Synergistic inhibitory effects of acacetin and eleven other flavonoids

DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04683. Publication Date (Web): November 1, 2018. Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. Cite this:J. Agric. Food Chem. X...
0 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF LOUISIANA

Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions

Synergistic inhibitory effects of acacetin and eleven other flavonoids isolated from Artemisia sacrorum on lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells Qianqian Ma, Yunlong Cui, Siyuan Xu, Yiyao Zhao, Haidan Yuan, and Guangchun Piao J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04683 • Publication Date (Web): 01 Nov 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 2, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 38

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Synergistic inhibitory effects of acacetin and eleven other flavonoids isolated from Artemisia sacrorum on lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells Qianqian Ma,1 Yunlong Cui,1 Siyuan Xu,1Yiyao, Zhao,1 Haidan Yuan,1,2,* and Guangchun Piao 1, 2,*

College of Pharmacy, Yanbian University; Yanji, Jilin,133002, China.

1

Key Laboratory of Natural Resources of Changbai Mountain & Functional

2

Molecules (Yanbian University), Ministry of Education, China. *Corresponding

authors:

Guangchun

Piao,

Tel:

86-433-2436008;

Fax:

86-433-2435026; E-mail: [email protected]; Haidan Yuan, Tel: 86-433-2435062; Fax: 86-433-2435026; E-mail: [email protected]

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1 2

ABSTRACT: Artemisia sacrorum Ledeb., a Compositae forage plant in China, has

3

been found to have an inhibitory effect on lipid accumulation. We selected twelve

4

flavonoids, which we had isolated from Artemisia sacrorum and had the potential to

5

inhibit lipid accumulation in the literature or in our preliminary experiments, and

6

grouped them into eleven compound combinations; we investigated their synergistic

7

inhibitory effects on lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells. In screening experiments,

8

Oil-Red O staining, triglyceride levels, and lipid accumulation levels all indicated that

9

combined acacetin and apigenin displayed a significant synergistic inhibitory effect

10

and the best repeatability. Subsequent research showed that this combination could

11

synergistically promote the phosphorylations of AMPK and ACC. Furthermore, to a

12

different extent, that combination had significant synergistic inhibitory effects on

13

various genes or proteins related to adipogenesis and lipogenesis. Thus, that

14

combination could significantly reduce triglyceride levels and lipid accumulation

15

compared with acacetin or apigenin acting alone.

16 17

KEY WORDS: Artemisia sacrorum Ledeb., AMP-activated protein kinase, lipid

18

accumulation, acacetin, apigenin, synergistic effect

19 20 21 22

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 38

Page 3 of 38

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

23

INTRODUCTION

24

Artemisia sacrorum Ledeb. is a semi-shrub herbaceous plant that grows on hillsides

25

and in thickets, forests, and grasslands at middle and low elevations. In plant

26

communities in local areas on sunny mountain slopes, it is often the dominant species

27

or main companion species.1 In the Yili area (Xinjiang, China), the protein and crude

28

fat contents in Compositae forage plants, such as Artemisia sacrorum, are higher than

29

in Gramineae. Use of Compositae forage plants is seasonal, and they are mainly eaten

30

by young animals; the plants are most commonly consumed in early spring, autumn,

31

and winter.2 Furthermore, in the Yanbian area (Jilin, China) and in Korea, Artemisia

32

sacrorum has a long history of folk application for the prevention and treatment of

33

various liver diseases. In recent years, we have demonstrated experimentally that

34

Artemisia sacrorum can inhibit lipid accumulation and adipocyte differentiation by

35

activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in 3T3-L1 cells and HepG2 cells.3-5

36

We are also conducting research into the use of Artemisia sacrorum in treating

37

alcoholic fatty liver (Figure 1).

38

Excessive lipid accumulation is associated with many health problems, such as

39

obesity, fatty liver diseases, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.6-8

40

Lipid accumulation, such as obesity, is closely related to lipid metabolism, such as

41

adipogenesis and lipogenesis. AMPK adjusts the metabolism of fats and

42

carbohydrates to regulate cellular energy homeostasis.9 Upon activation, AMPK

43

inhibits the expressions of Sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP1c),

44

CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein

(C/EBPα),

peroxisome proliferator-activated

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

45

receptor γ (PPARγ), and their downstream genes, and it thereby suppresses

46

adipogenesis.10 SREBP1c is one of the transcription factors involved in adipogenesis

47

and lipogenesis; it activates genes and enzymes, such as fatty acid synthase (FAS),

48

stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD1), which are related to adipocyte maturation and

49

biosynthesis of triglycerides and fatty acids; they thus regulate lipogenesis

50

preferentially.9 At the same time, it is important to note that mechanisms of adipocyte

51

differentiation have been extensively studied using in vitro systems in which 3T3-L1

52

is one of the most frequently employed cell lines. 3T3-L1 cells were clonally isolated

53

from Swiss 3T3 cells derived from disaggregated mouse embryos for the past 40

54

years.11

55

In our previous experiment, by using different chromatographic methods (such as a

56

silica gel column, macroporous adsorbent resin, ODS, Sephadex, and Prep-HPLC),

57

we isolated over fifty compounds from Artemisia sacrorum and elucidated their

58

structures by their physical and chemical properties and nuclear magnetic resonance

59

(NMR) techniques. Among them, more than twenty were flavonoids some of which

60

had inhibitory effects on lipid accumulation as reported in the literature.12-15 For

61

example, luteolin treatment was found to inhibit adipogenic, lipogenic, and GLUT4

62

genes and thereby reduced the levels of triglyceride in 3T3-L1 cells during

63

adipogenesis.12 In another study, quercetin was observed to suppress lipid

64

accumulation in 3T3-L1 cell, zebrafish, and mouse models by inhibiting the

65

expressions of lipogenic and adipogenic cytokines.13 At the same time, some of these

66

flavonoids had inhibitory effects on lipid accumulation in our preliminary

4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 38

Page 5 of 38

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

67

experiments. So there were twelve compounds that had the potential to inhibit lipid

68

accumulation in the literature or in our previous experiments. Especially, acacetin had

69

strong activity and good reproducibility. Many monomer compounds exist in

70

traditional medicinal plants or prescriptions, and they form the material basis for drug

71

effectiveness. In many cases, there may be synergy between two or more monomers

72

in effecting a cure or reducing toxicity.16 For example, both in vivo and in vitro,

73

co-treatment of the monomer compound choline and ferulic acid from the traditional

74

herb Rhizoma coptidis demonstrated less toxicity and stronger anti-hyperglycemic

75

effects synergistically than the original herbal extract.17 Furthermore, in the treatment

76

of acute promyelocytic leukemia, indirubin, tetraarsenic tetrasulfide and tanshinone

77

IIA from the Realgar-Indigo naturalis formula demonstrated a synergistic effect in

78

vitro and in vivo models.18 Various constituents in a herb or formula may improve the

79

bioavailability, or they may act differently on target genes, proteins and channels to

80

effect a cure or reduce toxicity so as to produce synergistic effects.16

81

So we wonder if acacetin and eleven other flavonoids have synergistic inhibitory

82

effects on lipid accumulation. If so, how does it relate to the protein and gene

83

expressions mentioned above? In the present study, we aimed to identify if there are

84

any synergistic effects in inhibiting lipid accumulation between acacetin and each of

85

eleven other flavonoids isolated from Artemisia sacrorum.

86

MATERIALS AND METHODS

87

Chemicals and Reagents. Twelve compounds: jaceosidin (compound 1),

88

kaempferol (compound 2), chrysoeriol (compound 3), quercetin (compound 4),

5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 6 of 38

89

apigenin (compound 5), hispidulin (compound 6), luteolin (compound 7), quercitrin

90

(compound 8), rutin (compound 9), isorhamnetin (compound 10), genkwanin

91

(compound 11), acacetin (compound 12), were all isolated from Artemisia sacrorum

92

in our previous study (Figure 1). The quantities of these compounds ranged from

93

several milligrams to dozens of milligrams. After multiple purification, the purity of

94

each of these compounds was more than 98% respectively. 3T3-L1 cells were

95

purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium

96

(DMEM),

97

penicillin-streptomycin were purchased from Gibco by Life Technologies (Grand

98

Island, NY). TG assay Kit was purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering

99

Institute, China. Protein extraction, EASY BLUE total RNA extraction, and

100

ECL-reagent kits were from Intron Biotechnology Inc (Beverly, MA, USA). Bio-Rad

101

protein assay kit was from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA, USA). Acetyl-CoA

102

carboxylase (ACC), phospho-ACC (pACC), AMPK, and phospho-AMPK (pAMPK)

103

antibodies were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Anti-actin was

104

from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

Bovine

Serum

(FCS),

Fetal

Bovine

Serum

(FBS)

and

105

Cell culture and cytotoxicity assay. 3T3-L1 cells were cultured in DMEM

106

containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 unit/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL

107

streptomycin at 37 ℃ in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. For cytotoxicity assay, 3×104

108

3T3-L1 cells per well were cultured in 96-well plates and treated with twelve

109

compounds at the concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 40 or 80 µM for 96 h, respectively. The

110

cytotoxicities of these compounds were determined by the MTT assay.19

6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 38

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

111

Adipocyte differentiation and treatments. 3T3-L1 cells were divided into normal

112

control (CON) group, differentiated control treated with differentiation medium (DM)

113

group, differentiated positive control treated with differentiation medium plus

114

pioglitazone (PIO) group, and twelve individual treatment groups treated with twelve

115

compounds alone respectively, and eleven combined treatment groups treated with

116

combinations of compound 12 plus compound X (X=1-11) respectively. Individual

117

treatment groups were treated with 20 µM of compounds 2, 3, 5-12, respectively; 10

118

µM of compounds 1, 4, respectively. Combined treatment groups were treated with

119

combinations of compound 12 (10 µM) plus compounds 2, 3, 5-11 (10 µM)

120

respectively, and combinations of compound 12 (10 µM) plus compounds 1, 4 (5 µM)

121

respectively.

122

5×105 3T3-L1 cells per well were cultured in 6-well culture plates. When the cells

123

were incubated until confluence (day 0), they were exposed to differentiation medium

124

I (DM)(DMEM, 5% FBS, 10 µg/mL insulin, 1 mM dexamethasone and 0.5 mM

125

3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine) for 4 days (day 4); and then, except CON group, the

126

cells were exposed to differentiation medium II (DMEM containing 5% FBS and 10

127

µg/mL insulin) for 2 more days (day 6); and then, except CON group, the cells were

128

exposed to differentiation medium III (DMEM containing 5% FBS) for 2 more days

129

(day 8). During adipocyte differentiation, the cells were treated with corresponding

130

compounds for corresponding concentrations from day 0 to day 4.

131

Oil-Red O staining. The differentiated cells were mildly washed twice with

132

phophate-buffered saline (PBS), and fixed with 10% formalin for 1 h. Then the cells

7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

133

were stained with Oil-Red O Solution for 2 h, after that the solution was removed.

134

Next the plates were washed with water three times. The pictures were taken by an

135

Olympus microscope. Then 6-well plates were treated with isopropanol and lipid

136

accumulation was determined using the absorbance at 540 nm.

137

Measurement of triglyceride level. To measure triglyceride (TG) content, the

138

3T3-L1 cells were lysed in lysis buffer (25 mM sucrose, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM

139

EDTA and 1 mM EGTA) and the lysis buffer were collected and centrifugated at

140

13,000 rpm for 15 min. And the levels of TG were measured by using TG assay Kit in

141

accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer. The concentration of protein

142

was determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories,

143

Hercules, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

144

To prove the synergy in our experiments, here we designed another validation

145

experiment of TG determination in which two doses (20 μM and 40 μM) were set for

146

compounds 12 and 5, respectively; in addition, when the total dose was 20 μM or 40

147

μM, three combinations were set according to the dose-ratio of the two

148

drugs(compound 12: compound 5=3:1, 1:1, and 1:3). Then combination index (CI)

149

and drug reduction index (DRI) were calculated using CompuSyn software

150

(ComboSyn Inc, Paramus, NJ, USA).

151

Western blot analysis.

152

The 3T3-L1 cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and a protein extraction

153

kit(Intron biotechnology, USA) was used to extract total protein which was

154

centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 20 min to remove insoluble protein.

8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 38

Page 9 of 38

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

155

The supernatant was collected from the lysates and protein concentrations were

156

determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay reagent following the manufacturer's

157

instructions. A Bio-Rad protein assay kit was used to measure protein concentrations

158

in cell lysates. After separation with 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

159

(SDS-PAGE), equal amounts of proteins (40 μg) proteins were transferred to

160

polyvinylidene difluoride membranes(Millipore, Bedford, MA).

161

The membranes were further incubated for 1 h with blocking solution

162

(Tris-buffered saline/Tween 20 [TBST] containing 5% skin milk (wt/vol)) at room

163

temperature, and then incubated with primary antibodies over night at 4°C. Then the

164

membranes were washed 4 times with 0.1% TBST and incubated with secondary

165

antibody for 1 h at room temperature. An enhanced chemiluminescence Western

166

blotting detection kit was used to detect the protein bands which were then exposed to

167

X-ray film.

168

RNA isolation and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

169

An EASY-BLUE total RNA extraction kit was used to isolate the total RNA in

170

accordance with the manufacturer`s instructions. 5 μg of RNA, oligo (15) dT primers,

171

and reverse transcriptase in total volume of 50 μL were used to achieve the

172

First-strand cDNA synthesis. PCR reactions were done in a total volume of 20 μL

173

consisted of 2 μL of cDNA product, 0.8 unit of Taq polymerase, 20 pmol of each

174

primer, and 0.2 mM of each dNTP. In order to amplify the cDNA fragments, PCR was

175

performed at 95 ℃ for 30 sec, followed by 50 ℃ (FAS, ACC, C/EBPα), 56 ℃

176

(SCD1), 58 ℃ (SREBP1c, Actin, glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT)),

9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

177

55 ℃ (PPARγ), respectively for 30 s, and 72 ℃ for 1 min. The RT-PCR products were

178

electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels under 100 V and were stained with 0.5 µg/mL

179

ethidium bromide. The primers were shown in Table 1.

180

Statistical analysis. All data were expressed as a mean±standard error and

181

differences between groups were analyzed by one- way ANOVA analysis followed by

182

Student Newman Keuls. Each value was the mean of at least three separate

183

experiments in each group and mean values were considered significantly different

184

when p