B on an Agilent 1260 HPLC system coupled
190
to an Agilent 6460 QQQ LC-MS system. The extracts were diluted 1000 times and
191
separated on a Welch Ultimate XB-C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm, 3 µm). Chromatographic
192
separations were performed over a 10-min time span, using organic mobile phase
193
acetonitrile as solvent A and aqueous mobile phase with 0.1% formic acid (v/v, in
194
deionized water) as solvent B. The linear gradient comprised 20% to 60% A (0–6 min),
195
60% to 20% A (6–7 min), and 20% to 20% A (7–10 min). The flow rate was set at 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 38
196
0.4 mL/min. Conditions for mass spectrometry were as follows: negative mode; drying
197
gas flow rate was set at, 10 L/min and temperature 300°C; nebulizer pressure, 45 psi; ion
198
spray voltage, 3500 V; and sheath gas of 11 L/min, at a temperature of 350°C. Retention
199
times were 3.8 min for RA and 4.1 min for Sal B. The precursor/product ion of RA is
200
359.1>161; Sal B is 717.2>519.2. We established standard curves of authentic reference
201
standards to quantify these phenolics concentrations.
202
Determination of Anthocyanin Concentrations
203
Anthocyanin concentrations were determined from the roots of two-month-old transgenic
204
and WT S. miltiorrhiza, following quantification protocols that we have described
205
previously.11
206
Results
207
Generation
208
miltiorrhiza Plants
209
Transgenic plants of S. miltiorrhiza that either over-expressed or suppressed SmTTG1
210
were confirmed by PCR, which contain an expected 901-bp fragment of the CaMV35S
211
promoter (Figure S1). The expression level of SmTTG1 in the transgenics was examined
212
by qRT-PCR (Figure 1). Two independent SmTTG1-overexpressing lines (OT-10 and
213
OT-14) with significantly elevated SmTTG1 expression and two SmTTG1-RNAi lines
214
(iT-2 and iT-3) with significantly reduced expression were selected for further analysis.
215
The controls for this analysis were untransformed WT plants (CK).
of
SmTTG1-overexpressing
and
SmTTG1-RNAi
Transgenic
S.
216
Compared with the CK, the transgenic plantlets showed obvious phenotypic changes.
217
Whereas stems from CK and OT samples were partially red, those from iTs were 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 38
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
218
completely green. Anthocyanin concentrations were significantly lower in the roots from
219
iT plants than from the CK, which indicated that SmTTGl is involved in the regulation of
220
anthocyanin biosynthesis in S. miltiorrhiza. Furthermore, the stems from OT plants had
221
significantly more trichomes when compared with the CK, while the iT plants had very
222
few trichomes (Figure 1), indicating that SmTTG1 favors trichome formation.
223
SmTTG1 Regulates the Production of Sal B and RA in S. miltiorrhiza
224
Results from LC/MS showed that the concentrations of RA and its dimer Sal B in the
225
roots of two-month-old S. miltiorrhiza plantlets did not differ significantly between CK
226
samples and overexpressing lines OT-10 and OT-14 (Figure 2). However, when
227
compared with CK, the levels of both components were significantly lower (P