Pittsburgh Conference Atlantic City, N. J., March 8-12, 1982

May 29, 2012 - Pittsburgh Conference Atlantic City, N. J., March 8-12, 1982. Anal. Chem. , 1982, 54 (6), pp 682A–683A. DOI: 10.1021/ac00243a715...
1 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
Editors' Column

Pittsburgh Conference Atlantic City, N. J., March 8-12, 1982 Conference Attracts Nearly 20,000 In the midst of an acknowledged economic recession in the U.S., the Pittsburgh Conference and Exposition on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy again broke all its previous attendance records. There were 75 new exhibitors this year! (See Table I for data comparisons with previous years.) The Pittsburgh Conference and Exposition will meet again in Atlantic City next year, March 7-11. The site for the 1984 meeting is not final, but meetings will be held in New Orleans in 1985 and Atlanta in 1986. The cover design on the official program—a representation of a chemist and the word "chemistry" written in different languages—was used to call attention to increasing international participation in the conference. Centcom, Ltd., advertising management for American Chemical Society publications, held its fourth annual Pittsburgh Conference breakfast for industry executives March 9. James Byrne, advertising sales manager for ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, opened these proceedings by introducing the panel members and some of the ACS and Centcom representatives in the audience. The discussions, moderated by Mary L. Good, vice-president and director of research for Universal Oil Products, focused on opportunities and trends in the analytical instrument field. Top executives from Bausch & Lomb, Varian, and Zymark provided answers to provocative questions devised by Centcom to elicit information and an interesting discussion. James D. Edwards, vice-president of the Instrument Group at Bausch & Lomb, remarked on the rapid obsolescence of instrumentation resulting from the increasing pace of developments in this high-technology field. He stressed the importance of the service role by instrument companies as instruments move increasingly out of the laboratory and into factories.

Allen Lauer, president of the Varian Instrument Group, rejected the suggestion that the number of new applications for analytical instruments is decreasing and said that the geopolitical climate and the advent of microprocessor and other high-technology developments are fueling growth in the analytical instrument business. Special factors driving the growth in this business are new column technologies, new combinations of instruments, and the increasing importance of biotechnology. Lauer did acknowledge that there is a slowing down in hardware innovations. He also stressed that it is important for instrument companies to provide application support for their customers. Zymark Corporation's president, Francis H. Zenie, did not agree with the provocative suggestion that small companies may no longer have a role in this business. He called attention to

the large growth in the analytical instrument market: from about $400 million in 1970 to about $2.5 billion in 1982. A question directed to the panel from the floor dealt with the possibilities of less growth in the business due to political and economic changes. The questioner cited the problem of foreign exchange rates, the reduction of emphasis on regulations, and the lack of attention now given to energy. It was generally agreed by the panel that these factors would not adversely affect the business in the long run. Industry executives are certain that the public has not lost interest in maintaining environmental quality and that the energy problem, while not acute at this time, is still with us. National Science Foundation officials were present and were attempting to find out if recent tax changes are having the desired effect in financ-

Table 1. Pittsburgh Conference Statistics: 1980, '81, and '82 Year

1982

1981

1980

Total registration Conferees Exhibit only Press representatives Technical papers Exhibitors Booth spaces

19 884 14911 4 973 ~150 895 560 1 380

17 270 13 139 4 000 131 ~895 485 1 199

16 032 12 426 3 606 ~100 813 458 1 056

Table II. Educational Level of Job Candidates

% Changes, 1 9 8 0 - 8 2

+24 +20 +38 +50 + 10 +22 +31

Table III. Job Descriptions, 1982

Degree

1982

1980

PhD MS BS/BA No degree

315 147 246 14

217 104 155 8

+45 +41 +59 +75

Academic Government Employment agencies Industrial Sales

7 17 91 202 94

Totals

722

484

+49

Total

411

682 A · ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 54, NO. 6, MAY 1982

% Change

Editors' Column

Want to spot aqueous samples on your RPTLC plate?

800

700 Job openings

600 Job candidates

500

400

1 1980

1981

1

1982

Figure 1. Pittsburgh Conference employment data

ing increased R&D and in helping universities upgrade their instrumentation. Overall, the atmosphere was one of unbounded optimism with projections for a rosy economic future. The conference and exposition and especially the activities on the exhibit floor seemed to underscore and justify the optimism. But Is There a Shortage of Analytical Chemists?

The oft-expressed lament regarding the shortage of analytical chemists (Anal. Chem. 1981,53 (13), 147481A) has to be seriously questioned in light of the change in employment statistics shown at this year's Pittsburgh Conference. In fact, from Figure 1 it is evident that the situation has turned around so that there are more candidates than jobs. Table II shows comparative data on the educational level of job candidates this year vs. 1980, and Table III lists the sources of the 411 job descriptions registered at the conference this year. The data show that the number of job candidates has increased nearly 50% since 1980 and 27% since 1981, while the number of job openings has decreased by 5% from 1980 and 10% from 1981. These data seem especially significant in view of the fact that the conference was so well attended. Other data collected by the ACS Office of Manpower Studies and the Office of Employment Aids also suggest that the shortage of analytical chemists may be a myth. Josephine M. Petruzzi

Here you go. The surface of our reversed phase TLC plates is an octadecyl hydrocarbon and, therefore, hydrophobic. Good RPTLC plates are fully silanized. Aqueous samples therefore do not spot well or easily on them. None of this is headline news. Here's some that is: Whatman now — right now — offers RPTLC plates that take aqueous samples beautifully. Easily. Without special anything. We've invented the Linear-K RPTLC plate. It has an analytical layer identical to that of our KCie/KdeF plates: ODS groups bonded to a special silica gel, fully silanized. Performance that's made the KCi e/KCi sF the most widely used RPTLC plate. Now we've added a Linear-K (preadsorbent) strip, 3 cm wide along the spotting edge, and an "L" prefix: LKCie/LKCieF plates. Benefits: 1. no problem spotting aqueous samples; 2. better resolution of high organic solubilized samples; 3. reduced spotting time, better sensitivity, even higher sample loadings. And every package of LKCis/LKCisF plates carries the pioneering Whatman Certificate of Analysis*. RPTLC of aqueous samples? No problem. Use LKCie/LKCieF plates. Whatman plates. *For a full discussion of the C of A program — a revolution in TLC — please write or call. To order call Toll Free: 800-631-7290 (in N.J. call collect: 201773-5800) or write: Whatman Chemical Separation Inc. 9 Bridewell Place, Clifton, New Jersey 07014

Whatman

CIRCLE 237 ON READER SERVICE CARD